The Use of Chloroformamidine Hydrochloride as a Reagent for the Synthesis of Guanidines from Electron Deficient Aromatic Amines Ian Armitage, ‡ Mingkun Fu,‡ Frederick Hicks,† Adiseshu Kattuboina,§ Jennifer S. N. Li,† Ashley McCarron,*,† and Lei Zhu† † Chemical Development Laboratories Boston, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Company, 35 Landsdowne Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States ‡ Analytical Development Laboratories Boston, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Company, 35 Landsdowne Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States § Chemical Development, Albany Molecular Research Incorporated, 21 Corporate Circle, Albany, New York 12212, United States Supporting Information Table of Contents Analysis and Stability of Chloroformamidine Hydrochloride ...................................................................... 1 Condition Screening Data ............................................................................................................................. 6 Chloroformamidine Hydrochloride Equivalent Screening Data ................................................................... 7 1 H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS Spectra ...................................................................................................... 8 Analysis and Stability of Chloroformamidine Hydrochloride Analysis S1 It was found that chloroformamidine HCl (3) reacts rapidly with methanol to give omethylisourea. High resolution mass spectrum (HRMS) of 3 in methanol gave a protonated molecular ion signal at m/z 75.0550 corresponding to o-methylisourea, with no signal observed for the protonated chloroformamidine (Figure 1). Furthermore, 13 C NMR gave deuterated o- methylisourea signals for 3 in CD3OD (Figure 2). Such observations allowed for the utilization of methanol-induced derivatization of 3 to assess its purity, for which a LC/HRMS quantitation method was developed. Figure 1. High Resolution Mass Spectrum of Chloroformamidine HCl (3) in MeOH LeiMeOH4 #180-210 RT: 1.59-1.82 AV: 10 SB: 18 1.03-1.17 , 2.68-2.98 NL: 1.09E7 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [50.00-500.00] 75.0550 10000000 9000000 8000000 Intensity 7000000 6000000 5000000 4000000 3000000 2000000 1000000 76.0583 0 50 100 117.0770 170.0012 150 220.6167 200 271.5452 307.1520 250 300 365.0040 401.4145 432.2280 350 400 m/z Figure 2. 13C NMR (125 Hz) Spectrum of Chloroformamidine HCl (3) in CD3OD S2 450 495.7550 500 An ultra high performance liquid chromatography instrument (UHPLC) was utilized for chromatographic separation. This UHPLC system is comprised of an autosampler, micro mixer (180μL), high pressure HPLC pump, and vacuum degasser.. The injection volume was set to 1 μL. The column was a 2.6 μm Hilic 100Å, 150 mm x 3.0 mm column. 0.1% TFA in water was selected for aqueous phase A and 0.1% TFA in acetonitrile was selected for organic phase B. The flow rate was 1 mL/min and column temperature was set at ambient. The following gradient was used for a total run of 10 minutes: starting at 95% B and decreasing to 75% B in 4 minutes, decreasing again to 10% B in 0.1 minute, holding at 10% B for 0.9 minutes, increasing back to 95% B in 0.5 minutes, and subsequently holding at 95% B for 4.5 minutes. About 5% LC flow elute solution was directed via a “T” splitter to a LTQ mass spectrometer. The instrument was S3 tuned and calibrated in positive mode by using electrospray ionization (ESI) positive ion calibration solution. The capillary of heated ESI interface (HESI-II) was set to 5000 V for source voltage, 100 μA for source current, and 60% for S-Lens RF level. The capillary temperature was set to 275°C. Sheath gas was set to 40 units. Profile algorithm mass spectrometry data were acquired with the range of m/z 50 - m/z 500 under mass resolving power (MRP) of 30,000. The extracted ion chromatography (EIC) signal was extracted at m/z 75.0553 with a mass extraction window (MEW) of 10 ppm. To assess the purity of synthesized 3, blank samples (1 mg/mL reference and 1 mg/mL 3) were first analyzed according to equation [1] (Figure 3a). o-Methylisourea bisulfate (CAS number: 29427-58-5) was purchased and used as the reference standard to quantify 3. The purity of 3 was investigated by using equation [1], where Area (sample) is the EIC peak area response of 3; MW (sample) is the molecular weight of 3 (115.0 g/mol); Area (reference) is the EIC peak area response of o-methylisourea bisulfate; and MW (reference) is the molecular weight of omethylisourea bisulfate (172.2 g/mol) (Figure 3b). The purity of two different lots of 3 were then determined and found to be 94.4% (batch 1) and 89.3% (batch 2) (Figure 3, c and d respectively). Furthermore, in order to evaluate the precision of the measured purity value, triplicate measurements of a separate lot of 3 (Lot E2908-43) were performed by testing three independently prepared samples and references. The purity values obtained from these analyses were 80.4%, 83.5%, and 80.8% with a mean of 81.6% and an excellent relative standard deviation of 2.1%. Purity Area( sample) MW ( sample) Area(reference) MW (reference) [1] S4 Figure 3. Purity Assessment of Chloroformamidine HCl (3) using LC/HRMS Analysis a) Extracted ion chromatogram of blank injection RT: 0.00 - 10.00 0.29 Relative Abundance 100 0.90 NL: 1.92E4 1.10 1.49 1.74 9.16 80 2.05 2.32 2.82 60 3.44 3.59 4.35 8.45 8.68 6.88 7.06 7.16 4.56 4.75 40 8.31 7.42 6.78 6.41 6.73 5.50 9.81 m/z= 75.0545-75.0561 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [50.00-500.00] MS Blank_1 20 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Time (min) b) Extracted ion chromatogram of reference o-methylisourea bisulfate RT: 0.00 - 10.01 RT: 1.79 AA: 134922279 Relative Abundance 100 NL: 2.17E7 m/z= 75.0545-75.0561 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [50.00-500.00] MS Genesis Ref _1 80 60 40 20 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Time (min) c) Extracted ion chromatogram of chloroformamidine HCl (batch 1) RT: 0.00 - 10.00 RT: 1.78 AA: 190725012 Relative Abundance 100 NL: 2.33E7 m/z= 75.0545-75.0561 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [50.00-500.00] MS Genesis A6_1 80 60 40 20 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Time (min) d) Extracted ion chromatogram of chloroformamidine HCl (batch 2) S5 9 RT: 0.00 - 10.01 RT: 1.80 AA: 180457349 Relative Abundance 100 NL: 2.14E7 m/z= 75.0545-75.0561 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [50.00-500.00] MS Genesis A22_1 80 60 40 20 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Time (min) Stability To assess the stability of 3, samples stored under nitrogen at ambient temperature were analyzed after 6 months and compared with the initial purity data (t = 0) collected. As can be seen from the data below, significant degradation occurred over the 6 months of storage and use. Based on this information, it is recommended that the material be stored under nitrogen at 0-5°C if possible to prolong the shelf life of 3. Sample Batch 1 Batch 2 Purity (%) t=0 t = 6 mos. 94.4 89.3 76.5 70.5 Condition Screening Data S6 entrya 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10c 11c 12d 13c,d 14c 15c,d 16c,d 17 temp. conversion (%)b 3 (°C) (equiv) 5a 4a Imp(s). AcOH 60 1.2 29 2 69 DMF 100 1.2 40 4 56 DMSO 120 1.2 7 66 27 NMP 100 1.2 17 9 74 DMAc 100 1.2 12 59 29 EtOH 100 1.2 51 37 12 IPA 80 1.2 11 89 0 t-butanol 100 1.8 66 25 9 2-butanol 60 1.2 20 80 0 dimethoxyethane 80 1.2 67 16 17 MeCN 80 1.2 65 29 6 MeCN/AcOH 80 1.2 71 1 28 MeCN/sulfolane 80 1.2 >99 <1 0 dioxane 100 1.2 64 36 0 dioxane/AcOH 100 1.4 94 6 0 dioxane/sulfolane 80 1.2 74 26 0 sulfolane 100 1.2 97 2 1 Solvent a All reactions conducted on a 2.1 mmol scale in 10 vol. solvent (sampled over 24h - table displays best conversion) b Conversion was determined by LC/MS of the in-process reaction mixture c Heterogeneous reaction at certain temperatures d Solvent ratio 10:1 Chloroformamidine Hydrochloride Equivalent Screening Data This screen investigated the optimal amount of 3 from 1.2 to 2.0 equivalents. As can be seen in the table below, improvements in conversion occurred from 1.2 to 1.4 equivalents, with no S7 significant progress achieved when > 1.4 equivalents was used. Also, the need to remove excess 3 when the larger amounts were utilized made product isolation increasingly more difficult. For these reasons, 1.4 equivalents of 3 were chosen as optimal for the substrate screen. entrya 1 2 Solvent MeCN/AcOH sulfolane conversion to 5a (%)b 3 (equiv) 60 °C 80 °C 100 °C 1.2 65 71 33c 1.4 77 77 18c 1.6 82 72 54c 1.8 78 52 65c 2.0 82 77 69c 1.2 90 84 97 1.4 98 97 95 1.6 95 95 93 1.8 97 95 91 2.0 94 94 92 a All reactions conducted on a 2.1 mmol scale in 10 vol. solvent (sampled over 24h - table displays best conversion) b Conversion was determined by LC/MS of the in-process reaction mixture c Heating the MeCN/AcOH mixture above the boiling point of MeCN evaporated solvent, decreasing solubility, and therefore invalidated these results 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS Spectra S8 S9 S10 2 Li2 #72-92 RT: 0.64-0.81 AV: 10 SB: 36 0.27-0.51 , 0.90-1.27 NL: 2.28E6 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [101.00-1500.00] 236.1865 2200000 2000000 1800000 1600000 Intensity 1400000 1200000 1000000 800000 118.5967 600000 400000 200000 148.0869 191.1290 219.1604 0 150 200 252.1818 250 303.2039 300 m/z 350.1799 350 402.2133 444.2739 471.3663 400 S11 450 S12 S13 5a Li1 #67-86 RT: 0.59-0.75 AV: 10 SB: 36 0.26-0.52 , 0.90-1.27 NL: 3.16E6 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [101.00-1500.00] 137.0818 3000000 2500000 Intensity 2000000 1500000 1000000 120.0553 152.0677 500000 179.1037 204.0991 235.0000 273.1569 309.1337 0 150 200 250 300 m/z 350.1644 371.1257 350 400 S14 425.0979 465.0789 450 S15 S16 5b E3329_39_140811150639 #65-71 RT: 0.64-0.70 AV: 4 SB: 11 0.45-0.53 , 0.82-0.94 NL: 5.16E6 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [105.00-1000.00] 205.0690 5000000 4500000 4000000 Intensity 3500000 3000000 2500000 2000000 1500000 1000000 500000 0 188.0426 209.0627 308.0174 200 300 471.0522 515.2822 577.0426 644.9294 713.0158 825.3355 905.0208 957.0502 400 500 600 700 m/z S17 800 900 1000 S18 S19 5c Li8 #308-336 RT: 2.74-2.98 AV: 14 SB: 42 2.12-2.51 , 3.16-3.49 NL: 3.85E6 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [101.00-1500.00] 187.0973 3500000 3000000 Intensity 2500000 2000000 1500000 1000000 500000 170.0709 145.0759 128.0492 0 150 214.0867 237.0981 200 250 285.0658 317.1719 300 m/z 373.1883 400.1800 350 400 S20 471.1549 450 S21 S22 5e A1 #75-83 RT: 0.76-0.84 AV: 5 SB: 6 0.73-0.75 , 0.92-1.02 NL: 8.84E5 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [105.00-1000.00] 204.0742 800000 700000 Intensity 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 206.0809 187.0477 0 200 250.9728 291.9992 402.2696 446.2962 300 400 568.0550 646.0720 702.1356 786.0845 873.1765 500 600 700 m/z S23 800 900 956.0384 1000 S24 S25 5f Li5 #768-786 RT: 6.78-6.92 AV: 9 SB: 49 6.30-6.62 , 7.20-7.73 NL: 1.22E7 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [101.00-1500.00] 249.0586 12000000 11000000 10000000 9000000 Intensity 8000000 7000000 6000000 5000000 4000000 3000000 2000000 1000000 0 189.0269 159.0288 200 308.0964 300 419.2013 497.1111 595.0782 649.0507 400 500 600 785.0241 700 m/z S26 800 897.1029 948.8795 900 1000 S27 S28 5g Li3 #102-134 RT: 0.91-1.17 AV: 16 SB: 35 0.69-0.85 , 1.45-1.89 NL: 4.54E6 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [101.00-1500.00] 152.0813 4500000 4000000 3500000 Intensity 3000000 2500000 2000000 1500000 135.0551 166.0610 1000000 500000 184.0715 210.0873 242.0923 0 150 200 250 301.1407 300 m/z 341.1035 401.1241 350 400 S29 455.0959 450 492.1773 500 S30 S31 S32 S33 5j Li9 #1005-1036 RT: 8.90-9.17 AV: 16 SB: 29 8.58-8.78 , 9.46-9.74 NL: 2.51E6 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [101.00-1500.00] 226.0969 2400000 2200000 2000000 1800000 Intensity 1600000 1400000 1200000 1000000 800000 600000 400000 200000 209.0709 0 200 240.0765 300 347.1463 451.1875 400 577.3664 656.3192 500 600 738.4442 808.7724 700 m/z S34 800 942.2122 900 S35 S36 5m A7 #75-82 RT: 0.76-0.82 AV: 4 SB: 9 0.62-0.67 , 0.94-1.04 NL: 2.95E6 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [105.00-1000.00] 190.1084 2500000 Intensity 2000000 1500000 1000000 173.0818 500000 0 379.2101 206.1034 200 300 400 493.2027 547.1221 500 600 685.2070 757.9939 807.5592 898.0855 975.7948 700 m/z S37 800 900 1000 S38 S39 5n A4 #73-80 RT: 0.74-0.80 AV: 4 SB: 14 0.48-0.60 , 0.93-1.06 NL: 3.51E6 F: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [105.00-1000.00] 192.0586 3500000 3000000 Intensity 2500000 2000000 1500000 195.0577 1000000 150.0370 500000 250.9722 0 200 383.1106 300 400 497.1032 551.0220 500 600 666.0570 742.0737 797.7503 700 m/z S40 800 926.4885 900 1000