EVS-04-23e
Action items
1.
Secretary will list up all the questions / comments to USA in the technical discussion
including their intention for the participation to the Task force groups at least those with
comments from USA.
2.
USA will clarify exactly when they can prepare the technical experimental data and the
timeline.
3.
Secretary will collect the HFCV related questions from all EVS members and forward it to
OICA by the middle of November. OICA will answer and prepare the justification and
background why we can include HFCV in EVS by the end of 2013.
Co-sponsors will confirm the contents and scope of HFCV GTR, and check if there are
overlap between HFCV and EVS GTR. Co-sponsor will comeback with their proposal to
solve it if there are any overlaps to the next EVS meeting.
4.
The EVS members‘ comments for the part A GTR, justification part, will be sent to
Secretary in written format by end of March, 2014.
5.
Chinese delegation with Bus/Truck OEM will prepare the research data to make proposal
whether we include buses / trucks in the scope of this GTR or not by next meeting.
For the scope of vehicle weight, co-sponsors will ask USA to agree that 4536kg to be read
as 4500kg (according to S.R1)
6.
UL is requested to confirm their agreement on the term of “rupture” explained by OICA by
next meeting. (secretary will ask UL)
7.
Secretary will check the consistency with the wording of the definitions with VPSD IWG’s by
next meeting.
8.
EVS IWG agreed to ask China to establish a task force group on the requirements and test
procedure of protection against water for the whole vehicle, participated by OICA, Japan,
and maybe USA.
9.
Chinese delegation will prepare and provide the text to the members prior to the next
meeting with justification for energy level may include the warning for the drivers.
10. Japan will come back to explain their general concept for warning system by the next
meeting.
11. 5.X5,5.X6, description will move to 4, general requirement part. For the boundary issue to be
discussed has been explained as vehicle related part, so that the paragraph to be re-written
by Co-sponsors by next meeting.
12. EVS IWG agreed to ask OICA/USA (TBD) to establish the task force group for Low electric
energy, 5.2.2.2., joined by China or other members are invited.
13. OICA and USA will have further discussion on physical protection 5.2.2.3. and conclude by
next meeting(TBC).
14. UL is requested to confirm their agreement on fire hazard 5.2.3.3. with further discussion
with OICA by next meeting. (secretary will ask UL)
1
15. EVS IWG agreed to ask OICA to establish the task force group to study further about
electrolyte leakage with the justification and maybe with test procedure joined by China,
and maybe USA.
16. EVS IWG agreed to ask OICA to establish the task force group to review and address the
outstanding questions and comments for the requirements and test procedure for Vibration,
Thermal Shock and Cycling, Mechanical Impact, Mechanical shock, Mechanical integrity,
and External short circuit protection joined by Japan, EU, China, and maybe USA. .
17. Japan will propose texts with justification for three items 5.X12, 5.X13, 5.X14 with support
from OICA by next meeting.
18. REESS safety post-crash requirements in chapter 5.4 will be re-organized accordingly with
outline table order by secretary and distribute to the members by the end of 2013.
19. EVS IWG agreed to ask China to establish the task force group to study and discuss
further, and will come back with justification and test protocol for the cell/module/system
level requirement including thermal propagation joined by Japan, Korea, OICA, and maybe
USA.
20. EVS IWG agreed to ask Japan to establish the task force group to study and discuss SOC
issue including the definition of “normal operating SOC range” joined by China, EU,
Germany, OICA, and maybe USA.
21. EVS IWG agreed to ask Korea to establish the task force group to study and discuss fire
resistance test procedure of REESS 7.2.6.3.2 joined by China, Japan, OICA, and maybe
USA.
22. All the task force groups’ leaders are requested to report their proposal and timeline to
solve the issue by four weeks prior to the next meeting. Co-sponsors will establish the web
conference to review the progress of each task force group around January 2014.
23. Co-sponsor will prepare the status report of EVS IWG to the November WP29 and
December GRSP to get their feedback, especially for the roadmap.
**************************************
2