Notes_04_03 1 of 9 Two-Dimensional Kinematics Position x i ri q i y i i i ri P ri A i s i ' P x i P x i C i y i y i Si S i x i ' P C i y i s i P A i s i ' P s i ' P A i T s i P C i A i S i S i C i Velocity r q i i i ri P ri A i s i ' P A CS i i Bi Si C i i i C i i Bi i R A i S i C i R A i A i R S i ri P ri i Bi s i ' P ri i R A i s i ' P Acceleration r qi i i ri P ri A i s i ' P 0 1 1 0 R R 2 1 0 0 1 Notes_04_03 2 of 9 A R A i i i A R A R A i i i i i A R A R R A i i i i i i A B A 2 i i i i i ri P ri i Bi s i ' P i 2 A i s i ' P Jerk r qi i i riP ri A i s i ' P A B A 2 i i i i i A B B 2 A A 2 i i i i i i i i i i A B R A 2 A A 2 i i i i i i i i i i A B R R A 2 A R A 2 i i i i i i i i i i i i A B 3 A 3 i i i i i i i Snap q r i i i r r A s ' P i i i P i A B 3 A 3 i i i i i i i A 3 B B 3 2 i i i 3 i i i i i 2 i A i 3 ii A i 3 i i A i Notes_04_03 3 of 9 A 3 B RA 3 A 3 A 3 A A 3 B R RA 3 A 3 A 3 RA A 6 B 4 3 A 2 i i i i i i i i 3 i i i i i i i i 2 2 i i i i 3 i 2 i i i i i i i i i i 4 i i i Partial derivatives ri P ri A i s i ' x i P x i C i P y i y i S i P r r 1 0 r r S i C i C i x i ' P P P Bi s i ' S i y i ' P i xi P i i P i yi 0 1 P i ri S i x i ' P C i y i ' P 1 0 I 2 0 1 r qi i i r r r P i P qi i r I P i qi P ri 2 i i Bi s i ' P i i 2 i 2 i i r P i qj 0 2 x 3 i i i i i Notes_04_03 4 of 9 Although there are no formal definitions for terminology, higher derivatives of position are often denoted as snap (fourth derivative), crackle (fifth derivative) and pop (sixth derivative). While snap has been considered in the fields of unmanned air vehicle (UAV) trajectory planning [18], biomechanics [19, 20], hand writing analysis [21] and astrophysics [22], effectively no snap kinematics have been presented for multibody chains. [18] Mellinger, D., and Kumar, V., 2011, “Minimum Snap Trajectory Generation and Control for Quadrotors”, IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, p. 2520-2525, Shanghai, China. [19] Wiegner, A.W., and Wierzbicka, M.M., 1992, "Kinematic Models and Human Elbow Flexion Movements: Quantitative Analysis”, Exp. Brain. Res., 88:665-673. [20] Novak, K.E., Miller, L.E. and Houk, J.C., 2000, “Kinematic Properties of Rapid Hand Movements in a Knob Turning Task”, Exp. Brain Res., 132:419–433. [21] Edelman, S., and Flash, T., 1987, “A Model of Handwriting”, Biol. Cybern. 57: 25-36. [22] Russo, J.G., and Townsend, P.K., 2009, “Relativistic Kinematics and Stationary Motions”, J. Physics A: Math. Theory. 42-445402. Angular jerk of the output link for the four bar is shown in Fig. 2. Error between the explicit geometric jerk solution and the numerical jerk simulation is provided in Fig. 3 for assembly tolerance used to terminate the iterative Newton-Raphson numerical position solution of 1.0e-12. Root-mean-square error (RMSE) for this jerk simulation was 1.7e-13. Angular snap of the output link for the four bar is shown in Fig. 4. Error between the explicit geometric snap solution and the numerical snap simulation for the same assembly tolerance is provided in Fig. 5 with RMSE of 1.1e-12. Similar results were observed for the inverted slider crank with both drivers. When RMSE for snap is normalized by the maximum absolute value for snap and compared to similar normalized errors for velocity, acceleration and jerk, all are approximately the same as shown in Fig. 6. Normalized RMSE between explicit geometric solutions and planar numerical simulations was strongly related to assembly tolerance for values larger than 1.0e-11 also shown in Fig. 6. List of Figures Figure 1 – Four bar and inverted slider crank planar mechanisms Figure 2 – Angular jerk for the output link of the four bar mechanism Figure 3 – Jerk error between explicit geometric solution and numerical simulation for the output link of the four bar mechanism Figure 4 – Angular snap for the output link of the four bar mechanism Figure 5 – Snap error between explicit geometric solution and numerical simulation for the output link of the four bar mechanism Figure 6 – Normalized RMSE for planar four bar numerical simulation Notes_04_03 Figure 1 – Four bar and inverted slider crank planar mechanisms Figure 2 – Angular jerk for the output link of the four bar mechanism 5 of 9 Notes_04_03 6 of 9 Figure 3 – Jerk error between explicit geometric solution and numerical simulation for the output link of the four bar mechanism Notes_04_03 Figure 4 – Angular snap for the output link of the four bar mechanism 7 of 9 Notes_04_03 8 of 9 Figure 5 – Snap error between explicit geometric solution and numerical simulation for the output link of the four bar mechanism Notes_04_03 Figure 6 – Normalized RMSE for planar four bar numerical simulation 9 of 9