Project title:
Lead project Beneficiary/proponent:
Other beneficiaries (if any):
Location(s): Regions/Municipalities affected by the project
Total investment estimated:

Preparatory activities (planning documentation, technical documentation, land acquisition etc.)

Construction works

Supervision
Financial resources secured/financing:
Including indication of source/s
Responsible or authorized person for contact:
Name – Position:
Email address - Telephone:
Institutional set up:
Sector Lead Ministry
Department for policy
Head of Department
Department responsible for IPA projects and international assisstance
Head of Department
Division responsible for project preparation
Head of Division
Names of Project managers responsible for project preparation
Division responsible for project monitoring of implementation
Head of Division
Names of Project managers responsible for project monitoring of implementation
Other key ministries/institutions involved

A. EU policies
Demonstrate project's consistency/coherence with the relevant EU policies by mentioning specific Goals
– Targets – Objectives – Programs – Measures to which the project is referred.
B. IPA priorities - Country Strategy Paper
Demonstrate project's consistency/coherence with the CSP by mentioning specific Goals – Targets –
Objectives – Programs – Measures to which the project is referred.
C. National Strategic Framework
Demonstrate project's consistency/coherence with the following National Strategies by mentioning specific Goals – Targets – Objectives – Programs –
Measures to which the project is referred:
National Priorities for International
Assistance (NAD) 2014-2017 with 2020 projections
National Programme for the Adoption of the Acquis (NPAA)
National Sustainable Development Strategy
(priority 4. Development of infrastructure and balanced regional development)
D. Sector referenced Strategies
Demonstrate project's consistency/coherence with the Sector Strategies by mentioning specific
Strategy/ies - Goals – Targets – Objectives –
Programs – Measures to which the project is referred.
2

Strategic relevance- criteria
Strategic relevance- Assessment factors Brief justification
1. Integrated waste management
A. Type of waste
What is the type of waste addressed by the project a.
Hazardous waste b.
Non hazardous waste c.
Inert waste
B. Collection of waste
Will the project invest in: a.
Collection infrastructure and regional storages of hazardous waste b.
Collection and transport infrastructure to increase municipal waste collection rates including transfer stations c.
No collection system
C. Increasing of waste recycling
Will the project support recycling of waste by: a.
Source separation system (for different waste streams), and/or
“green islands" (for paper, plastic and glass), etc., and/or recycling yards and/or Secondary separation
(Recycling facility), as part of the
Regional Waste management centre b.
Processing facilities for recovery of re-usable materials (end of waste) of special waste streams in line with the Law on waste management
D. Waste treatment
Will the project provide: a.
National Hazardous waste treatment plant for hazardous and medical waste or other facility for industrial hazardous waste treatment b.
Mechanical biological treatment plant or Composting facility, as part of the Regional Waste management centre c.
Incineration plant for municipal waste with energy production or other facility for municipal waste treatment, as part of the Regional
Waste management centre a |_| b |_| c |_| a |_| b |_| c |_| a |_| b |_| a |_| b |_| c |_|
3

2. Reduction of negative impact of waste
3. Impact on local development
4. Impact on environment and population
E. Waste disposal
Will the project provide: a.
Hazardous waste landfill b.
Fully compliant regional sanitary landfill for municipal waste as part of the Regional Waste management centre
Will the project provide investments for: a.
Management (remediation) of contaminated sites, hot spots, etc. with high risk to the environment and human health b.
Closure and rehabilitation of noncompliant landfills for municipal waste
What is the expected impact of the project on local economic development a.
Direct new jobs potential or safeguarding existing jobs in the short/medium term 1 b.
In-direct new jobs potential 2 in the short/medium term 3 c.
No employment potential at this stage.
A. The area of the project 4 , according to the spatial environmental differentiation in the Spatial Plan of
Serbia, is determined as 5 : a.
Area of polluted and degraded environment b.
Area of endangered environment c.
Area of qualitative environment or area of very qualitative environment
B. Number of population impacted by the project a.
More than 400,000 b.
Between 200,000 and 400,000 c.
Less than 200,000 a |_| b|_| a |_| b|_| a |_| b |_|
c |_| a |_| b |_| c |_| a |_| b |_| c |_|
1 Please explain why these jobs will be created or safeguarded, and which type they will be. Please do not consider as employment potential the jobs related to the construction phase, or to the maintenance of the infrastructure
2 In case project may necessitate/initiate job generation in lateral/processing industries
3 Please explain in which way the infrastructure may improve the public services for solid waste collection/treatment/disposal to the enterprises in the affected area, or other significant benefits for the economy of the territory
4 In case of the project related to the RWMC, the area is municipality where the location of the RWMC is planned
5 When the Screening methodology for the identification and prioritization of potentially contaminated sites is adopted, this criteria will be replaced with the following:
The project is related to the following category of sites, according to the Screening methodology for the identification and prioritization of potentially contaminated sites: a.
Category C: potentially contaminated sites with urgent need for verification/action, because probability of contamination is high and potential hazard is medium to high; b.
Category B: relevant for classification as potentially contaminated sites, but as probability of contamination is medium and potential hazard, if is contaminated, is low so no urgent need for verification/action c.
Category A: not relevant for classification as potentially contaminated site, because probability of contamination is low and potential hazard, if is contaminated, is low.
4

4. BRIEF PROJECT EXPLANATION
Please describe project purpose, expected results, technical justification and the status of project development.
5