Human Resources Committee Paper Title: Annual Equality & Diversity Compliance Report (Part 1) Author: Abida Akram – Staff Development Advisor (Equality & Diversity) 1. Specific Decision Required by Committee To NOTE, DISCUSS and REFER to Council. 2. Relevance to University Strategy Directly relevant to the theme of “Investing in Staff”. Strategic Objectives met: 1.7 Embed equality and diversity principles in all our ways of working. 3. Executive Summary This report is part one of the progress on annual E&D compliance in regards to the Equality Act 2010. The more detailed part two will be presented at February HRC. This paper outlines our achievements to date and identifies any weaknesses in meeting the legal duties. Part 2 will comprise additional statistical analysis, to evidence compliance, as well as outlining new E&D objectives. The University is required to publish an annual report on compliance with the Public Sector Equality Duty in the Equality Act 2010 and the specific duty on publishing the E&D objectives every four years. The legal duty requires us to pay due regard to the following:1. eliminate discrimination, harassment, victimisation and any other conduct that is prohibited by or under the Act. 2. advance equality of opportunity between people who share a relevant protected characteristic and people who do not share it. 3. foster good relations between people who share a relevant protected characteristic and people who do not share it. A draft ‘Part 2 detailed paper will be published by the end of January 2016 along with the background statistical summaries. Once approved by HRC in February 2016 and full Council, It will be published by April 2016, thereby meeting both legal deadlines. An action plan will be formulated in order to deliver on the E&D objectives and success will be dependent on partnership working with Schools, Departments and the Student’s Union. It will supported by statistical analysis by the Planning Department. This information will then be made available to other committees and departments including Athena Swan. Contained within core budgets of Planning and HR Departments N/A 4. Essential Background Information 5. Risks, Risk Mitigation and Governance/ Accountability 6. Implications for other activities 7. 8. Resource and Cost Alternative Options considered 9. Other Groups/Individuals consulted. 10. Future Actions, Timescales & Frequency of Review by this Committee. 11. Success Criteria (KPIs) HR, Planning Dept, Academic Registry, Staff Support Groups. Annual updates at HR Committee meetings. Part 2 of the annual compliance report will be presented at February HRC. Legal duties and deadlines met. 1 Part One: Summary of Progress towards the Annual Compliance Report In 2015 the University improved on monitoring and gathering data in line with the Equality Act 2010 and is now conducting more detailed statistical analysis in order to better demonstrate our compliance with our legal duties (to be reflected in part two of the report in February 2016). The Planning department has recruited an additional Data Analyst and an Athena SWAN Planning Officer, who provides gender data as required to Schools/Depts. The analyses are then discussed at various committees/groups, such as Learning and Teaching, Student Recruitment and HRC as required. Some actions have already been identified and are being progressed currently, ie. Registry is looking at ensuring information on students with disabilities is more robust so that disclosure and reasonable adjustments are effectively recorded and made available for use at student appeals on degree outcomes. This is a two year project requiring a number of stakeholders to come together, agree and resource changes to any databases. The E&D Adviser is working with the Students Union to set up a steering group of Black and Ethnic Minority (BME) students to discuss support and identify actions around improving degree outcomes. Human Resources is providing staff data to the Planning Department so that Staff Reward outcomes can be analysed in more detail and also to increase gender information for Athena SWAN submissions. Reports are provided to Student Disciplinary Committee on issues regarding possible over-representation of BME and male students in respect of offences committed. The Race Charter report is on the agenda at this HRC meeting for discussion and decision. The Equal Pay report is on the agenda at this HRC for discussion and decision as it is one of the areas we are required to monitor, improve and publish information on. The E&D Adviser is working with Students Union and Centre for Academic Practice, to design and deliver E&D training to support culture change on becoming more inclusive and representative generally as well as dealing with complaints of sexual harassment more effectively. The Equality Challenge Unit (ECU) recommends that we monitor and publish the following information in relation to staff and service delivery if we are to comply with the Equality Act 2010 (please note our compliance status): Workforce Information: Compliance Evidence of impact analysis undertaken (e.g. EIA/EA) to establish how these have furthered the aims of the general public equality duty Some evidence but wider application required. We do not publish these due to confidentiality issues. E&D statistics published through the annual E&D statistical report. Details of information we have considered as part of the analysis 2 Details of engagement that we undertook with people who we considered have an interest in furthering the aims of the general public equality duty. Develop an equality profile of our staff at different grades/levels (e.g. women as cleaners or professors). Number of part/full- time by protected group (given that women usually make up the majority of part-time staff), Recruitment (& success rates of job applicants) Training (take-up) Performance assessments/reviews Promotion (applications for promotion and success rates) Redundancy Leavers (& reason why , such as, other reasons for termination like redundancy and retirement) Grievances Disciplinaries Reported incidents of harassment. Results of staff satisfaction surveys Rates of return to work of women on maternity leave (allowing us to check our rates compared to others in our sector) Contract & Casual workers Public office holders in our Board and/or committees. An indication of likely representation of sexual orientation providing that no-one can be identified as a result An indication of likely representation of religion and belief, providing that no-one can be identified as a result An indication of any issues for transsexual staff, based on our engagement with transsexual staff or voluntary groups, Gender pay information (& pay gap for other protected groups) Dismissals Applications for flexible working and success rates Yes. Through 10 staff support Groups/Networks. JNCC with Trade Unions. The Staff Survey. Athena SWAN work/surveys. Yes (through the Athena SWAN Charter and other HR reports). Yes as above. We have also set up, supported and consult with a Part-Time and Flexible Staff group. Yes. Yes. Yes – in process of embedding. Yes Yes Yes Yes but not by E&D. Yes but not by E&D. Yes but only by gender and by staff & student through the annual CONFIDE report. Yes. (next planned 2016) Yes. (Through Athena SWAN) Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Length of service/time on pay grade No. Yes. Held Locally. Need to improve recording as often agreed informally and orally. Yes. Service Delivery Information: Compliance Evidence of analysis undertaken (e.g. EIA/EA) to establish how these have furthered the aims of the general public equality duty Very occasionally, as in a tender, big capital project or a restructuring. Not published. Not published due to confidentiality issues. Yes, through NSS. (National Student Survey) Outreach & widening participation. Local surveys for Athena SWAN. New BME Student Steering group. Yes Yes Details of information we have considered as part of the analysis Details of engagement that we undertook with people who we considered have an interest in furthering the aims of the general public equality duty. Access Attainment levels & exam results 3 Satisfaction levels Exclusions Reports of bullying and harassment Drop-out rates The availability of and demand for child care support Deferments Conferring of qualifications Complaints (broken down by protected group, with an indication of reasons for complaints). Publish Annually in an accessible formats & languages Yes No Yes through CONFIDE. No Yes No No An annual report to Senate (by Registrar). Numbers too small to conduct E&D analysis. Yes. Only on request so as not to waste valuable resources. (No requests received over the past five years.) We are also expected to monitor by E&D characteristics in relation to the Research Excellence Framework (REF), and any procurement policy/strategy as well as provide information to HEFCE in regards to E&D on our staff and students annually as well as on our governance structure. Further improvement on are around representativeness at decision-making Committees, equality analysis (or impact) of policies/strategies/ decisions made on staff/services restructurings as well as on Performance & Development Reviews (PDRs) and exit interviews. These will take time to embed and for impact to be assessed. We will, eventually, be able to provide data and analysis by all nine protected characteristics. At present, we can provide reports by age, disability, ethnicity and gender but with only very limited information by sexual orientation, religion or belief and pregnancy and maternity. As the statistical analysis is developed, further actions and objectives will be identified and these will be presented to HRC at the February 2016 meeting in a detailed annual compliance report part two. This will thereby be in compliance with the legal duty of identifying objectives every four years and publishing them by April 2016. 4