Third Party Vendor Management The partnership with a Third Party Vendor (also called Travel Company, Planning Agency, etc.) is an accepted, and common, practice in the meetings and events industry. The ability to capitalize on external expertise can result in cost savings and increased efficiencies. In order to ensure that the partnership between MetLife and the Third Party vendor is favorable to the enterprise, outlined below are some guiding principles which should be immediately implemented. Third Party Guidelines for Sourcing & Contracting Programs One of the most important factors to consider when working with a Third Party is the level of transparency they provide, or open communication. Transparency related to pricing or and program inclusions is of the highest importance. Third Parties should always specifically: Identify themselves as working on behalf of MetLife and not operating independently. All communications with potential vendors – transportation companies, airlines, hotels, DMCs, etc. – should be listed as “XYZ Travel on behalf of MetLife”. This makes it easier for the end vendors to provide reporting to MetLife when requested and to recognize MetLife’s Enterprise spend. Source the programs through MetLife’s preferred hotel global sales contacts for major hotel chain properties. This will encourage recognition of MetLife business at an Enterprise level and enable MetLife to benefit from any applicable hotel concessions (concession examples to consider when negotiating have been provided in this same package of information). This means that the MetLife in-country contacts for Hilton, Hyatt, InterContinental, Marriott or Starwood, should receive the requests for proposals directly from the Third Party. For Fairmont, Four Seasons, Shangri-La or any other major hotel chain properties, US based global sales contacts should be contacted with the RFPs (see provided list for hotel contact information). Third parties should not use their own hotel contacts unless it is an independently managed hotel that is not affiliated with any chain where MetLife has no pre-existing relationship. Negotiate favorable terms and establish a standard of service with local Destination Management Companies (DMCs) on MetLife’s behalf. Third Party companies also traditionally source local support for programs from a DMC. Examples of standards of service that should be expected and concessions that should be requested from DMCs is attached. Page 1 of 3 Provide the MetLife planning team with a copy of the actual hotel and DMC contracts, and estimated concessions. It is critical to the planning process that the MetLife planning team, Third Party, hotel and DMC are all clear on the inclusions of the contract and appropriate terms and conditions. The hotel and DMC contracts should be signed by MetLife, not the Third Party. This allows MetLife to “own” the program and be better positioned as the true client and decision maker in the process. This will result in better service and value for MetLife. It also protects MetLife should a change in ownership or problems with the financial status of the third party occur. Provide the MetLife planning team with a separate contract for the Third Party’s consultative services. This contract should be separate from the hotel and DMC contracts. The MetLife planning team should determine a negotiation strategy for what type of fee structure that they want to pursue with the third party. Examples of negotiation strategies that can be used are: - Cost plus – The fee for the Third Party is based on an agreed upon percentage of program spend. The concern related to this scenario is that the Third Party may want to upsell and not negotiate enough on MetLife’s behalf so that the final program cost, and therefore their fee increases. In this case, it can be difficult to budget for the Third Party fees since it is variable. For example, the program estimated total spend at the time of proposal was $1,000 and the Third Party fee is 10%, or was estimated $100. At the time of program invoice, the program spend was $1,200 so the Third Party fee is $120. - Flat fee – The fee for the Third Party is a fee that is agreed upon at the time the business is awarded to the Third Party. It does not vary based on the program final pricing or costs. This is considered a preferable scenario. - Multi-year or Multi-program – This is a strategy that is considered beneficial for both MetLife and the Third Party. It assumes that based on volume business from MetLife, either for many programs in one year or many programs over a number of years, that the Third Party would provide a list of concessions relative to the volume of business. For example, if XYZ Third Party gets 2 programs in one year, that they would offer one set of concessions but if they get awarded 3 programs, they will offer an increased list of concessions. Once the above is agreed upon, it is important to also take these two additional steps: - As per your country’s specific guidelines, legal review of all contracts should be conducted to limit MetLife’s exposure and risk. - After legal review and prior to signature, please provide English copies of all Third Party contracts/associated contracts, for major incentive or business meetings for events having the value of $200,000 USD and over to Corporate Conference & Event Management for review and record keeping. Page 2 of 3 Third Party Vendor / MetLife Planning Team Operations Once contracting a third party Vendor is complete, the process moves into an operations phase. Here are some key elements to keep in mind when moving into this phase of planning. Specific roles and responsibilities of MetLife Planning Team versus the Third Party Vendor should be agreed to in writing Planning schedule should be identified and timeline for deliverables established Complete proposals / costing prepared and presented by the Third Party Site visits conducted and key introductions of local vendors made Final arrangements/services agreed upon and updated final program specifications Event review of all specifications including staffing /roles On-site operation of program Third Party Post-Program Responsibilities Provide the MetLife planning team with a copy of the actual hotel/DMC invoices, and include an outline of the actual value of negotiated concessions. Transparency related to pricing and costs is an important part of the Third Party relationship. Complete invoices directly from the hotel/DMC should be provided to MetLife. The invoices should include an outline of the monetary value of negotiated concessions. This information is valuable and should be reported in our collective global effort to showcase cost savings and reduce expenses. A formal post-conference meeting should be held to review the Third Party, and recommended vendor, performance. Adjustments for improving operations, service and attendee experience should be documented. Page 3 of 3