Future Orchards Trial Outline Project title: Region: Contact person: Projective Objective: Best fertigation practices for optimum young apple tree growth Western Australia Rachelle Johnstone To determine the best time to apply fertilisers via fertigation during an irrigation event for optimum tree growth by monitoring the movement of nitrate fertilisers in the root zone of young apples trees. Outline/method/ (what we will do): This demonstration will be a continuation of the trial carried out last season. In each selected block, two FullStop® wet front detectors have been installed within the root zone of the tree rows. One at a depth corresponding to the middle of the root zone depth; the second one below the bottom of the root zone. Tensiometers have been installed in the same blocks. An in-line water meter has been installed to record the actual volume of water applied during each monitored event and during the whole irrigation season. As growers apply fertilisers via fertigation, it is hoped to collect soil solution from the FullStops during and shortly after a fertigation event. The level of nitrate in the soil solution will be measured using nitrates test strips Merckoquant®. Records will be made of: The amount of fertiliser applied The timing and duration of the fertiliser injection. The duration of the irrigation. The level of nitrates present in the soil solution at both depths of the root zone. Soil moisture level at the time of the fertigation Total volume of water actually applied Similar recordings will be made for at least three fertigation events on each block. The demonstration set up allows for growers to collect their own soil solution sample and measure nitrates. If nitrates are detected below the bottom of the tree root zone, the grower will be advised and a different strategy of application will be suggested and discussed. Tree growth will be recorded by measuring: tree height monthly; trunk circumference area and tree row volume annually. In addition leaf samples will be collected from each site to assess the nutrition status of trees. Local growers are keen to find out where their fertiliser dollars go and are supportive of this demonstration. 1 Milestones Trial defined Trial setup Records Measurement 1 Field day Records measurement 2 Reporting Presentation growers Planned Date or Completion Date 30/09/2012 31/10/2012 Post harvest 30/06/2014 Post harvest Map & Layout: 2 Future Orchards Trial: Final Report Project title: Region: Contact: Projective Objective: Best fertigation practices for optimum young apple tree growth Western Australia Rachelle Johnstone To determine the best time to apply fertilisers via fertigation during an irrigation event for optimum tree growth by monitoring the movement of nitrate fertilisers in the root zone of young apples trees. Outline/method/ This demonstration was a continuation of the trial carried out last season on two Kanzi® blocks at Newton Orchards of Manjimup. Last season two FullStop® wet front detectors were installed within the root zone of the tree rows: one at a depth corresponding to the middle of the root zone depth and the second below the root zone. The wet front detectors provided a quick visual tool to check the depth of each irrigation event, and a way to collect soil solution for nutrient (nitrate) analysis. (what you did ): Tensiometers were also installed and readings recorded by the orchard manager regularly. An in-line water meter was installed to record the actual volume of water applied during each monitored event and during the whole irrigation season. Soil solution was collected from the FullStops during and shortly after three fertigation events. The level of nitrate in the soil solution was measured using nitrates test strips Merckoquant®. Tree growth was recorded by measuring: tree height; trunk circumference area and tree row volume annually. 3 Results Summary Water use Records of hours of irrigation were taken over the season and the total amount applied was equivalent to 1.4ML/ha or 672 L/tree/season. Using local rainfall and evaporation data this amount is approximately 40% of the theoretical estimated water use (Figure 2). Readily Availiable moisture (Liters / Plant) Change in Rootzone Available Water 20 15 10 Soil moisture (recommended) Soil moisture farm application Field Capacity 5 0 -5 -10 Allowable moisture deficeit -15 -20 -25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Month Figure 1 shows the indicated irrigation pattern has severe stress periods throughout the irrigation season. The graph shows that farm run times are too long and irrigation is not frequent enough to meet daily tree water demand. The trees are regularly pushed into stress between irrigations with the top up irrigation cycle resulting in deep perculation and water lost below the feeding root zone. Cumulative Water Use 12 10 ML / Zone 8 Cumulative water use (recommended) 6 4 Cumulative water use farm 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Month 9 10 11 12 Figure 2 shows the total amount of water applied to the blocks (3.3ha total area) over the season is significantly lower than the recommended amount. 4 Component Application of Water 35 Liters / Plant 30 25 20 Actual applied daily per plant 15 Daily Deep Percolation per plant 10 Daily Plant Requirement 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Month Figure 3 shows that there the irrigation schedule did not meet the daily plant water requirement for extended periods throughout the season. It also shows that periods of extended irrigation run times result in water moving past the root zone. Soil moisture monitoring Tensiometers were installed between 2 drippers, in the tree root zone at depths of 25, 40 and 60 cm. Tensiometers readings were taken regularly by the orchard manager. Two FullStop™ wet front detectors (www.fullstop.com.au ) were installed at depths of 30 and 50 cm. The orchard manager checked the FullStops after each irrigation event. Block 23 16 Tension (kPa) 14 12 10 25cm 8 40cm 6 60cm 4 2 0 25-Oct-13 25-Nov-13 25-Dec-13 25-Jan-14 25-Feb-14 Figure 4 shows tensiometer readings for block 23 over the season 5 25-Mar-14 Block 24 16 Tension (kPa) 14 12 10 25cm 8 40cm 6 60cm 4 2 0 25-Oct-13 25-Nov-13 25-Dec-13 25-Jan-14 25-Feb-14 25-Mar-14 Figure 5 shows tensiometer readings for block 24 over the season Block 23 Irrigation run time (hours) 16 14 12 <30cm 30cm 50cm 10 8 6 4 2 0 25-Oct-13 25-Nov-13 25-Dec-13 25-Jan-14 25-Feb-14 25-Mar-14 Figure 6 shows the irrigation events recorded over the season for block 23. The events in blue indicate that water did not move past 30cm for that event. The red events moved past 30cm and the green events moved past 50 cm as indicated by the FullStop wetting front detector. Block 24 Irrigation run time (hours) 16 14 <30cm 30cm 50cm 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 25-Oct-13 25-Nov-13 25-Dec-13 25-Jan-14 6 25-Feb-14 25-Mar-14 Figure 7 shows the irrigation events recorded over the season for block 24. The events in blue indicate that water did not move past 30cm for that event. The red events moved past 30cm and the green events moved past 50 cm as indicated by the FullStop wetting front detector. Monitoring of nitrate fertilisers Soil solution samples were collected from the SSET and full stops during three fertigation events on 29 January, 6 and 13 February 2014. During the fertigation event, the presence of nitrates in the irrigation water was detected using Merckoquant® test strips 0-500 mg/l NO3. Nitrates were detected in the solution from the FullStop at 50cm after each event suggesting some leaching below the root zone. There is a lack of a clear pattern of nitrate migration in the soil profile hours after the fertiliser application in the three events. Production In 2014 40 bins were picked from block 23 and 48 bins from block 24 (pack out values not available at time of writing this report). This equates to around 35 tonnes for the two blocks which is approximately 10.6 tonnes per hectare. Tree growth Figure 8 shows tree growth on block 24 from September 2012 to March 2014. 7 Table 1 shows tree growth measurements for block 24 from 2012 – 2014. Kanzi®-block 24 Tree height (m) Tree Row Volume (m3/ha) Average tree girth (mm) Trunk Circumference Area (cm2/tree) % full canopy Average branches/tree Sept 2012 2 1000 84 5.6 25 3 Jan 2013 2.2 >15 Sept 2013 2.25 2750 105 8.8 40 10 Apr 2014 2.5 4250 50 - Sept 2013 2.25 2375 95 7.19 30 7 Apr 2014 2.5 3875 50 Table 2 shows tree growth measurements for block 23 from 2012 – 2014. (Kanzi®-block 23) Tree height (m) Tree Row Volume (m3/ha) Average tree girth (mm) Trunk Circumference Area (cm2/tree) % full canopy Average branches/tree Sept 2012 2 1125 80 5 15 3 Jan 2013 2.4 >15 Conclusions/Implication Assessing the movement of nitrate fertilisers in the tree root zone requires more sites and/or a greater numbers of events monitored to get a better picture of what is really going on. The current irrigation practice is not meeting the requirements of the trees. As this is a young block it may have a negative impact on future production and performance. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Newton Orchards of Manjimup for allowing us to carry out the trial on their Starkies road property and orchard manager Ben Wilson for help with collecting data over the season. 8