46
Component 4 Template 4.1- GOAL 1 – ACTION PLAN DEVELOPMENT
Reading, Language Arts, and Writing
Template 4.1
Revised Goal: Grades 3-5 will increase percentage of students scoring Advanced/Proficient in Reading from their target goal of 22.1% to 32% on
the 2013 Spring TCAP Achievement Test.
How is this Goal linked to the system’s Five-Year Plan? The district/ school has adopted the Tennessee Comprehensive System Wide Planning Process as its five-year
long range plan.
1.









Action Step
(Template 4.2)
Monitor/Evaluate
Direct/Explicit
Instruction in
Reading/Language
Arts and
implementation of
Common Core
Standards to
increase Proficiency
Good First Teaching
90 Minute Literacy
Block
Differentiated
Instruction
Utilizing Thinking
Maps
Utilize the Scotts
Foresman Reading
Street Program
Incorporate
Marzano’s Strategies
for Learning
Embed Literacy &
Numeracy
Departmentalize 4th
and 5th Grades
Utilize student data to
Time Line
Template 4.3
Aug.’12-May’13
(on-going)
Person(s) Responsible
Veronica Parish, Principal
Projected Cost(s) &
Funding Sources
2012-2013 Title 1
Budget $1,000.00
Mary Rodgers, Instr. Fac.
Dr. Kendra Hargrove,
Regional Literacy Coach
Dr. Patton, Regional
Mathematics Coach
Facilitator Salary
$62,000.00
Evaluation Strategy




Title I Professional
Development Budget
$2,000.00
Teachers/Educational
Assistants/Interventionists
Parents


Walkthroughs
Obs./Evals (TEM)
PLC Agendas &
Minutes
Lesson Plans
reflecting Good
First Teaching,
Embedding
Literacy/Numeracy
, differentiated
instruction, rigor,
SPIs, CCSS and
Higher Order
thinking skills
Parent
Packets/Sign-In
Rosters
Parent Surveys
Performance
Results/Outcomes
Increased scores on
Summative 2013 RLA
(TCAP) Assessments
from 22.1% to 32%.
TEMs Ratings 3,4,5
Increase 40% Parental
Involvement
47






maintain current and
accurate information
on each student and
to determine
instructional
decisions.
Provide daily review
of previous taught
skills through DO
Nows/Bell Ringers
Implement daily
inclusion and pullouts
in the
SPED/Resource
Instructional
Schedule
Integrate Technology
Mock TCAP
Assessments
Provide on-going PD
on Present research
based strategies,
CCSS, Best Practices,
Analyzing and
utilizing data to drive
instruction .
Provide on-going
Parent Training to
continuously inform
parents of Literacy
Program &
Curr/CCSS/SPI’s and
TCAP Assessment
goals; and effective
strategies to utilize
w/assisting their child
at home.
48

Family Literacy Night
Action Steps
2.Conduct Weekly Data
Talk Sessions
Once per Nine Wks.
Librarian & Committee
Timeline
Person(s) Responsible
Projected Cost(s) &
Funding Sources
Evaluation Strategy
Veronica Parish, Principal
N/A

Aug.’12-May’13
(on-going)
Mary Rodgers, Instr. Fac.



Utilize data to
determine
instructional
decisions
Identify non-mastery
SPIs/CCSS
Discuss
implementation of
effective research
based teaching
strategies, higher
order thinking
skills/activities,
differentiating
instruction,
educational journals,
articles, books and
novels.
Teachers




PLC Agendas &
Minutes
Student Data
Evaluating the
Integrity of
Assessments
Lesson plans
reflecting research
based strategies,
Embedding
Literacy/Numeracy
,higher order
thinking
skills/activities and
novels
Checklist of
recorded mastery
& non-mastery
SPIs
Performance
Results/Outcomes
Increased scores on
Summative 2013 RLA
(TCAP) Assessments
from 22.1% to 32%.
Increase and maintain
students scoring
Proficient/Advance on
Weekly Assessment and
Discovery Ed.
49
2.


Provide, Implement
& Monitor timely
interventions
Implement the
following District
Initiatives:
AIMSweb, EPGY,
Stanford LAW,
Reading Plus,
Destination Reading,
Mimeo
Provide After-School
Enrichment
Aug.’12-May’13
(on-going)
Veronica Parish, Principal
District Budget
Progress Monitoring
Mary Rodgers, Instr. Fac.
Title I Budget
$2,500.00
Updated EdPlan
Earnestine Benton,
Counselor
Attendance
Student Data
Teachers
Checklist of mastery &
non-mastery SPIs
Interventionists
Mary Rodgers,
Coordinator
Oct.’12-Mar.’13
Tutorial Teachers
Action Steps
Timeline
Person(s) Responsible
3.
Aug. ’12 (KRI)
Kindergarten Teachers
District Budget
Veronica Parish, Principal
Title I Budget $350.00



Administer the
Kindergarten
Readiness Indicator
(KRI) Assessment
Utilize data to
identify students’
strengthens and
weaknesses.
Utilize data to
determine
instructional
decisions.
Conduct Parent
meetings to discuss
Kindergarten
Readiness Indicator
(KRI), Kindergarten
curriculum and
expectations.
Mary Rodgers,
Instructional facilitator
Aug.12-May’13
(on-going)
Extended Contract
$6,500.00
Projected Cost(s)
Funding Sources
85% of Tier III students
will show improvement
with these interventions.
Increased scores on
Summative 2013 RLA
(TCAP) Assessments
from 22.1% to 32%.
Increase and maintain
students scoring
Proficient/Advance on
Weekly Assessment and
Discovery Ed.
Evaluation Strategies
Performance
Results/Outcomes
Kindergarten Readiness
Indicator (KRI)
Assessment Data
90% Kindergarten students
will meet or exceed
standards
Parent Meeting
Agendas & Sign-In
Sheets
Increase Parental
Knowledge of student’s
readiness level and
Kindergarten expectations
50
4.



Integrate Common
Core Standards in
Project-Based Think
Show
Provide on-going PD
on Common Core
State Standards
Attend Curator PD
Provide Think Show
PD for parents,
community leaders
and adopters
Aug’12-May’13
Veronica Parish, Principal
Mary Rodgers,
Instructional facilitator
March’13
District Staff
Teachers
Community Leaders,
parents and adopters
Title I Budget
$2,000.00
Teachers/Jurors
Evaluation of student
Think Show Projects
Exemplary Ratings
51
Goal: Increase the percentage of students in grades 3-5 scoring Advanced/Proficient in Mathematics from their target of 24.2% to 34%.
How is this Goal linked to the system’s Five –Year Plan? The district/school has adopted the Tennessee Comprehensive System Wide Planning Process as its
five year long range plan.
Action Steps
Timeline
Person(s) Responsible
Projected Cost(s)
Evaluation Strategies
Performance
Funding Sources
Results/Outcome
Aug’12-May’13
Veronica Parish, Principal
2012-2013 Title I
Increased scores on
1. Monitor/Evaluate
 Walkthroughs
(on-going)
Budget $1,700.00
Summative 2013
Direct/Explicit
 Obs./Evals (TEM)
Mary Rodgers, Instr. Fac.
Mathematics(TCAP)
Instructions in
 PLC Agendas &
Facilitator Salary
Assessments
Mathematics and
Minutes
Dr. Patton, Regional
$62,000.00
from 24.2%-34%.
Implementation of
 Lesson Plans
Mathematics Coach
Common Core
reflecting Good
Title I Professional
Standards to increase
TEMs Ratings 3,4,5
First Teaching,
Dr. Kendra Hargrove,
Development Budget
Proficiency
rigor, differentiated
Regional Literacy Coach
$2,000.00
 Good First Teaching
Increase 40% Parental
instruction,
 75 Minute Mathematics
Involvement
Embedding
Teachers/Educational
Block
Literacy/Numeracy,
Assistants/Interventionists
 Calendar Math
SPIs, CCSS and
Parents
 Differentiated
Higher Order
Instruction
thinking skills
 Utilizing Thinking
 Parent
Maps
Packets/Sign-In
Rosters
 Utilize the Envision
Mathematics Program
 Parent Surveys
 Incorporate Marzano’s
Strategies for Learning
 Embed Literacy &
Numeracy
 Departmentalize 4th and
5th Grades
 Integrate Technology
 Mock TCAP
Assessments
 Utilize student data to
maintain current and
accurate information on
each student and to
52





determine instructional
decisions.
Provide daily review of
previous taught skills
through DO Nows/Bell
Ringers
Implement daily
inclusion and pullouts
in the SPED/Resource
Instructional Schedule
Provide on-going PD
on Present research
based strategies, CCSS,
Best Practices,
Analyzing and utilizing
data to drive instruction
Provide on-going
Parent Training to
continuously inform
parents of Mathematics
Program &
Curr/CCSS/SPI’s and
TCAP Assessment
goals; and effective
strategies to utilize
w/assisting their child at
home.
Family Math/Science
Night
Once per Nine
Weeks
Committee
53
Action Steps
2.Conduct Weekly Data
Talk Sessions
Timeline
Aug.’12-May’13
(on-going)
Person(s) Responsible
Veronica Parish, Principal
Projected Cost(s)
Resources
N/A
Mary Rodgers, Instr. Fac.



Utilize data to
determine instructional
decisions
Identify non-mastery
SPIs/CCSS
Discuss implementation
of effective research
based teaching
strategies, higher order
thinking
skills/activities,
differentiating
instruction, educational
journals, articles, books
and novels.
Action Steps
3. Provide, Implement &
Monitor timely
interventions


Implement the
following District
Initiatives: EPGY,
Stanford LAW,
Provide After-School
Enrichment
Evaluation
Procedures



Teachers/Educational
Assistants/Interventionists
Parents


Timeline
Person(s) Responsible
Aug.’12-May’13
(on-going)
Veronica Parish, Principal
Mary Rodgers, Instr. Fac.
Earnestine Benton,
Counselor
Teachers/Educational
Assistants/Interventionists
Parents
Projected Cost(s)
Funding Sources
District Budget
Title I Budget
$2,500.00
PLC Agendas &
Minutes
Student Data
Evaluating the
Integrity of
Assessments
Lesson plans
reflecting research
based strategies,
Embedding
Literacy/Numeracy,
higher order
thinking
skills/activities and
novels
Checklist of
recorded mastery &
non-mastery SPIs
Evaluation Strategy
Progress Monitoring
Increased scores on
Summative 2013
Mathematics(TCAP)
Assessments
from 24.2%-34%.
Increase and maintain
students scoring
Proficient/Advance on
Weekly Assessment and
Discovery Ed.
Performance
Results/Outcome
85% of Tier III students
will show improvement.
Updated EdPlan
Attendance
Extended Contract
$6,500.00
Performance/Results/
Outcomes
Student Data
Checklist of mastery &
non-mastery SPIs
Increased scores on
Summative 2013
Mathematics(TCAP)
Assessments
from 24.2%-34%.
Increase and maintain
students scoring
Proficient/Advance on
54
Weekly Assessment and
Discovery Ed.
4. Administer the
Kindergarten
Readiness
Indicator (KRI)
Assessment
 Utilize data to identify
students’ strengthens
and weaknesses.
 Utilize data to
determine instructional
decisions.
 Conduct Parent
meetings to discuss
Kindergarten Readiness
Indicator (KRI),
Kindergarten
5.



Integrate Common
Core Standards in
Project- Based Think
Show
Provide on-going PD
on Common Core State
Standards
Attend Curator PD
Provide Think Show
PD for parents,
Aug. ’12 (KRI)
Aug.12-May’13
(on-going)
Kindergarten Teachers
District Budget
Veronica Parish, Principal
Title I Budget $350.00
Mary Rodgers,
Instructional facilitator
Veronica Parish, Principal
Aug’12-May’13
Mary Rodgers,
Instructional facilitator
March’13
District Staff
Teachers
Community Leaders,
Title I Budget
$2,000.00
Kindergarten Readiness
Indicator (KRI)
Assessment Data
90% Kindergarten students
will meet or exceed
standards
Parent Meeting Agendas
& Sign-In Sheets
Increase Parental
Knowledge of student’s
readiness level and
Kindergarten expectations
Teachers/Jurors
Exemplary Ratings
Evaluation of student
Think Show Projects
55
community leaders
and,/ adopters
parents and adopters
\
56
Component 4 Template 4.1 GOAL 3– ACTION PLAN DEVELOPMENT- Science
Goal 3: Grades 3-5 we will increase the percentage of students scoring Advanced/Proficient in Science from 20% to 30% (No AMO) given.
How is this Goal linked to the system’s Five-Year Plan? The district/ school has adopted the Tennessee Comprehensive System Wide Planning Process as its five year
long range plan
1.











Action Step
Template 4.2
Monitor/Evaluate
Direct/Explicit
Instructions in
Science and
Implementation of
Common Core
Standards to increase
Proficiency
Good First Teaching
Differentiated Instruction
Utilizing Thinking Maps
Incorporate Marzano’s
Strategies for Learning
Embed Literacy & Numeracy
Departmentalize 4th and 5th
Grades
Projects & Experiments
Mock TCAP Assessments
Utilize student data to
maintain current and accurate
information on each student
and to determine instructional
decisions.
Provide daily review of
previous taught skills through
DO Nows/Bell Ringers
Provide on-going PD on
Present research based
strategies, CCSS, Best
Practices, Analyzing and
Time Line
Template 4.3
Aug’12-May’13
(on-going)
Person(s) Responsible
Veronica Parish, Principal
Projected Cost(s) &
Funding Sources
Title I Budget
$6,200.00
Mary Rodgers, Instr. Fac.
Dr. Kendra Hargrove,
Regional Literacy Coach
Dr. Patton, Regional
Mathematics Coach
Facilitator Salary
$62,000.00
Title I Professional
Development Budget
$2,000.00
Evaluation Strategy




Regional Science Coach
Teachers/Educational
Assistants/Interventionists
Parents


Walkthroughs
Obs./Evals
(TEM)
PLC Agendas &
Minutes
Lesson Plans
reflecting Good
First Teaching,
rigor,
differentiated
instruction,
Embedding
Literacy/
Numeracy, SPIs,
CCSS and
Higher Order
thinking skills
Parent
Packets/Sign-In
Rosters
Parent Surveys
Performance
Results/Outcomes
Increased scores on
Summative 2013
Science(TCAP)
Assessments
from 20%-30%
TEMs Ratings 3,4,5
Increase 40% Parental
Involvement
57


utilizing data to drive
instruction
Provide on-going Parent
Training to continuously
inform parents of Science
Curr/CCSS/SPI’s and TCAP
Assessment goals; and
effective strategies to utilize
w/assisting their child at
home.
Family Math/Science Night
2.Conduct Weekly Data
Talk Sessions
Once per Nine Weeks
Aug.’12-May’13
(on-going)
Math/Science Committee
Veronica Parish, Principal
Mary Rodgers, Instr. Fac.



Utilize data to determine
instructional decisions
Identify non-mastery
SPIs/CCSS
Discuss implementation of
effective research based
teaching strategies, higher
order thinking skills/activities,
differentiating instruction,
educational journals, articles,
books and novels.
Teachers/Educational
Assistants/Interventionists
Parents
N/A





PLC Agendas &
Minutes
Student Data
Evaluating the
Integrity of
Assessments
Lesson plans
reflecting
research based
strategies,
Embedding
Literacy/Numera
cy, higher order
thinking
skills/activities
and novels
Checklist of
recorded
mastery & nonmastery SPIs
Increased scores on
Summative 2013
Science(TCAP)
Assessments
from 20%-30%
Increase and maintain
students scoring
Proficient/Advance on
Weekly Assessment
and Discovery Ed.
58
3.

Integrate Technology
Utilize BrainPop, Unites
Streaming, Webquest,
EBeams, Teacher/Student
Mobis, Video Presentations,
Power Points, etc.
Aug.’12-May’13
(on-going)
Teachers
Title I Budget
$23,000.00

Veronica Parish, Principal

Mary Rodgers, Instructional
Facilitator

Action Steps
4.



Integrate Common
Core Standards in ProjectBased Think Show
Provide on-going PD on
Common Core State Standards
Attend Curator PD
Provide Think Show PD for
parents, community leaders
and,/ adopters
Timeline
Aug. ’12 (KRI)
Person(s) Responsible
Veronica Parish, Principal
Mary Rodgers, Instructional
facilitator
Aug.12-May’13
(on-going)
District Staff
Teachers
Community Leaders,
Projected Cost(s)
Resources
Title I Budget
$2,000.00
Evaluating the
Integrity of
Assessments
Lesson plans
reflecting
research based
strategies,
Embedding
Literacy/Numera
cy, higher order
thinking
skills/activities
and novels
Checklist of
recorded
mastery & nonmastery SPIs
Evaluation
Procedures
Teachers/Jurors
Evaluation of student
Think Show Projects
Increased scores on
Summative 2013
Science(TCAP)
Assessments
from 20%-30%
Increase and maintain
students scoring
Proficient/Advance on
Weekly Assessment
and Discovery Ed.
Performance/Results/
Outcomes
Exemplary Ratings
59