UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL ABIERTA Y A DISTANCIA
Rúbrica de evaluación
Trabajo colaborativo No 1
Pre-task
Course: Phonetics and phonology
Criteria for individual work
Evaluated items
Task 1: Presenting your current
knowledge about Phonetics and
Phonology.
Task 2:
Organizing the course concepts in a
concept map.
Task 3:
Defining, comparing and
understanding concepts.
Task 4:
Practice of phonetic symbols
High
The student wrote the short reflection for
task 1 writing what he/she knew about the
concepts. Good use of language is shown.
Average
The student wrote the short reflection
for task 1 but it didn’t fit what was
required in the guide. Grammar,
lexical and syntactic errors were
evident in the text.
P/ max.
Poor
The student didn’t write the short reflection
for task 1 on the forum
2
(2 points)
(1 point)
(0 points)
The student designed a map showing all the
concepts and their definitions. It is clear,
creative and well-organized. Good use of
language is shown
The student designed the map but
some concepts are missing, or they
are ill-defined. Is not creative,
unclear, or ill-structured.
The student didn’t design the concept map.
3
(3 points)
(1 point)
(0 points)
The student made a comparative chart
showing the concepts asked. They are
well-defined, organized and includes
examples and clear information.
The student did the chart but the
concepts are ill-defined, information
is not clear and has a bad
presentation. Grammar, lexical and
syntactic errors were evident in the
text.
The student didn’t make the comparative
chart with the concepts asked.
(5 points)
(3 points)
(0 points)
The student completed the whole chart to
practice phonetic symbols, and it does not
have any mistakes.
The student completed the chart to
practice phonetic symbols, but it has
5
The student did not complete the chart to
practice phonetic symbols.
3
a lot of mistakes or some of the
answers are missing.
Task 5:
Reflecting upon previous and new
knowledge.
(3 points)
(1 point)
(0 points)
The student wrote a text about his/her
reflections. It’s clear stated what he/she
knew and knows now. He/she checked the
e-mates’ posts to reflect too. Good use of
language is shown.
The student wrote the text but it
didn’t fit what was asked. The
reflection is poor and it didn’t show
that he/she checked the e-mates’
contributions. Grammar, lexical and
syntactic errors were evident in the
text.
The student didn’t write the text.
(10 points)
(5 points)
(0 points)
Criteria for group work
Aspectos evaluados
Participation and interaction on the
forum
10
High
The student read the e-mates’
contributions, commented them and gave
meaningful feedback in order to improve
aspects or to reflect on knowledge.
Average
The student made some comments
about the e-mates’ contributions but
weren’t meaningful and the feedback
given was not useful to learn.
(2 points)
(1 point)
Poor
The student didn’t comment on his/her emates’ contributions or didn’t give
meaningful feedback in order to improve
aspects or to reflect on knowledge.
2
(0 points)
TOTAL SCORE COLLABORATIVE TASK
25
UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL ABIERTA Y A DISTANCIA
Rúbrica de evaluación
Trabajo colaborativo No 2
Task cycle
Course: Phonetics and phonology
Criteria for individual work
Evaluated items
Accuracy of individual
contribution in Written stage
Individual document format
Written stage
Pronunciation (accurate
production of English sounds)
Oral stage
Greeting and presentation
Oral stage
Quality of audio
Oral stage
High
Individual contribution in the Written stage
answers accurately the selected exercises
from the ones required
(25 points)
The individual contribution is uploaded in
the correct forum (Written stage) in a Word
file, including the selected exercises and
named according to indications
(25 points)
The audio includes the whole text and it is
pronounced accurately according to
English consonants and vowels production
or it has just a few pronunciation mistakes
Average
There is an individual contribution but
it does not answer all selected
exercises correctly
(12 points)
The individual contribution is
uploaded but not in the indicated
forum or it is not in a Word file or it is
not named according to the indications
(12 points)
The audio of the text is incomplete or
it includes a lot of pronunciation and
intonation mistakes
Poor
There is not and individual contribution in
the Written stage
(35 points)
(17 points)
(0 points)
At the beginning of the audio there is a
greeting and presentation according to
indications. At the end it is thankful and
says good-bye.
There is a greeting but no farewell at
the end or there is a farewell at the
end but no greeting at the beginning
of the audio.
(5 points)
(2 points)
(0 points)
The audio is neat with a good volume level
and no noise in the background
The volume of the audio is too low or
it has lots of interference and noise in
the background
The volume of the audio is too low and it
has lots of interference and noise in the
background
P/
máxima
25
(0 points)
There is not an individual contribution.
25
(0 points)
The text is not pronounced according to
English standard for production of
consonants and vowels
The audio includes just the text, with no
greeting or presentation
35
5
15
(15 points)
Format of audio
Oral stage
The audio is uploaded as a link with the
correct name according to indications.
(10 points)
Accuracy of collaborative
document
Written stage
Format of final group document
Written stage
(0 points)
The audio is not uploaded as a link or
it is not named correctly.
The audio is uploaded as a link which
cannot be heard or the tutor cannot have
access to it.
(5 points)
(0 points)
10
Criteria for group work
Evaluated items
Social interaction in the
Written stage forum
(7 points)
High
Meaningful
comments
to
peers’
contributions helped build the group
document
(15 points)
The leader of the group assembles all
individual contributions in a word file,
which includes the correct answers to all the
required exercises and the links of the
audios.
Average
Comments to peers’ contributions are
not enough to build the final group
document
(7 points)
The group document does not include
the answers to all the required
exercises or not all the answers are
correct or the links are not pasted on
the word file.
Poor
(35 points)
The group file is uploaded in the required
format, in the Written stage forum and it is
named according to instructions
(15 points)
(17 points)
(0 points)
The group document is not
The group does not consolidate a
uploaded following all instructions
collaborative document
in regards of format and name
(7 points)
(0 points)
TOTAL SCORE COLLABORATIVE TASK
No comments were made to peers’
individual contributions
15
(0 points)
The group leader does not assemble in a
single document all individual
contributions.
35
15
180
UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL ABIERTA Y A DISTANCIA
Rúbrica de evaluación
Trabajo colaborativo No 3
Final task
Course: Phonetics and phonology
Criteria for individual work
Evaluated items
Accuracy of individual
contribution in Written stage
Individual document format
Written stage
Pronunciation (accurate
production of English sounds,
word stress and intonation)
Oral stage
High
Individual contribution in the written
stage answers accurately the exercises
from the ones required.
Average
There is an individual
contribution but it does not
answer all the exercises or not all
the exercises are correctly
answered.
Poor
There is not and individual
contribution on the Written stage.
(20 points)
The individual contribution is
uploaded in the correct forum (Written
stage) in a Word file, including the all
the exercises and named according to
indications.
(10 points)
The individual contribution is
uploaded but not on the indicated
forum or it is not in a Word file or
it is not named according to the
indications.
(0 points)
There is not an individual contribution.
(10 points)
(5 points)
(0 points)
The audio includes all words from
exercise 9, and they are pronounced
accurately according to word stress,
and intonation.
The audio of the sentences is
incomplete or it includes a lot of
pronunciation, stress and
intonation mistakes
The sentences are not pronounced
according to word stress and
intonation.
(30 points)
(15 points)
(0 points)
P/
máxima
25
10
30
Greeting and presentation
Oral stage
Quality of audio
Oral stage
At the beginning of the audio, there is
a greeting and presentation according
to indications. At the end it is thankful
and says good-bye
There is a greeting but no farewell
at the end or there is a farewell at
the end but no greeting at the
beginning of the audio.
The audio includes just the words and
dialogue, with no greeting or
presentation or farewell.
(5 points)
(2 points)
(0 points)
The audio is neat with a good volume
level and no noise in the background.
The audio is uploaded as a link with
the correct name according to
indications.
The volume of the audio is low or
it has lots of interference and
noise in the background. The
audio is not uploaded as a link or
it is not named correctly.
The volume of the audio is too low
and it has lots of interference and noise
in the background. The audio is not
uploaded as a link or it is not named
correctly.
(5 points)
(2 points)
(0 points)
Accuracy of collaborative
document.
Written stage
5
Criteria for group work
Evaluated items
Social interaction on the
Written stage forum
5
High
Meaningful comments to peers’
contributions helped build the group
document.
Average
Comments to peers’ contributions
are not enough to build the final
group document.
(10 points)
The leader of the group assembles all
individual contributions in a Word file,
which includes the correct answers to
all the required exercises (questions 1
to 8 and links of individual recordings)
(5 points)
The group document does not
include the answers to all the
required exercises or not all the
answers are correct or there are
exercises missing.
(30 points)
(15 points)
Poor
No comments were made to peers’
individual contributions.
10
(0 points)
The group leader does not assemble in
a single document all individual
contributions.
(0 points)
30
Format of final group
document. Written stage
The group file is uploaded in the
required format, in the Written stage
forum and it is named according to
instructions.
The group document is not
uploaded following all
instructions in regards of format
and name.
(10 points)
(5 points)
The group does not consolidate a
collaborative document.
(0 points)
TOTAL SCORE COLLABORATIVE TASK
10
125