ENGLISH REVOLUTION 1625-1689 TOPIC Kings Violence Absolute monarchs James I: intelligent; slovenly habits; “wisest fool in Christendom”; didn’t make a good impression on his new subjects; introduced the Divine Right of Kings Charles I: Believed in Divine Right of Kings; unwilling to compromise with Parliament; narrow minded and aloof; lived an extravagant life; Wife Henrietta Maria and people despised her (Catholic) Charles II: supposed to rule as a constitutional monarch; tried to protect Catholic freedom James II: openly Catholic, believed in Divine Right of Kings; instituted reign of terror due to rebellions against him Charles invades the House of Commons and tried to arrest the leaders to regain power but failed. In the English civil war there were two sides; Charles side and parliaments’ side. Charles supporters were royalist and cavaliers that came from noble families that were used to fighting and riding. Parliament’s side were local militiafarmers and townspeople with no military experience. Charles side was successful at first but he could never gain a decisive victory. Parliament made a alliance with the scots who attacked from the north, and began a more modern army. The name of the new army was the new model army; it was led by Oliver Cromwell. Significance in history Passed the bill of rights which laid down limits for how much power the monarchy has. Also set up rights for parliament and freedom of speech in parliament. Created basic rights. Gave the option of electing members of parliament. FRENCH REVOLUTION Absolute monarchs Louis XIV: known as the “Sun King”; saw himself as centre of France and forced nobles to live with him; extravagant lifestyle; built Palace of Versailles ($$) Louis XV: great grandson of Louis XIV; only five years old when he became King; continued extravagances of the court and failure of government to reform led France towards disaster Louis XVI; originally wanted to be loved; not interested in governing; did not help middle and lower classes; married Marie Antoinette who people despised (Austrian) Louis allowed critics of government to be imprisoned or killed The tore down the bastille and freed 7 prisoners. Guillotined over 37000 people during the reign of terror The reign of terror was 1793-1794 During the reign of terror anyone who disagreed with the radical Jacobin’s was to be guillotined. More riots over the high price of bread broke out in Paris. A group of women marched down to Versailles to make the royal family come back to Paris. France was about to be invaded by European emigres who wanted to restore the Kings power. Declared war on Austria on April 20 1792 and won. French lost its first battles but won a victory in Valmy. The Paris mob; violent and unpredictable. Declaration of rights of man and citizen was passed by the National Assembly. Declaration of right of man and citizen states basic human rights that the government cannot overlook. This gave everyone the title of a citizen which meant everyone was equal. Government had less power. SIMILARTIES DIFFERENCES Kings ruled as Absolute Monarchs Raised foreign armies Charles I and Louis XVI both did not like working with Parliament/Estates General Citizens did not like the wives of Charles I (Catholic) and Louis XVI (from Austria) Both Charles I and Louis XVI punished critics of government English Kings believed in Divine Right of Kings and French did not Charles I did not care to be loved whereas Louis XVI initially wanted to be loved by his people Charles I did not kill people who were against him (he imprisoned or fined them) whereas Louis XVI did Charles I called Lord Strafford, Archbishop Laud and occasionally Parliament; Louis XVI only called Estates General as he had no advisors Both fought a bunch of wars. Both fought a civil war. Both gave basic human rights. Limited government/monarchies power. In France a lot of people were getting guillotined and in England not many people got guillotined. France had a bunch of riots while England had fought more battles. France gave everyone the title of citizen to make everyone equal England didn't. England set up rights for parliament and France didn't. Topic Parliament vs estate general Dictators Robespierre and cromwell English revolution Parliament, long parliament and rump parliament. Long parliament wanted to remove the power of the king. The king kept shutting down the parliament and only recalled parliament when he needed more money. Parliament and the king were always disagreeing. Rump parliament, was when many members of parliament Money issues French revolution Cromwell lead parliaments army to victory. He disliked the way that rump parliament was governing. Used the power he had to create laws that he believed that were important. He started to rule like Charles I did and he disliked the way Charles I ruled, so he thought of himself as a failure. Charles thought of different ways to get money from the people. He forced people to make loans to the crown. Mortgaged royal property Collected costume fees known as tunnage and poundage Also brought back a fee called ship money. Billeted his soldiers with homeowners Increased fees for government services Sold noble titles Charles took money without parliaments consent Everyone had to pay taxes. Similarities Estate general voted in blocs on social class; first estate (clergy), second estate (aristocrats) and third estate (middle class). First and second estate had double the power when it came to voting even though they third estate had twice as many delegates. Met only as a result of royal command They met very seldom. Louis XVI only called the estate general together when his government was in a serious crisis Robespierre led the revolution. He was responsible for the death of many lives. He made many changes in government He led the reign of terror. Third estate had to pay all the taxes. France was bankrupt because they helped America in their civil war. Taxes were way too high and people couldn’t even afford them. Bread was a month worth’s pay. The queen spent too much money on extravagant jewelry. The king spent too much money on parties. Differences The king was in control of when the parliament and estate general met. The king only called the parliament or estate general when they needed help. England’s rump parliament was made up of Presbyterians and puritans but France's estate general was made up of a representation from all of the social classes. Both made their own laws. Disliked the way the former government and current government ruled. Cromwell didn’t kill as many people as Robespierre did. Cromwell ran an army while Robespierre didn’t. The people of both countries had to pay extra taxes because of the monarch. The taxes were both very expensive. The Kings both wanted more money. The people had to pay unnecessary taxes. Both kings lead extravagant lifestyles. In England everyone had to pay taxes but in France only the third estate had to pay taxes. In France the king didn’t have to have parliaments consent to raise taxes so he wasn’t doing anything illegal when he was raising the taxes unlike England. France had a church tax called the tithes. I believe that the French Revolution helped the people more than the English revolution. Even though there were lot of negative that came with the French Revolution like all of the thousands of deaths from the reign of terror I think that the positive that came with the revolution evened it all out. There were big changes for the educational area because Robespierre established new institutions like colleges and schools. Also the people of the country got more respect and rights. The people of the third estate were benefited a lot from the French Revolution because it got rid of serfdom so people couldn't own them anymore and it got rid of the three estates so they were treated more equally. The people of France had received more freedom, equality and justice because of the revolution. They even influenced some other countries from their idea of “liberty, equality and fraternity”. People of other countries strove for that to free themselves from tyrants and to achieve freedom and justice like the French did. In all I think France started out as a country that was falling apart and worse than England but at the end it became a better country.