Grace Abuhamad: Welcome to the 3rd Webinar for the CWG-Stewardship. We will start at 16:00 UTC. Grace Abuhamad: Please note that questions/comments will be at the end of the presentation. The Adobe room is listen-only (and question/comments through chat). Please refer to call details received in your RSVP for audio. Grace Abuhamad: When submitting a question that you want me to read out loud, please start with a <QUESTION> and end with a ³</QUESTION>². Text outside these quotes will be considered as part of ³chat² and will not be read out loud Grace Abuhamad: Please note that chat sessions are being archived and follow the ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior: http://www.icann.org/en/news/in-focus/accountability/expected-standards Robert Guerra: hello all (again) Bernard Turcotte - staff support: ditto matthew shears: Hello all Pär Brumark Niue: Hi all! Bernard Turcotte - staff support: Chuck are you there? Taylor Bentley: Hi, was the Matrix of all the strawman proposals considered made public? Graeme Bunton: All of the work is public, as far as I know Taylor Taylor Bentley: Thanks Graeme, I guess its just a matter of finding it! Thanks Stephanie Duchesneau (RySG): all of the documents (including the strawmen and the strawman matrix) are archived here https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/Current+Drafts jaap akkerhuis SSAC: The working group site starts at https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/CWG+to+Develop+an+I ANA+Stewardship+Transition+Proposal+on+Naming+Related+Functions jaap akkerhuis SSAC: (Got beaten in chatting this) Grace Abuhamad: Thanks both! Taylor Bentley: Eureka! Thank you Grace Abuhamad: @stephanie and @jaap Grace Abuhamad: Please note that questions/comments will be at the end of the presentation. The Adobe room is listen-only (and question/comments through chat). Please refer to call details received in your RSVP for audio. Grace Abuhamad: When submitting a question that you want me to read out loud, please start with a <QUESTION> and end with a ³</QUESTION>². Text outside these quotes will be considered as part of ³chat² and will not be read out loud Jimmy Schulz: sorry for the delay... I was still in the car. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben: Question: Re the submission of the proposal: is coordimation with the ICG still needed in order to synchronize the timelines? Question Grace Abuhamad: Thanks @wolf Ulrich. Noted steve metalitz: QUESTION: Please explain further why it was thought necessary to create contract Co. solely to sign the contract? Couldn't this function be combined with MRT? QUESTION Alan Greenberg: Who determines "all" (in all of the relevant communities) Grace Abuhamad: Thank you @Steve. Noted Alan Greenberg: <QUESTION> Who determines "all" (in all of the relevant communities) <QUESTION> Grace Abuhamad: Thanks @Alan. Noted Lise Fuhr: @Wolf-Ulrich In order to answer your question could you elaborate about what you mean with synchronize the timeline? P. Vergote (DNS Belgium): <QUESTION> Would Contract.co, MRT, CST & IAP "operate" under US law? <QUESTION> Marika Konings: Thanks P. Vergote, your question has been noted. Stephen Deerhake: QUESTION: Is the Appeals Panel intended to be the vehicle for the never implemented ³Internet DNS Names Review Board (IDNB)² mentioned in RFC-1591 (3)(4)? Marika Konings: Thanks Stephen, noted. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben: @Lise: there seems to be a slight "overlap" of 2 weeks up to know. ICG is expecting the proposals by mid Jan 15 Wolf-Ulrich Knoben: Question: does the CWG intend to ask for external consultancy re the details of the Contract Co? Question Jimmy Schulz: thx Marika Konings: Thanks, Wolf-Ulrich. Noted. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben: sorry I have to leave for another appointment. Will read the recordined text. Thanks and bye Stephen Deerhake: QUESTION: How flushed out is the composition of Contract Co? Where do the Board members come from? How will ³capture² of Contract Co be prevented? Marika Konings: Thanks, Stephen, noted Alan Greenberg: With relation to MRT Marika Konings: Sorry, Steve, skipped over your question. It is next in line. steve metalitz: QUESTION: There has been much discussion of "stress test" scenarios for the transition arrangement. Has WG had the chance to subject its proposal to "stress testing,"and if not, at what point in the process would WG expect this to occur? QUESTION Marika Konings: @Steve, noted Robert Guerra: indeed. it is mentioned in RFP 4. Details here https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/CWG-RFP4++Transition+Implications Alan Greenberg: QUESTION If Contract Co violates its bylaws or articles on incorporation who has standing to take action and through what process? QUESTION Stephen Deerhake: QUESTION: My question regarding ³capture² was serious. I refer you to the 2000-2001 period if ICANN¹s existence when they were basically attempting to extort contracts from ccTLDs before IANA would make critical root zone name server changes. How do we prevent that sort of thing from happening in the future? Marika Konings: Thanks, Alan and Stephen, noted. Chuck Gomes (RySG): @ Stephen Deerhake: Please submit ways that caputure can be prevented in the public comment period. Chuck Gomes (RySG): thanks Lise, Greg and Marika. Nice job. Philip Sheppard BRG: well done everyone. Clarity from chaos. Stephen Deerhake: Thanks Lise, Greg and Marika.And a big thanks to the WG. steve metalitz: Thanks to Greg and all other CWG participants for lots of hard and thoughtful work on this. michael niebel: Thank you Lise, Greg, very informative Jimmy Schulz: thanks a lot! Graeme Bunton: Thanks all. Bernard Turcotte - staff support: bye P. Vergote (DNS Belgium): thank you! Gordon Chillcott: Thank you. jaap akkerhuis SSAC: bye Greg Shatan: Goodbye all and thank you for your participation and attention. Lise Fuhr: Goodbye and thank you for listening Robert Guerra: bye all