KENYA
Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan
2013
Women, children and donkeys on the arid plains at
the feet of the Mogila mountains in Turkana, northern
Kenya. © Gwenn Dubourthoumieu, IRIN, July 2011
Participants in 2013 Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan
A Action Against Hunger, Agency for Technical Cooperation and Development C Caritas Switzerland, Centre for Human Rights and
Governance, Centre for the Poor International, Christian Aid, Concern Worldwide, Cooperazione Internazionale - COOPI D
Danchurchaid, Deutsche Welthungerhilfe e.V. (German Agro Action), Development Initiatives Access Link F Finnchurchaid, Food &
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Food for the Hungry G GOAL H HelpAge International I International Labour
Organization, International Medical Corps, International Organization for Migration, International Rescue Committee, International
Strategy for Disaster Reduction, Africa, Islamic Relief Worldwide
K
Kenyan Red Cross Society
L
Lay Volunteers International
M Medical Emergency Relief International, Mercy USA for Aid and Development, Mubarak for Relief and Development
Organization N Northern Kenya Caucus, Norwegian Refugee Council O Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Okoa
Mtoto Initiative Kenya P Pastoralists Against Hunger, Plan International R RedR UK, Refugee Consortium of Kenya S Samaritan's
Purse, Save the Children, Southern Aid T Terre Des Hommes U United Nations Children's Fund, United Nations Dept of Safety and
Association
Security, United Nations Development Fund for Women, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organization, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, United Nations Population Fund
sans Frontières (Germany)
V Vétérinaires
W World Cares Association, World Concern Development Organisation, World Food Programme, World
Health Organization, World Vision International, World Vision Kenya
Please note that appeals are revised regularly. The latest version of this document is available on
http://unocha.org/cap/. Full project details, continually updated, can be viewed, downloaded and printed from
http://fts.unocha.org.
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.
SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 1
HUMANITARIAN DASHBOARD................................................................................................... 3
Table I:
2013 Requirements per sector ................................................................................... 5
Table II:
2013 Requirements per priority level ......................................................................... 5
Table III: 2013 Requirements per organization ......................................................................... 6
2. 2012 IN REVIEW ....................................................................................................................... 8
Achievement of 2012 strategic objectives and lessons learned .................................................. 8
Review of humanitarian funding ................................................................................................. 25
3. NEEDS ANALYSIS.................................................................................................................. 27
Scope of the crisis and number of people in need ..................................................................... 33
4. THE 2013 COMMON HUMANITARIAN ACTION PLAN ........................................................ 34
Planning scenario ....................................................................................................................... 34
The humanitarian strategy and strategic objectives ................................................................... 36
Strategic objectives and indicators for 2013 ........................................................................... 38
Criteria for selection and prioritization of projects ...................................................................... 46
Sector response plans ................................................................................................................ 47
Agriculture and Livestock ........................................................................................................ 47
Coordination ............................................................................................................................ 53
Education ................................................................................................................................. 58
Food Assistance ...................................................................................................................... 62
Health ...................................................................................................................................... 66
Multi-Sector for Refugees........................................................................................................ 72
Nutrition ................................................................................................................................... 78
Protection................................................................................................................................. 84
Shelter and Non-Food Items ................................................................................................... 93
Water, Sanitation and Hygiene.............................................................................................. 100
Roles, responsibilities and linkages .......................................................................................... 105
Cross-cutting issues.................................................................................................................. 106
ANNEX I:
3W KENYA MAPS ................................................................................................. 108
ANNEX II:
LIST OF PROJECTS ............................................................................................. 115
Table IV: List of Projects (grouped by sector) ....................................................................... 115
Table V: Requirements per gender marker score ................................................................ 121
ANNEX III: NEEDS ASSESSMENT REFERENCE LIST ........................................................ 122
ANNEX IV: DONOR RESPONSE TO THE 2012 APPEAL ..................................................... 125
Table VI: Requirements and funding per sector .................................................................... 125
Table VII: Requirements and funding per priority level .......................................................... 126
Table VIII: Requirements and funding per organisation .......................................................... 126
Table IX: Total funding per donor to projects listed in the Appeal ........................................ 129
Table X: Non-Appeal funding per IASC standard sector...................................................... 131
Table XI: Total humanitarian funding per donor (Appeal plus other) .................................... 132
ANNEX V:
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................... 134
iv
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
v
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
1. SUMMARY
Kenya continues to experience humanitarian 2013 Kenya EHRP: Key parameters
Planning and
January – December 2013
emergencies linked to natural disasters such
budgeting horizon
as drought and floods, ethno-political and
resource-based conflicts, and outbreaks of
Key milestones in
January-February:
2013
human and livestock diseases. However, the
pre-election period
4 March: general elections
2011 short-rains and 2012 long-rains
March-May: long-rains
seasons brought relief to protracted drought
season
conditions. This reduced the number of
October-December:
food-insecure people from 3.75 million at the
Short-rains season
beginning of the year to 2.1 million as of
Target beneficiaries
1,981,000 targeted
October. It is expected that the current
food-insecure population
short-rains season will further improve food673,788 targeted refugees
security conditions and reduce the foodTotal: 2,654,788
insecure population.
Nutrition surveys
Total funding
US$743 million
carried out in Arid and Semi-Arid Land
requested
(ASAL) areas in 2012 also reflect this
improvement, showing significantly reduced
Funding requested
$280
per beneficiary
malnutrition levels in some ASAL counties
(Turkana, Mandera, Moyale and Kajiado).
The expected caseload of children under age 5 suffering from acute malnutrition has declined
from 385,000 in January 2012 to 300,000 as of October 2012. However, the situation in Wajir
County and Mandera East has not improved; these counties account for 75,644 (25%) of
expected caseloads.
As the March 2013 elections draw near, the risk of increased inter-communal violence is a key
concern. In 2012, more than 80,000 people have been displaced to date by inter-communal
violence including in Moyale, Tana Delta, Isiolo, Mandera and Wajir. In addition, attacks on
schools have become an emerging issue, confirmed in an assessment by the Ministry of
Education through the Education Sector and in the findings of the district steering group in Isiolo.
Between November 2011 and October 2012, varied incidents of violence in Isiolo, Moyale and
Tana delta districts disrupted learning in schools, affecting at least 6,000 pupils and displacing
communities.
The situation in Somalia and South Sudan continues to influence the refugee dynamics across
the borders into Kenya where 673,788 refugees are hosted in the Dadaab and Kakuma refugee
camps and in Nairobi. The Kenya military offensive into Somalia began over a year ago and has
now been incorporated into the AMISOM mission to pursue Al-Shabaab militants. This military
operation has caused ongoing insecurity in north-eastern Kenya with numerous improvisedexplosive-device and grenade attacks, including in and around Dadaab. It has also hampered
humanitarian access.
Despite these challenges, Kenya is making impressive progress towards consolidating the gains
of humanitarian investment and creating an enabling environment to link emergency assistance
to longer-term development programming. Through its Vision 2030 Policy, the Government
continues to lay the foundations for longer-term recovery and development by strengthening its
1
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
key structures and institutional capacity. This is providing a critical opportunity for humanitarian
and development partners to participate in this process and help shape strategic planning. In
addition, the formation of the county structures in line with Kenya’s new constitution is giving
impetus to coordinated engagement at the sub-national level. Partners are also making
sustained efforts to align with other national policies and initiatives such as the Ending Drought
Emergencies campaign, the newly passed IDP bill and policy, and the draft disaster risk
management policy. The 2011-2013 Kenya Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan and multiyear strategy has also provided the opportunity and mechanism for stakeholders to not only plan
responses to immediate acute needs, but also integrate resilience in humanitarian programming.
This has helped build national and local capacity for emergency preparedness and response.
2013 marks the end of the multi-year strategy and the transition to longer-term programming
through the engagement of development frameworks.
The 2013 Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan comprises 116 projects from more than 50
organizations. It requests US$743 million for humanitarian action.1
1
All dollar signs in this document denote United States dollars. Funding for this appeal should be reported to the
Financial Tracking Service (FTS, fts@un.org), which will display its requirements and funding on the current appeals
page.
2
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
HUMANITARIAN DASHBOARD
Crisis Description
Strategic Objectives
Drivers of the crisis:
1.
The humanitarian needs of highly vulnerable people
affected by natural and man-made disasters are met
through life-saving assistance.
2.
Communities have enhanced resilience, reducing the
impact of disasters, and lessened chronic vulnerability by
means of DRR and early-recovery approaches.
3.
Increased commitment on the part of the Government of
Kenya and development actors to address issues of
chronic vulnerability and provide durable solutions.
 Conflict and insecurity: inter-communal
ethnic tensions, political violence, pending
resettlement of internally displaced
populations, competition for scarce
resources and Kenya’s military intervention
in Somalia
 Food Security: Pastoral and marginal
agricultural communities in ASALs are
almost completely dependent on rains to
sustain their livelihoods and are therefore
vulnerable to erratic rains and drought.
Food-security improvements could be
underminded by persistently above-average
maize prices, flooding during the short-rains
season, and water-borne and vector-borne
livestock diseases that can accompany
above-average rains.
 Refugees: Conflict and food insecurity in
Somalia continue to bring in new refugees in
Kenya.
Needs Profile:
 Conflict and Insecurity: For planning
purposes, the figure of 100,000- 150,000
potential caseload of affected peoplehas
been proposed for election preparedness.
People in need and targeted
OVERALL CASELOAD
2.8 million
2.7 million
96%
affected
people
targeted by humanitarian
partners
of affected people
targeted
Source: UNHCR, WFP
DISPLACEMENT
 Food Security: the food-insecure population
is estimated at 2.1 million people.
673,788
463,788
145,000
Refugees
refugees in Dadaab
refugees in Kakuma
Baseline
Source: UNHCR
2.1 million
300,000
50,000
food-insecure people
GAM cases
(in ASAL and marginal
areas)
SAM cases
(in ASAL and marginal
areas)
Population
(World Bank, 2011)
GNI per capita
(World Bank, 2011, $.
Atlas method)
41.6
million
$820
Percentage of population
19.7%
living on less than $1.25
per day
(World Bank, 2011)
Life expectancy
57 years
(World Bank, 2011)
Under-five mortality per
72.8
1,000 live births
(World Bank, 2011)
Mortality rate adult male
379
per 1,000* (World Bank,
2011)
Mortality rate adult female*
358
(World Bank, 2011)
Percentage of population
52%
with access to an improved
drinking water source
(World Bank, 2010)
Human Development Index
143
2011
* the probability of dying between the ages of 15
and 60
FOOD SECURITY
Source: WFP, UNICEF
Funding
2013 REQUIREMENTS: $743 million
2012 REQUIREMENTS: $796 million
Funded
73%
Unmet
3
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
KENYA
2013 Planning figures
Number of people affected and targeted by end of 2013
In need
(in thousands)
Funding requirements
(in million US$)
Targeted end year
Agriculture and
Livestock
4,590
1,836
3,620
Health
15.6
2,882
2,250
WASH
29.3
2,250
2,100
Food Assistance
136.0
1,980
Nutrition
2,077
2,500
50.7
724
Multi-sector
433.3
724
Shelter and NFI
410
Education
375
Protection
370
370
14.9
710
4.0
595
10.2
Results achieved in 2012
Number of people affected, targeted and reached during 2012
Affected
Targeted
(in thousands)
% funded
Reached
7,500
7,500
Health
64%
5,000
4,600
Agriculture and
Livestock
25%
2,275
1,035
3,750
3,750
Food Aid
3,750
2,548
WASH
10%
1,580
1,962
50%
475
Nutrition
92
1,087
70%
735
680
Multi-Sector
49%
508
508
Education
Protection
95%
2,800
141
0
0
0
18%
4
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Table I:
2013 Requirements per sector
Kenya Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan 2013
as of 15 November 2012
Requirements
($)
Sector
AGRICULTURE AND LIVESTOCK
25,920,776
COORDINATION
4,032,356
EARLY RECOVERY
19,283,395
EDUCATION
4,150,267
FOOD ASSISTANCE
136,120,596
HEALTH
15,625,091
MULTI-SECTOR ASSISTANCE TO REFUGEES
433,301,840
NUTRITION
50,710,861
PROTECTION
10,233,095
SHELTER AND NON-FOOD ITEMS
14,899,486
WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE
29,268,216
Grand Total
743,545,979
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by appealing organizations.
Table II: 2013 Requirements per priority level
Kenya Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan 2013
as of 15 November 2012
Requirements
($)
Priority
HIGH
719,583,698
MEDIUM
23,962,281
Grand Total
743,545,979
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by appealing organizations.
5
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Table III: 2013 Requirements per organization
Kenya Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan 2013
as of 15 November 2012
Requirements
($)
Appealing Organization
ACF
3,585,175
ACTED
8,653,642
Caritas Switzerland
2,329,229
Chr. Aid
1,808,300
CHRiG
355,000
COOPI
3,432,401
CPI
298,132
CW
727,751
DanChurchAid/DCA
500,000
DIAL
1,399,960
DWHH
807,981
FAO
12,096,000
FH
850,000
Finnchurchaid
331,700
GOAL
947,220
HelpAge International
668,475
ILO
12,840,000
IMC
2,094,149
IOM
35,183,776
IRC
2,000,000
IRW
799,611
Kenya RC
6,185,749
LVIA
390,250
MERCY - USA
4,832,089
MERLIN
2,460,662
MURDO
365,596
NORKENYA
1,020,758
NRC
3,209,855
OCHA
1,916,326
OMIK
185,535
PAH
161,834
6
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Requirements
($)
Appealing Organization
Plan
413,228
RCK
285,000
RedR UK
315,150
Samaritan's Purse
3,148,168
SC
351,200
Southern Aid
754,000
Terre des Hommes
5,498,000
UNDP
2,181,017
UNDSS
800,880
UNESCO
2,887,500
UNFPA
1,350,000
UNHCR
251,587,153
UNICEF
39,860,035
UNIFEM
1,533,667
UNISDR AFRICA
1,000,000
VSF (Germany)
650,000
WCA
328,245
WCDO
2,598,275
WFP
300,470,667
WHO
9,571,190
WVI
725,297
WVK
4,800,151
Grand Total:
743,545,979
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by appealing organizations.
7
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
2. 2012 IN REVIEW
Achievement of 2012 strategic objectives and lessons learned
Strategic objective #1
The humanitarian needs of highly vulnerable people affected by natural and man-made disasters
are met through life-saving assistance and protection as per national and international standards.
Indicators
FOOD


% of targeted men,
women, boys and girls
receiving timely
distributions (GFD).
Adequate food
consumption score
(FCS) for 80% of GFD
beneficiaries; % of
women, boys and girls
receiving timely
distributions (blanket
supplementary feeding
programme / BSFP).
Targets



Monthly and timely relief
distributions of food or cash to
2.67 million drought-affected
targeted beneficiaries
between the months of
August 2011 and February
2012 (100%).
80% of GFD beneficiaries
have adequate FCS.
Monthly distributions of
fortified foods to 623,000
children under five and
pregnant or lactating women
(PLW) between August 2011
and March 2012 (100%).
NUTRITION

Under-five mortality
rate in highly
vulnerable disasteraffected districts.

Percentage of admitted
moderately
malnourished PLW and
children under five
receiving treatment
rations.
Baseline rates:

Turkana NE – 2.12%

Turkana South – 1.14%

Turkana NW – 3.24%

Turkana Central – 0.40%

Mandera West – 0.82%

Mandera Central – 0.83%

Mandera East/North – 0.83%

Wajir West/North – 1.15%

Wajir East – 0.17%

Marsabit (small-scale) – 0.0%

Marsabit -0.22%

Wajir South – 0.2%

Monthly distributions for the
treatment of moderate acute
malnutrition through provision
of fortified foods up to
100,000 admitted children
under five and PLW.
8
Sector achievements as of Oct. 2012

83% of food distributed
through general food
distribution (GFD) and foodfor-assets (FFA). On average
84% of the 2.2 million
beneficiaries targeted were
reached by July 2012.
















Turkana North – 1.18%
Turkana South – 0.98%
Turkana West – 1.18%
Turkana Central – 1.27%
Mandera West – 0.67%
Mandera Central – 0.22%
Mandera East/North – 0.8%
Wajir West/North – 1.0%
Wajir East
West Pokot – 0.58%
Mwingi – 1.95%
Meru North
Isiolo – 0.62%
Kitui – 1.07%
Kwale – 0.45%
Laikipia – 0.40%
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Indicators


Targets
Percentage of children
under five with GAM in
highly vulnerable
disaster-affected
districts.
Baseline rates:

Turkana NE – 37.4%

Turkana South – 33.5%

Turkana NW – 27.8%

Turkana Central – 24.4%

Mandera West – 32.6%

Mandera Central – 27.5%

Mandera East/North – 26.9%

Wajir West/North - 27.9%

Wajir East – 22.8%’

Marsabit (small-scale) –
22.7%

Marsabit – 27.1%

Wajir South – 28.5%

Garbatulla (small-scale) –
21.6%
Percentage of children
under five with severe
acute malnutrition
(SAM) in highly
vulnerable disasteraffected districts.
Baseline rates:

Turkana NE – 9.40%

Turkana South – 6.80%

Turkana NW – 6.00%

Turkana Central – 4.5%

Mandera West – 8.50%

Mandera Central – 3.40%

Mandera East/North – 5.60%

Wajir West/North – 6.80%

Wajir East – 4.3%

Marsabit (small-scale) –
4.00%

Marsabit – 5.0%

Wajir South – 4.5%

Garbatulla (small-scale) –
4.3%
EDUCATION

Increase access to quality
education for all school-age
boys and girls in emergencyprone areas.
Refugee response: Food
Assistance and Nutrition

All refugees receive
adequate and appropriate
food to meet the minimum
nutritional requirements and
with nutrition services

Sector achievements as of Oct. 2012












Turkana North – 15.3%
Turkana South – 17.1%
Turkana West – 14.3%
Turkana Central – 11.6%
Mandera West – 16.2%
Mandera Central – 17.9%
Mandera East/North – 15.9%
Wajir West/North - 14.6%
West Pokot – 12.3%
Marsabit – 13.4%
Wajir South – 23.1%
Garbatulla (surveillance) –
14.5%

Moyale – 7.4%

Mwingi – 2.8%

Meru North – 7.8%

Isiolo – 11%

Kitui -4.7%

Kwale – 9.1%

Laikipia – 12.8%
(nutrition surveys from January to
October 2012)












Turkana North – 2.3%
Turkana South – 4.2%
Turkana West – 2.1%
Turkana Central – 0.7%
Mandera West – 3.5%
Mandera Central – 3.4%
Mandera East/North – 2.2%
Wajir West/North – 2.3%
West Pokot – 12.3%
Marsabit – 2.7%
Wajir South – 4.6%
Garbatulla surveillance –
2.3%

Moyale – 1.4%

Mwingi – 3.4%

Meru North – 1.2%

Isiolo – 11%

Kajiado – 0.6%

Kitui – 1.1%

Kwale – 2.7%

Laikipia – 2.3%
(nutrition surveys from January to
October 2012)
399,412 pupils

1,132,305 *This number
includes 826,599 pupils in
feeding programmes of WFP.
All refugees

100% of refugees received
2100 kcal per person per day.
100% of children under five
and expectant and nursing
mothers received fortified food.
Prevalence of acute
malnutrition amongst children


9
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Indicators
Targets
including integrated
management of acute
malnutrition (IMAM) to
address and reduce
morbidity and mortality
rates.
Sector achievements as of Oct. 2012


under five: 7%.
Crude mortality rate:
0.2/1,000/month.
Crude mortality rate of children
under five: 0.6/1,000/month.
Refugee response: WASH

All refugees have
access to safe,
adequate, portable and
clean water, and
adequate and secure
sanitation facilities; all
refugees practice best
hygiene practices.

All refugees



100% refugees in camps
have access to adequate.
water and sanitation services
with 17-20 litres per person
per day, one communal
latrine per 20 people.
Only 30% of refugees have
access to family latrines
100% of refugees received
250gr soap per
person/month.
30% of women received
sanitary materials.
Refugee response: Health


All refugees have
access to basic health
care
Refugees’ mental wellbeing is strengthened
through psycho-social
assistance and
counselling.

All refugees


100% of refugees have access
to primary health care services.
100% of refugees have access
to secondary and tertiary
health care services.
The crude mortality rate is
0.2/1000/ month; infant
mortality rate is 0.5 deaths per
1,000 live births; and neonatal
mortality rate is 4.8 per 1,000
live births.
Refugee response: Protection




All refugees are legally
protected in
accordance with
Kenyan and
international standards,
laws and jurisprudence.
New arrivals are
received according to
established protection
procedures and
standards.
Refugee children,
women and other
vulnerable people are
protected from sexual
and gender-based
violence (SGBV).
All refugees vulnerable
to human trafficking are
protected.


All refugees




10
Zero refoulement
98% of refugees registered
with minimum set of data
All refugees and asylum
seekers registered individually.
100% of known SGBV
survivors received adequate
support including legal
assistance, clinical care,
psycho-social and material
support.
100% of refugees have access
to individual documentation.
450 best interest
determinations for
unaccompanied minors carried
out.
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Indicators
Targets
Sector achievements as of Oct. 2012
Refugee response: Education


All refugees of schoolgoing age have access
to quality basic
education.
Out-of-school refugee
children have access to
alternative education
programmes.
Refugee response: Shelter
and NFI



All refugees


All refugees
All refugees have
adequate, appropriate
and secure shelter
All refugee households
are provided with a
shelter kit.


64% of school age children
have access to quality basic
education.
Only some 5% out-of-school
youth enrolled in vocational
training.
30% of refugees have
adequate shelters.
100% of new arrivals provided
with emergency shelters.
5,000 shelter units distributed/
constructed.
Refugee response: Camp
management

Refugee camps are
organized in a
systematic, wellstructured and wellcoordinated manner for
increased access,
safety and efficiency.

All camps

Refugee response:
Environmental protection and
livelihoods support


Natural resources and
shared environment
protected.
Level of self-reliance
and livelihoods
improved.
Environmental protection
strategy developed and
implemented



Refugee response: Durable
solutions

10,000 refugees resettled
At least 10,000
refugees are resettled
in designated
resettlement countries.


11
50% women participation in
camp leadership/management
structures in all camps.
90% of camp coordination
mechanisms working
effectively.
4.125 km² of green belts
(natural regeneration of trees)
maintained. Over 200,000 tree
seedlings have been planted in
the refugee settlement sites
and in host communities’
areas.
3% of the refugee population
aged between 18-59 years
engaged in livelihoods
activities.
2.5% of the population
benefited from agencies’
livelihoods intervention in
camps.
1,542 refugees have been
resettled.
5,721 cases submitted to
recipient countries for
resettlement.
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Progress towards objective 1 and challenges:
Coordination
Progress has been noted in a number of key areas. As a result of findings of the Real-Time
Evaluation and other lessons-learned activities, the priority areas for strengthening coordination in
2012 included improved support to and links with coordination structures at sub-national level;
better integration of cross-cutting issues; and establishment of a multi-sector needs-assessment
framework for response to sudden-onset emergencies. At sub-national level, support to sectorspecific coordination and inter-sector coordination has progressed. This has included a number
of consultations and follow-up activities to identify and address areas for development, issue
specific trainings (gender and HIV/AIDS), and more frequent and systematic interaction between
national and sub-national structures. Additional opportunities for further strengthening are also
presented through the establishment of the county structures. In the area of integration of crosscutting issues, the formation of an inter-sector working group has contributed to support the
sectors and the inter-agency preparedness and response planning by providing technical
guidance in a number of key cross-cutting areas. This included support to trainings, support to
the Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan (EHRP) process and sector-specific briefings and
orientations.
In 2012, partners have also worked together to develop a multi-sector rapid-assessment tool for
use in sudden-onset emergencies. The initial phase of the process is closely linked with
contingency planning for elections in order to facilitate a common approach to initial assessments
around agreed information parameters. However, it is expected that following the initial phase
the tool will be adapted for use in a variety of sudden-onset situations.
Food Assistance
For the drought operation, WFP’s food distributions in January improved substantially, with 83%
of food distributed through GFD and FFA. On average, 84% of the 2.2 million beneficiaries
targeted were reached by July 2012. 61% of 43,800 severely malnourished people and 41% of
the 136,360 moderately malnourished children under age 5 five received treatment (January-July
2012). Within the first half of the year, the Food Assistance Working Group was activated to
improve the coordination of emergency and recovery in-kind and cash food-assistance activities,
targeting people in need in ASAL regions of Kenya.
69% of the target population (1.3 million people) have accessed at least 7.5 litres of water per
person per day, while 247,606 (16%) of the target population were reached with hygienepromotion interventions.
Nutrition
Involvement of the Ministry of Public Health & Sanitation (MOPHS) and Ministry of Medical
Services (MOMS) in high-impact nutrition interventions (HINI) implementation (national and
provincial sensitization meetings in the pilot districts of Isiolo, Samburu and Marsabit and
subsequent sensitization and roll-out to all ASALs districts have contributed to an increased
number of health facilities offering a full package of HINI services. This enabled greater access
of services by beneficiaries. There has been a significant reduction in global acute malnutrition
(GAM) and severe acute malnutrition (SAM) levels during the year, with major improvements in
some areas in selected ASALs (Turkana, Mandera, Moyale and Kajiado) mainly attributed to the
access of the HINI coupled with favourable food-security status and provision of food and nonfood services. The acute malnutrition performance indicators were above the SPHERE
12
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
standards. Some of the challenges noted include cultural practices hindering the uptake of health
and nutrition services, health workers’ low motivation to provide nutrition services and a heavy
workload that constrains provision of quality services. Ineffective distribution systems and lack of
tracking systems for micronutrient commodities lead to frequent pipeline breaks, especially for the
iron folate supply.
WASH
A total of 1,580,826 people (81% of the target population) had access to at least 7.5 litres of
water per person per day, while 1,270,238 people (66% of the target population) were reached
with hygiene and sanitation interventions. The main challenge of monitoring progress towards
this objective was actors’ poor reporting, particularly those funded outside of the EHRP 2012.
Health
Progress noted under this sector includes the establishment of health and nutrition coordination
platforms at national level and in eight districts supported by WHO technical staff. The national
health sector multi-partner drought response plan was also developed and WHO deployed
technical staff for support to MoH and partners in Garissa, Marsabit and Turkana. A reorientation was conducted for 52 district health teams to establish early warning and response
networks and for the health partners in the two refugee camps.
Multi-sector for Refugees
Security developments in Somalia have evolved dramatically since 2011. This has affected
Kenya’s policy on Somalia and on hosting Somali refugees. Heightened security concerns in
Kenya led to the country’s military intervention in Somali territory in 2011. Current hopes for a
continued growth of stability in Somalia have led to expectations of early voluntary repatriation by
Somali refugees.
The outcome of this collaborative process is embodied in an Operations Continuity Plan, which is
a practical guide on how to provide coordinated and uninterrupted protection and services in the
insecure environment of the Dadaab refugee complex. The Operations Continuity Plan relies
greatly on the use of refugee capacity, nationals and local partners to deliver assistance.
While the Dadaab complex registered more than 5,700 new arrivals from Somalia, bringing the
total population in these camps to some 463,788, the biggest jump in population growth occurred
in Kakuma Camp in Turkana County, where 14,000 new arrivals, mostly from South Sudan, were
registered between January and September 2012. With a population exceeding 145,000,
Kakuma is rapidly running out of space. There has been a deepening strain on limited essential
services and infrastructure capacity due to the rapid growth in refugees, resulting in risks to public
health and the safety and welfare of refugees and host communities. Some of the challenges
include insecurity where, during the recent past, the security situation in the Dadaab area moved
from low-risk and stable to high-risk and dangerous following incidents including the abduction of
aid workers and fatal attacks on refugee leaders and Kenyan security forces. This led to more
restrictive security measures that curtailed humanitarian access to the camps and obliged the
Government of Kenya, UNHCR, partners and the refugee leadership to explore new ways to
continue delivering assistance and protection. Dwindling public support and sympathy for people
of concern is another issue facing the refugee operation in Kenya. There is a perception that
refugees pose a threat to Kenya’s national security and internal stability, and that they represent
a financial and environmental burden.
13
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Strategic objective #2
Communities have enhanced resilience, reducing the impact of disasters, and lessened chronic
vulnerability by means of disaster risk reduction (DRR) and early-recovery approaches.
Indicators





Targets
Achieved as of October 2012

60% of humanitarian
response projects
incorporate early
recovery and disaster
risk reduction
components

80% of funded projects
incorporate early recovery and
disaster risk reduction
components.
People and
communities become
resilient to the worst
impact of crises by
means of early
resumption of
livelihoods of people
affected by crises,
and/or strengthened
ability to maintain
their livelihoods
through crises to
mitigate its impact,
including the urban
poor.

At least 30% of
disaster-affected
people benefit from
livelihoods support
(including indirect
benefits to household
members).

Informal field visits to Turkana
and Garissa revealed almost all
agencies and NGO partners are
engaged in livelihoods support
(cash-for-work/CFW, food-forwork/FFW, training,
unconditional cash transfers).
The scale of the impact is
questionable, though no official
statistics/assessments have
been provided to the sector lead.
45% of target beneficiaries
received assistance through the
agriculture and livestock sectors.
% of targeted men,
women, boys and
girls receiving timely
food distributions
(FFA).

EARLY RECOVERY

Percentage of
humanitarian
response projects
that incorporate early
recovery or DRR
components.
Adequate FCS for
FFA beneficiaries.
% of targeted men,
women, boys and
girls receiving timely
cash distributions
(CFA).
Adequate FCS for
80% of CFA
beneficiaries.




Monthly and timely
relief distributions of
food to 606,000
drought-affected
targeted beneficiaries
between the months of
August 2011 and
February 2012
(100%).
80% of FFA
beneficiaries have
adequate FCS.
Monthly and timely
cash distributions food
to 477,800 droughtaffected targeted
beneficiaries between
the months of August
2011 and February
2012 (100%).
80% of CFA
beneficiaries have
adequate FCS.
14

Output: Reached a maximum of
429,740 million beneficiaries
(71% of target).

Outcome: Adequate FCS =
Acceptable of 86% of
households.

Output: Reached a maximum of
291,280 million beneficiaries
(61% of target) through cash
transfers.

Outcome: Adequate FCS =
Acceptable for 72% of
households
Underachieved: PRRO faced
pipeline breaks in CFA; a
maximum of 352,000
beneficiaries (35% of target)
were reached. A large number
missed their cash allocations
affecting households’ ability to
access food. The areas were
compensated retroactively partly
in October and November.

KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Indicators


Targets
Achieved as of October 2012

Disaster risk
reduction and early
recovery approaches
integrated within the
education sector
intervention.
Capacity
development of the
education system is
strengthened both at
national and subnational levels to
effectively respond to
education in
emergencies.







Governance
structures at national,
sub-national and
community levels
have sufficient
disaster
preparedness to
reduce the impact of
crises and response
capacity to support
the early recovery of
affected people,
building on existing
knowledge, skills and
coping mechanisms.





Kenya’s Disaster Risk
Management (DRM)
Bill is passed into law.
District Disaster
Committees (DDCs)
have improved their
response capacity
(from 2011 levels) and
ability to coordinate
through the political
hierarchy to the
Ministry of State for
Special Programmes
(MOSSP) level and up
to community level.
40 community disaster
management
committees
established.
40 community disaster
management plans
developed
Qualitative
assessment:
Information
management and
liaison mechanism
exists for humanitarian
and development
actors to harness the
strengths of each
other.
15



At least six schools in Wajir and
Turkana counties have set up
green houses to supplement the
school diet with fresh produce.
Sector partners trained on ways
of integrating DRR in their
programming.
More than 8,000 teachers
trained in peacebuilding
More than 300 members of
SMCs trained on boarding
school management.
Peace campaign targeting at
least 400 pupils from districts
previously affected by postelection violence rolled out.
MoE Officers at headquarters
and on the ground participated in
assessments of the Education
Sector.
Sub-national sectors initiated in
north-western Kenya.
Final DRM Draft Law finalized
and presented before end of
July. DRM strategy finalized
.Information management and
liaison mechanism project to link
humanitarian and development
actors to operate together has
not been funded,
81 (out of 240) DDCs have been
trained. Further review of
project activities needed to
measure the impact of the
training.
Supported and already
established MoSSP information
management system for
effective
humanitarian/development
action. Profiling ER
interventions among diverse
humanitarian actors in the
ASALs.
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Indicators
Targets
Achieved as of October 2012
HEALTH

Adequate measures
in place to prevent
detect and control
cholera and other
waterborne diseases.




Health sector tested
cholera response
plans in place in
counties most
vulnerable to
cholera/AWD
Counties most at risk
have cholera response
officers trained and in
place.
Cholera infection
control initiatives in
designated health
facilities.
Members respond
within agreed time
frames (assessment
within 48 hours and
response in 72 hours
after notification) to all
reported cholera
outbreaks in their
county with
interventions in
support of MoPHS.










Cholera response plan
developed at national level but
yet to be rolled out to the
districts/counties.
Training for district public health
officers will be rolled out to the
22 priority districts after the
Training of Trainers (ToT).
No cholera outbreak has been
reported this year.
Supplied communication
equipment to 65 district health
teams for early warning and
reporting.
All major disease outbreaks
were contained (dengue,
cholera, measles, malaria etc.).
Cold-chain system for
emergency and routine
immunization rehabilitated in 95
locations in the ASAL regions.
Five utility transports made
available to five deprived
districts in the ASAL regions.
Contingency plans for the El
Niño and disease outbreaks
developed by the Health Sector.
65 district health teams in the
ASAL regions oriented on early
warning / early action.
Essential drugs prepositioned for
surge capacity.
AGRICULTURE &
LIVESTOCK


Early warning
mechanisms, food
security information
systems and
vulnerability analysis
inform preparedness
and response at both
national and county
levels in order to
reduce negative
effects on vulnerable
groups in pastoral,
agro-pastoral and
marginal agricultural
disaster-prone areas.
Vulnerable men and
women in selected
drought-affected
parts of ASALs
protect and rebuild
livestock assets
through livestock

Two early warning and
food security
information
assessments
conducted and
reported.







Four livestock disease
surveillances
conducted and reports
on disease outbreak.
Five million animals
vaccinated and
treated.
16


Medium and high rainfall food
security assessment (Oct 2011)
Short rains assessment (Feb
2012).
Mid-season food security
assessment (June 2012).
Long rains assessment (August
2012).
Medium and high rainfall food
security assessment (Nov 2012).
15 participatory disease
searches on Rift Valley fever
and peste des petits ruminants
diseases carried out.
2,605 disease surveillance
reports done through digital pen
technology.
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Indicators
disease surveillance
and control,
restocking and
destocking, fodder
production,
rangeland
rehabilitation and
training on issues
related to resilience.
Targets

Achieved as of October 2012
5,000 acres of land put
under fodder.









Vulnerable smallscale female and
male farmers in
marginal agricultural
areas sustainably
improve their
agricultural
production by use of
quality and suitable
farm inputs and
greater capacity to
use improved
production
technologies.





Vulnerable men,
women and children
in pastoral,
agropastoral and
marginal agricultural


2.000 MTs of various
improved droughttolerant crop seeds
distributed to men,
women and other
vulnerable groups.
Over 10,000 MTs of
various droughttolerant crops valued
at $2.9 million
produced.
10,000 women and
men trained on
improved production
technologies and using
improved storage
facilities.
1,000 MTs of seeds of
various improved
drought-tolerant crop
varieties produced
through communitybased seed-bulking
systems.

10,000 acres under
soil and water
conservation.
50 water harvesting
structures constructed.

17




Seven million animals
vaccinated against Rift Valley
fever, peste des petits
ruminants, and contagious
caprine pleuropneumonia
reaching 1,020,000 beneficiaries
(715,000 men, 305,000 women).
18 Livestock Emergency
Guidelines (LEGS) trainings
conducted in 18 counties with
the focus on District Steering
Groups (DSGs). The training
reached 406 staff (361 men, 45
women).
Over 2,000 acres of land put
under fodder.
2,250 small stock (sheep, goats)
and 17,500 poultry restocked
440 beehives distributed.
Inter-community peace
negotiations benefited an
estimated 24,000 people through
improved access to grazing and
water.
Infrastructure of 12 livestock
markets rehabilitated.
38 livestock market engaged
with county council on the comanagement model.
860 MTs seeds of various
drought-tolerant crop varieties
distributed to a total of 264,276
beneficiaries comprising 107,895
men and 156,381 women. The
seeds were planted in over
60,000 acres and produced over
124,000 MTs of grains.
Over two million cuttings each of
cassava and sweet potatoes
were distributed to 16,000
vulnerable farmers including
6,000 men and 10,000 women.
Training conducted to over
12,000 farmers (7,300 women
and 4,700 men) in various parts
of marginal agricultural areas of
eastern Kenya.
120 MTs of quality seeds
produced through communitybased seed bulking systems.
460 drip irrigation kits
distributed.
10,000 households participated
in the construction of soil and
water conservation structures,
conserving over 5,000 acres of
their farms by digging terraces
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Indicators
Targets
areas become more
resilient through
climate change
adaptation and DRR
approaches.


Achieved as of October 2012
10,000 households
practicing small-scale
irrigation and 10,000
acres put under smallscale irrigation.
5,000 acres of
rangeland
rehabilitated.


through voucher for work and
CFW activities.
16 water harvesting structures
(sand dams) constructed
through voucher for work
activities and three shallow
wells.
Supported the rehabilitation of
six small-scale, communitybased irrigation schemes
supporting over 2,000 people.
Plans are complete for another
eight small-scale irrigation
schemes with over 8,000 people
in Garrissa and Turkana
counties.
Progress towards objective 2 and challenges:
Agriculture and livestock
Categories and disaggregated number of people in need and beneficiaries
Category
Number of people in need
Number of people targeted
Number of people reached
Dec 2011
Dec 2011
November 2012
Female
Male
Food and
livelihood
insecurity
in ASAL
areas
1,250,000
850,000
2,100,000
800,000
500,000
1,300,000
474,000
519,000
993,000
Urban
vulnerable
1,000,000
750,000
1,750,000
350,000
250,000
600,000
4,000
2,500
6,500
Vulnerable in high
and
medium
rainfall
areas
400,000
350,000
750,000
200,000
175,000
375,000
25,000
10,500
35,500
2,650,000
1,950,000
4,600,000
1,350,000
925,000
2,275,000
503,000
532,000
1,035,000
Totals
Total
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
The severe drought that culminated with the failure of the long rains of 2011, following several
years of successive dry conditions and poor rains, hurt vulnerable pastoralist and agropastoralist
communities in Kenya, particularly in the country’s ASALs. According to the Agriculture and
Livestock Sector partners, an estimated 4.6 million people required livelihood support at the time
of the EHRP launch in December 2011, including 2.2 million people in need of food aid. An
assessment following the October to December 2011 short rains noted improved conditions, with
availability of water, browse and pasture having improved livestock productivity. Food supply
also improved following the short rains harvests.
The mixed performance of the long rains from March to May 2012 resulted in contrasting food
security conditions. Although the food security situation improved in some areas, the number of
18
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
food-insecure people declined only marginally. An estimated 2.1 million people were classified in
either the “crisis” or “stressed” phases of food insecurity. In general, the food-insecure population
declined by about 20% in the pastoral districts but increased by nearly 25% in the south-eastern
and coastal marginal agricultural zones.
Food and livelihood interventions contributed to food security improvements in many places and
moderated the possible decline in the food security situation in areas where the rains performed
poorly. Despite recommendations from the Government of Kenya (GoK) and sector partners for
support to livelihood and resilience-building emergency and early recovery programmes, the
Agriculture and Livestock Sector received only 25% of the funding requested ($8.7 million of
$35.5 million requested).
In terms of livelihood support, partners still managed to reach 45% of the 2.2 million beneficiaries
deemed most vulnerable at the launch of the EHRP in December 2011. Despite underfunding,
partners made use of synergies in existing programmes, efficiencies in programme
implementation and good coordination to reach these beneficiaries.
With regard to livestock, interventions included strategic restocking of animals, support to disease
surveillance and animal health, support to livestock markets, community natural resource
management and fodder production. Agriculture partners supported provision and bulking of
drought-tolerant seeds, vouchers for seeds, tools, food and non-food items, post-harvest storage,
water harvesting and irrigation schemes. Following early warning of an increased risk of poor
rains in the eastern parts of the country during the March to May long-rains season, agriculture
and livestock sector partners developed a 90-day response plan to mitigate any further erosion of
livelihoods in these areas through support to remote markets and commercial destocking.
Support was also provided to areas affected by flash floods and districts affected by the outbreak
of maize-lethal necrosis disease later in the year.
Challenges







Distribution of free food and non-food items has created dependency of vulnerable
households in most ASAL areas. More effort is required to sensitize and convince
communities to engage in more sustainable activities, such as voucher/cash-for-work
activities.
Free distribution of food has led to market distortions in some cases.
Limited resources despite large area and high number of beneficiaries led to limited
coverage.
Short project duration does not always permit adequate follow-up of agriculture and
livestock activities, which often require a longer time horizon.
Getting gender-segregated data/information in agriculture has proven to be difficult.
Despite a significant amount of work in promoting fodder development in the ASALs,
access to quality dry-land seed remains a major limiting factor
Poor infrastructure negatively affected the delivery of time-critical inputs, such as poultry.
Lessons learned

Building communities’ capacity on community-based seed production as opposed to free
seed distribution resulted in access and spread of seeds of improved drought-tolerant
varieties of open-pollinated crops such sorghum, millets, beans, cowpea, green grams,
pigeon pea and dolichos lablab.
19
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013







Engaging communities in voucher-/cash-for-work activities, especially in rehabilitating
collapsed irrigation infrastructures and constructing soil and water conservation,
empowered them and created ownership and sustainability and improved local economy.
The potential of marginal agriculture areas of eastern Kenya can be harnessed by
constructing water harvesting structures such as sand dams and using such dams for
small-scale high-value crop production (e.g. vegetable irrigation).
Food security at the household level can be enhanced through the use of metal silo
storage technology.
Engagement with markets and market forces is essential for ASAL-based livelihood work,
particularly for livestock but also for crop production (i.e., due to transport limitations and
a highly dispersed population, fresh produce markets are limited).
Village community-banking systems are useful building blocks for development in the
ASALs. However, they need to be linked to other initiatives (such as markets, water user
associations or small-scale trade) in order to ensure that there are opportunities for
investment of money saved.
The use of meat vouchers through the dry period can be exceptionally effective in
maintaining functional markets and livestock prices.
Small-scale high-value vegetable production (particularly in ASALs) can be an
exceptionally effective way of empowering women and youth.
Coordination
The engagement of UN agencies (including sector leads) in the disaster risk reduction (DRR)
elements of the current UNDAF Outcome 2.2 has provided a platform to work with development
partners on elements of the resilience-building agenda. The working group on this outcome area
has ramped up efforts over the past year, with a focus on coordination, policy and capacitybuilding. The Ending Drought Emergencies country plan, which has been elaborated by the GoK,
has also provided key direction in the national leadership of resilience-building activities.
Early recovery
The Early Recovery Sector led a number of initiatives around documenting programmes and
initiatives that incorporate early recovery and disaster risk reduction approaches. This is
expected to provide useful best practices to help organisations implement these approaches in
the design of their preparedness and response initiatives. Profiling and documented field level
early recovery initiatives in Garissa / Turkana were also undertaken. In addition, 150 GoK staff
members with decision-making authority have been trained in DRR / ER.
Nutrition
Resilience of most affected populations was influenced through continued focus on scaling-up
High impact nutrition interventions (HINIs), thus ability for beneficiaries to demand and use the
nutrition services. Malnourished beneficiaries were linked to other sectorial interventions like
GFD, WASH and livestock and agriculture to cushion the underlying vulnerabilities.
The strengthening of existing GoK capacities and systems through the maintained operational
capacity of the UNICEF-supported nutrition support officers ensured that the district/county
government officials were able to deliver nutrition services adequately even in heightened
emergency situations such as conflicts and security situations. Inclusion of nutrition indicators in
HMIS and the rollout of DHIS and routine feedback system have increased reporting,
centralization and dissemination of nutrition information, and thus strengthened the early warning
systems to ensure early response.
20
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
In terms of challenges, strengthened reporting is still needed in urban and non-emergency areas.
There is also a need to improve the inter-sector collaboration at sub-national level and linkages
with other relevant government sectors for nutrition outcomes/nutrition sensitive policies.
Health
302,000 children under age 5 were vaccinated against measles and polio and received vitamin A
supplementation and deworming in the Dadaab refugee camps and five hosting districts. In
addition, monthly health promotion activities were conducted in 30 communities in Turkana
district. Surge capacity was specifically established in Garissa for response to the Dadaab
refugee camp and health kits were made available for 300,000 families in refugee camps and
host communities. Potential large-scale disease outbreaks were averted because of early
detection and the availability of essential drugs and laboratory reagents.
Food
Achievements noted under the Food Sector include eight districts launching DRR/resilience and
asset creation food projects.100% of 600 targeted micro-DRR projects are also underway.
Nutrition is also linked to other assistance programmes, including food and WASH. Focus was
also given to improved communal water storage and strengthened capacity in water
management. In terms of challenges, it was noted that cash transfers to CFA beneficiaries were
low because of resource constraints. In this regard, a strategic decision was reached to use a
combination of both food and cash to affected areas. Retroactive compensations for the month of
May and June were effected in September and October 2012.
WASH
The Sector encouraged approaches that built on community resilience in WASH interventions.
This included the strengthening of capacities for water management committees, with a focus on
giving communities knowledge to sustainably maintain water sources; use of community-based,
participatory approaches in hygiene and sanitation promotion, with a focus on beneficiaries as
agents of change in their communities; and harnessing water from rainy seasons and improving
communal water storage to protect communities from prolonged periods of drought.
Education
Educational materials were distributed, schools rehabilitated and school gardens and waterharvesting projects were undertaken. The Sector also focused on peace education and life skills
and also included water management and food security. Emergency Preparedness and
Response Plan (EPRP) and DRR material was finalized with the MoE in lead. The Education
Sector also provided educational supplies and boarding supplies to schools in drought-affected
areas outside camps.
21
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Strategic objective #3
Increased commitment on the part of the GoK and development actors to address issues of
chronic vulnerability and provide durable solutions.
Indicators

Humanitarian
principles and
priorities
reflected in
national and
development
initiatives.
Targets

Sector achievements as of October 2012

Improvement to
the extent to
which
humanitarian
principles are
reflected in
national and
development
plans.











Humanitarian partners’ engagement in the
second mid-term plan of the GoK under
vision 2030.
Engagement in the IDP bill and the Breast
Milk Substitutes Regulation and Control Act,
2012 (both passed in October 2012).
GoK has included stunting in the Kenya
Health Sector Support Programme III to
ensure funding and accountability to address
stunting.
Multi-year funding being provided by DfID
and EU to meet longer-term nutritional goals.
GoK preparing to launch the Scaling Up
Nutrition initiative and the Food and Nutrition
Security Policy.
Continued advocacy for the passing of the
Disaster Response Management Policy.
Sectors contributing to coordination and
implementation of Outcome 2.2 under the
UNDAF.
The Food Sector has provided capacity
building to the GoK in dry-land farming
(through training and exchange
programmes).
Humanitarian WASH actors are now
represented in the key sector working groups
convened by MoPHS and MoWI.
Education in Emergencies to be integrated
into the National Education Sector Support
Programme
Engagement/support provided for
establishment of NDMA.
Support provided the Ending Drought
Emergencies Country Plan.
Progress towards objective 3 and challenges:
Coordination
2012 provided a number of opportunities for humanitarian partners to engage with national and
development frameworks towards the improved integration of humanitarian priorities. The
formation of the National Drought Management Authority in November 2011, whose
responsibilities include the coordination and leadership in the prevention and mitigation of drought
emergencies and in climate change adaptation, saw collaboration from a number of humanitarian
actors in providing technical advice and resources. In addition, partners have also supported the
development of policies and legislation which have implications for future humanitarian response
(such as the IDP bill and policy, the draft Disaster Response Management policy, the Breast Milk
22
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Substitutes Act and others). Furthermore, progress has already been achieved in relation to the
establishment of coordination mechanisms at county level. In terms of development frameworks,
UN agencies with humanitarian programmes are also engaged in the current UNDAF process,
including around the issue of DRR.
Early recovery/disaster risk reduction
Progress is noted in the continued advocacy and lobbying for the enactment of the Disaster
Response Management Policy through MoSSP. In addition, DRR/ER-specific ToRs have been
developed for GoK focal points for inclusion in performance contracts.
Health
The Health Sector is facilitating the finalisation of the pandemic /large-scale disaster
preparedness and response plan by the National Disaster Operations Centre. The sector is also
supporting electronic Early Warning and Response Networks (EWARNs) to enable remote health
facilities to promptly report disasters and disease outbreaks.
Challenges
The national-level emergency coordination structures were fragmented and national leadership
was delegated to several ministries or departments. Health and nutrition were divorced from
each other as two separate sectors under WHO and UNICEF respectively but chaired by one
Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation. At the Health Sector level, there was more participation
from the Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation and very little from the Ministry of Medical
Services. There was also a threefold increase in per capita attendance at health facilities for
normal conditions which were not factored in the original planning.
Lessons learned
Enhancing early warning systems in targeted high-risk districts, pre-positioning and surge
capacities at strategic locations improved early disease detection and response to disease
outbreaks with large epidemic potential, which were promptly averted. It was also important to
disaggregate national disease trends. Whereas the national data showed little deviation from the
norm, when the data was disaggregated and analysed based on districts, large discrepancies in
the incidence of diseases and disease outbreaks were detected for malaria, measles and
diarrhoea.
Food
Four GoK officials were sent for training to Israel (plastic agriculture); two GoK and two WFP
officials attended exchange programmes in Ethiopia on the R4 initiative; and four vehicles were
donated to the GoK line ministries (two to the Ministry of Water and Irrigation, one to the Ministry
of Agriculture, and one to the Ministry of Public Health).
Education
The GoK through the Ministry of Education has participated actively in training of sector partners
in conducting assessments and in information collection and sharing. Education in Emergencies
is being included in the National Education Sector Support Programme which will lead to a
cabinet paper for financial support. Participation of senior officials of the MoE in policy
discussions and the inclusion of semi-autonomous education agencies such as KIE, TSC (now
autonomous) and other stakeholders including the University of Nairobi in Education in
Emergencies is an indication of serious commitment. Also of note is progress with regard to
23
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Education in Emergencies to be integrated into the National Education Sector Support
Programme.
Nutrition
More than 10 years of advocacy and lobbying has resulted in the Breast Milk Substitutes
(Regulation and Control) Act 2012 enacted by Parliament in October 2012. The Act provides for
appropriate marketing and distribution of breast milk substitutes, ensuring optimal, safe and
adequate nutrition for Kenyan children. There has been increased political commitment from high
level interactions such as the launch of the FNSP which paved way for Kenya signing up as the
30th country to the “Scaling Up Nutrition” movement which provides a framework and a road map
for the realization of the MDGs. The nutrition plan of action defines the high-impact interventions
from community, county to national level and articulates opportunities for resource mobilization,
enhancing partnership and ensuring better financing of nutrition.
Increased commitment on the part of the GoK and development actors to address issues of
chronic vulnerability and to provide durable solutions has been evident. For instance, the GoK
has increased the funding of nutrition allocation as part of the Government heath sector budget
and has negotiated a credit from the World Bank to fund therapeutic nutrition supplies.
Challenges noted include poor target-setting, costing of plans and the need to ensure consistency
in systematic tracking of funding for nutrition for the Government health sector and other sectors.
24
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Review of humanitarian funding
Millions $
Since the first EHRP process in 2008, a total of $2.9 billion has been requested through the
mechanism to mobilize assistance for the internally displaced, refugees and those affected by
food and livelihoods crisis, disease outbreaks and other emergencies. To date $2 billion (73%)
has been received against the EHRP since 2008.
800
Funding of the Kenya appeal
700
600
500
Unfunded amount
400
Amount received
300
200
100
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
In 2012, the humanitarian community appealed for $797 million, of which $578 million (73%) has
been received as of November 2012. An additional $16.5 million has been pledged which, if
realized, will increase funding to 75%. Of funds committed to the 2012 appeal, $132 million is
reported in carry-over funding from 2011 in the food and refugee sectors. An additional $94
million in funding to projects outside of the EHRP framework has been reported to FTS. (Of that
$94 million, donors reported almost half of it without specifying the recipient organization, making
it likely that a major part of it is actually for actions planned in the CAP.)
Funding trends within the appeal are in line with those seen in previous years, with the Food
Sector and refugee response accounting for more than 82% of funds requested and 89% of the
total funds received. In the other sectors, relative coverage continues to vary significantly.
However, there have been notable improvements in the relative coverage of some sectors in
2012, most notably in education and health. Early recovery, protection and WASH currently
remain below 25% funded.
In looking at project prioritization, the projects ranked as highest priority overall received 75% of
the $744 million requested whilst only 7% of the $53 million required for medium-priority projects
was received. Similarly, funding in line with gender marker scores saw the majority of funds
allocated to projects with either a 2a (projects designed to contribute significantly to gender
equality) or 2b (projects whose the principle purpose is to advance gender equality) score. In
25
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
total these projects represented 89% of the total EHRP requirements and 91% ($526 million) of
funds received. Projects with a score of 1 (those designed to contribute in some limited way to
gender equality) received 41% of the $74.5 million required.
The largest donors in 2012 were the U.S., the U.K., Japan, the European Commission, Germany
and Canada. Collectively their contributions have accounted for 83% of contributions in 2012
(excluding carry-over funds).
Total funding per donor to projects listed in the
appeal
Other
17%
United States
41%
Canada
5%
Germany
6%
EC
8%
Japan
9%
United Kingdom
14%
Pooled funds
In early 2012, early warning of a possible intensification of drought conditions in parts of eastern
and north-eastern Kenya prompted the Kenya Humanitarian Partnership Team to request $2
million from the CERF rapid response window to launch early action initiatives. The funds were
channelled through FAO and UNICEF to undertake priority interventions in the agriculture and
livestock sector and to ensure a continuation of critical nutrition interventions.
In 2012, the ERF has so far allocated $1,165,654 to eight organizations (four local and four
international organizations) for response in the areas of Agriculture and Livestock; Capacity
Building in the form of security training; Early Recovery; Education; Food Security; WASH; and
Protection.
26
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
3. NEEDS ANALYSIS
Despite improvements in drought conditions in the ASALs, Kenya still faces a range of disaster
risks. Communities remain vulnerable to disasters due to factors, including poverty, livelihood
insecurity, and settlement in areas prone to seasonal flooding or with poor infrastructure and
services, such as informal urban settlements. These factors, coupled with recurrent hazards
such as droughts, floods, landslides, epidemic outbreaks and climatic change, pose significant
risks to much of Kenya’s population.
According to the Ministry of Planning and National Development, Kenya’s population is about 40
million people, with an average life expectancy of 53 years for men and 55 years for women in
2011. This population, growing at the rate of 2.7% and largely youthful (60% of the population is
under 25 years old) is bound to be adversely affected, particularly with the high poverty rates
(57% of Kenyans live below the poverty line), unemployment, the high prevalence of HIV/AIDS
and an economy largely dependent on rain-fed agriculture. These indicators suggest that a
significant proportion of the population is highly vulnerable to disasters, and any small,
predisposing factor may result in emergencies of high proportion, often culminating in national
disasters.
Food and livelihood security
The mixed performance of the long rains
(March-May 2012) caused contrasting foodsecurity conditions in Kenya. Although the
situation improved in some areas, the
number of food-insecure people declined
only marginally. According to the 2012 Long
Rains Season Assessment Report issued by
the Kenya Food Security Steering Group
(KFSSG) in September 2012, an estimated
2.1 million people in Kenya’s ASALs are
classified as being in either the crisis or
stressed phases of food insecurity,
John Kariuki at his cabbage farm at Deffo, Njoro, Kenya ©
compared with 2.2 million people after the
Rachel Kibui/IRIN
short-rains assessments in February 2012.
In general, the food-insecure population declined by about 20% in the pastoral districts but
increased by nearly 25% in the south-eastern and coastal marginal agricultural zones. The
marginal mixed farming areas of the south-eastern and coastal lowlands suffered their third
successive failed or poor season.
Most parts of the country are expected to receive enhanced rainfall ranging from mild to moderate
El Niño episodes during the October-December 2012 short-rains season. Rainfall distribution in
space and time is also expected to be generally good, but it is likely to cause localized flooding.
The peak lean season is expected to be unusually intense in most parts of the south-eastern and
coastal marginal agriculture zone, and in parts of the north-eastern pastoral area including
southern Wajir, northern Garissa, Tana River and Ijara. In some of these areas, tensions,
conflicts and insecurity may limit households’ capacity to engage in normal livelihood activities.
27
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Although maize prices are expected to continue declining, they remain consistently above the
five-year average. The decline is likely to be slowed down by the below-average long-rains
output and maize hoarding by households as a precaution during the election period. Similarly,
heightened political activities may disrupt market activities, constraining supply and consequently
increasing consumer prices.
Based on predictions by the Kenya Meteorological Department, enhanced rains are also
expected during the March-May 2013 long-rains season. As a result, the food-insecure
population is expected to decline from 2.1 million to 1.8 million people. This positive outlook is
strengthened by casual labour opportunities in rural areas; expected increased output of crops
between January and February 2013; improved livestock productivity; and a likely decrease in
food prices due to increased production.
Enhanced short rains will result in a considerable recharge of water sources and regeneration of
pasture and browse in pastoral zones. Consequently, milk production, consumption and surplus
supply at markets will increase. Similarly, water availability, access and consumption will improve
in many parts, particularly in the pastoral and marginal agricultural livelihood zones where water
access has been a problem.
Flooding during the short-rains season could also disrupt food and livestock markets, as well as
waterborne and vectorborne livestock diseases that characteristically accompany above average
rains. The enhanced rainfall also jeopardizes harvesting; there may be substantial losses due to
rotting as heavy rains fall on maize. The spread of maize-lethal necrosis disease is also a
continued threat.
Despite improvements to pasture and browse conditions in 2012, successive previous dry periods
combined with poor long rains in 2012 continue to negatively affect north-eastern and northwestern pastoral areas, as well as some areas along the coastal belt. Recurrent drought
continues to be the major food-security threat in Kenya’s ASALs. Crop failures, livestock deaths
and resource-based conflict negatively impact the livelihoods of pastoralists and agropastoralists
in these areas, which continue to experience food insecurity at the household level. Overall, the
inability of food-insecure households to recover fully from recurrent shocks and hazards suggests
the need for a mix of immediate and medium-term food and non-food interventions that seek to
mitigate urgent needs, restore livelihoods and build resilience.
Nutrition
Nutrition surveys carried out in the ASAL areas in 2012 indicate a significant reduction in GAM
and SAM levels in Turkana, Mandera, Moyale and Kajiado. The expected caseload of children
under age 5 suffering from acute malnutrition in the ASAL areas has declined from 385,000 in
January 2012 to 300,000 as of October 2012. This is due to the increased access of quality
HINIs and the food-security improvements thanks to food and non-food interventions. However,
the situation in Wajir County and Mandera East has not improved. Mandera and Wajir counties
account for 75,644 (25%) of the expected caseload. The access and use of quality nutrition
services in ASAL regions remain very low. In urban informal settlements, about 9,500 children
will require treatment for acute malnutrition in 2013. The difference in child malnutrition between
the wealthiest and poorest households is twice as great in urban areas, highlighting the inequities
of urbanization and affecting 1.7 million children living in poverty in urban areas.
28
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Key infant and young-child feeding practices are still poor in Kenya: 58% of babies start to
breastfeed within one hour of birth.2 Fewer than 32% of babies are exclusively breastfed within
the first six months3 and only 6% of hospitals meet national care standards. Other foods and
drinks are introduced too early, some immediately after birth. Interventions to promote, protect
and support infant feeding need to be accelerated.
Micronutrient deficiencies continue to be highly prevalent among children under age 5 and
women. According to the 2012 nutrition surveys and nutrition routine data from the District Health
Information system (DHIS), incremental gains have been reported but the indicators are below
national targets. Overall, only 36% of children under age 5 received one dose of vitamin A (HIS
January-June 2012), while only 11% of pregnant women received the minimum recommended
dose of iron folate (DHIS January-June 2012). Resilience of the most affected people can be
significantly influenced through continued focus on scaling up HINIs while continuing to
strengthen existing capacities and systems.
Health
In 2013, Health Sector partners will continue to respond to various health emergencies such as
outbreaks of dengue fever, rift valley fever and other haemorrhagic fevers, as well as cholera,
polio, malaria, hepatitis E and measles in refugee camps and host communities. Conflicts,
terrorism and potential election violence will also contribute to mass casualty disasters in the
targeted hotspots as well as urban fires in Nairobi and the large slums. The Health Sector has
often responded promptly, thereby mitigating the disasters’ impact.
Refugees’ health-related humanitarian needs will persist, especially as the camps are currently
experiencing disease outbreaks. These are compounded by cross-border challenges such as
easy transmission of diseases. The weak and over-stretched health-care delivery system has not
recovered. According to the PDNA, it will require at least $60 million over five years, a process
that has yet to begin. The devolution of governance will also pose a challenge to the Health
Sector in the short term for management and coordination capacity.
The Health Sector is therefore targeting prompt response to humanitarian needs, supporting
resilience within the communities and also supporting capacity-building for the counties to
respond to DRR and disaster management in their localities.
WASH
Rainfall distribution during the October-December rains is expected to be generally good over
most parts of the country, and the water levels for surface-water sources and the recharge
capacity for groundwater sources are supposed to increase. However, localized flooding is
expected in some areas, particularly in the western part of the country and the Tana River basin.
The last El Niño event in 1999 affected at least 1.5 million people in the country.
Although the flooding situation is expected to be less severe this time, it may still cause
displacements and disrupt water and sanitation services, which may increase the risk of
transmission of waterborne diseases such as cholera, typhoid, dysentery and malaria. Other
typical at-risk areas for waterborne diseases include peri-urban slums and informal settlements,
as well as IDP camps where basic water and sanitation infrastructure is not adequate and
minimum requirements of clean water and sanitation are usually not met. Cross-border
2
3
KDHS, 2003
KDHS, 2008
29
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
movements, particularly along the Somalia and Ethiopia borders, have also shown that
communities living along the borders are vulnerable to waterborne diseases.
The WASH Sector will therefore need to prioritize “soft” interventions during this period, including
promoting household water treatment and storage practices, hygiene awareness and provision of
options for safe sanitation practices. Infrastructural support should take into consideration
sustainability issues such as the WASH facility designs and structures for maintaining the
facilities.
Education
Vulnerable children’s education is affected by
various emergencies, such as droughts
affecting the arid and semi-arid districts, with
140,000 children requiring support to continue
their education. Election violence and floods
forecasts may affect over 64,000 school-going
children4 in Western Kenya, parts of Upper
Eastern, parts of North Eastern and the Tana
Delta.
Some pastoralist and agricultural
marginal areas are experiencing a slow onset
of drought due to below-average rainfall. Students at a secondary school in Narok, Kenya © Wendy
Therefore, a key objective is to enhance Stone/IRIN
school retention and continuity of access to education for nearly 1 million boys and girls by
providing food, water, hygiene, learning materials and gender-sensitive sanitation facilities.
The continuing influx of refugees has strained the existing educational facilities in the host
communities around Dadaab and Kakuma refugee camps. According to an inter-agency
assessment of the Education Sector in Dadaab, the pupil-classroom ratio is 113:1, while the
teacher-pupil ratio is 1:85. Moreover, over 48,000 refugee school-age boys and girls are
currently out of school. There is an urgent need to support the refugee schools as well as the
host-community schools around Kakuma and Dadaab refugee camps with requisite educational
teaching and learning materials. There is a further need to train the refugee teachers on multigrade teaching to handle large classes. In Dadaab, for example, only 20% of the more than 980
teachers are certified. Teachers in host communities could also benefit from psycho-social
programmes offered to teachers working in the camps.
Increasing caseloads of refugees in Dadaab and Kakuma refugee camps have also become
issues of great concern. For instance, 63% of the school-age population in Kakuma refugee
camp is missing out on primary education as the classes available can only accommodate 37% of
the population.5 Girls are particularly affected as many are not in school and only a few transit to
secondary school for those who attend school. The total transition rate in Kakuma to secondary
schools is 7%, while in Dadaab it is 5%. It is noteworthy that about 26,283 girls (close to 60%)
are still missing out on education, while 20,760 of the boys (close to 40%) are missing out on
education in Dadaab according to the same assessment.
Between November 2011 and October 2012, varied incidents of violence in Isiolo, Moyale and
Tana Delta districts disrupted learning in schools, affected at least 6,000 pupils and displaced
4
5
Assessments by OCHA October 2012
Education needs assessment conducted by SC-UK in May 2012.
30
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
communities. Attacks on schools were witnessed as an emerging issue and verified through an
assessment carried out by the MoE and also from the findings of the DSG in Isiolo. .
Refugees
The precarious situation in Somalia as a result of conflict and insecurity continues to generate
knock-on effects in neighbouring Kenya where approximately 471,000 refugees are hosted in the
north-eastern Dadaab camps. Despite the continued closure of the Kenya-Somalia border and
the suspension of registration of new arrivals, an estimated 100 Somalis arrive per day. They are
reportedly continuing to stream in and settle in the outskirts of Dagahaley and in Ifo 2 camps.
Insecurity in Dadaab continues to be a serious problem affecting the delivery of services to
refugees and their physical protection and well-being. There have been incidents of humanitarian
staff abduction; various improvised-device explosions mainly targeting police escorts; vehicle
hijackings; assassinations of refugee community leaders; banditry incidents inside and outside
the camps; and several demonstrations and riots by refugee and host communities. The
proximity of the operation to the porous border with Somalia and the ongoing Kenyan military
involvement inside the country has been a key cause of the heightened insecurity in the whole
North-Eastern Province, particularly in the Dadaab camps.
The Dadaab complex registered more than 5,700 new arrivals from Somalia, bringing the total
population in these camps to some 474,100 people. However, the biggest jump in population
growth occurred in Kakuma Camp
in Turkana County, where 14,000
new arrivals, mostly from South
Sudan, were registered between
January and September 2012.
With a population exceeding
101,000, Kakuma is rapidly
running out of space. There has
been a deepening strain on limited
essential
services
and
infrastructure capacity due to the
rapid growth in refugee numbers,
resulting in risks to public health
and the safety and welfare of Refugees queue at the UNHCR field office for tent allocations at Ifo camp,
Dadaab, eastern Kenya © John Ndiku/OCHA
refugees and host communities.
To address the issue of hosting new arrivals, a new camp site known as Kalobeyey, with a
capacity for 80,000 people, has been identified. Authorization for camp construction is still being
pursued.
Protection
The lack of comprehensive registration and profiling data on IDPs, particularly in reference to the
so-called integrated IDPs and forest evictees, continues to challenge the protection and
assistance environment for IDPs in the country.
The humanitarian crisis facing integrated IDPs who were affected by the 2007/2008 post-election
violence (PEV) and the forest evictees (arising from environmental management or developmentinduced evictions) in the country is yet to be fully addressed. However, during 2012 there was a
notable change in policy, with the Government acknowledging the existence of forest evictees
31
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
and squatters. There are ongoing efforts to identify resettlement land for these groups. Recently,
a substantial number of Mau Forest Complex evictees were resettled, with the Government
reportedly facing immense constraints in providing NFIs (plastic sheets and basic domestic
items). There is still a need for close monitoring and support to the Government in the provision
of material assistance for forest evictees and victims of natural disasters.
On the political front, pursuant to the Constitution promulgated in 2010 and the reforms outlined in
Agenda item 4, Kenya has continued to implement constitutional, legislative and institutional
reforms ahead of the general elections on 4 March 2013.
The implementation of the Agenda 4 reforms have been ongoing, with some reform components
being decried as slow paced and constantly undermined by political conflicts. Critically, the the
Truth Justice and Reconciliation Commission (TJRC) has yet to release a substantive report on
its findings. Notably, the Government’s judiciary arm has been lauded for its positive efforts in
implementing judicial reforms and in restoring its image of independence and accountability
among citizens. More specifically, the establishment of the Independent Electoral and
Boundaries Commission and the enactment of both the Elections Act and the Political Parties Act
introduced significant safeguards in the election process in the context of multi-party politics.
However, these safeguards remain susceptible to political manipulation.
The mandate of the National Commission on Integration and Cohesion (NCIC) has been renewed
for a further one-year, avoiding the risk of reversing the modest and fragile gains made on
cohesion and peacebuilding. Considerable concerns have been raised regarding the NCIC’s
prosecutorial powers in dealing with hate speech, propaganda and incitement of violent offences,
with heightened calls to strengthen its mandate.
The country’s transition to a devolved system of governance, coupled with the electoral
boundaries delimitation process, has contributed to new conflict threats in non-traditional election
hotspot areas. Several security-related incidents, including deaths and displacement, have
recently been recorded in various parts of the country.
Against this background, it is apparent that the upcoming general elections could lead to more
violence and population displacements. As such, there is a need for close monitoring, instituting
early warning systems in perennial and emerging conflict hotspots, and scaling-up conflict
prevention and mitigation measures pre and postelection. The Protection Sector, within the
framework of the humanitarian pillar, is developing preparedness and coordinated multi-sectoral
interventions. A survey carried out recently by the Constitution & Reform Education Consortium
has identified likely hotspots of violence in the counties in accordance with analyses of varied risk
including parts of South Rift, Coast Province, Upper Eastern and informal settlements in Nairobi,
Nakuru, Kisumu and Mombasa.
Setting up common rapid needs-assessment mechanisms and tools
The Kenya Humanitarian Partnership Team has agreed to strengthen multi-sector assessments
in sudden-onset emergencies to ensure that humanitarian actors in Kenya use common
methodologies and tools for quality and comparativeness.
OCHA is working with the Assessment Capacities Project (ACAPS), UNICEF and the Emergency
Capacity-Building Project to facilitate a consultative process to review current assessment
practices and to identify an appropriate mechanism for future multi-sector assessments. The
process is being undertaken in three phases: consultation; agreement on and implementation of
an appropriate mechanism/tool; and a consolidation/capacity-building phase.
32
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Scope of the crisis and number of people in need
The map below illustrates the number of people requiring food assistance in affected counties as
well as the refugee population in Dadaab (north-eastern Kenya), Kakuma (north-western Kenya)
and urban areas (Nairobi).
33
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
4. THE 2013 COMMON
HUMANITARIAN ACTION PLAN
Planning scenario
The planning scenario was developed around three thematic issues: conflict and insecurity;
climate change and food security; and refugee dynamics.
1. Conflict and insecurity
The March 2013 elections present opportunities and challenges. The country is expected to
witness political conflict before the general elections. The devolution of power to county level is
also likely to trigger leadership wrangles based on ethnic affinities due to competition for new
positions. In addition, political activists are likely to generate tension when citizens question the
suitability of the presidential candidates—two presidential aspirants are among four people facing
charges by the International Criminal Court for their alleged role in the 2007/2008 post-election
violence.
Moreover, the emergence of political groups, such as the Mombasa Republican Council, which is
calling for the secession of the Coast Province from Kenya, is symbolic of the underlying and
unresolved issues related to marginalization and unemployment in the region that sparked an
uprising among parts of the coastal population.
It is projected that the election period may generate violence that could affect 400,000 to 450,000
people. The figure assumes that not all of those affected will require assistance. For planning
purposes, the figure of 100,000-150,000 affected people has been proposed for election
preparedness from January to April 2013.
Additional factors, such as the pending resettlement of displaced people in Mt. Elgon and Mau
forest, will continue to generate tensions that could spark violence. The increasing number of
conflicts driven by competition for scarce resources, such as pasture and water for livestock as
witnessed in the Rift Valley, Upper Eastern and North Eastern provinces, are also likely to
generate rising numbers of displaced people. As has been witnessed, violent conflicts will
continue to assume an inter-communal dimension, thereby posing additional challenges in
peacebuilding and reconciliation efforts.
Kenya’s military role in Somalia has influenced heightened insecurity in north-eastern Kenya with
increased proliferation of arms and incursions of foreign militia across the porous Kenya-Somalia
border. Retaliatory attacks on Kenyan soil, especially in the north-east, are likely to increase,
resulting in the disruption of humanitarian operations and exacerbating the already dire
humanitarian conditions inside and outside the refugee camps.
2. Food security
The overall prognosis for the food-security situation based on climatic conditions is good, with
above-average rainfall expected for the two rainy seasons (October-December 2012 ‘short rains’
and March-May 2013 ‘long rains’). As a result, the food-insecure population is expected to
decline from 2.1 million to 1.8 million people.
34
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
However, significant threats to the food-security situation remain. Despite the decline in the price
of maize, it remains at least 45% above the five-year average, which could undermine foodsecurity improvements. Flooding during the short-rains season could also disrupt food and
livestock markets, as well as water-borne and vector-borne livestock diseases that
characteristically accompany above-average rains.
Furthermore, deteriorating security conditions during the election period in early 2013 could have
negative repercussions, with the food-insecure population possibly rising to 3 million people.
Neglect of farm operations and harvests, looting and market disruptions would tend to worsen the
food-security situation.
Recurring erratic rains, drought and increasing incidents of floods are evidence of the impact of
climate change in Kenya. Pastoral and marginal agricultural livelihoods in the ASALs are almost
completely dependent on rains to sustain their livelihoods and are therefore increasingly
vulnerable to such shocks. This has led to conflict over natural resources, including water and
pasture for livestock.
3. Refugees
The precarious situation in Somalia due to conflict and insecurity continues to generate knock-on
effects in neighbouring Kenya where approximately 470,000 refugees are hosted in the northeastern Dadaab camps. The issue of security remains a key defining factor for the refugee
operations in Dadaab. The recent military successes in Kismayo and encouraging political
developments in Somalia present yet another change in the operational context of the refugee
operation, the consequences of which are yet to be seen. However, it is anticipated that there will
be increased pressure on refugees to return home and on UNHCR and the international
community to increase delivery assistance inside Somalia, especially in the potential areas of
return, i.e. those liberated by the Kenyan Army and those that were affected by the famine in
2011.
On the other hand, there is a possibility of infiltration by Al Shabaab elements that have been
dispersed from Kismayo and the Jubas into the Dadaab camps. This may further compound the
insecurity and tensions with the host authorities. So far, however, the implementation of the
programmes in the camps has not been dramatically affected by the stand of the central
authorities due to the careful balancing of UNHCR relations with local authorities in the Dadaab
area. In this regard, the planned devolution of power into the districts in 2013 is another unknown
element that may significantly influence the refugee operation next year.
Additional variables to monitor with potential to worsen or relieve humanitarian needs
Events
Jan
General
Elections
Pre-election
period
Rains
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
General
elections
(4
March)
Long Rains Season
35
Short Rains Season
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
The humanitarian strategy and strategic objectives
Response Strategy
By the end of 2013, the overall strategy for humanitarian programming in Kenya is to transition
out of humanitarian aid. While responding to residual acute humanitarian needs in the country,
humanitarian actors will support and strengthen the preparedness of national institutions and
local responders and the development of livelihoods, and they will address social protection
needs.
The 2013 EHRP focuses on the following three strategic objectives:



The humanitarian needs of highly vulnerable people affected by natural and man-made
disasters are met through life-saving assistance.
Communities have enhanced resilience, reducing the impact of disasters, and lessened
chronic vulnerability by means of DRR and early recovery approaches.
Increased commitment by the GoK and development actors to address issues of chronic
vulnerability and provide durable solutions.
The first strategic objective addresses life-saving and core emergency assistance. To this end,
humanitarian partners have prioritized the continued provision of multi-sector assistance to
refugees and ongoing relief assistance to people most affected by recurrent shocks (most
recently the 2010-2011 Horn of Africa crisis) in the ASAL areas. In addition, partners will focus
on other vulnerable groups, including those who remain displaced due to previous elections or
inter-communal violence and those at greatest risk in urban informal settlements. Also of key
concern is preparedness for the period before and after the general elections in March 2013,
during which many parts of the country face a heightened risk of inter-communal conflict. This
includes supporting the first-line response to the humanitarian impact of localized violence and
ensuring preparedness for any potential escalation.
The second strategic objective encourages increased efforts to reinforce recovery and build
resilience to recurrent shocks through DRR and early recovery approaches. In this regard,
humanitarian partners have agreed to continue to build on previous initiatives aimed at integrating
early recovery and DRR approaches, particularly in relation to communities repeatedly affected
by climatic shocks in ASAL areas. This includes humanitarian programming initiatives that
support longer-term resilience, such as voucher schemes or cash programming, building up
livelihoods or the contribution to improved access to services. A number of platforms exist for
coordinating lessons learned from these activities, including the national DRR platform, the newly
created ASAL alliance and the Early Recovery Working Group. Similarly, partners will continue to
engage in and support initiatives that aim to mobilize consolidated programming towards
improved resilience, such as the national Ending Drought Emergencies country plan.
The third strategic area of the EHRP refers to the integration of humanitarian priorities into
national and development frameworks. It is a key component of the 2013 plan. As this is the third
and final year of the current strategy, partners have agreed on the importance of consolidating
efforts in this regard. 2013 also offers some key opportunities for partners to advocate the
integration of humanitarian priorities into national structures and development plans. This
includes the second phase of the GoK’s Mid Term Plan (MTP II under Vision 2030, the formation
of the county structures, and the implementation of new policy and legislation (such as the
recently passed IDP bill and the draft disaster response management policy). In the international
development arena, the elaboration of a new UNDAF strategy in 2013 in line with the
36
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Government’s MTP II will provide additional opportunities to link humanitarian priorities with
development plans in the coming year. Ssignificant progress has been made in this area in 2012,
but additional efforts are required to consolidate and build on progress to date. At both national
and sub-national levels, uncertainty remains over the structures and mechanisms for disaster
management. At the national level, some reorganization of Government ministries and
departments is expected following elections.
Emergency preparedness
Humanitarian partners will continue on-going contingency planning at national and sub-national
levels. This includes preparedness for floods, drought, landslides and other hazards. Of
particular importance for the early part of 2013 is the continuation of preparedness efforts for the
pre-election and election period, during which there is a heightened risk of inter-communal
conflicts in many parts of the country. Areas potentially affected include those traditionally
affected by election-related violence, plus a number of other areas where pre-existing tensions
can be exacerbated by political processes, such as the process of devolution and the competition
for election at county and national levels.
To this end, the humanitarian community has been engaged in a preparedness process being led
by the National Disaster Operations Centre. It focuses around four key areas: peace and
reconciliation, humanitarian aid, mass casualty and security. Under the humanitarian component,
the process has included a number of national and sub-national consultations. At the subnational level, preparedness is being organized around eight support hubs that aim to capitalize
on field-level analysis and provide a more detailed view of capacities on the ground. The process
is also linked to an inter-agency initiative (including the GoK, the Kenya Red Cross, and NGOs) to
develop the initial rapid assessment tool for Kenya (KIRA). KIRA is being field-tested and subnational trainings are underway in the support hubs.
Humanitarian access
The security situation in the Dadaab area and the wider North-Eastern Province moved from lowrisk and stable to high-risk and dangerous following a series of incidents, including the abduction
of aid workers and fatal attacks on refugee leaders and Kenyan security forces. This led to more
restrictive security measures that curtailed humanitarian access to the camps. African Union
military action against Al-Shabaab in Somalia and the capture of Kismayo have raised concern of
increasing extremist activity in the north-east of Kenya. Furthermore, incidents of inter-communal
conflict have also contributed to diminishing access in the region. Due to the regular occurrence
of climatic shocks and cross-border and internal insecurity, communities in the north-east require
significant assistance. Partners remain committed to finding ways to continue providing
assistance in this area despite access challenges. Because of the complex nature of the crisis in
the area, the north/east is expected to remain a priority area for humanitarian response in the
coming year and beyond. Inter-communal violence in other parts of the country, such as Tana
River and Moyale, during 2012, has also led to temporary access restrictions for some actors.
Partners remain committed to identifying solutions to secure access in these areas.
37
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Strategic objectives and indicators for 2013
Strategic objective #1
The humanitarian needs of highly vulnerable people affected by natural and manmade disasters are met through life-saving assistance and protection as per national
and international standards.
Indicators
FOOD


% of targeted men,
women, boys and girls
receiving timely
distributions (GFD).
Adequate food
consumption score
(FCS) for 80% of GFD
beneficiaries; % of
women, boys and girls
receiving timely
distributions (BSFP).
NUTRITION



Under-five mortality rate
in highly vulnerable
disaster-affected
districts.
Percentage of acute
malnourished under-five
children (boys and girls)
and pregnant or
lactating women (PLW)
accessing treatment as
per national standards.
Percentage of underfive children with global
acute malnutrition
(GAM) in highly
vulnerable disasteraffected districts.
Targets


Monitoring method
Monthly and timely relief
distributions of food or
cash to targeted
beneficiairies
80% of general food
distribution (GFD)
beneficiaries have
adequate FCS
Improvement of mortality rates
compared to 2012 baseline
rates
2012 baseline rates:

Turkana North – 1.18

Turkana South – 0.98

Turkana West – 1.18

Turkana Central – 1.27

Mandera West – 0.67

Mandera Central – 0.22

Mandera East/North –
0.8

Wajir West/North - 1.0

West Pokot-0.58

Mwingi-1.95

Isiolo-0.62

Kitui-1.07

Kwale-0.45

Laikipia-0.40


75% of severely
malnourished children
(boys and girls)
accessing treatment.
50% of moderate
malnourished children
(boys and girls) and PLW
accessing treatment.
Indicators below global
emergency thresholds for 2013
2012 baseline rates:

Turkana North – 15.3%

Turkana South – 17.1 %

Turkana West – 14.3 %
38

WFP distribution
reports.

SMART Nutrition
Surveys.
Baseline rates
measured from
January to October
2012 by nutrition
implementing partners
and the Government
measuring the
number of
under-five who died in
a a recall period of 90
days before the
survey


DHIS Routine Data.

SMART Nutrition
Surveys.
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013

Turkana Central – 11.6 %


Mandera West – 16.2 %
Mandera Central –
17.9%
Mandera East/North –
15.9%
Wajir West/North 14.6%
West Pokot-12.3%
Marsabit – 13.4%
Wajir South – 23.1%
Garbatulla surveillance14.5%
Moyale-7.4%
Mwingi-2.8%
Meru North-7.8%
Isiolo-11%
Kitui-4.7%
Kwale-9.1%
Laikipia-12.8 %














Percentage of underfive children with severe
acute
malnutrition
(SAM)
in
highly
vulnerable
disasteraffected districts.
Indicators below global
emergency thresholds for 2013
SMART
Surveys.

Kenya Weekly
Epidemiological
Bulletin.
Health and Nutrition
Sector bulletin.
Disease outbreak
reports.
Nutrition
2012 baseline rates:

Turkana North – 2.3 %

Turkana South –4.2 %

Turkana West – 2.1 %

Turkana Central –0.7 %

Mandera West – 3.5 %

Mandera Central – 3.4%

Mandera East/North –
2.2%
Wajir West/North - 2.3%
West pokot-12.3%
Marsabit – 2.7%
Wajir South – 4.6%
Garbatulla surveillance2.3%
Moyale-1.4%
Mwingi-3.4%
Meru North-1.2%
Isiolo-11%
Kajiado-0.6%
Kitui-1.1%
Kwale-2.7%
Laikipia-2.3%













HEALTH

Ensure availability of
critical life-saving surge
capacities (services,
resources and supplies)
and accessible to the
vulnerable groups
including mass casualty
victims at key strategic
locations in the arid and




Multi-partner disaster and
disease outbreak
response plans
developed.
Surge capacity
established in at least 12
at-risk locations in the
ASAL regions.
Early warning, alert and
response capacities
39


KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
semi-arid regions.

established in at least 20
of the 47 counties.
All disasters and disease
outbreaks investigated
within 48 hours.

375,000 children.
EDUCATION

Increase access to
quality education for all
school-aged boys and
girls in emergencyprone areas


REFUGEE RESPONSE: Food
Assistance and Nutrition




Food distribution lists,
regular nutrition and
health reporting
(Health Information
System), nutrition
surveys, sector
meetings, UNHCR
and partner field
monitoring.
All refugees

Regular WASH
reporting, water
distribution data,
sector meetings,
UNHCR and partner
field monitoring.


Regular nutrition and
health reporting
(Health Information
System), sector
meetings, UNHCR
and partner field
monitoring.
Quarterly refugee
health status reports
produced.
Weekly
Epidemiological
bulletin.
Monitoring reports.

Refugee monthly
All refugees have
access to safe,
adequate, portable and
clean water, and
adequate and secure
sanitation facilities; all
refugees practice best
hygiene practices.
REFUGEE RESPONSE: Health
All refugees have
access to basic health
care
Refugees’ mental wellbeing is strengthened
through psycho-social
assistance and
counselling.
All refugees





REFUGEE RESPONSE:
Protection
Ministry of Education
reports.
SitReps.
Sector Reports.
All refugees
All refugees are
provided with adequate
and appropriate food to
meet the minimum
nutritional requirements
and with nutrition
services including
integrated management
of acute malnutrition
(IMAM) to address and
reduce morbidity and
mortality rates.
REFUGEE RESPONSE: WASH


Cholera, polio, hepatitis
and measles outbreaks
controlled.
Coordination platforms
for social services
established
Over 90% of children
under 5 vaccinated
against measles and
poliomyelitis.
Health outreaches
increased by at least
50%
Functioning and
integrated early warning
and reporting systems for
diseases of epidemic
potential in all the
refugee camps.


All refugees
40
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013



statistics, regular
monthly reports on
SGBV, sector
meetings, UNHCR
and partner field
monitoring.
All refugees are legally
protected in accordance
with Kenyan and
international standards,
laws and jurisprudence.
New arrivals are
received according to
established protection
procedures and
standards.
Refugee children,
women and other
vulnerable people are
protected from SGBV
REFUGEE RESPONSE:
Education


All refugees


All refugees have
adequate appropriate
and secure shelter.
All refugee households
are provided with a
shelter kit.
Refugee response:
Level of self-reliance
and livelihoods
improved.
REFUGEE RESPONSE:
Durable solutions

Regular monthly
statistics, monthly
education updates,
sector meetings,
UNHCR and partner
field monitoring.

Regular monthly
statistics, shelter
updates, sector
meetings, UNHCR
and partner field
monitoring.

Regular monthly
statistics, sector
meetings, UNHCR
and partner field
monitoring.
All refugees of schoolgoing age have access
to quality basic
education.
Out-of-school refugee
children have access to
alternative education
programmes.
REFUGEE RESPONSE: Shelter
and NFI


All refugees

25%

3,700 refugees resettled.

Resettlement
identification,
submission, departure
tracking, Individual
case review

100% of men, women
and children in target
areas.

WASH surveys,
WASH sector
updates, partner field
monitoring.

399,412 school children.

WASH surveys,
WASH sector
updates, partner field
monitoring.
At least 3,700 refugees
are resettled in
designated resettlement
countries
WASH

Emergency-affected
populations have
access to at least 7.5
litres per person per
day of safe water for
drinking and cooking.

Number of children with
access to reliable water,
sanitation and handwashing facilities in
targeted school
institutions.
41
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Strategic objective #2
Communities have enhanced resilience, reducing the impact of disasters, and
lessened chronic vulnerability by means of DRR and early recovery approaches.
Indicators
Targets
Monitoring method

Percentage of
humanitarian
response projects that
incorporate early
recovery or DRR
components.

60% of humanitarian
response projects incorporate
early recovery and disaster
risk reduction components.

FTS and OPS data.

People and
communities become
resilient to the worst
impact of crises by
means of early
resumption of
livelihoods of people
affected by crises,
and/or strengthened
ability to maintain
their livelihoods
through crises to
mitigate its impact,
including the urban
poor.

At least 30% of disasteraffected people benefit from
livelihoods support (including
indirect benefits to household
members).

Agriculture and livestock
sector reports.

% of targeted men,
women, boys and
girls receiving timely
food distributions
(FFA).

Monthly and timely relief
distributions of food to
405,000 drought-affected
targeted beneficiaries
between the months of
September 2012 and March
2013 (100%).
80% of FFA beneficiaries
have adequate FCS.
Monthly and timely
distributions of cash and food
to 485,000 drought-affected
targeted beneficiaries
between the months of
September and March 2013
(100%).
80% of CFA beneficiaries
have adequate FCS.

Monthly distribution monitoring
of all activities. Joint
programme monitoring and
self evaluation. On-site
monitoring of progress and
quality of outputs under FFA,
distribution and beneficiary
contact monitoring for the
supplementary feeding
programme, joint programme
monitoring and selfevaluations.
Key nutrition and gender
sensitive advocacy messages
developed and shared with
community support groups
and other sectors




Adequate FCS for
FFA beneficiaries.
% of targeted men,
women, boys and
girls receiving timely
cash distributions
(CFA).



Adequate FCS for
80% of CFA
beneficiaries.

Capacity of men,
women, boys and
girls is improved to
demand and use
nutrition services

42


A three-times-per-year
Community and Household
Surveillance (CHS) survey will
provide information on food
security and nutrition situation
at critical times of the year
Nutrition sector reports.
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013




Disaster risk reduction
and early recovery
approaches
integrated within the
education sector
intervention.
Capacity development
of the education
system is
strengthened both at
national and subnational levels to
effectively respond to
education in
emergencies.

Governance
structures at national,
sub-national and
community levels
have sufficient
disaster preparedness
to reduce the impact
of crises and
response capacity to
support the early
recovery of affected
people, building on
existing knowledge,
skills and coping
mechanisms.

Adequate measures
in place to prevent
detect and control
cholera and other
water-borne diseases.







At least 80% of
communities in 10
counties engaged on
public health
education and use
essential primary
health services.



Education Sector reports.
MoE reports.
Sitreps
Kenya’s DRM Bill is passed
into law.
Support provided in facilitating
50% of counties having in
place multi-hazard
contingency plans.
Election preparedness plans
in place at national and hub
level.

Reports and updates from
GoK sectors and OCHA.
Tested cholera response
plans in place in counties
most vulnerable to
cholera/AWD.
Counties most at risk have
cholera response officers
trained and in place.
Cholera infection control
initiatives in designated health
facilities
Members respond within
agreed timeframes
(assessment within 48 hours
and response in 72 hours
after notification) to all
reported cholera outbreaks in
their county with interventions
in support of MoPHS.
95% of children under 5
vaccinated against
measles and polio in 10 out of
47 at-risk counties.
60% of women groups in
10/47 counties had at least
three health education
campaigns in the year.
80% of communities in 10/47
counties benefited from 4

Reporting from health sectors
and weekly epidemiological
reports.

District health information
systems routine data.



DRR and EPRP manuals
reviewed and introduced.
10 national and sub-national
sectors adopting DRR and
Early Recovery approaches.
3000 teachers, officials
receive training on DRR,
EPRP.



43
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013



Early warning
mechanisms, food
security information
systems and
vulnerability analysis
inform preparedness
and response at both
national and county
levels in order to
reduce negative
effects on vulnerable
groups in pastoral,
agro-pastoral and
marginal agricultural
disaster-prone areas.

Vulnerable men and
women in selected
drought-affected parts
of ASALs protect and
rebuild livestock
assets through
livestock disease
surveillance and
control, restocking
and destocking,
fodder production,
rangeland
rehabilitation and
training on issues
related to resilience.













Vulnerable smallscale female and
male farmers in
marginal agricultural
areas sustainably
improve their
agricultural production
by use of quality and
suitable farm inputs
and greater capacity
to use improved
production
technologies.




outreach services in the year.
Zero stock out of contingency
stockpiles in 12 locations.
Four early warning and food
security information
assessments conducted and
reported.
80% of targeted districts to
use Integrated Phase
Classification (IPC).
50 Government and NGO
staff trained on IPC.

Short and Long Rains
Assessments data, other field
data and reports.
Three million animals
vaccinated and treated.
1,500 acres of land put under
fodder.
Four disease surveillance
missions conducted and
reports on disease outbreaks.
Six service providers
(partners) adopting mobile
phone technology for
reporting.
500 (disaggregated by
gender) livestock keepers
feeding into rumour register.
30 inter-community peace
negotiations conducted to
improve access to grazing
and water.
10,000 animals provided.
2,000 households restocked.
2,000 animals destocked.
40 livestock markets with
improved infrastructure and
remaining functional during
dry period.

Field visit and reports.
2.000 MTs of various
improved drought-tolerant
crop seeds distributed to men,
women and other vulnerable
groups.
Over 10,000 MTs of various
drought-tolerant crops valued
at $2.9 million produced.
10,000 women and men
trained on improved
production technologies and
using improved storage
facilities.
1,000 MTs of seeds of various
improved drought-tolerant

Monthly distribution monitoring
of all activities. Joint
programme monitoring and
self evaluation. On-site
monitoring of progress and
quality of outputs under FFA,
distribution and beneficiary
contact monitoring for the
SuFP, joint programme
monitoring and self
evaluations.
44
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
crop varieties produced
through community-based
seed bulking systems.

Vulnerable men,
women and children
in pastoral, agropastoral and marginal
agricultural areas
become more resilient
through climate
change adaptation
and DRR approaches.

10,000 acres under soil and
water conservation.
50 water harvesting structures
constructed.
10,000 households practicing
small-scale irrigation and
10,000 acres put under smallscale irrigation.
5,000 acres of rangeland
rehabilitated

Monthly distribution monitoring
of all activities. Joint
programme monitoring and
self evaluation. On-site
monitoring of progress and
quality of outputs under FFA,
distribution and beneficiary
contact monitoring for the
SuFP, joint programme
monitoring and self
evaluations.

% of water supply
projects in
emergency-prone
areas with trained
community water
management
structures.

100% of water supply projects

WASH surveys, WASH sector
updates, partner field
monitoring.

Government
structures at national
and sub-national
level, WASH officers
have strengthened
capacity for disaster
preparedness and
contingency planning
for effective
coordination of
emergency WASH
interventions.

At least 200 WESCOORD
officers.

WASH sector updates, training
reports.

Proportion of health
and education
institutions with
WASH facilities that
provide options for
rainwater harvesting
and storage.

60% of facilities installed in
institutions in target areas.

WASH sector reports.



45
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Strategic objective #3
Increased commitment on the part of the Government of Kenya and development actors to
address issues of chronic vulnerability and provide durable solutions.
Indicators

Humanitarian principles
and priorities reflected in
national
and
development initiatives.
Targets




Monitoring method
Humanitarian and disaster
management
priorities
reflected in MTP II and
Vision 2030.
Support
provided
in
implementation of Ending
Drought
Emergencies
Country Plan.
County level coordination
mechanisms
established
with
engagement
from
humanitarian partners.
DRR priorities reflected in
development of new UNDAF
(2014-2018).



Reports
from
county
planning and budgeting
processes.
Strategic plans.
MTP II and UNDAF GoK
/UN sector reports.
Criteria for selection and prioritization of projects
Selection criteria








The project is consistent with the sector strategy and priorities and contributes towards
the attainment of one or more of the overall strategic priorities.
The project is based on needs-assessment outcomes.
The project presents a clear target in the specified operational areas and does not
duplicate activities implemented by other organizations.
The implementing agency has a recognized capacity to implement the project and
participates in existing coordination structures.
The project is cost-effective in terms of the number of beneficiaries and the needs to
which it responds.
The project includes a clear monitoring and evaluation plan for quality control and
reporting.
The project is designed to reflect the different needs and concerns of men, women, girls
and boys, and this is reflected in the achievement of gender code 1, 2a or 2b.
The project reflects relevant cross-cutting concerns (age, disability, gender, GBV,
protection from sexual exploitation and abuse / PSEA, HIV/AIDS and early recovery).
Prioritization criteria



Projects identified as “high” priority have been reviewed and assessed as meeting one of
the following criteria:
The needs to which the project responds have been identified by the sector as highest
priority.
The project is life-saving in nature.
46
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Sector response plans
Agriculture and Livestock
Sector lead agency
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
Funds required
$25,920,776 for 18 projects
Contact information
Robert Allport : Robert.Allport@fao.org
Paul Omanga (Paul.Omanga@fao.org)
Jordan Ramacciato (Jordan.Ramacciato@fao.org)
Beneficiaries targeted in sector’s
EHRP projects (end-year target)
Number of people in need
Food and livelihood
insecurity
Category of
people in
need
Total
Female
Male
Total
Male
Election
violence
Floods
Female
ASAL areas
1,250,000
850,000
300,000
100,000
2,500,000
700,000
300,000
1,000,000
Urban
vulnerable
800,000
500,000
200,000
30,000
1,530,000
412,000
200,000
612,000
Vulnerable in
medium /
high rainfall
areas
300,000
150,000
80,000
30,000
560,000
140,000
84,000
224,000
Totals
2,350,000
1,500,000
580,000
160,000
4,590,000
1,252,000
584,000
1,836,000
Explanation of number of beneficiaries targeted
The Long Rains Assessment of August 2012 revealed that the impact of the drought is still felt. It
estimated that more than 2.1 million people require assistance in Kenya’s ASALs and some 1.3
million in urban areas. More than 450,000 people will need assistance in medium- and highrainfall areas.
In addition, some 160,000 people who depend on agriculture and livestock remain at risk in floodprone areas around the country. Furthermore, the GoK, the UN and partners are preparing
contingency plans and scenarios in case of violence and unrest leading up to and after the March
2013 elections. An estimated 580,000 vulnerable people could be affected, with serious
disruptions to agriculture, livestock and the food supply.
Overall, partners in the agriculture and livestock sector seek resources to target 1.8 million of the
most vulnerable beneficiaries whose livelihoods are at risk, or some 40 per cent of the most
vulnerable people in need.
How the sector response plan will contribute to the strategic objectives
The Agriculture and Livestock Sector response plan focuses on restoring and protecting the
livelihoods of affected people. In agropastoral areas, the plan integrates emergency and
development approaches. Under emergency approaches, the sector will meet immediate needs
through seed distribution, livestock treatment, provision of livestock feed, livestock vaccinations
and voucher-for-work activities. The livestock interventions will adhere as closely as possible to
47
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
the well-established Livestock Emergency Guidelines and Standards (LEGS). Regarding
medium- and long-term resilience-building, the sector will continue to develop water-harvesting
structures for humans, livestock and irrigation; soil and water conservation activities; rehabilitation
of small-scale community-based irrigation schemes; community-based seed production;
rangeland management; pasture production; and early warning information collection, analysis
and dissemination.
Sector objectives and output targets
Strategic objective #2
Communities have enhanced resilience, reducing the impact of disasters, and lessened chronic
vulnerability by means of DRR and early recovery approaches.
Sector objective 1
Strengthen the development of early warning mechanisms, food security information systems and
vulnerability analysis to inform preparedness and response at national and county levels to
reduce negative effects on men, women, children and other vulnerable groups in pastoral,
agropastoral and marginal agricultural disaster-prone areas.
Output: Regular updates on humanitarian situation
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of early warning, food security and livelihood assessments conducted
4
Output: Improved availability and analysis of early warning and food security information to facilitate
decision making
Output Indicator
2013 target
Percentage of targeted districts using Integrated Phase Classification (IPC)
80
Number of Government and NGO staff trained on IPC
50
Output: Early warning system and food security information in place and functional
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of early warning and food security information reports disseminated
4
Sector objective 2
Support vulnerable men and women in selected drought-affected parts of ASALs to protect and
rebuild livestock assets through livestock-disease surveillance and control, restocking and
destocking, fodder production, rangeland rehabilitation and training on resilience-related issues.
Output: Regular and participatory livestock-disease surveillance
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of disease surveillance missions conducted and reports on disease
outbreaks
4
Number of service providers (partners) adopting mobile phone technology for
reporting
6
48
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output: Rapid response mechanism to disease control in place and functional
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of livestock keepers feeding into rumour register (segregated by
gender).
500
Number of animals vaccinated and treated
Three million
Output: Improved availability of fodder and pasture
Output Indicator
2013 target
Area (acres) under fodder production
1,500
Output: Communities sensitized and mobilized in addressing natural resource management issues
Output Indicator
2013 target
Inter-community peace negotiations conducted to improve access to grazing
and water
30
Output: Selective restocking/destocking of vulnerable households
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of animals provided
10,000
Number of households restocked
2,000
Number animals destocked
2,000
Output: Improvement, functionality and sustainability of livestock markets supported through comanagement approach
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of livestock markets with improved infrastructure
40
Number of markets remaining functional throughout dry period
40
Sector objective 3
Facilitate vulnerable small-scale female and male farmers in marginal agriculture areas to
sustainably improve their agricultural production by providing quality and suitable farm inputs and
building their capacities to use improved production technologies.
Output: Vulnerable households receive suitable and adapted drought-tolerant crop seeds
Output Indicator
2013 target
Amount (MT) and value (Ksh) of various drought-tolerant seeds distributed to
men, women and other vulnerable groups
600 MTs valued at 75 million
Ksh ($0.9 million)
Amount (MT) and value (Ksh) of crops produced
10,000 MTs valued at 300
million Ksh ($3.5 million)
49
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output: Training on improved dry land crop production technologies and diversification
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of people trained
3,000 women and 2,000 men
(inclusive of youth)
Types of trainings to be conducted
10
Number of trainings to be conducted
To be determined depending on
geographical coverage
Output: Capacity building on post-harvest handling, storage and linkages to markets
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of women and men trained on post-harvest handling and using
improved storage facilities
3,000 women and 2,000 men
(inclusive of the youth)
Number of local metal silo artisans trained on metal silo technology
segregated by gender
30
Number of extension agents trained on detection, control and reporting of
maize-lethal necrosis disease
100
Number of maize-lethal necrosis disease surveillance missions conducted
20
Output: Promotion of community-based seed bulking to ensure seed resilience
Output Indicator
2013 target
Types of improved drought-tolerant crop varieties identified for seed
production through community-based seed bulking systems
10
Amount (MT) of seeds of various improved drought-tolerant crops produced
through community-based seed bulking systems
100 MTs
Number of farmers trained and participating in community-based seed bulking
500
Sector objective 4
Increase resilience of vulnerable men, women and children in pastoral, agropastoral and marginal
agricultural areas through climate change adaptation and DRR approaches.
Output: Soil / water conservation and water-harvesting structures established
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of farmers that have conserved at least 0.5 acres of their farms
through terracing/or other soil and water conservation structures
5,000
Area (acres) under soil and water conservation
2,500
Number of water harvesting structures (sand dams, open pans, dams)
established
20
Output: Promotion of conservation agriculture
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of types of trainings conducted on CA
10
Number of people trained
500
Area (acres) under conservation agriculture
1,500
50
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output: Promotion of small-scale irrigation
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of people practicing small-scale irrigation
5,000
Area under small-scale irrigation
1,500
Number of small-scale irrigation schemes rehabilitated
10
Top-priority actions, beneficiaries and locations
Agriculture
The poor performance of the 2012 long rains resulted in the second to third successive poor or
failed season in many parts of the south-eastern and coastal marginal agricultural zone.
Households who currently have less disposable income, or who are unable to invest in livelihood
activities, may need support to access quality inputs and enhance their harvest prospects. The
priority actions that may be considered in 2013 are as follows:
Action
Locations (Districts)
Provision of certified seed and fertilizers, and
promotion of high-value traditional crops
Tana River, Wajir, Ijara, Isiolo, Turkana, Samburu,
Marsabit, Moyale, Meru North, Kitui, Mwingi, Makueni,
Mbeere, Tharaka
Moyale, Garissa, Ijara, Wajir, Samburu, Kieni, Laikipia,
Koibatek, Kitui, Makueni, Mbeere, Tharaka
Promotion of water harvesting for irrigation activities
and supporting the establishment of green houses
Activities aimed at soil fertility improvement and soil
conservation
Machakos, Mbeere, Baringo
Promotion of appropriate post-harvest management
techniques
Meru North, Kieni, Makueni, Kitui, Mwingi, Machakos,
Mbeere, Tharaka, Tana River
Livestock
The availability of pasture has been sustained since the end of the 2011 short-rains season in
many pastoral areas. However, livestock trekking distances are increasing. There is also a need
for enhanced disease surveillance, because increased livestock movements and concentrations
near water points predispose them to contagious diseases. In addition, likely enhanced rains
may precipitate outbreaks of vectorborne diseases such as Rift Valley Fever. The following are
the main interventions to harness the advantages of expected above-average 2012 OctoberDecember short rains so as to enhance households’ resilience.
Action
Locations (Districts)
Inter-community peace negotiations for improved
access to grazing and water.
Livestock-disease surveillance, treatment and
vaccinations.
Isiolo, Turkana, Samburu, Marsabit
Pasture and fodder crop establishment and
conservation, and livestock feed supplementation
Restocking and upgrading of livestock
Tana River, Wajir, Ijara, Isiolo, Turkana, Samburu,
Marsabit, Moyale, Meru North, Kitui, Mwingi, Makueni,
Mbeere, Tharaka, Kieni, Koibatek, Laikipia, Kajiado,
Baringo.
Isiolo, Garissa, Ijara, Mandera, Samburu, Turkana,
Kieni, Laikipia, West Pokot, Kitui, Machakos, Mwingi,
Mbeere, Meru North, Malindi, Kwale, Taita Taveta.
Samburu, Turkana, Moyale, Marsabit, Kieni, west
Pokot, Meru North, Tharaka, Makueni, Kitui and
Mwingi
51
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Table of proposed coverage per location
Geographic
Location
AGRICULTURE AND LIVESTOCK
State
North-eastern:
Marsabit, Moyale,
Garrissa, Turkana,
Ijara, Isiolo, Mandera,
Garbatula, Tana
River
Eastern and coastal
marginal agricultural
areas: Machakos,
Mwingi, Mbeere,
Makueni, Kitui,
Kwale, Tharaka
Rift Valley
VSF Germany, IOM, FAO, VSF Swiss, Christian
Aid, COOPI, ACTED
TOTAL:
7
Zinduka Afrika, FAO, ACF, Christian Aid,
ADRA, VSF Germany, ACTED, Vetworks EA
TOTAL:
8
OXFAM, FAO
TOTAL:
2
52
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Coordination
Sector lead agency
OCHA
in support of the Ministry of State for Special Programmes, National Drought
Management Authority and technical sectors and National Disaster Operations
Centre
Funds required
$4,032,356 for 5 projects
Contact information
Gabriella Waaijman (waaijman@un.org
Patrick Lavand’Homme (lavandhomme@un.org)
Beneficiaries targeted in sector’s EHRP
projects (end-year target)
Number of people in need
Category of
people in need
Drought-affected
Refugees
Totals
Female
1,134,000
Male
966,000
333,525
340,263
1,467,525
1,306,263
Total
Female
Male
Total
2,100,000
1,134,000
966,000
2,100,000
673,788
333,525
340,263
673,788
1,467,525
1,306,263
2,773,788
2,773,788
Explanation of number of beneficiaries targeted
In 2013, humanitarian coordination will continue to focus on people affected by recurrent drought
in the ASAL areas, refugee populations and host communities, and other affected people
including those currently and potentially affected by inter-communal conflict, and those who are
highly vulnerable to shocks in urban areas.
In the coming year, specific priority will be given to continued response to people most affected
by drought in the ASAL areas, particularly those affected by additional shocks such as intercommunal conflict, insecurity and floods. In this regard, North-Eastern Province is of particular
concern due to the profound impact of drought, inter-communal conflict, reduced access due to
extremist violence and poor infrastructure, as well as the long-term and increased presence of
refugees from Somalia. Assistance for refugees and programming in host communities will also
remain a priority.
In relation to preparedness for upcoming elections, 100,000-150,000 people could potentially
require some form of humanitarian aid in the pre-election and election period between January
and April 2013.
How the sector response plan will contribute to the strategic objectives
The sector response plan aims to support all three strategic objectives. In particular, the first
strategic objective area will be supported by the continued management and reinforcement of
humanitarian preparedness and response activities. The priority emphasis is continued response
to disaster-affected people in the ASALs and refugee populations. In terms of preparedness
activity, particular focus will remain on communities at high risk of inter-communal conflict in the
pre-election and election period and the impacts of recurrent climatic shocks.
In relation to the second priority related to building resilience, coordination will continue to focus
on integrated efforts towards early recovery and disaster risk reduction. This will build primarily
53
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
on existing achievements and mechanisms, such as the Disaster Risk Reduction Platform, the
District/County Steering Group, the Ending Drought Emergencies country programme and the
outcome of the Post-Disaster Needs Assessment. This area will also focus on the continued
provision of technical support for mainstreaming early recovery approaches and for announcing
the National Disaster Management Policy.
The third priority area focuses on the integration of humanitarian response issues in national and
development frameworks. This is of key importance in 2013. Given the stabilization and
improvement in the humanitarian situation in the country over the last year, it is envisaged that in
the absence of a new large-scale disaster, there will be a reduction in consolidated humanitarian
programming towards the end of 2013, with the exception of the refugee response and response
in north-eastern Kenya. Therefore, it is vital that the humanitarian community works with national
and development actors to ensure that key humanitarian response and disaster management
issues are integrated into relevant development policies and frameworks. Key opportunities and
entry points have been identified, including the second phase of the national Mid-Term Plan
under the Government’s Vision 2030, the recent formation of the National Drought Management
Authority, the planning for the new UNDAF, the formation of the counties, the Ending Drought
Emergencies country plan and the drafted National Disaster Management Policy.
Safety and security of humanitarian personnel
Due to the volatile security situation in the North-Eastern Province (NEP), humanitarian
organizations operating in the area will likely continue to face elevated security risks for their
personnel in the foreseeable future. In addition, humanitarian organizations are preparing for a
response to potential election-related violence. To provide the necessary security support for
these operations, UNDSS will require resources to upgrade the Emergency Communications
System. It will also require personnel to be permanently deployed to the NEP and temporary staff
for elections-related security support.
Sector objectives and output targets
Strategic objective #1
The humanitarian needs of highly vulnerable people affected by natural and man-made disasters
are met through life-saving assistance and protection as per national and international standards.
Sector objective 1.1
Timely, effective and principled humanitarian action supported and mobilized
Output: Coordinated needs based assistance provided in response to on-going and new emergencies
Output Indicator
2013 target
Coordination mechanisms maintained and adjusted
as needed
Humanitarian country team, inter-sector working group and
Humanitarian sectors maintain activities in line with terms
of reference to provide coordinated support to
emergencies.
Plans in place for coordination beyond phase out of
partner support
Dormant sectors activated when and if appropriate
Preparedness plans in place for key hazards
including floods and election related conflict
Floods CP updated in line with climatic outlook information
Elections CP in place at national level and at sub-national
level for high risk areas.
54
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output Indicator
2013 target
Strengthened coordination at sub national level and
improved linkage between sub national and national
coordination
Sub national coordination arrangements agreed for high
risk areas, including county level coordination
arrangements
Sufficient and timely resources mobilised for
humanitarian action
CERF requests supported and approved in the event of a
new emergency
ERF funds disbursed to support rapid response and to
address key response gaps
Greater equity of funding between sectors
Humanitarian preparedness and response activities
are facilitated through the provision of common
services
Appropriate security arrangements in place to facilitate
coordination in the hubs during the pre-election period and
to facilitate access in North Eastern Province
Output: Ensure timely dissemination of early warning and needs assessment information to ensure early
action
Output Indicator
2013 target
Multi-sector rapid assessments undertaken in
response to new sudden-onset emergencies.
Rapid initial assessments undertaken within 2 weeks of
any new sudden onset emergency requiring an interagency response
Support to short rains and long rains multi-sector
assessment lead by NDMA provide timely
information on food security changes in ASALs
Two assessments done and results disseminated
Early warning information disseminated to key
response actors and decision makers in a timely
fashion
Key decision-makers receive timely and relevant
information. Decision-makers respond to and on the basis
of early action and needs assessment information
One mid-season assessment carried over in case of early
indication of abnormal rain
Output: Improved integration of cross-cutting issues into humanitarian response
Output Indicator
2013 target
Cross-cutting issues reflected in preparedness and
response plans
75% response plans reviewed to ensure incorporation of
gender, GBV, PSEA, HIV/AIDS, age and disability
Improved integration of cross-cutting issues into
humanitarian reporting
Reports developed using KIRA mechanism highlight cross
cutting issues
Use of age and disaggregated data in EHRP mid -year
review reporting, in 75% of sectors
Improved capacity of sectors at national and subnational level for integration of gender, PSEA, GBV,
HIV/AIDS, age and disability into humanitarian
plans and programmes
Trainings provided at sub national and national level in at
least three thematic areas
Strategic objective #2
Communities have enhanced resilience, reducing the impact of disasters, and lessened chronic
vulnerability by means of DRR and early recovery approaches.
Sector objective 2.1
Early recovery and disaster risk reduction approaches integrated within humanitarian
preparedness and response plans
55
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output: Multi-hazard contingency and preparedness planning supported at sub-national level
Output Indicator
2013 target
Support provided to the NDMA and MoSSP to
ensure appropriate district and county level
contingency plans are in place
50% of priority counties have updated contingency plans in
place
Hazard specific plans in place at hub level for
floods and election preparedness
Floods contingency plan reviewed and updated in advance of
long and short rains
Election contingency plans in place for all humanitarian support
hubs
Output: Coordination structures continue to promote and integrate DRR and early recovery in
humanitarian preparedness and response.
Output Indicator
2013 target
Relevant forums continue to support
integration of DRR and early recovery and to
highlight best practices
Technical support provided for the integration of DRR and early
recovery into humanitarian preparedness and response
planning through the cross-cutting issues group
Continued engagement by humanitarian partners in the National
Disaster Risk Reduction platform
Partnerships
Support provided for the Ending Drought Emergencies country
plan
Strategic objective #3
Increased commitment on the part of the GoK and development actors to address issues of
chronic vulnerability and provide durable solutions.
Sector objective 3.1
Improved integration of humanitarian priorities in development frameworks
Output: Humanitarian priorities are integrated in upcoming development plans
Output Indicator
2013 target
Humanitarian priorities integrated into the concept notes and
national plans under the second phase of the Mid Term Plan
(MTPII) under the Government’s vision 2030
Humanitarian priorities in at least four sectoral
areas reflected in MTP II
Priorities related to humanitarian response and disaster risk
reduction reflected in planning for the 2014-2019 UNDAF
Planning for UNDAF includes input of
humanitarian partners
Output: Advocacy and support provided for the implementation of relevant national policy and disaster
management mechanisms
Output Indicator
2013 target
Disaster Response Management policy adopted
Pending DRM policy adopted and partners
provide support for implementation
Engage with county level structures to ensure partnership and
support for disaster management at sub nation level
Mapping of county level coordination
mechanisms and who is doing what where in
place
56
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Top-priority actions, beneficiaries, and locations
Actions:
Of key priority in 2013 is preparedness for the upcoming general elections and ensuring sufficient
capacity is in place to support the first line response to any humanitarian effects inter-communal
conflict in the pre-election and election period. Also of key importance is continued multi-sector
programming aligned with government of Kenya programming for those who continue to be
affected by drought in the ASAL regions and particularly in the north east of the country where
insecurity is a key concern. Continued assistance for refugees also remains a priority area of
intervention.
Beneficiaries:
 664,000 refugees and host communities.
 2.1 million people in arid and semi-arid areas affected by food and livelihoods insecurity.
 An estimated 100,000 to 150,000 who could potentially require assistance as the result of
inter-communal conflict in the run up and surrounding elections between January and
April 2013.

 Locations:
 ASAL areas (northern Rift Valley Province, Eastern Province, North Eastern Province,
Coast) and province suffering from cumulative effects of drought and livelihood crisis.
 Urban informal settlements including in Nairobi, Mombasa where communities remain
highly vulnerable to shocks.
 Southern areas of Rift Valley Province, Western, Nyanza, Upper Eastern, North Eastern,
and Coast
Table of proposed coverage per location
Geographic
Location
ASAL areas of
Coast, North
Easter, Eastern
and Rift Valley
provinces
Residual PEV
IDPs, and Mau
evictees
Non-ASAL
areas of Rift
Valley, Nyanza
and Western
Urban informal
settlements
COORDINATION
National Drought Management Authority, local authorities at provincial,
county and district levels, District Steering Groups, UN agencies and NGOs
Ministry of State for Special Programmes, local authorities, UN agencies and
NGOs
Local authorities at provincial, county and district levels, Disaster
Management Committees, UN agencies, NGOs
Ministry of State for Special Programmes, National Disaster Operations
Centre, Urban Vulnerability Forum, UN agencies, NGOs
57
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Education
Sector lead agency
Save the children and UNICEF/Ministry of Education
Funds required
$4,150,267 for 5 projects
Contact information
Sajjad Ismail (sismail@unicef.org)
People in need and target beneficiaries
Beneficiaries targeted in sector’s CAP
projects (end-year target)
Number of people in need
Category of
people in need
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
233,680
274,320
508,000
138,000
162,000
300,000
Children in
flood-prone
areas
10,780
11,220
22,000
9,800
10,200
20,000
Children in
election
violence prone
areas including
urban informal
settlements
31,850
33,150
65,000
26,950
28,050
55,000
276,310
318,690
595,000
174,750
200,250
375,000
Children in
drought-prone
areas
Totals
Explanation of number of beneficiaries targeted
The above numbers are arrived at by the following calculations:



Children targeted for continued support in drought-affected areas – 300,000
Estimated # of target children that might be affected by floods – 20,000
Estimated # of target children that might be affected by election violence – 55,000
The target number of children from drought-affected areas has been lowered from previous
figures. The estimated number of children prone to election violence and floods are derived from
OCHA estimations based on the most likely scenario.
How the sector response plan will contribute to the strategic objectives
The sector response plan will contribute to the strategic objectives as follows:






Expanded school feeding programme to reach all children affected by the various
emergencies;
Extension of coordination mechanism to hubs through sector system;
Assessments: the education sector will continue to conduct assessments of the impact of
the emergency on education, schools and children to enable targeted and strategic
follow-up of identified needs;
Provision of educational supplies: temporary classrooms (tents) and teaching/learning
materials including education kits and recreational kits;
Provision of water and sanitation facilities in schools;
Capacity Development: the Education Sector emergency group will continue to support
the coordination of the emergency response and the monitoring and evaluation of the
interventions through existing national coordination mechanisms. It will also provide
58
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013


capacity building training for national and district level education officers on education in
emergencies, EPRP and DRR;
Peacebuilding Education;
Advocacy: the Education Sector will advocate among key stakeholders to ensure that
children’s right to education during the emergencies are fulfilled.
Sector objectives and output targets
Strategic objective #1
The humanitarian needs of highly vulnerable populations affected by natural and man-made
disasters are met through life-saving assistance and protection as per national and international
standards.
Sector objective 1
Enhanced access to and provision of quality education for all school age boys and girls in
emergency hit areas
Output: Increase retention of children during emergencies
Output Indicator
2013 target
# of children continue their education in drought-affected areas
300,000
# of children from flood / violence affected families have access to quality
education
75,000
Output: Training of teachers on pedagogy and child-centred teaching methodologies
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of teachers trained in pedagogy and child-centred teaching
techniques
3000
Output: School supplies provided in affected areas
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of pupils benefiting from school supplies in affected areas
375,000
Output: Expand emergency school feeding in emergency affected areas
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of pupils benefiting from emergency school feeding
375,000
59
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Strategic objective #2
Communities have enhanced resilience, reducing the impact of disasters and lessened chronic
vulnerability means of DRR and early recovery approaches
Sector objective 2
Enhanced preparedness and resilience at the national and sub-national levels to reduce the
impact of disasters in the education sector.
Output: School safety promoted as a key part of child friendly schools.
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of schools benefiting from safety promoting activities
1000
Number of pupils benefiting from safety promoting activities
375,000
Number of schools with emergency response plans
1,000
Output: Provide psycho-social support to teachers and children.
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of teachers trained on psycho-social skills
3,000
Number of children benefiting from the psycho-social programmes
375,000
Output: Promote resilience within the education sector
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of teachers trained on life skills, EPRP, DRR
3,000
Number of peacebuilding events conducted
1,000
Strategic objective #3
Increased commitment on the part of the GoK and development actors to address issues of
chronic vulnerability and provide durable solutions
Sector objective 3
Increased commitment, coordination and response by GoK and development actors in
addressing Education in Emergencies.
Output: Data on impact of emergency on education collected, analysed and shared
Output Indicator
2013 target
Assessments carried out and reports disseminated
For all emergency situations
Records of national and sub-national sector meetings
Monthly meetings conducted;
sub-national sectors at required
districts activated.
60
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output: Strengthened capacity of MoE officials to respond to emergencies.
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of DEO and sub-national level stakeholders trained on Education in
Emergencies
500
Number of sub-national level stakeholders trained on EPRP
500
Number of counties where sub-national sectors are rolled out
10
Top-priority actions, beneficiaries, and locations
Priority Actions
Location
Resources
Rapid assessment on children affected by
the floods (disaggregated by gender); and
education facilities and learning materials
Tana River/ Coast/ NEP/
Western
Eastern, N/Eastern, Coast,
Western, R/Valley, Nyanza,
ASAL Districts.
Technical guidelines and
resource people from MoE
and partners available
Provide children school feeding
Tana River/ coast/ NEP/ Western
Eastern, N/Eastern, Coast,
western, R/Valley, Nyanza ASAL
Districts.
GOK- KSH.200 million ($2.3
million) budgeted for various
kinds of emergencies
affecting schools. However,
this is not sufficient
Provision of temporary learning spaces and
teaching/learning materials
Tana River/ Coast/ NEP/
Western
Eastern, N/Eastern, Coast,
Western, R/Valley, Nyanza,
ASAL Districts.
Partners and MoE to work
together to position supplies.
Funds needed
Provide WASH facilities in schools
Tana River/ Coast/ NEP/
Western
Eastern, N/Eastern, Coast,
Western, R/Valley, Nyanza,
ASAL Districts.
Available resources –
GoK / MoE/ MoSSP
Capacity Building of DEOs and partners in
Education in Emergencies
Tana River/ Coast/ NEP/
Western
Eastern, N/Eastern, Coast,
Western, R/Valley, Nyanza,
ASAL districts
MoE and UNICEF have
resources available
(Currently there are 800,000 million pupils
with mid-day meal)
Table of proposed coverage per location
Geographic
Location
Coast, North Eastern,
Upper Eastern,
Western and Nyanza
ASAL and Informal
Settlements
North Eastern
EDUCATION
UNICEF
TOTAL:
1
WFP
TOTAL:
1
PISP, SC, MURDO
TOTAL:
3
61
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Food Assistance
Sector lead agency
WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME (WFP)
Funds required
$136,120,596 for 2 projects
Contact information
KORYUN ALAVERDYAN (Koryun.alaverdyan@wfp.org
People in need and target beneficiaries
Number of people in need
Category of
people in need
Female
GFD
653,000
FFA
219,000
187,000
CFA
262,000
1,134,000
Totals
Male
Beneficiaries targeted in sector’s
CAP projects (end-year target)
Total
Female
Male
Total
1,209,000
589,000
501,000
1,090,000
406,000
219,000
187,000
406,000
223,000
485,000
262,000
223,000
485,000
966,000
2,100,000
1,070,000
911,000
1,981,000
556,000
Explanation of number of beneficiaries targeted
The number of affected beneficiaries is based on Government-led biannual assessments
conducted by the Kenya Food Security Steering Group after the long- and short-rains seasons.
The assessments determine the vulnerability levels and affected people eligible for food
assistance, after which the Government and WFP agree on a division of labour. The highest
number of people expected to be affected/targeted in 2013 is based on the results of the 2012
long-rains assessment announced in September (covering October 2012 to March 2013). Given
the positive forecast of enhanced rainfall in the 2012 short-rains season, it is expected that the
number of drought-recovery households will reduce substantially.
The above-mentioned 2.1 million (affected) people and 1.98 million (targeted) people does not
include contingency for pre- or post-election violence. In case of violence and displacement on a
scale that requires interventions, humanitarian agencies in the sector will revise their 2013 needs
upwards based on the number of people affected and targeted.
How the sector response plan will contribute to the strategic objectives
The Food Assistance Sector response plan will contribute to the three strategic objectives.
Firstly, GFDs are expected to provide food to the most affected vulnerable households in the
ASALs during crises and lean periods. GFD will be used where asset-creation activities are not
appropriate or not yet under way, and where links with other safety nets are critical to protecting
livelihoods and addressing malnutrition. GFD will be reduced gradually over time, integrating
emergency responses into early and extended recovery plans and safety nets such as HSNP,
which is providing unconditional cash transfers.
Secondly, under F/CFA, WFP will assist households and communities to improve their livelihood
systems and address some of the DRR issues. Interventions will focus mainly on: i) improving
access to water through water harvesting and management; ii) promoting dry-land agro forestry
and fodder production, particularly where there are pastoralists; and iii) rehabilitating irrigation
systems and degraded lands to enhance food, fodder and tree crops, complementing partners’
efforts to assist agropastoralists and marginal farmers. Whereas WFP-specific projects will be in
62
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
most of the ASAL areas, the three Rome-based agencies will implement joint programmes in
Garissa, Mwingi and Turkana.
The sector will continue supporting the Government to improve early warning surveillance
systems and analysis, and contribute to the production of a monthly food security and nutrition
bulletin. Early warning information will feed into and enhance response mechanisms during
emergencies, along with resilience-building plans that reduce the need for emergency
interventions. Reducing risks at the community level is part of preparedness activities under
C/FFA.
Sector objectives and output targets
Strategic objective #1
The humanitarian needs of highly vulnerable people affected by natural and man-made disasters
are met through life-saving assistance and protection as per national and international standards.
Sector objective 1
Assist emergency-affected households in reducing the impacts of shocks by addressing their food
needs.
Output 1.1: Food and non-food items distributed in sufficient quantity and quality to targeted
beneficiaries under secure conditions.
Output Indicator
2013 target
Numbers of women, girls and boys receiving food, by category and as % of planned.
100%
Tonnage of food distributed, by type and as % of planned
100%
Household food consumption score (% of households with acceptable food
consumption).
80%
Strategic objective #2
Communities have enhanced resilience, reducing the impact of disasters, and lessened chronic
vulnerability by means of DRR and early recovery approaches.
Sector objective 2
Enhance communities’ resilience to shocks through asset creation, and increase government
capacity to design and manage disaster-preparedness and risk-reduction programmes.
Output 2.1: Disaster mitigation measures in place with WFP capacitydevelopment support
2013 target
Output Indicator
Risk-reduction and disaster preparedness and mitigation systems in place, by type:
early-warning systems and contingency plans
63
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output 2.2: Food, cash and non-food items distributed in sufficient quantity and quality to targeted
beneficiaries
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of men, women, girls and boys receiving food, as % of planned
475,000
Tonnage of food distributed, as % of planned
100%
Total cash/vouchers value (US$) distributed, as % of planned
$26,981,680
Output 2.3: Disaster mitigation assets built or restored by targeted
communities
Output Indicator
2013 target
Risk-reduction and disaster-mitigation assets created or restored, by type and unit
of measure
See under output 2.4
Output 2.4: Support and re-establish livelihoods and food security after shocks
Output Indicator
2013 target
Hectares (ha) of agricultural land benefiting from rehabilitated irrigation schemes
(including irrigation canal repair, specific protection measures, embankments etc)
350 ha
Hectares (ha) of cultivated land treated and conserved with physical soil and water
conservation measures only
5,040 ha
Hectares (ha) of gully land reclaimed as a result of check dams and gully
rehabilitation structures
3,150 ha
Kilometre (km) of feeder roads rehabilitated (FFA) and maintained (self-help)
150 km
Number of assisted communities with improved physical infrastructures to mitigate
the impact or shocks in place as a result of project assistance
650
Number of community water points for livestock uses constructed (3000-15.000
cbmt)
70
Number of fish ponds constructed (FFA) and maintained (self-help)
18
Number of shallow wells constructed
15
Number of trees seedlings produced
351,000
Sector objective 3
Support and re-establish livelihoods and food security aftershocks.
Output 3.1: Food, cash and non-food items distributed in sufficient quantity and quality to targeted
beneficiaries under secure conditions
Output Indicator
2013 target
Numbers of women, men, girls and boys receiving food and non-food items,
by category and as % of planned
475,000
Total cash/vouchers value (US$) distributed, as % of planned
100%
% of beneficiaries receiving cash/vouchers on time
100%
Quantities of non-food items distributed, by type and as % of planned
100%
64
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output 3.2: Developed, built or restored livelihood assets by targeted communities and individuals
No indicators for monitoring.
Top-priority actions, beneficiaries, and locations
Preparedness for the upcoming general elections in Kenya is the top priority for early 2013. The
Food Assistance Sector members are working jointly to mobilize food and cash resources
sufficient to support any humanitarian action that will be required in case of large-scale conflict or
violence that may lead to displacement of people in areas considered as hotspots. Preparedness
actions will be guided by early warning information from various stakeholders.
Food assistance to people affected or recovering from drought in ASAL areas will continue, with a
strong emphasis on a gradual shift from relief to recovery/resilience building.
Monitoring and evaluation of food/cash distributions and of projects’ implementations will be
central to the success of the assistance. Evaluations will examine the impacts on household
income and livelihood strategies and will monitor the shift from GFD to FFA, the transition from
food assistance, disaster risk reduction and the benefits for adaptation to climate change resulting
from improved resilience. A Community and Household Surveillance survey will be carried out
three times a year to provide information on food security and the nutrition situation at critical
times of the year.
Table of proposed coverage per location and beneficiaries
Geographic
Location
FOOD ASSISTANCE
State
Eastern
Province
North
Eastern
Province
Coast
Rift Valley
Action Aid-Isiolo
Food For the Hungry-Marsabit
World Vision-Moyale, Makueni North
Kenya Red Cross-Makueni South
Catholic Diocese of Meru-Tharaka
Catholic Diocese of Nyeri-Laikipia
Catholic Diocese of Kitui-Kitui
Action Aid-Mwingi
Kenya Red Cross-Ijara, Garissa
Arid Lands Development Focus (ALDEF)-Wajir
Consortium of Cooperating Partners (COCOP)-Mandera
Kenya Red Cross-Tana River, Malindi, Kwale
World Vision Kenya-Kilifi, Taita Taveta
Oxfam GB-Turkana North and Central
World Vision-Turkana South, Baringo, East Pokot, west
Pokot
65
TOTAL:
7
TOTAL:
3
TOTAL:
2
TOTAL:
2
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Health
Sector lead agency
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION and Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation
and Medical Services
Funds required
$15,625,091 for 8 projects
Contact information
Dr. Custodia Mandlhate (WRkenya@ke.afro.who.int)
People in need and target beneficiaries
Number of people in need
Beneficiaries targeted in sector’s
EHRP projects (end-year target)
Category of
people in need
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
IDPs
300,000
150,000
450,000
300,000
150,000
450,000
Disease outbreaks
800,000
400,000
1,200,000
650,000
300,000
950,000
10,000
10,000
20,000
1,500
500
2,000
Children
700,000
700,000
1,400,000
500,000
500,000
1,000,000
Special vulnerable
groups (HIV,
gender etc.)
300,000
250,000
550,000
280,000
200000
480,000
Mass casualty
Totals
2,110,000
1,510,000
3,620,000
1,731,500
1,150,500
2,882,000
Explanation of number of beneficiaries targeted
The Health Sector partners will be asked to respond to various health emergencies such as
disease outbreaks, the drought effects on health and mass casualty disasters from urban fires in
Nairobi and other slums, election violence, terrorist attacks and other conflicts. The Sector has
often responded promptly, thereby mitigating the impact of these disasters. El Niño-related
flooding is forecast for the latter part of 2012, with direct effects and subsequent vectorborne
disease outbreaks in 2013. The health emergency situation for 2013 appears precarious with
persisting risks of disease outbreaks (measles, cholera, hepatitis E and vaccine-derived polio
outbreaks are ongoing), insecurity and mass casualties.
The health-care delivery system is still weak and overstretched; it will not be able to respond to
any disaster or large-scale disease outbreak without humanitarian support from partners. The
devolution of power to the county levels for the first time in 2013 will also require a lot of technical
and structural support from partners in order to start operations, which may take years to be
established.
Mass displacement is estimated at 400,000 – 450,000 people due to conflict/insecurity, and
20,000 people due to food insecurity. The majority of those expected to be displaced will be
women and children. Apart from the displaced population requiring health services, displacement
will likely exacerbate gender-based violence. An estimated 5 to 10% of women and young girls
among the displaced population could be affected. Conflict/insecurity could also lead to mass
casualties. An estimated 20,000 mass casualties may occur, i.e. 5% of the displaced population.
66
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
In addition, 10,000 mass casualties are estimated from other hazards (e.g. fires). About 1 million
children will need vaccination for measles, polio and vitamin A supplementation.
The health risks will likely be most prominent in the 28 already identified potential conflict
hotspots. Conflict and insecurity are also expected to disrupt health services, which will affect all
people living in these areas,
not only those displaced.
Furthermore, the expected
hazard/disaster conditions in 2013 will likely enhance the risk and transmission of diseases such
as HIV, TB, respiratory tract diseases, acute watery diarrhoea, cholera and all other diseases of
epidemic potential e.g. dengue fever, rift valley fever and malaria. It is estimated that 900,000
displaced and host populations will be affected by service disruption.. The current insecurity in
the northern parts of the country is contributing to reduced access to primary health-care services
for the most vulnerable people, as well as increased logistics costs to ensure the supply of
essential medicines and other medical supplies.
The ongoing measles (see map below), hepatitis E and cholera outbreaks in the refugee camps
and host communities are unlikely to be contained if the current water and sanitation conditions
prevail. At least 10% of the camp population will be at risk of infection, especially pregnant
women, with varying degrees of severity. Kenya is just recovering from the post-drought effects,
hence existing malnutrition levels are expected to improve progressively if there are no new foodsecurity shocks in 2013. Few districts, especially in the North-Eastern Province, will have
malnutrition rates below the emergency threshold, but nutrition surveillance will be needed.
There are 692 cases of multi-drug resistant tubercolusis registered in the country; more than 50%
of these cases are refugees from neighbouring countries who require immediate humanitarian aid
to avoid spreading the disease among the refugee and host population. There are indications
that the number may reduce if the situation in Somalia improves. However, refugees’ health
needs will persist as the camps are currently experiencing disease outbreaks and the water and
sanitation challenges have not been resolved. These are compounded by cross-border
challenges and easy transmission of diseases across the borders.
Almost 3 million people will require some form of humanitarian support, including 1 million
children and a similar number of women.
How the sector response plan will contribute to the strategic objectives
The Health Sector will encourage partnerships, collaboration and coordination for synergy and
effectiveness of its actions. Coordination forums will be established at the national and county
level and for the eight humanitarian hubs established. Leads will be identified based on
comparative strength and ability to support Government structures for coordination, rapid health–
and-nutrition assessments, gaps identification and local capacity-building. The implementation of
the Health Sector humanitarian response and local resilience-building activities will clearly identify
cross-cutting issues such as HIV, gender, rights-based programming, protection, psycho-social,
environment, equity, governance and community empowerment.
As the Health Sector lead, WHO will facilitate the key support required from partners including
coordinating humanitarian partners and activities, supporting rapid health-and-nutrition
assessments, facilitating multi-sector and partner planning, standards and guidelines, and
implementing activities and monitoring. Partner analysis and mapping are also critical. WHO will
also support stakeholders at national and county levels for real-time information management and
dissemination, identifying and filling gaps, and local capacity-building. UNFPA, also in
coordination with partners, will complement and scale up existing sexual reproductive health
67
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
services among the crisis-affected communities and refugee populations by strengthening the
implementation of minimum initial services package for REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH and
advocating the prioritization of comprehensive reproductive health services as a vital component
of primary health-care services.
Sector objectives and output targets
Strategic objective #1
The humanitarian needs of highly vulnerable populations affected by natural and manmade
disasters are met through life-saving assistance.
Sector objective 1
Ensure that critical life-saving surge capacities (services, resources and supplies) are available
and accessible to the vulnerable groups (mainly boys, girls and women), including mass casualty
victims at key strategic locations in the arid and semi-arid regions.
Output: Health Sector partners coordinated at national, county and district level
Output Indicator
2013 target
Coordination forums established as percentage of planned
80%
Partner analysis and mapping done of all participating partners
100%
Partner mapping disseminated, and used to identify gaps
80%
Joint health sector disaster response plans developed, as percentage of
planned
100%
Information management scheduled dissemination established at all levels
80%
Rapid health and nutrition assessments conducted, as percentage of planned
80%
Output: Preposition essential, drugs, laboratory reagents, basic equipment for epidemic diseases and
materials, consumables, and health and REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH kits, especially for children and
pregnant women at targeted locations
Output Indicator
2013 target
Laboratory reagents and basic laboratory investigation kits available in target
locations as percentage of planned
80%
District Health teams and Partners in strategic locations strengthened for rapid
deployment in vulnerable areas in percentage of target districts
80%
Essential life-saving drugs available and deployed timely to at least eight (8)
strategic locations (hubs) as percentage of planned
100%
68
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output: Identify key partners for provision of alternative life-saving health care services services to
special vulnerable groups and also for logistics
Output Indicator
2013 target
Partner mapping disseminated, and used to identify partners to address gaps
100%
Partners and system identified for delivery of HIV and TB tracing and provision
of house-based treatments established to cover target areas
100%
Partners for community based service provision and referral to the higher
levels for pregnant women and children and survivors of gender-based
violence established to cover target areas
80%
Coverage of emergency vaccination against measles and polio conducted for
at least 400,000 children at risk in arid and semi-arid regions
80%
Capacity of district, provincial partners and hospitals to manage severe and
complicated malnutrition enhanced in the vulnerable regions, as percentage of
planned districts
80%
Output: Functioning early warning and alert network in most vulnerable counties and districts.
Output Indicator
2013 target
Guidelines and tools for Early Warning and Response Networks available in
targeted counties
100%
Orientation for district health teams and partners conducted for Early Warning
and Response Networks
80%
Logistics support for district health teams and partners provided timely for
investigation and reporting
80%
Strategic objective #2
Communities have enhanced resilience, reducing the impact of disasters, and lessened chronic
vulnerability by means of DRR and early recovery approaches.
Sector objective 2
Create awareness and increase community’s public health capacity to demand and utilize
essential Health and Nutrition services.
Output: Support district health teams for integrated community health outreaches
Output Indicator
2013 target
Technical guidelines and health education materials made available in
targeted counties
100%
Training conducted for DHMTs, civil society organizations and community
health workersin priority districts
60%
Resources mobilized and logistics support provided
60%
69
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output Indicator
2013 target
Monitoring and evaluation conducted
80%
Output: Support vaccination of children less than five years in at least 10 counties
Output Indicator
2013 target
Vaccines and consumables procured for target group
100%
Training conducted for vaccination teams as percentage of planned
100%
Resources provided for campaigns conducted (coverage)
95%
Output: Identify and organize targeted public health education for special vulnerable groups at
community level (women groups, survivors of gender-based violence, elderly and children in schools)
Output Indicator
2013 target
Different target groups in at least 10 counties identified
100%
Health promotion materials made available to target groups
100%
Training conducted for DHMTs, CSOs, partners and CHWs in target districts
100%
Number of women groups participating in health promotion activities
80%
Strategic objective #3
Increased commitment on the part of the Government of Kenya and development actors to
address issues of chronic vulnerability and provide durable solutions.
Sector objective 3
Support county level health sector governance structures in their commitment to disaster risk
reduction and disaster management through leadership and governance at county level.
Output: Forums for disaster response and resilience-building in counties established
Output Indicator
2013 target
Advocacy with at least 10 county commissioners
100%
At least 40% representation of women on health committees
Quarterly health sector disaster committees and forum established as
percentage of planned
80%
Health sector disaster preparedness and response conducted in priority
counties
7 out of 10
Disaster risk reduction and management plans developed in priority counties
7 out of 10
70
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output Indicator
2013 target
Early warning and alert response networks established in priority counties
70%
Number of women groups engaged in health activities as percentage of
planned
40%
Top-priority actions, beneficiaries, and locations
Actions: Emergency response and resilience-building
Beneficiaries: 3,620,000
Locations:




Rift Valley Province (Turkana, West and East Pokot, Garbatulla, Samburu, Laikipia,
Kajiado, Baringo)
Eastern Province (Isiolo, Marsabit, Moyale, Tanariver, Mwingi, Kitui, Yatta)
North Eastern Province (Garissa, Mandera, Wajir)
Coast Province (Taita, Kinango, Kwale, Kilifi)
Table of proposed coverage per location
Geographic
Location
HEALTH
State
Nairobi
Eldoret
Nakuru
Garissa
Mombasa
WHO, NDOC, MoH, PHMT, CHT, DHMT, IOM, Kenya
Red Cross, Sector members
WHO, PHMT, CHT, DHMT,IOM, Kenya Red Cross,
UNFPA, UNICEF, MERLIN
WHO, PHMT, CHT, DHMT, Kenya Red Cross,
UNFPA, UNICEF
WHO, PHMT, CHT, DHMT, Kenya Red Cross, Islamic
Relief, IRC, GIZ, MSF, UNFPA, UNICEF, MERLIN
WHO, PHMT, CHT, DHMT, Kenya Red Cross,
UNFPA, UNICEF
TOTAL:
ALL
TOTAL:
9
TOTAL:
7
TOTAL:
12
TOTAL:
7
Isiolo
WHO, PHMT, CHT, DHMT, Kenya Red Cross, IOM,
UNICEF
TOTAL:
8
Marsabit
WHO, PHMT, CHT, DHMT, Kenya Red Cross, IOM,
UNICEF
TOTAL:
8
Turkana
WHO, PHMT, CHT, DHMT, Kenya Red Cross,
Catholic Diocese, MERLIN, IRC, UNFPA
TOTAL:
9
Kisumu
WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA
TOTAL:
3
71
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Multi-Sector for Refugees
Sector lead agency
UNHCR
Funds required
$433,301,840 for 11 projects
Contact information
Ivana Unluova (Unluova@unhcr.org)
People in need and target beneficiaries
Beneficiaries targeted in sector’s EHRP
projects (end-year target)
Number of people in need
Category of
people in need
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
Refugees
333,525
340,263
673,788
333,525
340,263
673,788
Host
Communities
199,151
203,174
402,325
24,750
25,250
50,000
Totals
723,788
Explanation of number of beneficiaries targeted
100% of the refugees and asylum seekers in Kenya are targeted. The planning figures for each
of the three main refugee locations are:



Dadaab – 463,788
Kakuma – 145,000
Urban (Nairobi) – 65,000
In total, 49.5% of the population are women, however, in Kakuma women account for 46.2%.
Only 45.5% of the total refugee populations are adults above 18 years, including 3.1% who are
seniors (above 60). On the other hand, children and youth constitute 54.5% of all refugees in
Kenya.
The host communities only include populations residing in the immediate vicinity of the camps
that will be targeted by planned interventions.
How the sector response plan will contribute to the strategic objectives
The multi-sector response plan will contribute towards the strategic objective 1: The humanitarian
needs of highly vulnerable populations affected by natural and man-made disasters are met
through life-saving assistance and protection as per national and international standards.
The core objectives are to provide protection to refugees and asylum seekers; ensure delivery of
basic services; and support durable solutions. Specifically, under protection, priority will first be to
secure access to asylum and international protection for asylum-seekers; preserve the asylum
space across the Kenyan territory and maintain the civilian character of camps; and secondly, to
facilitate refugee access to basic services; and find durable solutions, including voluntary
repatriation, where feasible, in safety and dignity. To help achieve these ends, UNHCR as the
sector lead, will foster strategic partnerships with key national and international partners, as well
as refugees themselves through their increased participation in the services delivery in the camps
and self-management structures. Livelihoods and self-reliance of refugees will be prioritized
mainly for the urban caseload. Refugees in the camps will also be supported in skills
development, training and viable business venture establishment.
72
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Priority will be given to ensuring that all people of concern in camps or urban centres are
protected in accordance with national law and the relevant international conventions. The
protection of vulnerable groups such as single women headed-households; children, including
those unaccompanied or separated from their families; the elderly; and people with special needs
will feature prominently in protection activities.
Efforts will continue to support the Kenyan Government’s refugee management structures by
working closely with the Department of Refugee Affairs (DRA), the relevant ministries in Nairobi,
and the authorities in the refugee-hosting counties of Garissa and Turkana. The review of the
security partnership between the Government and UNHCR is likely to lead to further improvement
in the security situation in Dadaab and the preservation of law and order in the Dadaab and
Kakuma camps, and to address the national security concerns about the large refugee presence
especially in north-eastern Kenya.
The multi-sector members, especially those working on both sides of the Somalia border will
facilitate voluntary repatriation to Somalia that is informed and, where feasible, undertaken in
safety and with dignity. UNHCR and its partners will organize the collection and dissemination of
objective and balanced information on areas of return. Other durable solutions opportunities,
notably resettlement, will continue to be pursued for refugees whose particular situation warrants
relocation from the country.
Multi-sector objectives and output targets
Strategic objective #1
The humanitarian needs of highly vulnerable populations affected by natural and man-made
disasters are met through life-saving assistance and protection as per national and
international standards
Multi-sector objective 1
To ensure physical and legal rights of people of concern (men, women, girls and boys) are
safeguarded through protection measures including registration, refugee status determination,
legal assistance, sexual and gender-based violence response and child protection
Output: Protection from crime strengthened
Output Indicator
2013 target
Extent security management system effective in ensuring security of people of
concern
60%
# of police in camps/communities
970
Output: Protection of children strengthened
Output Indicator
2013 target
73
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
# of UASC for whom a best interest determination has been initiated or
completed
6,310
# of out-of-school adolescents participating in targeted programmes
1280
# of unaccompanied children placed in alternative care arrangements
240
Output: Risk of GBV reduced and quality of response improved
Output Indicator
2013 target
# of reported incidents of SGBV per year
200
% of known SGBV survivors who received support
100%
Multi-sector objective 2
To provide lifesaving multi-sector humanitarian aid to refugees and asylum seekers in Kenya with
particular attention to women, children and people with specific needs
Output: Health status of the population improved
Output Indicator
2013 target
Under five mortality rate (per 1000 /month)
0.2 per 1000 population
per month
Crude mortality rate
0.2 per 1,000
population/month
Measles vaccination coverage
95%
# of people referred to secondary and tertiary medical care by gender
84,000
# of people receiving primary health care services
664,000
# of health facilities equipped/constructed/rehabilitated
6
Output: Population has optimal access to reproductive health and HIV services
Output Indicator
2013 target
MMR
0
% of live births attended by skilled personnel
90%
% of rape survivors receiving PEP within 72 hours of an incident
100% of those that reported
within 72 hours incident
Output: Nutrition well-being improved
Output Indicator
2013 target
Prevalence of GAM (6-59 months)
4%
% of people receiving complementary food commodities
16% (all under-fives)
Output: Shelter and infrastructure established/improved/maintained
Output Indicator
2013 target
74
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
% of households living in adequate dwelling
60%
# of transitional shelters provided
12,500 transitional shelters
constructed
#of emergency shelters provided
6,000 emergency shelters
# of buildings/structures constructed
25 public buildings
/structures constructed
# of camps established
One camp established for
20,000 people
Output: Supply of potable water increased or maintained
Output Indicator
2013 target
Average number of litres of potable water available per person
20 litres per person/day
# of people per tap stand
80 person/tap
# of boreholes drilled
4 boreholes drilled
# of meters of water pipes established
51,000 meters of water pipes
established
Output: Population lives in satisfactory sanitation and hygiene conditions
Output Indicator
2013 target
% of PoC receiving 250gr soap/per/month
100%
# of household sanitary facilities/latrines constructed
17,000
# of women with sanitary supplies
120,000
Output: Population has optimal access to education
Output Indicator
2013 target
% of PoC aged 6-13 years enrolled in primary education
68% Dadaab, 50% Kakuma
# of educational facilities constructed and accessible for classes
16 schools constructed in Dadaab
and 42 classrooms in Kakuma
# of people participating in vocational education
5,000
# of PoC enrolled in secondary education by gender
6,082 in Dadaab
Output: Services for people with specific needs strengthened
Output Indicator
2013 target
# of people with disabilities receiving specific support
14,800
Output: Population has optimal access to energy
Output Indicator
2013 target
% of households with access to sustainable energy
48 -50%
Output: Self-reliance and livelihoods improved
Output Indicator
2013 target
75
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
# of women and men supported with small business establishment grant
7%
% of adult women and men of working age with own business/selfemployed.
25 %
Multi-sector objective 3
Promote durable solutions for refugees through facilitation of resettlement and voluntary
repatriation processes
Output: Potential for voluntary return realised
Output Indicator
2013 target
% of PoC with intention to return who have returned voluntarily
100%
# of PoC provided with dignity returnee kits
2,000
Output: Potential for resettlement realised
Output Indicator
2013 target
# of resettlement cases identified
3,700
Number of cases identified submitted for resettlement
3,700
Top-priority actions, beneficiaries and locations
Actions: Improving refugees’ physical security, living standards, livelihoods and resilience with
focus on expanding investments in law and order, improving social services and infrastructure,
providing adequate shelter, providing low-cost services and renewable energy sources,
enhancing school enrolment, retention and graduation rates, training refugees in marketable
skills, and helping small-scale entrepreneurs with start-up grants.
Beneficiaries: Mainly Somali refugees and asylum seekers in Dadaab camps: 463,788 refugees;
refugees and asylum seekers of various nationalities in Kakuma camp: 145,000; Refugees and
asylum seekers in urban areas: 60,000.
Locations: Dadaab refugee complex (Dadaab and Alinjugur camps), Kakuma camp, Nairobi and
other urban centres with refugee populations.
76
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Table of proposed coverage per location
Geographic
Location
MULTI-SECTOR FOR REFUGEES
State
DADAAB
CAMPS
DRA, ADEO, AVSI, CARE International, CESVI, DRC,
FaIDA, FilmAID, Handicap International, GOAL, IRC,
IOM, LWF, Kenya Red Cross Society, MSF Suisse,
NCCK, NRC, Save the Children, Islamic Relief
Worldwide, Oxfam UK, Relief, Reconstruction and
Development Organisation, WFP, WHO, UNICEF,
Windle Trust UK, IMC, ACF.
TOTAL:
27
KAKUMA
CAMP
DRA, AVSI, CESVI, Don Bosco, DRC, FAIDA, FILMAID,
IRC, JRS, LWF, NCCK, NRC, WFP, UNICEF, Kenya
Magistrates and Judges Association
TOTAL:
15
URBAN
AREAS
(Nairobi,
other urban
centres)
Centre for Domestic Training and Development CDTD),
DRA, IRC, DRC, HIAS, JRS, RCK, Kenya Magistrates
and Judges Association , Legal Advise Centre( Kituo
Cha Sheria)
TOTAL :
9
77
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Nutrition
Sector lead agency
UNICEF and Division of Nutrition - MoPHS
Funds required
$50,710,861 for 18 projects
Contact information
Brenda AKWANYI (bakwanyi@unicef.org)
People in need and target beneficiaries6
Beneficiaries targeted in sector ’s
EHRP projects (end-year target)
Number of people in need
Category of
people in need
Children (boys and
girls) <5 yrs.
affected by acute
malnutrition
Women affected
by acute
malnutrition
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
135,000
165,000
309,500
18,250
212,250
309,500
29,281
29,281
-
29,281
1,644,580
657,832
657,832
1,315,664
483,449
386,759
29,281
Children (boys and
girls) <5 yrs., for
other7 nutrition
services
822,290
Women, for other
nutrition services8
483,449
822,290
Children (boys
and girls) <5 yrs.
and women(
contingency for
pre-post-election),
nutrition services
36,000
386,759
36,000
Explanation of number of beneficiaries targeted
Nutrition surveys carried out in the ASAL areas in 2012 indicate that there has been a significant
reduction in GAM and SAM levels in selected areas (Turkana, Mandera, Moyale and Kajiado) due
to increased access of quality high impact nutrition interventions and the food security
improvements from food and non-food interventions.9 The expected caseload of children (boys
and girls) under five suffering from acute malnutrition in ASAL has declined from 385,000 January
2012 to 300,000 as of October 2012. However, the situation in Wajir County and Mandera East
had not improved due to continuing food insecurity. Mandera and Wajir counties account for
75,644 (25%) of expected caseloads.10 In urban informal settlements about 9,500 children (boys
and girls) will require treatment for acute malnutrition in 2013. The difference in child malnutrition
between the wealthiest and poorest households is twice as great in urban areas (vs. rural),
6
It is planned to collect information and report on other groups(living with HIV/AIDS, female headed households, elderly
women, women and children with disabilities) through sex and age disaggregating.
7 Children (boys and girls) receiving micronutrients and maternal, infant and young child feeding nutrition services.
8 Women( pregnant and lactating ,adolescents) and receiving micronutrients and maternal, infant and young child
feeding nutrition services.
9 Kenya Nutrition Survey Summary updates, October 2012.
10 DHIS nutrition data 2012
78
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
highlighting the inequities of urbanization and affecting 1.7 million children living in poverty in
urban areas.
Kenya has experienced violence during campaign periods, as well as during and after elections.
As part of the humanitarian pillar contingency planning for the 4 March general election, 150,000
people are estimated to be displaced between September 2012 and April 2013.11. The Nutrition
Sector plans to respond to 36,000 under-five children (boys and girls) and PLWs displaced in
case of pre- and post-election violence.
How the sector response plan will contribute to the strategic objectives
The Nutrition Sector response plan is in line with the 2012-2017 Kenya Nutrition Action Plan that
serves as a road map for coordinated implementation of nutrition interventions by the
Government and nutrition stakeholders. It has 11 strategic objectives whose goal is to promote
and improve nutrition status of all Kenyans.
The Nutrition Sector response plan will contribute to strategic objective 1 through preventive and
curative actions for under-five children (boys and girls) and women affected, including droughtaffected, urban poor and displaced populations. This will be done through the provision and
access of High Impact Nutrition Interventions in all ASALs and in vulnerable urban contexts.
Building capacity of communities to demand and utilize nutrition services by scaling up behaviour
change, communication strategies and enhancing the participation of men, women, boys and girls
in nutrition surveillance will contribute to strategic objective 2 on enhanced communities
resilience.
Recognizing the changes anticipated with the new devolved government structures and the
phasing to long-term government development, the sector intends to increase county level
commitment and leadership of effective nutrition response through strengthened county
coordination and use of sex and age disaggregated data in the new information systems and
survey guidelines to elaborate other vulnerable groups for evidence based nutrition response and
programming.
Sector objectives and output targets
Strategic objective #1
The humanitarian needs of highly vulnerable populations affected by natural and man-made
disasters are met through life-saving assistance and protection as per national and international
standards.
Sector objective 1.1
To contribute to the reduction of morbidity and mortality in under-five children (boys and girls) and
women through preventive and curative actions to affected populations, including droughtaffected, urban poor and displaced populations.
Output: Under-five children (boys and girls) and women affected by acute malnutrition have increased
access to treatment at health facility and community level 12
11
12
Inter-sector working group draft on inter agency pre and post- election contingency planning 2012/2013
Targeted beneficiaries (75% severely malnutrition and 50% moderate malnutrition: Sphere Standards)
79
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output Indicator
2013 target
Severely malnourished children (boys and girls) accessing treatment
75%
Moderate malnourished children (boys and girls) accessing treatment
50%
Malnourished PLW accessing treatment
50%
Output: Increased performance of management of acute malnutrition for children (boys and girls) and
women
Output Indicator
2013 target
Severely malnourished children (boys and girls) accessing treatment who
recover
80%
Moderate malnourished children (boys and girls) accessing treatment who
recover
80%
Malnourished PLW accessing treatment who recover
80%
Output : Improved infant and young-child feeding practices
Output Indicator
2013 target
Infants initiating breastfeeding within one hour of birth
70%
Children (boys and girls) < 6 months old exclusively breastfed
60%
Children (boys and girls) aged 6-23 months who receive foods from 4 or more
food groups
80%
Children (boys and girls) 6 to 23 months of children receiving food in a day
(food frequency) (dietary diversity)
Output: Increased coverage of vitamin A supplementation for children under five
Output Indicator
2013 target
Children 6-59 months (boys and girls) receive vitamin A supplement (twice
yearly
65%
Output: Increased coverage of iron/folic supplementation for pregnant women
Output Indicator
2013 target
PLW supplemented with iron folate
80%
Output: Increased coverage of deworming
Output Indicator
2013 target
Children 1-5 years (boys and girls) presenting at health facility dewormed
80%
Output: Increased coverage of zinc supplementation in children (boys and girls) presenting with
diarrhoea
Output Indicator
2013 target
Children 6 months -5 years (boys and girls) supplemented with zinc during
episodes of diarrhoea
75%
Strategic objective #2
Communities have enhanced resilience, reducing the impact of disasters, and lessened chronic
80
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
vulnerability by means of DRR and early recovery approaches.
Sector objective 2.1
To improve community resilience by building capacity of men, women, boys and girls to demand
and utilize nutrition services and linkages with other existing sectors.
Output: Increased multi-sectoral linkage for nutrition outcomes
Output Indicator
2013 target
Nutrition projects in EHRP 2013 with links to WASH, Health, Agriculture and
Livestock, Food Security at objective and operational level
80%
Health facilities delivering HINI as per standards
80%
Key nutrition and gender sensitive advocacy messages developed and shared
with community support groups and other sectors
100%
Strategic objective #3
Increased commitment on the part of the GoK and development actors to address issues of
chronic vulnerability and provide durable solutions.
Sector objective 3.1
To increase county level commitment and leadership of effective nutrition response through
strengthened coordination and information systems.
Output: Strengthened sectorial linkages and coordination mechanisms at county level and improved
quality and timeliness of reporting and use of data
Output Indicator
2013 target
Counties with complete monthly nutrition reports (sex and age disaggregated)
used at county coordination foras
80%
Counties having monthly nutrition coordination meeting
80%
Sector objective 3.2
Increase the recognition and investment of nutrition related interventions by the Government of
Kenya and development partners through communication and advocacy.
Output: Nutrition objectives, activities and budgets reflected in county planning and budget processes.
Output Indicator
2013 target
County plans reflect the Kenya Nutrition Action Plan objectives and activities
80%
Funding to Nutrition within the health sector budget increased
3%
81
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Top-priority actions, beneficiaries, and locations
Actions:
 Continued scale-up and delivery of the 11 high-impact nutrition interventions packages
focusing on mother and infant feeding, micronutrient supplementation and management
of acute malnutrition.
 Efficient coordination mechanism both at national and county levels.
 Efficient nutrition information system for situational analysis/ early warning and routine
reporting with sex and age disaggregated data collected and analysed to enhance
equitable evidence based programming.
 Capacity building of community support groups, counties and partners on planning and
budgeting for nutrition services.
 Timely and adequate procurement and distribution of essential nutrition supplies.
Beneficiaries:
 309,500 - Children (boys and girls) <5 yrs. affected by acute malnutrition (ASAL and
urban)
 29,281 - PLW affected by acute malnutrition.
 1,315,664- Children (boys and girls) receiving micronutrients and maternal, infant and
young child feeding nutrition services.
 386,759 - Pregnant women receiving micronutrients and maternal, infant and young child
feeding nutrition services.
 30,000 children (boys and girls) and 6000 PLW- contingency for displacement due to
pre- and post-election conflict.
Locations:
 -Rift Valley Province (Turkana, West and East Pokot, Garbatulla, Samburu, Laikipia,
Kajiado, Baringo)
 -Eastern Province (Isiolo, Marsabit, Moyale, Tanariver, Mwingi, Kitui, Yatta)
 -North Eastern Province (Garissa, Mandera, Wajir)
 Coast Province (Taita, Kinango, kwale, kilifi)
82
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Table of proposed coverage per location
Geographic
Location
Wajir
Mandera
Turkana
Garissa
Samburu
Marsabit /Moyale
West Pokot
Mwingi
Tanariver
Isiolo/ Garbatulla
Kajiado
Kitui
East Pokot/ Baringo
Laikipia
Meru North
Kinango/Kwale/Kilifi
Kisumu
Nairobi
Kenya(county-wide)
NUTRITION
Save the Children, Islamic Relief
Save the Children, Islamic Relief, Pastoralist
against Hunger
World Vision, Merlin, IRC
Mercy USA, Tdh, IRC
World Vision IMC
FHI, Concern WW, World Vision
ACF
Mercy USA
IMC
ACF
Concern WW, Mercy USA
World Vision, Samaritan Purse
World Vision
IMC
IMC
Mercy USA, WVI
Concern WW
Concern WW
MOH, UNICEF, WFP, WHO
83
TOTAL:
2
TOTAL:
3
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
3
4
2
4
1
11
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
4
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Protection
Sector lead agency
UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES
Funds required
$10,233,095 for 10 projects
Contact information
JACQUELINE PARLEVLIET (parlevli@unhcr.orgl);
SALATON LETEIPAN (leteipan@unhcr.org)
People in need and target beneficiaries
Beneficiaries targeted in sector’s EHRP
projects (end-year target)
Number of people in need
Category of
people in
need
Children
Female
Male
Total
Children
Female
Male
Total
IDPs
133,876
155,908
79,232
369,016
133,876
155,908
79,232
369,016
Totals
133,676
155,908
79,232
369,016
133,676
155,908
79,232
369,016
Increased occurrences of child protection concerns and conflict-related sexual violence are
common in the context of natural disasters and conflict based conflicts (including pastoralist
communities clashing over meagre water and other resources).13
Lastly, the intense campaigns leading up to the March 2013 elections may disrupt seasonal
farming activities such as land preparation. They could also disrupt the distribution of main
staples from the surplus-producing to the deficit/consumption markets, hence affecting food
security.
Sustainable resettlement, return and durable solutions
The implementation of the government’s land resettlement programme for 2007/08 PEV IDPs
intensified during the first half of 2012 with the government instituting an inter-ministerial taskforce
dedicated to identification and purchase of resettlement land. An alternative land purchase
procedure was also launched by the government to fast-track the resettlement programme.14 As
a result of the accelerated resettlement programme a total of 4,905 PEV IDP households have
been resettled from the initial 6,978.15 Consequently, a substantial number of the 21 officially-
The report, “Out of wedlock, into school: combating child marriage through education,” by the UN’s Special Envoy for
Global Education, Mr. Gordon Brown cites Kenya as a country where child marriages sometimes increase during periods
of crisis, a phenomenon referred to as “drought brides”.
14 Publicized and appeared in the Daily Nation and the Standard of Thursday 17th February 2012.It is spearheaded by
the local provincial administration in the targeted areas.
15 A large-scale resettlement exercise was undertaken at Wiyumiririe farm in Laikipia East where a total of 1,600 IDPs
households (translating to an estimated 5,000 individuals) were resettled by the government between March and April
2012. Widespread threats for displaced people include the risk of prolonged displacement and lack of alternatives for
return, reintegration and/or resettlement for vulnerable people due to loss of assets and resolution of the cause of their
displacement. A prominent fear of displaced people is to not be able to return to their places of origin or get assistance
to rebuild their lives. There is an urgent need to identify areas where return is possible in the short or medium term, as
well as resettlement options with sustainable solutions for groups of displaced who cannot return to their former homes
or livelihoods.
13
84
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
established IDP camps have been closed with only a few transit camps remaining.16
Humanitarian aid by the government for IDP returnees has been generally constrained with little
support for the long-term needs of the formerly displaced people.17 Land based solutions and
restitution need to be explored.
Considerable challenges remain in the promotion of healing and reconciliation in areas that
registered significant violence during the 2007/08 post-election violence. The NCIC in
collaboration with other stakeholders continue to implement peace-building activities and
programmes. Peace and Reconciliation Committees have been established in post-election
areas. The government has deployed Special District Officers trained in peace and conflict
resolution to post-election violence areas. Healing and reconciliation have witnessed increased
involvement of local and national politicians. However, formerly displaced people and IDPs
continue receiving threats of further eviction every time there are political conflicts at the national
level.
An apparent threat to IDPs includes the risk of prolonged displacement and lack of alternatives
for return, reintegration and/or resettlement for vulnerable people due to loss of assets and
resolution of the cause of their displacement. A prominent fear of displaced people is to not be
able to return to their places of origin or get assistance to rebuild their lives.18 There is an urgent
need to identify areas where return is possible in the short- or medium-term, as well as
resettlement options with sustainable solutions for groups of displaced people who cannot return
to their former homes or livelihoods.
There is also an urgent need for provision of objective, reliable and accessible information
targeting the affected populations, including illiterate people, at all levels for the population to
better understand the on-going relief, assistance and durable solutions programmes. Further,
addressing inter-communal tension and violence, as well as land and property related disputes
are critical in facilitating durable solutions. Reintegration and/or resettlement are a key need
across all affected provinces. There is continued need for access to legal redress mechanisms
and legal assistance encompassing restitution measures to aid document recovery and durable
solutions. Psycho-social counselling for PEV IDPs has also been identified as a gap, especially
amongst girls and boys where the need is deemed acute.19
In the lead up to the general elections, the public and media attention on IDPs has increased with
political leaders using the IDP problem as a political resource. The political elite are using the
IDPs to bargain their various political positions, including forming political alliances. At the same
time, there are concerns that the concept of IDP is used increasingly in reference to members of
one ethnic community, yet other communities suffered displacement and deaths during the crisis
as well. This has and continues to undermine efforts to promote healing and reconciliation, and
national cohesion in general.
16
In spite of these efforts, over 2,000 Kenyan refugees are still in Uganda awaiting the negotiation of a tripartite
agreement between UNHCR and the governments of Kenya and Uganda. A sticking point in the on-going negotiations
is the proposal by UNHCR for the introduction of a restitution clause.
17 This has been documented in KNCHR’s comprehensive and systematic monitoring of the situation of PEV IDPs and
contained in KNCHR’s 2011 report titled ‘Homeless at Home.”
18This has been documented in KNCHR’s comprehensive and systematic monitoring of the situation of PEV IDPs IDPs
and contained in KNCHR’s 2011 report titled ‘Homeless at Home.”
19 According to the Ministry of Special Programs, most counselling has so far only targeted adult women and men and
excluded young boys and girls. A key component in an EHRP project proposal submitted by DRC is to provide psychosocial counselling to PEV IDPs in the Rift Valley.
85
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Sustained monitoring and strategic engagement of relevant stakeholders by the members of the
Protection Sector is important to ensure that the government fully and effectively implements
Agenda Item 2 on reforms.20
Child protection
The child protection system in Kenya is still in the nascent stages of development. National
priority areas for intervention during times of emergency continue to be identified thematically,
such as reunification of separated children, prevention and response to sexual violence, and
provision of psycho-social support in the form of child-friendly spaces.
Children affected by post-election violence continue to suffer psycho-social distress. They
struggle to find alternatives to harmful coping mechanisms adopted during displacement, such as
sex work. While many children affected may have returned home to their families under the
umbrella of the Department of Children Services’ Reunification of Separated Children Program
over the course of 2008 – 2009, there has been a proliferation of street children in urban areas of
the Rift Valley. During a profiling of over 2,400 street children conducted in 5 locations in 2011,
37% of children reported that they were displaced as a result of PEV. The study highlights the
long-term impact of emergencies, with a significant number of those displaced by PEV only
joining the streets in 2011 (22%). Almost half of the children interviewed had been affected in
some way by an emergency (PEV, tribal clashes, drought or flooding). Food insecurity was by far
the most significant push factor, with 59% of children reporting hunger as one of the reasons for
coming to the streets. This assessment is supported by NGOs working in areas such as Eldoret
and Nakuru, who report that the number of school drop-outs and children who are sent to beg or
work on the street, due to lack of livelihood options among IDP families, has increased
significantly.21
With the gradual onset of drought in Wajir, Marsabit, Isiolo, northern Garissa, northern Tana
River, and Mandera areas, the already vulnerable situation of many pastoralist and impoverished
children has been exacerbated. There is evidence that children are being separated from their
families and either left behind while parents seek work, food or security. In the alternative, some
children have been placed in boarding schools or charitable children’s institutions. In some
instances, children (primarily adolescent boys) separate from their families and migrate to urban
areas, thus becoming part of a burgeoning street children population.22 Children living on the
streets and separated children are more at risk of dropping out of school and being exposed to
exploitative work situations, sexual violence and abuse. Other child protection concerns caused
by the drought, highlighted in agency reports and targeted assessments, include children
engaged in labour, children dropping out of school, instances of early marriage (sometimes
20
Addressing humanitarian crises as provided by the Kenya National Dialogue and Reconciliation Framework in the
context of the National Accord and Reconciliation Act, 2008.
21 A baseline study on children connected to the streets was carried out by Save the Children in 2011, organized under
the auspices of the National Protection Working Group on Internal Displacement (PWGID) in collaboration with fieldbased groups and local government in five urban locations in the Rift Valley. The study profiled over 2,400 children
connected to the streets, and highlighted strong links between emergencies in the region and children joining the streets.
The study emphasizes the need for long-term planning in the provision of humanitarian responses, as well as the need
for a multi-sectoral strategy which addresses the root causes rather than the symptoms of the issues which lead children
to connect with the streets
22 For instance the DCO in Eldoret reports an increase in 800-1000 street children, with at least a third coming from
Turkana and Kitale citing poverty and lack of food as the reason for being on streets. Lodwar has seen an increase of
children living on the streets with projection that estimated number of 300 will increase in the coming period. In Kitale
there is according to local NGO working with street children around 1,400 children and every week, the number
increases with four children.
86
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
condoned by the parents), children, especially girls, engaging in commercial sex and a rise in
instances of GBV.23,
Gender-based violence (GBV)
While the prevalence of gender-based violence is believed to remain high, it is difficult to provide
accurate statistics due to the lack of a GBV Information Management System (GBVIMS) to collect
and analyse data for evidence and for programming. Accordingly, there is a need to introduce
GBVIMS in health facilities within communities. All four key sectors (medical, psycho-social,
security and legal) need to work more closely to respond comprehensively to GBV cases and to
conduct awareness raising activities on GBV within the communities, with a view to enhancing
prevention and response. It is also critical that the Protection Sector adopt a multi-sectoral
approach to prevention of GBV, for example by working with other sectors to ensure that the
location of water, sanitation and shelter facilities does not increase vulnerability to GBV.
The risk of human trafficking and/or smuggling for exploitative labour, prostitution, etc., increases
in displacement situations due to the effect of obstructed livelihood options.24
Attention also needs to be focused on the increased risk of HIV during humanitarian crises,
particularly when there are high levels of GBV. Related concerns include the direct link between
food insecurity and the ability to take ARVs, and the fact that although PEP commodities are
available, there is a limited ability to deliver these services. The response to individual HIV cases
also needs to be linked in with a continuum of HIV-related services, including a combination of
prevention services: i.e., bio-medical, behavioural and structural.
Legal framework and coordination
During the course of 2012, there have been significant developments in the legal and policy
framework in the protection and assistance of IDPs in Kenya. On 4 October, the 2012 IDP Bill,
successfully underwent its 3rd Reading in Parliament and is awaiting presidential assent prior to
its enactment.25
On policy formulation, the draft National Policy on the Prevention of Internal Displacement and
the Protection and Assistance to Internally Displaced Persons in Kenya (draft IDP Policy) is under
revision by MoSSP following consultation with the Ministry of Lands. Subsequently, the draft
policy shall be re-worked into a Sessional Paper for adoption by the Cabinet.
23
In urban centres of Turkana district notable increase of children engaged in begging, hawking, getting employed by
adults, including in the fishing industry, are being reported.
24
Rapid assessments and protection monitoring conducted in 2011 among pastoralist dropouts and IDPs in Kakuma
and Garissa and post-election violence area demonstrate a high prevalence of female-headed families/households
through family separation or death; increased rural-urban migration in search of employment opportunities, mainly by the
bread winners; and a high rate of female school dropouts. A counter trafficking campaign evaluation report (June 2010)
indicates that a lack of information of the risks of human trafficking and weakened community coping mechanisms are
major contributing factors that need to be addressed. Furthermore, the affected communities have undergone events
that may have provoked distress and weakened their emotional well-being. With the current drought crisis that is
predicted to escalate in 2012, more pastoralist communities especially women, girls and boys continue to migrate from
rural areas to urban centres with no relevant skills to get a means of employment they remain vulnerable.
The coastal region of Kenya and Nairobi are key destinations for internal trafficking. Victims are trafficked for domestic
servitude, forced prostitution, street begging and labour exploitation. Many of the cases identified in the coastal region
and Nairobi are from areas that are prone to natural disasters and man-made crisis. Women and girls are lured from
these areas with promises of better opportunities made to them or to their parents. Under-aged marriage, common
among some communities in Kenya, also enhances vulnerability to trafficking of girls. The need to promote community
coping mechanisms and reduce vulnerabilities to trafficking is fundamental.
25 Developed by the Parliamentary Select Committee on Resettlement of IDPs in consultation with the National PWGID
(advocacy sub-group).
87
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Intensified advocacy for the signature and ratification of the Kampala Convention is critical.26 The
PWG advocacy sub-group also needs to re-focus its advocacy work on other related legislations
such as the Evictions and Resettlement Procedures Bill and the National Drought Management
Authority Bill, 2012.
Coordination remains a priority and warrants enhancement. At the national level, continued
support will need to be rendered to the Protection Working Group on Internal Displacement
(PWGID), with a view to having effective full ownership of the forum by the Government of Kenya
(i.e. the Kenyan National Commission on Human Rights and the Ministry of Justice, National
Cohesion and Constitutional Affairs). Support will continue to be provided to the two field-based
PWGIDs (in Nakuru and Eldoret) and the newly launched Kitale PWG and to further
mainstreaming of the child protection and GBV in their work. The PWGIDs have proven to be
useful coordination and information sharing fora for government actors, community-based
organizations, INGOs and members of the UN family. As part of the preparedness and
contingency planning process ahead of the 2013 elections, the Protection Sector will constitute
the Humanitarian Pillar under the leadership of UNOCHA and NDOC/KRCS and shall explore the
existing mechanism of the PWG in c multi-sector coordination and assessments activities. There
is a consensus on the need for the continued capacity building in the areas of monitoring,
programming and protection/assistance delivery through adoption of the rights-based approach.
The project proposals are all in line with the overall protection sector objectives and seek to
address the described protection needs and concerns (e.g. child protection, GBV, durable
solutions, trafficking, coordination and protection monitoring).
Sector objectives and output targets
Strategic objective #1
The humanitarian needs of highly vulnerable populations affected by natural and man-made
disasters are met through lifesaving assistance and protection as per national and international
standards.
Sector objective 1
To enhance the capacity of the Protection Working Group on Internal Displacement to secure
access to protection, relief and early recovery assistance for people with specific needs, through
prevention, coordination advocacy, monitoring, referral, response and capacity-building at the
national and county levels.
26
Examples of the advocacy work undertaken by the Advocacy subgroup of the NPWGID include workshops for
members of the Parliamentary Select Committee on Internal Displacement and a stake holder’s workshop with the
Parliamentary Departmental Committee on Labour and Social Welfare which were held during 2012 The Committee is
supposed to review the laws and policies governing IDPs and assess how the government has addressed the plight of
IDPs displaced by post-election violence.
88
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output: Appropriate coordination tools/practices are developed and implemented at national and county
levels
Output Indicator
Implemented 3W tools
Number of assessments coordinated with the Government of Kenya
Number of effective national and county-based coordination mechanisms (sub
groups)
Number of county/community monitors deployed
Number of coordination working groups mainstreaming protection in their technical areas
Output: Appropriate monitoring/referral mechanisms are established and/or strengthened.
Output Indicator
Number of vulnerable populations assisted through referral mechanisms in place.
Sex, age and vulnerability are disaggregated in data collection and analysis.
Output: Appropriate capacity building is carried out.
Output Indicator
Number of trainings/workshops conducted.
Number of institutions/people benefiting.
Number of engagements with vulnerable/host communities.
Number of community owned structures established or strengthened.
Sector objective 2
To promote priority access for children to life-saving multi-sectoral emergency services and
protection from violation, abuse, exploitation and family separation, including through
interventions that contribute to the further development of the Kenya child protection systems at
family, community and national level.
Output: Child protection structures are strengthened at all levels
Output Indicator
Number of multi-sectoral actors trained and supported
Output: Data and statistics on child rights, violations are collected to inform child protection service
providers.
Output Indicator
Amount of disaggregated information on abuse collected.
89
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output: Enhanced coordination and referral mechanisms at different levels
Output Indicator
Number of children supported, referred and receiving services.
Number of reported child protection cases addressed or resolved.
Output: Preventive and participatory child protection measures initiated and enhanced
Output Indicator
Number of boys and girls participating in child protection activities.
Sector objective 3
To prevent and promote responses for survivors of GBV and those at risk of violence including
through strengthened coordination and enhanced capacities of national and county based state
and non-state actors.
Output: Increased access to direct assistance, including GBV support services for women and girls, men
and boys and victims of human trafficking
Output Indicator
Number of GBV survivors received direct assistance.
Number of GBV service providers trained.
Number of victims of human trafficking that received direct assistance.
Output: Advocacy for inclusion of HIV prevention, treatment and care services in GBV interventions
Output Indicator
Number of GBV survivors accessing HIV prevention, treatment and care services
Output: Increased capacity among state and non-state actors, to coordinate GBV and HIV activities at
national and county levels.
Output Indicator
Introduction of GBV information management systems in health facilities.
Output: Increased awareness on GBV and human trafficking-related laws and rights, including the Sexual
Offences Act and the Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation Act.
Output Indicator
Regular coordination meetings.
Number of trainings conducted with different stakeholders on human-trafficking related laws and rights
including the Sexual Offences Act and the Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation Act.
Number of IEC materials produced with targeted thematic messages on human-trafficking laws and rights.
Functional referral mechanisms.
Operational SOPs on GBV.
90
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Strategic objective #3
Increased commitment on the part of the Government of Kenya and development actors to
address issues of chronic vulnerability and provide durable solutions.
Sector objective 4
To promote the rights of IDPs and other vulnerable groups through various measures, including
the adoption and subsequent implementation of policies and legal frameworks to entrench
international and regional obligations and to coordinate grassroots responses to protection needs,
including measures to build resilience and promote durable solutions.
Output: Effective advocacy with key government and non-government actors, including IDPs, in respect
of adoption, dissemination and implementation of the National IDP Policy and the IDP Act (2012).27
Output Indicator
Number of concrete recommendations detailing specific action by key stakeholders, including IDPs.
Advocacy strategy developed for development of the IDP Act Regulations.
Output: Advocacy for the ratification and implementation of the Kampala Convention.
Output Indicator
Advocacy strategy developed for ratification and implementation of the Kampala Convention.
Output: Enhanced dialogue between host communities and IDPs on identification of durable solutions,
including through effective, functioning Peace Committees at the local level.
Output Indicator
Number of sessions and mediations conducted by the Peace Committees and other humanitarian actors.
Number of documented success stories on reconciliation facilitated by the Peace Committee members.
27
Awaiting Presidential Assent
91
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output: Increased understanding and acceptance among opinion leaders on the need for returns,
reintegration and/or resettlement to be voluntary and to take place in safety and dignity.
Output Indicator
Number of capacity building exercises conducted.
Disaggregated data on the number of profiled integrated IDPs and assessment of their needs and
vulnerabilities.
Output: Enhanced joint protection needs assessments conducted
Output Indicator
Number of assessments conducted, consolidated, analysed and shared.
Output: Response to identified protection needs is implemented in a coordinated and timely manner.
Output Indicator
Number of coordinated response activities implemented on the ground.
Table of proposed coverage per location
Geographic
Location
Counties
Nakuru, Turkana and Garisa
Nakuru, Garissa, Uasin Gishu
Kilifi, Kwale, Machakos, Kisumu, Homa
Bay Bondo, Tharaka Nithi, Nairobi
Nakuru, Kericho, Laikipia, Narok, Uasin
Gishu, Bomet, Nandi, West Pokot,
Baringo, Trans Nzoia
Nakuru, Taita Taveta
Nairobi, Garssa and Turkana
Uasin Gishu and Elgoyo Marakwet
Nairobi, Mombasa, Kisumu, Uasin Gishu
and Nakuru
Nairobi, Trans Nzoia, Mombasa etc
(Monitors)
PROTECTION
NRC, Save the Children, UNFPA
SC
Plan, UNFPA
PPF, UNFPA
IDGP
RCK
Centre for Human Rights and Governance
MOJCCA-NALEAP, UNFPA
KNCHR
92
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Shelter and Non-Food Items
Sector lead agency
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MIGRATION
Co-lead Agency
KRC
Funds required
$14,899,486 for 7 projects [2 IOM, Samaritan, UNICEF, HelpAge, NRC, Kenya
Red Cross Society]
Contact information
Sharif AHMED, sahmed1@iom.int
People in need and target beneficiaries
Number of people in need
Beneficiaries targeted in sector’s
EHRP projects (end-year target)
Category of
people in need
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
IDPs
250,000
150,000
400,000
150,000
90,000
240,000
Returnees
150,000
100,000
250,000
120,000
50,000
170,000
270,000
140,000
410,000
Host communities
Totals
60,000
400,000
250,000
710,000
Explanation of number of beneficiaries targeted
The Shelter/NFIs Response Plan is based on the forecasted El Nino event and the upcoming
general elections planned for March 2013 while taking into account other causes of displacement.
As such, the number for shelter vulnerable populations is estimated from the records of the 2007
post-election violence impact and the relevant response experience, while the number for the
projected El Nino is estimated from the response to the impact of the 2009 El Nino. Shelters,
alongside security, are the most important factors in stabilizing population flows and providing
IDPs and humanitarian stakeholders with the capacity to find and implement durable solutions.
Thus this sector will strive to incorporate other sectors to minimize human suffering resulting from
displacements, loss of shelter, and other household belongings. Furthermore, this will involve
preparedness strategy to increase the stocks of emergency shelter kits and standardizing the
NFIs to an estimated 15,000 families and 6,500 households predicted to be displaced by the El
Nino and political and ethnic clashes respectively.
How the sector response plan will contribute to the strategic objectives (refer to annex
attached)
The optimum coordination and the collaboration among the sector actors, including stakeholders
and donors, will secure the effective contribution to achieve the strategic objectives. The
response plan will be built on available capacities in conjunction with the most likely scenario and
arrangements to fill possible gaps between these two. Needs assessments will be conducted
and the response plan will be regularly monitored and updated. Needs assessments will consider
the comparison of the present response mechanism and the mechanisms used during previous
contingency responses. The needs will also be conducted on previous experiences in Kenya and
standards applied in humanitarian emergencies. This will help the enhancement of the capacities
both for the government and partners teams.
93
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Strategic objective #1
The humanitarian needs of highly vulnerable populations affected by natural and man-made
disasters are met through life-saving assistance and protection as per national and international
standards.
i)
Response Strategy
The phases of response will be set in three stages;



1-3 months (immediate onset after a disaster) - distribution of NFIs and plastic sheeting
for shelter.
3-6 months, (uncertainty of displaced people returning to their homes) - distribution of
tents and provision of transitional shelter.
6 months and beyond (no indication of the displaced people returning home) provision of
transitional shelter.
In accordance to the strategic objectives set for 2013, NFI kits and shelter materials shall be
prepositioned in preparation for emergencies in order to meet the life-saving criteria.
ii)
Assessments
Appropriate assessments shall be conducted before, during and after the El Nino and the general
elections, to provide necessary data for response needs and aim to integrate early warning-early
response mechanisms. Baseline surveys and risk assessments shall be conducted before the
emergencies; rapid needs household assessments during the emergency; and impact
assessment, post-disaster needs assessment and post-conflict needs assessment after the
emergencies.
iii)
Pre-positioning
Part of the challenges faced in previous emergencies has been the lack of adequate response
items to respond to disasters beforehand. Therefore, the sector will aim to pre-position shelter
and NFI kits in the identified 7/8 field hubs across the country. The items pre-positioned will
depend on the estimated figure based on the contingency plan, and actual number of people in
need of humanitarian aid. Existing stocks shall be established after a mapping exercise of the
partners, as well as storage capacities, parameters and location for storage of the pre-positioned
items. In addition, the kits will be pre-positioned in accordance to the agreed standards, as well
as service agreements to standardize costs for the kits. A transition strategy will also be
developed such that the NFIs pre-positioned do not exceed the appropriate response timeframe.
iv)
Beneficiary selection
According to the contingency plan, it is estimated that between 400,000- 450,000 people will be
affected. However, not all will be in need of humanitarian aid. Thus, appropriate beneficiary
selection is crucial, in order to target the right beneficiaries during response. Proper tools and
systems shall be put in place for profiling of beneficiaries in actual need of assistance. The sector
shall also participate in joint assessments and needs quantification.
94
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Strategic objective #2
Communities have enhanced resilience, reducing the impact of disasters, and lessened chronic
vulnerability by means of DRR and early recovery approaches.
i)
Community Participation
Engagement of the community throughout the process is key to ensuring sustainability and
durable actions, and subsequently contributing to building resilience and coping mechanisms of
the communities. The aspect of community engagement will be incorporated during project
design, beneficiary selection and project implementation.
ii)
Encourage cash-learning concepts
In some cases, disasters might occur simultaneously in the same regions, and affect the same
beneficiaries. The assistance hence provided in this case in terms of NFIs could be given to
beneficiaries already in receipt of assistance. To avoid two-fold assistance, cash-learning
concepts will be encouraged through cash vouchers to promote cash-for-work initiatives. Rental
grants will also be provided as an alternative to transitional shelter or other more permanent
shelter solutions.
iii)
iv)
Linkage with public private partnerships.
Integration with existing plans.
Several policies and bills have been passed given lessons learned from previous disasters, which
aim to address long-term solutions. The shelter sector strategy shall borrow from the IDP bill and
policy, national contingency plan and the field hubs.
Strategic objective #3
Increased commitment on the part of the GoK and development actors to address issues of
chronic vulnerability and provide durable solutions.
The optimum coordination and the collaboration among the sector actors, including stakeholders
and donors, will secure the effective contribution to achieve the strategic objectives. The
response plan will continue building on available capacities in conjunction with the most likely
scenario and arrangements to fill possible gaps between these two. This will help the
enhancement of the capacities both for the government and partners teams.
Cross-cutting issues:
i)
Environmental sensitivity
The proposed shelter plans should aim to offer a habitable and secure living space, as well as a
healthy living environment with privacy and dignity. It is important to bear in mind that transitional
shelter is a short-term intervention with a long-term impact on the recovery process that
anticipates environmental protection and/or restoration. This means that emphasis will also be
placed on the requirement that the constructed shelters offer preferable options i.e., upgradeable,
reusable, resalable or recyclable.
95
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
ii)
Coordination
Coordination is paramount in ensuring coherent responses across various stakeholders. In this
regard, this shall be observed through the setting up of action plans and information sharing with
both sector partners and external partners on a regular basis. Displacement tracking systems will
also be established based on lessons learned from the previous crises and most recent
Information Management developments, as well as identification of partners and establishment of
collaborative links in preparedness for displacement; engagement in inclusive coordination
mechanisms; and identification of pre-positioned items according to agreed standards across the
spectrum of potential responders in the shelter sector.
iii)
Linkage with other sectors
Shelter and NFI needs cut across other sectors, i.e. camp set up and distribution of tents in
linkage with CCCM sector; shelter set up, in consideration of GBV issues - protection sector;
shelter for refugee host communities - multi- sector for refugees; sanitation of shelter set upsWASH sector; etc.
iv)
Capacity building
Continuous capacity building shall be engaged across all levels: capacity building of local
communities through engagement in implementation; capacity building of local administration,
policymakers and actors through trainings and workshops.
v)
Resource management and advocacy
Pre-positioning can only be made possible with available resources and adequate funding.
Discussions are already in place with donors, and engagement with the media will also play a key
role.
Sector objectives and output targets
Strategic objective 1
The humanitarian needs of highly vulnerable populations affected by natural and man-made
disasters are met through life-saving assistance and protection as per national and international
standards.
Sector objective 1
To ensure vulnerable families have safe, adequate shelter, goods and supplies necessary to
meet their shelter, food preparation and personal hygiene needs until more durable solutions are
achieved.
Output 1: Shelter emergency capacities are identified within hotspot areas
Output Indicator
2013 target
Areas of potential displacement are mapped.
70%
Rapid needs assessments that take into account the specific needs of women, girls,
boys and men, and are conducted in situations of displacement.
60%
96
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output Indicator
2013 target
Shelter plans are agreed upon with local authorities and IDPs communities, using
participatory methods that ensure the participation and representation of women and
marginalized populations in decision-making processes.
80%
Output 2: Sufficient covered living space is identified for specified displaced populations
Output Indicator
2013 target
Affected individuals have a minimum covered floor area per person.
70%
Shelter solutions and materials meet technical and performance standards.
80%
Shelter solutions and materials are culturally appropriate and address needs of
vulnerable and marginalized groups.
60%
Output 3: Shelter solutions are responsive to the needs of host communities
Output Indicator
2013 target
Host communities’ needs are considered and incorporated in the shelter plans.
80%
Displaced populations are hosted in suitable locations and not in host community public
spaces, particularly schools, i.e., alternative locations as soon as feasible.
100%
Committees are established to facilitate dialogue between displaced and host
communities organizing natural resources management.
100%
Output 4: Shelter solutions are environmentally appropriate
Output Indicator
2013 target
Environmental assessments are included in shelter plans and environmental impacts are
mitigated.
80%
Construction techniques and materials are in accordance with international
environmental rules and restrictions applied at local levels.
100%
NFI needs of displaced populations and host communities are assessed, including
assessment of the specific needs of women, girls, boys, men, and the elderly, unwell and
disabled.
80%
Strategic objective 2
Communities have enhanced resilience, reducing the impact of disasters, and lessened chronic
vulnerability by means of DRR and early recovery approaches.
Sector objective 2
Shelter construction, rehabilitation, and non-food item distribution activities are designed to
mitigate conflict dynamics, environmental impact, and employment needs of displaced and host
communities.
Output 1: NFI kits and plans are in place proportional to the expected displaced populations
Output Indicator
2013 target
Effects of displacement on the local natural environment are addressed through
97
70%
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output Indicator
2013 target
environmental management and rehabilitation activities, where appropriate.
The displaced communities are involved in the NFI plans using participatory methods
where equitable participation is ensured in decision-making processes and that NFIs are
culture and context appropriate.
70%
Output 2: All households or community groups have the skills, knowledge and resources necessary for
shelter maintenance
Output Indicator
2013 target
All households or community groups have access to tools and equipment to safely
undertake construction, maintenance or debris removal tasks where required.
80%
All households or community groups have access to training and awareness- raising in
the safe use of tools and fixings provided.
80%
Output 3: Affected populations have access to employment and market opportunities associated within
shelter planning, construction, and maintenance
Output Indicator
2013 target
Number of affected populations (disaggregated by sex, age and group) involved for
shelter planning, construction and maintenance activities.
30%
Number of affected populations (disaggregated by sex, age and group) hired for
associated activities such as transportation and translation.
25%
Number of public tenders aimed at local suppliers.
20%
Number of local suppliers contracted for shelter related services.
50%
Strategic objective 3
Increased commitment on the part of the GoK and development actors to address issues of
chronic vulnerability and provide durable solutions.
Sector objective 3
Support the government authorities to effectively respond to shelter and NFI needs for the
vulnerable communities and enhance sustainable response mechanisms.
Output 1: Local authorities enhanced capacities
Output Indicator
2013 target
All officials at municipal and village level have the knowledge and ability to implement
rules that protect the shelter resilience.
All official at affected
locations
Order-keeping staff are well trained on human rights and use of force against civilians
and unarmed demonstrations.
Chiefs of order bodies
at affected location
Output 2: Well-trained community leaders.
Output Indicator
2013 target
Displaced communities are organized for emergency need and a dissemination system
is put in place.
At least 2 per location
Community leaders representing their neighbourhoods are organized and are in contact
with official and shelter management team.
At least 5 per location
98
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output 3: Improved basic services
Output Indicator
2013 target
Basic service team has surveyed the drainage and drinking water networks and identified
and addressed the defects.
All rebuilt shelters
All shelters and population have access to sustainable basic services.
All rebuilt shelters
Output 4: Reported investigation of cause and situation
Output Indicator
2013 target
Specialized committees representing all involved parties are established.
1 per impacted
location
A neutral committee is established to assess and report on damages to individual
shelters.
1 per impacted
location
Output 5: Non-governmental and neutral actors
Output Indicator
2013 target
Committees are to confirm damage assessments
n/a
Committee to estimate the needs for chronic vulnerability and durable solutions
n/a
Top-priority actions, beneficiaries, and locations



Actions: pre-positioning, shelter construction, logistics, online tools and others.
Beneficiaries: 270,000 females, 140,000 males, 410,000 in total,
Locations: Eldoret, Garissa, Lodwar, Marsabit/Isiolo, Mombasa, Nairobi, Nakuru and
others.
Table of proposed coverage per location
Geographic
Location
SHELTER AND NFI
Hot spots hubs
Eldoret
IOM
TOTAL:
1
Baringo
UNICEF
TOTAL:
1
UNICEF
TOTAL:
1
Homabay
UNICEF
TOTAL:
1
Isiolo
UNICEF
TOTAL:
1
Kisii
UNICEF
TOTAL:
1
Kisumu
UNICEF
TOTAL:
1
IOM
UNICEF
IOM
UNICEF
UNICEF
IOM, UNICEF, HelpAge
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
1
1
1
1
1
3
Garissa
Lodwar
Mandera
Marsabit
Meru
Migori
Mombasa
99
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Moyale
Mwranga
Nairobi
Nakuru
Siaya
Tana River
Busia
Wajir
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
TOTAL:
UNICEF
UNICEF
UNICEF, HelpAge
IOM, NRC, UNICEF, HelpAge
UNICEF
UNICEF
UNICEF
UNICEF
1
1
2
4
1
1
1
1
Water, Sanitation and Hygiene
Sector lead agency
UNICEF, in support of:
MoWI and MoPHS
Funds required
$29,268,216 for 24 projects
Contact information
Jane Maonga-Jones, WASH Sector Coordinator (jmaonga@unicef.org)
Eliud Wamwangi, WESCOORD Secretariat Chair (ekagema@yahoo.com)
People in need and target beneficiaries
Beneficiaries targeted in sector’s
EHRP projects (end-year target)
Number of people in need
Category of people in
need
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total
Emergency-affected
people
1,000,000
1,100,000
2,100,000
1,000,00
0
1,100,000
2,100,000
Internally Displaced
People
90,000
60,000
150,000
90,000
60,000
150,000
Totals
1,,090,000
1,160,000
2,250,000
Explanation of number of beneficiaries targeted
The target beneficiaries for the WASH sector includes: populations living in drought-prone areas,
flood-affected areas and conflict-prone areas. Many of these areas are also prone to outbreaks
of WASH-related disease such as malaria, cholera, typhoid and other diarrheal diseases particularly during the rainy season. School children were also considered in the target
beneficiaries as well as patients in health facilities, as access to WASH facilities will ensure that
they have the means to protect themselves from WASH-related diseases.
Sector objectives and output targets
Strategic objective #1
The humanitarian needs of highly vulnerable populations affected by natural and man-made
disasters are met through life-saving assistance and protection as per national and international
standards.
Sector objective 1.1
Improved access to safe, adequate and sustainable water supply, appropriate sanitation and
hygiene means to populations affected by floods, drought, conflict and WASH-related disease
outbreaks.
100
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Expected outcome: Reduced incidence of WASH-related diseases amongst emergency-affected
populations.
Output Indicator i)
2013 target
Proportion of emergency-affected population with access to at least 7.5 litres
per person per day of water from safe communal water supply sources
100% of men, women and
children in target areas
Output Indicator ii)
2013 target
Proportion of emergency-affected population with access to sanitation facilities
to enable safe excreta disposal practices
60% of men, women and
children in target areas
Output Indicator iii)
2013 target
Number of children with access to reliable water, sanitation and hand-washing
facilities in targeted school institutions
399,412 school children in
targeted schools
Strategic objective #2
Communities have enhanced resilience, reducing the impact of disasters, and lessened chronic
vulnerability by means of DRR and early recovery approaches.
Sector objective 2.1
Increased capacity for emergency-affected communities to use and maintain communal water,
sanitation and hygiene facilities sustainably; and capacity to plan for future hazards.
Output Indicator i)
2013 target
Number of water management committees established and trained in target
communities
At least 100 water committees
Output Indicator ii)
2013 target
Proportion of health and school institutions that have access to rain water
harvesting and storage tanks.
60% of targeted institutions
Output Indicator iii)
2013 target
Number of WESCOORD officers that are trained in emergency preparedness/
contingency planning
At least 200 WESCOORD officers
Strategic objective #3
Increased commitment on the part of the GoK and development actors to address issues of
chronic vulnerability and provide durable solutions.
Sector objective 3.1
Formalized roles of Government WASH ministries/ departments, with humanitarian WASH
partners on the coordination of WASH interventions.
101
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Output Indicator i)
2013 target
Formal agreement between the key Government WASH ministries, the sector
lead agency and humanitarian WASH partners
Signed partnership agreement
Number of activated WESCOORDs at sub-national levels
24 emergency-affected counties
102
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Top-priority actions, beneficiaries, and locations
Actions:
 Provide operational and structural capacity support to WASH sector coordination
mechanism (WESCOORD) at national and sub-national levels in line with the planned
devolved government structures. This will also require that linkages are strengthened
between the two government WASH ministries (MoPHS and MoWI) and UNICEF; as well
as those between development and humanitarian WASH actors in order to improve
coordination of WASH interventions.
 The WASH sector will also prioritize disaster preparedness in order to build community
resilience and reinforce the coping capacities of local communities to ensure timely and
appropriate response to a disaster. This will include capacity building of key WASH
coordination staff at district/county levels in contingency planning.
 The sector will continue to promote the use of local technology/solutions in WASH
infrastructures, e.g. rain water harvesting and storage tanks, latrine designs and
household water filters. Enhanced rainfall expected during the short rain season will lead
to increased water levels for both surface and ground water supply sources, and will be
an opportunity to promote the use of simple local technologies for rain water harvesting
and storage.
 The sector will also support the involvement of beneficiaries (including men, women,
children and vulnerable groups) in planning and implementation of WASH projects. This
will involve the use of participatory approaches in hygiene and sanitation promotion,
and phased-out community consultations for water projects to increase community
ownership. To ensure sustainability of water sources, the sector will also promote
establishment of community management structures to maintain WASH facilities.
 WASH partners will give priority to provision of water for human consumption. However,
consideration will be given for competing demands for domestic water supply, especially
from livestock and agriculture.
Beneficiaries:
The WASH Sector will target 2.25 million beneficiaries in 2013, including: people affected by
floods and WASH-related diseases, internally displaced people and those affected by conflict,
and people living in areas affected by drought.
Locations:
WESCOORD
Priority Counties
Garissa
Isiolo
Kilifi
Kisumu
Kwale
Laikipia
Mandera
Marsabit
Migori
Narok
Tana River
Wajir
West Pokot
Baringo
Busia
Kajiado
Conflict
Risks
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Flooding Risks
High
Low
Moderate
High
Moderate
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
High
Moderate
Low
Low
High
Low
103
Likelihood of WASH-related disease
outbreaks
High
Low
Moderate
High
Low
Low
High
Moderate
High
Moderate
High
High
Low
Low
High
Low
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
WESCOORD
Priority Counties
Kitui
Makueni
Samburu
Taita Taveta
Kitui
Tharaka
Turkana
Machakos
Conflict
Risks
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Flooding Risks
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Likelihood of WASH-related disease
outbreaks
High
Moderate
Low
Low
Low
Low
Moderate
High
Table of proposed coverage per location
Geographic
Location (County)
Baringo
WASH
TOTAL:
3
TOTAL:
6
TOTAL:
17
TOTAL:
2
TOTAL:
4
TOTAL:
3
TOTAL:
6
TOTAL:
1
GAA
Norkenya, Save the Children, Christian Aid,
UNESCO, ACTED, UNICEF
CAFOD/Catholic Diocese of Marsabit, Christian
Community Services of Mount Kenya East, PISP,
KRCS, SOS Children’s’ Village Kenya, AMINA,
GEZA/ Samaritan Bund, Christian Aid, Caritas
Switzerland, GOAL, FFS, UNICEF
KRCS, Christian Aid/ Christian Community
Services, UNICEF
Caritas Switzerland, GAA, UNICEF
TOTAL:
1
TOTAL:
6
TOTAL:
12
TOTAL:
3
TOTAL:
3
HHRD, UNICEF
HHRD, Première Urgence, GAA, UNICEF,
UNESCO, Team & Team
KRCS
TOTAL:
2
TOTAL:
6
TOTAL:
1
TOTAL:
4
TOTAL:
10
Mwingi
ACTED, NRC, UNICEF, Oxfam
GIZ, Islamic Relief, JICA, Save the Children,
Oxfam, Norkenya, DIAL, Caritas, WCA, UNICEF
Mercy USA
TOTAL:
Nairobi slums
COOPI
TOTAL:
1
1
West Pokot
ACTED
TOTAL:
1
Garissa
Isiolo
Kajiado
Kitui
Kwale
Samburu
Machakos
Makueni
Mandera
Marsabit
Moyale
Mwingi
Narok
Tana River
Tharaka North
Turkana
Wajir
ACTED, World Vision Kenya (WVK), UNICEF
JICA, HHRD, Mercy USA, Première Urgence,
World Concern, UNICEF
ACF, CAFOD, HHRD, IMC, KRCS, LVIA, Caritas,
UNICEF, VSF-Suisse, Christian Aid, CPI, WCDO,
UNESCO, NRC, Mercy USA, TdF, ACF
GAA, Mercy USA
CAFOD/Kitui Catholic Diocese, GAA, CARITAS
Switzerland, Mercy USA
Mercy USA, UNICEF
ACTED, CAFOD/Catholic Diocese of Maralal,
IMC, KRCS, WVK, UNICEF
World Cares
104
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Roles, responsibilities and linkages
Humanitarian partners will continue to support the preparedness and response efforts of the
Government of Kenya through the established coordination mechanisms as illustrated below. In
2013 the UN RC/HC will continue to lead the response of the international partners with the
support of the KHPT in line with the leadership of the Government of Kenya through the Ministry
of State for Special Programmes, the Crisis Response Centre, the National Disaster Operations
Centre, the National Drought Management Authority and the sector working groups (as illustrated
below). At a sub-national level, coordination will continue to be undertaken through Government
led fora including the District Steering Groups (DSGs) and the District Disaster Management
Committees (DDMCs).28
KENYA COORDINATION STRUCTURE
Government of Kenya
UN/NGO
National Drought
Management Authority
UN Humanitarian Coordinator
Crisis Response Center /
Ministry of State for Special
Programmes
Kenya Humanitarian
Partnership Team
National Disaster Operation
Center
AGRICULTURE AND
LIVESTOCK
Inter-Sector Working Group
EDUCATION
FOOD
MoE
MoSSP / KFSSG
Save the Children /
UNICEF
WFP
MoA, MoLD
FAO
PROTECTION:
UNHCR
MoJ, KNCHR,
Sub Working Groups
Child Protection: UNICEF
HEALTH
NUTRITION
MoPHS / MoMS
MoPHS
WHO
UNICEF
Multi-sector/
refugees
WASH
MoWI/MoPHS
UNICEF
MoSIRP- DRA
UNHCR
NFI/Shelter
MoSSP
IOM
Cross-cutting issues: Gender (UN Women), PSEA (KRCS/OCHA), GBV (UNFPA) Age (HelpAge), Disability
(CBM), Early Recovery (MoSSP/UNDP), HIV/AIDS (IOM, UNHCR, UNAIDS)
For the purposes of contingency planning in the run-up to forthcoming elections, eight support
hubs have been identified to provide field level support to preparedness activities in areas at risk
of inter-communal violence. The intention is to provide support to sub-national coordination
28
These mechanisms will be aligned with the county structures
105
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
structures to harmonise analysis, to identify response capacities and to address gaps. The
location and coverage of the hubs are shown in the map below.
Cross-cutting issues
Over the past eighteen months, the Inter-Sector Working Group has prioritized the improved
integration of cross-cutting issues (specifically concerns related to age, gender, disability, GBV,
PSEA, HIV/AIDS and early recovery) in humanitarian response and preparedness activities. As
such, a group of focal points from organisations with issue specific expertise have formed a subgroup of the ISWG to provide technical support for preparedness and response planning and
capacity-building to sectors in the form of guidance and expertise. The group has particularly
focused on areas of complementarity in order to provide, where possible, coordinated
engagement with sectors and partners.
Early recovery as a cross-cutting issue
Early recovery is a multidimensional process of recovery which applies development principles to
humanitarian settings. It aims at stabilizing a humanitarian situation by identifying opportunities
for longer-term recovery and development, and by supporting, sustaining and rebuilding local and
national capacities to prevent further deterioration. Recovery planning and development
programming are initiated as early as possible during humanitarian operations, minimizing the
gap between the end of relief and the start of longer-term recovery.
While early recovery was established as a stand-alone, vertical structure, recently it has been
recognized as a cross-cutting issue. It has been noted that early recovery is an approach to
humanitarian action that should be integrated into the work of all humanitarian actors to ensure
the dividends of humanitarian response are sustainable and to mitigate the potential impact of
future crises. Early recovery is a responsibility of all, and should be integrated into the activities
of all sectors. It should not be considered as a single, separate sector simply focusing on early
recovery projects.
Early recovery strategies
As early recovery was primarily handled as a separate sector, the sector working group initially
had more than 40 members. However, with early recovery now considered as a cross-cutting
issue, there has been a need to restructure the sector working group and form an ‘early recovery
focal points network’ for advocacy, managing certain early recovery projects and monitoring on
how early recovery is being integrated in different sectors and their projects. As other crosscutting issues such as gender, HIV/AIDS, do not have a separate working group and since
several of the previous sector working group members were also members of other sectors, it
was pointed out that there was little need for early recovery to keep a sector working group when
it should address all sectors. Yet, because early recovery continues to have specific projects
under it, abolishing the entire network would not be the most appropriate action to take.
The Early Recovery sector had already been working closely with the other cross-cutting issues,
and will focus more on developing more materials when engaging with other sectors to ensure
that all projects include early recovery components. Following the Gender example, efforts will
be made towards developing a brief and accessible guidance note for early recovery.
Using early recovery best practices, advocacy for and raising awareness on early recovery as a
cross-cutting issue will be strengthened.
106
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
In 2012, focal points in several issues areas have supported a number of national and sub
national sector trainings; have participated in assessment and information gathering missions;
and have provided expertise for contingency planning and the EHRP process. In addition the
focal points have provided guidance on the Kenya Initial Rapid Assessment (KIRA) process
contributing to tool development and training of partners.
In 2013, the focal points will continue to engage in inter-agency processes and with specific
partners towards further improving the integration of cross-cutting concerns. This will be
important across the three strategic priorities of the EHRP.
Early recovery priority issues for 2013






Continue to raise awareness amongst all humanitarian and development actors on early
recovery as a process/cross-cutting issue.
Maintain the Early Recovery focal points network and ensure that early recovery is
integrated into different sectors’ projects.
Collect relevant information and data regarding early recovery and accumulate knowledge
and best practices in Kenya.
Strengthen the links between the humanitarian sectors and development actors.
Reduce the impact of emergencies and build resilience of communities to resist the worst
impacts of emergency situations, with particular focus on the 2013 elections and drought
related crises.
Act as a champion with OCHA of cross-cutting issues to ensure that all cross-cutting
issues remain on the humanitarian agenda, are integrated into humanitarian plans and
response, and can (somehow) be measured.
107
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
ANNEX I: 3W KENYA MAPS
108
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
109
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
110
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
111
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
112
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
113
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
114
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
ANNEX II: LIST OF PROJECTS
Table IV: List of Projects (grouped by sector)
Kenya Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan 2013
as of 15 November 2012
Project code
(click on hyperlinked
project code to open full
project details)
Title
Appealing agency Requirements
($)
Priority
AGRICULTURE AND LIVESTOCK
KEN-13/A/53118/5059
Livelihoods Protection and Enhancement Program
Chr. Aid
1,016,500
HIGH
KEN-13/A/54087/5006
Enhancing Capacities of Rural Communities Towards
Improved Preparedness and Resilience to Drought
DWHH
300,899
HIGH
KEN-13/A/54160/7998
Enhancing Community Resilience to Drought in Garissa
County
WCDO
852,900
HIGH
KEN-13/A/54201/5167
Support to agricultural production and post harvest
management for improved food security in South eastern
marginal Districts of Kenya (Eastern Province)
COOPI
1,324,240
HIGH
KEN-13/A/54205/5167
Strengthening Community Managed Drought Risk
Reduction in Northern Kenya
COOPI
500,000
HIGH
KEN-13/A/54216/6458
Livelihood support to vulnerable (agro) pastoral
communities of Mandera, West Pokot, Baringo, Turkana
and Samburu
ACTED
2,439,907
HIGH
KEN-13/A/55900/5587
Livelihood driven conflict management project in Turkana
VSF (Germany)
650,000
HIGH
KEN-13/A/56093/298
Strengthening resilience to and mitigating drought and
conflict effects on pastoral and host communities in
northern Kenya
IOM
1,533,667
HIGH
KEN-13/A/56093/5105
Strengthening resilience to and mitigating drought and
conflict effects on pastoral and host communities in
northern Kenya
UNIFEM
1,533,667
HIGH
KEN-13/A/56093/776
Strengthening resilience to and mitigating drought and
conflict effects on pastoral and host communities in
northern Kenya
UNDP
1,533,667
HIGH
KEN-13/A/56174/15103
combating drought and enhancing community Resillience.
Southern Aid
384,000
HIGH
KEN-13/A/56217/123
Support to protecting and rebuilding of livestock assets
(disease control, feed)
FAO
4,300,000
HIGH
KEN-13/A/56221/123
Enhanced food security through improved post harvest
handling and storage
FAO
596,000
HIGH
KEN-13/A/56225/123
Support to crop production activities including seed
provision of drought
FAO
2,690,000
HIGH
KEN-13/A/56232/123
Support to activities that enhance community resilience
FAO
2,550,000
HIGH
KEN-13/A/56258/123
Promote urban and peri urban agriculture
FAO
750,000
MEDIUM
KEN-13/A/56352/6116
Support to agriculture and livestock livelihoods in Tana
River, Kwale and Kitui
Samaritan's
Purse
955,328
HIGH
KEN-13/A/56897/5328
Community Support for Enhanced Drought Resilience and DanChurchAid/D
Mitigation
CA
500,000
HIGH
115
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Project code
(click on hyperlinked
project code to open full
project details)
Title
Appealing agency Requirements
($)
KEN-13/CSS/54193/6458
Strengthening drought vulnerability monitoring in Arid and
Semi-Arid Lands of Kenya (ASALs)
ACTED
KEN-13/CSS/56265/123
Support early warning, food security information and
coordination
FAO
Sub total for AGRICULTURE AND LIVESTOCK
Priority
300,001
HIGH
1,210,000
HIGH
25,920,776
COORDINATION
KEN-13/CSS/55659/13139
Enabling Effective Security Management and Emergency
Preparedness for Humanitarian Agencies in Kenya
RedR UK
KEN-13/CSS/56157/119
Support to Coordination of Humanitarian Assistance in
Kenya
KEN-13/CSS/56167/7749
315,150
HIGH
OCHA
1,916,326
HIGH
Devolution of Disaster Risk Management in Kenya.
UNISDR AFRICA
1,000,000
HIGH
KEN-13/S/52471/5139
Enhanced UNDSS Capacity in NEP, Kenya
UNDSS
295,230
HIGH
KEN-13/S/52723/5139
Enhanced Security Capacity for elections
UNDSS
505,650
HIGH
Sub total for COORDINATION
4,032,356
EARLY RECOVERY
KEN-13/ER/53219/5104
Strengthening long-term resilience to recurrent droughts
among communities in Arid and Semi Arid regions of
Kenya
ILO
KEN-13/ER/53966/7730
Skills Development and Micro-Enterprise Creation
Support for Marginalized Women and Youth in Wajir
District
DIAL
KEN-13/ER/54171/7998
Garissa Sustainable Livelihood and Economic
Development Project
WCDO
KEN-13/ER/54178/15553
Building host community resilience, disaster preparedness
through capacity building, restoration of livelihood,
NORKENYA
reduction of small arms proliferation (SALW) in Mandera
(along the KENYA-SOMALIA border)
KEN-13/ER/54197/6458
Building Disaster Preparedness and Resilience for
Vulnerable (agro) pastoral populations in the Arid and
Semi Arid Lands of Kenya
KEN-13/ER/55544/298
12,840,000
MEDIUM
428,270
HIGH
1,067,527
HIGH
555,180
HIGH
ACTED
2,185,868
HIGH
Securing peace through resilience-building and
preparedness
IOM
1,267,950
HIGH
KEN-13/ER/55911/5186
Improving access to food and nutrition security to
vulnerable and female headed households in Merti
District, Isiolo County
ACF
291,250
HIGH
KEN-13/ER/56351/776
Building Host Community Resilience Through Restoration
UNDP
of Livelihoods, Peace Building and Disaster Preparedness
647,350
MEDIUM
Sub total for EARLY RECOVERY
19,283,395
EDUCATION
KEN-13/E/53815/7730
EDUCATION SUPPORT THROUGH PROVISION OF
SAFE WATER AND HYGIENE PROMOTION IN ARID
SCHOOLS IN WAJIR SOUTH DISTRICT
DIAL
320,532
HIGH
KEN-13/E/56262/15103
ENHANCED ACCESS TO QUALITY EDUCATION FOR
SCHOOL AGED CHILDREN IN WAJIR AND GARISSA
COUNTIES
Southern Aid
370,000
HIGH
KEN-13/E/56269/124
Enhancing resilience of emergency affected children
through education
UNICEF
2,942,500
HIGH
116
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Project code
(click on hyperlinked
project code to open full
project details)
Title
Appealing agency Requirements
($)
Priority
KEN-13/E/56334/5390
Emergency Education for Disaster Affected Communities
Finnchurchaid
331,700
HIGH
KEN-13/E/56373/14960
NGO PEACE AWARENESS IN INFORMAL
SETTLEMENT
OMIK
185,535
HIGH
Sub total for EDUCATION
4,150,267
FOOD ASSISTANCE
KEN-13/CSS/55033/561
Humanitarian Air Service in Support of Relief Operations
in Kenya:
WFP
4,639,680
HIGH
KEN-13/F/55398/561
Protecting and Rebuilding Livelihoods in Arid and SemiArid Areas
WFP
131,480,916
HIGH
Sub total for FOOD ASSISTANCE
136,120,596
HEALTH
KEN-13/H/53913/7730
Support for Primary Health Care Delivery in Wajir District
DIAL
352,500
HIGH
KEN-13/H/55082/1171
Strengthening Emergency Reproductive Health Response
UNFPA
in Kenya
650,000
HIGH
KEN-13/H/55390/124
Emergency Response and disaster risk reduction to
vulnerable children and women in Kenya.
UNICEF
2,996,000
HIGH
KEN-13/H/55862/298
Strengthening preparedness, emergency response, and
pastoralist outreach capacities of health systems in
northern Kenya
IOM
2,273,429
HIGH
KEN-13/H/55950/122
Emergency health humanitarian response to the most
vulnerable populations and resilience capacity building for WHO
the newly devolved counties for the health sector in Kenya
4,654,500
HIGH
KEN-13/H/56094/298
Preventing sexual and gender based violence (SGBV)
and increasing access to HIV prevention, care and
treatment services during emergencies in Kenya
IOM
1,498,000
HIGH
KEN-13/H/56797/122
Emergency preparedness and response to reduce HIV
transmission risk, maintain continuity of life-saving HIV
services and provide safe blood supply in emergency
affected areas in Kenya
WHO
2,140,000
HIGH
KEN-13/H/56817/5195
Emergency Health Care for drought affected communities
in Turkana, Rift Valley Province, North Western Kenya
MERLIN
1,060,662
HIGH
Sub total for HEALTH
15,625,091
MULTI-SECTOR ASSISTANCE TO REFUGEES
KEN-13/E/56370/124
Education for refugee children in Kenya
UNICEF
3,103,000
HIGH
KEN-13/F/55030/561
Food Assistance to Refugees
WFP
149,672,346
HIGH
KEN-13/H/55391/124
UNICEFHealth Response to vulnerable children and
women in Dadaab and kakuma refugee camp.
UNICEF
963,000
HIGH
KEN-13/H/55825/124
Scale-up and maintain access to critical nutrition services
in refugee camps and host communities
UNICEF
586,360
HIGH
KEN-13/H/55973/122
Humanitarian health response for refugees in the Dadaab
and Kakuma refugee camps in Kenya
WHO
930,900
HIGH
KEN-13/MS/54199/5167
Emergency WASH interventions and Livelihood
Assistance to Refugees and Host communities.
COOPI
1,207,981
HIGH
KEN-13/MS/55539/298
Improved shelter and protection in Dadaab and
surrounding communities: Phase I
IOM
8,025,000
HIGH
117
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Project code
(click on hyperlinked
project code to open full
project details)
Title
Appealing agency Requirements
($)
KEN-13/MS/55546/298
Improved shelter and protection in Dadaab and
surrounding communities: Phase II
IOM
KEN-13/MS/56344/120
Protection and Mixed Solutions for refugees in Kenya
UNHCR
KEN-13/P-HR-RL/54740/5762
Protecting refugee children and their families in Kambioos
camp
KEN-13/P-HR-RL/55555/124
Supporting Child Protection and GBV prevention and
response in refugee camps and
Priority
12,759,750
HIGH
251,587,153
HIGH
Terre des
Hommes
2,000,000
HIGH
UNICEF
2,466,350
HIGH
Sub total for MULTI-SECTOR ASSISTANCE TO REFUGEES
433,301,840
NUTRITION
KEN-13/H/53618/14938
Support the ministry of medical services (MOMS) and the
ministry of public health and sanitation (MOPHS) to
strengthen the delivery of high impact interventions (HINI)
PAH
161,834
HIGH
KEN-13/H/53978/8058
Scaling up high impact interventions in Nutrition while
enhancing surveillance and response in Mandera ( North
& East) and Wajir (West and North).
IRW
799,611
HIGH
KEN-13/H/54517/124
Emergency Nutrition Response and Support to Increasing
Resilience in ASALs and Urban informal settlements in
Kenya
UNICEF
15,196,675
HIGH
KEN-13/H/54746/5762
Combating Mother and Child Malnutrition in Drought
Prone Lagdera District
Terre des
Hommes
800,000
HIGH
KEN-13/H/54756/12801
Enhancing accessibility to HINI and strengthen the
capacity of the community for disaster risk reduction and
improved response by building community resilience
MERCY - USA
2,853,502
HIGH
KEN-13/H/54761/6964
Scaling up high impact nutrition interventions Arid and
Semi Arid areas of Laisamis, Kitui and Kilifi
WVK
4,800,151
HIGH
KEN-13/H/55329/5160
Scale up of High Impact Nutrition Interventions (HiNi)for
improved Nutrition in women and children in Tana River,
Laikipia, Samburu, Isiolo and Meru North counties of
Kenya
IMC
2,094,149
HIGH
KEN-13/H/55456/561
Support to Supplementary Feeding for Moderately
Malnourished Childer under Five and Pregnant/Nursing
Women
WFP
14,677,725
HIGH
KEN-13/H/55684/5179
Scale up of High Impact Nutrition Interventions in Turkana
and Garissa Counties
IRC
2,000,000
HIGH
KEN-13/H/55858/5186
Scale up of High Impact Nutrition Interventions(HINI) in
Dadaab Host community
ACF
471,900
HIGH
KEN-13/H/56256/5186
: Reduce morbidity and mortality associated with acute
malnutrition and improve child and maternal health in
Garbatulla and Merti district- Isiolo County and West
Pokot County and Strengthen integrated nutrition surveys
and surveillance systems in ASAL areas of Kenya
ACF
2,034,025
HIGH
KEN-13/H/56272/8497
Supporting MOPHS/MOMS in scaling High Impact
nutrition intervetion in the Districts of Marsabit county
FH
KEN-13/H/56273/5195
Support the Ministry of Medical Services (MoMs) and the
Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation (MoPHS) in the
implementation of high impact nutrition interventions
(HiNi) in Turkana County.
MERLIN
KEN-13/H/56346/122
To reduce malnutrition related morbidity and mortality of
boys, girls and women through preventive and curative
WHO
actions to affected populations, including drought affected,
urban poor and displaced populations
118
850,000
MEDIUM
1,400,000
HIGH
722,290
HIGH
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Project code
(click on hyperlinked
project code to open full
project details)
Title
Appealing agency Requirements
($)
KEN-13/H/56368/6116
Prevention and treatment of acute malnutrition in children
under five years old and pregnant and lactating women
(PLW)
KEN-13/H/56789/8498
Samaritan's
Purse
Priority
288,315
HIGH
Scaling up High Impact Nutrition Interventions for Children
CW
and Women in Chalbi district of Masabit county
330,771
HIGH
KEN-13/H/56815/6516
Enhancing Red Cross Volunteer Network Capacity In
Emergency Nutrition Response And Resilience Initiatives
In Kenya
Kenya RC
832,933
HIGH
KEN-13/H/56829/8498
Scaling up High Impact Nutrition Interventions in the
Urban Slums of Nairobi and Kisumu
CW
396,980
HIGH
Sub total for NUTRITION
50,710,861
PROTECTION
Protecting children (boys and girls) affected by the
KEN-13/P-HR-RL/54750/5762 drought and victims of lack of care, malnutrition, and
abuse in Lagdera district.
KEN-13/P-HR-RL/55085/1171
Strengthening GBV response and coordination during
humanitarian emergencies in Kenya
Terre des
Hommes
UNFPA
Prevention and Response to child protection concerns
affecting girls and boys at risk of joining and connected to
the Streets due to emergencies (drought, conflicts and
KEN-13/P-HR-RL/55276/6079
SC
other vulnerabilities linked to poverty and social/family
breakdown) in the Uasin Gishu and Trans Nzoia in the Rift
Valley.
1,125,000
HIGH
700,000
HIGH
351,200
HIGH
KEN-13/P-HR-RL/55306/5524
Enhanced Capacity of Stakeholders in Child Protection in
Emergencies and Recovery Phase.
Plan
413,228
MEDIUM
KEN-13/P-HR-RL/55490/5536
Protecting older men and women affected by
humanitarian crises in Kenya such as
HelpAge
International
358,967
HIGH
KEN-13/P-HR-RL/55553/124
Child Protection in Emergencies: Prevention and
Response
UNICEF
2,755,250
MEDIUM
KEN-13/P-HR-RL/55691/298
Strengthening the provision of protection services to
vulnerable groups in Northern Kenya
IOM
1,588,950
HIGH
KEN-13/P-HR-RL/56082/298
Elections preparedness and response in affected regions
of Kenya.
IOM
2,300,500
HIGH
KEN-13/P-HRRL/56104/14414
Enhance community peace building and reconciliation
dialogues to mitigate electoral and resource based
conflicts and displacements in Uasin Gishu and
Elgeiyo/Marakwet Counties
CHRiG
355,000
HIGH
KEN-13/P-HR-RL/56229/8807
Protection through Legal Aid, Advocacy and
Peacebuilding
RCK
285,000
HIGH
Sub total for PROTECTION
10,233,095
SHELTER AND NON-FOOD ITEMS
KEN-13/CSS/55861/298
Shelter Cluster Coordination and Preparedness
IOM
378,780
HIGH
KEN-13/S-NF/55029/5834
Enhance the Protection of IDP returnees and host
community in Molo, Njoro and Kuresoi through peace
building initiatives and pre positioning of emergency
shelter kits and NFIs
NRC
2,700,000
HIGH
KEN-13/S-NF/55547/298
Emergency shelter and preparedness for internally
displaced persons (IDPs) and host communities
IOM
3,557,750
HIGH
119
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Project code
(click on hyperlinked
project code to open full
project details)
Title
Appealing agency Requirements
($)
Priority
KEN-13/S-NF/56056/124
Provision of Emergency NFI Family Kits to Displaced
Populations
UNICEF
1,005,800
HIGH
KEN-13/S-NF/56361/6116
NFI Emergency Preparedness Program
Samaritan's
Purse
1,594,832
HIGH
KEN-13/S-NF/56369/5536
Support to households with vulnerable older people during HelpAge
and after Kenya’s 2013 election
International
309,508
HIGH
KEN-13/S-NF/56990/6516
Emergency Shelter
5,352,816
HIGH
Kenya RC
Sub total for SHELTER AND NON-FOOD ITEMS
14,899,486
WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE
KEN-13/WS/53059/5059
Enhancement of Access to Proper WASH services in
Mandera, Marsabit and Isiolo County
Chr. Aid
KEN-13/WS/53553/8769
Drought Recovery in 8 Villages in Wajir, North-Eastern
Province, Kenya
Caritas
Switzerland
KEN-13/WS/53622/8502
Samburu WASH Humanitarian Response and Recovery
Project
791,800
HIGH
1,105,686
HIGH
WVI
725,297
HIGH
KEN-13/WS/53785/15553
Improved access to safe, adequate WASH(e) to
community households, schools and health centres in the
arid and conflict affected areas along the KENYASOMALIA border
NORKENYA
465,578
HIGH
KEN-13/WS/53788/8769
Drought Recovery in 8 Villages in Marsabit, Eastern
Province, Kenya
Caritas
Switzerland
1,223,543
HIGH
KEN-13/WS/53803/7730
PROMOTING ACCESS TO SAFE WATER, SANITATION
AND HYGIENE FOR VULNERABLE COMMUNITIES IN
WAJIR SOUTH DISTRICT
DIAL
298,658
HIGH
KEN-13/WS/53894/124
GoK/UNICEF WASH Emergency Response Project
UNICEF
6,850,000
HIGH
KEN-13/WS/53898/124
WASH Refugee & Host Community Emergency Response
UNICEF
Project
995,100
HIGH
KEN-13/WS/54127/5006
Resilience Enhancement for Rural Communities in Tana
River County
DWHH
507,082
HIGH
KEN-13/WS/54155/7998
WCDO Danyere Water and Sanitation Project
WCDO
677,848
HIGH
KEN-13/WS/54166/7790
Emergency WASH Response Programme
GOAL
947,220
HIGH
KEN-13/WS/54198/6458
Providing Water, Sanitation and Hygiene assistance to
vulnerable communities in Mandera, Samburu, West
Pokot, Baringo and Turkana Counties.
ACTED
3,727,866
KEN-13/WS/54203/5167
Provision of water, sanitation and hygiene facilities to
reduce vulnerability and risk exposure of Nairobi informal
settlements communities (Huruma and Mathare informal
settlements, Starehe Constituency, Nairobi)
COOPI
400,180
HIGH
KEN-13/WS/54217/5186
Emergency Water, Sanitation and Hygiene assistance
against cholera outbreaks at Dadaab’ host community
ACF
788,000
HIGH
KEN-13/WS/54222/12801
Improved access to safe and adequate Drinking Water,
Sanitation Facilities and Hygiene Promotion to
emergency-affected communities with a focus on health
facilities
MERCY - USA
1,978,587
MEDIUM
KEN-13/WS/54320/5103
Rapid identification and development of shallow and deep
groundwater for emergency water supply in Kenya’s Arid
lands
UNESCO
2,887,500
HIGH
120
MEDIUM
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Project code
(click on hyperlinked
project code to open full
project details)
Title
Appealing agency Requirements
($)
KEN-13/WS/54709/15557
PROMOTING ACCESS TO SAFE WATER, SANITATION
AND HYGIENE IN SCHOOLS FOR VULNERABLE
COMMUNITIES FOR ENHANCED SCHOOL
PERFORMANCE IN NGARE MARA, ISIOLO COUNTY
CPI
KEN-13/WS/54807/5762
Improving access to WASH services in drought-prone
Lagdera district
Terre des
Hommes
KEN-13/WS/55052/5834
Dadaab and Kakuma Host Community Water Project
Priority
298,132
HIGH
1,573,000
HIGH
NRC
509,855
HIGH
KEN-13/WS/55216/14950
Building Sustainability and Resilience by enahncing water
storage and quality through water harvesting, water
treatment and improving hygiene and sanitation
practices through latrine constructiion, sanitation and
hygiene promotion.
WCA
328,245
HIGH
KEN-13/WS/55304/6918
Improve access to safe water, sanitation services and
hygiene practices prioritizing recovery and resiliencebuilding in communities in Isiolo County (Isiolo, Merti,
Sericho, Kom and Cherab Divisions)
LVIA
390,250
HIGH
KEN-13/WS/56059/8878
Safe drinking water, good sanitation and improved
hygiene services and education support for drought
affected persons in Balambala and Garissa districts in
Garissa County
MURDO
365,596
HIGH
KEN-13/WS/56349/122
Humanitarian intervention for water, sanitation, hygiene
and water quality surveillance during disasters and
WHO
resilience building for communities in at least 10 counties,
targeting women in Kenya
1,123,500
HIGH
KEN-13/WS/56359/6116
Improved water, sanitation and hygiene in Ikutha district,
Kitui
309,693
HIGH
Samaritan's
Purse
Sub total for WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE
29,268,216
Grand Total
743,545,979
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by appealing organizations.
Table V:
Requirements per gender marker score
Kenya Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan 2013
as of 15 November 2012
Requirements
($)
Gender marker
2b-The principal purpose of the project is to advance gender equality
8,786,500
2a-The project is designed to contribute significantly to gender equality
376,610,637
1-The project is designed to contribute in some limited way to gender equality
344,736,799
0-No signs that gender issues were considered in project design
7,971,483
Not Specified
5,440,560
Grand Total
743,545,979
121
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
ANNEX III: NEEDS
ASSESSMENT REFERENCE
LIST
EVIDENCE BASE FOR THE 2012 CAP: EXISTING NEEDS ASSESSMENTS
Sector
Geographic areas and
Lead agency and
Date
population groups
partners
targeted
Agriculture and
Livestock
Title or Subject
Medium and High rainfall
areas
GoK (MoA), FAO
Oct 2011
Medium and High
rainfall food security
assessment
Agriculture and
Livestock
ASALs
GoK (NDMA), FAO,
WFP
Feb 2012
Short
Assessment
Agriculture and
Livestock
ASALs
GoK (NDMA), FAO,
WFP
June 2012
Mid-season
food
security assessment
Agriculture and
Livestock
ASALs
GoK (NDMA), FAO,
WFP
Aug 2012
Long
Assessment
UNHCR and WFP
Oct 2012
Annual
Needs
Assessment-Joint
Assessment Mission
Kakuma, Dadaab refugee
camps
UNHCR
Sept, Nov,
2012
Nutrition
survey/Nutrition
Needs Assessment
Wajir South
SCUK
Jan-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Tana River
IMC
Feb-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Makueni
ACF
Mar-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Mandera West
SCUK
May-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Mandera Central
IRK
Mar-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
West Pokot
ACF
May-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Garbatulla surveillance
ACF
May-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Mwingi
CESVI
Mar-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Multi-sector
Refugees
Multi-sector
Refugees
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Kakuma, Dadaab refugee
camps
122
Rains
Rains
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Sector
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Geographic areas and
population groups
targeted
Lead agency and
partners
Date
Title or Subject
Meru North
IMC
Apr-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Isiolo
IMC
May-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Mandera North and East
IRK
Jul-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Wajir West and North
IRK
Jul-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Turkana Central
WVI
Jul-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Turkana South
Merlin
Jul-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Turkana North
IRC
Jul-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Turkana West
Merlin
Jul-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Moyale
Concern WW
Jul-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Marsabit
FHI
Jun-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Kajiado
ConcernWW
Aug-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Kitui
Mercy USA
Sep-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Kwale
Mercy USA
Sep-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
Laikipia
IMC
Aug-12
SMART
Survey
Nutrition
CURRENT GAPS IN INFORMATION
Sector
Geographic areas and population
groups
Agriculture and Livestock
ASALs
PLANNED NEEDS ASSESSMENTS
Sector/sector
Geographic areas and
population groups
targeted
Subject
Change in pastoral dynamics
Lead agency and
partners
Planned date
Subject
Agriculture and
Livestock
Medium and High rainfall
areas
GoK (MoA), FAO
Oct 2012
Medium and High
rainfall food
security
assessments
Agriculture and
ASALs
GoK (MoA), FAO,
Feb 2013
Short Rains
123
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Sector/sector
Geographic areas and
population groups
targeted
Livestock
Lead agency and
partners
Planned date
WFP
Subject
assessment
Agriculture and
Livestock
ASALs
GoK (MoA), FAO,
WFP
June 2013
Mid-season food
security
assessment
Agriculture and
Livestock
ASALs
GoK(NDMA), FAO,
WFP
Aug 2013
Long Rains
assessment
Nutrition
SAMBURU NORTH AND
EAST
IMC
DEC 2012
SMART Nutrition
Survey
Nutrition
SAMBURU CENTRAL
WVI
DEC 2012
SMART Nutrition
Survey
Nutrition
MANDERA
WEST/CENTRAL
SCUK
DEC 2012
SMART Nutrition
Survey
Nutrition
MANDERA EAST/NORTH
IRK
DEC 2012
SMART Nutrition
Survey
Nutrition
WAJIR EAST
SCUK
DEC 2012
SMART Nutrition
Survey
Nutrition
WAJIR SOUTH
IRK
DEC 2012
SMART Nutrition
Survey
Nutrition
MARSABIT
FHI
DEC 2012
SMART Nutrition
Survey
Nutrition
BARINGO
WVI
DEC 2012
SMART Nutrition
Survey
Nutrition
Tana River
IMC
Jan2013
SMART Nutrition
Survey
Coverage survey
Nutrition
Nutrition
Samburu
Isiolo
IMC
IMC
March 2013
KAP survey
August 2013
coverage survey
May2013
SMART Nutrition
Survey
Sept 2013
Nutrition
West Pokot
ACF
May 2013
June 2013
Nutrition
Laikipia
IMC
WASH
24 priority counties
UNICEF/MoWI/MoPHS
124
Coverage survey
SMART Nutrition
Survey
Coverage Surveys
SMART Nutrition
Survey
Jan 2013
WASH/KAP Survey
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
ANNEX IV: DONOR
RESPONSE TO THE 2012
APPEAL
Table VI: Requirements and funding per sector
2012+ Kenya Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan
as of 15 November 2012
Sector
AGRICULTURE AND
LIVESTOCK
COORDINATION
EARLY RECOVERY
EDUCATION
FOOD AID
HEALTH
MULTI-SECTOR
ASSISTANCE TO
REFUGEES
NUTRITION
PROTECTION
WATER,
SANITATION AND
HYGIENE
CLUSTER NOT YET
SPECIFIED
Grand Total
Original
requirements
Revised
requirements
Carryover
Funding
Total
resources
available
Unmet
requirements
%
Covered
Uncommitted
pledges
($)
($)
($)
($)
($)
($)
(%)
($)
A
B
C
D
E=C+D
F=B-E
G=E/B
H
44,779,394
35,477,768
-
8,723,826
8,723,826
26,753,942
25%
-
2,714,522
3,925,199
-
3,430,796
3,430,796
494,403
87%
-
28,278,823
23,580,953
-
2,818,142
2,818,142
20,762,811
12%
-
5,913,211
5,045,934
-
2,459,169
2,459,169
2,586,765
49%
-
192,191,038
243,088,222
98,216,049
131,822,864
230,038,913
13,049,309
95%
7,551,299
15,122,150
9,071,512
-
5,847,041
5,847,041
3,224,471
64%
-
404,283,560
406,889,412
32,506,350
253,026,712
285,533,062
121,356,350
70%
8,944,976
32,213,792
33,633,425
-
16,794,671
16,794,671
16,838,754
50%
-
9,627,869
9,868,047
-
1,746,367
1,746,367
8,121,680
18%
-
28,633,499
26,227,168
-
2,706,316
2,706,316
23,520,852
10%
-
-
-
1,596,312
16,699,917
18,296,229
n/a
n/a
-
796,807,640 132,318,711
446,075,821
578,394,532
218,413,108
763,757,858
73%
16,496,275
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations.
Funding:
contributions + commitments
Pledge:
a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these tables
indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed.)
Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be contributed.
Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity.
The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November 2012. For continuously
updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org).
125
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Table VII:
Requirements and funding per priority level
2012+ Kenya Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan
as of 15 November 2012
Priority
Original
requirements
Revised
requirements
Funding
Unmet
requirements
%
Covered
Uncommitted
pledges
($)
($)
($)
($)
(%)
($)
D=B-C
E=C/B
A
HIGH
MEDIUM
C
744,148,335
54,754,306
763,757,858
NOT SPECIFIED
Grand Total
B
709,003,552
F
556,225,814
187,922,521
75%
16,496,275
52,659,305
3,872,489
48,786,816
7%
-
-
18,296,229
n/a
n/a
796,807,640
578,394,532
218,413,108
73%
16,496,275
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations.
Funding:
contributions + commitments
Pledge:
a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these tables
indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed.)
Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be contributed.
Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity.
The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November 2012. For continuously
updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org).
Table VIII: Requirements and funding per organisation
2012+ Kenya Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan
as of 15 November 2012
Appealing
organization
ACF
Original
requirement
Revised
requirement
Carryover
Funding
Total
resources
available
Unmet
requirements
%
Covered
Uncommitted
pledges
($)
($)
($)
($)
($)
($)
(%)
($)
A
B
C
D
E=C+D
F=B-E
G=E/B
H
4,069,000
2,899,000
-
-
-
2,899,000
0%
-
10,982,263
10,982,263
-
-
-
10,982,263
0%
-
ActionAid
628,000
628,000
-
-
-
628,000
0%
-
ADEO
986,000
986,000
-
-
-
986,000
0%
-
ADRA
1,116,851
1,001,607
-
-
-
1,001,607
0%
-
196,150
196,150
-
-
-
196,150
0%
-
-
172,300
-
-
-
172,300
0%
-
ACTED
AEI
CEFA
CESVI
-
1,370,274
-
-
-
1,370,274
0%
-
1,882,100
1,235,100
-
-
-
1,235,100
0%
-
CHRiG
-
472,000
-
-
-
472,000
0%
-
COOPI
5,287,391
4,887,211
-
-
-
4,887,211
0%
-
Chr. Aid
126
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Appealing
organization
COSV
Original
requirement
Revised
requirement
Carryover
Funding
Total
resources
available
Unmet
requirements
%
Covered
Uncommitted
pledges
($)
($)
($)
($)
($)
($)
(%)
($)
A
B
C
D
E=C+D
F=B-E
G=E/B
H
-
385,000
-
-
-
385,000
0%
-
CPI
-
251,532
-
-
-
251,532
0%
-
CW
4,189,774
2,919,159
-
2,124,834
2,124,834
794,325
73%
-
DRC
3,479,031
1,458,494
-
674,020
674,020
784,474
46%
-
DWHH
1,213,000
809,000
-
-
-
809,000
0%
-
ECDHO
2,341,436
677,491
-
-
-
677,491
0%
-
-
-
1,596,312
1,385,779
2,982,091
n/a
n/a
-
20,380,000
14,411,000
-
7,619,424
7,619,424
6,791,576
53%
-
1,750,000
1,125,000
-
-
-
1,125,000
0%
-
160,394
108,642
-
-
-
108,642
0%
-
ERF (OCHA)
FAO
FH
GCN
GOAL
3,602,486
3,688,213
-
335,121
335,121
3,353,092
9%
-
HelpAge
International
796,048
796,048
-
-
-
796,048
0%
-
HHRD
999,987
799,990
-
-
-
799,990
0%
-
Hijra
579,990
579,990
-
-
-
579,990
0%
-
ILO
12,840,000
5,885,000
-
-
-
5,885,000
0%
-
IMC
3,161,729
3,161,729
-
695,749
695,749
2,465,980
22%
-
600,000
400,000
-
-
-
400,000
0%
-
IOM
10,971,140
18,810,594
-
3,000,000
3,000,000
15,810,594
16%
-
IRC
208,358
208,358
-
208,358
208,358
-
100%
-
IRW
878,790
878,790
-
878,790
878,790
-
100%
-
-
120,200
-
-
-
120,200
0%
-
Intervita
KNCHR
LVIA
777,320
467,548
-
-
-
467,548
0%
-
MERCY - USA
3,465,406
5,408,743
-
1,206,718
1,206,718
4,202,025
22%
-
MERLIN
1,726,097
1,726,097
-
701,972
701,972
1,024,125
41%
-
MURDO
491,625
230,000
-
-
-
230,000
0%
-
1,235,000
1,131,940
-
148,000
148,000
983,940
13%
-
NCCK
-
147,841
-
147,841
147,841
-
100%
-
NORKENYA
-
378,045
-
-
-
378,045
0%
-
NRC
-
375,000
-
-
-
375,000
0%
-
2,573,217
3,783,894
-
3,300,796
3,300,796
483,098
87%
-
NA
OCHA
PIDAD
-
148,000
-
148,000
148,000
-
100%
-
PISP
1,582,203
1,797,203
-
-
-
1,797,203
0%
-
Plan
266,617
139,465
-
-
-
139,465
0%
-
-
367,569
-
-
-
367,569
0%
-
141,305
141,305
-
130,000
130,000
11,305
92%
-
PU-AMI
RedR UK
RET
616,566
616,566
-
-
-
616,566
0%
-
RI
1,996,205
1,658,736
-
-
-
1,658,736
0%
-
SC
3,922,747
3,114,943
-
2,078,315
2,078,315
1,036,628
67%
-
Solidarités
4,130,000
2,806,878
-
-
-
2,806,878
0%
-
Southern Aid
Terre des Hommes
TSN
-
972,000
-
-
-
972,000
0%
-
2,316,222
3,210,000
-
-
-
3,210,000
0%
-
-
148,000
-
148,000
148,000
-
100%
-
127
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Appealing
organization
Original
requirement
Revised
requirement
Carryover
Funding
Total
resources
available
Unmet
requirements
%
Covered
Uncommitted
pledges
($)
($)
($)
($)
($)
($)
(%)
($)
A
B
C
D
E=C+D
F=B-E
G=E/B
H
UN Women
2,952,965
3,126,456
-
UNDP
2,990,950
2,990,950
-
-
3,760,000
-
UNFPA
2,430,000
1,620,000
-
UNHCR
236,078,892
236,281,824
UNICEF
47,123,107
42,300,342
-
UNISDR
3,500,000
3,500,000
-
VEA
400,000
400,000
VSF (Germany)
750,000
VSF (Switzerland)
1,220,000
WCA
WCDO
UNESCO
0%
-
2,990,950
0%
-
3,243,334
14%
-
-
1,620,000
0%
-
136,754,601
99,527,223
58%
-
40,457,986
40,457,986
1,842,356
96%
-
-
-
3,500,000
0%
-
-
-
-
400,000
0%
-
750,000
-
-
-
750,000
0%
-
1,220,000
-
-
-
1,220,000
0%
-
3,279,000
440,000
-
-
-
440,000
0%
-
2,323,918
1,329,269
-
148,000
148,000
1,181,269
11%
-
382,039,663 130,722,399
242,041,434
372,763,833
9,275,830
98%
16,496,275
1,062,417
1,062,417
1,430,683
43%
-
WFP
334,158,806
WHO
6,238,100
15,000
3,111,456
-
-
516,666
516,666
-
- 136,754,601
2,493,100
-
15,000
WRFDP
860,000
860,000
-
-
-
860,000
0%
-
WVK
911,672
2,622,128
-
148,000
148,000
2,474,128
6%
-
796,807,640 132,318,711
446,075,821
578,394,532
218,413,108
73%
16,496,275
Grand Total:
763,757,858
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations.
Funding:
contributions + commitments
Pledge:
a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these tables
indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed.)
Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be contributed.
Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity.
The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November 2012. For continuously
updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org).
128
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Table IX:
Appeal
Total funding per donor to projects listed in the
2012+ Kenya Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan
as of 15 November 2012
Donor
Funding
United States
182,840,226
32%
350,000
Carry-over (donors not specified)
132,318,711
23%
-
United Kingdom
62,482,151
11%
8,594,976
Japan
40,316,162
7%
-
European Commission
33,756,763
6%
7,551,299
Germany
27,684,170
5%
-
Canada
23,227,426
4%
-
Allocation of unearmarked funds by UN agencies
16,572,615
3%
-
World Bank
10,588,730
2%
-
Netherlands
5,269,681
1%
-
Switzerland
5,201,435
1%
-
Brazil
5,066,977
1%
-
Sweden
4,296,583
1%
-
Private (individuals & organisations)
4,234,163
1%
-
Finland
3,341,237
1%
-
Kenya
2,558,962
0%
-
Russian Federation
2,542,110
0%
-
France
2,249,148
0%
-
Belgium
2,128,752
0%
-
Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF)
2,000,830
0%
-
Denmark
2,000,131
0%
-
Allocation of unearmarked funds by IGOs
1,999,965
0%
-
Asian Development Bank
1,000,000
0%
-
Ireland
871,602
0%
-
Norway
858,239
0%
-
Spain
747,494
0%
-
Saudi Arabia
671,008
0%
-
Austria
449,952
0%
-
Korea, Republic of
400,000
0%
-
OPEC Fund
200,000
0%
-
($)
129
% of
Grand Total
(%)
Uncommitted
pledges
($)
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Donor
Funding
% of
Grand Total
Uncommitted
pledges
($)
(%)
($)
Italy
172,185
0%
-
Greece
126,671
0%
-
Israel
90,394
0%
-
Zambia
80,059
0%
-
Hungary
50,000
0%
-
Grand Total
578,394,532
100%
16,496,275
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations.
Funding:
contributions + commitments
Pledge:
a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on
these tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed.)
Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be
contributed.
Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity.
The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November 2012. For
continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking
Service (fts.unocha.org).
130
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Table X:
Non-Appeal funding per IASC standard sector
Other Humanitarian Funding to Kenya 2012
as of 15 November 2012
Sector
AGRICULTURE
Funding
% of
Grand Total
Uncommitted
pledges
($)
(%)
($)
817,379
1%
-
4,418,093
5%
-
552,795
1%
-
4,937,415
5%
-
21,449,348
23%
-
PROTECTION/HUMAN RIGHTS/RULE OF LAW
1,232,659
1%
-
SAFETY AND SECURITY OF STAFF AND OPERATIONS
1,645,963
2%
-
825,083
1%
-
WATER AND SANITATION
21,110,849
22%
-
SECTOR NOT YET SPECIFIED
37,268,801
40%
-
Grand Total
94,258,385
100%
-
COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES
ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE
FOOD
HEALTH
SHELTER AND NON-FOOD ITEMS
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations.
Funding:
contributions + commitments
Pledge:
a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on
these tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed.)
Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be
contributed.
Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity.
The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November 2012. For
continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking
Service (fts.unocha.org).
131
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Table XI:
other)
Total humanitarian funding per donor (Appeal plus
Kenya 2012
as of 15 November 2012
Donor
Funding
($)
% of
Grand Total
(%)
Uncommitted
pledges
($)
United States
216,983,657
32%
350,000
Carry-over (donors not specified)
132,318,711
20%
-
United Kingdom
75,083,120
11%
8,594,976
European Commission
61,924,131
9%
7,551,299
Japan
41,016,162
6%
-
Germany
32,064,420
5%
-
Canada
23,227,426
3%
-
Allocation of unearmarked funds by UN agencies
17,568,785
3%
-
World Bank
10,588,730
2%
-
Switzerland
9,642,680
1%
-
Sweden
5,935,963
1%
-
Netherlands
5,269,681
1%
-
Brazil
5,066,977
1%
-
Finland
4,759,300
1%
-
Denmark
4,289,355
1%
-
Private (individuals & organisations)
4,234,163
1%
-
Allocation of unearmarked funds by IGOs
2,999,965
0%
-
Kenya
2,558,962
0%
-
Russian Federation
2,542,110
0%
-
Norway
2,509,905
0%
-
France
2,249,148
0%
-
Belgium
2,128,752
0%
-
Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF)
2,000,830
0%
-
Ireland
1,702,221
0%
-
Asian Development Bank
1,000,000
0%
-
Spain
747,494
0%
-
Saudi Arabia
671,008
0%
-
Austria
449,952
0%
-
Korea, Republic of
400,000
0%
-
OPEC Fund
200,000
0%
-
132
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
Donor
Funding
% of
Grand Total
Uncommitted
pledges
($)
(%)
($)
Italy
172,185
0%
-
Greece
126,671
0%
-
Israel
90,394
0%
-
Zambia
80,059
0%
-
Hungary
50,000
0%
-
Grand Total
672,652,917
100%
16,496,275
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations.
Funding:
contributions + commitments
Pledge:
a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on
these tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed.)
Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be
contributed.
Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity.
* Includes contributions to the Consolidated Appeal and additional contributions outside of the Consolidated Appeal Process
(bilateral, Red Cross, etc.)
The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 15 November 2012. For
continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking
Service (fts.unocha.org).
133
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
ANNEX V: ACRONYMS AND
ABBREVIATIONS
ACAPS
ACF
ACTED
ADEO
ADRA
AIDS
ALDEF
ALP
AMINA
AMISOM
ARV
ASAL(s)
AU
AVSI
AWD
Assessment Capacities Project
Action Contre la Faim (Action Against Hunger)
Agency for Technical Cooperation and Development
African Development & Emergency Organisation
Adventist Development and Relief Agency
acquired immuno-deficiency syndrome
Arid Lands Development Focus
alternative learning programme
Aktiv für Menschen in Not Austria (Active for people in need)
African Mission in Somalia
anti-retroviral
Arid and Semi-arid Land(s)
African Union
Association of Volunteers in International Service
acute watery diarrhea
BID
BSFP
best interest determination
blanket supplementary feeding programme
CA
CAFOD
CAP
CARE
CBM
CCCM
CCPP
CERF
CESVI
CFA
CFW
CHS
CHW
COCOP
COOPI
CP
CPI
CRS
conservation agriculture
Catholic Agency For Overseas Development
consolidated appeal or consolidated appeal process
Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere
Christian Blind Mission
camp coordination and camp management
contagious caprine pleuropneumonia
Central Emergency Response Fund
Cooperazione e Sviluppo (Cooperation and Development)
cash-for-assets
cash-for-work
community and household surveillance
community health worker
consortium of cooperating partners
Cooperazione Internazionale (International Cooperation)
contingency plan
Children Peace Initiative – Kenya
Catholic Relief Service
DDC
DDMC
DEO
DFID
DHIS
DHMTs
DRA
DRC
DRM
DRR
District Disaster Committees
District Disaster Management Committees
district education office
Department for International Development
District Health Information System
District Health Management Teams
Department of Refugee Affairs
Danish Refugee Council
disaster risk management
disaster risk reduction
134
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
DSG
DWHH
District Steering Groups
Deutsche Welthungerhilfe (German Agro Action)
ECHO
EHRP
EMIS
EPRP
EU
EWARN
European Commission Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection
Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan
Environmental Management Information System
Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan
European Union
Early Warning and Response Network
FaIDA
FAO
FBO
F/CFA
FCS
FEWSNET
FFA
FFW
FH
FHI
FNSP
FTS
Fafi Integrated Development Association
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
faith-based organization
food/cash-for-assets
food consumption score
Famine Early Warning Systems Network
food-for-assets
food-for-work
Food for the Hungry
Family Health International
Food and Nutrition Security Policy
Financial Tracking Service
GAA
GAM
GBV
GBVIMS
GEZA
GFD
GHO
GIZ
German Agro Action
global acute malnutrition
gender-based violence
GBV Information Management System
Gemeinnützige Entwicklungszusammenarbeit GmbH (Helping people to help themselves)
general food distribution
Global Health Observatory
Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit
(German Agency for International Cooperation
Government of Kenya
Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit
(German Agency for Technical Cooperation)
GoK
GTZ
HC
HDR
HFA
HHRD
HINI
HIV
HKI
HMIS
HSNP
Humanitarian Coordinator
Human Development Report
Hyogo Framework of Action
Helping Hand for Relief and Development
high-impact nutrition interventions
human immuno-deficiency virus
Helen Keller International
Health Management Information System
Hunger Safety Net Programme
ICC
ICPACC
IDP
IEC
IFPRI
IGAD
IM
IMAM
IMC
INGO
International Criminal Court
IGAD Climate Prediction and Applications Centre
internally displaced person
information, education and communication
International Food Policy Research Institute
Intergovernmental Authority on Development
information management
integrated management of acute malnutrition
International Medical Corps
international non-governmental organization
135
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
INSO
IOM
IPC
IR
IRC
IRW
ISWG
International NGO Safety Organization
International Organization for Migration
Integrated Food Security and Humanitarian Phase Classification
Islamic Relief
International Rescue Committee
Islamic Relief Worldwide
inter-sector working group
JICA
JMP
JRS
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Joint Monitoring Programme
Jesuit Refugee Service
KDHS
KFSSG
KHPT
KIE
KIRA
KNBS
KNCHR
KRCS
Ksh
Kenya Demographic and Health Survey
Kenya Food Security Steering Group
Kenya Humanitarian Partners Team
Kenya Institute of Education
Kenya Initial Rapid Assessment
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics
Kenya National Commission on Human Rights
Kenya Red Cross Society
Kenyan shilling
LEGS
LVIA
LWF
Livestock Emergency Guidelines
Lay Volunteers International Association
Lutheran World Federation
M&E
MDG
MDR-TB
MERLIN
MMR
MoA
MoE
MoH
MoLD
MoMS
MoPHS
MORSS
MOSS
MoSSP
MoWI
MR
MSF
MT
MTP
MURDO
MoWI
MYC
MYR
monitoring & evaluation
Millennium Development Goal
multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis
Medical Emergency Relief International
maternal mortality rate
Ministry of Agriculture
Ministry of Education
Ministry of Health
Ministry of Livestock Development
Ministry of Medical Services
Ministry of Public Health & Sanitation
Minimum Operating Residential Security Standards
Minimum Operating Security Standard
Ministry of State for Special Programmes
Ministry of Water & Irrigation
mortality rate
Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders)
metric ton
mid-term plan
Mubarak for Relief and Development Organization
Ministry of Water and Irrigation
Muslim Youth Centre
mid-year review
NA
NALEAP
NCCK
NCIC
NDMA
NDOC
Northern Aid
National Legal Aid and Awareness Programme
National Council of Churches Kenya
National Commission on Integration and Cohesion
National Drought Management Authority
National Disaster Operation Centre
136
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
NEP
NFI
NGO
NRC
North Eastern Province
non-food item
non-governmental organization
Norwegian Refugee Council
OCHA
OPS
OVC
Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
On-line Planning/Projects System
orphans and vulnerable children
PDNA
PEP
PEV
PHMT
PISP
PLW
PoC
PPR
PRRO
PSC
PSEA
PU
PWD
PWG
PWGID
Post-Disaster Needs Assessment
post-exposure prophylaxis
post-election violence
provincial health management team
Pastoralist Integrated Support Programme
pregnant and lactating women
people of concern
peste des petits ruminants
protracted relief and recovery operation
Parliamentary Select Committee
protection from sexual exploitation and abuse
Première Urgence
people with disabilities
Protection Working Group
Protection Working Group on Internal Displacement
RC
RCK
RCO
RI
RVF
Resident Coordinator
Refugee Consortium of Kenya
Resident Coordinator’s Office
Relief International
Rift Valley fever
SAM
SC
SGBV
SLT
SMART
SMC
SMP
SOP
SR on HR
SRA
severe acute malnutrition
Save the Children
sexual or gender-based violence
Saving Lives Together
Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transition
Student Mobilization Center
School Meal Programme
standard operating procedure
Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of IDPs
Short Rains Assessment
TB
TdH
ToR
ToT
TRJC
TSC
tuberculosis
Terre des Hommes
terms of reference
training of trainers
Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission
Teachers Service Commission
UASC
UN
UNDAF
UNDP
UNDSS
UNEP
UNESCO
unaccompanied asylum-seeking children
United Nations
United Nations Development Assistance Framework
United Nations Development Programme
United Nations Department of Security and Safety
United Nations Environment Programme
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization
137
KENYA EMERGENCY HUMANTARIAN RESPONSE PLAN 2013
UNFPA
UNHCR
UNICEF
United Nations Population Fund
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
United Nations Children’s Fund
VSF
Vétérinaires sans Frontières
WASH
WCA
WCDO
WESCOORD
WFP
WHO
WVI
WVK
water, sanitation and hygiene
World Cares Association
World Concern and Development Organization
Water and Environmental Sanitation Coordination Committee
World Food Programme
World Health Organization
World Vision International
World Vision-Kenya
138
OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS
(OCHA)
United Nations
New York, N.Y. 10017
USA
Palais des Nations
1211 Geneva 10
Switzerland