Students:______________________________ ___________________________________
GO GREEN MANUFACTURING
2014 & 2015 OFFICIAL RATING FORM
MIDDLE SCHOOL
Static Pts (900 points)
CRITERIA
Minimal performance
Adequate performance
Exemplary performance
1-40
41-80
81-100
points
points
points
Evaluators: Using minimal (1-4 points), adequate (5-8 points) or exemplary (9-10 points) performance levels as a guideline, record the
scores earned for the event criteria in the column spaces to the far right. The X1 or X2 notation in the criteria column is a multiplier factor
for determining the points earned. (Example: an “adequate” score of 7 for an X1 criterion = 7 points; an “adequate” score of 7 for an X2
criterion = 14 points.)
Notebook
See Regulation A1
(X1)
Description of product
Instructions for use
(X1)
Advertisement
(X1)
Working drawings
(X1)
Materials list
Tools and machine list
(X1)
Photographic
verification (X1)
Product
(X1)
Product functionality
(X1)
Tolerance of examples
(X1)
Notebook is missing several
components and/or is
unorganized; it is messy and
lacking quality.
Most components are included;
notebook is loosely organized
and/or lacking overall quality.
All components are included;
effort and quality of work are
evident.
Description and instructions for
use are unclear.
Description and instructions for
use are defined and explained,
but lack overall clarity.
Description and instructions for
use are defined and explained
precisely.
Advertisement section is
unorganized and/or is messy and
lacking quality.
Advertisement section is loosely
organized and/or lacks overall
quality.
Advertisement section shows
effort, and quality of work is
evident.
Working drawings are sloppy
and disorganized; they do
not demonstrate labeling and
dimensioning.
Lists are missing several
components, and/or they are
unorganized; they are messy
and lacking quality.
Working drawings are of
sufficient quality, but not all
components are labeled and
dimensioned.
Working drawings are of excellent
quality and are correctly labeled
and dimensioned.
Photographic verification is not
complete, and/or images are
missing.
Photographic verification is
complete, but the quality of
images overall does not work.
Photographic verification is clear
and concise and supports all
aspects of the process.
Product is not built to
detailed standards; it is
poorly constructed and
finished; it lacks creativity
and
Littleimagination.
specific functionality per
Product is built to detailed
standards, but it is not of a
quality to be purchased by a
consumer; and/or the design is
satisfactory
works,
butofit
The productand
meets
some
lacks
creativity
or
uniqueness.
the functionality per the
Product is built to detailed
standards, and it is of a quality that
could be purchased by a
consumer; the design is unique
and
creativity.
The demonstrates
end product exhibits
the original specification is
demonstrated; product does
not
demonstrate
usecleanly
of
Materials
are not the
joined
recycled
or reused
materials.
and are not
consistent
with
working drawings.
Most components are included, All components are included in the
but the lists are loosely organized lists; effort and quality of work are
and/or lack overall quality.
evident.
original specification, but the
use
of recycled
or reusedjoined
Materials
are somewhat
materials
is not
cleanly and
are clear.
fairly consistent
functionality as per the original
specifications, and it clearly
demonstrates
the use
of
Materials are joined
cleanly
recycled
or reused with
materials.
and are consistent
working
with working drawings.
drawings.
Subtotal
SUBTOTAL (900 points)
Presentation (400 points)
CRITERIA
Presentation skills
Use of audio/visual materials
(including prototype)
(X1)
Effectiveness of
presentation
(X1)
Salesmanship
(X1)
Need for the product
(X1)
Minimal performance
Adequate performance
Exemplary performance
1-40
points
Team seems unprepared for the
presentation and is unorganized.
Team exhibits difficulty with the
transition of audio/visual materials.
41-80
points
Team is prepared for the
presentation, but it is somewhat
disorganized in its transitions and
use of audio/visual materials.
81-100
Team members seem to have
little understanding of the subject;
slides and the presentation,
including the prototype, don’t
clearly define and present the
subject.
Team members have a
generalized understanding of the
concepts discussed; members
answer questions fairly well;
slides, presentation and use of the
prototype are, for the most part,
logical and/or clear.
Team members have a thorough
understanding of the concepts
discussed and seem to be truly
knowledgeable of the issues;
team’s slides, presentation,
and use of the prototype are
concise and logical, with a clear
explanation of pertinent issues.
Sales pitch is verbose and
illogical; delivery includes many
“uhs, ums, hmms," etc.; team is
not capable of selling the product
to a “green” industry.
Sales pitch is logical and well
spoken, with few “uhs, ums,
hmms,” etc.; team could possibly
sell product to a “green” industry.
Sales pitch is well spoken, distinct,
and clear; the team’s
salesmanship to a “green” industry
is likely to be successful.
A need for the “green” product is
not demonstrated, and the product
is not realistic/functional.
A need for the product is
adequately demonstrated, and the
product is generally realistic and
functional.
A need for the product is
exceptionally well demonstrated,
and the product is extremely
realistic and functional.
Team’s presentation skills are
excellent and its use of audio/
visual materials is effective,
organized and logical.
SUBTOTAL (400 points)
Total Sheet 1
____________________
Total Sheet 2
____________________
Grand Total out of 1300 Points
____________________
Comments: