Orlando 1 Quantitative Analytical Chemistry Joseph Orlando Lab #8: Comparison Of Unknowns: Weak Acid Identification Purpose: The purpose of this experiment is to utilize two different methods; masking and ion exchange resin conversion, to determine several metal ion concentrations. The ions that we are measuring [H+], [Zn2+], [Mg2+], [Na+]. [H+] is measured by titration with standardized base. EDTA was used to measure [Zn2+] and [Mg2+]. Cation exchange resin was used to replace all metal cations with H+. My group Procedure: Standardization of NaOH 1. 4.0304 g NaOH were dissolved in 1L distilled water. 2. Approximately 0.511 g KHP was dissolved in 50 mL distilled water. A small amount of phenolphthalein indicator was added. Three samples were assembled like this. 3. The NaOH solution was standardized using titration method. [H+] Determination 4. [H+] of the unknown was determined by direct titration with the standardized base. 5 mL unknown was diluted to 100 mL. 20 mL aliquots of this unknown solution were titrated using a calibrated pH meter to determine equivalence point. [Na+] Determination 5. An amount (enough for three titrations) of the unknown was passed through the cation exchange resin to convert and replace all metal ions with [H+]. 6. Three 20 mL aliquots of the converted unknown were titrated using phenolphthalein indicator to determine equivalence point. 7. 0.3996 g CaCO3 was dissolved in 80 mL of 0.1 M HCl. Three 20 mL aliquots were taken out. Enough buffer was added to each sample to reach a pH of 10. [Zn2+] and [Mg2+] Determination 8. A 0.1 M EDTA solution was prepared by dissolving 14.3984 g EDTA in 500mL water. This was standardized using the CaCO3 solution. 9. 5 mL of unknown was combined with 7 mL of buffer in an Erlenmeyer flask. 2 mL calmagite indicator was added. Additional samples like this were prepared. 10. Each sample was titrated with the EDTA solution until a blue endpoint was noted. 11. 1.000 g of KCN was combined with 1 mL of unknown. Two samples were prepared. 12. Each sample was titrated with the EDTA solution. Orlando 2 Data: Standardization of NaOH Trial # Mass(g) KHP NaOH(mL) Titrated [NaOH] 1 0.0446 27.59 0.0227 2 0.0470 23.82 0.0246 3 0.0452 22.21 0.0286 Average 0.0456 24.54 0.0253 Titration of Unknown with NaOH Trial # mL of Unknown Used NaOH(mL) Titrated [H+] 1 20.00 - 0.000839 2 20.00 - 0.000879 3 20.00 - 0.000853 Average 20.00 - 0.000857 *Unable to collect NaOH(mL) Titrated data for Titration of Unknown with NaOH Titration of Converted Unknown with NaOH Trial # mL of Unknown Used NaOH(mL) Titrated [H+] 1 20.00 18.50 0.0185 2 20.00 17.50 0.0175 3 20.00 17.50 0.0175 Average 20.00 17.83 0.0178 Orlando 3 Standardization of EDTA Trial # mL of CaCO3 Used EDTA(mL) Titrated [EDTA] 1 5.00 6.90 0.02890 2 5.00 6.70 0.02979 3 5.00 7.30 0.02795 Average 5.00 6.96 0.02869 EDTA Titration of Unknown Trial # mL of Unknown Used EDTA(mL) Titrated 1 5.00 5.50 2 5.00 5.40 3 5.00 5.60 Average 5.00 5.50 [Zn2+] and [Mg2+] EDTA Titration of Unknown and KCN Trial # KCN(g) used 1.00 Unknown(mL) used 25.00 EDTA(mL) Titrated 4.25 1 2 1.00 25.00 4.05 3 1.00 25.00 4.29 Average 1.00 25.00 4.19 [Mg2+] Orlando 4 Ion Average Concentration H+ 4.3π − 5 π Mg2+ 0.0048 π Zn2+ 0.0268 π Na+ −0.0138π Equations: Amount of NaOH needed to make 0.1 M 0.1 π × 39.995 π ππππ» × 0.500 πΏ ≅ 2 π ππππ» 1 πππ ππππ» Amount of KHP needed for 25.0 mL Titration . 025 πΏ × 0.10 π ππππ» × 1 πππ πΎπ»π 204.23 π πΎπ»π × = 0.511 π πΎπ»π 1 πππ ππππ» 1 πππ πΎπ»π [NaOH] 0.0456g πΎπ»π × 1 πππ πΎπ»π 1 πππ ππππ» 1 × × = 0.0253 π ππππ» 204.23 π πΎπ»π 1 πππ πΎπ»π 0.02454 πΏ ππππ» πππππ [H+] (Titration) 0.01363 πΏ ππππ» × .0253 πππ ππππ» 1πΏ 1 πππ π»+ 1 × 1 πππ ππππ» × 0.020 πΏ ππππππ€π πππ. = π2 =0.000857 M *Considering dilution of unknown solution . . . π1 = (0.000857 π)(.005 πΏ) = 4.3π − 5 π . 100 πΏ [H+] in Cation Exchange 0.01783 L ππππ» × 0.0253 πππ ππππ» 1 πππ π» + 1 × × = 0.0178 π 1πΏ 1 πππ ππππ» 0.020 πΏ ππππππ€π ππππ’π‘πππ Orlando 5 Concentration of Cations ([Zn2+] + [Mg2+]) 0.00550 πΏ πΈπ·ππ΄ × 0.02869 π πΈπ·ππ΄ = 0.0316 π 0.005 πΏ ππππππ€π ππππ’π‘πππ [Mg2+] 0.02869 π πΈπ·ππ΄ × 0.00419 πΏ πΈπ·ππ΄ πππππ = 0.0048 π 0.025 πΏ ππππππ€π ππππ’π‘πππ [Zn2+] (0.0316 π) − (0.0048 π) = 0.0268 π [Na+] (0.0178π) − (4.3π − 5π) − (0.0048π) − (0.0268π) = −0.0138π Conclusion: The purpose of this lab was to demonstrate two types of techniques that are commonly used for selectivity in analytical chemistry. The two types of techniques that we focused on in this experiment were masking and ion exchange resin. Using these two different techniques we were able to calculate [H+], [Zn2+], [Mg2+], and {Na+]. The average calculated concentrations of these cations are listed above in the data section. The only discrepancy in the data was the calculated [Na+] value of -0.0138M. This may have been caused by human error in weighing samples or determining volume titrated. The lab was a group effort between all groups in the lab section which may have contributed to the amount of error. The calculated values seem reasonable although due to the high chance of error, the actual values are unknown.