Supplementary Table caption
Supplementary Table1: Geographic locations within the study area.
Supplementary Figure caption
S1:Cartoon block diagrams needed to estimate the slip vector for a sub-vertical Y-plane with (a)
a sub-vertical P-plane and (b) a dipping P-plane.
S2: Stereo plots (lower hemisphere, equal area projections) of all fault planes and slip vectors
(black dots with arrow on the corresponding fault planes) with resolved stress tensors, for all 19
field locations. The red and blue dots indicate P-axes and T-axes for individual fault planes. The
white squares are the calculated strain axes orientations using the Right Dihedra Method (RDM)
(smallest square for the minimum strain axis and largest one for the maximum strain axis). The
yellow circles are the resolves stress axes orientations using the Visualisation of the Gauss
Function (VGF) method (smallest circle for the minimum stress axis and largest one for the
maximum stress axis). For locations with two stereo plots, the one with no stress calculations are
the plots of the “problematic faults” (Zalohar 2009; see also section 5.2 for details) (labeled PF,
for misfit angle α = 30°) for the resolved tensor, separated automatically during the cluster
analysis. At Chirner, the separated phase has more faults than the first phase and hence was
resolved again. Thus three stereo plots (P1: Phase 1; P2: Phase 2; PF: Problematic faults). On the
upper right of the plots, are the Formations for the locations; B: Borivali Formation; UR: Upper
Ratangarh Formation; E: Elephanta Formation; K: Karla Formation; D: Diveghat Formation; LR:
Lower Ratangarh Formation. In red: younger and in blue: older Formations.n: number of faults
used for the inversion; SHmin: azimuth of maximum horizontal extension. The problematic faults
are mostly the vertical dip-slip ones. However, a single dip-slip fault favored the inversion (e.g.
see Varcha).