Water Safety Plan Guide Treatment Processes – Ozone Disinfection Version 1, Ref P7.3 January 2014 Citation: Ministry of Health. 2014. Water Safety Plan Guide: Treatment Processes – Ozone Disinfection, Version 1, ref p7.3. Wellington: Ministry of Health. Published in January 2014 by the Ministry of Health PO Box 5013, Wellington, New Zealand ISBN: 978-0-478-42744-8 (print) ISBN: 978-0-478-42745-5 (online) Previously published in 2001 as Public Health Risk Management Plan Guide: Treatment Processes – Ozone Disinfection, Version 1, ref p7.3. This publication’s title and any reference within the text to ‘public health risk management plan’ were changed in January 2014 to reflect the December 2013 legislation change of the term ‘public health risk management plan’ to ‘water safety plan’. No other changes have been made to this document. This document is available at: www.health.govt.nz This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. In essence, you are free to: share ie, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; adapt ie, remix, transform and build upon the material. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence and indicate if changes were made. Contents Introduction 1 Risk Summary 2 Risk Information Table 3 Contingency Plans 6 Water Safety Plan Performance Assessment 7 Appendix P7.3 8 Ref P7.3 Version 1, January 2014 Water Safety Plan Guide: Treatment Processes – Ozone Disinfection iii Introduction Ozone is used to disinfect, or oxidise contaminants in, drinking-water. This Guide is concerned only with using ozone as a disinfectant. If an event occurs during ozonation (ie, the process doesn’t work properly), the following could happen: If there is not enough ozone added to the water, germs can cause sickness High concentrations of by-products from ozonation can cause sickness, even when ozone concentrations are acceptable. The on-site generation and use of ozone can present risks to the health of treatment plant staff. These are acknowledged, but are not discussed further as such risks are the subject of health and safety in employment legislation. The ozonation process and the risks associated with it cannot be viewed in isolation. This Guide only looks at the ozonation of the water. Ozone’s value as a disinfectant is also affected by elements of the water supply system dealt with in other Guides. Several factors influence how effective disinfection is: ozone concentration how long the ozone is in contact with the water (see Guide D1) water temperature turbidity of the water when the ozone is added to it; this can hinder the access of ozone to germs (see the S1, P1, P5 and P6 series of Guides) pH of the water; this may affect how much of the ozone is in a form that is good at killing germs (see Guide P8.1). If the whole ozonation process is going to work as well as possible, all these factors have to be taken into consideration. Ozone does not last long in water. Another disinfectant with a longer lifetime, such as chlorine, chloramine or chlorine dioxide, should be added after ozone to kill any germs that may get into the water after the ozone has decayed away. Ref P7.3 Version 1, January 2014 Water Safety Plan Guide: Treatment Processes – Ozone Disinfection 1 Risk Summary The event creating the greatest risk involved in ozonising drinking-water is not having enough ozone in the water during the contact period to kill germs (see P7.3.1). The most important preventive measures are: monitor the process to be sure there is enough ozone in the water, regardless of how the quality of the incoming water might change (see P7.3.1.4) put an alarm on the ozone generator to let you know if the generator fails (see P7.3.1.6) monitor the pH of the treated water; use a properly calibrated pH probe (see P8.1.1.2 and P8.1.1.3). (References in parentheses are to the Risk Information Table.) 2 Water Safety Plan Guide: Treatment Processes – Ozone Disinfection Ref P7.3 Version 1, January 2014 Risk Information Table Reliable information about water quality is essential for the proper management of a water supply. Knowledgeable and skilled staff are also essential for minimising the public health risks associated with water supplies. Please read the staff training (Guide G1) and the monitoring guides (Guide G2). While we haven’t pointed out every detail of how these documents are linked with the present document, the links are many and are important. Abbreviations: DWSNZ – Drinking-Water Standards for New Zealand Causes Preventive measures Checking preventive measures What to check Corrective action Signs that action is needed Event: OZONE CONCENTRATION TOO LOW Possible hazards: Germs not killed. Level of risk: High1 P7.3.1.1 Ozonator or dosing controller malfunction. P7.3.1.2 Dosing controller’s sensor incorrectly calibrated. Routine maintenance. Microbiological quality. Ozone concentration after contact period. Replacement of controller if suspect. Alarm system to warn of inadequate ozone concentration. Humidity of air entering generator. Ensure air used as the feed gas is properly dried before injection into the generator. Regular manual checks on calibration of sensor (see DWSNZ:2000, Section 3.3.4.7). Microbiological quality. Ozone concentration after contact period. 1 Maintenance log. Calibration log. Low ozone residual (see Appendix). Identify cause of fault and rectify. E. coli or coliforms detected in 100 mL of treated water. Manually dose reservoir with chlorine until repaired. Ozonator/ controller failure. Replace ozonator/ controller. Frequent maintenance needed. Maintenance log not signed. Water vapour levels in feed gas above those recommended by the manufacturer. Identify reason for air drier not working, and rectify. Low ozone residual (see Appendix). Re-calibrate sensor. E. coli or coliforms detected in 100 mL of treated water. Increase ozone dose rate until re-calibration undertaken. Calibration schedule not signed off. The consequences of the event, and therefore the level of risk, will be influenced by the quality of the source water, the effectiveness of treatment processes prior to the ozonation process, and whether a residual disinfectant is added to the water following ozonation. Ref P7.3 Version 1, January 2014 Water Safety Plan Guide: Treatment Processes – Ozone Disinfection 3 Causes Preventive measures Checking preventive measures What to check Corrective action Signs that action is needed Event: OZONE CONCENTRATION TOO LOW cont’d P7.3.1.3 Dosing controller set to deliver the wrong ozone concentration. P7.3.1.4 Incorrect dose calculation. P7.3.1.5 High ozone demand coupled with poor dose control. P7.3.1.6 Adequate checks on ozone concentration at the sampling point designated in DWSNZ: 2000 (sections 3.3.1.2.3 and 3.3.4.7) especially during periods of water quality variability. Microbiological quality. Ozone concentration after contact period. Independent check on calculations (especially after a system change and expected dose rates are uncertain). Use a dose control method that links dose control to ozone residual at the sampling point designated in DWSNZ: 2000 (Sections 3.3.1.2.3 and 3.3.4.7). Adjust ozone dose controller setting. E. coli or coliforms detected in 100 mL of treated water. Frequent calculation errors found by checks. Re-calculate dose rates and change settings. Calculation checks not signed off. Train staff in making dose calculations. E. coli or coliforms detected in 100 mL of treated water. Replace dose controller with more suitable unit. Low ozone residual (see Appendix) during periods of poor water quality. Manual monitoring and manual ozone control during poor water quality episode. Upstream processes removing substances contributing to the ozone demand from the water. TOC/colour levels highly variable. Optimise upstream processes to reduce ozone demand. Ensure ozonator has sufficient capacity. Inadequate ozone dose even when ozonator running at maximum. Replace ozonator with one with sufficient capacity. Stand-by generator. Electricity supply. Poor continuity of power supply. Refuel generator (if appropriate). Ensure that contactor design has been proven effective elsewhere before construction/ installation. Ozone concentration after contact period. Low ozone residual (see Appendix). Calculated contact time. E. coli or coliforms detected in 100 mL of treated water r. Obtain engineering advice to assess what modifications can be made to improve contactor design. Poor contractor design 4 Ozone concentration after contact period. Low ozone residual (see Appendix). Power failure. P7.3.1.7 Dose calculation. Undertake pilotscale testing of contactor before construction. Water Safety Plan Guide: Treatment Processes – Ozone Disinfection Ref P7.3 Version 1, January 2014 Causes Preventive measures Checking preventive measures What to check P7.3.1.8 Determine whether there is a need to pH control prior to the contactor, and install if necessary. Provide staff training in sample analysis and record keeping. Develop monitoring schedule and roster. Provide staff training in sample analysis and record keeping. Water pH too high (favours rapid decomposition of ozone). P7.3.1.9 Ozone monitoring samples taken incorrectly, or incorrectly recorded (see Guide D4). P7.3.1.10 Method of ozone measurement incorrect, incorrectly calibrated, or analysis reagents have deteriorated. Corrective action Signs that action is needed Ozone concentration after contact period. Low ozone residual (see Appendix). Introduce a system for pH adjustment. E. coli or coliforms detected in 100 mL of treated water. Analysis records. Audits show monitoring inaccuracies. Identify staff training needs and provide training. Analysis records. Audits show monitoring inaccuracies. Identify staff training needs and provide training. Event: EXCESSIVE FORMATION OF OZONATION BY-PRODUCTS Possible hazards: Bromate, bromoform (and other organic DBPs containing only bromine), formaldehyde. Level of risk: Low–moderate2 P7.3.2.1 Natural organic matter and/or bromide present in the water being ozonated. 2 Provision of treatment processes upstream to reduce levels of organic matter in the water. Adjustment of water alkalinity to minimise bromate formation. TOC/colour. Bromide. Elevated TOC/ colour and/or bromide. Elevated disinfection by-product formation. Optimise upstream processes to maximise organic matter removal. The concentrations of disinfection by-products formed, and therefore the risk they present, will depend on the amount of natural organic matter in the water. Ref P7.3 Version 1, January 2014 Water Safety Plan Guide: Treatment Processes – Ozone Disinfection 5 Contingency Plans If an event happens despite preventive and corrective actions you have taken, you may need to consult with the Medical Officer of Health to assess how serious a problem is. Event – Ozone concentration is lower than minimum acceptable level Indicators: Required actions: Responsibility: 6 A detectable ozone residual cannot be obtained in the water at the outlet of the contact tank, and the disinfectant used to provide a disinfecting residual cannot be detected in the water leaving the treatment plant. In 100 ml samples of water leaving the treatment plant, E. coli or coliforms continually detectable, or is present at elevated levels (more than 10 per 100 mL). Both the ozoniser and residual disinfectant dosing system are not operational. Widespread illness in the community. Follow the actions given in Figure 3.2 of the DWSNZ:2000. Manually dose chlorine into the post-treatment reservoir until the disinfecting systems are operational again. Identify the reason for the failure and rectify. Record cause of system failure and steps taken to correct. Modify water safety plan if necessary. Manager designated responsible for the water supply. Water Safety Plan Guide: Treatment Processes – Ozone Disinfection Ref P7.3 Version 1, January 2014 Water Safety Plan Performance Assessment To make sure that your supply’s water safety plan (formerly known as a Public Health Risk Management Plan, PHRMP) is working properly, periodic checks are needed. The overview document outlines what needs to be done. The following table provides the detailed information for checking this particular supply element. What to measure or observe: Ozone concentration at contact tank outlet. E. coli (faecal indicator) or coliforms (bacteria not killed). Follow the protocols set out in DWSNZ:2000. Note that the presence of faecal indicators may be influenced by factors other than the adequacy of the ozonation process (eg, the pH control). How often: For the monitoring frequencies for FAC and E coli. Measurements see DWSNZ:2000 Section 3.3.2. What to do with the results: Results need to be recorded to meet legislative requirements or to allow water safety plan performance assessment. The WINZ database is good for this. The collected data need to be periodically reviewed to see whether problems with this supply element are developing. This should be done as frequently as the manager responsible considers necessary to minimise risk to public health arising from this supply element. Should this review show any unusual incidents, indicate that proper procedures are not being carried out, highlight poor laboratory results or indicate that poor water quality is reaching customers, then review the procedures for managing ozonation. Evaluate the monitoring results, and any actions taken as the result of having to implement a contingency plan, to see if the water safety plan needs modification – eg, preventive measures are up to date; the contingency plan steps are still adequate; and changes to the treatment processes are recognised in the plan. Responsibility: Ref P7.3 Version 1, January 2014 Manager designated responsible for the water supply. Water Safety Plan Guide: Treatment Processes – Ozone Disinfection 7 Appendix P7.3 Table P7.3: C.t values (mg.min/L) for inactivation of Cryptosporidium by ozone* Temp (°C) 99% 99.9% 0.5 57.9 83 5 32.5 46.6 10 17.5 25.1 15 9.6 13.8 20 5.39 7.73 25 3.08 4.42 30 1.79 2.96 * From Table 13.1 of the Drinking-Water Standards for New Zealand 2000. 8 Water Safety Plan Guide: Treatment Processes – Ozone Disinfection Ref P7.3 Version 1, January 2014