Dr.A.DAYALAN, Former Prof & Head, B.V Eq (03-Different Over-potential,η) 18 M.Sc (Chemistry) ELECTRODE KINETICS – ELECTRODICS-I 03-DISCUSSION OF BUTLER-VOLMER EQUATION For different values of Case-(i) : = 0 ; BV equation reduces to Nernst equation. kc A+e ka D (kc = Cathodic & ka = Anodic rate constants] At equilibrium (the system is not disturbed by external force i.e., no external emf), the rates forward and reverse reactions are equal i.e., no net reaction .Therefore there is no net current. i.e., i = ia-ic = 0 Therefore, (ia / ic ) = 1 ……………………………………………………..(1) But, ic= nF(kbT/h) e-∆G*chem./RT e-∆e F/RT e -F/RT [A] = nF kc e -∆e F/RT[A] ia= nF(kbT/h) e∆G*chem./RT e(1-)∆e F/RT [D] = nF ka e (1-)∆e F/RT[D] Therefore, (ic / ia) = (kc/ka) e -∆e F/RT {[A] / [D]} = Ke -∆e F/RT{[A] / [D]}= 1 Hence, -∆e F / RT = -ln K + ln {[D] / [A]} ………………………………….(2) But, ∆Go= -RT ln K = - nFE = -∆oe F Hence, -RT ln K = -∆oe F Therefore, substituting for ln K = -∆oe F/ RT in equation- (2) & rearranging we get i.e., ∆e = ∆oe – (RT/F)ln {[D] / [A]} Nernst Equation Case-(ii): 0.01 V, Low field approximation – LFA (Concept of polarisabilty) i = 2io Sinh(F/2RT) (BV equation for = 0.5) = 2io (F/2RT); [Sinhx = x if x1 ; NB: Use a calculator, calculate & see] = (RT/ ioF) i similar to Ohm’s Law(V=IR). Hence, resistance = RT/ ioF Dr.A.DAYALAN, Former Prof & Head, B.V Eq (03-Different Over-potential,η) ∂ RT ---- = ----- = ρ ∂i ioF 0 as io 19 ∞ (Non polarisalble) Despite the passage of current across the electrode, the polarisabilty, (∂/∂i) remains constant, the over potential tends to be zero & the interface remains at equilibrium. On the other hand, ρ 0 as io ∞ (Polarisalble) The potential departs from equilibrium even for a small passage of current across the electrode, the polarisabilty, (∂/∂i) tends to infinity & the interface remains away from equilibrium. UPPER LIMIT OF LFA F/2RT << 1 ; i.e., << 2RT/F or << 0.05 V (Best < 0.01) @ For an electrode to be non-polarisable, = 0. This will be possible only if io = infinity which is not. @ Hence, all electrodes show some degree of polarization. NB: Greater the value of io greater is the non-polarisability. Exchange current densities, io and symmetry factor, for some electrodes at 25°C System Medium Mercury H+/H2 H2SO4 7.9 x10-13 0.50 Lead H+/H2 H2SO4 5.01 x 10-12 - Nickel H+/H2 H2SO4 6.3 x 10-6 0.58 Tungsten H+/H2 H2SO4 1.25 x 10-6 - Platinum H+/H2 H2SO4 7.9 x 10-4 - Gold H+/H2 H2SO4 2.51 x 10-4 - Mercury Cr3+/Cr2+ KCl 1 x 10-6 - Platinum Ce4+/Ce3+ H2SO4 3.98 x 10-5 0.75 Iridium Fe3+/Fe2+ H2SO4 1.58 x 10-3 - Rhodium Fe3+/Fe2+ H2SO4 1.73 x 10-3 - H2SO4 H2SO4 KCl 2.51 x 10-3 6.3 x 10-3 0.58 Platinum Fe3+/Fe2+ Palladinum Fe3+/Fe2+ Calomel Hg, Hg2Cl2 io Metal Highly polarisable. Does not allow charge (e-) to pass through - Dr.A.DAYALAN, Former Prof & Head, B.V Eq (03-Different Over-potential,η) Discharge of H+ is difficult on Hg surface = (RT/ ioF) i Ohm’s Law. Resistance = RT/ ioF Non-polarisable. = 0 : i.e., io = infinity, which is not-All electrode are polarizable . Lesser the value of io greater is the polarisability .:. Hg/H2/H+ electrode-Highest degree of polarisability (it does allow charge to flow through). Calomel electrode is an example of a typical non-polarisable electrode. Case(iii): = 0.01- 0.1 V: B.V Equation to be used as it is TAFEL EQUATIONS Case-v): > 0.1 V High field approximations. HFA (Tafel Equations)- Experimental determination of io and v(a) is highly positive, i = ia = io e(1-)F/RT [Anodic] Plot i vs +ve ln i = (1-)F/RT + ln io Plot ln i vs +ve values. Evaluate, io & (1-) 20 Dr.A.DAYALAN, Former Prof & Head, B.V Eq (03-Different Over-potential,η) v(b) is highly negative, i = ic = io e -F/RT [Cathodic] ln i = -F/RT + ln io Plot ln i vs -ve values. Evaluate, io & UPPER LIMIT OF HFA e F/2RT > e -F/2RT Let e -F/2RT < 1 % e F/2RT < 10-2 e F/2RT 10-2 e F/2RT > e -F/2RT e F/2RT > 100 e -F/2RT F/2RT > ln100 -F/2RT F/RT > ln100 > (RT/F)ln100 > 0.25V ( ok even for > 0.1) HW: Work out for (i) e -F/2RT < 5 % e F/2RT < 10-2 e F/2RT (ii) e -F/2RT < 0.1 % e F/2RT < 10-2 e F/2RT 21 Dr.A.DAYALAN, Former Prof & Head, B.V Eq (03-Different Over-potential,η) 22 ALL THE ABOVE CASES for OVER POTENTIALS CAN BE SUMMARISED AS FOLLOW DIFFERENT CASES A comparative study of the plot of i vs , for all possible , indicating ia. ic & i = ia – ic (repeated) NB: (i) ic or ia will be zero only at infinite magnitude of (ii) ic = ia = io at equilibrium. = 0 (iii) Deviations occur only after equilibrium depending on the value of (iv) ia will be zero (no anodic tendency) only at -ve infinite potential (v) Similarly ic, win be zero (no cahodic tendency) only at +ve infinite potential Dr.A.DAYALAN, Former Prof & Head, B.V Eq (03-Different Over-potential,η) 23 CONDITION FOR ELECTRODE DEPOSITION ∆e = Equilibrium potential for the process considered = ∆ - ∆e = - ve cathodic process ∆e = Cathodic equilibrium potential; = ∆ - ∆e = + ve anodic process ∆e = Anodic equilibrium potential; (a) Consider the discharge (reduction) of aq. 1.0 M Cu2+ = ∆ - ∆e = ∆- 0.34 < 0 for cathodic; ∆ < 0.34V i.e., the discharge of Cu2+ can occur even at no applied or +ve applied potential but less than 0.34 V w.r.t SHE H.W: Calculate the applied potential for the discharge of 0.01M Cu2+. (Hint: Use Nemst eq for getting ∆e). (b) Consider the discharge (reduction) of aq. 1.0 M Na+ = ∆ - ∆e = ∆- (-2.71) = ∆ +2.71 < 0 for cathodic; ∆ < - 2.71 V i.e., the discharge of Na+ can occur only at -ve applied potential and that too less than - 2.71 V. H.W: Calculate the applied potential for the discharge of 0.01M Na+. (Hint:Use Nernst eq for getting ∆) (c) Consider the following process at 1.0 M aq solutions (reduction) ½ Cl2 + e Cl - ; SRP = +1.36 V ; Cathodic must be –ve = ∆ - ∆e = ∆ - (+1.36) = ∆-1.36 < 0 for cathodic; ∆ < 1.36 V i.e., the reduction of Cl2 w.r.t SHE can occur even without any applied potential or at any -ve applied potential. Cl- ½ Cl2 + e; SOP = -1.36 V ; Anodic must be + ve = ∆ - ∆e = ∆ - (-1.36) = ∆ + 1.36 > 0 for anodic; ∆ > - 1.36 i.e., the discharge of Cl- w.r.t SHE can occur only at an applied potential of -1.36 V or more.