Analysis case ‘Noble wines’ 1) CONTEXT The social service department of your organization offers interesting discounts and promotions from suppliers on their website. The suppliers contact the social service department. If there are no objections, the social service department puts the promotion on the website to offer to all employees of your organization. The social service department has a number of criteria on the basis of which offers from suppliers can be refused, e.g. no discriminating or sexually tinged offers… One of the suppliers is Noble Wines. Noble wines is a secondary activity of one of the employees of your organization. Noble Wines asks to put his offer of a 15% discount on all wine purchases on the website of the social service department, so all employees of the organization could profit from this discount. Is the offer of Noble Wines suitable to put on the website of the social service department? 2) ANALYSIS 2.1. stakeholders/persons involved + their interests Stakeholders/persons involved Social service department - As a whole - The head of the department (responsible for the department) Their interests -Image/reputation (equality, alcohol and drugs policy) -objectivity/neutrality/ equal treatment of suppliers and customers -tasks and objectives of the social service department (criteria for offers of suppliers, alcohol and drugs policy of the organization) The employee who has Noble Wines as -financial/commercial interest double interest secondary activity (double role: employee and as a employee as a supplier. Thanks to the fact supplier) that he works for your organization he could have an advantage that other suppliers do not have because he can directly approach his colleagues to promote his wines Other suppliers -inequality (the other suppliers can also ask to put their discounts and promotions on the website of the social service department but they cannot approach the employees directly. The colleagues of the employee who runs Noble Wines might feel obliged to buy from him) Customers of the social service department -financial/commercial interest (discount), equal and impartial treatment, client service of the social service department Employees of your organization who do not have -equal treatment is jeopardized a secondary activity and cannot sell any products or services via the website of the social service department Superior of the employee who runs Noble Wines -the superior is responsible for giving permission The organization Competent minister Trade unions to the employee to combine a secondary activity with his job as a civil servant. -superior is responsible for the efficient and proper functioning of his team (has to take into account the possible impact of the secondary activity on the job and duties at the public service; impact on the other colleagues if the employee in question might not perform to standard as a cause of his secondary activity) Image/reputation (cumulation of activities of employees: possible abuse of job at the public service to the advantage of the secondary activity , alcohol and drugs policy) Imago/reputation for minister is ultimately accountable and might have to respond in the media Do not like existing benefits for the employees of the organization to be cut or limited 2.2. Possible alternatives Do not make any changes, the offer of Noble Wine scan be put on the website of the social service department. Equal treatment: whether the suppliers are employees of the own organization or not, does not make a difference. All suppliers that work for the own organization, are allowed to put their offers on the website of the social service department, in view of equal treatment. Introduce an extra criterium: suppliers who works for the own organization are not allowed to put their offers on the website of the social services, in view of equal chances for all suppliers and employees. Introduce an extra criterium: no offers related to alcohol or drug in keeping with the alcohol and drugs policy of the organization The social service department actively looks for and approaches suppliers to have a broad and varied range of offers on its website (is this the main task of the social service department?) Do not offer any discounts or promotions anymore on the website of the social service department. 2.3. Choice & what values are decisive?