Stability of Human telomeric G-Quadruplex DNA with Actinomycin-D Rushi Ghizal Physics Department Integral University,Kursi Road, Lucknow, 226066.U.P,India. rushi_ghizal@yahoo.co.in Gazala Roohi Fatima Seema Srivastava Physics Department Integral University,Kursi Road, Lucknow, 226066.U.P,India. gazala03@gmail.com Physics Department Integral University, Kursi Road, Lucknow, 226066. U.P,India. seemasr1@rediffmail.com ABSTRACT The theory of cooperative transitions has been applied to explain the stability and melting behavior of Telomeric G-Quadruplex DNA. The transition profiles and heat capacity curves are best explained in terms of two variable parameters, namely nucleation and propagation parameters. Greater stability is achieved in presence of K+ ions, compared with Na+ ion. It is ascribed to dipole and dipole-induced transitions. Keywords G-Quadruplex, transition profiles, heat capacity. Fig 1. Chemical structure of Actinomycin D 1. INTRODUCTION In recent years the study of small molecules that selectively target and stabilize the Gquadruplex structures have emerged as an area of tropical interest. This DNA structure motif (G-quadruplex) has emerged as a novel and exciting target for the discovery and design of new class of anticancer drugs [1-3]. Recently Jason S.H, et al. [4] have reported thermodynamic and structural characterization of human telomeric G-quadruplex.In their work an interaction between actinomycin D (Fig. 1) and human telomeric sequence d[AGGG(TTAGGG)3] have been presented. The thermal melting profiles were obtained for both free and bound Na+ and K+ forms of the Gquadruplex DNA structure using differential scanning calorimetry. Their study shows that in presence of K+ ions, guanine forms a more stable tetramolecular complex, compared with Na+ ions. In the present study, we have used the theory of co-operativity for a finite system to generate the transition profiles and λ-point anomaly in heat capacity at transition point. The heat capacity measurements of Jason S.H, et al. [4], have provided the input information. The alteration in nucleation parameter, which is inverse measure of binding strength, reflects the effect of actinomycin D binding. 2. THEORY The stability of G-Quadruplex is directly related to the strength and number of hydrogen bonds. They are also responsible for cooperativity enhancement. Thus, the melting of such molecules, which involve both positional and orientational disordering, can be treated as two-phase problem. Thus we can modify Zimm and Bragg theory [5]. In brief, the above theory consist of writing an Ising matrix for two phase system, the bonded state and unbounded state. As discussed earlier [5-10], the Ising matrix π can be written as- 1 ππ2 ππ 1 2 ππ 1 2 ππ ππ ππ π = ππ ππ2 ππ2 1 1 2 1 2 πβ [π π β π 1 2 0 ππ2 πβ2 0 1 2 2 [ πβ ] 1 (1) 1 2 πβ πβ ] Where, ππ , πβ and ππ are corresponding base pair partition function contributions in the three states (i.e ordered, disordered and boundary or nucleation). G-G and T-T have been assumed to have the same statistical weight because according to crystallographic studies reported recently [6], both thymine and guanine are hydrogen-bonded in a tetrad complex in the same manner. The hydrogen bond lengths are approximately the same. The eigen values for M are given by: 1 1 (3) ππ2 1 0 1 1 π= ππ ππ 1 1 2 πβ The partition function for a π -segment chain is given by: π = π ππ−1 π (4) The matrix π which diagonalizes M consists of the column vectors given by: ππ = ππ (5) Where π1 π = [ π2 ] π3 By substituting the value of π from Eq. 1 in Eq. 5, we get π1 = 2 [(ππ + πβ ) + {(ππ − πβ )2 + 4ππ ππ }2 ] 1 1 π2 = [(ππ + πβ ) − {(ππ − πβ )2 + 4ππ ππ }2 ] 2 π3 = 0 1 1 (π1 −ππ ) (π2 −ππ ) 1 1 Since we are dealing with finite system, hence the effect of initial and final states becomes important. The contribution of the first segment to the partition function is given by a row vector π. It is assumed that the initial state is disordered state. 1 2 π = [(ππ , 0, 0)] (2) Similarly, the column π gives the state of last segment, 1 1 (ππ2 ππ2 ) (ππ2 ππ2 ) 1 1 (πβ2 ππ2 ) 1 1 (πβ2 ππ2 ) [(π1 −πβ ) (π2 −πβ ) π= 1 1 1 −ππ2 ππ2 (6) 1 1 −πβ2 ππ2 ] Similarly, we get π −1 from the matrix equation: ππ = ππ (7) Where π = [π1 π2 π3 ] Again, by substituting the values of π from Eq. 1 in Eq. 7, we get: πΆ1 πΆ1 π −1 = πΆ 2 πΆ2 1 1 1 1 ππ2 ππ2 ππ ππ2 πβ2 πΆ1 π 1 (π1 −πβ ) 1 1 ππ ππ2 πβ2 π1 1 1 ππ2 ππ2 2 (π2 −πβ ) 1 1 ππ ππ2 πβ2 1 1 [πΆ3 πΆ3 (8) πΆ2 π π2 ππ2 ππ2 πΆ3 π ] 3 (π3 −πβ ) π3 The normalizing constants are: πΆ1 = (π1 −πβ ) (π1 −π2 ) , πΆ2 = (π2 −πβ ) (π2 −π1 , πΆ3 = 0 ) (9) If we let π¬ = π −1 ππ be he diagonalized form of π, the partition function can be written as: π = πππ¬π−1 π −1 (10) The extension of this formalism is straight forward. The specific heat is related to molar enthalpy and entropy changes in the transition from state I to state II. From well-known thermodynamic relations, free energy and internal energy are πΉ = −πΎππππ and π = −π 2 (πΏ/πΏπ)(πΉ/π) respectively. Differentiating internal energy with respect to temperature we get the specific heat: πΆπ£ = 1 πΏπππ π πΏππππ π (11) ] ππ = 2 + (1−π)(2π΄−1) 2π + (1+π){(2π΄−1)π −1 +π } 2π 2 π ) (14) 1 − ( 3 ) [{(2π΄ − 1)π − 1 2π π + π }2(π + 1)] (12) Where π= πΏπ + {(2π΄ − 1)π − 1 + π }}] Solving the above equation, we get 1 2 π πΏπ π πΏππ 1 πΏπ΄ = ( 2 ) [2π(1 − π ) − π(2π΄ − 1) πΏπ 2π πΏπ πΏπ − (1 − π )(2π΄ − 1) ] πΏπ 1 + ( 3 ) [π {(π 2π π πΏπ πΏπ΄ + 1) {(2π΄ − 1) + 2π + 1} πΏπ πΏπ The fraction of the segments in the disordered form is given by ππ = [ ] [ πΏπ βπ» = ππ (π π ) ( Where βπ» is the molar change in enthalpy about the transition point, ππ is the transition temperature, and On substituting the values from Eqs. 1, 2, 3, 6, 8 and 9 in Eq. 10, the partition function becomes: π = πΆ1 π1π + πΆ2 ππ 2 πΏπ With (π1 −π2 ) ππ ,π = πβ ππ ππ , π= − π΄ = [(ππ − πβ )2 + 4ππ ππ ] ππ , πΏπ΄ πΏπ 1 2 Here π is propagation parameter, which for simplicity is assumed to be 1. In fact, in most of the systems, it is found to be close to unity. If π΄π and π΄β are the absorbance in disordered and ordered states, respectively, the total absorption can be written as: π΄ = ππ π΄π + (1 − ππ )π΄β (13) πΏπ πΏπ = { = (π −π)π π 2 ππ π (π −1) π π } × (π3 ) × [−2 + π , π= (π −2π−1) (π −π) ] ππ ππ Where π is nucleation parameter and is a measure of the energy expanded/released in the formation (uncoiling) of first turn of the ordered/disordered state. It is related to the uninterrupted sequence lengths [5]. The volume heat capacity πΆπ£ has been converted into constant pressure heat capacity πΆπ by using the Nernest-Lindermann approximation [11-12]. πΆπ2 π πΆπ − πΆπ£ = 3π π΄0 (πΆ π£ ππ ) (15) Where π΄0 is a constant often of a universal value [3.9 x 10-3 (K mol/J)] and ππ is the melting temperature. 3. RESULTS 3.1. Transition Profiles When Actinomycin D binds to GQuadruplex DNA, the structure of DNA still remains highly co-operative and hence two state theory of order/disorder transitions is applicable. The Zimm-Bragg theory is amended so as to consider ordered and disordered states (bounded/unbounded), as the two states coexist at the transition point. The transition is characterized mainly by the nucleation parameter and overall change of entropy/enthalpy, which are also the main thermodynamic force driving the transitions. The change in enthalpy obtained from differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) measurements takes all this into account. This is evident from the enthalpy changes and the changes in other transition parameter, such as nucleation parameter (π) and melting point (Table 1 and Table 2). The result obtained from the theoretical study suggested that the binding of Actinomycin D increases the melting temperature of G-Quadruplex DNA (for both K+ and Na+ forms). At saturation the melting point of K+ G-Quadruplex DNA was increased with 9.375 K in comparison with free G-Quadruplex. Similarly, the melting point of Na+ GQuadruplex was increased with 18.25 K The sharpness of the transition can be looked at in terms of half width and sensitivity parameter defined as (βπ»/π). The deviations in half-width and sensitive parameters scientifically revealed that the transition is sharp in case of unbounded state and goes blunt with Actinomycin D saturation. In case of π-transition, the same trend in the sharpness of transition is seen between the Actinomycin D boned as well as unbounded curves. As, anticipated, the sharpness is better in unbound state as compared to bound state. A range of parameters, which give transition profiles in best agreement with the experimental measurements for binding of Actinomycin D to G-Quadruplex DNA (K+ and Na+ forms) are given in Table 1 and Table 2. Table 1. Transition Parameters for Actinomycin D binding to G-Quadruplex (K+ form). Parameters Unbonded GQuadruplex DNA 341.75 ππ (K) 4 1.6X10 βπ»(Kcal/Mbp) 0.0046 π 56 π Half Width 12 (Exp) Half Width 12 (Theo) Sensitivity 3.478X106 parameter (βπ»/π) G-Quadruplex DNA bonded with Actinomycin D 351.125 1.1X104 0.00061 56 7.5 7.5 1.083X107 Table 2. Transition Parameters for Actinomycin D binding to G-Quadruplex (Na+ form). Parameters ππ (K) βπ»(Kcal/Mbp) π π Half Width (Exp) Half Width (Theo) Sensitivity parameter (βπ»/π) Unbonded GQuadruplex DNA 333 2.4X104 0.015 56 8 G-Quadruplex DNA bonded with Actinomycin D 351.25 1.5X104 0.00099 56 7.5 8 7.5 1.6X106 1.515X107 Experimental Cp 1 Absorbance Specific Heat (Kcal/mol K) 1 0.75 Theoretical Cp Predicted Value 0.5 0 290 0.5 320 350 Temperature (K) 0.25 0 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 Temperature (K) Fig. 2 Heat Capacity and transition profile of free K+ form of the G-quadruplex DNA structure. 370 Experimental Cp Theoretical Cp 1 1 Predicted Value Absorbance Specific Heat ( (Kcal/mol K) 3.2. Heat Capacity Heat capacity, second derivative of the free energy, has been calculated by using Eq. 14 and 15, which is used to characterize conformational and dynamical states of a macromolecular system. These heat capacities with π-point anomaly along with their transition profiles for unbounded G-Quadruplex DNA (K+ form) is shown in Fig. 2 and for Actinomycin D bonded to G-Quadruplex DNA (K+ form) is shown in Fig. 3. The results revealed that the theoretically obtained heat capacity profiles agreed with the experimentally reported one and could be brought almost into concurrence with the use of scaling factors. Minor insignificant deviations at the tail end is primarily due to the presence of various disordered states and presence of short helical segments found in random coil states. The predicted values of absorbance for both unbounded and bonded state are also given in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3. 0.75 0.5 0 0.5 290 320 350 Temperature (K) 0.25 0 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 Temperature (K) Fig. 3 Heat Capacity and transition profile of K + form of the G-quadruplex DNA structure bonded with Actinomycin D Similarly the heat capacities and their transition profiles for unbounded G-Quadruplex DNA (Na+ form) is shown in Fig. 4 and for the Actinomycin D bonded to G-Quadruplex DNA (Na+ form) is shown in Fig.5. Again one observes that the theoretically obtained heat capacity profiles agreed with the experimentally reported ones. The sharpness of the transition can be characterized by half width of the heat capacity curves that are in good agreement in both experimental and theoretical graphs. Again the predicted absorbance is shown in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 for unbounded and bonded states. It must also be noted that the heat capacities and the transition profiles of G-Quadruplex (K+ form and Na+ form) revealed that greater stabilization is achieved in presence of K+ ions, compared to Na+ ions. Experimental Cp Absorbance Specific Heat (Kcal/mol K) Predicted Value 1 1 Theoretical Cp 0.5 0 0.75 290 320 350 Temperature(K) 0.5 0.25 0 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 Temperature (K) Fig. 4 Heat Capacity and transition profile of free Na+ form of the G-quadruplex DNA structure. Experimental Cp Theoretical Cp REFERENCES 1 Predicted Value Specific Heat (Kcal/mol K) Absorbance 1 0.5 0.75 0 290 0.5 320 350 Temperature (K) 0.25 0 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 Temperature (K) Fig. 5 Heat Capacity and transition profile of Na+ form of the G-quadruplex DNA structure bonded with Actinomycin D 4. CONCLUSION The present study concluded that the DNA molecule is an extremely co-operative structure and when Actinomycin D binds to it, the cooperativity is not so much disturbed. Therefore the amended Zimm Bragg theory (phase transitions theory) can be effectively applied to it. It generates the experimental transition profiles and π-point heat capacity anomaly successfully. These results will allow us to assess the thermodynamic profile of binding process. Our theoretical data also demonstrates that the binding of Actinomycin D to GQuadruplex DNA is an endothermic process and that the binding increases the melting temperature of the quadruplex. Therefore the theoretical analysis presented in this study can be implicated to understand bimolecular interactions and may also be applied in biomedical industries for drug design and development. 1. Han, H., and Hurley, L. H. 2000. Gquadruplex DNA: a potential target for anti-cancer drug design. Trends Pharmacol Sci 21, 136-142. 2. Hurley, L. H. 2001. Secondary DNA structures as molecular targets for cancer therapeutics. Biochem Soc T 29, 692696. 3. Sun, D., Thompson, B., Cathers, B. E., Salazar, M., Kerwin, S. M., Trent, J. O., Jenkins, T. C., Neidle, S., and Hurley, L. H. 1997. Inhibition of human telomerase by a G-quadruplex-interactive compound. J Med Chem 40, 2113-2116. 4. Jason, S. H., Sonja, C. B., and David, E. G. 2009. Interactions of Actinomycin D with Human Telomeric G- Quadruplex DNA. Biochemistry-US, 48(21), 44404447. 5. Zimm, B. H., and Bragg, J. K. 1959. Theory of phase transition between helix and random coil in polypeptide chains. J Chem Phys. 31, 532-535. 6. Srivastava, S., Gupta, V. D., Tandon, P., Singh, S., and Katti, S. B. 1999. Drug binding and order–order and orderdisorder transitions in DNA triple helixes. J Macromol Sci Phys. 38, 349366. 7. Srivastava, S., Srivastava, S., Singh, S., and Gupta, V. D. 2001. Stability and transitions in a DNA tetraplex: a model of telomers. J. Macromol. Sci. Phy. 40(1), 1-14. 8. Srivastava, S., Khan, I. A., Srivastava, S., and Gupta, V. D. 2004. A theoretical study of stability of DNA binding with cis/trans platin. Indian J. Biochem. Biophys. 41, 305-310. 9. Polkar, N., Pilch, D. S., Lippard, S. J., Redding, E. A., Dunham, S. U., and Breslauer, K. J. 1996. Influence of cisplatin intrastrand crosslinking on conformatiom, thermal stability and energetic of a 20-mer DNA duplex. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA. 93, 76067611. 10. Roles, K. A., and Wunderlich, B. 1991. Heat capacities of solid poly(amino acids). I. polyglycine, poly(L-alanine) and poly(L-valine). Biopolymers. 31, 477-487. 11. Pan, R., Verma, M. N., and Wunderlich, B. 1989. J. Therm. Ann. 35, 955-961. 12. Roles, K. A., Xenopoulos, A., and Wunderlich, B. 1993. Biopolymers. 33, 753-755.