ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT FOR SETSOTO REGIONAL BULK WATER SUPPLY SCHEME FREE STATE CHIEF DIRECTORATE: BULK INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAMME PERIOD: 01 APRIL 2013 TO 31 MARCH 2014 2 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Background 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 3. Progress to date 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.6 4. Description of project Project History Project concept, design and plan Start date – duration of the programme Fund previously allocated to project Implementation of approved business plan Schedules of work and phasing of the activities Risks taken and management thereof Capacities dedicated to the programme Key challenges within the project Project result and beneficiaries 4.1 4.2 Outcomes and outputs Beneficiaries and project results. 5. Conclusions / Lessons Learned 5.1 Main successes and failures of the project to date 5.2 Ownership and sustainability of infrastructure works 6. Recommendations ANNEXURE A: Project Implementation Photos ANNEXURE B: List of villages expected to benefit from Phase 1 ANNEXURE C: Details of contracts awarded under Phase 1 ANNEXURE D: Project schedule ANNEXURE E: Details of job opportunities APRIL 2014 3 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME 1. APRIL 2014 INTRODUCTION In terms of Section 10(7)(b) of the Division of Revenue Act (DoRA), Act No 2 of 2013 as promulgated in Government Gazette No 36555 dated 10 June 2013 the transferring national officer must submit an annual performance report for Schedule 5, and 6 programmes within four months in respect of a province and six months in respect of a municipality after the end of the financial year to the National Treasury. The Regional Bulk Infrastructure Grant (RBIG) is a Schedule 6 indirect conditional grant for the benefit in kind of municipalities. The objective therefore is to provide an annual performance report of projects that are funded through the Regional Bulk Infrastructure Grant, in compliance with the Division of Revenue Act, 2013. The objective of this evaluation is to determine whether the progress on the project is commensurate with the expenditure to date as well as to determine whether the project is still on course in terms of the original planning. This performance evaluation report, covering 12 months for the 2013/14 fiscal year is for the Setsoto Regional Bulk Water Supply Scheme, one of the Regional Bulk Infrastructure Grant projects, currently being implemented by the Setsoto Local Municipality, with Department of Water Affairs (DWA) as funder. 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 Description of Project Setsoto Local Municipality is part of the Thabo Mofutsanyane District Municipality in the Free State. The Setsoto Local Municipality has been experiencing severe water shortages in the towns of Clocolan, Marquard and Senekal and has to consider options to ensure the provision of sufficient and sustainable potable water systems in the future, over both the short and longer term. Various options were discovered that would cover Senekal and to augment an existing system that would cover Ficksburg, Clocolan and Marquard. The Senekal solution options were: Ground Water Assessment within a 10 km Radius of Senekal The pumping of clean water from the Bethlehem Water Purification Plant The pumping of raw water from the Rosendal Dam in Rosendal if the dam construction is approved The raising of the Sandspruit Weir by 3.5 meters for additional 2.2 million cubic meters of storage. The Ficksburg, Clocolan and Marquard solution options were: Ground Water Assessment with a 10 km radius of each town The raising of the Meulspruit dam by 2 meters The storage of additional water in the Rosendal Dam if approved The pumping of water from the Caledon River to the Meulspruit Dam with Diversion to Clocolan and Marquard. 4 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME 2.2 APRIL 2014 Project history The Setsoto Bulk Water Supply Scheme is implemented to ensure a sustainable and long-term solution for the water supply problems that had been experienced in the Ficksburg, Clocolan, Marquard and Senekal areas. The supply problems in Setsoto are due to low rainfalls, high level of siltation in the raw water supply dams, Meulspruit in Ficksburg, Moperi Dam in Clocolan, Newu Hoop Dam in Marquard, Sand River Weir and Sandspruit Weir in Senekal. Senekal has insufficient raw water storage facilities and very old water treatment works in Senekal, constructed in 1961, 1974 and 1991. The first two being the most problematic when there was a break down due to obsolete mechanical and electrical equipment. In Ficksburg, Clocolan and Marquard the problem is mainly due to low rainfall in the area causing the dams and the Caledon River to dry up. Due to the acute water shortages that have led to some communities of Senekal and Marquard protesting violently and destroying municipal property, which also led to the death of a community member Mr Tatane, short to medium term options were also investigated which led to the drilling of boreholes in all four mentioned towns. It is understood that these boreholes are only meant to augment the surface water systems during the dry periods but, by themself, do not have enough capacity to provide the long term supply solutions. The Municipality also embarked on upgrading and refurbishing various bulk water facilities through the Municipal Infrastructure Grant. For example, the upgrading of the Ficksburg Water purification Plant, the Upgrading of the Marquard Water Purification plant and the completion of the Clocolan to Marquard Raw Water Supply line. The projects for supply of portable water planned to be sufficient till year 2030 are still on the planning and approval phases and these are the major projects being funded through the Regional Bulk Infrastructure Grant. Figure 1: Locality Plan 2.3 Project concept, design and plan The purpose of the Setsoto Regional Bulk Scheme is to provide the four towns of Setsoto LM with potable water e.g. the towns are Ficksburg, Clocolan, Marquard and Senekal. 5 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME APRIL 2014 Each town with its on water supply requirements for now and in 20 years time, the planning commenced in 2009 therefore the 2010- 2030 period is applicable. Below is a table indicating the Population figures and water demand requirements for each town in 2010 and 2030 as mentioned already: Table 1: Population figures TOWN Population Figures ATRS 2010 Population Figures ATRS 2030 Demand 2010 (million m3/annum) Demand 2030 (million m3/annum) FICKSBURG CLOCOLAN MARQUARD SENEKAL 36895 16117 13795 27453 46486 22676 17386 33848 2.72 1.26 1.02 4,75 4.84 2.81 1.84 9,74 The targeted categories of consumers to be supplied with portable water are domestic users, commercial and light industrial and institutional users in all the four towns mentioned above. The methodology that was adopted in the Feasibility Study stage of the RBIG project was to review the existing raw water and portable water systems throughout the four towns, secondly to review and identify what other water supply initiatives and projects were already being implemented by the Municipality and external funders, e.g. MIG through COGTA. It became clear at this stage that the existing systems, both raw water and portable water, would not meet the water demands in 20 years time from 2010 of all four towns. The municipality continued to implement some short term to medium term projects whilst the RBIG project was still in feasibility approval stage, e.g. the construction of boreholes in Senekal through MIG funding and the upgrading of the portable water reservoirs in Ficksburg, the upgrading of the water purification plant in Marquard, the installation of boreholes also in Ficksburg, Clocolan and Marquard. The conclusions and recommendations drawn from the feasibility studies were the following: Ficksburg gets is raw water supply from the Caledon River and it is augmented by water from the Meulspruit Dam. However, in 2030 both these supply systems will not be sufficient to meet the demand as depicted in the population and demand table above. A recommendation was made to look at alternative options for raw water supply: 1. 2. 3. First was the possibility of raising the Meulspruit Dam by two meters Second was the construction of the Rosendal Dam under the Dihlabeng Local Municipality RBIG projects and jurisdiction Lastly was the Supply of Raw Water from the Caledon River to Meulspruit Dam through a pump station and pipeline system. This last option was the one considered after many deliberations concerning the other two options. It is the system that would also address the Clocolan and Marquard demand shortages in the long term as it would augment the already existing systems 6 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME APRIL 2014 and utilise part of the infrastructure already installed from Meulspruit Dam to Clocolan WPP then to Marquard WPP. Clocolan has two raw water supply systems namely, the Moperi Dam and a pipeline T-off from a supply system that starts in Meulspruit through a series of pump stations, rising mains, balancing tanks and pipe systems mentioned above. The major problem experienced by Clocolan is that when there is low rainfall in the area, first the Moperi dam runs empty then eventually the bigger Meulspruit Dam follows suit as was seen during the summer of 2011 and 2012. Once these two dams reach a level below the extraction outlet then these systems become ineffective to supply. Figure 1: Moperi Dam Figure 2: Meulspruit Dam Marquard is supplied on a similar system as Clocolan, its primary raw water supply system is the Nuwe Hoop Dam and Lucretia Earth Dam augmented by the same pipeline system from Meulspruit. Similarly when this town experiences low rainfalls, the two dams dry up and consequently when the Meulspruit dries up, there is severe water shortage in the area similar to Clocolan. The town of Senekal is on a completely different system and has different problems altogether. Senekal has two supply systems, first being the supply from the Sand River weir into the Cyferfontein Earth Dam. This raw water supply system also runs empty and the water purification plants are very old with obsolete components of 1961, 1974 and 1991. The old plants present a very high risk when there is a mechanical or electrical breakdown acquisition of spares which has proved to be very difficult. 7 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME APRIL 2014 / Figure 3: Cyferfontein Dam 1. 2. 3. 4. Figure 4: De Put Dam Our recommendation on this system has been the upgrading of the oldest WPP. The second system is on the Sandspruit or Sandsloot stream. Similarly on this system water is pumped from the weir into the De Put Earth Dam. On a number of occasions at least twice since our appointment the river to Earth Dam pumps and transformer have been stolen and vandalised. This has left the municipality without raw water supply for over six months causing severe water shortages. Water could not be pumped into the earth dam, and thus the dam ran empty and no water could be pumped to the Deput Purification plant. This happened during the heavy rainy season and an opportunity was lost to extract water from the Sandspruit stream, leaving the earth dam empty when the dry season arrived. The third water purification plant purifying water from this De-Put system is also very old, underperforming and requires a major upgrade. Lastly, the Senekal portable water reservoirs only have a 9 Mℓ storage capacity which only lasts for about 24 hrs. This is half of what is recommended for. Our recommendations for Senekal was for a Hydrology Study to be undertaken to first determine if the existing infrastructure and catchment arrears could be improved to deal with the current to 2030 demands. Sinske consult (a hydrology specialist) was appointed in August 2012 and in February 2013 his study was completed indicating that the best possible solution for Senekal was the raising of the Sandspruit Weir by 3.5 meters to create another holding raw water reservoir and increase the weir capacity from 47 million litres to 2.2 million cubic litres Therefore, four categories of projects were identified and prioritised: Ground Water Assessment and Installation A decision was taken to conduct ground water assessments within a radius of 10 km in each town, including Municipal land and private land where agreements were reached. Geohydrological Specialists would be appointed and Contractors would be appointed where the studies confirmed water bearing structures of a sustainable level. These GWA’s were conducted in all four towns and resulted in boreholes being drilled and equipped in the four towns of Ficksburg, Clocolan, Marquard and Senekal 8 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME APRIL 2014 Raw Water Supply Systems: Various Options Identified Raising of the Meulspruit Dam by 2 meters, this option was not feasible due to the foundations conditions of the current dam. The design and construction of the Rosendal Dam to primarily supply the Dihlabeng towns of Rosendal and Paul Roux. The remaining capacity would be in storage and through controlled spillages would be used to augment the capacity of Meulspruit Dam. The extraction and supply of raw water from the Caledon Dam to the Meulspruit Dam. This system was further confirmed by the study done by WRP who were appointed by MOL PRO Consulting to look at the availability of water in the Caledon River system and the impact of drawing more water from other streams. This system would constitute an extraction pump station, sand removal and a rising main of three kilometres to the Meulspruit Dam. It would then augment the shortage of supply to Ficksburg, Clocolan and Marquard through the pump stations and piping systems to all of the three towns. The second raw water supply project is in Senekal. First option being the original supply of water from the Dihlabeng Water purification plant via a series of rising mains, gravity mains and pressure tanks over a distance of approximately 80 km, Second was the supply of raw water from the Rosendal Dam via a series of pump stations, rising mains, gravity mains, and pressure tanks over a distance of approximately 40 km. Lastly, as recommended through the hydrological study conducted in Senekal in 2012, the raising of the Sandspruit Weir by 3.5 meters would increase the storage capacity from 47 million litres to 2.2 million cubic litres. This would turn this weir into another major raw water storage facility. At completion of the raising of the dam, a new pump station and piping system would be constructed to supply an upgraded or new Water Purification Plant with a minimum of 6.4 Mℓ/day. Bulk Portable Water Systems (Short to Medium Term Solutions) The initial recommendation is to upgrade the oldest 1961 Cyferfontein Water Purification Plant and get it to operate at the design capacity of 3.2 Mℓ/day. Do repair and maintenance of the mechanical equipment and concrete structures on the second 1991 Cyferfontein Water Purification Plant to bring it to the design capacity of 3.2 Mℓ/day. Bulk Portable Water Systems (Long Term Solutions) 2.4 Increase the capacity of the portable water storage tanks from current 9 Mℓ holding capacity to 18 Mℓ Capacity for the 48 hr storage recommendation Consider the combination of all three old and semi-new water purification plants into one 9 Mℓ purification plant at a central position between the two raw water and purification systems situated almost 12 km apart; convert the current clean water piping systems from Cyferfontein to raw water supply systems. The benefit of this option being the upgrading of the obsolete purification plants with assured spares availability and renewed operating and maintenance procedures. Start date duration of the program: The four Thabo Mofutsanyana forum of Municipal Managers appointed Mol Pro Consulting amongst other consultants in March 2009 to complete the Feasibility 9 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME APRIL 2014 Study on the Setsoto Water Requirements. At completion of the FS and the IRS in October 2010, a budget of R89 million was estimated. 2.4 In June 2011 Setsoto and DWA appointed Bloem Water as its implementing agent for the installation of boreholes in Ficksburg, Clocolan and Marquard and Isa and Partners in Senekal In June 2012 Setsoto appointed Mol Pro Consulting as its service provider for the implementation of the RBIG projects as per the annual budget allocation; the estimated time always depends on the available budget of that fiscal year. Annually DWA advises the Setsoto Local Municipality of its allocation and budget for that financial year. The start of construction projects will only be known when all necessary WULA and Dam Construction approvals have been finalised. Funds previously allocated to project Table 2 indicates funds previously allocated. Table 2: Funding for the past 3 financial years 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 Approved budget R10 000 000 R10 000 000 R10 000 000 amount Spent budget R13 650 200 R9 994 778 R3 999 921 amount 2014/15 TOTAL R20 000 000 R44 000 000 0 R27 644 899 The Co-funding streams are: 3. Local Municipality (MIG) Province (DWA) : R151 009 115 (Water Supply projects only) : R89 000 000 (RBIG Projects) PROGRESS TO DATE The Performance evaluation was conducted on the 10th of April 2014 by a team consisting out of the following people: 3.1 T Mohapi M Manyama R Gilmer STR Ramakarane T Mokhethoa A Nontsimi S Dlamini T Moletsane S Magagula DWA RBIG National office DWA RBIG Regional office FS DWA RBIG Regional office FS Setsoto Local Municipality Setsoto Local Municipality Setsoto Local Municipality MISA Setsoto MOL PRO Consulting Pty Ltd JIS Environmental Engineers Implementation of the approved business plan In its capacity as Implementing Agent, Setsoto Local Municipality has appointed its own staff through the Project Management Unit (PMU) to provide specialised professional services, financial management and administrative support to the project. 10 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME APRIL 2014 In March 2009 the forum of Municipal Managers in the Thabo Mofutsanyana District appointed a Consortium of Professional Service Providers to undertake Regional Feasibility and Implementation readiness studies for the four municipalities namely Setsoto, Dihlabeng, Phumelela and Nketoana Local Municipalities. MOL PRO Consulting was assigned by the Setsoto Local Municipality. The Feasibility Study and IRS was conducted and completed in September 2010. The Studies and a budget of R89 million (RBIG) was estimated and other (MIG) funded to the value of R152 million were also estimated in October 2010. At the completion and approval of the FS and IRS however, Mol Pro Consulting services were deemed to have been completed, and it was mentioned that the appointment of implementing agents was not automatic. In April 2011 Setsoto Local Municipality, DWA (Provincial) and Bloem Water reached a tripartite agreement and Bloem Water was appointed as the implementing agent to utilise a portion of the RBIG funds to install Boreholes in the Ficksburg, Clocolan and Marquard towns. This was to assist and address the acute shortage of water supply from the surface water systems due to drought. In June 2012, Mol Pro Consulting was re-appointed by Setsoto Local Municipality in agreement with DWA to be the implementing service provider for the projects that were originally recommended in the feasibility study and IRS. Below are two tables indicating further activities and specialist, sub consultancy appointments by Mol Pro Consulting approved by the Setsoto Local Municipality. Table 3: Milestones Raising of the Sandspruit Weir – De Put Table 3: indicates the milestones of the raising of the Sandspruit Weir one of the long term solutions for the water supply of Senekal. Planned date for Name of Organization completion Product compiling/ developing FS/IRS/Design/EIA Feasibility Study Mol Pro Mar 2010 at De Put which is Date FS/IRS/Design/EIA approved Oct 2010 Implementation Readiness Study Mol Pro Sep 2010 Oct 2010 Hydrological Studies Sinske Consult July 2012 Feb 2013 Preliminary Design Mol Pro / Arq Consulting Engineers Aug 2013 In Process EIA JISE Environmental Engineers May 2013 Aug 2013 WULA JISE Environmental Engineers Feb 2013 In Process Designs Mol Pro/ ARQ Consulting Engineers At WULA Approval 11 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME APRIL 2014 Caledon to Meulspruit raw water pipeline Table 4 indicates the milestones of the Caledon to Meulspruit pipeline which will address the long term supply of Ficksburg, Clocolan and Marquard. Table 4: Milestones Planned date for completion FS/IRS/Design/EIA Mar 2010 Sep 2010 Date FS/IRS/Design/EIA approved Oct 2010 Oct 2010 Caledon River WRP Consulting System Analysis Feb 2013 Mar 2013 Preliminary Design Mol Pro/ V&V Consulting Mar 2013 Mar 2013 EIA JISE Environmental Engineers Mar 2013 May 2013 WUL JISE Environmental Engineers Feb 2014 In Process Design Mol Pro / V&V Consulting Engineers At WULA Approval Product Feasibility Study Implementation Readiness Study Name of Organization compiling/ developing Mol Pro Mol Pro Currently the Caledon – Meulspruit project is in the WULA approval stage, the environmental Specialist JISE is addressing some further queries and requirements as issued by the Department. Designs are complete and as soon as WULA approval is obtained, the municipality can go out on construction tender. The EIA approval of the raising of the Sandspruit Weir in De Put was obtained much later in the 2013 year (August 2013) in September 2013 ARQ consulting, (Specialist Dam Engineers with APP’s) were appointed due to the complexity of the dam design. Further studies and detailed Geotechnical investigations were conducted. These were completed at the beginning of December 2013, thereafter, and an Options Analysis Report was compiled and submitted. One option was identified and selected as the most possible option which met all the minimum requirements for design, construction and safety. This was the option upon which the detailed designs and design report, cost estimation and implementation program has been drawn. At submission of WULA application in August 2013, DWA made it clear through a letter written to the EIA specialists that the WULA application will only be further processed / approved once DWA as received detailed designs of the raising of the wall. In February 2013 the detailed designs and design report were completed and submitted to the following Institutions: Setsoto Local Municipality and DWA (Provincial) for their assessment and comment as well as the WULA requirements stipulated in September 2013. 12 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME APRIL 2014 The National Dam Safety Office accompanied by the application to construct the dam. The DSO has corresponded that it requires the WULA approval to process the permit to construct. There has been no further correspondence on the WULA submission although the correspondence on the Technical side is in progress. 3.2 Schedules of work and phasing of the activities There are two major components of projects running in parallel to complete all the required approval processes. Setsoto Local Municipality has however indicated that in the order of priorities that the Senekal Solution is more critical and takes first priority. Phase 1 was the installation of boreholes in Ficksburg, Clocolan, Marquard and Senekal including the other MIG funded projects. The agreed Senekal Solution will be considered as Phase 2 of the scheme. Phase 3 will be the construction of the Caledon to Meulspruit pipeline. 3.3 Risks taken and management thereof As the Scheme comprises new infrastructure, no risks has been encountered yet. However when the project reaches the construction phase a detailed risk analysis and risk management plan will have to be undertaken. 3.4 Capacities dedicated to the programme The capacities dedicated to the programme are as follows: 3.5 Water Services Authority – Setsoto Local Municipality Water Services Provider – Setsoto Local Municipality Funding Authority – DWA – RBIG & COGTA - MIG Regulator – DWA. Overall Programme and Project Management – Setsoto Local Municipality (PMU) Specialized professional services, financial management and administrative support – Setsoto Local Municipality. Planning, Design, contract administration – various professional service providers; Mol Pro Consulting, Sinske Consult, Van Breda and Associates, Geodetic South Africa, JIS Environmental Engineers, WRP Consulting, ARQ Consulting Engineers, V and V Consulting Engineers and GHT. Construction work: Boreholes – Bloem Water (2011), Boreholes (2012) GHT, AB Pumps, Construction of the security building for the stolen pumps and transformer on De Put, Mol Pro Con Architects, C-Pac Pumps and Lonestar Construction. No contractor appointments have been made on the Caledon to Meulspruit pipeline as well as the raising of the Sandspruit Weir projects. Key challenges within the project 13 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME APRIL 2014 In the Feasibility Study, the costing of the projects was in 2010 monitory value but the implementation of projects may take longer and the original cost estimates may be slightly different due to annual price increases. Setsoto has had acute water shortages which resulted in alleviating some of the RBIG funds to assist in sorting out the short term crisis issues. The legislative approval processes are lengthy and no construction can take place unless approvals are obtained from the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism and the Department of Water Affairs. The Geotechnical investigation and additional surveying on the De Put Dam project took longer than originally anticipated thus delaying the submission of the designs and design report by two months. The submission of the WULA application for the Caledon to Meulspruit pipeline by the Environmental Specialist has also taken much longer than anticipated. 4. PROJECT RESULTS AND BENEFICIARIES 4.1 Outcomes and outputs Currently the expected outputs are no longer on track as it was planned and anticipated that in this financial year 2014/15 all approvals would have been completed and that the municipality would have gone on tender in April, latest by June 2014. Construction can not start until this phase is concluded. 4.2 Beneficiaries and project results As stated in previous sections, the ultimate aim of the total scheme is to supply sufficient water to these communities of Setsoto, the planning horizon being 20 years. 4.3 Ficksburg/ Meqheleng - 36 865 people Clocolan/ Hlohloloane – 16 117 people Marquard Moemaneng – 1 3795 people Senekal / Matwabeng – 27 453 People Jobs Created None on the major projects yet. 5. CONCLUSION / LESSONS LEARNED 5.1 Main successes and failures of the project to date It can be said that the EIA permits which are foundations and cornerstones of this projects have been obtained, however, the challenge or the failure is not obtaining the WULA approvals within the 2013/14 financial year. 5.2 Ownership and sustainability of infrastructure All infrastructures already installed e.g. boreholes, pumps and piping networks, extraction pumps and transformers, security buildings, and future installations, these are ultimately all properties of the Setsoto Local Municipality. 14 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME APRIL 2014 It is imperative that the Municipality is actively involved at all the stages of the project from planning to construction and operation. To date the municipality has demonstrated commitment to the project. The processes of planning design and application for approvals are lengthy and no matter how frustrated or impatient the communities or various stakeholders get, these processes will not be bypassed. Any means to assist in speeding up the processes will be sought. 6. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that urgent attention be paid to the key challenges listed under Section 3.5 above. In particular the approval of the WULA application for the raising of the weir project as it is a pre-requisite for the DSO to grant the permit to construct and the approval of the dam design. The completion and addressing of WULA queries on the Caledon to Meulspruit pipeline project. 15 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME ANNEXURE A: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PHOTOS Completed Phase 1 Projects: Commissioned Borehole Pump stations in Clocolan Commissioned De Put Raw Water extraction Pump Station with Transformer. APRIL 2014 16 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME APRIL 2014 Vandalised Pump Station with missing Transformer and Pumps before construction above. ANNEXURE B: LIST OF TOWNS AND TOWNSHIPS EXPECTED TO BENEFIT Ficksburg/ Meqheleng - 36865 people Clocolan/ Hlohloloane – 16117 people Marquard Moemaneng – 13795 people Senekal / Matwabeng – 27453 People 17 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME APRIL 2014 ANNEXURE C: DETAILS OF CONTRACTS AWARDED UNDER PHASE 2 (NON YET) CONTRACT NO. AND NAME NOTE: * ** CONTRACTOR CONTRACT VALUE (incl. VAT) CONTRACT AWARD / START DATE Retention monies withheld have been included as expenditure. All figures include 14% VAT. Estimated completion value. Estimated revised completion date. PLANNED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE EXPENDITURE AS AT 31 DEC 12 (incl. VAT) % COMPLETION 18 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME ANNEXURE D: PROJECT SCHEDULE APRIL 2014 19 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME APRIL 2014 ANNEXURE E: DETAILS OF JOB OPPORTUNITIES Summary of Decent Job Opportunities Decent job opportunities for people employed at various occupational levels: Decent = Full time for at least 5 months or more Clerical Ongoing Clerical New Labourers Ongoing Labourers New Managerial Ongoing Managerial New Semi-Skilled Ongoing Semi-Skilled New Skilled Ongoing Skilled New Supervisor Ongoing Supervisor New Other Ongoing Other New TOTAL Ongoing TOTAL New Decent job opportunities for the financial year 2013/14 No Adult Men Person Actual Days cost on job opportunit ies No Adult Women Person Actual Days cost on job opportuni ties No Youth Men Person Actual Days cost on job opportuni ties No Youth Women Person Actual Days cost on job opportuni ties No Disabled Person Actual Days cost on job opportuni ties No TOTAL Person Actual Days cost on job opportunit ies 20 REGIONAL BULK INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAMME APRIL 2014 Summary of Temporary Job Opportunities Temporary job opportunities for people employed at various occupational levels: Temporary = Less than 5 months Temporary job opportunities for the financial year 2013/14 Adult Men No Person Days Actual cost on job opportuni ties Adult Women No Person Days Actual cost on job opportun ities Youth Men No Person Days Actual cost on job opportunit ies Youth Women No Person Days Actual cost on job opportun ities Disabled No Person Days Actual cost on job opportuni ties TOTAL No Perso n Days Actual cost on job opportuni ties Clerical Ongoing 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 Clerical New 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 Labourers Ongoing 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 Labourers New 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 Managerial Ongoing 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 Managerial New 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 Semi-Skilled Ongoing 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 Semi-Skilled New 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 Skilled Ongoing 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 Skilled New 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 Supervisor Ongoing 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 Supervisor New 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 TOTAL Ongoing 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 TOTAL New 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0 0 0 R0