Analytic assessment grid for content, language and cooperative work
Criteria
C
O
N
T
E
N
T
L
A
N
G
U
A
N
G
E
5
excellent
Has acquired all the basic
concepts and principles of
the topic. Well structured,
correct and
comprehensive
explanation; excellent
personal evaluation.
4
good
Has acquired most of
the basic concepts and
principles of the topic.
Generally well
structured, correct and
adequate explanation;
good personal
evaluation.
3
satisfactory
Has acquired some basic
concepts and principles
of the topic. Sufficient
explanation, with a
limited number of errors;
limited personal
evaluation.
2
almost satisfactory
Has acquired only a
few basic concepts
and principles of the
topic. The
explanation shows
major deficiencies in
terms of logical
structuring and
formulation.
Application of
knowledge to
new situations
(how it relates)
Creativity/evalu
ation
Has used new knowledge
with confidence and
creativity, applying it in an
original way.
Has shown critical
thinking, creativity and
initiative.
Has used new
knowledge and applied
it correctly in new
situations.
Has shown a good level
of creativity and
evaluation capability.
Has used new basic
concepts and applied
them in simple situations.
Use of language
-listening
-speaking
-reading
-writing
-interaction
Consistent grammatical
control and appropriate
use of vocabulary. Can
express him/herself with
a natural flow and
interact with ease.
Good grammatical
control and generally
appropriate use of
vocabulary. Can
express him/herself
and interact with a
good degree of
fluency.
A few mistakes in
grammar and vocabulary
use do not lead to
misunderstanding. Can
express him/herself and
interact with a
reasonable degree of
fluency.
Has used a few
simple concepts and
applied them when
guided.
Has not always
shown sufficient
evaluation ability and
has presented poor
creativity.
Systematically makes
mistakes in grammar
and vocabulary use
but the message is
generally clear. Can
manage the
discourse and the
interaction with
effort and must be
helped.
Cooperative
work
Original and creative.
Good level of
interaction.
Sufficient degree of
interaction.
Use of basic
subject concepts
and knowledge
(what)
From Assessment and Evaluation, editor Franca Quartapelle, Ibis, 2012.
Has shown sufficient
evaluation capability and
sometimes original ideas.
Partial cooperation.
1
unsatisfactory
Hasn’t acquired any
of the basic concepts
and principles of the
topic. The
explanation is
severely deficient in
terms of logical
structuring and
formulation; no
personal evaluation.
Hasn’t achieved any
knowledge.
Has shown inability
to evaluate and very
poor creativity.
Systematic grammar
mistakes and the
narrow range of
vocabulary makes
the message
meaningless.
Communication is
totally dependent on
repetition,
rephrasing and
repair.
Unable to work in
group.
Score