2011 MS-1 SARC Manual Jessica Morton Alex Soriano Caroline Rieser Class of 2014 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 General Study Tips .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Lecture Attendance ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Textbooks ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 General Advice .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 FUNDAMENTALS OF BASIC SCIENCE BLOCK .................................................................................................. 6 Medical Anatomy ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Fuel Metabolism.....................................................................................................................................................................................................11 Human Genetics .....................................................................................................................................................................................................14 Cellular and Pathologic Basis of Disease .....................................................................................................................................................17 Immunology in Health and Disease ...............................................................................................................................................................21 Microbiology............................................................................................................................................................................................................24 ORGAN SYSTEM AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY BLOCK ...................................................................................... 27 Neuroscience ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................27 Introduction to Psychiatry ................................................................................................................................................................................31 INTRODUCTION TO PATENT CARE BLOCK ................................................................................................... 34 Medical Interviewing ...........................................................................................................................................................................................34 Introduction to Physical Examination ..........................................................................................................................................................36 Advanced Physical Examination .....................................................................................................................................................................39 Clinical Experiences .............................................................................................................................................................................................41 PATIENT PHYSICIAN AND SOCIETY BLOCK .................................................................................................. 42 Introduction to Being a Physician ..................................................................................................................................................................42 Ethics, Law, and Professionalism....................................................................................................................................................................43 Behavioral Medicine.............................................................................................................................................................................................45 SCIENTIFIC REASONING IN MEDICINE BLOCK .............................................................................................. 48 Medical Decision Making....................................................................................................................................................................................48 Methods & Logic in Medicine 1........................................................................................................................................................................50 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................................. 52 1 INTRODUCTION Overview Congratulations and welcome to the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine! All of your hard work has finally paid off, so enjoy your matriculation to medical school. Studying in medical school will be drastically different from what you are used to, but there are multiple resources to help ensure that the transition is as smooth and successful as possible. One of them is this guide, the SARC Manual. We, the Student Academic Resource Consortium, have compiled feedback from the class of 2014 to provide you with an insight into the first-year experience. Our goal is to provide you with an idea of the first-year curriculum and to give you advice on what books to buy, the most important lectures to go to, and how to study. Your first year will be the school’s seventh iteration of the curriculum since it was most recently overhauled. Through student and faculty feedback, many adjustments have been made to improve the curriculum. Much remains the same from last year, with some minor changes that we have addressed. The manual is organized by block and by course. Contained herein are the opinions of over 70 members of the 2014 class. While you may be overwhelmed with information now, you can skim the manual at the beginning of the year to get a sense for what is in store. As you prepare for each course, you can revisit each section for more detail. Good luck and have a great year! General Study Tips A good recommendation is to start with your current study habits. However, be aware that the volume of material is greater and coming at a faster pace than in an undergraduate curriculum. Those who have been out of school for a few years or that are coming from a non‐science background may want to pay more attention to developing new study habits. Below are outlined the most common strategies employed by PittMed students. It’s best to experiment and find out what methods seem to work for you. Highlighting and rereading the syllabus. At the start of each course, you will receive a syllabus containing all of the lecture notes. Since tests are for the most part built around these syllabi, this is the most popular and highest-yield strategy. Pre-reading the syllabus. Having seen the material once already makes a big difference when you are listening to the lecture. You get more out of the lecture, do not get lost as easily, and can pay more attention to the details than just the big picture. Condensing syllabus notes. Condensing the material into your own words forces you to digest and understand the material. Focusing on the learning objectives. The syllabi will have learning objectives for each lecture. The learning objectives tell you what the instructors expect you to understand. By answering the objectives, you can focus your studies on the important concepts that are tested and not waste your time on extraneous details. Highlighting and rereading the Powerpoint slides. For some courses, the slides are more informative than the syllabus. Using flashcards. This is a popular and effective strategy for anatomy and microbiology. Netter’s Anatomy Flash Cards and Lippincott’s Microcards are popular published sets. It is far more effective to make your 2 own, though, if you have the time. You can only include the information you need, and making the card is part of the memorization process. Making study groups. Being able to teach a concept means that you know it really well, and you can use your classmates to shore up the parts where you are weak. Good study groups provide accountability, not chat time. Doing practice questions. Practice questions are available in the syllabus or online for most classes, and are usually similar to exam questions. Re-listening to podcasts. Some students are aural learners and benefit from listening to lectures again at faster speeds. You will figure out the right combination for yourself. Generally students drift into one of the following categories: Getting the Most For their Money: Attends lecture religiously, pre-reads, seeks out instructors for help Married to the Syllabus: pre-reads, post-reads, post-post-reads, highlights with a codified system Speedy Gonzalez: Chipmunks sound slow to him after he spends all day listening to Dr. Schumann at 2x on his computer. Social Butterfly: Not found studying alone. Needs communal suffering for motivation. Just Confused: Has yet to nail down what works. Likely to change gears between or within courses. Probably should talk to Rich Levitt. Lecture Attendance Attending lecture is largely an individual preference. Some people learn best by reading on their own and searching for answers, while others need a dynamic environment that can yield immediate responses to questions. Some favored lecture as a chance to actually hear the information, and thus reinforce what they had previously read. Many students have commented that attending lectures is only valuable if you take the time to pre-read so you are not overwhelmed by the lecturer’s pace. All lectures are recorded with the PowerPoint synced to audio and subsequently posted online. Podcasts of the lectures are also available, but with audio only. Most people found this to be a great resource to review lectures or to view information missed due to illness or travels. Some students skip lecture completely, using the recordings alone. They cite the efficiency of being able to speed up/slow down/pause the lecture. Yet, overall, students agreed that recordings should not be used as a complete substitute for attendance. Some lectures are not recorded, either by accident or design, often causing podcast-learners to miss important information. Rich Levitt, who helps us study for the boards, notes that many second-years with the lowest practice board scores happened to be regular lecture-skippers. Also, one study found an inverse correlation between medical school performance and frequency of accessing online video lectures.1 Please remember that lecturers have many other obligations (mainly clinical and research responsibilities). If they notice that attendance is minimal they will be less inclined to put together a compelling presentation. We urge you to consider these factors when deciding whether or not to attend class. Note for Mac users: Unless the school has updated the program it uses to stream recorded lectures, by using the link provided on Navigator (Podcast RSS feed) you will only be able to hear the audio (no synced slides) and only at 1x speed. However, you can listen at variable speeds by using QuickTime instead of iTunes. Pressing alt while clicking play will increase speed in increments of .1 (e.g., click give times to achieve a speed of 1.5). 1 McNulty JA et al., An analysis of lecture video utilization in undergraduate medical education: associations with performance in the courses. BMC Med Educ 2009, 9: 6 3 Textbooks Perhaps the greatest asset of this manual is to give some guidance on what books to buy and what you might not want to waste your time on. Some books were universally accepted as essential (i.e. Netters) and others tended to vary upon personal preference. Books purchased at the health bookstore are nonreturnable. Consult this guide or check out a copy of the book in the Book Room (M219, immediately on the right after the double doors on your way to free coffee in the Alumni Office). Other cheap options for acquiring texts include: half.com, SOMADS email list, and a student organized book sale held intermittently throughout the year. Below is a list of books that had a consensus verdict from the class of 2014. “Buy! Buy! Buy!”: Netter’s Atlas of Human Anatomy Abbas’s Basic Immunology Haines’s Neuroanatomy Rao’s Rational Medical Decision Making “Don’t Waste your Money!”: Klippel’s Primer on the Rheumatic Diseases Albert’s Molecular Biology of the Cell You will have to decide whether you want to buy the others. Use the data from the polls in this manual (grouped by course) and take a look at your friend’s copy before you put down your money. General Advice The first year will be great. We promise. However, that doesn’t mean there won’t be challenges and obstacles along the way. Real life doesn’t stop just because you are busy for an anatomy test. Thankfully, PittMed provides numerous resources to help you weather the added stress of being a medical student. Many people stumble at some point during the year, so don’t be afraid to seek out help. The worst thing to do in this situation is to do nothing. Rich Levitt (rich@medschool.pitt.edu) is a great contact point. He can review your study techniques, offer advice, and set you up with tutors, all for free! Also, Rich Levitt can provide access to counseling resources for those who want more than just academic advice. Finally, remember you are not a studying robot. The school and the city have many options for being involved beyond medical school. A sane and healthy student is a wellperforming student. Below you will find advice from the current second year class. Please keep in mind that this advice comes from a variety or individuals and may or may not prove best for you. As with any advice, take what works for you and don’t get stressed out by the rest. Advice from 2014: Just relax. You're a smart person. You'll do just fine. Don't get behind on lectures. It's a lot easier to go home and do each day's lectures than be constantly a week behind. Don't study on Friday evenings. Make sure to take time for relaxation. You can't study all hours of the day! 4 Don't fall behind. It's easy to get caught up in life and say you will just make up work the next day. Just spend 2 hours a day, everyday, studying to ensure you keep up with the material. When test time comes around you will be happy that you don't have to study 6-8 hours a day like your peers. Set up a schedule that you can adhere to and a pace that you can maintain throughout the year. Don't procrastinate. Don't obsess about honors. Nobody likes a gunner. Keep up your hobbies because you can't study all the time and relaxing is always important. Lecture is not for everyone. Don't feel obligated to go if you feel like you can study more efficiently by spending your time in the library instead. Realize this early, and you can save yourself a lot of time! Don't put off studying until the last minute! You can't cram like you did for college! Pre-reading, going to lecture, post-reading is the best! Make sure to take breaks - you'll go insane if you just study all the time! Study groups make studying fun! It's important to do well in school, but only well enough to pass. Don't get hung up on honor-ing courses and be sure to make time for the other parts of your life that make you happy (relationships, exercise, whatever is important to you). It will be important for your mental health! Schedule breaks! Occasionally, your brain will take a break whether you want it to or not. When this happens, step away from the syllabus and refuse to study for a set amount of time. Otherwise, you'll end up half-relaxing and half-studying but doing a poor job at both. You need to relax, so think of breaks as a way of making yourself more productive when you study. Find what works for you! I had to completely change how I studied upon coming to med school. Your study style may also be different for each course. Don't be afraid to try new things or to get advice from Rich Levitt or an MS-2. Have confidence in yourself. You are here for a reason. You are just as smart and work about as hard as everyone else here. Do your best and, when it comes to be the night before the exam, let it go--rest easy and go in with confidence. Anxiety will only hurt you. Remember the lovely "fire-hose" analogy; you are not going to be able to learn everything like you did in undergrad. I had to learn to get through the material quickly multiple times rather than getting bogged down in the volume by going through it slowly. Try out a few different study methods to find one that works for you. If you're still in college mode of staying up until 3am studying and then sleeping until 10am, the sooner you break the habit the better. Take a deep breath...this is just the beginning. Take time off and don’t apologize for it! Find a mentor/project for MLM and DSRP during November/December. Pre-read. Lecture is a waste without it. Sequester yourself in the library early and often. Once you do this you realize you can actually get studying done. Facebook is the devil. Pre-read, seek help early. Don't worry about what everyone else is doing to study or how much time everyone spends studying. Everyone develops their own methods. Set goals for yourself. It can be related to test scores, or as simple as understanding clinical concepts or finishing a certain amount of study material. Think about what your long-term goals (residency, board scores, knowledge for 3rd year, etc.) are before you do this and you will find your time much more productive. Stay on top of the material! Repetition and discussion are great memory devices. Don't worry about what everyone else is doing -- do what you feel like YOU need to do to reach your own personal goals. Everyone has an individual style of learning, set of interests, and opinions. When anyone tells you a class or test is easy or hard, remember it’s just that ONE person's opinion. If someone says anatomy is the toughest (or easiest) class ever, just keep the perspective. 5 FUNDAMENTALS OF BASIC SCIENCE BLOCK Medical Anatomy August 22, 2010 – October 10, 2010 Course director: Jack Schumann, Ph.D. Block: 100% of FBS Section #1 Exams: 2 written examinations (20%), 3 laboratory practicals (30%), and 1 written comprehensive final (50%) Overview Welcome to medical school! Anatomy is many things – the “real” start of medical school, a traditional rite of passage, a seven-week whirlwind tour of the body, a staggering list of Latin names to memorize, and your first look at the insides of a human being. All of your classmates will be as excited and nervous as you are. Fortunately, this class is extremely well taught and organized. Dr. Schumann is universally loved and respected for his teaching abilities, and there are countless resources available to help you succeed. Anatomy is indeed intense, but most find it to be one of the most enjoyable classes. The course is divided into three sections – the chest and abdomen, the head and neck, and the arms and legs. After each section there is a laboratory practical, each worth 10% of the final grade, where you must identify tagged “structures” (body parts) on the cadavers. Thus, you must go to lab throughout the course to familiarize yourself with the specimens. There are also three multiple-choice exams. The first two cover the first two sections and are each worth 10%, while the final is cumulative (although it is weighted toward the last section). The final is worth 50%. There are a good amount of practice questions in the back of the syllabus that can give you a feel for the exams. In General Keep up with the material. It will be difficult, but it is important to start off on the right foot, and cramming is simply not an option. The best way to memorize the many details and names is to go over them again and again. One popular strategy is to pre-read and post-read each lecture. You can pre-read the material and familiarize yourself with it beforehand, so you can really focus in the lecture. Then, you can go over it all again afterward, paying attention to the minutiae. While lab is not strictly mandatory, the experience of dissecting and the guidance of the instructors can be invaluable. It is important to visualize structures in 3-D and to understand the spatial relationships between structures. Build a map of the body in your mind. You can try drawing things out, but studying directly from the cadaver is really the best for this. Lastly, study in groups. Quizzing one another truly helps, and you can bond with your classmates while learning the material. 6 Lecture Lectures usually consist of Dr. Schumann going over the material in the syllabus systematically, pointing out the structures on blown-up Netter's illustrations. The material is presented in a highly organized fashion, and Dr. Schumann is a dynamic and enthusiastic teacher, so most people in our class went to all of the lectures, only using the podcasts for ones that they missed. Laboratory It is good to know what to expect in the lab before you get started. Your team of six will be following the instructions in a book called Grant's Dissector on how to dissect and locate the structures for the day. Some people love dissection while others get through the course without doing any. As one 2014er said, “don't feel obligated to do all the dissection. If there are gung-ho dissectors in your group, let them take over and you can use the dissection time to study.” Most of the learning comes not from the physical dissecting, which mostly involves carefully removing connective tissue, but from observing the cleaned structures afterwards. Thus, some groups split themselves into two teams of 3: one team dissects today and tomorrow demonstrates the structures to the other team. Most often, the dissection will pull directly from the preceding lecture. You can use the time during dissection to quiz one another or review prior material. Outside faculty members will be present just to help with the labs. They wander around and assist groups when needed; it is wise to find the good teachers and go to them for help. As the laboratory exam tests you on all of the cadavers, it is also good to check out the work of your classmates. Use prior exams to identify key structures; then make sure you can identify these on several different cadavers. Textbook and Syllabus Netter's Atlas of Human Anatomy is the standard text for all medical schools and one that you will use throughout your medical education. This and the syllabus, which is better organized than possibly any other you will experience in your first year, are the essentials for this course. Many students also bought Grant's Dissector, which guides you in the lab. However there are many copies available in the laboratory and you could probably get away with sharing with a friend or using a copy from the book room. Some people found Rohen's Color Atlas useful – it consists of labeled photographs of dissected specimens. Other Resources Anatomy videos. These highly-useful videos should be available on the course website. They consist of Dr. Schumann presenting a difficult section of the body in the lab. University of Michigan medical school website. Has practice questions, lab images, and dissection videos. http://anatomy.med.umich.edu Pretest Anatomy. This book has a lot of clinically-oriented practice questions Models in the anatomy lab. The plastic models and preserved dissections are excellent and sometimes used on the practicals, so make sure to get acquainted with them too. Advice from 2014 Great course! Drawing things out helps. Spend a lot of time in lab. 7 Study groups work great after you've gone through the material once. They syllabus is the bible, know every word. Quiz each other early and often. Draw out structures on the boards inPBL rooms. If not done so already, reprogram your brain now to memorization mode and eliminate all intellectual thought processes. Except those mediating the creation of clever pneumonics. Attend lectures and print out the slides beforehand. I found it very helpful to take notes directly on slides because the class is very visual. Also, break up lab amongst your group members so that you only have to dissect for 1/2 of the sections. Spend one night the weekend before the exam looking at all of the different bodies. You need to know everything in the syllabus. That's actually good news because you pretty much also don't need to anything NOT in the syllabus. This is tons of fun if you relax and don't get caught up in trying to beat all of your classmates to get Honors! You are just meeting your classmates and getting to know everyone and there are lots of fun nights out as a class. If you go to lab (whenever - doesn't have to be when designated) and make an effort to learn everything, you will do well. The syllabus is gold - all you need is that and an Anatomy Atlas to guide your studying. Also, practice questions and Rohen's are useful. Unless you absorb information super fast in class, pre-reading is really helpful. What you learn in the morning you will be dissecting in the afternoon, so pre-reading will make sure you get the most out of lab. Review the anatomy practical material with different people. Everyone will have different strengths and you can help quiz each other. Anatomy is a subject that clicks for some people and doesn't for others. Do not get discouraged if it is challenging, I promise it is the hardest course of the year and things will get better! It is really a time when you need to find the study strategies that work for you. Don't go to every lab, it is not worth the time. Do go to lab once in a while to learn the material in conjunction with lecture notes, ask questions, and review in the lab before the exam. If you are not a strong lab student, pair up with facilitators and more competent students to learn from them. Lab is useful, fun and will help cement what you learned in lecture. However, it is very time consuming. Go often, but don't feel guilty about skipping lab if you really need some more time with the books. Share the duties when it comes to dissection. Go to lecture. Don't get behind. Review what you learned on a daily basis. 2014 Class Survey In comparison to other courses, the amount of time I spent on this class was: How often did you attend lecture? 2% 2% 13% I attended most lectures 33% Less More 85% I attended every lecture 65% About the same I attended a few of the lectures Where's LR4? 8 Regarding the podcasted lectures for this course, it is best to: Not use them at all 2% 20% 7% 52% 19% How useful was Netter's Atlas of Human Anatomy? 4% Indespensible (definitely buy) Use only for missed lectures 96% Use only for review after attending lectures How useful was the course syllabus Moderate - adequately 4% organized; I still needed to rely on the textbook or slides How useful was Grant's Dissector 7% 2% Indispensable (definitely buy) 41% Very - highly organized; l studied from the syllabus almost exclusively 96% No opinion, never looked at it How useful was Rohen's Color Atlas of Anatomy 1-5 hours 39% 15% 19% >5 hours 11% Rarely, or only in preparing for an exam 37% How useful was Moore's Clinically Oriented Anatomy? 2% 9% 17% 72% Occasionally useful (use the library copy) Not worth the time or money 50% How much time, outside of the scheduled lab, did you spend in lab per week? 46% Occasionally useful (use the library copy) Indispensable (definitely buy) Occasionally useful (use the library copy) Not worth the time or money No opinion, never looked at it 9 33% Indispensable (definitely buy) Occasionally useful (use the library copy) Not worth the time or money No opinion, never looked at it Other Anatomy Web Links AnatLine – http://anatline.nlm.nih.gov/Anatline/index.html Digital Anatomist ‐ http://www9.biostr.washington.edu/da.html Gray’s Anatomy ‐ http://www.bartleby.com/107/ Instant Anatomy ‐ http://www.instantanatomy.net/ LUMEN Structure of the Human Body ‐ http://www.meddean.luc.edu/lumen/MedEd/GrossAnatomy/ Mascagni—Images from Anatomia Universa ‐ http://www.lib.uiowa.edu/hardin/mascagni/index.html Neuroanatomy Lab Resource ‐ http://courses.temple.edu/neuroanatomy/lab/index.htm University of Michigan ‐ http://anatomy.med.umich.edu/ University of Michigan Visible Human Project ‐ http://vhp.med.umich.edu/ University of Utah Neuroanatomy Atlas ‐ http://library.med.utah.edu/WebPath/HISTHTML/HISTO.html University of Utah Visible Human ‐ http://library.med.utah.edu/WebPath/HISTHTML/ANATOMY/ANATOMY.html Cardiac MRI Anatomical Atlas ‐ http://www.scmr.org/education/atlas/intro/index.html Emory Radiologic Anatomy ‐ http://www.emory.edu/ANATOMY/Radiology/Home.Page.MENU.HTML LUMEN Cross Section Tutorial ‐ http://www.lumen.luc.edu/lumen/meded/grossanatomy/x_sec/mainx_sec.htm McGill Radiologic Anatomy ‐ http://sprojects.mmi.mcgill.ca/radiology/ Wayne State Radiologic Anatomy ‐ http://www.med.wayne.edu/diagRadiology/Anatomy_Modules/Page1.html Whole Brain Atlas ‐ http://www.med.harvard.edu/AANLIB/home.html 10 Fuel Metabolism October 12, 2011 – October 27, 2011 Course director: Sidney Morris, Ph.D. Block: 25% of FBS Section # 2 Exams: 1 multiple-choice examination, worth 95% Overview After learning the entire human body in seven weeks, get ready to enjoy a semester's worth of biochemistry in two and a half weeks. This course is organized, well-run, and straightforward, with few frills. The final written exam counts for 95%, and 5% of your grade comes from a PBL write-up that should be an easy 100. Fuel Metabolism is mainly about memorizing reaction pathways and cycles, and understanding how they interact to maintain homeostasis. Again, as in anatomy, you cannot get by just with understanding the big picture – you really do have to memorize those pathways. You are not required to know molecular structures, so don't spend too much time on them. Most 2014ers would consider the course to be of average difficulty (in other words, easier than anatomy). The recommended strategy is to write out the pathways - again and again and again. Pay attention to the rate‐limiting enzymes and co‐factors. Do not fall behind. The course will be less intense than anatomy, but there is still a great deal of information. If you find yourself way behind, don't bother listening to the missed lectures. Just learn the material from the slides and focus on the learning objectives. Attending Lecture Fewer people will be in LR4 for Fuel Metabolism than for anatomy, as many in your class will begin experimenting with learning from home. This has its pros and cons. You can probably be more efficient and focused studying independently. On the other hand, it is very tempting to slack off, and you may feel behind or out of touch with the rest of the class. Dr. Morris, who gives most of the lectures, is clear and organized, and he will often point out which details you need to focus on for the exam. Textbook and Syllabus About 10% of our class recommends buying the Lippincott textbook, which provides an accessible and clear review. However, most students relied on the syllabus alone for this course. Advice from 2014 Very intense. Go to class everyday. One day means missing 8 lectures, and you can't afford that. It's kind of front-loaded so don't get overwhelmed. It's easy to want a break after anatomy, but make sure you still keep up with this class. There is a lot of information. Read the whole syllabus in the first week, so that you can review it in the second week. 11 This course is basically a recapitulation of undergraduate biochem that most people have already had. If you have the extra time and energy familiarize yourself with clinically relevant disorders now, despite the fact that they are fairly glossed over in the course, they will be important in the future. This is a hard course to get through.. if you have a really good textbook or notes from a previous biochem course, you may want to bring them from home. This will be a lot lighter than anatomy. Know going in that the syllabus and class are not as organized as anatomy was, and try not to get frustrated. Lectures often covered material that was not in the syllabus, but that means you probably don't have to know it! Focus your studying heavily on the learning objectives. You're going to be burnt out after anatomy but don't take this class lightly! Lots of info in a short time. Try to get the big concepts before you bury yourself in the details. I would suggest printing out the slides for this class, a lot of material covered wasn't in the syllabus. 2014 Class Survey In comparison to other courses, the amount of time I spent on this class was: Regarding the podcasted lectures for this course, it is best to: Not use them at all 8% 43% 49% 23% Less More 16% About the same 15% Use only for missed lectures 42% 4% How useful was the course syllabus? How often did you attend lecture? I attended every lecture 10% 25% 38% 27% Use only for review after attending lectures 10% I attended most lectures 21% Weak - poorly organized, irrelevant to tested material; I needed to rely heavily on the textbook or slides Moderate - adequately organized; I still needed to rely on the textbook or slides I attended a few of the lectures 69% Where's LR4? 12 Very - highly organized; l studied from the syllabus almost exclusively How useful was Lipincott's Illustrated Reviews: Biochemistry? 2% 15% 75% 8% Indispensable (definitely buy) Occasionally useful (use the library copy) Not worth the time or money No opinion, never looked at it 13 Human Genetics October 28, 2011 – November 22, 2011 Course director: Paula Monaghan‐Nichols, Ph.D. Block: 34% of FBS Section #2 Exams: 1 Overview Welcome to Human Genetics, a course that is pretty unique in the Pitt Med curriculum. The course has undergone a great deal of revamping over the past few years. It is divided into 5 blocks: Molecular Genetics, Genetic Disorders, Quantitative Genetics/Complex Inheritance, Developmental Disorders, and Cancer Genetics/Therapeutics. Much of the course will be in the standard lecture format and there will be one final exam. There will also be several mandatory sessions: 2-4 patient conferences, 3-5 case presentations and 5 “Team Based Learning” (TBL) sessions. TBL is a teaching method that has had great success at many other medical schools. This is the second year for TBL sessions in Human Genetics course. There will be an in-depth discussion about TBL by Dr. Monaghan‐Nichols on the first day of the class. The goal of these sessions is to encourage you to learn the material and cooperatively apply your knowledge in a team setting. A book chapter or a paper will be assigned for you to read and there will be a short quiz at the beginning of class that counts toward your final grade. You will then separate into small groups where you will take the same quiz again as a group, discussing the questions and coming to a consensus. You will then be given a group grade for the quiz as well. Then, your group will be assigned several medically relevant problems to work through. Open discussion with the faculty member running the session will follow each quiz. The hope is that everyone will bring different strengths and knowledge bases to the group that will enhance everyone in the group’s understanding of the material. Material tested during these sessions will not be tested on the final exam. While this class may seem more loosely structured than other classes, it can be a great re-energizer for the clinically oriented students. While the TBL structure may produce some anxiety, overall this course is among the least stressful test-wise. Remember This course is still being refined so don’t be surprised by anything! The best advice for this class: “Relax”, Dr. Monaghan-Nichols is trying to provide a more interactive learning environment and you can practice your peer-to-peer communication skills. Many are hesitant to embrace TBL; your enjoyment of this class in particular is heavily dependent on your approach to the group interaction, so try to make the most of it. One interesting aspect of the course is cutting edge science presented. Genetics will be a huge impact on the practice of medicine and this course will provide the base you need during your clinical years. Some of the best patient conferences will occur during this class, making it more tangibly clinically relevant. This class might help you remember why you are in medical school in the first place: the patients. 14 Advice from 2014 Don't worry about your grades in TBL. Arguing about points wastes a lot of your time. I would just read the textbook. Straight up. As with fuel, most people will have probably already had most of the basic science aspects Don't let your anger/frustration with TBLs prevent you from studying. The development lectures are the best part of this course. TBL may seem rough, but if you read the material beforehand it can give you some easy points toward the final grade. Don't get bogged down in the "anti-TBL" mentality; go in with a positive attitude and TBL can be enjoyable and you might actually learn something. If you go into TBL thinking it is a waste of time, it will be a gruesome 3 hours. Don't get too hung up on fine details. Lectures can seem complicated but the test is pretty straightforward. 2014 Class Survey In comparison to other courses, the amount of time I spent on this class was: Regarding the podcasted lectures for this course, it is best to: 2% 2% 35% 22% Less More 63% Not use them at all 14% About the same Use only for missed lectures 60% Use only for review after attending lectures 2% How useful was the course syllabus? How often did you attend lecture? 7% 14% 55% 6% I attended every lecture 24% 21% I attended most lectures Weak - poorly organized, irrelevant to tested material; I needed to rely heavily on the textbook or slides Moderate - adequately organized; I still needed to rely on the textbook or slides I attended a few of the lectures 73% Where's LR4? 15 Very - highly organized; l studied from the syllabus almost exclusively How much time did you spend studying for each TBL? How useful was Thompson & Thompson's Genetics in Medicine 4% 18% 12% <30 min 12% 30-60 min 29% 37% 12% 1-2 hrs 58% 2-4 hrs >4 hrs 16 18% Indispensable (definitely buy) Occasionally useful (use the library copy) Not worth the time or money No opinion, never looked at it Cellular and Pathologic Basis of Disease November 28, 2011 – January 12, 2012 Course directors: Donald DeFranco, Ph.D. (Cell) Cynthia Lance-Jones, Ph.D. (Cell) Lawrence Nichols, M.D. (Path) Block: 40% of FBS Section # 2 Exams: 2 (multiple-choice and short-answer items) and a histology practical examination. Overview Those with an extensive or recent background in biology will likely find this course less intense than other courses, as many of the topics will be familiar. However, this course still includes a large volume of new information no matter your background. This course encompasses cell biology, histology, and pathology. For the class of 2014, the course was organized thusly: • • • The first part of the course provided an overview of the basics of cell biology. The second part of the course included histology and several histology labs/workshops. The third part of the course focused on pathology, integrating histology and molecular biology into understanding the basis of disease. Throughout the course, the lecturers attempt to integrate all of these areas together with a focus on clinical applications. Study Tips While some of you may think this class is a breeze, only 12% of the class of 2014 said they spent less time on this course than on other courses, so the course is still a lot of work. However, don’t get bogged down by the interminable alphabet soup of proteins and the army of microscope slides that all look the same. It may seem irrelevant now, but this course is helping you form a solid base for studying organ systems in the second year. Lecture This class includes many lecturers for this class and they all have very different styles, so it’s often hard to decide which lectures to attend and how to approach them. Most of the 2014ers agree that you should study lots of images from the lectures, especially in the pathology section of the course. They can be frustrating at first, but after you look at more and more images, clarity should arise. For your class, Dr. Nichols will be instituting a 50 minute session solely devoted to looking at images. The goal of this new session is to help you learn how to interpret these images. 17 Lab/Workshops The histology labs are optional, but the course directors include them for a reason. Everyone seems to have a different opinion about the usefulness of histology lab, and a lot of it likely depends on your background. A good idea: Go the first few times. TAs and faculty wander around the lab, available for questions, and (at least some of) your classmates will also be there, available for group studying. If after one or two sessions you decide that lab is not your bag, go into lab at another time (some images are even online) or do whatever works best for you. Many students found the optional workshops especially useful. TAs and faculty walk you through several histology images and help you to see aspects you may have missed on your own. This is a good way to quiz yourself, see what you know, and ask questions. The more opportunities for practice, the better. The course also includes several TBL sessions that focus on material not taught directly in the lectures. You will be required to do outside reading from Robbin’s or lectures from prior years. See the Genetics section to get an idea of what you can expect. Textbook and Syllabus The vast majority of students thought the syllabus was very or moderately useful and didn’t need much information from outside sources. Some students expressed the opinion that Albert’s is helpful for some lectures that aren’t particularly clear or if you haven’t learned a lot of cell bio in the past and need background. It’s best used for reference—it’s a huge book and there’s no way you’ll be able to read the whole thing during the course. There are copies in the library and an online version as well. Robbins is extremely thorough and can fill in a lot of holes in your knowledge about pathology. Advice from 2014 • • • • • • • • • Loved this class! Remember to study images right off the bat. They will matter a lot on the test. Practice identifying objects in images during PBL. PBL is indispensable. Remember to go over the slides with your facilitator in a quiz fashion. Dr. Lance-Jones’ lectures are awesome. The pathology images are hard -- Go to Nichols’ review sessions. This is the most important course of the basic science blocks. Not only will you learn about general mechanisms of disease, but it will also get you in the mindset of how to approach clinical cases better than any course before it did. The first and second exam material have absolutely nothing to do with each other. Just know that and accept it. Learn the histology before the path lectures begin, as at that point there is not enough time to catch up on the histo (which is very important!) and still adequately learn the path. Look at slides whenever possible. Familiarize yourself! This is a difficult course with a lab component that will be a big part of the exam. Dr. Lance-Jones is great, very student-friendly, so ask her questions and she will help! Workshops are VERY helpful - pay close attention. Take advantage of the TAs and other faculty in the histo lab. You will get more out of it. TBLs completely replace some lectures, so be ready to spend a substantial amount of time studying. If this class is split over winter break, make sure you're caught up by the time break starts. When you get back from break the class moves really quickly and the material is really difficult. 18 2014 Class Survey In comparison to other courses, the amount of time I spent on this class was: How useful was the course syllabus? 6% 12% 30% Less 28% 60% 64% I attended every lecture 26% Not at all 6% I attended most lectures 18% I attended a few of the lectures 58% 32% Moderately 44% Where's LR4? How often did you attend the scheduled labs? Every time, or most 4% labs 4% Not use them at all Some labs 16% Use only for missed lectures 10% 4% Very Indispensable Regarding the podcasted lectures for this course, it is best to: 2% Very - highly organized; l studied from the syllabus almost exclusively How useful did you find attending histology labs? How often did you attend lecture? 10% Moderate - adequately organized; I still needed to rely on the textbook or slides More About the same 6% Weak - poorly organized, irrelevant to tested material; I needed to rely heavily on the textbook or slides 68% 18% 74% Use only for review after attending lectures 19 I did them on my own outside of the scheduled time There was a histology lab? How much time did you spend studying for each TBL? How useful was Robbins's Pathologic Basis of Disease? 4% 20% 6% 12% <30 min 30-60 min 32% 32% 18% 1-2 hrs 2-4 hrs 70% >4 hrs How useful was Alberts's Molecular Biology of the Cell 2% 12% 8% 78% 6% Indispensable (definitely buy) Occasionally useful (use the library copy) Not worth the time or money No opinion, never looked at it 20 Indispensable (definitely buy) Occasionally useful (use the library copy) Not worth the time or money No opinion, never looked at it Immunology in Health and Disease January 13, 2012 – February 8, 2012 Course directors: Christine Milcarek, Ph.D. Marc Levesque M.D., Ph.D Block: 48% of FBS Section #3 Exams: 1 Overview The first week of the course covers the basics of innate and adaptive immunity, specifically focusing on the components of cell-mediated and humoral immunity—everything you ever wanted to know about B-cells and Tcells. For this part of the course, many students found the Abbas text helpful to fill in gaps and see the big picture. After setting this foundation, the lecturers provide introductions to immunologic tolerance, immunodeficiency syndromes, and rheumatic diseases. The class of 2014 had a single graded final exam with one scheduled study day prior to it. There was a non-graded in-class practice exam approximately half-way through the course to gauge your own understanding of the material. In addition, the course directors provide additional practice exams online. Lecture One point of difference in our class survey for most courses, including this one, is the importance of attending lecture. Some people go to lecture, and some don’t. By the time you reach this course, you will know to which group you belong. Some of the survey participants thought that the combination of the Abbas textbook, adequate syllabus notes, and access to lecture recordings on the class website made attendance of lectures an optional activity. Some people feel that lectures keep students involved in the course, motivate them to keep up with studies, and at times the instructors will point blank tell you what material they will test you on. Unfortunately, the useful Abbas text doesn’t include much information on the rheumatology portion of this course, which makes skipping lectures a less viable option once the second half rolls around. Textbooks/Syllabus The core text for the first part of this course is Basic Immunology, 3rd edition, 2006–7, by Abbas and Lichtman. This is one of the few texts in the MS-1 year where you can see a consensus as to its usefulness. The majority of the class found this text to be clearly written and illustrated, easy to read, and a good tool for enhancing your understanding of the material presented in the lectures and syllabus. In fact, many of the lecturers will use figures from this text in their Powerpoint presentations, or refer to specific sections in the syllabus. The rheumatology section of the course claimed Klippel’s Primer on Rheumatic Diseases as its text. However, the majority of the class of 2014 didn’t use it. 21 Study Tips One of the challenges in the first part of the course is to note the different surface markers on important cells and remember which cytokines are involved in each response—making tables seemed to be a popular approach to this end. Many 2014ers read Abbas cover to cover during this time, and many found material outside the syllabus helpful. For the rheumatology portion: It is important to fully grasp the differences between the different rheumatic diseases, as some found this to be a large concept on the exam. Many in our class, again, found it useful to devise tables comparing the different rheumatic diseases causes, epidemiology, symptoms, etc. The exam included many details from the syllabus that were not emphasized in class. Advice from 2014 • • • • • • • • • • I don't know if it is always like it was for us, but the exam focused very heavily on the Rheumatological diseases we learned in the latter 1/3 of the course rather than the basic science of immunology. Make sure you know your autoimmunity! Every time you come across an important molecule, try to commit its function to memory (or make an Excel sheet) or you'll be swimming in a sea of ILs and CDs by the end of the class. I found the powerpoints more helpful than the syllabus in many instances. The Abbas textbook is a great starting point and worth skimming, especially on sections that you find weaker. Abbas is a GREAT book, and reading that was the equivalent of the first half or so of the course material. Immuno is a long course- try not to procrastinate even if the exam seems like it's not for a long time!! Just read abbas, go to rheumatology lectures. If you don't have immuno background, buy the Abbas book and read it as early in the course as possible. Definitely put in the time to read the text book! It summarizes lots of confusing lectures into elementary level understanding. Read textbook in the beginning for a foundation for the rest of the course. Make diagrams especially on the maturation of certain cells. At the start of the course make lists of 1) the different receptors outside of cells, and 2) cytokines!!! VERY IMPORTANT to do this if you want to make things easier on yourself later on. Don’t skimp on the Rheumatology! It is a large part of the exam. 2014 Class Survey In comparison to other courses, the amount of time I spent on this class was: 12% 16% How often did you attend lecture? 10% 16% Less 29% More 72% About the same 45% I attended every lecture I attended most lectures I attended a few of the lectures Where's LR4? 22 Regarding the podcasted lectures for this course, it is best to: Not use them at all 6% 2% 53% 2% Use only for review after attending lectures Use instead of the live lectures 98% How useful was the course syllabus? How useful was Abbas's Basic Immunology? Weak - poorly organized, irrelevant to tested material; I needed to rely heavily on the textbook or slides 10% 35% Indispensable (definitely buy) Occasionally useful (use the library copy) Not worth the time or money No opinion, never looked at it Use only for missed lectures 21% 18% How useful was the Primer on Rheumatic Diseases 55% 2% Moderate - adequately organized; I still needed to rely on the textbook or slides 16% 18% 64% Very - highly organized; l studied from the syllabus almost exclusively 23 Indispensable (definitely buy) Occasionally useful (use the library copy) Not worth the time or money No opinion, never looked at it Microbiology February 9, 2012 – March 8, 2012 Course directors: Peter Veldcamp, MD Bruce McClane, Ph.D. Block: 52% of FBS Section #3 Exams: 1 Overview Micro is, undoubtedly, one of the most difficult courses of the first year. For many it is at least on par with Anatomy for volume and difficulty of material. While the material may seem overwhelming, maintaining a strict daily study schedule makes the class manageable. Many students find this to be one of their favorite first year courses. Micro obviously has a very strong clinical focus and wide utility for any specialty of medicine and is pretty high yield for the boards, so hard work in this course will likely pay off in the future. The course is divided up by concept (pathogen biology, infectious cycle, etc.) and not by individual pathogen, so it might be worthwhile to use a textbook that organizes it by pathogens, or many students created charts to keep the material organized. Ours and previous classes really liked “Clinical Microbiology Made Ridiculously Simple”, which provided great mnemonics and memory aids for the multiple drugs and bugs. Other students opted for the flashcard approach (homemade or buying MicroCards) and found that to be useful for conquering the material. Whatever method(s) you choose, it’s crucial to get organized from the start and keep on top of things. The course is front‐loaded with information (i.e. the antibiotic lectures). Don’t fret, this eases up as the course moves on and is designed to give you ample time to commit the harder material to memory. Take advantage of this and do your best to keep up! Lecture After anatomy, lecture attendance tends to drop off in the following classes, but we saw a large resurgence during micro. Most of us felt the lectures were quality and worth attending. Some of the lecturers are among the most inspiring during the first year. Also, the returning course directors are great and are very present throughout the course. In addition, there are weekly, optional quizzes that are not podcasted or posted online. Many students felt this was a good way to test their knowledge and get a feel for what the exam might be like. Textbooks/Syllabus Most of us didn’t use the recommended textbooks. The syllabus is well organized and contains everything you need to know. Many people found “Clinical Microbiology Made Ridiculously Simple” to be a good investment. It organizes the material by pathogen (different approach from the syllabus) and contains lots of cheesy memory aids. Lab There is a required lab portion which links with what you do in PBL. In the lab you will learn some common microbiology techniques with the help of your TAs (who will be current micro grad. students). You’ll be required to 24 wear a lab coat, so make sure you are prepared. Overall, the lab is well-run with clear instructions and competent TAs. The material from lab and PBL will be on the exam, so you should have an idea on how to perform and interpret the different tests. Study tips You will be expected to know the defining characteristics of pathogens and other details covered in the syllabus. Everything you need to know is in the syllabus, so you shouldn’t need to rely heavily on any outside materials, aside from clarification. Know lab stuff, as there are always a couple questions that should be easy points provided you paid attention. There are lots of practice questions online and in the syllabus, plus the weekly quizzes, if you went. Advice from Class of 2014: The introduction to antibiotics at the beginning of the course makes more sense once you review it at the end of course. It may seem very confusing at first, but with time, the drugs will become more familiar and make more sense! This class is amazing, but PACKED with information. Most of the lectures are pretty entertaining, which helps when it comes to studying. Just get ready to memorize. Great class! Table/Chart-o-mania! Start memorizing the tables early. Awesome class. A TON of work, but important and very interesting. Lecturers are wonderful for this class. Learn the different antibiotics early on! It will make the course much easier as you progress. Definitely the one course NOT to fall behind on. The good thing about this course is that they give you the antibiotics table early (and well-formatted!). Carry this chart around to peek at it during down times - on the bus... in PBL - do this starting from when you get it, and it won't be so overwhelming come exam time. Despite being heavy on memorization, this course is very well-organized! Make sure you keep up with micro because it's very fast-paced and easy to fall behind. Know the syllabus well and you'll be fine. The course is extremely dense and requires a great deal of work. The practice quizzes were helpful and a good representation of test questions. Lots of memorizing of bugs and drugs! But put in the time and you will be fine. Good teaching faculty for this course so try going to lectures. A very challenging course, but don't let all the rumors about how hard it is psych you out. There's a bit more material than in other courses, and I spent more time on this course than I had on others, but I think I would have been just fine if I'd just kept up my previous study skills, plus I would have been far less stressed out. Find some way of organizing the material for yourself from Day 1 (flashcards, spreadsheets, etc.). There is a lot of material you'll need to memorize cold. Front loaded. Really important to keep up in this course. Lots of new material and new words are going to be thrown at you every day. This course is every bit as intense as you've heard. Stay on your game and you'll be fine, though. Do yourself a favor and learn the drugs early. Also help yourself out by cold-memorizing the Gram + / - early. This will make the rest of the course easier. Awesome class. Start memorizing tables early. Make notecards. Get people to quiz you. I found this class very interesting, but very challenging. The pace is much faster than other classes. I bought MicroCards and found them extremely helpful. Each time a disease was covered in class, I went through its MicroCard. 25 Make sure you have the basics covered in the first couple of weeks so you have plenty of time to memorize. Start memorizing the bugs early. 2014 Class Survey In comparison to other courses, the amount of time I spent on this class was: How useful was the course syllabus? 2% 10% 8% Less Moderate - adequately organized; I still needed to rely on the textbook or slides More About the same 88% 92% Very - highly organized; l studied from the syllabus almost exclusively How useful was Clinical Microbiology Made Ridiculously Simple? How often did you attend lecture? I attended every lecture 12% 34% 14% I attended most lectures 38% I attended a few of the lectures 40% 6% Regarding the podcasted lectures for this course, it is best to: Not use them at all 14% Use only for missed lectures 16% 66% 24% 32% Where's LR4? 4% Weak - poorly organized, irrelevant to tested material; I needed to rely heavily on the textbook or slides Use only for review after attending lectures Use instead of the live lectures 26 Indispensable (definitely buy) Occasionally useful (use the library copy) Not worth the time or money No opinion, never looked at it ORGAN SYSTEM AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY BLOCK Neuroscience March 19, 2012 – May 4, 2012 Course director: Allen Humphrey, Ph.D. Block: 80% of OPS Section #1 Exams: 2 Overview You are (hopefully) relaxed and refreshed from spring break, and ready to start the Organ Systems block. Neuroscience is a challenging but enjoyable course; dense but fair. Dr. Humphrey is easygoing and accessible. The course is divided into two sections each followed by an exam, with the second exam being cumulative. The first section has by far the most material, covering neuroanatomy and sensory perception. The second section focuses on motor pathways, pathology, and related pharmacology. The course uses the familiar lecture format, with a variety of useful extras: labs, clinical conferences, PBLs, and self-study exercises. The labs allow you to experience neuroanatomy in 3D by using gross specimens (the brains from your Anatomy cadavers) and models. The clinical conferences bring together about sixteen students with a faculty member who guides them through several clinical cases, with plenty of time for questions and clarification. For the class of 2014, the exams had three parts: multiple-choice, short-answer, and structure identification. The structure identification part is like a digital laboratory practical: Dr. Humphrey will bring up CT scans, MRIs, pictures of gross specimens, or pictures from Haines, and you will be asked to identify something that is labeled on the picture. For the short-answer questions, one student notes, “Be prepared to synthesize, integrate, and justify answers on exams more than the other classes.” These questions may be similar to your clinical conference cases; they were for our class. Attending Lecture For Neuroscience, it is worthwhile to go to class. As one student pointed out, “If you have become accustomed to not attending lectures at this point - beware. Dr. Humphrey does not like the lecture recordings and will occasionally find excuses not to record the lectures to encourage attendance. For many lectures that feature videos of patients, the lecture recordings really don't allow you to appreciate the neurological findings anyway.” Dr. Humphrey really does seem to want you in class. Although the recordings are (usually) there, he does not facilitate podcast-learning. He, and other lecturers, like to use the laser pointer instead of the mouse, making the neuroanatomy lectures difficult to follow on podcast. 27 Study tips This course is heavily front-loaded, and the material at the beginning (anatomy) is foundational for the remainder. So study hard the first two weeks. The neuroanatomy can be challenging, especially for those who have not taken a neuroscience course before. You will eventually get a feel for looking at sections and CT scans. Test yourself repetitively on the images provided online and those in Haines. There will be videos presented during the lectures and posted online that can help you with a 3D understanding. After the first two weeks, the course becomes much more manageable. “Find the lesion” questions will certainly appear on your exams, so quiz one another on the sensory/motor pathways. Laboratory There are four laboratory sessions. These sessions involve following a text to locate different structures, and you are free to proceed at your own pace, or not to come at all. While most students attended the first lab, the later sessions become more optional because they refer to Haines or online material instead of the gross specimens. You can complete these independently, but make sure you understand them well. The material from the labs and self-study exercises is not necessarily covered in the lectures, but is represented on the exams. Textbook and Syllabus The syllabus is fairly well-organized. Dr. Humphrey's lecture notes are high-quality, but the same cannot be said of some of the other lectures. There are three textbooks for this course. Netter's you already have. Haines is indispensable, as the laboratory exercises refer to it constantly, and its images are part of the pool for exam questions. Blumenfeld is much more of a traditional textbook. It has illustrations and CT/MR images with a clear narration. In addition, it has sample cases that can be useful for lesion practice. Still, most 2014ers recommend that you stick with the library copy. Advice from 2014 • • • • • • • Attend all the lectures! This class is awesome -- lectures are great. Fast to start, slow on the back end. The syllabus and the Blumenfeld text complement each other very nicely. Also the clinical conferences were very informative. Especially in the beginning, neuro can be a confusing course for those who are not anatomy-oriented. But the second half is more clinically applicable and enjoyable. You need to have a solid understanding of neuroanatomy to do well, especially the spinal cord tracts. DO NOT blow off the labs - they form the foundation of most of the course. This course was organized in a bit of a confusing way. I'm not sure I have great advice about how to make it less confusing. I'd start by mastering a physical representation of the 4 main tracts and the cranial nerves/nuclei 28 • • • • • • using the syllabus, the lab manual, and the online "videos" as well as some outside medical schools' websites. This may seem a bit backwards, but mastering these tracts will make everything else much easier to understand. Great class, but very difficult. Neuro is an interesting subject with a lot of material to learn. Do your best to stay on top of it especially for the first exam; the second exam is WAY easier to catch up on material. Haines is filled with useful images and has practice questions, some of which are used for the test directly. Learn the anatomy!! especially brain stem anatomy Only go to the first lab, the others can be done online. Study images for both exams! Also, know that the tests have some short (i.e. one word- one sentence) answer questions. Lectures often aren't recorded due to patient videos, so be sure to go as much as possible. Well organized. I would recommend High-Yield Neuroanatomy if you have never done Neuro before in college. It was a lifesaver in helping me to understand and it has diagrams that had just the right amount of detail. Also, make use of the plethora or resources on the course website - it is especially helpful to go over the images a few days before the test. This class is pretty awesome. Labs are COMPLETELY useless. Learn the neuroanatomy in a clinical way (learn it in association with a particular lesion). Dr. Humphrey is great at answering your individual questions. He's on the M floor and is very willing to help you if you're having difficulty. 2014 Class Survey In comparison to other courses, the amount of time I spent on this class was: How often did you attend lecture? I attended every lecture 18% 12% 14% Less 20% About the same 70% 32% More 34% Regarding the podcasted lectures, for this course it is best to: 14% 2% 62% I attended a few of the lectures Where's LR4? How useful was the course syllabus? Not use the recordings at all. 16%6% I attended most lectures 20% Use the recordings only for missed lectures. Use the recordings only for review after attending lectures. Use the recordings instead of the live lectures. 80% 29 Weak - poorly organized, irrelevant to tested material; I needed to rely heavily on the textbook or slides Moderate - adequately organized; I still needed to rely on the textbook or slides How useful was Haines's Neuroanatomy? How useful was Blumenfeld's Neuroanatomy through Clinical Cases? Indispensable (definitely buy) 2% Indispensable (definitely buy) Occasionally useful (use the library copy) 28% 70% 10% Not worth the time or money 58% 24% 8% No opinion, I never looked at it Occasionally useful (use the library copy) Not worth the time or money No opinion, I never looked at it 30 Introduction to Psychiatry May 7, 2012 – May 18, 2012 Course director: Jason Rosenstock, M.D. Block: 20% of OPS Section #1 Exams: 1 (multiple choice plus a written mental status exam) Overview The end is in sight! Intro to Psych is definitely less intense than the previous courses; however, some students find it easy to slack off and get behind at this time of the year, making the course harder than it should be. Hang in there and stay on top of the work for the final two weeks before summer “freedom” (Dean’s SRP, anyone?). The course does have a lot of scheduled class time, with many required small group sessions, patient conferences, and lectures. You also learn the details of a mental status exam and write-up, and practice one for small group, and you’ll do another based on a video during the final exam. Lecture By now you should certainly know your lecture preferences. Most of our class found the lectures worthwhile, and Dr. Rosenstock enjoys group discussions and class input. Dr. Tew’s psychopharmacology lectures also involved chalkboard diagrams and tables, which do not translate to the podcasts. The 2014ers who attended Dr. Tew’s lectures highly recommend them. Small Groups These mandatory sessions usually involve discussing a patient interview that was shown in class. Thus, make sure you attend the screening in LR4 or you’ll be lost and/or useless for the discussion. Consider using the mental status exam checklist in the syllabus to take notes while watching these videos. These videos become good practice for the write-up you’ll turn in before the exam, and the second one you’ll do during the exam. Writing a MSE is fairly easy once you know what to look for. Textbook/Syllabus No need to spend any money on a text for this class. Dr. Rosenstock has clearly put a lot of effort into making the syllabus well organized and thorough. You shouldn’t need an outside text, and if you find yourself interested in more information or clarification, the library reserves or online resources should be sufficient. Advice from 2014 • Loved this course - the amount of material was bountiful without being overwhelming, and it was pretty neat to see a human face on illness (finally) after all year of basic science. Sit back and enjoy this basic intro to Psych. 31 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Pysch is a really awesome class. Lectures are interesting and worth going to. Syllabus is really complete. I found the syllabus very thorough. You could read it without attending class and be OK for the most part. Even if you don't have any intention of going into psych, do still go to class. Because WPIC is so phenomenal, many of the lecturers are literally the world's leading experts in their fields and the insight they are able to offer far exceeds that seen in psych courses at other medical schools. Go to class- the lecturers are amazing and there may not be slides for every presentation. Super informative, engaging, yet pretty stress-free class. Enjoy it! Try going to class! Lectures are a lot more fun than in other courses. I liked going to class to keep myself motivated at the end of the school year, but I'm sure reading the syllabus would have been sufficient and much more time-efficient. My favorite lecturer was Dr. Tew; you should try to go to his because he is an excellent, engaging, and funny teacher and also because he tends to write on the board rather than use powerpoint, so listening online may be hard. This test is harder than the behavioral medicine one, so don't be fooled into thinking you can completely coast! Use lectures to supplement the syllabus, not the other way around. You'll definitely need to know the diagnostic criteria, but the neurobiology was also a significant portion of the test. So do not take the neurobiology lightly even though neuroscience ended. Also, I stopped attending lectures since it was more efficient to go over the material by myself than going to lecture. It's very interesting and has great lecturers. Definitely take advantage of the patient presentations (the one on Depression is particularly good). Dr. Tew gives really good lectures, but doesn't use powerpoints, so if you typically don't go to lectures then you might want to go to his because they're somewhat more difficult to follow online. Feel free to skip lecture if you don't find it useful, but attend all of the patient interviews and such. It makes the material a lot easier to remember when you can connect the symptoms/disorder to a real patient. Make sure to go to Dr. Burton's lectures, he won't let them be recorded. Great class - a good way to unwind after neuro but before summer vacation starts. Still keep up with the material though! Coming to class is really helpful, it really decreased the amount of time I felt I had to "study." 2014 Class Survey In comparison to other classes, the amount of time I spent on this class was Regarding the podcasted lectures, for this course it is best to: 4% 4% 15% Not use the recordings at all 7% Less 26% About the same 81% More 43% Use the recordings only for missed lectures Use the recording for review only after ttending lectures Use the recordings instead of live lectures 32 How often did you attend lecture? 10% 19% How useful was the course syllabus? I attended every lecture 26% 45% 2% I attended most lectures I attended a few of the lectures 98% Where's LR4? 33 Moderate - adequately organized; I still needed to rely on the slides Very - highly organized; l studied from the syllabus almost exclusively INTRODUCTION TO PATENT CARE BLOCK Medical Interviewing August 25, 2011 – October 20, 2011 Course director: Donald Middleton, M.D. Reed Van Deusen, M.D., MPH Block: 50% of IPC Section #1 Exams: 0, grade is based on evaluation from facilitator Overview Medical Interviewing is your chance to get started with one of the most essential clinical skills. This is a wonderful opportunity to practice interviewing in a “risk-free” environment, with a standardized patient. Do not assume that you will be good at interviewing because you are good with people, outgoing, or whatever. Interviewing can be difficult for everyone, and takes a lot of practice. The course mostly consists of small-group sessions discussed below, plus a large-group discussion and demonstration. At the end of the course there will also be a “clinical interviewing assessment”. You will do a full interview with a standardized patient with only your facilitator watching, and receive detailed feedback on both your strengths and weaknesses as an interviewer. The grading for this course is extraordinarily subjective. Don't worry about your grade – you will not fail, and shooting for honors is probably not worth the anxiety. Just relax, be yourself, and have fun! Small-group This course only meets once a week and your group will likely split into two. Each person gets a turn on the “hot seat”, interviewing the standardized patient, while your peers watch. This can be intimidating, but don't worry. You will soon realize that everyone makes mistakes, and nobody knows what they are doing at first. You are given a chance to call “time out” if you feel stuck, and this option is used pretty often! During a “time out” you are able to collect your thoughts, ask for help, or rewind to start the interview over again. And remember, no matter what happens, your classmates are required to compliment you afterwards (seriously). All comments are strictly limited to positive reinforcement which is a great self-esteem booster. The session will focus on one aspect of the patient's history. Each student will get a turn to talk to the SP, with the option to pick up where the previous interviewer left off, or to start afresh. It is strongly recommended to volunteer to go first or second in the hot seat. If you wait until the end, you may feel as if you're just going over things your peers have already covered. Do not take this as a clinical exercise or try to figure out what your patient has – this course is just about learning how to do the interview. Some students expressed annoyance at the political-correctness of the class. For instance, you will be required to give only positive feedback to your peers. Don't let this get to you. You will definitely get some constructive criticism from the facilitators. No matter how “touchy-feely” the class gets, you will definitely get a lot out of it if you participate. 34 Textbook/syllabus Most members of the class of 2014 did not find it necessary to purchase the textbook for this class, but it does provided useful incite to the art of interviewing. Advice from 2014 • • • • • • • • • Have fun! Read the book if you want honors. It's really awkward to do the interviews in front of people but you'll get used to it. Very facilitator dependent. Helps to read ahead of time so you know how to move through an interview then use the class to pick up subtle points and learn your weaknesses. Most of the people who complained that there were unclear expectations didn’t do the assigned reading. I never prepared for medical interviewing, and I did just fine. Just take it easy and don't be nervous. It may be a bit of a drag to have MI right after exams, but just consider that it's good to just get it out of the way. If you're looking for honors, focus less on trying to get actual information from your standardized patient that attending to their emotional wellbeing and trying to get them to cry. It's going to seem awkward but it actually gets better. And in the end you'll realize your interview skills actually did get better. Make the most of it. Pitt has a great clinical piece to their curriculum, and while it does add a significant amount of time to your week, it is a skill that should be practiced early on. Read the textbook and cite it in class to get Honors. It's online, so there's no reason not to! Plus, this course will change your life! I talk to people differently now! 2014 Class Survey How useful was the Medical Interviewing textbook? Indispensable (definitely buy) 6% 47% 39% 8% Occasionally useful (use the library copy) Not worth the time or money No opinion, I never looked at it 35 Introduction to Physical Examination October 24, 2011 – December 16, 2011 Course director: Melissa McNeil, M.D., M.P.H. Block: 50% of IPC Section #1 Exams: 1 practical standardized patient exam Overview Now for the fun stuff that drove you to med school! This class introduces you to the technique of physical exam in a totally relaxed atmosphere. You’ll learn how to use your stethoscope and how to look at retinas without butting heads/locking lips with your patient. The goal is to master the general flow and mechanics of a physical exam. No worries—you aren’t going to be reamed if you can’t identify another student’s murmur or get a precise jugular venous pressure. Your goal should be to learn the basics and feel comfortable with the choreography of the classic physical exam. However, do not mistake the relaxed nature of this course as an indication that the skills are unimportant. They are important, and in a short time (i.e., in February) you will perform these techniques in a hospital with real patients. The course consists of lectures by faculty and small groups led by MS-4s. At the end of the course you perform complete physical exams on standardized patients. The first attempt is for practice; you get valuable feedback from the standardized patient (who is well versed in the aspects of the physical examination). Then you’ll perform one last physical examination, about a week later, for a grade. Have fun and practice, practice, practice. These skills don’t come naturally. The more you practice on classmates, friends, and family, the easier (and less awkward) your physical exam experience will be later on. Lecture Lecture is usually once a week, and Dr. McNeil gives almost all of them. Lectures are broken down by organ system, and they include slides, videos, references to Bates (an important text), and clinical pearls. Again, a lot of the information may seem like too much to handle, but remember the focus is on the how for now; the what and why will come later, with additional courses and experience. Many 2014ers found that their small group 4th-years were able to reinforce these concepts from lecture very well. Small Group Small group is typically facilitated by two MS-4s. This is your opportunity to practice examination skills on each other. Groups are broken down by gender to minimize potential awkwardness (though one of your standardized patients will be of the opposite sex). You’ll get up close and personal with your classmates, but this is an excellent chance to gain competency with your examination skills—with input and practical advice from the 4th-years. Use this time to gain insights and tricks of the trade from the 4th year medical students. They are a great reference and often give the most useful advice on how to easily operate your instruments. 36 One challenge with this course: You learn lots of physical exam techniques, you practice them in small groups, but you perform only some of them during your final exam. The important parts for the final exam are clearly laid out in a list—make sure you know that list, and practice physical exams that follow the list. Many students find it useful to spend time outside of class practicing on friends, roommates, family, or any willing volunteer. The more you practice, the more confident you will be for your final exam. Textbook It is said that by the end of second year you will know Bates from cover to cover. At this point it is not imperative that you master Bates, but it is a valuable resource to have handy while learning the physical examination. Most of our class found it to be a worthy investment even at this early stage. Special Note on Equipment Dr. McNeil asked that we tell you two important tips about the equipment you will need for physical exam: 1. Buy the necessary equipment before the class starts. You will hit the ground running in this class and it’s important you come prepared your first day. 2. BUY QUALITY EQUPIMENT. A large portion of the class of 2014 purchased lesser grade stethoscopes and oto/opthalmascopes online much to the chagrin of our professors and MS-4 instructors. Obviously everyone has a different budget, but it’s a good idea to buy the best quality equipment you can afford, it will save you money in the long run. Many people ended up buying the better versions later after their $99 sets started breaking. If you have questions about what to purchase or what brands, you can contact Dr. McNeil. Advice from 2014 • • • • • • • • Great class. Felt like I was actually learning practical skills. This is helpful because the fourth years give you practical tips, knowledge, and good lines for doing the physical exam. Practice, practice, practice. You'll thank yourself later. You can find good equipment for cheaper than the school sale. Check out Amazon. Lots of fun. There is a checklist in your syllabus of the full physical exam you'll need to do with a Standardized Patient for your final exam. Memorize this! Practice it often until you can run through it without even thinking and you'll breeze past the final exam. Pay attention! You need to know this stuff! Also, get a nice stethoscope - you will need it forever and ever! The lectures are helpful. You really have to prepare for this class for it to be useful - especially for the small groups. It truly is what you make of it - if you want to slack off, you can, and vice versa. The MS4s really want to see you succeed, so don't hesitate to ask them if you need extra help 37 2014 Class Survey How much did you spend on your equipment (stethoscope, otoscope, etc.)? 2% 10% 2% How useful was Bate's Guide to Physical Examination? $0-$200 $201-$400 24% 0% $401-$600 $601-$800 31% 31% 16% 16% 68% $801-$1000 $1000+ How often did you attend lecture? Regarding the podcasted lectures, for this course it is best to: 2% Not use the recordings at all 33% 22% 33% 6% 6% Indispensable (definitely buy) Occasionally useful (use the library copy) Not worth the time or money No opinion, I never looked at it I attended every lecture 12% I attended most lecutres Use the recordings only for missed lectures Use the recording only for review after attending lectures Use the recordings instead of the live lectures No comment, I never used the recordings 29% 57% I attended a few of the lectures Where's LR4? 38 Advanced Physical Examination January 2011 – May 2011 Course directors: Scott Herrle, M.D. Orooj Fasiudden, M.D. Kishore Vellody, M.D. Block: 43% of IPC Section #2 Exams: 0, grade based on facilitator evaluations Overview Advanced Physical Exam 1 (APE1) is your first opportunity to perform the skills you learned from IPE on real patients! No more classmates or actors. The scheduling may appear complicated for this course, but the fullgroup session on the first day will help clarify the details. Essentially, during a month when you have PE scheduled you’ll perform physical exams, write H&P’s, and possibly present patients to your fellow group members. You’ll be in a small group (typically 3 other students) with one faculty A great deal of effort is put in to identifying a patient for each student, but sometimes a patient will decline, in which case you’ll end up tag-teaming a physical exam. Some preceptors will migrate in and out of rooms to provide feedback and advice to students. If you think you found some interesting pathology be sure to tell your facilitator. It’s never too early to start listening for murmurs or various lung sounds. It’s also helpful to make your own list of what to do/ask for the history and physical. Don’t feel like you have to do everything from memory (as was the case for your IPE ‘final physical’). Use example H&P’s as a template, and be willing to accept constructive criticism from classmates and facilitators. In addition to interviewing and examining patients, you will have two larger sessions pertaining to Ophthalmology and ENT. Additionally, during the Neuroscience and Psychiatry courses you will have neurological and psychiatric exam/interviewing sessions pertaining to the current coursework. Remember This is the only time when you will have the opportunity to take 1‐2 hours on doing a complete history and physical. Take your time, ask for help and suggestions from your facilitator, and try not to feel too embarrassed in front of the patients. Most of them understand you are only a first-year, and are surprisingly willing to help. Advice from 2014 • Don't get frustrated with the lack of consistency among facilitators/groups. Just use every opportunity to learn from interacting with patients, that's what you came to school for! don't be worrying about your basic science coursework, enjoy your clinical time! Textbooks Many students found Maxwell Quick Medical Reference to be very useful. It’s small enough 39 to fit in your white coat, and inexpensive. As mentioned for IPE, Bates is also a valuable resource for the History and Physical. 40 Clinical Experiences January 2012 – May 2012 Course directors: Shanta Zimmer, M.D. Yaqin Xia, M.D. Laura Panko, M.D. Block: 43% of IPC Section #2 Exams: 1 Overview CE1 and CE2 are similar to APE in that you go out for some real patient contact one afternoon a week. In general, they are more laid back, with no requirement except that you observe. CE3 requires you to do 4 sessions at a community site of your choice – they range from a walk-in clinic to a soup kitchen. You will have an introductory lecture at the beginning of the semester to attempt to explain the confusing logistics of the course. If you feel confused after the first session, don’t worry, you will receive a personalized schedule in your mailbox that will outline where you need to be for each of your CE sessions. Learning Logs Fill out your learning log right after the session so that you don't forget anything, Learning logs only take a few minutes to complete so don’t let them pile up. If you do, it will be difficult to remember all your patient interactions at the end of the semester, so save yourself the headache and complete them as soon as you get home. Tips Make the most of this opportunity to interact with patients. Every preceptor is different, and for some students it may just be a shadowing experience. Even so, ask questions and volunteer to help when you can. The physicians are very receptive to first year medical students, and your time will be much more enjoyable if you are inquisitive and remain interested in all the patient cases. For CE1 and CE2, remember to bring the evaluation form to the last session, and have the preceptor fill it out in front of you and give it back so that you can hand it in. This is much easier than counting on the preceptor to fax it in on his or her own. You can fulfill your CE3 requirements at any time, not just in the assigned month. Definitely take advantage of this – you can do your sessions over the summer or strategically at times of lower workload. This gives you one month with an extra afternoon off. The exam is really no sweat. Nobody has ever failed it. Just familiarize yourself with the readings and go to the review session. You will be adequately prepared. 41 PATIENT PHYSICIAN AND SOCIETY BLOCK Introduction to Being a Physician August 15, 2011 – August 19, 2011 Course director: Shanta M. Zimmer, M.D. Block: 20% of PPS Block Section #1 Exams: 0, grade is based on participation in small group activities Overview This is a week-long introductory course that does just what the name suggests – it gives you a taste of what it means to be a physician, with emphasis on how doctors communicate with a range of patients and interface with larger public health issues. The course is essentially effortless and, moreover, lots of fun. You just need to show up to some small groups, attend some panels and patient presentations, and go to a session with a service organization in an underserved community in the Mon Valley. The course is essentially an extension of orientation, with no books and no grades. This week serves as an opportunity to just relax before Anatomy gets underway. Lecture You will be attending some lectures and panels with physicians and public health people. You’ll also attend some patient conferences, during which patients with chronic diseases will describe their experiences with their physicians and the health care system. Small Groups You will have some mandatory-attendance small group activities, including a visit to a service organization in the Mon Valley. Textbook/Syllabus There is a small syllabus that will provide readings that complement the lectures and small group sessions. 42 Ethics, Law, and Professionalism August 26, 2011 – December 7, 2011 Course directors: Charissa Pacella, M.D. Course directors: Melissa McNeil, M.D., MPH Block: 100% of PPS Section #1 Exams: 1 Overview ELP is another important non basic science course, where you discuss the hot legal and ethical issues in medicine. The course consists of weekly lectures by experts in the field of ethics and law, many of which are followed by a PBL session. There is a multiple-choice final exam worth 75% and a midterm paper worth 25%. For the class of 2014, the paper was a detailed explanation of how you would respond to a given ethical dilemma. This, like MDM, is a class that could be extremely useful for the rest of your career. The legal aspects of issues such as end-of-life care and abortion are essential for any physician. The ethical discussions in PBL are well worthwhile – they will be interesting and you will certainly get a deeper appreciation for the subject. If you are attentive and put effort into this course, you will be sure to get a lot out of the small group discussions. Textbook/Syllabus The syllabus contains reading assignments that are supposed to be completed before that week's class. They are also fair game for the exam. Some of the readings come from the textbook, O'Rourke's Health Care Ethics. Because content from these readings appear on the exam too, it is one that you should probably buy. Tips The course directors are not fans of podcasting, and encourage lecture attendance. Most 2014ers made the effort to go to all, or at least most of the ELP lectures. Most of the lecturers are knowledgeable and enthusiastic, particularly Dr. Meisel and Dr. Arnold. They will keep you engaged, so you will learn a lot of important lessons for the rest of your career just by showing up. The small group sessions usually involve discussing a hand-out with several ethical dilemmas. These can be great experiences if the group members speak up and express themselves respectfully. Often, after listening to others, you will find yourself questioning your own previous values, and refining your stance on the issue. At the end of the course, you will vote for 2 of your small group members who made the most significant contributions to your discussion. The two students with the most votes from each group receive 5 bonus points on the exam. You shouldn’t be worrying about the bonus points during the discussion, instead focus on the discussion and you will fare much better in the course…it’s only 5 points. Most 2014ers thought that the exam was ambiguous (for several questions multiple answers could potentially be correct). Still, it was not overly difficult. It was the sort of exam where it would be hard to do either well or poorly. Just keep up with readings for the course, go through the slides once more before the exam, and you will do fine. 43 Advice from 2014 • • • • • • • Go to class every now and then. It's actually pretty entertaining! It is very tempting to skip this class because of how intense anatomy is. I say give in to your temptations (but do learn the material at some point). Go to lectures if you think they're interesting. If not, stay home and read the syllabus. The exam had a surprising amount of detailed quiz questions. I recommend attending lectures, since they are fairly interesting, and then just studying right before the exam. No need to study tons during the course. The readings are worthwhile if you have time. A lot of it may seem self-explanatory, but there's random information that is actually quite useful that you may not have known before. If you want to get Honors, study HARD for the exam Seems simple and common-sense, but the test is more detailed than the common-sense knowledge. 2014 Class Survey Regarding the podcasted lectures, for this course it is best to: 4% Not use the recordings at all 6% How often did you attend lectures? 8% I attended every lecture 18% I attended most lecutres 33% 46% I attended a few of the lectures 41% 44% Where's LR4? How useful was the course syllabus? Weak - poorly organized, irrelevant to tested material; I need to rely heavily on the textbook or slides 8% 49% 43% Moderate - adequately organized; I still need to rely on the textbook or slides Very - highly organized; I studied from the syllabus almost exclusively 44 Use the recordings only for missed lectures Use the recording only for review after attending lectures Use the recordings instead of the live lectures Behavioral Medicine January 4, 2012 – May 9, 2012 Course director: Jason Rosenstock, M.D. Block: 100% of PPS, Section #2 Exams: 1 Overview Behavioral Medicine casts a wide net. In contrast to the science courses, it is one of the few courses that examines non-biological factors that influence a patient’s health. It emphasizes social and psychological components of health and disease and sets its eye particularly upon subjects that traditionally frustrate doctors: patient non-adherence, obesity, substance abuse, and the like. If you liked your social science courses in college, you’ll probably like this course. Remember It’s easy to blow off this course (and any other course taught on Wednesday morning), and it’s no secret that we devote the bulk of our time and energy to the science courses. (Our schedule is set up that way, after all.) However, courses like Behavioral Medicine put your learning into a larger context and bring up vital issues that might not surface again until you’re dealing with patients during clinical rotations—and then you’ll be even busier. If you miss these points now, you may miss out on something important for a long time. Lecture and Assignments Dr. Rosenstock gives some of the lectures, and he finds quality guest lecturers for the others. He takes into account our exam schedule, and the Wednesday before an exam usually does not have class. Experts in relevant fields lead the small group sessions and the sessions often begin with a pre-written case. In addition to small groups, this course included two graded assignments: • A Behavioral Modification Project, in which you chose to either improve your diet or create a more productive exercise plan. In past years, students chose from a detailed list of 3 options, but your class will have a more expanded list of potential modifications to choose from. You then try to make this change for a month and keep track of your progress. At the end of this time, you present your results to your small group. This is a great project for future physicians to identify how hard it is to change lifestyle habits. It gives you the opportunity to put yourself in the patient role as you try to live a healthier lifestyle. • A Pain Interview, in which you interview someone who has experienced “clinically significant” pain and then write a short paper about it. Dr. Rosenstock provides you with detailed instructions on how to accomplish this project and how it will be graded, as well as example pain interviews, so it should be straightforward. 45 • A change for the class of 2015: Dr. Rosenstock will require you to do a couple of brief narratives on patients with lifestyle issues that you’ve encountered in other contexts. These assignments will be required but not graded. Syllabus The syllabus for this course is fairly well organized. However, because lecture styles vary dramatically, the information in the syllabus ranges from detailed descriptions to copies of Powerpoint presentations. Pre-reading was not necessary. However, much of the multiple-choice portion of the exam was taken from the syllabus. Exam The exam is straightforward; if you study a couple hours for it, you should be fine—especially if you attended lectures. Make sure to attend Dr. Rosentstock’s review lecture the week before the exam. Advice from 2014 • • • • • • • • Don't leave the written assignments for the last day before they're due. They are worth half your grade, and they will take longer to finish than you expect them to (especially the pain interview). I attended very few lectures - everything is in the syllabus! The exam had a surprising amount of detailed quiz questions. I recommend attending lectures, since they are fairly interesting, and then just studying right before the exam. No need to study tons during the course. The readings are worthwhile if you have time. Another well-intentioned and ultimately fairly shallow course. Exam questions came pretty much exclusively from the syllabus. A lot of it will be self-explanatory and the whole course could probably be summed up in 30 minutes. Study straight from the syllabus. The pain interview paper is VERY time consuming - plan ahead! You don't get much out of attending lectures because they don't go in depth much. Plan ahead for the papers, you will thank yourself later. This class has useful PBL sessions where you talk to patients but a…useless lecture component. 2014 Class Survey 46 Regarding the podcasted lectures, for this course it is best to: How often did you attend lecture? 4% I attended every lecture 38% 30% Not use the recordings at all 23% I attended most lecutres 2% 32% I attended a few of the lectures 28% How useful was the syllabus? Weak - poorly organized, irrelevant to tested material; I need to rely heavily on the textbook or slides Moderate - adequately 2% 38% 60% organized; I still need to rely on the textbook or slides Very - highly organized; I studied from the syllabus almost exclusively 47 43% Use the recordings only for missed lectures Use the recording only for review after attending lectures SCIENTIFIC REASONING IN MEDICINE BLOCK Medical Decision Making August 24, 2011 – December 24, 2011 Course director: Margaret Hsieh, M.D. Block: 100% of SRM Section #1 Exams: 1 Overview MDM intends to teach you how to evaluate experimental design and wade through the numbers in scientific papers. The course, as many 2014ers commented, is actually exceedingly important. Not only will you be able to use the terms “odds ratio” and “relative risk” fluently, but you will be able to judge the worthiness of articles you come across in your career. Unfortunately, the lectures take place at 8:00 am every Wednesday, which resulted in single-digit attendance for our class. 75% of the course grade comes from a multiple-choice final exam, 15% comes from your participation in small groups, and 10% from a 30 minute presentation about an article for your PBL group. One big caveat: Dr. Rao, the instructor for 2014 and the author of the required text, is replaced by Dr. Margaret Hsieh for the class of 2015. All of this advice is based on Dr. Rao’s class, so take it with a grain of salt! Try this revised class out for yourself before making decisions based off of last year’s class. Textbook/Syllabus Our syllabus did not have course notes, just the articles and exercises for the small group sessions. The textbook is written by Dr. Rao. For us, it had all of the information you need for the course, including the same examples Dr. Rao used in lecture. A good portion of the people in our class ignored the lectures and learned everything from the book. The book uses simple language and does not assume you have a background in math. Study Tips Most students would strongly recommend learning the material in the textbook on pace with the course, attending lecture to supplement your understanding. If you keep up with the class, you can get help from your PBL facilitators. Usually there is plenty of time to review the course material in each PBL. Advice from 2014 Try to figure out from the syllabus what you need to do when. It's poorly organized, so looking at it last minute won't help. Not worth going to. It's incredibly early and Dr. Rao read directly from his slides, which is his book verbatim. Just buy the book and read it on your own and go over the slides. Exam was really easy. 48 Just read his book. It's the same as the lecture. You'll need strong, strong coffee for the lectures. The book has the same material, but it doesn't have to be read at 8 am every Wednesday. Appreciate the Wednesday morning sleep-in (e.g. just skip lecture) ! I hope they never change the start time for this course, though I hear Dr. Rao is leaving next year. Dr. Rao's lectures were verbatim from his book, so either attend lecture or just read the book, though if you skip lecture you get to sleep in. If you make an honest stab at the homework assignments, you'll be in better shape for the final. Basically though, as long as you read the book (or review the lecture slides) before the exam, you'll be fine. Read the book and the slides, and listen to the podcasts if you're having trouble following either of them. Make sure to buy Dr. Rao's book. Also, don't get carried away with the statistical calculations, this course is more focused on the big idea and use of these statistical tests. You won’t realize the importance of this class until later on. Just try forcing yourself to learn the material because it IS actually useful. Read the book and do the homework and you will do fine in the course. 2014 Class Survey How often did you attend lecture? How useful was the course syllabus? I attended every lecture 40% 11% 11% 38% 11% I attended most lectures 52% 37% I attended a few of the lectures Very - highly organized; l studied from the syllabus almost exclusively Where's LR4? Regarding the podcasted lectures, for this course it is best to: How useful was Rao's Rational Medical Decision Making? Not use the recordings at all 15% 17% 4% 21% 43% Weak - poorly organized, irrelevant to tested material; I needed to rely heavily on the textbook or slides Moderate - adequately organized; I still needed to rely on the textbook or slides 2% 6% 9% Use the recordings only for missed lectures Use the recordings for review only after attending lectures Use the recordings instead of live lectures 83% 49 Indispensable (definitely buy) Occasionally useful (use the library copy) Not worth the time or money No opinion, I never looked at it Methods & Logic in Medicine 1 January 5, 2011 – May 18, 2011 Course directors: Rachel Givelber, M.D. Course directors: Peter Drain, Ph.D. Block: 100% of SRM, Section #2 Exams: 0 Overview Following winter break, Methods and Logic in Medicine (MLM) replaces Medical Decision Making in the Wednesday morning time slot. The good news for those who love their sleep is MLM isn’t scheduled for every week. The MLM course follows a two-part format: MLM A and MLM B. MLM A is designed to get you thinking about your scholarly project (yes, already). In this half of the course, you invent a research project that you could feasibly perform while in medical school, and you present this idea to your small group. For most students, this is a chance to present and receive feedback on their Dean’s Summer Research Project presentation. (However, don’t be concerned if you have other plans for the summer and are not planning to submit an SRP; you get a chance to invent a purely hypothetical project, which might be more fun.) After presenting your project, you get feedback from both a student in your small group and the course facilitators; at the end of the course, you submit a final plan for your project incorporating these comments. For MLM B, the course directors provide you with clinical vignettes, and you conduct a literature search to identify an article relevant to the patient’s condition. Some of your classmates are assigned to critique the paper you choose. When Wednesday rolls around, you present the article (with trusty Powerpoint) as classmates and faculty raise comments and questions about the scientific method of the paper.(If you’re confused about the process, don’t worry; the course directors outline it in plenty of detail.) Textbooks There are no textbooks for MLM. Hints and tips Our class found MLM to be somewhat disorganized, and at times the requirements for presentations and responses to articles were unclear. The course is completely run through the Learning Portfolios (LPs) site on The Zone, which can be a bit confusing at first. There are three different hierarchies to the LPs (see below). Small group discussions and the dissemination of general course information occur through discussion boards on the LPs, and the default setting is to send you an email letting you know someone has posted a new discussion, but without the content 50 of the message itself. It would be worth spending a few minutes familiarizing yourself with the Learning Portfolios site: • Methods & Logic in Medicine: This is the main site for the entire course. Course announcements are posted here, as are course documents (including those with the course schedule and descriptions of the different tasks), articles for MLM A, and clinical vignettes for MLM B. • Small Group ##: This site is for your small group. It is where you self-assign roles for each week. Presentations and evaluations from small group members are to be posted to the documents section prior to each class. • YOUR NAME—Learning Portfolio: This is your individual learning portfolio. You can post presentations, documents, and article responses and correspond with your facilitators in a site that is open to you and course faculty only. Throughout MLM, you play various roles. One week, you may have to present an article, while the next you only critique a classmate’s article. Signing up for your role early using your small group LP will allow you to get your pick of article, small group role and the date on which you present, which may help manage your workload if you know you will be gone certain weekends or especially busy with exams. Although articles were only released a week ahead of time for MLM A, individual small groups usually pre-assigned roles and dates for the entire course during the first small group meeting. This helped with planning and coordinating so that we all met the role requirements. Other Advice: • • • • • Prepare your presentation early! There are a lot of requirements for article presentations, so if it is your turn to present, make sure you start early. It was common for people to spend 2–3 hours preparing their presentations. Do not forget about the training modules. The syllabus hardly makes mention of them, but there will be several mandatory training modules that you must complete online. Most people are able to test out of them without actually going through the module. Don't expect organization or consistency from the course directors, and despite what they say, don't feel like you need to have a definite scholarly project by the end of first year. If you love research, you'll love MLM and MDM. If not, you won't. As with many of the non-core science courses (and the science courses, for that matter), you get out of this course what you put into it. 51 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the classes of 2013 and especially 2014 for their input in creating this document. Also, we thank Rich Levitt and the previous SARC coordinators, John Luiza, Russel Spingarn, and Luke Johnson. 52