Name: ____________________________________
Writing Style
0-40 pts.
Referencing
0-50 pts.
Social
Assessment
Not Competent
Minimally competent
Acceptable
Above Average
Exceptional
*Writing style has significant
deficits, including, but not
limited to: mechanics,
vocabulary, sentence
structure, subject-verb
agreement, sentence
fragments and/or run-on’s.
*Sources not cited
*Insufficient number of
sources
*incorrect citation style used
*May contain systematic errors
*Sentence structure likely to be
too simplistic and choppy.
*May contain excessive amounts
of extraneous information.
*May have only a limited sense of
purpose or intent.
*Sources cited, but citation style
may not be consistent
*Minimum number of sources
met, although some may not be
appropriate or of sufficient quality
* Information accurate, but not
always complete.
* Information too simplistic
* Demonstrates only limited
understanding of content material
*Writing style competent
*Writing relatively error
free
*Sentence structure shows
some attempt at complexity
*Writing style reasonably welldeveloped
*Sentence structure generally
complex
*Avoids use of slang
*Smooth transitions between sections
*Mature writing style
*Complex sentence structure
*Consistently uses appropriate
professional language
*Smooth and seamless transitions which
lead from one section to the next
*Sources all of appropriate
quality
*Sources cited consistently
and generally appropriately
*Sources all high quality
*Sources cited correctly
*Sources all professional in nature
*Citation style uniformly correct
* Information accurate and
reasonably complete
*Attempts to explain
relevance of the data.
* Information accurate, complete, and
appropriately detailed
* Demonstrates understanding of the
content material. May attempt to
place the material in societal context.
* Demonstrates full understanding of the
content information and its significance
within a cultural/societal context,
including a recognition of source bias
*Information outdated,
inappropriate, inaccurate,
etc.
* Information accurate, but not
always complete.
* Information too simplistic
* Demonstrates only limited
understanding of content material
* Information accurate and
reasonably complete
*Attempts to explain
relevance of the data.
* Information accurate, complete, and
appropriately detailed
* Demonstrates understanding of the
content material. May attempt to
place the material in societal context.
* Demonstrates full understanding of the
content information and its significance
within a cultural/societal context,
including a recognition of source bias
*None given
*Goals stated, but demonstrates
only limited understanding of
connections to the community
information.
* Priorities, goals and
objectives clearly stated.
*Demonstrates an attempt
to develop priorities, goals,
and objectives based on
community information.
*Priorities, goals and objectives
clearly stated.
* Demonstrates understanding of the
community information and how it
relates to the determination of goals
and objectives.
*Priorities, goals and objectives clearly
stated.
* Demonstrates full understanding of the
community information, and how to
prioritize it when forming and deciding
upon goals and objectives.
*Information outdated,
inappropriate, inaccurate,
etc.
* Information accurate, but not
always complete.
* Information too simplistic
* Demonstrates only limited
understanding of content material
* Information accurate and
reasonably complete
*Attempts to explain
relevance of the data.
* Information accurate, complete, and
appropriately detailed
* Demonstrates understanding of the
content material. May attempt to
place the material in societal context.
* Demonstrates full understanding of the
content information and its significance
within a cultural/societal context,
including a recognition of source bias
*Information outdated,
inappropriate, inaccurate,
etc.
* Information accurate, but not
always complete.
* Information too simplistic
* Demonstrates only limited
understanding of content material
* Information accurate and
reasonably complete
*Attempts to explain
relevance of the data.
* Information accurate, complete, and
appropriately detailed
* Demonstrates understanding of the
content material. May attempt to
place the material in societal context.
* Demonstrates full understanding of the
content information and its significance
within a cultural/societal context,
including a recognition of source bias
*No theory discussed
*No application of
information learned
* Theory mentioned
*Information applied in limited
fashion
* Demonstrates reasonable
understanding of the
content material
*Attempts to apply theory
*Discusses application of theory
*Demonstrates understanding of the
significance of the content
*Attempts to address societal context
*Conclusions show great insight into the
problem.
*Theory and its application discussed in
some detail.
*Information outdated,
inappropriate, inaccurate,
etc.
0-35 points
Epidemiological
Assessment
0-35 points
Priorities,
Goals,
Objectives
0-35 points
Behavioral &
Environmental
Assessment
Final Community Analysis Paper
0-35 points
Educational
and Ecological
Assessment
0-35 points
Conclusions
and Theory
Application
0-35 points
Comments:
Points