CurvatureintheSinglePolarizationECEVacuum-3

advertisement
Curvature in the Single Polarization ECE Vacuum
Proof that for single polarization ECE fields that the only non-zero curvature solutionsd to the ECE
vacuum equations are Beltrami.
The ECE vacuum for a single state of polarization is given by
𝑩 = ∇×𝑨−𝝎×𝑨 = 𝟎
𝑬
𝟐
(1)
πœ•π‘¨
= −∇πœ™ + πŽπœ™ = −πœ”0 𝑨 − πœ•π‘‘ = 0
(2)
For the sake of simplicity, the vacuum state label has been omitted from the variables.
Let us look first at non-Beltrami solutions.
The single polarization curvature is
𝑹𝑠𝑝𝑖𝑛 = ∇ × πŽ
π‘Ήπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘ = −∇πœ”π‘œ −
(3)
πœ•πŽ
πœ•π‘‘
(4)
From (2)
𝝎=
∇πœ™
(5)
πœ™
Substituting this into (3)
𝑹𝑠𝑝𝑖𝑛 = ∇ ×
∇πœ™
(6)
πœ™
This can be written
𝑹𝑠𝑝𝑖𝑛 = ∇ × ∇πΏπ‘œπ‘”(πœ™) = 0
(7)
The only possible non-zero solution for 𝑹spin is a Beltrami solution.
To see if this is true for π‘Ήπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘ , we take the dot product of (4) with 𝑨 to give
π‘Ήπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘ βˆ™ 𝑨 = −∇πœ”π‘œ βˆ™ 𝑨 −
πœ•πŽ
πœ•π‘‘
βˆ™π‘¨
(8)
Now
−∇πœ”π‘œ βˆ™ 𝑨 = −∇ βˆ™ (πœ”π‘œ 𝑨) − πœ”π‘œ ∇ βˆ™ 𝑨
(9)
Using (2)
−∇πœ”π‘œ βˆ™ 𝑨 =
πœ•∇βˆ™π‘¨
πœ•π‘‘
− πœ”π‘œ ∇ βˆ™ 𝑨
or
πœ•
πœ•π‘‘
−∇πœ”π‘œ βˆ™ 𝑨 = (
− πœ”π‘œ ) ∇ βˆ™ 𝑨
(10)
Further
πœ•πŽ
πœ•π‘‘
βˆ™π‘¨=
πœ•(πŽβˆ™π‘¨)
−
πœ•π‘‘
πœ•π‘¨
𝝎 βˆ™ πœ•π‘‘
(11)
which from (2) becomes
πœ•πŽ
πœ•π‘‘
βˆ™π‘¨=
πœ•(πŽβˆ™π‘¨)
−
πœ•π‘‘
πœ•
πœ”π‘œ 𝝎 βˆ™ 𝑨 = (πœ•π‘‘ − πœ”π‘œ ) 𝝎 βˆ™ 𝑨
(12)
Therefore
πœ•
π‘Ήπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘ βˆ™ 𝑨 = − (πœ•π‘‘ − πœ”π‘œ ) (∇ βˆ™ 𝑨 + 𝝎 βˆ™ 𝑨)
(13)
From the tetrad postulate, this is the sum of the spatial terms along the diagonal for the 𝜞 connection, so
that because of antisymmetry of 𝜞
∇βˆ™π‘¨+πŽβˆ™π‘¨=𝟎
(14)
Therefore
π‘Ήπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘ βˆ™ 𝑨 = 𝟎
(15)
We can take the cross product of equation (4) with 𝑨
π‘Ήπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘ × π‘¨ = −∇πœ”π‘œ × π‘¨ −
πœ•πŽ
πœ•π‘‘
×𝑨
(16)
This can be rewritten as
π‘Ήπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘ × π‘¨ = −∇πœ”π‘œ × π‘¨ −
πœ•πŽ×𝑨
πœ•π‘‘
+𝝎×
πœ•π‘¨
πœ•π‘‘
(17)
Using equations (1) and (2), this is
π‘Ήπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘ × π‘¨ = −∇ × πœ”π‘œ 𝑨 + πœ”π‘œ ∇ × π‘¨ −
πœ•πŽ×𝑨
πœ•π‘‘
− πœ”π‘œ 𝝎 × π‘¨ = −∇ ×
πœ•∇×𝑨
πœ•π‘¨
+
πœ•π‘‘
πœ•π‘‘
=0
(18)
Examining equations (15) and (18) we see that if π‘Ήπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘ is both parallel and perpendicular , therefore π‘Ήπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘
must be zero if is not a Beltrami solution.
We will confirm now that 𝑹𝒐𝒓𝒃
and π‘Ήπ’”π’‘π’Šπ’ are Beltrami.
By equation (5) and the fact that ∇πœ™ is Beltrami (see note at end)
∇ × π‘Ήπ‘ π‘π‘–π‘› = ∇ × ∇ × πŽ = ∇ × ∇ ×
∇πœ™
πœ™
1
= ∇ × (πœ™ ∇ × ∇πœ™ +
∇πœ™
πœ™
1
× ∇πœ™) = πœ…∇ × πœ™ ∇ × ∇πœ™
(19)
This reduces to
∇ × π‘Ήπ‘ π‘π‘–π‘› = πœ…∇ × πŽ = πœ…π‘Ήπ‘ π‘π‘–π‘›
So that 𝑹𝑠𝑝𝑖𝑛 is Beltrami.
If we take the curl of equation (4)
(20)
−∇ × π‘Ήπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘ = ∇ × (−∇πœ”π‘œ −
πœ•πŽ
)
πœ•π‘‘
= (−∇ × ∇πœ”π‘œ −
πœ•∇×𝝎
πœ•π‘‘
)
(21)
But, we can write
πœ•∇×𝝎
πœ•π‘‘
πœ•
= πœ… πœ•π‘‘ 𝝎
(22)
so that
−∇ × π‘Ήπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘ = −πœ…
πœ•
𝝎
πœ•π‘‘
− ∇ × ∇πœ”π‘œ
(23)
By examining equation (27) we see that if ∇πœ”π‘œ is Beltrami, then so is 𝑹𝒐𝒓𝒃.
We note that
(∇ × ∇πœ”π‘œ ) βˆ™ 𝑨 = ∇ βˆ™ (∇πœ”π‘œ × π‘¨) + ∇πœ”π‘œ βˆ™ ∇ × π‘¨
(24)
and that
∇ × πœ”π‘œ 𝑨 = (∇πœ”π‘œ × π‘¨) + πœ”π‘œ ∇ × π‘¨
(25)
If we take the divergence of this we have
∇ βˆ™ (∇πœ”π‘œ × π‘¨) = −∇ βˆ™ (πœ”π‘œ ∇ × π‘¨)
(26)
so that equation (24) becomes noting that 𝑨 has a Beltrami solution,
(∇ × ∇πœ”π‘œ ) βˆ™ 𝑨 = −∇ βˆ™ (πœ”π‘œ ∇ × π‘¨) + ∇πœ”π‘œ βˆ™ ∇ × π‘¨ = −∇ βˆ™ (πœ”π‘œ πœ…π‘¨) + ∇πœ”π‘œ βˆ™ πœ…π‘¨
(27)
From equation (2) and that
∇βˆ™π‘¨=0
We
πœ•π‘¨
∇ βˆ™ (πœ”π‘œ 𝑨) = −∇ βˆ™ πœ•π‘‘ = 0
(28)
So that equation (27) becomes
(∇ × ∇πœ”π‘œ ) βˆ™ 𝑨 = ∇πœ”π‘œ βˆ™ πœ…π‘¨
(29)
or
(∇ × ∇πœ”π‘œ − πœ…∇πœ”π‘œ ) βˆ™ 𝑨 = 𝟎
This suggests that if 𝑨 is not perpendicular to ∇πœ”π‘œ then ∇πœ”π‘œ satisfies the Beltrami equation.
To see that this is the case, we expand
∇ × (πœ”π‘œ ∇ × π‘¨) = ∇πœ”π‘œ × ∇ × π‘¨ + πœ”π‘œ ∇ × ∇ × π‘¨
Since A is Beltrami, this can be rewritten
(30)
∇ × (πœ…πœ”π‘œ 𝑨) = ∇πœ”π‘œ × πœ…π‘¨ + πœ”π‘œ ∇ × πœ…π‘¨ = ∇πœ”π‘œ × πœ…π‘¨ + πœ”π‘œ πœ… 2 𝑨
Since 𝑨 is Beltrami, so is its time derivative, and then by equation (2), so is πœ”π‘œ 𝑨 thus
∇πœ”π‘œ × πœ…π‘¨ = 𝟎
This proving that
There ∇πœ”π‘œ is parallel to 𝑨 ∇πœ”π‘œ satisfies the Beltrami equation.
Conclusions:
We conclude therefore that both π‘Ήπ’”π’‘π’Šπ’ and 𝑹𝒐𝒓𝒃 satisfy the Beltrami equation, and that the only
non-zero curvature solution to the ECE vacuum equations are Beltrami.
Proof that 𝛁𝝓 is Beltrami:
From (2)
∇ × ∇πœ™ = ∇ × πŽπœ™
But using standard vector expansion,
∇ × πŽπœ™ = πœ™∇ × πŽ + ∇πœ™ × πŽ
Again, using equation (2)
∇πœ™ × πŽ = ∇πœ™ ×
∇πœ™
πœ™
=0
Thus
∇ × πŽπœ™ = πœ™∇ × πŽ
We have from previous papers that
∇ × πŽ = πœ…πŽ
We thus have that
∇ × πŽπœ™ = πœ…πœ™πŽ
and so by equation (2)
∇ × πŽπœ™ = πœ…∇πœ™ .
Q.E.D.
Download