School Improvement Plan: Clarington Central Secondary School Literacy: NEEDS ASSESSMENT What is our data telling us about students’ area of need? Which students have we selected to focus on? OSSLT: The data indicates that our essential and applied level learners are falling significantly behind in terms of achieving provincial standards on the literacy test. As such, our focus should be on helping these learners achieve the next grade level in order to improve overall OSSLT scores. Primary: 2006/2007 Junior: 2009/2010 Reading: 63% (191 students) Dr. Ross Tilley – 48% (79) Enniskillen – 76% (33) Hampton Jr – 78% (36) MJ Hobbs – NONE Waverly – 67% (43) Reading: 72% (185 students) Dr. Ross Tilley – 65% (72) Enniskillen – 87% (31) Hampton Jr – NONE MJ Hobbs – 74% (39) Waverly – 72% (43) Writing: 67% (191 students) Dr. Ross Tilley – 52% (79) Enniskillen – 76% (33) Hampton Jr – 78% (36) MJ Hobbs – NONE Waverly – 79% (43) Writing: 64% (185 students) Dr. Ross Tilley – 54% (72) Enniskillen – 81% (31) Hampton Jr – NONE MJ Hobbs – 74% (39) Waverly – 58% (43) SMART GOAL What do we expect students to achieve at the conclusion of this time frame? Meeting Provincial Standards (2013/2014) 9L – 46% 10L – 64% 9P – 51% 10P – 63% 9D – 71% 10D – 68% OSSLT (2013/2014) 73% Overall success 29% IEP success 70% scored at provincial average in reading 63% scored at provincial average in writing Notes: While our curriculum areas are streamed (Academic, Applied, Essential) the literacy test is not 50% of applied level students have an IEP 27% of students writing OSSLT required accommodations In the past five years, the number of students with IEPs has increased from 17% to 25% of the student population 100 students with IEPs have SEA technology assigned to them The English curriculum does overlap with the OSSLT, but many of the skills required for success on this test are also relevant in other curriculum areas (see OSSLT Curriculum Connections, June 2011) If teachers intentionally embed implicit and explicit multiple choice questions into their curriculum areas and model strategies to answer these questions, then students can build criteria for answering these questions, improving OSSLT scores. If teachers continue their work with implicit questioning then students will be able to construct a well written paragraph response to an implicit question based on an informational piece, a graphic text or a fictitious text. School Improvement Plan: Clarington Central Secondary School SMART GOAL: If teachers intentionally embed implicit and explicit multiple choice questions into their curriculum areas and model strategies to answer these questions, then students can build criteria for answering these questions, improving OSSLT scores. If teachers continue their work with implicit questioning then students will be able to construct a well written paragraph response to an implicit question based on an informational piece, a graphic text or a fictitious text. STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS EVALUATION CYCLE What are the targeted, evidence-based instructional strategies we will use to achieve our SMART goal? When and how often will we collect evidence to measure progress made on the achievement of our SMART goal? All grade 9 teachers: Literacy TLCP with a focus on reading strategies and implicit and explicit multiple choice strategies in semester 1. TLCP cycles will last one semester Teachers will perform a pre-assessment to determine student needs. They will then intentionally adjust their lesson o Early October: Pre-test planning accordingly in an attempt to move students forward one level by the time of the post-assessment. o Late October: Discuss results Open response paragraphs were marked along with descriptive feedback relating to the criteria for these answers o November: Implement strategies based and given to students to create their individual next steps. on pre-assessment results o Early December: Post-test All grade 10 teachers: o Mid-December: Discuss post-test Literacy TLCP focus on open response questions; specifically paragraphs leading to a series of paragraphs results Second TLCP cycle will be held during semester Some grade 10 teachers: 2 (dates TBD) Will focus on a weekly skill (depending on period); summarizing, short writing, graphic text, news report First week of semester 2 for targeted withdrawal Some grade 9/10 teachers: OSSLT results will be available annually Exams will be formatted to mimic the literacy test. RESOURCES Will take part in the SSSSI project focusing on strategies to help applied learners succeed What resources will we use to achieve our SMART goal? Will continue to focus on multiple choice questions (grade 9 applied geography) Few teachers: Weekly after school help sessions will be held to focus on OSSLT skills leading up to the test. These sessions will be for any student, but students identified as needing extra help will be specifically invited. Targeted withdrawal from class for IEP students to complete practice literacy test and build specific skills as indicated by test results Class profiles will be built for grade 9 classes. These profiles will be used to inform decisions on who is invited to our after school program as well as to identify areas of need within these classroom. Grade 8 assessment data to be used in grade 9 course profiles. Pre and post-assessment data will drive the TLCP. Literacy consultant to be used when necessary. Examples of previous OSSL tests to be used in formatting exams. Workbooks for after school program. School Improvement Plan: Clarington Central Secondary School PROFESSIONAL LEARNING What knowledge and skills are required for us to achieve our SMART goal? Teacher PD on writing effective multiple choice questions. Literacy lead will use transition meetings with grade 7, 8 and 9 teachers to determine candidates for after school program. OSSLT data review and analysis of IIRs. Monthly meetings of grade 10 TLCP teachers to develop criteria around effective multiple choice questions and effective open response paragraphs MONITORING What evidence will we use to show that students are making progress? When will we collect evidence? Pre and post-assessment data from the TLCP Post assessment data from TLCP IEP practice tests Unsuccessful test scores (grade 11s) OSSLT results NOTES What else do we need to know? TLCP structure allows teachers to work collaboratively to intentionally implement instructional strategies to drive student learning TLCP meeting dates and times will be as flexible as possible Norms for TLCP meetings include: Being on time Being respectful of those who are speaking Being engaged in the learning School Improvement Plan: Clarington Central Secondary School Numeracy: NEEDS ASSESSMENT What is our data telling us about students’ area of need? Which students have we selected to focus on? SMART GOAL What do we expect students to achieve at the conclusion of this time frame? Grade 9 EQAO: Significant improvement in grade 9 applied EQAO scores indicate that work with the FIPP style lesson structure is beneficial and therefore should be incorporated into more math classes. The current focus is continuing the work done in grade 9 applied and extending it to grade 10 applied. It is clear that the number of students meeting provincial standards declines at the applied level from grade 9 to grade 10, so implementing FIPP into 2P could help engage and move forward these learners. Primary: 2007/2008 Overall: 59% (170 students) Junior: 2010/2011 Overall: 52% (165 students) Dr. Ross Tilley – 49% (71) Enniskillen – 43% (28) Hampton Jr – 92% (25) MJ Hobbs – NONE Waverly – 65% (46) Dr. Ross Tilley – 49% (75) Enniskillen – 50% (24) Hampton Jr – NONE MJ Hobbs – 43% (23) Waverly – 58% (43) At Provincial Standards (2013/2014) 9P – 41% 10P – 34% 9D – 53% 10D – 54% EQAO (2013/2014) Applied – 59% Academic – 70% Notes: 50% of applied level students have an IEP In the past five years, the number of students with IEPs has increased from 17% to 25% of the student population 100 students with IEPs have SEA technology assigned to them FIPP teachers have noted an increase in student engagement and an overall increase in classroom learning when utilizing the FIPP style lessons Meeting provincial standards on EQAO and meeting them in a classroom appear to be very different, especially at the academic level If teachers adopt the FIPP style lesson structure in math, then student engagement in all grades and EQAO test scores in grade 9 will rise. School Improvement Plan: Clarington Central Secondary School SMART GOAL: If teachers adopt the FIPP style lesson structure in math, then student engagement in all grades and EQAO test scores in grade 9 will rise. STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS What are the targeted, evidence-based instructional strategies we will use to achieve our SMART goal? All math teachers: Will work collaboratively to develop resources for FIPP like grade 10 applied lessons Will create a group dynamic within their classrooms to allow students to learn collaboratively EVALUATION CYCLE When and how often will we collect evidence to measure progress made on the achievement of our SMART goal? All grade 9/10 applied math teachers: Teachers will work to implement the FIPP style lessons into grade 9 and ten applied All grade 9 applied math teachers: Will continue to extend the FIPP program within the 1P course Will work with the board consultant to assess strengths and weaknesses of the current program and look for areas of improvement All grade 10 applied math teachers: Will work with the grade 9 applied teachers and the Math Lead to implement the activities being developed into their courses. 9 and 10 applied teachers will collect anecdotal evidence on tasks that work/don’t work throughout the semester Weekly meetings between FIPP teachers and board consultant to discuss progress Math department meetings (once per month) will be used to discuss this evidence and adjust plans accordingly EQAO results will be available each semester RESOURCES What resources will we use to achieve our SMART goal? Planning time will be needed in order to create tasks for the 2P course Additional supply time may be required in order for experienced FIPP teachers to work with those who are new to the program either through collaborative discussions or team teaching Weekly meetings with board consultant TIPS materials EQAO resources School Improvement Plan: Clarington Central Secondary School PROFESSIONAL LEARNING What knowledge and skills are required for us to achieve our SMART goal? Teachers of 9P and 10P who are new to FIPP will require professional learning around what this program looks like in a classroom or will be timetabled to coteach with a more experienced FIPP teacher Collaborative approach to developing rich assessment tasks allows department members to mentor one another MONITORING What evidence will we use to show that students are making progress? When will we collect evidence? EQAO results will be analyzed annually Marker students will be chosen from class profiles to determine whether they can be improved by a grade level Math department feedback: o Teachers are finding that while the prep is more, the learning is the focus o Students are activating one another as learning resources o Should be implemented in all courses o Direct relationship between FIPP and LG/SC/DF NOTES What else do we need to know? EQAO scores rose dramatically upon introduction of FIPP to grade 9 applied in 2013/2014. Having a second teacher and significantly reduced student:teacher ratios is also likely a factor in improvements seen from FIPP Math teachers can share FIPP strategies with other curriculum areas as these strategies likely translate to other courses School Improvement Plan: Clarington Central Secondary School Goals, Criteria and Feedback NEEDS ASSESSMENT What is our data telling us about students’ area of need? Which students have we selected to focus on? SEF INDICATORS: Many staff members have incorporated learning goals and success criteria into their lesson planning. The focus is to move toward a place where descriptive feedback is driving assessment, and in turn, new learning. This is a focus for teachers and administrators at CCSS. SMART GOAL What do we expect students to achieve at the conclusion of this time frame? 1.3 - Students and educators build a common understanding of what students are learning by identifying, sharing and clarifying the learning goals and success criteria. 1.4 - During learning, timely, ongoing, descriptive feedback about student progress is provided, based on student actions and co-constructed success criteria. Notes: Formal learning walks took place twice in 2013/2014 indicated teachers are in the beginning stages of intentionally incorporating goals and criteria into lesson planning More time for peer and self-assessments needs to be intentionally implemented Informal learning walks are routinely performed by admin (5-10 classes per week) with feedback being descriptive in nature and not evaluative o Feedback based on questions to students: What are you doing? What are you learning? How will you know when you’re successful? If learning goals, success criteria and descriptive feedback are modeled and practiced by students, teachers and administrators, then a continuous flow of assessment information is created allowing next steps in learning to be intentionally informed. School Improvement Plan: Clarington Central Secondary School SMART GOAL: If learning goals, success criteria and descriptive feedback are modeled and practiced by students, teachers and administrators, then a continuous flow of assessment information is created allowing next steps in learning to be intentionally informed. STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS What are the targeted, evidence-based instructional strategies we will use to achieve our SMART goal? A few staff: Will take place in instructional rounds where they will observe and gather evidence on the effectiveness of LG/SC/DF as they visit partner classrooms. Will take place in the Student Success School Support Initiative (SSSSI) initiative for applied level learners Lead teachers: Will undergo introductory training as to how LG/SC/DF connect and integrate in an assessment for learning approach Will create their own learning goal around the focus of learning on how goals, criteria and feedback interact Will monitor their progression in achieving this goal by collecting evidence based on the School, Teacher and Classroom “look fors” in SEF document under indicators 1.3 and 1.4 Will begin to mentor members of their departments as they intentionally include LG/SC in their lesson planning Will inform their curriculum areas about the 1.3/1.4 look fors ahead of January 9 learning walks All staff: Will develop learning goals for each of their courses and co-construct success criteria with students and then use these criteria as a basis for descriptive feedback. Learning goals will be developed for each block of learning and will be shared with students regularly EVALUATION CYCLE When and how often will we collect evidence to measure progress made on the achievement of our SMART goal? Learning walks to continue throughout the year by administration for all staff Formal learning walk January 9 (1.3/1.4 look fors) IR teachers will receive evidence on their progression as host teachers in early December SSSSI post-assessment data to be reviewed in early December RESOURCES What resources will we use to achieve our SMART goal? Supply coverage Ministry support; Paul Walsh Board office support; Jennifer McIlmoyle-Parsons (IR) Board support; Vikki Dunn (SSSSI) School Improvement Plan: Clarington Central Secondary School PROFESSIONAL LEARNING What knowledge and skills are required for us to achieve our SMART goal? Instructional Rounds involves 3 days of central learning around LG/SC/DF and 4 days of classroom visits for observations Learning walks conducted by admin can lead to DF for teaching staff Formal learning walks lead to DF for administration SSSSI meetings Lead Teacher PD with Paul Walsh around LG/SC/DF (late November and again in April) November PD curriculum area meetings discussions linked to goals/criteria and feedback Notes What else do we need to know? MONITORING What evidence will we use to show that students are making progress? When will we collect evidence? Evidence will come in the form of anecdotal notes from teachers on instructional rounds as well as evidence collected during learning walks. Evidence must be descriptive in nature and must be connected to our focus on LG/SC/DF Evidence to be focused on 1.3 and 1.4 in SEF School Improvement Plan: Clarington Central Secondary School Student Well Being NEEDS ASSESSMENT What is our data telling us about students’ area of need? Which students have we selected to focus on? SEF INDICATORS: 2.5 - Staff, students, parents and school community promote and sustain student well-being and positive student behavior in a safe, accepting, inclusive and healthy learning environment. 3.1 - The teaching and learning environment is inclusive, promotes the intellectual engagement of all students and reflects individual student strengths, needs, learning preferences and cultural perspectives. Tell them from me: Relative Strengths 95% positive behaviour (87% federally) 22% truancy (34% federally) o No difference between males and females, however sharp increase from grade 9 to grade 12 (up to 37% in grade 12) 14% of students have been bullied in the previous month (20% federally) Surprises 63% of students feel a sense of belonging vs 70% federally 23% of students feel they have someone at school who consistently provides encouragement and can be turned to for advice. (26% federally) 22% of students told an adult they were being bullied. 18% told an adult a friend was being bullied Areas for Growth 30% (38% of females and 18% of males) report moderate to high levels of anxiety (18% federally) 28% report depression (19% federally) o 62% of girls and 78% of boys report high self esteem 40% feel school staff step in quickly when bullying occurs SMART GOAL What do we expect students to achieve at the conclusion of this time frame? Mental Health: If staff develop a common understanding and a common language around mental health, then students will feel more comfortable engaging in conversations around their mental health status and teachers will be better equipped to accommodate their needs, thereby reducing levels of anxiety around school. Equity and Diversity: If school offers a variety of activities, then more students will feel a sense of belonging in the school community. Community, Culture and Caring: If staff make intentional connections with students, then students will feel as though they have a caring adult in the building who can step in quickly when bullying occurs. School Improvement Plan: Clarington Central Secondary School Trends in comments Teachers are helpful and understanding School is welcoming and friendly School is overwhelming and stressful at times (it seems that large assessments come in waves) E-texts are not useful as some students don’t have Internet access Our staff pre-assessment (October staff meeting) indicated that: There is a need for common vocabulary surrounding mental health There is a need to increase staff and student awareness of mental health Our student voice survey at the end of 2013/2014 indicated that: There are reduced incidences of bullying A whole school approach (student voice) is necessary in creating a safe school As well, this survey suggested that: We could become more approachable by all students (not just IEPs) Notes: SWT to administer pre-test for staff in October Student responses from October survey are to be analyzed From October survey, goals have been developed School Improvement Plan: Clarington Central Secondary School SMART GOAL: Mental Health: If staff develop a common understanding and a common language around mental health, then students will feel more comfortable engaging in conversations around their mental health status and teachers will be better equipped to accommodate their needs, thereby reducing levels of anxiety around school. Equity and Diversity: If school offers a variety of activities, then more students will feel a sense of belonging in the school community. Community, Culture and Caring: If staff make intentional connections with students, then students will feel as though they have a caring adult in the building who can step in quickly when bullying occurs. STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS EVALUATION CYCLE What are the targeted, evidence-based instructional strategies we will use to When and how often will we collect evidence to measure progress made on achieve our SMART goal? the achievement of our SMART goal? A few staff: Will continue to work on Ministry directives on transitions Will continue to facilitate grade 9 camp and other inclusion activities Will continue to work on anti-bullying initiatives; Tami, Live Differrent Will implement new programs; A5 is Against the Law, Kids have Stress Too, The Fourth R, The Zones of Regulation, Model Me Kids, Rainbow Will Develop a comprehensive mental health survey to inform our next steps Will offer athletic intramurals Will organize inclusion activities; Breakfast Club, Pink Shirt Day, Mental Health School Climate survey to be done annually Student Voice Survey to be done annually School Improvement Plan: Clarington Central Secondary School Committee, Student Council, Arts, Athletics Some staff: Will engage their period 2 classes in Career Cruising’s Individual Pathways Planner Will offer their classroom (including the gym) to students at lunch All staff: Will increase their mental health literacy; Tracy Valencourt (April PD) Will greet students at the door and welcome them to class Will use the calendar in Outlook to coordinate major assessments between subject areas in the senior U courses Will act on the TTFM survey results posted online, in poster form and on our TV announcement PROFESSIONAL LEARNING What knowledge and skills are required for us to achieve our SMART goal? RESOURCES What resources will we use to achieve our SMART goal? Student Success Team School Well-Being Team Safe, Caring and Restorative Schools Committee Mental Health Coordinators Mental Health Steering Committee MONITORING What evidence will we use to show that students are making progress? When will we collect evidence? Further training for teachers in the whole school approach to creating a positive school climate Annual school climate surveys Mental health learning sessions including Mental Health First Aid Annual Tell Them From Me surveys “Managing Mental Health in Your School (for administrators) “Supporting Mental Health in Your School” (support staff) Teacher PD on Career Cruising (October Staff Meeting) Suicide ASIST training for guidance staff Notes What else do we need to know? The school well-being team is a new initiative and therefore goals and strategies will be adjusted as necessary SWT has analyzed 2014 TTFM survey results