disease suppression and possible mechanisms

advertisement
Plant and Soil
Jaiswal et al.
1
Supplementary Material
2
GC/MS analysis of aqueous biochar extracts
3
Aqueous extracts of the biochars were prepared by shaking 1 g biochar in 10 ml
4
deionized water (hereafter, water) in 15 ml polypropylene centrifuge tubes in the dark for
5
24 hours, followed by sedimentation and filtration of the liquid solution via membrane
6
filters of 0.22-µm pore size (Durapore PVDF membrane, Millipore Corp., Carrigtwohill,
7
Ireland). Aliquots (2 ml) of the extracts were lyophilized and the dried residue subjected
8
to a two-stage derivatization procedure immediately prior to analysis by GC/MS
9
following the methods detailed in Graber et al. (2014). The residue was first
10
methoxyamininated to stabilize carbonyl moieties, and then functional groups with active
11
hydrogens were silylized with N-methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA).
12
The derivatized extracts were analyzed by quadrupole GC/MS (Agilent Technologies,
13
Santa Clara, California, USA) using electron impact ionization. Separation was achieved
14
on a 30-m long, VF-5M, 0.25 µm film, capillary column (Varian Inc., Palo Alto,
15
California, USA). Total ion chromatograms (TIC) were analyzed with freely available
16
deconvolution software (Automated Mass Spectral Deconvolution and Identification
17
System; AMDIS) at a minimum match probability of 75% and retention indices based on
18
a series of alkanes. The deconvoluted mass spectra were compared with a specialty
19
library for plant, animal and microorganism metabolites (Golm Metabolite Database)
20
freely provided by the Max Planck Institute for Metabolic Plant Physiology (Golm,
21
Germany) and to the NIST08 mass spectral library. Results given in Table 5,
22
Supplementary Material.
1
Plant and Soil
Jaiswal et al.
23
Table 1 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine the effect of interaction between
24
pyrolysis temperature (HTT) and concentration of eucalyptus (EUC) and greenhouse
25
pepper plant wastes (GHW) biochar on disease caused by R. solani in bean.
Source
EUC
GHW
AUMPCa
Disease
AUMPCa Disease
(%×days)
severity (%)b (%×days) severity (%)b
Model
0.0028*
<0.0001*
<0.0001*
<0.0001*
R2
0.3047
0.4687
0.4047
0.4075
0.0870
0.2148
0.7078
0.1504
Concentration (C ) 0.0078*
<0.0001*
0.0015*
<0.0001*
T×C
0.0590
0.7327
0.2239
ANOVA
P-value
Temperature (T)
26
a
27
b
28
*
0.3666
Area under mortality progress curve
Values were normalized by an arcsine square root transformation before analysis.
Significant at α < 0.05
29
30
31
32
33
34
2
Plant and Soil
Jaiswal et al.
35
Table 2 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine the effect of interaction between
36
feedstocks and concentration of biochar on disease caused by R. solani in bean.
AUMPCa (%×days)
Disease severity (%)b
Model
0.0057*
0.0006*
R2
0.2566
0.3233
Feedstock (F)
0.8654
0.4740
Concentration (C )
0.0224*
0.0244*
F×C
0.0084*
0.0005*
Source
ANOVA
P-value
37
a
38
b
39
*
Area under mortality progress curve
Values were normalized by an arcsine square root transformation before analysis
Significant at α < 0.05
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
3
Plant and Soil
Jaiswal et al.
47
Table 3 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine the effect of interaction between R.
48
solani inoculation (inoculated and non-inoculated), pyrolysis temperature (HTT) and
49
concentration of eucalyptus (EUC) and greenhouse pepper plant wastes (GHW) biochar
50
on growth parameters of bean.
Source
EUC
GHW
Plant height
Shoot dry
Plant height
Shoot dry
(cm)
weight (g)
(cm)
weight (g)
Model
<0.0001*
<0.0001*
<0.0001*
<0.0001*
R2
0.7297
0.7999
0.7108
0.6757
<0.0001*
<0.0001*
<0.0001*
<0.0001*
Temperature (T )
0.0636
0.1025
0.0002*
0.0090*
Concentration (C )
0.5377
0.0362*
0.0049*
0.4418
I×T
0.2140
0.5891
0.0003*
0.0034*
I×C
0.0820
0.0239*
0.7185
0.0759
T×C
0.8353
0.9835
<0.0001*
<0.0001*
I×T×C
0.8892
0.3383
0.0139*
0.0864
ANOVA
P-value
Rhizoctonia inoculation
(I)
51
Significant at α < 0.05
*
52
53
4
Plant and Soil
Jaiswal et al.
54
Table 4 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine the effect of pyrolysis temperature
55
(HTT) and concentration of eucalyptus (EUC) biochar on growth parameters of bean
56
(non-inoculated).
57
Source
EUC
GHW
Plant height
Shoot dry
Plant height
Shoot dry
(cm)
weight (g)
(cm)
weight (g)
Model
<0.0001*
<0.0001*
<0.0001*
<0.0001*
R2
0.8055
0.7967
0.8095
0.7057
Temperature (T )
0.0111*
0.1570
<0.0001*
<0.0001*
Concentration (C )
0.0574
0.0117*
0.0068*
0.5742
T×C
0.8499
0.6069
<0.0001*
<0.0001*
ANOVA
P-value
58
Significant at α < 0.05
*
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
5
Plant and Soil
Jaiswal et al.
66
Table 5 Putative identifications by gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer (GC/MS) of
67
compounds in aqueous extracts of eucalyptus woodchips (EUC) biochars produced at
68
350◦C (EUC-350) and 600◦C (EUC-600) and greenhouse pepper plant waste (GHW)
69
biochars produced at 350◦C (GHW-350) and 600◦C (GHW-600).
Retention EUC-
EUC-
GHW-
GHW-
Compound
time
350
600
350
600
2-Hydroxypropanoic acid
18.379
Y
Y
Y
Lactic acid
18.396
Y
Y
Y
Hexanoic acid
19.297
Y
Hydroxyacetic acid (glycolic acid) (alpha-hydroxy acid)
19.542
Y
1,2-Butanediol
22.163
Y
3-Hydroxypropanoic acid
23.074
Y
Heptanoic acid
24.102
Y
Y
4-Hydroxybutanoic acid
26.660
Y
Y
Benzoic acid
26.920
Y
Y
Octanoic acid
27.598
Glycerol
27.898
Succinic acid
29.189
3-Methylbenzoic acid
29.333
2-Methylbutanedioic acid
29.516
Glyceric acid
29.654
2-Methylbenzoic acid
30.216
Y
Nonanoic acid
30.554
Y
Oxalic acid
31.522
Y
Glutaric acid
31.831
Y
Benzenepropanoic acid
32.120
Y
Sulfurous acid, 2-ethylhexyl isohexyl ester
33.982
Decanoic acid
33.208
Y
Salicylic acid
34.432
Y
1,4,5-Pentatriol
34.462
Pyroglutamic acid
34.765
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
6
Plant and Soil
Jaiswal et al.
2-Piperidinecarboxylic acid
34.825
Y
Erythronic acid
35.297
Y
Threonic acid
35.299
Y
4-Hydroxybenzoic acid
35.887
Y
3-hydroxybenzoic acid
37.344
Y
Methyl α-d-lyxofuranoside
38.043
Y
D-Altro-2-Heptulose (sedoheptulose)
38.307
Y
1,6-Anhydro-beta-d-glucose
38.520
Y
1,6-Anhydroglucose
38.986
Y
Cyperaquinone
39.205
4-Benzylimidazole-5-(1-propenoic acid), methyl ester
39.274
Y
Tetradecanoic acid
42.248
Y
Mannitol
43.613
Y
Silane, dimethyl(4-(2-phenylprop-2-yl)phenoxy)butoxy-
43.748
Hexadecanoic acid
46.035
Myo-Inositol
46.618
Octadecanoic acid
49.573
Trehalose
57.061
Melezitose
57.130
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
70
71
72
References
73
Graber ER, Tsechansky L, Lew B, Cohen E (2014) Reducing capacity of water extracts
74
of biochars and their solubilization of soil Mn and Fe. Eur J Soil Sci 65:162-172.
75
7
Download