THE EFFEC OF TROPOSPHERIC OZONE ON HUMAN HEALTH Executive Summary for the MSc thesis of Rachel Harris CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON Academic Year 2009-2010 Supervisor: Professor Nigel Bell and Professor Paolo Vineis AIMS AND OBJECTIVES The overall aim was to investigate the health impact of tropospheric ozone. The main objectives were: To identify whether or not there is a causal link between ozone and respiratory diseases To assess the best method for investigating this link To establish those most at risk from ozone INTRODUCTION Over the past half a century there has been grave concern over anthropogenic activity disturbing the naturally occurring ozone of the atmosphere. This disruption has serious consequences for the environment and for human health. At high concentrations ozone is known to threaten human health. With climate change, an increased reliance on fossil fuels and a large scale shift to urban living, ozone poses an ever greater risk to human health. Recent studied into tropospheric ozone and respiratory illnesses have looked at hospital admission data and found contrasting evidence with regards to whether or not ozone is having a detrimental effect on the health of the population. There is much literature documenting a relationship between regional ozone concentrations and the number of emergency visits to hospitals for respiratory diseases. However these studies lack consistency with regards to their approach and analysis. To establish the seriousness of the threat that ozone may pose, it is essential to understand the best and most accurate approach to assessing the problem. Only then can firm conclusions on the effect of tropospheric ozone on public health be drawn. METHODOLOGY Early research indicated that a broad scope approach to analyze the existing literature would be suitable given the similarly broad array of published literature surrounding the issue of ozone and respiratory diseases. The project used a qualitative approach to examine the evidence, deduce theories and to acquire and insight. This study will use a scoring system to critically review the scientific evidence of published case studies. By scoring studied on the validity of their methodology it is possible to establish how strong the association between ozone and respiratory disease actually is. Through an extensive critical review those groups most vulnerable to the affects of ozone will be identified so they may be protected in the future. In addition the study will identify, via the critical review, the areas that require further investigations and how best to conduct such efforts. ANALYSIS To compare and summarise the literature Table 1. includes the four highest ranking studies of those critically reviewed. Scores have been allocated to various components of each study’s method of collecting the data that underpins their analysis and conclusions. This scoring system helps to assess the quality of studies and the reliability of the data included and therefore results. Anderson et al ranks the highest out of the nine studies analysed. The study faired particularly well for its thorough recording of other confounding pollutants such as PM and NO2, other non pollutant confounding factors such as weather and influenza epidemics. Anderson et al was the only study to independently include pollen counts in the analysis. Such a thorough inclusion of confounding factors means this study has come as close as possible to investigating the effects of ozone independently. However the association between ozone and other air pollutants is a complicated relationship and it is impossible to completely analyse ozone independently. Burnett et al and Ponce de Leon et al also scored highly (Burnett et al 2001; Ponce de Leon et al 1996). All of them concluded that there was an association between ozone levels and respiratory admissions. 4 Temperature, humidity, seasonal and other cyclical factors, day of the week, influenza epidemic, autocorrelation 4 4 Pollens not included based on Anderso n et al study 0 1 Respiratory complaints to A&E, reported by the patients not diagnosed by medical professionals Table 1. The four highest ranking papers that were critically reviewed. 3 0 Not mentioned 0 All hospitals in Toronto 1 Not mentioned 0 Coding area of residents unavailable for study 0 Multiple London hospitals 1 12 1 Not mentioned 0 Not mentioned 0 16 London hospitals 1 11 1 Not mentioned 1 Not mentioned 3 0-14 years, 15 -65 years, 65+ years 0 0-14 years, 15 -65 years, 65+ years Sampling Spread Score NO2, SO2, CO, PM10, BS 3 Not mention ed 0 Children less tha 2 only 0 Not mentioned Control disease Score Atkinson et al 1999 NO2, SO2 , BS Temperature, humidity, seasonal and other cyclical factors, day of the week, holidays, influenza epidemic, autocorrelation 3 Nor mention ed 3 0-14 years, 15 -65 years, 65+ years Score Ponce de Leon et al 1996 5 Temporal trends in admissions, temperature, humidity, admission biases 3 Emergency admssions of asthma to all London NHS hospitals, collected by Hospital Episode System, only visits that result in admission to hospital Data collected from the Ontario Ministary of Health for all hospitals in the area, only urgent or emergrncy admissions included, specifically only children below 2 years Emergency admissions to London hospitals for medical diagnosis, data sourced from Hospital Episode Systems, diagnosis used from 73%, 76%, 85%, 88%, and 95% of the 5 years of the study Age Groups Volunteer exposure location Score NO2, SO2, CO, PM2.5, PM10-2.5 4 Daily counts of burch, grass and oak pollen are included Respiratory disaese diagnosis Score Burnett et al 2001 4 Time trends, seasonal factors, calendar effects, influenza epidemics, temperature, humidity, auto correlation Pollen Score Anderson et al 1998 NO2, SO2, PM2.5, PM10-2.5 Other confounding factors Score Other pollutants Score Study 0 All NHS hospitals across London 1 16 1 13 Total Score DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Most of the studies found positive associations between ozone and respiratory diseases (Ponce de Leon et al 1996; Anderson et al 1998; Burnett et al 2001; Lin et al 2008). However some studies show contrasting evidence. It is difficult to know whether this could be due to a lack of consistency in the methodology, geographical location, the confounding factors included or other differences such as health care management, socio-demographics, family history or genetic susceptibility of the populations under study (Lin et al 2008). Some of the studies reviewed excluded other pollutants as confounding factors. Pollutants such as SO2 are well documented to affect the respiratory system. A few studies have even failed to consider temperature and humidity which makes it difficult to ascertain the association between weather and ozone on the results (Lin et al 2008). Generally there does seem to be an association between ozone and respiratory diseases, particularly in vulnerable individuals such as asthmatics. Areas identified to be neglected in the literature and where further research is recommended: - The interaction between pollen and ozone on respiratory diseases. - The effect of ozone specifically on those who have high exposure rates to ozone such as farmers and cyclists. - Ozone concentrations and respiratory disease in rural areas and developing countries. - The suitability of the statistical analysis used in the analysis of ozone and respiratory diseases. How this thesis could be improved: - Making the critical review quantitative through methods such as a meta-analysis would have increased the credibility of the critical review. REFERENCES Anderson, H.R., Ponce de Leon, A. & Bland, J.M. (1998). Air pollution, pollens, and daily admission for asthma in London 1987-92. Thorax. 53: 842-848. Burnett, R.T., Smith-Doiron, M., Stieb, D., Raizenne, M.E., Brook, J.R., Dales, R.E., Leech, J.A., Catmak. & Krewski, D. (2001). Association between ozone hospitalization for acute respiratory diseases in children less than 2 years of age. 135: 444-452. Lin, S., Bell, E.M., Liu, W., Walker, R.J., Kim, N.K. & Hwang, S.A. (2008). Ambient ozone concentration and hospital admissions due to childhood respiratory diseases in New York State, 1991-2001. Environmental Research. 108: 42-47. Ponce de Leon, A., Anderson, H.R., Bland, J.M., Strachan, D.P. & Bower, J. (1996). Effects of air pollution on daily hospital admission rates for respiratory disease in London between 1987088 and 1991-92. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 33(Suppl 1):S63-S70.