Study Programme Report
Buskerud and Vestfold University College
Study Programme Report
Yearly report on active study programmes at HBV
The Purpose
The purpose of the programme report is to safeguard the annual quality assessment of the programme.
Evaluation and reflection are central to the report.
Programme reports are a part of the basis for the Faculty's annual quality report, and shall give the Dean a
basis to assess the quality of the study programmes and the need for any changes.
Programme reports should be filed in HBV’s official archive. The filing makes it possible for new
programme coordinators to familiarise themselves with the development of the programme through previous
study reports.
--- ---- --- ---- --Responsible for the programme report: Programme Coordinator
Deadline for programme report: 15th October for report for the previous academic year
The Programme reports are to be filed in Public 360. The Head of Department is set as receiver. Head of Department
forwards all programme reports to the Dean.
Procedure regarding the programme reports, SP -25, is described in HBV’s website.
--- ---- --- ---- ---
1 Introduction
Facts about the study programme
Programme code: ____________________
Programme name: __________________________
Student cohorts affected by the report: _________________________
Programme report is written for which academic year: ______________________________
Faculty: __________________________
Collaborating Faculty (if applicable): _______________________
Date: ____ Programme Coordinator for the programme: ____________________
Version 1.0. Valid from June 2015
Side 1 av 3
Study Programme Report - Buskerud and Vestfold University College
2 Follow-up on Previous Reports
2.1. Status for following up regarding measures adopted after the previous programme report for this
programme
Write here
3. Student Evaluations of the Programme
3.1. Evaluations conducted during the programme - summary and follow-up of the results
Summary of the evaluations carried out during the programme (“Studiebarometeret” – Study Survey), and its individual
course evaluations conducted in the programme’s courses, during the academic year (this report concerns). Which
measures have been taken to follow-up the results?
Write here
3.2. Evaluation of supervised professional training (if applicable) - summary and follow-up of the
results.
Summary of the evaluation of the supervised professional training in the programme (Studiebarometeret – Study
Survey) and of the professional training periods in its individual courses. Which measures have been taken to follow-up
the results?
Write here
3.3. Final Evaluation - summary
Summary of the final evaluations of the programme and its courses.
Write here
4.
Quality in Education - Governing Parameters
4.1. The total score given by the students for the programme in the Study Survey “studiebarometeret”
Score result found lower than 4.1 in the Study Survey must always be commented upon
Results:
4.2. Completed credits according to the students’ individual education plan
Results:
4.3. ECTS credits production related to a full-time equivalent
ECTS credits production result lower than 46 % must be commented upon
Results:
4.4. Student Exchange (inbound and outbound)
Results:
Version: 1.0. Valid from June 2015
Side 2 av 3
Study Programme Report - Buskerud and Vestfold University College
4.5. Number of graduates
Results:
4.6. The number of qualified first priority applicants
Results:
5. Programme Coordinator’s assessment of the Education Quality of the
Programme:
5.1.
Quality assurance and quality development regarding the students' learning outcomes
Programme coordinator’s assessment regarding quality assurance and quality development of the students' learning
outcomes in the programme.
Programme coordinator’s assessment also relates to regarding the total learning outcome for the programme being
achieved with the programme’s courses and their course descriptions, and whether the learning outcomes described in
the programme are both updated and relevant to the academic level, the working life’s expectations and the student’s
expectations. What is done to ensure this?
Write here
5.2. Report on activities in the programme council, the programme boards or similar
A brief description of the meetings and the number of meetings held, issues that have been discussed and how one
perceives the function of meetings.
Write here
5.3. Assessment of the overall quality of the study programme
Programme Coordinator’s assessment of the overall quality of the programme based on his/her own experience, the
points discussed above, earlier programme reports and conversations with the persons responsible of the individual
courses.
Write here
6. Improvement of the Quality of the Programme - Proposals for Action
Discuss the need for academic, pedagogical and practical changes in the programme, and, if applicable, propose
measures for quality improvement of the programme.
Write here
--- ---- --- ---- --Version: 1.0. Valid from June 2015
Side 3 av 3