ATOM The notion about splitting or division of matter to be smaller parts has been started since the Ancient Greek period. Philosophers, such as Aristotle and Democritus proposed their explanation independently about division of matter and particles composing them. According to Aristotle, the division of matter can be done continuously or in other words, matter can be divide until infinitely in the amount. Meanwhile, Democritus proposed an idea that the division of matter cannot be done continuously, it is because at certain time an indivisible part of the matter by using a term of atom. This term was derived from Latin, that is “atoms”, meaning “unable to be cut or split”. According to Democritus opinion, an atom was defined as a smallest part of matter or substance. Although, finally the Democritus’ opinion about atoms was proved incorrect, but in chemistry, the definition of atoms as the smallest particles of an element “it is still acceptable”. It is because atoms of an element show properties of the element. In other words, atoms of an element have identical properties with the element. Hence, the symbol of an atom is same as that of its element. For example, iron atom is symbolized by Fe, and the element of iron is also symbolized by Fe. Each element has different atoms to another elements. Nowadays, approximately 118 chemical elements have been found, so there are about 118 kinds of atoms which have been found by scientists. 1803 - John Dalton - Atomic Theory 1. 2. 3. 4. Matter is made up of indivisible atoms. All atoms of an element are identical. Atoms are neither created nor destroyed. Atoms of different elements have different weights and chemical properties. 5. Atoms of different elements combine in simple whole numbers to form compounds. Dalton's Atomic Theory It was in the early 1800s that John Dalton, an observer of weather and discoverer of color blindness among other things, came up with his atomic theory. Let's set the stage for Dalton's work. Less than twenty years earlier, in the 1780's, Lavoisier ushered in a new chemical era by making careful quantitative measurements which allowed the compositions of compounds to be determined with accuracy. By 1799 enough data had been accumulated for Proust to establish the Law of Constant Composition ( also called the Law of Definite Proportions). In 1803 Dalton noted that oxygen and carbon combined to make two compounds. Of course, each had its own particular weight ratio of oxygen to carbon (1.33:1 and 2.66:1), but also, for the same amount of carbon, one had exactly twice as much oxygen as the other. This led him to propose the Law of Simple Multiple Proportions, which was later verified by the Swedish chemist Berzelius. In an attempt to explain how and why elements would combine with one another in fixed ratios and sometimes also in multiples of those ratios, Dalton formulated his atomic theory. The idea of atoms had been proposed much earlier. The ancient Greek philosophers had talked about atoms, but Dalton's theory was different in that it had the weight of careful chemical measurements behind it. It wasn't just a philosophical statement that there are atoms because there must be atoms. His atomic theory, stated that elements consisted of tiny particles called atoms. He said that the reason an element is pure is because all atoms of an element were identical and that in particular they had the same mass. He also said that the reason elements differed from one another was that atoms of each element were different from one another; in particular, they had different masses. He also said that compounds consisted of atoms of different elements combined together. Compounds are pure substances (remember they cannot be separated into elements by phase changes) because the atoms of different elements are bonded to one another somehow, perhaps by hooks, and are not easily separated from one another. Compounds have constant composition because they contain a fixed ratio of atoms and each atom has its own characteristic weight, thus fixing the weight ratio of one element to the other. In addition he said that chemical reactions involved the rearrangement of combinations of those atoms. So that, briefly, is Dalton's theory. With modifications, it has stood up pretty well to the criteria that we talked about earlier. It did not convince everyone right away however. Although a number of chemists were quickly convinced of the truth of the theory, it took about a half century for the opposition to die down, or perhaps I should say die off. Let me point out again the difference between a model of atoms and a theory of atoms. A model focuses on describing what the atoms are like, whereas the theory not only talks about what the atoms are like but how they interact with one another and so forth. Dalton's model was that the atoms were tiny, indivisible, indestructible particles and that each one had a certain mass, size, and chemical behavior that was determined by what kind of element they were. We will use that model of an atom for now, but we will modify it considerably in a later lesson. 1897 - J.J. Thompson Found that cathode rays could be deflected by an electric field Showed that cathode "rays" were actually particles Found the charge to mass ratio of the particles to be approximately 108 Coulomb (C) per gram. Same charge to mass ratio regardless of metal used for cathode/anode or gas used to fill the tube. Conclusion: Particles were a universal component of matter. Electron - (originally called corpuscles by Thompson) particles given off by the cathode; fundamental unit of negative electricity Raisin Pudding Model o Matter is electrically neutral and electrons are much lighter than atoms. o Conclusion: There must be positively charged particles which also must carry the mass of the atom. Dalton's model is now incorrect because atoms are divisible. 1899 - Ernst Rutherford Studied absorption of radioactivity. Alpha radiation - positive charge - absorbed by a few hundredths of a cm or metal foil Beta radiation - negative charge - could pass through 100x as much foil before it was absorbed Gamma rays - no charge - could penetrate several cm of lead 1907-1911 - Rutherford updated Thomson's Raisin Pudding Model of the atom. Studied the deflection of alpha particles as they were targeted at thin gold foil sheets. o Most of the alpha particles penetrated straight through. o However few were deflected at slight angles. o Even fewer (only about 1 in 20,000) were deflected at angles over 90 . Rutherford's Atomic Theory was a revolutionary theory regarding the nature of atomic structure that varied significantly from past theories on the same subject matter. In fact, although the Rutherford Atomic Theory was first posited in 1911, many facets of it are still accepted by the majority of the scientific community 1885-1962 Niels Bohr The planetary model of the atom had two significant shortcomings. The first is that, unlike the planets orbiting the sun, electrons are charged particles. An accelerating electric charge is known to emit electromagnetic waves according to the Larmor formula in classical electromagnetism; an orbiting charge would steadily lose energy and spiral towards the nucleus, colliding with it in a small fraction of a second. The second problem was that the planetary model could not explain the highly peaked emission and absorption spectra of atoms that were observed. The Bohr model of the atom Quantum theory revolutionized physics at the beginning of the 20th century, when Max Planck and Albert Einstein postulated that light energy is emitted or absorbed in discrete amounts known as quanta (singular, quantum). In 1913, Niels Bohr incorporated this idea into his Bohr model of the atom, in which the electrons could only orbit the nucleus in particular circular orbits with fixed angular momentum and energy, their distances from the nucleus (i.e., their radii) being proportional to their respective energies.[22] Under this model electrons could not spiral into the nucleus because they could not lose energy in a continuous manner; instead, they could only make instantaneous "quantum leaps" between the fixed energy levels.[22] When this occurred, light was emitted or absorbed at a frequency proportional to the change in energy (hence the absorption and emission of light in discrete spectra).[22] Bohr's model was not perfect. It could only predict the spectral lines of hydrogen; it couldn't predict those of multielectron atoms. Worse still, as spectrographic technology improved, additional spectral lines in hydrogen were observed which Bohr's model couldn't explain. In 1916, Arnold Sommerfeld added elliptical orbits to the Bohr model to explain the extra emission lines, but this made the model very difficult to use, and it still couldn't explain more complex atoms. Modern Atomic Theory According to the development of science and technology, then the theories about atom also develops. Hence, in the next development Bohr’s atomic theory also has several weaknesses. The discovery of electrons, proton, and neutron bases the birth of the modern atomic theory. However, not all of the prior atomic theories are incorrect, it may be needed a given repairing and completing. Based on the modern atomic theory, atom is composed by the nucleus which is positively charged and electron orbiting the nucleus a certain path (atomic shell) and the electron has the wave properties. Basically, the modern atomic nucleus is the development of Bohr’s atomic theory contributed by many scientists, such as De Broglie, Wolfgang Pauli, Erwin Schrodinger, and Warner Heisenberg.