Instructional Alignment Chart (3-5)

advertisement
Instructional Alignment Chart (3-5)
Finding Coherence- Instructional Alignment Chart Directions
Coherence: think across grades, and link to major topics within grades
Purpose: The instructional Alignment Chart gives a structure for professional collaborative conversations
about the Common Core State Standards and how they progress through the grade bands.
Step 1: Clusters for Grade levels.
Purpose: To focus thinking around one big idea


Review the appropriate clusters for your grade band:
o 3-5, 3.NF.A, 4.NF.A,5.NF.A
Discuss the big idea that the cluster is asking the students to know and be able to do.
Step 2: Changes
Purpose: To collaboratively determine and discuss how the cluster from the adjacent grades differ from
the grade level within the grade band.

Use the following questions to guide your conversations: (record information in boxes D and E.
o How is the cluster different from the previous grade level?
o Are there new concepts introduced or added?
o Are any concepts dropped?
o How does the demand of the cluster change?
o Does an idea or skill get more complex, and if so, how? For example: if students are
expected to describe in one grade level and then are expected to analyze and compare
in the following grade band.
Step 3: Determining Levels of Instruction
Purpose: To reflect on the level of instruction or varying levels of instruction that need to be considered
when designing or planning instruction for this cluster.

Review Three Levels of Instruction with Supporting Activities created by Gagné and Briggs.
o Using the Three Levels of Instruction with Supporting Activities document, discuss the
differences in providing developmental activities, reinforcement activities and drill and
practice activities, how they are sequential, and when each activity is appropriate.
o Based on the discussion of the three levels of instruction and a review of the
information listed in Boxes D and E, discuss and come to consensus on the appropriate
level(s) of instruction for each content comparison for your grade level.
o Record all information in Box F.
Step 4: Implications for Instruction
Purpose: to generate instructional approaches aligned to the content and processes in the standards.
Adapted from A Study of the Common Core State Standards developed by the Charles A. Dana Center at the University of Texas
at Austin
Instructional Alignment Chart (3-5)


Discuss which activities form the Gagne and Briggs’ Three Levels of Instruction with Supporting
Activities chart could be considered for instruction of this cluster for your grade level.
o Consider prerequisite knowledge from other domains, clusters and/or standards.
o Identify the appropriate mathematical practices that must be incorporated in
instruction of the standards.
Record all information in Box G
What are the next steps?
Questions to consider:










Is this a new concept that has never been taught or introduced at our grade level?
Do we have the deep content knowledge to develop instructional lessons around this concept?
Who could help us gain the deep content knowledge that is needed?
As an individual, is there some deep content knowledge that I possess that could be shared with
others as my grade level or other grade levels?
Do we understand what is involved to support the integration of the mathematical practices
associated with this cluster?
What materials/supplies do we currently have available to support the teaching of the concept?
What resources (professional development, staff, materials, supplies, etc.) might we need to
enable us to teach this concept?
What common assessment (s) does our school or district possess to measure this standard?
What types of assessments might we need to measure this learning?
What do we anticipate to be challenging concepts for our students within this cluster?
Adapted from A Study of the Common Core State Standards developed by the Charles A. Dana Center at the University of Texas
at Austin
Instructional Alignment Chart (3-5)
Domain: Number and Operations -Fractions
A. Cluster for Grade/Course:
3.NF.A: Develop understanding of fractions
as numbers. (Grade 3 expectations in this
domain are limited to fractions with
denominators 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8). (1)
Understand a fraction 1/b as the quantity
formed by 1 part when a whole is partitioned
into b equal parts; understand a fraction a/b
as the quantity formed by a parts of size
1/b.(2a). Understand a fraction as a number
on the number line; represent fractions on a
number line diagram. Represent a fraction
1/b on a number line diagram by defining the
interval from 0 to 1 as the whole and
partitioning it into b equal parts. Recognize
that each part has size 1/b and that the
endpoint of the part based at 0 locates the
number 1/b on the number line.(2b).
Understand a fraction as a number on the
number line; represent fractions on a number
line diagram. Represent a fraction a/b on a
number line diagram by marking off a lengths
1/b from 0. Recognize that the resulting
interval has size a/b and that its endpoint
locates the number a/b on the number
line.(3a) Explain equivalence of fractions in
special cases, and compare fractions by
reasoning about their size. Understand two
fractions as equivalent (equal) if they are the
same size, or the same point on a number
line.(3b). Explain equivalence of fractions in
special cases, and compare fractions by
reasoning about their size. Recognize and
generate simple equivalent fractions, e.g., 1/2
= 2/4, 4/6 = 2/3). Explain why the fractions are
equivalent, e.g., by using a visual fraction
model.(3c.) Explain equivalence of fractions in
special cases, and compare fractions by
reasoning about their size. Express whole
numbers as fractions, and recognize fractions
that are equivalent to whole numbers.
Examples: Express 3 in the form 3 = 3/1;
recognize that 6/1 = 6; locate 4/4 and 1 at the
same point of a number line diagram.(3d)
Explain equivalence of fractions in special
cases, and compare fractions by reasoning
about their size. Compare two fractions with
the same numerator or the same denominator
by reasoning about their size. Recognize that
comparisons are valid only when the two
fractions refer to the same whole. Record the
results of comparisons with the symbols >, =,
or <, and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using
a visual fraction model.
B. Cluster for Grade/Course:
4.NF.A Extend understanding of fraction
equivalence and ordering. (Grade 4
expectations in this domain are limited to
fractions with denominators 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8,
10, 12 and 100).
1. Explain why a fraction a/b is equivalent to a
fraction (n × a)/(n × b) by using visual fraction
models, with attention to how the number and
size of the parts differ even though the two
fractions themselves are the same size. Use this
principle to recognize and generate equivalent
fractions.2. Compare two fractions with
different numerators and different
denominators, e.g., by creating common
denominators or numerators, or by comparing
to a benchmark fraction such as 1/2. Recognize
that comparisons are valid only when the two
fractions refer to the same whole. Record the
results of comparisons with symbols >, =, or <,
and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using a
visual fraction model.
C. Cluster for Grade/Course:
5.NF.A Use equivalent fractions as a
strategy to add and subtract fractions.
1. Add and subtract fractions with unlike
denominators (including mixed numbers) by
replacing given fractions with equivalent
fractions in such a way as to produce an
equivalent sum or difference of fractions
with like denominators. For example, 2/3 +
5/4 = 8/12 + 15/12 = 23/12. (In general, a/b +
c/d = (ad + bc)/bd.)
2. Solve word problems involving addition
and subtraction of fractions referring to the
same whole, including cases of unlike
denominators, e.g., by using visual fraction
models or equations to represent the
problem. Use benchmark fractions and
number sense of fractions to estimate
mentally and assess the reasonableness of
answers. For example, recognize an incorrect
result 2/5 + 1/2 = 3/7, by observing that 3/7 <
1/2.
Adapted from A Study of the Common Core State Standards developed by the Charles A. Dana Center at the University of Texas
at Austin
Instructional Alignment Chart (3-5)
D. Changes
E. Changes
F. Levels of Instruction
G. Implications for Instruction and Assessment
Adapted from A Study of the Common Core State Standards developed by the Charles A. Dana Center at the University of Texas
at Austin
Instructional Alignment Chart (3-5)
Domain: Measurement and Data (Example)
A. Cluster for Grade/Course:
3.MD.B: Represent and interpret data 3.
Draw a scaled picture graph and a scaled bar
graph to represent a data set with several
categories. Solve one- and two-step “how
many more” and “how many less” problems
using information presented in scaled bar
graphs. For example, draw a bar graph in
which each square in the bar graph might
represent 5 pets. 4. Generate measurement
data by measuring lengths using rulers marked
with halves and fourths of an inch. Show the
data by making a line plot, where the
horizontal scale is marked off in appropriate
units— whole numbers, halves, or quarters.
B. Cluster for Grade/Course:
C. Cluster for Grade/Course:
4.MD.B Represent and interpret data
5.MD.BRepresent and interpret data
4. Make a line plot to display a data set of
measurements in fractions of a unit (1/2, 1/4,
1/8). Solve problems involving addition and
subtraction of fractions by using information
presented in line plots. For example, from a line
plot find and interpret the difference in length
between the longest and shortest specimens in
an insect collection.
2. Make a line plot to display a data set of
measurements in fractions of a unit (1/2, 1/4,
1/8). Use operations on fractions for this
grade to solve problems involving
information presented in line plots. For
example, given different measurements of
liquid in identical beakers, find the amount
of liquid each beaker would contain if the
total amount in all the beakers were
redistributed equally.
D. Changes
Added eights when making, gathering and displaying line
plot data
E. Changes
Added multiplication and division of fractions when
solving problems using line plots
Scaled picture and bar graphs disappear
Moved from gathering data to solving problems using
information from the line plot
Added solving problems using line plots involving adding
and subtracting fractions
F. Levels of Instruction (4th Grade perspective)



Concept of 1/2 , 1/4, 1/8 should be taught at the reinforcement level since it first appeared in grade 3
Line plots should be instructed at the drill practice level
Solving problems involving adding/subtracting fractions should begin at the developmental and move to reinforcement
G. Implications for Instruction and Assessment (4th grade perspective)




Use what students know about number lines when creating the line plot for the measurement data
Use number lines to help students subdivide for halves and fourths to get to eights
Consider the learnings students are engaged in the Domain of Number and Operations- Fractions when planning
Identify the Standards for Mathematical Practice that will be used to approach the content.
Adapted from A Study of the Common Core State Standards developed by the Charles A. Dana Center at the University of Texas
at Austin
Instructional Alignment Chart (3-5)
Adapted from A Study of the Common Core State Standards developed by the Charles A. Dana Center at the University of Texas
at Austin
Download