Dayton Celebrates Glass: Chihuly, Littleton, Labino and Beyond Logistics: When necessary, divide into groups of 10; for children, one chaperone/10 students. Remind visitors of museum manners [due to the fragile medium, this is important for all visitors]: Maintain 2 foot distance from objects Walk and move carefully Don’t touch Speak quietly Allow time for people to react to what they see within each section. If needed, escort people to the Tom Chapman interpretive room to avoid too many people in one section at a time. Layout: The exhibition is loosely organized by processes employed to create the objects. Theme: Dayton Celebrates Glass showcases the Dayton region’s love of studio glass, ranging from the early pioneers of the studio movement through today’s artistic innovators. The phrase “studio glass” identifies artists who separated glass making from industrial production to experiment with form, rather than create traditionally functional objects, such as glassware and vases. Stations: 20 minute (youth) tour Objective: To convey the narrative of the studio glass movement, as taught by the pioneers to their students, and to experience the variety of ways each generation adapted the innovations of their predecessors. Stations Pioneers in Glass Process: Blown Glass Second Generation – Hot Glass Fused and Cast Glass Lampwork and Flamework Cold Glass Topic -Emphasize Chihuly, as most familiar name, and one of his Macchia, then mention his connection to Littleton (his teacher) and Labino and their efforts in Toledo -Lino Tagliapietra -Dan Dailey: expression/reaction -Steven Powell: abstraction/connect to Tagliapietra -Toots Zynsky/student of Chihuly/Fused Glass -Harue Shimomoto/student of Zynsky -Marc Peiser/Cast Glass -Paul Stankard/botanical/small work -Christopher Ries/cold sculpting/botanical/large work 1 Station 1 Pioneers in Glass 20-minute (youth) tour Process: blown glass Used for centuries by gathering a mass of molten glass on the end of a hollow metal pole, called a blowpipe, and enlarging it by blowing through the pipe The pioneers made blown glass into more expressive and colorful shapes, also liberated movement of blowpipe to expand size and create organic forms Dale Chihuly (American, born 1941) Background: The exhibition starts with Chihuly, one of the most well known names in studio glass; the acrylic paintings at beginning of show illustrate his work in another fluid medium Biography: Chihuly a student of one of the first pioneers, Harvey Littleton at UW-Madison, graduated in 1967 o went to Venice, Italy to learn from its long tradition of glass-making with team effort, and to RISD, where he also taught, o established Pilchuck Glass School in 1971 north of Seattle, Washington (he was originally from Tacoma, Washington) Questions: Chihuly was a “pioneer” – what does that mean? How can an artist be a “pioneer”? Ask participants who has heard of Chihuly and what do they associate with Chihuly glass? Lead this question to discussion of the Macchia series, such as . . . Crimson Lake Macchia with Chrome Yellow Lip Wrap, c. 1997, blown glass Background: Macchia refers to the Italian word for “spotted”; combined with colors and shapes, alludes to natural objects, such as stones, shells Developed when Chihuly challenged himself to create a method that would employ many colors, which he added during the blowing process Prompt: Notice differences between inside and outside of the macchia Question: How does light effect how you perceive the colors? More variation on outside than inside; different patterns outside and in; colorful shadows cast Prompt: Ask viewers to compare Macchia to work by Littleton (Ruby and Blue Double Descending Arc, c. 1983) and Labino (Golden Vase with Encased Design, 1970) in this section. Lead viewers to recognize that the organic form and suspended color of the Macchia illustrate Chihuly’s expansion of methods employed by the two men credited with originating the Studio Glass movement in the 1960s, Harvey Littleton, who was Chihuly’s teacher at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Dominick Labino. In 1962, Littleton convinced the Toledo Museum of Art to host a workshop with Labino to demonstrate glass as a medium for contemporary art. 2 Lino Tagliapietra (Italian, born 1934); Dinosaur, c. 2000 Background: Biography: Born on the island of Murano (Venice), Italy -In 1979, he brought the techniques of Venetian glassblowing to the Pilchuck Glass School at Chihuly’s invitation, which had profound effects on the studio glass movement both in the United States and around the world. His work noted for its complexity, elegance, and often a filigree technique known as vetro a reticello (translation: glass with a small network). Questions: How many textures do you recognize in the glass? How do the textures, colors and lines effect the visual appearance? Station 2: Second Generation—Hot Glass Dan Dailey (American, born 1947) 20-minute (youth) tour Righteous, 2013 Background: Biography: founded the glass program at the Massachusetts College of Art and worked for Christallerie Daum and Steuben Glass Process: blown glass, sandblasted and acid polished which accounts for the surface effects; observe the tonal variations in the head and shirt Question: Dailey employs the process of blown glass to create figures, in this example, quite naturalistically. He also aims to tell a story. What story does this tell you? Is it funny, disappointing, contradictory . . . ? Steven Powell (American, born 1951) Licking Purple Manic, 2001 Background: Biography: first studied ceramics at Centre College, then earned an MFA in ceramics at Louisiana State University, where he also first encountered glass making. He returned to Centre College to teach and founded a glass program Process: Murrini (Italian for glass rolled through a pattern – revived by Venetians in the 16th century): blown glass rolled through pattern composed of colored glass beads – linked to Tagliapietra’s layering of threaded glass (look back to Dinosaur) and Chihuly’s Macchia Artist’s aim: emotional expression through color Questions: The artist wants to be gestural, in a way comparable to Claude Monet, Jackson Pollock – ask viewers to think about how this applies (vivid color: lines and shapes created via expansion of glass rather than individually controlled by the artist) Relative to this physical quality, the artist compares his pieces to the form of the human body. Transition Question: Which object in the next section do you think is by a student of Chihuly? Why? 3 Station 3 Fused and Cast Glass 20-minute (youth) tour Toots Zynsky (American, 1951) Ebbing Chaos, 1997 Background: Biography: studied at RISD (1971) when Chihuly was there, also attended Pilchuck Glass School and studied in Venice o her work combines qualities of sculpture, painting and decorative arts o she thinks of the glass threads like painting – note flow of color, resembles brushstrokes o she’s challenged by the movement and fragility of glass Process: Fused Glass -- fired at a very high temperature and often slumped o she starts with glass threads arranged in a disk shape; the disk is slumped over a core, placed in kiln, and the object’s shape adjusted by hand occasionally Harue Shimomoto (American, contemporary) Yume, 2014 Background: Earned a Master of Fine Arts at the University of Wisconsin-Madison; a student of Toots Zynsky Question: How is her work similar and different from Zynsky’s? Is there anything about this work that reminds you of a painting? glass threads fused into loose disks and suspended; colors and shapes also resemble swirled brushstrokes. Note that Shimomoto changes the relationship of the glasswork to gravity. Mark Peiser (American, born 1938) Behind the Mountain, c. 1980s Background: earned a Bachelor of Science in Design from the Illinois Institute of Technology; the first Resident Glass Craftsman at Penland School of Crafts in North Carolina Process: Cast Glass – made with a mold Prompt: Note the play of solids and voids; flat circular surface looks concave from certain angles and colors change; colors cast in shadow Question: How does the title relate to the object? Interpretive Area (good space to wait if stations get backed up) Tom Chapman Biography: posted on exhibition signs – a Dayton artist and teacher; like many studio glass artists, he employed both Venetian and Western techniques 4 Station 4 Lampwork and Flamework 20-minute (youth) tour Both names identify a process with a long history, using a torch or lamp to melt glass and then blow or shape with tools or by hand Paul Stankard (American, born 1943) Golden Orb Cloistered Column with Blossom, Flowers, Plants, Figures & Insects, c. 2000 Process (relevant for all objects in this case): Lampwork -- uses torches to heat glass then manipulate it – in this example to adhere tiny, glass shapes to each other before embedding in transparent glass orb Question: How many shapes can you identify? Transition: Stankard exemplifies how artist’s work in miniature, in contrast the next section includes an oversize representation of a botanical subject . . . Station 5 Cold Glass Process: Optic Glass starts with cold glass that is transformed by cutting, etching, and grinding, to name a few methods Christopher Ries (American, born 1952) Sunflower IV, c. 2012 (1100 pounds, 43” diameter) Background: Biography: raised near Columbus, OH; studied ceramics at OSU – study of glazing led to interest in glass o MFA UW Madison; began career as glass blower, switched to sculpting cold glass in the 1970s Process: utilized various methods applied to cold glass, including cutting, grinding and polishing o used gold leaf on petals – enhances light effect o forms reflect internally, transmit abstract shapes Question: Ask participants to describe the optical experience: as viewer moves around the object, forms enlarge and shrink; seem both close-up and faraway; shifts in detail, color make the sculpture visually dynamic Conclusion Questions: If you were to become an artist who created with glass, which process would you use? Which artist would you call for advice? Encourage visitors to revisit the sections before exiting to look at other examples. 5 Dayton Celebrates Glass: Chihuly, Littleton, Labino and Beyond Logistics: When necessary, divide into groups of 10; for children, one chaperone/10 students. Remind visitors of museum manners [due to the fragile medium, this is important for all visitors]: Stay 2 feet away from objects -- Walk and move carefully -- Don’t touch -- Speak quietly Allow time for people to react to what they see within each section If needed, escort people to the Tom Chapman interpretive room to avoid if sections back up. Layout: The exhibition is loosely organized by processes employed to create the objects. Theme: Dayton Celebrates Glass showcases the Dayton region’s love of studio glass, ranging from the early pioneers of the studio movement through today’s artistic innovators. The phrase “studio glass” identifies artists who separated glass making from industrial production to experiment with form, rather than create traditionally functional objects, such as glassware and vases. Stations: 40 minute (adult) tour Objectives: To convey the innovative techniques and artistic expression that led to recognition of pioneers of the studio glass movement To convey the narrative of the studio glass movement, as taught by the pioneers to their students, and to experience the variety of ways each generation adapted the innovations of their predecessors. Stations Pioneers in Glass Second Generation – Hot Glass Fused and Cast Glass Lampwork or Flamework Cold Glass Topic -Emphasize Chihuly, as most familiar name, and one of his Macchia, then connect him to Littleton (his teacher) and Labino and their efforts in Toledo -Connect Chihuly’s Navajo Blanket series to work of his student, Morris, Petroglyph -Mention Lino Tagliapietra and the importance of the tradition of Venetian glass-making for many of these artists, including Chihuly -Mary Shafer/slumping/student of Chihuly -Martin Blank: abstract -Peter Houk: naturalistic -Steven Powell: murrini/motion/connect to Tagliapietra -Toots Zynsky: student of Chihuly/fused glass -Shimomoto: student of Zynsky -Marc Peiser: cast glass -Paul Stankard: botanical/small work Christopher Ries: cold sculpting/botanical/large work 6 Station 1 Pioneers in Glass 40-minute (adult) tour Process: blown glass Used for centuries by gathering a mass of molten glass on the end of a hollow metal pole, called a blowpipe, and enlarging it by blowing through the pipe The pioneers made blown glass into more expressive and colorful shapes, also liberated movement of metal pipe to expand size and create organic forms Dale Chihuly (American, born 1941) Background: The exhibition starts with Chihuly, one of the most well known names in studio glass; the acrylic paintings at beginning of show illustrate his work in another fluid medium Biography: Chihuly a student of one of the first pioneers, Harvey Littleton at UW-Madison, graduated in 1967 o went to Venice, Italy to learn from its long tradition of glass-making with team effort, and to RISD, where he also taught, o established Pilchuck Glass School in 1971 north of Seattle, Washington (he was originally from Tacoma, Washington) Navajo Horse Blanket Cylinder, 1976 -part of Navajo Blanket series -process: one of Chihuly’s most important innovations – to roll hot glass onto a pattern of glass threads – called it drawing on glass -Narrative: nearby, William Morris’ Petroglyph Vessel, 1991 (American, born 1956) – Chihuly’s student and studio assistant– here also “drawing” with glass and shared interest in historic motifs; simplified figures against fields of color Crimson Lake Macchia with Chrome Yellow Lip Wrap, c. 1997, blown glass Background: Macchia refers to the Italian word for “spotted”; combined with colors and shapes, alludes to natural objects, such as stones, shells Developed when Chihuly challenged himself to create a method that would employ many colors, which he added during the blowing process Prompt: Notice differences between inside and outside of the macchia Question: How does light effect how you perceive the colors? More variation on outside than inside; different patterns outside and in; colorful shadows cast 7 Prompt: Ask viewers to compare Macchia to work by Littleton and Labino in this section. Lead viewers to recognize that the organic form and suspended color of the Macchia illustrate Chihuly’s expansion of methods employed by the two men credited with originating the Studio Glass movement in the 1960s, Harvey Littleton, who was Chihuly’s teacher at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Dominick Labino. Harvey Littleton (American, 1922-2013) Background: o Biography: his father directed research at Corning Glass; -Harvey trained in ceramics at Cranbrook School of Art in Bloomfield Hills, MI -turned to glass while teaching at UW-Madison, inspired to create glass in which expressive form was more important than function – gave him the freedom to experiment with process -streamlined process to make it easier to learn than industrial process Ruby and Blue Double Descending Arc, c. 1983: interested in color, but more so in the strength of form, the frozen movement – this matters most; simultaneously shows inside and outside, merging and separation; stretches color through space Dominick Labino (American, 1910-87) Background: o Biography: In charge of glassmaking at a milk bottle plant in Clarion, Pennsylvania, then a plant in Ohio -Considered himself an inventor rather than an artist and holds more than sixty patents in the U.S. for industrial glass processes, including the heat-resistant fibers used in space shuttles. Golden Vase with Encased Design, 1970: abstract color pattern Collaboration: 1962 – Littleton convinces Toledo Museum of Art to host workshop with Labino to demonstrate glass as a medium for contemporary art. Innovation: combined Littleton’s small furnace, inspired by his study of glass in Venice, with Labino’s low melting point fiberglass beads. Mary Schaffer (American, born 1947); Three by Four, 1998 Background: Biography: Studied painting at RISD in 1960s, and graduated with a degree in illustration; turned to glass in 1970s, and learned from Chihuly o Recognized worldwide as one of the founding artists of the American Studio Glass Movement. o Slumping: known as a pioneer of ‘slumped’ glass -- a technique in which objects are made in a kiln by shaping glass over molds at high temperatures 8 She began mixing glass and metal tools, casting, dipping and slumping glass from objects found in flea markets and junk yards, and innovatively extending her materials to include light, bronze, steel, stone and glass, water and sound. Here a combination of mass-produced object and unique artistic creation Question: How is “slumping” similar to Chihuly’s Macchia or the work by Littleton? To some extent, permits molten glass to assume natural organic forms as it is heated and cooled. Lino Tagliapietra (Italian, born 1934); Dinosaur, c. 2000 Background: Biography: Born on the island of Murano (Venice), Italy o In 1979, he brought the techniques of Venetian glassblowing to the Pilchuck Glass School at Chihuly’s invitation, which had profound effects on the studio glass movement both in the United States and around the world. His work noted for its complexity, elegance, and often, a filigree technique known as vetro a reticello (translation: glass with a small network). Question: How many textures do you recognize in the glass? How do the textures, colors and lines effect the visual appearance? 9 Station 2: Second Generation—Hot Glass 40-minute (adult) tour Peter Houk (American, contemporary); Big Dig Tacoma #4 (2011) or #14 (2013) Background: Biography: from Dayton, OH; now Director of the Glass Lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Process: Blown glass combined with landscape imagery created with the Graal technique, an engraving process incorporated into blown glass Prompt: note how the images seem simultaneously familiar and mysterious Martin Blank (American, born 1962) Amber Quiver II, 2012 Background: Biography: Earned a Bachelor of Fine Arts from the Rhode Island School of Design, then worked with Chihuly Process: called hot sculpted glass – turns molten glass into components for sculpture Prompt: note how light enhances the texture, swirling colors of glass and shadows, and rippling edges of the glass – flow and motion important qualities of his work Question: How does the title Quiver apply to what you see? Steven Powell (American, born 1951) Licking Purple Manic, 2001 Background: Biography: first studied ceramics at Centre College, then earned an MFA in ceramics at Louisiana State University, where he also first encountered glass making. He returned to Centre College to teach and founded a glass program Process: Murrini (Italian for glass rolled through a pattern – revived by Venetians in the 16th century): blown glass rolled through pattern composed of colored glass beads – linked to Tagliapietra’s layering of threaded glass (look back to Dinosaur) and Chihuly’s Macchia Artist’s aim: emotional expression through color Questions: The artist wants to be gestural, in a way comparable to Claude Monet, Jackson Pollock – ask viewers to think about how this applies (vivid color: lines and shapes created via expansion of glass rather than individually controlled by the artist) Relative to the gestural quality, the artist compares his pieces to the form of the human body Transition Question: Which object in the next section do you think is by a student of Chihuly? Why? 10 Station 3 Fused and Cast Glass 40-minute (adult) tour Toots Zynsky (American, 1951) Ebbing Chaos, 1997 Background: Biography: studied at RISD (1971) when Chihuly was there, also attended Pilchuck Glass School and studied in Venice o her work combines qualities of sculpture, painting and decorative arts o she thinks of the glass threads like painting – note flow of color, resembles brushstrokes o she’s challenged by the movement and fragility of glass Process: Fused Glass -- fired at a very high temperature and often slumped o she starts with glass threads arranged in a disk shape; the disk is slumped over a core, placed in kiln, and the object’s shape adjusted by hand occasionally Harue Shimomoto (American, contemporary) Yume, 2014 Background: Earned a Master of Fine Arts at the University of Wisconsin-Madison; a student of Toots Zynsky Question: How is her work similar and different from Zynsky’s? Is there anything about this work that reminds you of a painting? glass threads fused into loose disks and suspended; colors and shapes also resemble swirled brushstrokes. Note that Shimomoto changes the relationship of the glasswork to gravity. Mark Peiser (American, born 1938) Behind the Mountain, c. 1980s Background: earned a Bachelor of Science in Design from the Illinois Institute of Technology; the first Resident Glass Craftsman at Penland School of Crafts in North Carolina Process: Cast Glass – made with a mold Prompt: Note the geometric shapes; play of solids and voids; flat circular surface looks concave from certain angles and colors change; colorful shadows cast Question: How does the title relate to the object? Interpretive Area (good space to wait if stations get backed up) Tom Chapman Biography: posted on exhibition signs – a Dayton artist and teacher; like many studio glass artists, he employed both Venetian and Western techniques 11 Station 4 Lampwork and Flamework 40-minute (adult) tour Both names identify a process with a long history, using a torch or lamp to melt glass and then blow or shape with tools or by hand Paul Stankard (American, born 1943) Golden Orb Cloistered Column with Blossom, Flowers, Plants, Figures & Insects, c. 2000 Process (relevant for all objects in this case): Lampwork -- uses torches to heat glass then manipulate it – in this example to adhere tiny, glass shapes to each other before embedding in transparent glass orb Question: How many shapes can you identify? Transition: Stankard exemplifies how artist’s work in miniature, in contrast the next section includes an oversize representation of a botanical subject . . . Station 5 Cold Glass Process: Optic Glass starts with cold glass that is transformed by cutting, etching, and grinding, to name a few methods Christopher Ries (American, born 1952) Sunflower IV, c. 2012 (1100 pounds, 43” diameter) Background: Biography: raised near Columbus, OH; studied ceramics at OSU – study of glazing led to interest in glass; o MFA UW Madison; began career as glass blower, switched to sculpting cold glass in the 1970s Process: utilized various methods applied to cold glass, including cutting, grinding and polishing o used gold leaf on petals – enhances light effect o forms reflect internally, transmit abstract shapes Question: Ask participants to describe the optical experience: as viewer moves around the object, forms enlarge and shrink; seem both close-up and faraway; shifts in detail, color make the sculpture visually dynamic Conclusion Questions: Which artist or process was most interesting? Seemed most difficult or most innovative? Encourage visitors to revisit the sections before exiting to look at other examples. 12