Prepared for
Michigan Race Equity Coalition
2010 – 2012 Michigan
Child Welfare
Disproportionate
Minority Contact
Data Book
Prepared by
Public Policy Associates, Incorporated
March 2013
Public Policy Associates, Incorporated is a public policy research, development, and
evaluation firm headquartered in Lansing, Michigan. The firm serves clients nationally in the
public, private, and nonprofit sectors at the national, state, and local levels by conducting
research, analysis, and evaluation that supports informed strategic decision making.
119 Pere Marquette Drive, Suite 1C, Lansing, MI 48912-1231,
(517) 485-4477, Fax 485-4488, www.publicpolicy.com
Table of Contents
Explanation of Data Terms ............................................................................................. 1
Definition of Child Welfare Decision Points ................................................................ 3
Disproportionality Highlights in Michigan, 2010-2012 .............................................. 5
Child Welfare Disproportionality.............................................................................. 5
Data Tables ........................................................................................................................ 9
Michigan Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2010 ..............................11
Michigan Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2011 ..............................12
Michigan Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ..............................13
Alcona County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ....................14
Alger County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ......................15
Allegan County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ..................16
Alpena County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ...................17
Antrim County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ...................18
Arenac County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ....................19
Baraga County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ....................20
Barry County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012.......................21
Bay County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ..........................22
Benzie County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012.....................23
Berrien County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ...................24
Branch County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ....................25
Calhoun County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 .................26
Cass County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ........................27
Charlevoix County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 .............28
Cheboygan County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ............29
Chippewa County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ..............30
Clare County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 .......................31
Clinton County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ...................32
Crawford County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ...............33
Delta County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 .......................34
Dickinson County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ..............35
Eaton County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ......................36
Emmet County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ....................37
Genesee County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ..................38
Gladwin County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 .................39
Gogebic County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ..................40
Grand Traverse County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012.....41
Gratiot County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ....................42
Hillsdale County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ................43
Houghton County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ..............44
Huron County Michigan Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ...45
Ingham County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012...................46
Ionia County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 .......................47
Iosco County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 .......................48
Iron County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 .........................49
Isabella County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ...................50
Jackson County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ...................51
Kalamazoo County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ............52
Kalkaska County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ................53
Kent County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ........................54
Keweenaw County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 .............55
Lake County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ........................56
Lapeer County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ....................57
Leelanau County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ................58
Lenawee County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ................59
Livingston County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 .............60
Luce County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ........................61
Mackinac County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ...............62
Macomb County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 .................63
Manistee County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ................64
Marquette County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ..............65
Mason County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ....................66
Mecosta County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ..................67
Menominee County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ...........68
Midland County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 .................69
Missaukee County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012..............70
Monroe County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ..................71
Montcalm County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ..............72
Montmorency County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 .......73
Muskegon County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012..............74
Newaygo County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ...............75
Oakland County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 .................76
Oceana County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ...................77
Ogemaw County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ................78
Ontonagon County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ............79
Osceola County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ..................80
Oscoda County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ...................81
Otsego County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ....................82
Ottawa County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ...................83
Presque Isle County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ...........84
Roscommon County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ..........85
Saginaw County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 .................86
St. Clair County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ..................87
St. Joseph County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ...............88
Sanilac County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ....................89
Schoolcraft County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 .............90
Shiawassee County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ............91
Tuscola County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ...................92
Van Buren County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 .............93
Washtenaw County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ...........94
Wayne County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 ....................95
Wexford County Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary, 2012 .................96
Michigan Child Welfare Data Book| Public Policy Associates, Inc.
1
Explanation of Data Terms
This data book contains, for the State of Michigan, a table that summarizes how
different racial groups moved through the child welfare system in 2010–2012.
The tables show three things: (1) the number of juveniles at each of the decision
points, (2) the relative rate index (RRI) for that decision point, and (3) whether
that RRI is statistically significant (via formatting).
Why use a count (e.g., “number of cases”)?
A simple tally of the number of occurrences (of disposition, placement, or
whatever specific point is under examination) is the most basic unit of
analysis. It is especially useful for comparing magnitude—for example, in 2010,
two juveniles were placed out of home in Alcona County as were 134 juveniles in
Oakland County. That large difference in scale creates important differences in
child welfare and in appropriate policy responses in the two jurisdictions.
What is relative rate?
A relative rate compares the rate for a minority group to the rate of the
majority. For example, if the assignment rate for Hispanic juveniles in County A
is 50 per 1,000 Hispanic juveniles and the assignment rate for white juveniles is
25 per 1,000 white juveniles, then the relative rate is 2: cases are being assigned
for Hispanic juveniles in County A at twice the rate of white juveniles.
Why look at relative rate data?
Relative rates measure how disproportionate a system is. Relative rate data
provide standardization to the child welfare system in the area—the relative rate
for minority juveniles in Kent County is based on the experience of white
juveniles in Kent County’s child welfare system, the relative rate for minorities in
Alcona County is based on the experience of white juveniles in Alcona County’s
child welfare system, and so forth. It is thus the best single measurement of the
amount of disproportionate minority contact in a jurisdiction.
What is statistical significance?
Not all statistical occurrences that seem unlikely are statistically significant. For
example, a tossed coin could come up heads several times in a row, despite
heads and tails being equally likely. Statistical significance testing uses the size
of the sample and the degree to which the occurrence is outside the expected
2
Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
range to assess whether it is just “noise”—variation that can be expected in any
repeated event—or whether it is a significant finding.
Michigan Child Welfare Data Book| Public Policy Associates, Inc.
3
Definition of Child Welfare Decision
Points
1. Population at Risk (age 0-17): U.S. Census data.
2. Complaints Assigned for Investigation (Assignment): Alleged child abuse
or neglect reported to the Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS)
that if found true would constitute abuse and neglect within the meaning of
the Child Protection Law. Each child in a complaint is assigned to a worker
for a field investigation.
3. Child Protective Services (CPS) Disposition: Following a field investigation,
the Department’s findings are categorized into one of five levels:
a. Category I: CPS investigated and found a preponderance of evidence of
child abuse and/or neglect and the Child Protection Law or policy requires
a petition for court action. The perpetrator is listed on Central Registry.
b. Category II: CPS investigated and found a preponderance of evidence of
child abuse and/or neglect and the risk to the child is high or intensive.
CPS must open a protective services case and provide services. The
perpetrator is listed on Central Registry.
c. Category III: CPS investigated and found there was a preponderance of
evidence of child abuse and/or neglect and the risk to children was low or
moderate. CPS must assist the family in receiving community-based
services commensurate with the risk to the child. The perpetrator is not
listed on Central Registry.
d. Category IV: CPS investigated and found there was not a preponderance
of evidence of child abuse and/or neglect. CPS may assist the family in
accessing community-based services.
e. Category V: CPS investigated and found no evidence of child abuse
and/or neglect, or the family did not cooperate and the court did not
require them to cooperate, or the family cannot be located.
4. Out-of-Home Placement: The child is removed from the parental or custodial
home and placed out of home by court order at any time during the child
welfare proceedings during that reporting period.
5. Termination of Parental Rights: Both parents of the child have had their
parental rights terminated either through release or through a termination
trial and the appellate period expired during that reporting period.
4
Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
6. Children Exiting Foster Care: Child-level information by type of exit:
a. Reunification: The process of reuniting the child with the birth family,
which is widely recognized as the initial objective in foster care.
b. Adoption: After termination of parental rights, adoption is the preferred
goal with permanent legal guardianship as an alternate goal if in the best
interests of the child.
c. Guardianship: Juvenile guardianship is available for temporary and
permanent court wards and state wards when reunification or adoption
have been ruled out as permanency goals.
d. Relatives: The child is placed with a fit and willing relative in a permanent
placement when the child cannot be reunified, adopted, or placed in a
guardianship.
e. Aged Out: The child turned 18 and has not been reunified, adopted, or
placed in a guardianship or with relatives. This is not a permanency goal.
f. Death: Children who leave the foster care system through death due to
any cause (e.g., illness, accident, crime, or maltreatment).
Note: The data are collected at “point in time” by decision point for the year identified
rather than a “cohort” tracking method. All data need to be interpreted cautiously due to
the variance in practices between workers and counties. Centralized intake will provide
more consistency across the state with practices and data entry.
Michigan Child Welfare Data Book| Public Policy Associates, Inc.
5
Disproportionality Highlights in
Michigan, 2010-2012
This report displays relative rates and numbers of youth for each decision point
in the Child Welfare system, for both the state of Michigan in 2010-2012 and for
each county in 2012. This section also provides highlights of Disproportionate
Minority Contact (DMC) trends for Michigan. Readers can review county-level
data from the most recent year to see whether the same patterns are present.
For 2010-2011 county-level data, please contact Public Policy Associates, Inc. at
dfitzpatrick@publicpolicy.com.
Child Welfare Disproportionality

Changes 2010-2012:
 While there were too few 2012 cases to calculate a new RRI, deaths among
minority children served by CPS decreased from 13 in 2010 to 5 in 2012.
During the same period white child deaths increased from 9 to 12. Both
total child deaths and the disproportionate rate of deaths among minority
children decreased substantially from 2010 to 2012.
 The other changes during this period were smaller:
 The RRI for assignments for African-American youth decreased from
1.72 to 1.57.
 The RRI for out-of-home placements for Hispanics increased from 1.37
to 1.56.
 The RRI for termination of parental rights for Hispanics decreased
from 1.21 to 0.95.
 The RRI for aging out of foster care for African Americans increased
from 2.00 to 2.67.
 In Michigan in 2010:
 Child abuse/neglect complaints assigned for investigation among AfricanAmerican youth were 1.7 times more likely to occur than child
abuse/neglect complaints for white youth.
6

Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child abuse/neglect Category 1 dispositions among Hispanic youth were
1.25 times more likely to occur than child abuse/neglect Category 1
dispositions for white youth.
 Out-of-home placements among American-Indian or Alaska-Native youth
were 1.6 times more likely to occur than out-of-home placements for
white youth. For African-American youth, out-of-home placements were
1.3 times more likely; for Hispanic youth, 1.4 times more likely than white
youth.
 Terminations of parental rights for Hispanic youth were 1.2 times more
likely to occur than terminations of parental rights for white youth.
 African-American youth were 2.3 times more likely to die while in the
foster care system than white youth.
 In Michigan in 2011:
 Child abuse/neglect complaints assigned for investigation among AfricanAmerican youth were 1.6 times more likely to occur than child
abuse/neglect complaints for white youth.
 Out-of-home placements among both Hispanic and American-Indian or
Alaska-Native youth were 1.6 times more likely to occur than out-of-home
placements for white youth.
 Terminations of parental rights for African-American youth were 2.1
times more likely to occur than terminations of parental rights for white
youth (this rate is 0.94 for the state of Michigan)
 Adoptions for African-American youth were 1.1 times more likely to
occur than for white youth, and reunifications for African-American youth
were 1.4 times more likely to occur than for white youth. Since adoption
and reunification are the goals of the child welfare system, these figures
indicate that in Michigan in 2011, white youth did not fare as well as
African-American youth in exiting the foster care system in the mostpreferred ways. However, African-American youth were also 2.5 times
more likely to age out of the foster care system than white youth.
 American-Indian or Alaska-Native youth were 2.0 times more likely than
white youth to exit foster care by being placed with relatives. This seems
to indicate that Native youth are successfully being placed with Native
families, as is preferred.
 In Michigan in 2012:
 Child abuse/neglect complaints assigned for investigation among AfricanAmerican youth were 1.6 times more likely to occur than child
abuse/neglect complaints for white youth.
Michigan Child Welfare Data Book| Public Policy Associates, Inc.

7
Out-of-home placements among minority youth were 1.3 times more
likely to occur than out-of-home placements for white youth: 1.2 times
more likely for African-American youth, 1.6 times more likely for
Hispanic youth, and 1.6 times more likely for Native youth.
 African-American youth were 2.7 times more likely to age out of the foster
care system than white youth.
 As in 2011, minority youth overall and African-American youth
specifically exited foster care via adoption and reunification more
frequently than whites, but by a diminished margin: 1.1 times more likely
in both cases.
8
Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
Data Tables
9
10
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
11
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State: Michigan
All Counties
Reporting Period:
1/1/10 through 12/31/10
Black or
AfricanAmerican
White
Decision Point
Value
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17) 1,655,424
131,399
2. Assignment
5,835
3a. Category 1 Disposition
7,679
3b. Category 2 Disposition
9,412
3c. Category 3 Disposition
85,963
3d. Category 4 Disposition
8,254
3e. Category 5 Disposition
3,622
4. Out of Home Placement
1,411
5. Termination of Parental Rights
1,462
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
434
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
9
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
221
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
161
2,112
Hispanic or
Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
Islanders
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
426,187
171,847
70,678
0
19,932
0
688,644
58,101 1.72 8,227
0.60
713 0.13
52
-- 1,402 0.89
0
-- 68,495 1.25
2,854 1.11
456
1.25
22 0.69
0
**
70 1.12
0
-- 3,402 1.12
3,051 0.90
574
1.19
19 0.46
4
**
83 1.01
0
-- 3,731 0.93
3,931 0.94
548
0.93
71 1.39
9 2.42
72 0.72
0
-- 4,631 0.94
36,665 0.96 5,041
0.94
481 1.03
38 1.12
871 0.95
0
-- 43,096 0.96
3,680 1.01
488
0.94
59 1.32
0
**
155 1.76
0
-- 4,382 1.02
2,258 1.27
389
1.37
11
**
1
-69 1.59
0
-- 2,728 1.29
778 0.88
183
1.21
3
**
0
**
27 1.00
0
-991 0.93
950 1.04
193
1.23
4
**
3
**
34 1.22
0
-- 1,184 1.08
540 2.00
66
1.42
2
**
1
**
7 0.85
0
-616 1.88
13 2.32
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
-13 1.92
136
0.99
125 1.25
1,794 1.36
Yes
19
0.80
13
0.75
281
1.24
Yes
0
**
0
**
0
19
Yes
**
**
1
3
No
**
**
5
**
9 2.93
45 1.12
No
0
--
0
0
No
---
160
0.96
148 1.22
2,142 1.35
Yes
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed May 25,
2012, http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
12
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
All Counties
Reporting Period:
1/1/11 through 12/31/11
White
Decision Point
Value
1,615,860
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
148,659
2. Assignment
5,999
3a. Category 1 Disposition
8,869
3b. Category 2 Disposition
10,366
3c. Category 3 Disposition
101,048
3d. Category 4 Disposition
8,597
3e. Category 5 Disposition
3,270
4. Out of Home Placement
1,388
5. Termination of Parental Rights
1,411
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
402
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
8
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic or
Latino
Value
416,074
61,608
2,616
3,262
4,094
41,213
3,643
1,775
711
846
535
4
RRI
Value
1.61
1.05
0.89
0.95
0.98
1.02
1.24
0.94
1.10
2.45
**
172,831
9,125
416
616
555
5,968
564
355
179
174
70
0
167
1.08
119
1.25
1,594 1.41
Yes
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
0.57
1.13
1.13
0.87
0.96
1.07
1.57
1.19
1.14
1.60
**
71,827
769
26
32
55
551
44
9
8
3
2
0
0.12
0.84
0.70
1.03
1.05
0.99
**
**
**
**
**
0
92
3
0
5
66
4
2
2
0
0
0
19,220
-1,739
**
86
**
107
**
107
1.06 1,092
**
154
**
76
**
28
**
26
**
3
**
1
25
0.81
0
**
0
**
10
238
0.53
1.05
0
5
**
**
0
3
**
**
0.98
1.23
1.03
0.88
0.92
1.53
1.62
0.87
0.79
**
**
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
------------
0
73,333
3,147
4,017
4,816
48,890
4,409
2,217
928
1,049
610
5
1.17
1.06
0.92
0.94
0.98
1.04
1.29
0.99
1.10
2.24
**
11
1.66
0
--
203
1.05
8
36
1.97
0.74
0
0
---
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6f. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6g. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
285
175
2,082
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
0
**
1,876 1.33
Yes
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January
11, 2013, http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
13
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
All Counties
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Value
Value
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
1,615,860 416,074
160,723 65,107
2. Assignment
5,872
2,305
3a. Category 1 Disposition
8,786
3,011
3b. Category 2 Disposition
9,716
3,979
3c. Category 3 Disposition
115,525 45,313
3d. Category 4 Disposition
7,942
3,413
3e. Category 5 Disposition
2,415
1,168
4. Out of Home Placement
1,450
710
5. Termination of Parental Rights
1,476
786
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
359
463
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
12
4
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
RRI
Hispanic or
Latino
Asian
RRI
1.57
0.97
0.85
1.01
0.97
1.06
1.23
1.01
1.10
2.67
**
Value
172,831
10,794
420
619
667
7,423
473
270
154
164
63
1
0.63
1.07
1.05
1.02
0.96
0.89
1.56
0.95
0.99
1.57
**
Value
71,827
798
17
21
71
550
44
17
5
4
1
0
1.07
28
0.93
6
73
1.27
1,192
1.12
Yes
9
262
0.68
1.06
0
11
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
RRI Value RRI
0
0.11
60
-0.58
1
**
0.48
0
**
1.47
4
**
0.96
51
1.18
1.12
3
**
**
1
**
**
0
**
**
3
**
**
0
**
**
0
**
Value
19,220
1,784
110
94
107
1,158
165
70
31
31
7
0
**
0
**
14
1.79
0
--
**
**
1
2
**
**
3
46
**
0.72
0
0
---
All
Minorities
RRI Value RRI Value RRI
0
0
0.93
0
-78,543 1.16
1.69
0
-2,853 0.99
0.96
0
-3,745 0.87
0.99
0
-4,828 1.02
0.90
0
-54,495 0.97
1.87
0
-4,098 1.06
1.55
0
-1,526 1.30
0.74
0
-900
0.98
0.72
0
-988
1.06
0.67
0
-534
2.35
**
0
-5
**
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
270
Guardianship
6f. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6g. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
119
2,207
Yes
140
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
188
86
1.14
1,513 1.08
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
1.10
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
14
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Alcona County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
1,466
20
44
3
0
17
0
84
234
4
**
3
**
0
**
0
-2
**
0
-9
0.67
11
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
10
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-1
**
18
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
168
4
**
2
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-7
**
13
0
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-2
**
6
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-1
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
1
2
Yes
0
0
---
0
1
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
15
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Alger County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
1,358
16
48
16
0
143
0
223
157
0
**
2
**
0
**
0
-10
0.60
0
-12
0.47
5
0
-1
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-1
**
11
0
-0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
5
0
-0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
118
0
-1
**
0
-0
-14
**
0
-15
**
22
0
-0
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-1
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
3
0
--
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
**
0
2
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
-**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
-**
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
16
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Allegan County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
Value
Black or
AfricanAmerican
RRI
Value RRI
862
109
3
10
8
61
1
1
0
1
3
0
1.24
**
1.03
1.32
0.88
**
**
**
**
**
--
3,260
163
7
12
8
91
15
0
0
2
1
0
2
0
**
1
36
Yes
0
2
**
**
24,124
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2,455
2. Assignment
189
3a. Category 1 Disposition
218
3b. Category 2 Disposition
136
3c. Category 3 Disposition
1,556
3d. Category 4 Disposition
78
3e. Category 5 Disposition
44
4. Out of Home Placement
27
5. Termination of Parental Rights
37
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
4
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Value
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Value RRI
0.49
0.56
0.83
0.89
0.88
2.90
**
-----
278
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
2
---
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value RRI
Value RRI
Value RRI
Value RRI
**
**
**
**
**
**
------
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
------------
188
15
1
0
2
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
4
---
0.78
**
**
**
**
**
**
-----
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
0
---
------------
4,588
288
11
22
19
164
16
1
0
3
4
0
0.62
0.50
0.86
1.19
0.90
1.75
**
**
**
**
--
0
--
0
--
0
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
8
**
**
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
17
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Alpena County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
5,669
81
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
124
50
0
64
0
319
835
20
2. Assignment
1.68
5
**
1
**
0
-4
**
0
-30
0.64
45
4
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
0
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-4
**
20
1
3b. Category 2 Disposition
**
0
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-1
**
48
0
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
0
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-0
**
652
11
3d. Category 4 Disposition
**
5
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-16
**
56
0
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
0
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-0
**
19
0
4. Out of Home Placement
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
22
3
5. Termination of Parental Rights
-0
-1
-0
-0
-0
-0
-29
0
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-3
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
1
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
20
Yes
0
2
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
2
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
18
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Antrim County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
4,348
80
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
148
30
0
90
0
348
870
20
2. Assignment
1.25
11
0.37
2
**
0
-19
1.06
0
-52
0.75
30
0
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
1
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-1
**
50
1
3b. Category 2 Disposition
**
1
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-2
**
44
2
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
1
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-3
**
643
19
3d. Category 4 Disposition
**
9
**
2
**
0
-19
**
0
-49
1.27
39
0
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
0
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-0
**
11
0
4. Out of Home Placement
-2
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-2
**
3
0
5. Termination of Parental Rights
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
2
0
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
1
0
--
1
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
1
**
0
12
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
-**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
-**
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
19
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Arenac County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
2,836
48
83
18
0
67
0
216
403
3
**
7
0.59
0
**
0
-3
**
0
-13
0.42
27
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
27
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
33
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
261
3
**
7
**
0
-0
-3
**
0
-13
**
27
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
14
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-7
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
8
Yes
0
0
---
3
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
20
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Baraga County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
1,253
23
38
11
0
405
0
477
186
5
**
2
**
0
**
0
-31
0.52
0
-38
0.54
13
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
6
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-4
**
0
-4
**
3
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-1
**
150
5
**
1
**
0
-0
-20
0.80
0
-26
0.85
14
0
**
1
**
0
-0
-2
**
0
-3
**
5
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-3
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-3
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
-0
-1
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
2
1
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
1
--
0
3
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
4
---
0
0
---
0
4
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
21
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Barry County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
13,035 231
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
598
80
0
99
0
1,008
1,496
28
2. Assignment
1.06
25
0.36
1
**
2
-2
**
0
-58
0.50
43
3
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
3
**
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
-6
3.60
76
3
3b. Category 2 Disposition
**
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
-3
**
46
0
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
-0
**
1,221
20
3d. Category 4 Disposition
**
17
**
1
**
2
**
2
**
0
-42
0.89
26
1
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
-1
**
27
0
4. Out of Home Placement
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
16
0
5. Termination of Parental Rights
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
21
0
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
-1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
0
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
-1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
5
0
--
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
**
0
23
Yes
0
0
---
0
4
-**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
4
-**
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
22
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Bay County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
20,013 971
2,019
173
0
139
0
3,302
2,975
226 1.57 154 0.51
0
**
2
-8
0.39
0
-390 0.79
88
7
1.05
2
**
0
-0
**
0
**
0
-9
0.78
126
18
1.88
3
**
0
-0
**
1
**
0
-22
1.33
125
17
1.79
4
**
0
-0
**
0
**
0
-21
1.28
2,231
143 0.84 107 0.93
0
-2
**
4
**
0
-256 0.88
267
13
0.64
22
1.59
0
-0
**
2
**
0
-37
1.06
44
4
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-6
**
12
3
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
3
1
**
3
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-4
**
3
0
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
1
1
**
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
1
**
2
19
Yes
0
4
**
**
0
2
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
6
**
**
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
23
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Benzie County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
3,258
81
128
14
0
59
0
282
420
11
1.05
5
**
0
**
0
-5
**
0
-21
0.58
6
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
19
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
22
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
296
7
**
4
**
0
-0
-5
**
0
-16
**
49
3
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-3
**
1
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
1
6
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
24
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Berrien County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
24,175 8,218
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2,841
705
0
271
0
12,035
2,737 1,368 1.47 132 0.41
2. Assignment
0
**
0
-24
0.78
0
-1,524 1.12
133
47
3a. Category 1 Disposition
0.71
2
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-49
0.66
98
56
3b. Category 2 Disposition
1.14
6
1.27
0
-0
-0
**
0
-62
1.14
256
134
3c. Category 3 Disposition
1.05
10
0.81
1
-0
-5
**
0
-150
1.05
2,007
935 0.93 105 1.08
3d. Category 4 Disposition
0
-0
-28
**
0
-1,068 0.96
85
66
3e. Category 5 Disposition
1.55
1
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-67
1.42
69
38
4. Out of Home Placement
1.56
7
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-45
1.77
26
26
5. Termination of Parental Rights
1.82
1
**
0
-0
-1
-0
-0
**
42
34
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
1.47
3
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-37
1.35
8
13
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
2.95
1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-14
2.68
0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
15
3
**
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
3
**
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
4
53
Yes
2
33
**
1.13
0
3
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
1
---
0
0
---
0
37
**
1.07
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
25
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Branch County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
9,460
230
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
784
84
0
64
0
1,162
1,554
14
2. Assignment
0.37
51
0.40
0
**
0
-9
0.86
0
-74
0.39
81
1
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
6
2.26
0
-0
-0
**
0
-7
1.81
141
1
3b. Category 2 Disposition
**
9
1.94
0
-0
-0
**
0
-10
1.49
113
1
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
4
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-5
**
1,051
10
3d. Category 4 Disposition
**
26
0.75
0
-0
-8
**
0
-44
0.88
12
0
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
24
1
4. Out of Home Placement
**
3
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-4
**
18
0
5. Termination of Parental Rights
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
21
0
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
3
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
1
20
Yes
0
0
**
**
0
5
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
5
**
**
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
26
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Calhoun County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
23,660 5,263
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2,563
672
0
239
0
8,737
3,393 1,014 1.34 132 0.36
2. Assignment
17
0.18
7
-5
**
0
-1,175 0.94
101
62
3a. Category 1 Disposition
2.05
9
2.29
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
-71
2.03
197
60
3b. Category 2 Disposition
1.02
8
1.04
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
-68
1.00
157
50
3c. Category 3 Disposition
1.07
4
**
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
-54
0.99
2,626
755
3d. Category 4 Disposition
0.96
91
0.89
16
**
7
**
4
**
0
-873 0.96
26
15
3e. Category 5 Disposition
1.93
3
**
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
-18
2.00
55
54
4. Out of Home Placement
1.60
9
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-63
1.63
30
21
5. Termination of Parental Rights
0.71
3
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
28
11
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
0.40
4
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-15
0.47
6
7
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
1.19
1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-8
1.16
0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
5
1
**
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
1
0
40
Yes
0
37
-0.94
0
4
-**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
41
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
**
-0.89
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
27
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Cass County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
9,888 1,068
725
124
0
191
0
2,108
1,068
117
1.01
37
0.47
3
**
0
-41
1.99
0
-198 0.87
77
6
0.71
1
**
0
**
0
-2
**
0
-9
0.63
45
2
**
1
**
0
**
0
-2
**
0
-5
**
70
12
1.56
0
**
1
**
0
-8
2.98
0
-21
1.62
700
80
1.04
26
1.07
1
**
0
-26
0.97
0
-133 1.02
73
2
**
3
**
0
**
0
-3
**
0
-8
0.59
42
6
**
4
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-11
**
14
2
-3
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
19
2
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-4
**
2
1
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-1
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
8
0
**
0
**
0
--
0
--
1
**
0
--
1
**
3
22
Yes
0
2
**
**
0
0
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
**
**
0
0
---
0
2
**
**
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
28
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Charlevoix County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
5,110
111
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
167
46
0
120
0
444
653
13
2. Assignment
0.92
7
0.33
0
**
3
-15
0.98
0
-38
0.67
24
0
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
**
1
**
0
-1
**
27
1
3b. Category 2 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
**
2
**
0
-3
**
39
0
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
**
0
-0
**
468
9
3d. Category 4 Disposition
**
7
**
0
-2
**
9
**
0
-27
0.99
12
0
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
**
2
**
0
-2
**
6
0
4. Out of Home Placement
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
4
2
5. Termination of Parental Rights
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-3
0
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
-0
-0
-0
-1
-0
-1
-0
1
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-1
-0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
1
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
17
Yes
0
2
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
1
0
---
0
0
---
0
2
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
29
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Cheboygan County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
4,614
105
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
94
41
0
272
0
512
909
18
2. Assignment
0.87
12
0.65
0
**
1
-41
0.77
0
-72
0.71
63
0
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
**
3
**
0
-3
**
51
1
3b. Category 2 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
**
0
-1
**
42
0
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
**
4
**
0
-4
**
708
12
3d. Category 4 Disposition
**
9
**
0
-1
**
30
0.94
0
-52
0.93
48
0
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
4
**
0
-0
**
4
**
0
-8
2.10
18
0
4. Out of Home Placement
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
9
0
5. Termination of Parental Rights
-1
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-10
0
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
-4
-0
-0
-1
-0
-5
-1
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
1
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
1
--
0
--
1
--
0
15
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
30
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Chippewa County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
4,961
203
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
214
125
0
2,214
0
2,756
769
15
2. Assignment
0.48
17
0.51
0
**
0
-476 1.39
0
-508 1.19
23
1
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-33
2.32
0
-34
2.24
48
1
3b. Category 2 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-22
0.74
0
-23
0.73
59
3
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-20
0.55
0
-23
0.59
503
2
3d. Category 4 Disposition
**
12
**
0
-0
-301 0.97
0
-315 0.95
40
5
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
3
**
0
-0
-47
1.90
0
-55
2.08
10
1
4. Out of Home Placement
**
0
-0
-0
-24
**
0
-25
**
0
0
5. Termination of Parental Rights
-0
-0
-0
-9
**
0
-0
-3
0
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
**
0
-0
-0
-10
**
0
-10
**
0
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
0
-1
**
0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
5
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
3
**
0
--
3
**
0
3
Yes
0
0
-**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
10
-**
0
0
---
0
10
-**
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
31
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Clare County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
5,987
145
199
31
0
71
0
446
994
15
0.62
30
0.91
0
**
0
-2
**
0
-47
0.63
29
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
35
6
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-6
3.63
46
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
659
6
**
18
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-25
0.80
164
3
**
7
**
0
-0
-6
**
0
-16
2.06
9
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-9
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-8
0
-1
-0
-0
-0
-0
-1
-2
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
2
17
Yes
0
0
---
0
5
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
5
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
32
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Clinton County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
16,078 658
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
1,116
275
0
100
0
2,149
873
67
2. Assignment
1.88
82
1.35
1
**
0
-2
**
0
-152 1.30
34
0
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
16
5.01
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-16
2.70
33
2
3b. Category 2 Disposition
**
4
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-6
1.04
40
3
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
1
**
1
**
0
-0
**
0
-5
**
647
53
3d. Category 4 Disposition
1.07
50
0.82
0
**
0
-2
**
0
-105 0.93
36
4
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
0
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-4
**
17
0
4. Out of Home Placement
-7
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-7
**
15
1
5. Termination of Parental Rights
-4
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
11
2
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-2
**
2
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
1
0
--
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
**
2
13
Yes
0
0
---
0
1
**
**
0
1
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
2
**
**
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
33
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Crawford County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
2,567
60
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
86
28
0
15
0
189
468
4
2. Assignment
**
4
**
0
**
0
-3
**
0
-11
0.32
24
0
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
11
0
3b. Category 2 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
31
1
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-1
**
338
2
3d. Category 4 Disposition
**
3
**
0
-0
-5
**
0
-10
**
29
1
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-2
**
12
0
4. Out of Home Placement
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-9
2
5. Termination of Parental Rights
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-13
2
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-2
-1
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
-1
-0
-0
-0
-0
-1
-0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
1
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
1
10
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
34
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Delta County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
6,975
109
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
135
57
0
354
0
655
914
5
2. Assignment
**
8
0.45
0
**
0
-63
1.36
0
-76
0.89
20
1
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-3
**
0
-4
**
19
0
3b. Category 2 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-3
**
0
-3
**
51
1
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-5
**
0
-6
1.41
594
2
3d. Category 4 Disposition
**
6
**
0
-0
-36
0.88
0
-44
0.89
148
1
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-11
1.08
0
-12
0.98
11
0
4. Out of Home Placement
**
0
-0
-0
-1
**
0
-1
**
7
0
5. Termination of Parental Rights
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
0
-0
**
13
0
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
1
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
1
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
**
0
--
0
**
0
5
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
2
-**
0
0
---
0
2
-**
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
35
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Dickinson County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
5,082
90
148
33
0
58
0
329
537
13
1.37
7
0.45
1
**
0
-9
1.47
0
-30
0.86
47
1
**
1
**
0
**
-2
**
0
-0
**
18
0
**
0
**
0
**
-2
**
0
-0
**
28
2
**
0
**
1
**
-0
**
0
-0
**
338
6
**
5
**
0
**
-0
**
0
-0
**
94
1
**
0
**
0
**
-0
**
0
-0
**
29
1
**
1
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-3
-11
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
16
1
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-1
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
5
Yes
0
0
-**
0
2
-**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
1
-**
0
0
---
0
3
-**
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
36
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Eaton County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
19,650 2,324
1,903
570
0
143
0
4,940
2,226
236
0.90 135 0.63
17
0.26
0
-7
0.43
0
-395 0.71
58
4
**
15
4.26
0
**
0
-1
**
0
-20
1.94
106
14
1.25
5
**
0
**
0
-1
**
0
-20
1.06
117
18
1.45
11
1.55
2
**
0
-0
**
0
-31
1.49
1,715
182
1.00
86
0.83
7
**
0
-6
**
0
-281 0.92
84
6
0.67
2
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-8
0.54
21
2
**
6
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-9
**
23
6
**
5
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
23
6
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-7
-1
2
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-3
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
2
1
**
1
**
0
--
0
--
0
**
0
--
2
**
2
41
Yes
0
5
**
**
1
11
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
**
**
0
0
---
0
16
**
**
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
37
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Emmet County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
6,440
158
204
67
0
371
0
800
789
16
0.83
3
**
2
**
0
-69
1.52
0
-90
0.92
25
0
**
1
**
0
**
0
-11
5.03
0
-12
4.21
48
6
**
0
**
0
**
0
-8
1.91
0
-14
2.56
35
2
**
0
**
0
**
0
-2
**
0
-4
**
582
10
**
0
**
2
**
0
-24
0.47
0
-36
0.54
3
0
**
3
**
0
**
0
-10
**
0
-13
**
11
0
-0
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-1
**
18
0
-1
-0
-0
-5
**
0
-0
**
9
1
-0
-0
-0
-3
-0
-4
**
2
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
0
-1
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
9
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
-**
0
0
---
0
0
-**
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
38
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Genesee County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
Value
68,502
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
8,995
2. Assignment
275
3a. Category 1 Disposition
644
3b. Category 2 Disposition
504
3c. Category 3 Disposition
6,716
3d. Category 4 Disposition
225
3e. Category 5 Disposition
120
4. Out of Home Placement
64
5. Termination of Parental Rights
65
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
50
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
1
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Value
28,188
5,822
200
332
366
4,137
145
82
39
61
47
0
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
1.57
1.12
0.80
1.12
0.95
1.00
0.94
0.89
1.37
1.38
**
5,086
1,208
289 0.43
26
0.16
10
1.13
2
**
17
0.82
0
**
32
1.98
0
**
178 0.82
4
**
10
1.38
0
**
9
**
5
**
2
**
0
**
4
**
0
**
1
**
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
-**
**
**
**
**
------
745
15
1
4
0
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0.15
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
------------
35,227
6,154
213
353
399
4,324
155
97
41
65
48
0
1.33
1.13
0.80
1.16
0.94
1.01
1.04
0.79
1.24
1.19
**
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
31
17
0.80
3
**
0
**
0
--
0
**
0
--
20
0.80
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
1
128
Yes
3
122
**
1.39
Yes
0
3
**
**
0
1
**
**
0
0
---
0
1
**
**
0
0
---
0
127
**
1.23
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
39
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Gladwin County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
4,858
87
108
22
0
33
0
250
815
8
0.55
12
0.66
0
**
0
-1
**
0
-21
0.50
27
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
41
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
71
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
539
7
**
10
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-17
**
17
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
13
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-5
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-2
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-1
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
9
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
40
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Gogebic County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
2,429
50
53
5
0
132
0
240
376
3
**
0
**
0
**
0
-13
0.64
0
-16
0.43
19
0
**
0
-0
-0
-1
**
0
-1
**
12
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
12
0
**
0
-0
-0
-1
**
0
-1
**
280
2
**
0
-0
-0
-10
**
0
-12
**
22
1
**
0
-0
-0
-1
**
0
-2
**
6
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
0
-1
**
3
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-3
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
2
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
**
0
--
0
**
0
7
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
41
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Grand Traverse County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
17,324 442
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
793
275
0
327
0
1,837
1,779
54
2. Assignment
1.19
97
1.19
4
**
4
-94
2.80
0
-253 1.34
45
0
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
1
**
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
-1
**
124
4
3b. Category 2 Disposition
**
5
**
0
**
0
**
3
**
0
-12
0.68
110
4
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
6
1.00
0
**
0
**
5
**
0
-15
0.96
1,275
38
3d. Category 4 Disposition
0.98
63
0.91
3
**
4
**
70
1.04
0
-178 0.98
100
1
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
12
2.20
0
**
0
**
8
1.51
0
-21
1.48
16
0
4. Out of Home Placement
-1
**
0
-0
-1
-0
-2
**
23
1
5. Termination of Parental Rights
-0
**
0
-0
-4
**
0
-0
**
28
1
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
-0
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-2
**
3
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
-1
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-1
**
0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
1
**
0
--
1
**
2
20
Yes
0
0
---
0
2
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
1
**
**
0
0
---
0
3
**
**
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
42
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Gratiot County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
7,759
197
885
42
0
50
0
1,174
957
7
0.29 110 1.01
0
**
0
-2
**
0
-119 0.82
24
2
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-4
**
47
0
**
5
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-5
**
43
1
**
5
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-6
1.12
657
2
**
60
0.79
0
-0
-1
**
0
-63
0.77
93
0
**
12
1.12
0
-0
-0
**
0
-12
1.04
16
2
**
9
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-11
**
5
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
9
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
2
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
2
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
5
0
**
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
**
0
11
Yes
0
0
-**
0
0
-**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
-**
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
43
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Hillsdale County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
10,150 203
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
371
69
0
66
0
709
2,031
60
2. Assignment
1.48
27
0.36
1
**
0
-3
**
0
-91
0.64
77
4
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
2
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-6
1.74
138
6
3b. Category 2 Disposition
1.47
2
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-8
1.29
108
2
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
4
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-6
1.24
1,450
50
3d. Category 4 Disposition
1.17
15
**
1
**
0
-3
**
0
-69
1.06
51
3
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
3
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-6
2.63
24
0
4. Out of Home Placement
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-2
**
16
0
5. Termination of Parental Rights
-1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
12
0
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
-1
-0
-0
-0
-0
-1
-1
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
1
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
1
**
0
25
Yes
0
0
---
0
1
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
1
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
44
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Houghton County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
7,019
90
114
140
0
63
0
407
2,031
60
2.30
27
0.82
1
**
0
-3
**
0
-91
0.77
20
2
**
2
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-4
**
28
2
**
2
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-4
**
44
1
**
4
**
0
**
0
-6
**
0
-11
5.58
389
11
0.96
15
**
1
**
1
-9
**
0
-37
2.12
26
0
**
3
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-3
**
24
0
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-2
**
2
0
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
6
0
-1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
2
0
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
2
2
Yes
0
0
---
0
1
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
1
**
**
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
45
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Huron County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
6,149
103
252
67
0
31
0
453
688
11
0.95
7
0.25
2
**
0
-2
**
0
-22
0.43
11
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-0
**
33
1
**
0
**
1
**
0
-0
**
0
-2
**
31
0
**
2
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-2
**
519
10
**
5
**
0
**
0
-2
**
0
-17
**
108
1
**
0
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-1
**
4
0
-1
-0
-0
-0
-0
-1
-8
0
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
7
0
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
1
0
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
3
0
--
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
**
0
7
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
-**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
-**
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
46
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Ingham County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
Value
35,281
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
4,790
2. Assignment
248
3a. Category 1 Disposition
331
3b. Category 2 Disposition
399
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3,135
3d. Category 4 Disposition
166
3e. Category 5 Disposition
108
4. Out of Home Placement
53
5. Termination of Parental Rights
46
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
10
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Value
11,076
2,903
234
204
228
1,731
110
123
43
36
10
0
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
1.93
1.56
1.02
0.94
0.91
1.09
1.21
0.71
0.69
0.88
--
7,075
3,154
803 0.84
67
0.16
27
0.65
1
**
65
1.17
7
1.51
66
0.99
8
1.43
524 1.00
33
0.75
19
0.68
4
**
24
**
1
**
8
**
0
**
10
**
0
**
1
**
0
**
0
-0
--
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-**
**
**
**
**
------
360
18
2
0
0
13
1
0
0
0
1
0
0.37
**
**
**
**
**
**
-----
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
------------
21,665
3,792
264
276
303
2,301
134
148
0
46
12
0
1.29
1.34
1.05
0.96
0.93
1.02
1.29
**
0.73
0.88
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
11
6
0.48
3
**
1
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
10
0.66
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
1
91
Yes
8
87
**
0.84
Yes
0
24
**
**
0
0
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
111
**
0.89
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
47
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Ionia County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
13,885 283
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
1,105
80
0
80
0
1,548
2,370
39
2. Assignment
0.81
95
0.50
3
**
0
-0
**
0
-137 0.52
73
2
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
2
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-4
**
131
3
3b. Category 2 Disposition
**
3
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-6
0.79
143
3
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
4
**
0
**
0
-1
-0
-8
0.97
1,827
25
3d. Category 4 Disposition
0.83
78
1.07
3
**
0
-0
-0
-106 1.00
29
0
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
**
28
4
4. Out of Home Placement
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-6
**
10
0
5. Termination of Parental Rights
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
15
0
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-2
**
0
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
-1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
4
0
**
1
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
1
**
3
28
Yes
0
0
**
**
0
2
**
--
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
2
**
**
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
48
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Iosco County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
3,994
130
180
51
0
50
0
411
672
21
0.96
19
0.63
0
**
0
-25
2.97
0
-65
0.94
27
0
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-2
**
47
1
**
2
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-4
**
45
3
**
1
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-5
**
424
12
**
8
**
0
-0
-20
**
0
-40
0.98
53
1
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-2
**
10
0
-1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
3
0
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
3
0
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
1
0
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
2
0
--
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
**
0
5
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
-**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
-**
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
49
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Iron County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
1,880
32
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
86
5
0
28
0
151
279
5
2. Assignment
**
2
**
0
**
0
-22
**
0
-29
1.29
12
1
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-1
**
13
0
3b. Category 2 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
10
0
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-2
**
0
-2
**
220
4
3d. Category 4 Disposition
**
2
**
0
-0
-19
**
0
-25
**
13
0
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
2
0
4. Out of Home Placement
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
0
5. Termination of Parental Rights
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
1
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
1
---
0
0
---
0
1
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
50
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Isabella County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
10,067 586
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
760
237
0
740
0
2,323
1,123
67
2. Assignment
1.02
36
0.42
9
0.34
1
-124 1.50
0
-237 0.91
48
3
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
4
**
0
**
0
**
15
2.83
0
-22
2.17
56
6
3b. Category 2 Disposition
1.80
4
**
0
**
0
**
4
**
0
-14
1.18
89
4
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
5
**
0
**
0
**
8
0.81
0
-17
0.91
827
47
3d. Category 4 Disposition
0.95
30
1.13
5
**
0
**
54
0.59
0
-136 0.78
147
3
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
4
**
1
**
0
**
27
1.66
0
-35
1.13
21
3
4. Out of Home Placement
**
4
**
0
-0
-7
**
0
-14
**
21
2
5. Termination of Parental Rights
**
4
-0
-0
-1
**
0
-0
**
25
0
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-1
**
2
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
**
0
**
0
-0
-2
**
0
-2
**
0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
5
17
Yes
0
0
**
**
0
5
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
**
**
0
0
---
0
5
**
**
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
51
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Jackson County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
29,742 4,123
1,919
424
0
180
0
6,646
4,620 1,063 1.66 170 0.57
4
**
2
-9
0.32
0
-1,248 1.21
182
25
0.60
1
**
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
-26
0.53
242
46
0.83
18
2.02
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
-64
0.98
304
62
0.89
8
0.72
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
-70
0.85
3,408
787
1.00 136 1.08
4
**
1
**
9
**
0
-937 1.02
67
9
0.58
1
**
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
-10
0.55
72
21
**
7
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-28
**
22
2
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
26
8
**
4
**
0
-1
-0
-0
-13
**
13
6
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-8
**
1
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
2
0
**
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
**
8
98
Yes
1
14
**
**
0
8
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
22
**
**
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
52
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Kalamazoo County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Value
40,172
5,582
360
379
379
3,514
451
140
73
54
13
1
Value
10,128
3,675
274
217
264
2,162
317
78
42
31
11
0
Guardianship
14
8
1.03
0
**
0
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
99
Yes
2
36
**
0.65
Yes
0
3
-**
0
0
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
2.61
1.16
0.87
1.06
0.93
1.07
0.73
1.03
1.03
1.52
**
3,791
1,501
353 0.67
17
0.08
21
0.92
0
**
31
1.29
0
**
31
1.29
1
**
226 1.02
13
**
28
0.98
0
**
15
**
4
-6
**
0
**
4
**
0
**
1
**
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
3
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
-**
**
**
**
**
------
315
16
1
3
0
12
0
1
0
0
0
0
0.37
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
------------
15,735
4,064
296
251
296
2,416
345
98
0
35
12
0
1.86
1.13
0.91
1.07
0.94
1.05
0.85
**
0.93
1.32
**
**
0
--
0
**
0
--
8
0.82
-**
0
0
---
0
0
-**
0
0
---
0
39
-0.56
Yes
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
53
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Kalkaska County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
3,590
102
91
17
0
47
0
257
597
28
1.65
11
0.73
0
**
0
-1
**
0
-40
0.94
19
1
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-1
**
34
0
**
3
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-3
**
24
4
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-4
**
440
23
**
5
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-29
0.98
63
1
**
3
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-4
**
11
0
**
1
-0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
15
0
-4
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
10
0
-1
**
0
-0
-2
-0
-3
**
1
0
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
1
0
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
9
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
-**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
-**
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
54
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Kent County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
Value
104,716
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
9,681
2. Assignment
278
3a. Category 1 Disposition
668
3b. Category 2 Disposition
587
3c. Category 3 Disposition
7,002
3d. Category 4 Disposition
153
3e. Category 5 Disposition
120
4. Out of Home Placement
81
5. Termination of Parental Rights
78
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
27
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Value
22,476
5,030
184
341
318
3,505
102
92
69
78
22
0
Hispanic or
Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
2.42
1.27
0.98
1.04
0.96
1.28
1.16
1.11
1.30
1.06
--
25,194
2,319
64
148
158
1,638
33
46
29
24
17
1
1.00
0.96
0.92
1.12
0.98
0.90
1.67
0.93
0.80
1.64
**
**
4,714
132 0.30
4
**
8
0.88
5
**
103 1.08
1
**
5
**
1
**
0
**
1
**
0
--
0
9
1
0
0
8
0
0
0
1
0
0
-**
**
**
**
**
**
-----
686
58
5
2
0
36
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.91
**
**
**
0.86
**
**
-----
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
------------
53,070
7,548
258
499
481
5,290
136
143
0
103
40
1
1.54
1.19
0.96
1.05
0.97
1.14
1.28
**
1.11
1.24
**
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
9
3
**
4
1
99
Yes
4
78
**
1.03
2
23
Yes
**
0.61
Yes
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
7
0.65
0
2
**
**
0
1
---
0
1
---
0
0
---
0
105
**
0.89
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
55
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Keweenaw County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
Asian
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
395
6
4
0
0
0
0
10
30
4
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-4
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-5
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
3
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
23
3
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-3
**
0
1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
1
Yes
0
0
-**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
-**
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
56
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Lake County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
Asian
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
All
Other
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
1,607
303
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
107
4
0
13
0
427
489
78
2. Assignment
0.85
12
0.37
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-90
0.69
27
5
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-6
1.21
42
7
3b. Category 2 Disposition
1.04
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-7
0.91
50
7
3c. Category 3 Disposition
0.88
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-7
0.76
279
39
3d. Category 4 Disposition
0.88
11
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-50
0.97
67
8
3e. Category 5 Disposition
0.75
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-8
0.65
6
3
4. Out of Home Placement
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-3
**
3
1
5. Termination of Parental Rights
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
5
0
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
1
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
1
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
**
2
9
Yes
0
2
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
2
**
**
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
57
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Lapeer County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
18,683 340
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
1,477
158
0
117
0
2,092
1,659
33
2. Assignment
1.09
66
0.50
1
**
0
-0
**
0
-100 0.54
57
2
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
1
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-3
**
57
3
3b. Category 2 Disposition
**
3
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-6
1.75
153
0
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
3
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-3
**
1,160
24
3d. Category 4 Disposition
1.04
47
1.02
0
**
0
-0
-0
-71
1.02
91
0
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
7
1.93
1
**
0
-0
-0
-8
1.46
23
0
4. Out of Home Placement
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
16
0
5. Termination of Parental Rights
-2
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-14
0
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
1
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
9
Yes
0
0
---
0
6
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
6
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
58
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Leelanau County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
3,259
75
374
35
0
227
0
711
188
1
**
18
0.83
0
**
0
-10
0.76
0
-29
0.71
3
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
4
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-2
**
0
-2
**
10
0
**
1
**
0
-0
-3
**
0
-4
**
138
0
**
12
**
0
-0
-9
**
0
-21
**
10
0
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-1
**
3
0
-2
-0
-0
-1
-0
-3
-1
0
-0
**
0
-0
-5
**
0
-0
**
1
0
-0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
3
**
0
--
3
**
0
1
Yes
0
0
---
0
3
-**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
2
-**
0
0
---
0
5
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
59
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Lenawee County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value
18,691 795
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2,818
207
0
105
0
3,925
1,822
100 1.29 250 0.91
2. Assignment
2
**
0
-3
**
0
-355
49
3
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
9
1.34
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-12
141
3
3b. Category 2 Disposition
**
32
1.65
0
**
0
-1
**
0
-36
94
3
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
9
0.70
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-12
1,246
71
3d. Category 4 Disposition
1.04 164 0.96
2
**
0
-1
**
0
-238
64
4
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
3
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-7
23
0
4. Out of Home Placement
**
3
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-3
13
2
5. Termination of Parental Rights
-2
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
6
2
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
-1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-3
2
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
RRI
0.93
1.26
1.31
0.66
0.98
0.56
**
**
**
**
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
3
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
3
**
0
27
Yes
3
0
---
0
2
-**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
2
-**
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
60
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Livingston County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
42,234 585
1,428
552
0
240
0
2,805
2,106
56
1.92
45
0.63
5
**
0
-1
**
0
-107 0.76
75
4
**
0
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-4
**
70
0
**
1
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-1
**
197
2
**
1
**
3
**
0
-0
**
0
-6
0.60
1,511
42
1.05
32
0.99
1
**
0
-1
**
0
-76
0.99
129
4
**
5
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-9
1.37
28
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
36
0
-1
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-32
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-12
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
4
0
--
1
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
1
--
0
21
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
1
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
1
---
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
61
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Luce County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
979
36
26
4
0
102
0
168
219
3
**
2
**
0
**
0
-43
1.88
0
-48
1.28
8
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
10
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-1
**
14
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-1
**
134
3
**
2
**
0
-0
-32
1.22
0
-37
1.26
28
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-1
**
3
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
3
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
1
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
1
---
0
0
---
0
1
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
62
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Mackinac County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
1,268
62
69
3
0
620
0
754
134
12
1.83
1
**
0
**
0
-79
1.21
0
-92
1.15
21
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-13
1.05
0
-13
0.90
12
1
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-1
**
3
3
**
0
**
0
-0
-6
**
0
-9
**
86
9
**
1
**
0
-0
-56
1.10
0
-66
1.12
14
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-6
0.73
0
-6
0.62
2
0
-0
-0
-0
-2
**
0
-2
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-7
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
0
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
63
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Macomb County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
Value
148,111
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
8,605
2. Assignment
246
3a. Category 1 Disposition
424
3b. Category 2 Disposition
468
3c. Category 3 Disposition
6,282
3d. Category 4 Disposition
448
3e. Category 5 Disposition
130
4. Out of Home Placement
78
5. Termination of Parental Rights
125
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
30
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Value
26,189
2,982
80
162
174
2,086
202
29
35
46
18
0
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
1.96
0.94
1.10
1.07
0.96
1.30
0.69
**
**
**
--
7,384
8,141
173 0.40
67
0.14
9
1.82
0
**
4
**
0
**
11
1.17
7
1.92
118 0.93
59
1.21
12
1.33
5
**
10
**
0
-1
**
0
-12
**
0
-1
**
0
-0
-0
--
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
------------
913
13
0
0
2
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.25
**
**
**
**
**
------
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
------------
42,627
3,235
89
166
194
2,279
219
39
0
58
19
0
1.31
0.96
1.04
1.10
0.96
1.30
0.83
**
1.55
2.11
-**
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
5
6
**
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
6
6
125
Yes
1
50
**
**
0
10
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
60
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
**
1.60
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
64
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Manistee County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
4,057
115
268
39
0
131
0
553
524
7
0.47
31
0.90
0
**
0
-23
1.36
0
-61
0.85
11
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
20
1
**
5
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-6
2.58
43
0
**
4
**
0
-0
-3
**
0
-7
1.40
398
5
**
21
0.89
0
-0
-21
**
0
-47
1.01
19
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-1
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6
0
-2
-0
-0
-0
-0
-2
-0
0
-1
-0
-0
-0
-0
-1
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
0
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
65
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Marquette County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value
11,349 274
275
108
0
385
0
1,042
1,068
27
1.05
25
0.97
0
**
0
-31
0.86
0
-83
68
4
**
1
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-6
57
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-1
60
2
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-2
541
15
**
16
**
0
-0
-16
1.02
0
-47
239
4
**
5
**
0
-0
-12
1.73
0
-21
38
3
**
1
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-5
34
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-0
32
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-2
**
0
-2
3
1
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-1
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
RRI
0.85
1.14
**
**
1.12
1.13
**
**
**
**
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
2
0
**
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
**
0
--
0
**
3
22
Yes
0
2
**
**
0
1
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
1
**
**
0
0
---
0
4
**
**
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
66
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Mason County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
5,291
141
496
57
0
75
0
769
776
34
1.64
63
0.87
0
**
0
-2
**
0
-99
0.88
34
0
**
3
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-3
**
42
3
**
3
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-6
1.12
69
6
1.98
3
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-9
1.02
624
21
0.77
59
1.16
0
-0
-3
**
0
-83
1.04
5
0
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-1
**
18
0
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
7
2
-5
-0
-0
-1
-0
-0
-2
0
-1
-0
-0
-1
-0
-2
-2
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
2
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
6
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
67
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Mecosta County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
7,602
434
266
63
0
87
0
850
1,352
80
1.04
32
0.68
2
**
0
-6
0.39
0
-120 0.79
55
8
2.46
1
**
0
**
0
-2
**
0
-11
2.25
119
10
1.42
4
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-14
1.33
109
1
**
3
**
0
**
0
-1
**
0
-5
**
832
40
0.81
19
0.96
2
**
2
-2
**
0
-65
0.88
136
7
0.87
5
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-12
0.99
19
6
**
0
**
0
-0
-3
**
0
-9
**
9
1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
6
0
**
1
-0
-0
-0
**
0
-1
**
4
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
4
2
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
1
**
0
--
3
**
2
22
Yes
0
3
**
--
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
**
--
0
0
---
0
3
**
**
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
68
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Menominee County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
4,416
88
127
22
0
249
0
486
448
2
**
7
0.54
0
**
0
-15
0.59
0
-24
0.49
14
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
11
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-2
**
0
-2
**
37
0
**
1
**
0
-0
-5
**
0
-6
**
238
0
**
5
**
0
-0
-6
**
0
-11
**
98
2
**
1
**
0
-0
-2
**
0
-5
**
4
0
-0
-0
-0
-12
-0
-12
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-6
**
0
-6
**
1
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
1
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
1
**
0
--
1
**
1
4
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
2
15
**
**
0
0
---
0
15
**
**
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
69
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Midland County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
17,619 493
652
513
0
111
0
1,769
1,895
104 1.96
33
0.47
14
0.25
4
-3
**
0
-158 0.83
43
9
3.81
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
-9
2.51
79
3
**
2
**
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
-5
**
82
3
**
1
**
0
**
1
**
0
**
0
-5
**
1,362
57
0.76
33
1.39
12
**
0
**
1
**
0
-103 0.91
52
8
2.80
0
**
0
**
2
**
0
**
0
-10
2.31
17
3
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-3
**
17
4
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
16
1
**
1
-0
-0
-0
-0
-2
**
5
0
**
1
-0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
1
23
Yes
1
2
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
2
**
**
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
70
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Missaukee County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
3,306
71
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
129
23
0
23
0
246
235
3
2. Assignment
**
12
1.31
0
**
0
-2
**
0
-17
0.97
7
0
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
26
0
3b. Category 2 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
27
0
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-1
**
118
1
3d. Category 4 Disposition
**
11
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-13
**
16
2
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-2
**
0
0
4. Out of Home Placement
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
5. Termination of Parental Rights
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
0
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
71
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Monroe County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
32,066 1,544
1,811
330
0
114
0
3,799
2,535
274 2.24
64
0.45
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-338 1.13
97
9
0.86
2
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-11
0.85
126
18
1.32
5
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-23
1.37
205
27
1.22
7
1.35
0
-0
-0
-0
-34
1.24
1,620
164
0.94
29
0.71
0
-0
-0
-0
-193 0.89
236
3
**
8
1.34
0
-0
-0
-0
-11
0.35
38
11
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-13
**
35
0
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
23
3
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-5
**
6
6
**
6
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-12
**
1
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
5
2
**
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
2
**
4
14
Yes
0
3
**
**
0
0
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
3
**
**
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
72
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Montcalm County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
13,563 299
877
91
0
90
0
1,357
2,698
55
0.92 109 0.62
0
**
0
-6
0.34
0
-170 0.63
99
3
**
3
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-7
1.12
165
1
**
9
1.35
0
-0
-2
**
0
-12
1.15
105
0
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-1
**
2,031
30
0.72
79
0.96
0
-0
-3
**
0
-112 0.88
135
5
**
3
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-8
0.94
46
0
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-1
**
32
1
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
18
1
-0
**
0
-0
-1
-0
-2
**
5
0
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
2
0
--
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
**
4
31
Yes
1
2
---
0
0
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
2
**
**
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
73
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Montmorency County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
1,505
31
37
6
0
5
0
79
147
4
**
2
**
0
**
0
-1
**
0
-7
0.91
12
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
5
0
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-1
**
6
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
96
4
**
1
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-6
**
19
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
3
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-1
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
1
7
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
74
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Muskegon County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
29,157 8,292
3,551
392
0
380
0
12,615
3,745 1,263 1.19 189 0.41
7
0.14
3
-19
0.39
0
-1,481 0.91
225
137 1.81
28
2.47
0
**
0
**
2
**
0
-167 1.88
379
65
0.51
15
0.78
0
**
0
**
1
**
0
-81
0.54
164
55
0.99
8
0.97
0
**
0
**
1
**
0
-64
0.99
2,313
719 0.92
98
0.84
3
**
3
**
13
**
0
-836 0.91
271
79
0.86
12
0.88
1
**
0
**
0
**
0
-92
0.86
107
64
0.98
15
**
0
-0
-2
**
0
-81
1.02
66
41
1.04
4
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
62
38
1.02
5
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-43
0.92
13
8
1.03
0
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-9
0.91
1
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
17
14
1.38
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
**
0
--
14
1.09
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
6
125
Yes
0
72
**
0.96
0
7
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
3
**
**
0
0
---
0
82
**
0.87
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
75
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Newaygo County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
10,133 281
1,159
70
0
126
0
1,636
1,901
35
0.66
86
0.40
2
**
0
-5
**
0
-128 0.42
60
5
**
3
**
0
**
0
-1
**
0
-9
2.23
169
0
**
3
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-3
**
74
0
**
4
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-4
**
1,301
28
1.17
52
0.88
2
**
0
-1
**
0
-83
0.95
191
1
**
15
1.74
0
**
0
-2
**
0
-18
1.40
30
0
**
3
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-3
**
19
0
-11
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
17
1
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
5
0
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
3
0
--
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
**
0
17
Yes
0
0
---
0
6
-**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
1
---
0
0
---
0
7
-**
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
76
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Oakland County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
Value
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17) 194,569
9,417
2. Assignment
201
3a. Category 1 Disposition
274
3b. Category 2 Disposition
639
3c. Category 3 Disposition
7,473
3d. Category 4 Disposition
140
3e. Category 5 Disposition
87
4. Out of Home Placement
43
5. Termination of Parental Rights
50
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
17
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Value
45,828
4,866
150
139
322
3,690
103
81
36
64
17
0
Hispanic or
Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
2.19
1.44
0.98
0.98
0.96
1.42
1.25
0.90
1.37
1.07
--
16,173
652
22
26
38
473
6
16
3
10
1
0
20,681
150 0.15
1
**
1
**
20
1.96
108 0.91
3
**
1
**
0
**
3
**
0
**
0
--
0.83
1.58
1.37
0.86
0.91
0.62
**
**
**
**
--
**
1
**
1
0
23
-**
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
6
0
1
0
0
0
0
1,076
18
0.35
0
**
0
**
1
**
13
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
-**
**
**
**
**
-**
**
**
--
**
0
**
0
-**
0
0
-**
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
------------
83,758
5,691
173
166
381
4,290
112
99
0
77
18
0
1.40
1.42
1.00
0.99
0.95
1.32
1.32
**
1.35
0.93
--
--
0
--
13
**
---
0
0
---
0
96
-0.97
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
4
11
0
87
Yes
4
73
**
0.90
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
77
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Oceana County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
4,658
135
1,653
31
0
63
0
1,882
677
16
0.82 152 0.63
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-168 0.61
19
3
**
5
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-8
1.70
46
0
**
8
0.77
0
-0
-0
-0
-8
0.70
78
1
**
17
0.97
0
-0
-0
-0
-18
0.93
483
12
**
73
0.67
0
-0
-0
-0
-85
0.71
13
0
**
8
2.74
0
-0
-0
-0
-8
2.48
8
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
3
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-2
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
2
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
4
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
78
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Ogemaw County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
4,008
49
121
21
0
42
0
233
745
8
0.88
1
**
0
**
0
-3
**
0
-12
0.28
22
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
60
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
44
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-1
**
513
8
**
1
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-10
**
58
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
5
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-7
0
-1
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-5
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-1
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
14
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
79
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Ontonagon County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
929
15
23
6
0
22
0
66
143
2
**
2
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-4
**
4
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
12
1
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
9
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
98
1
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-3
**
3
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
0
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
80
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Osceola County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
5,287
183
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
194
20
0
55
0
452
1,052
32
2. Assignment
0.88
30
0.78
0
**
0
-10
0.91
0
-72
0.80
56
0
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
6
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-7
1.83
114
5
3b. Category 2 Disposition
**
8
**
0
-0
-4
**
0
-17
2.18
121
2
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
4
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-6
0.72
624
23
3d. Category 4 Disposition
1.21
14
**
0
-0
-2
**
0
-39
0.91
95
4
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
0
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-5
**
12
0
4. Out of Home Placement
-0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
6
0
5. Termination of Parental Rights
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6
0
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-1
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
4
2
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
2
--
0
--
4
--
0
14
Yes
0
0
---
0
1
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
1
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
81
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Oscoda County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
1,647
24
23
4
0
8
0
59
249
2
**
7
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-9
1.01
14
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
11
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
8
0
**
3
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-3
**
167
2
**
4
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-6
**
28
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
3
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-2
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-1
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
2
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
2
--
0
5
Yes
0
0
---
0
1
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
1
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
82
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Otsego County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
5,043
109
133
35
0
64
0
341
828
7
0.39
15
0.69
0
**
0
-23
2.19
0
-45
0.80
32
4
**
0
**
0
-0
-2
**
0
-6
3.45
40
1
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-2
**
36
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
634
9
**
14
**
0
-0
-21
**
0
-44
1.28
10
0
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-1
**
8
2
**
1
-0
-0
-0
**
0
-3
**
10
0
-1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
12
1
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
1
0
**
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
**
3
12
Yes
0
1
**
**
0
0
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
1
**
**
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
83
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Ottawa County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
54,107 2,071
9,408
2,320
0
277
0
14,076
3,033
385 3.32 553 1.05
47
0.36
0
-26
1.67
0
-1,011 1.28
115
18
1.23
20
0.95
4
**
0
-0
**
0
-42
1.10
172
25
1.15
38
1.21
3
**
0
-6
**
0
-72
1.26
101
11
0.86
24
1.30
5
**
0
-0
**
0
-40
1.19
2,231
253 0.89 372 0.91
22
0.64
0
-22
**
0
-669 0.90
195
46
1.86
40
1.13
2
**
0
-0
**
0
-88
1.35
42
12
**
14
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
-27
1.76
28
12
**
4
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
**
11
1
**
8
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
-10
**
4
0
**
3
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-3
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
2
1
**
0
**
2
**
0
--
1
--
0
--
4
**
1
47
Yes
0
15
**
**
0
23
**
**
0
0
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
38
**
**
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
84
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Presque Isle County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
2,111
43
35
14
0
29
0
121
283
6
1.04
0
**
0
**
0
-1
**
0
-7
0.43
5
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
14
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
19
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
214
6
**
2
-0
-0
-1
**
0
-9
**
20
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
-0
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-10
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-3
1
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-1
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
2
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
85
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Roscommon County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
3,544
86
83
35
0
42
0
246
880
14
0.66
13
0.63
2
**
0
-6
0.58
0
-35
0.57
29
0
**
1
**
2
**
0
-0
**
0
-3
**
40
1
**
6
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-7
4.40
57
2
**
0
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-2
**
656
3
**
5
**
0
**
0
-6
**
0
-14
0.54
44
2
**
0
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-2
**
3
0
-0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
**
7
0
-2
-0
-0
-2
-0
-0
-2
1
-2
-0
-0
-2
-0
-5
-1
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
1
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
13
Yes
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
86
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Saginaw County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
Value
27,747
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
3,324
2. Assignment
85
3a. Category 1 Disposition
167
3b. Category 2 Disposition
147
3c. Category 3 Disposition
2,581
3d. Category 4 Disposition
107
3e. Category 5 Disposition
30
4. Out of Home Placement
12
5. Termination of Parental Rights
28
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
5
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Value
11,391
2,513
61
95
120
1,887
137
34
20
23
21
1
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
1.84
0.95
0.75
1.08
0.97
1.69
1.58
**
**
**
**
5,815
557 0.80
19
1.33
24
0.86
23
0.93
450 1.04
20
1.12
8
**
8
**
16
**
2
**
0
--
639
8
0
0
1
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.10
**
**
**
**
**
------
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
------------
263
8
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0.25
**
**
**
**
**
------
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
------------
18,108
3,086
80
119
144
2,347
158
42
0
39
23
1
1.42
1.01
0.77
1.06
0.98
1.59
1.49
**
**
**
**
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
6
3
**
1
**
1
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
5
**
4
51
Yes
1
42
**
**
1
13
**
**
0
0
---
1
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
55
**
**
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
87
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Sanilac County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
9,081
138
576
34
0
48
0
796
1,340
6
0.29
73
0.86
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-79
0.67
45
3
**
3
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-6
2.26
50
0
**
6
2.20
0
-0
-0
-0
-6
2.04
75
0
**
4
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-4
**
961
3
**
47
0.90
0
-0
-0
-0
-50
0.88
88
0
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
25
3
**
3
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-6
**
63
2
**
0
**
2
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
2
0
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-2
**
4
0
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
4
4
**
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
4
**
1
15
Yes
0
0
**
**
0
6
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
6
**
**
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
88
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Schoolcraft County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
1,321
15
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
36
11
0
295
0
357
211
16
2. Assignment
*
3
*
0
*
0
*
42
*
0
*
61
*
14
0
3a. Category 1 Disposition
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
3
*
0
*
3
*
6
1
3b. Category 2 Disposition
*
2
*
0
*
0
*
4
*
0
*
7
*
7
0
3c. Category 3 Disposition
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
2
*
0
*
2
*
145
12
3d. Category 4 Disposition
*
1
*
0
*
0
*
19
*
0
*
32
*
22
0
3e. Category 5 Disposition
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
5
*
0
*
5
*
6
0
4. Out of Home Placement
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
6
*
0
*
6
*
31
0
5. Termination of Parental Rights
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
3
0
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
0
Yes
0
0
*
*
0
0
*
*
0
0
*
*
0
0
*
*
0
1
*
*
0
0
*
*
0
1
*
*
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
89
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Shiawassee County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
15,241 267
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
692
97
0
101
0
1,157
2,363
50
2. Assignment
1.21
44
0.41
0
**
0
-3
**
0
-97
0.54
101
0
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-2
**
228
1
3b. Category 2 Disposition
**
3
**
0
-0
-2
**
0
-6
0.64
224
3
3c. Category 3 Disposition
**
8
1.92
0
-0
-0
**
0
-11
1.20
1,593
41
3d. Category 4 Disposition
1.22
24
0.81
0
-0
-0
**
0
-65
0.99
52
1
3e. Category 5 Disposition
**
4
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-5
**
40
0
4. Out of Home Placement
-1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
11
0
5. Termination of Parental Rights
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
7
0
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
-1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
3
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
1
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
17
0
--
3
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
3
**
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
1
44
Yes
0
1
---
0
3
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
4
**
**
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
90
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
St. Clair County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
33,138 1,795
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
1,928
349
0
202
0
4,274
4,774
580 2.24 180 0.65
2. Assignment
11
0.22
0
-1
**
0
-772 1.25
118
32
3a. Category 1 Disposition
2.23
14
3.15
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-46
2.41
187
24
3b. Category 2 Disposition
1.06
6
0.85
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-30
0.99
198
15
3c. Category 3 Disposition
0.62
4
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-19
0.59
3,647
409 0.92 111 0.81
3d. Category 4 Disposition
5
**
0
-1
**
0
-526 0.89
401
45
3e. Category 5 Disposition
0.92
12
0.79
5
**
0
-0
**
0
-62
0.96
78
16
4. Out of Home Placement
0.76
1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-17
0.56
0
0
5. Termination of Parental Rights
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-67
9
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-11
**
18
4
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-5
**
1
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
0
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
3
59
Yes
0
7
**
**
0
1
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
8
**
**
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
91
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
St. Joseph County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Decision Point
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
12,641 806
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
1,886
139
0
94
0
2,925
2,043
173 1.33
2. Assignment
94
0.31
5
**
0
-2
**
0
-274 0.58
72
5
3a. Category 1 Disposition
**
6
1.81
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-11
1.14
82
7
3b. Category 2 Disposition
1.01
3
**
0
**
0
-2
**
0
-12
1.09
59
9
3c. Category 3 Disposition
1.80
4
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-13
1.64
1,531
143 1.10
3d. Category 4 Disposition
68
0.97
9
**
0
-0
**
0
-220 1.07
177
10
3e. Category 5 Disposition
0.67
5
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-15
0.63
27
10
4. Out of Home Placement
**
4
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-14
**
12
0
5. Termination of Parental Rights
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
31
4
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
**
1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-5
**
1
0
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
0
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
4
0
**
1
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
1
**
0
39
Yes
0
8
-**
0
1
-**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
9
-**
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
92
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Tuscola County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
11,574 333
628
66
0
85
0
1,112
1,889
36
0.66
48
0.47
1
**
0
-2
**
0
-87
0.48
111
3
**
1
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-4
**
80
0
**
3
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-3
**
99
2
**
1
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-3
**
1,437
27
0.99
39
1.07
1
**
0
-2
**
0
-69
1.04
71
0
**
0
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-0
**
41
0
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-2
**
10
1
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
12
0
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
7
0
-0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
2
0
--
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
**
5
39
Yes
0
0
---
0
2
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
2
**
**
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
93
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Van Buren County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
14,109 1,182
3,505
150
0
187
0
5,024
2,157
218 1.21 178 0.33
3
**
0
-19
0.66
0
-418 0.54
83
2
**
6
0.88
0
**
0
-2
**
0
-10
0.62
122
18
1.46
4
**
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-22
0.93
145
14
0.96
12
1.00
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-26
0.93
1,379
142
1.02 120 1.05
4
**
0
-12
**
0
-278 1.04
114
12
1.04
10
1.06
0
**
0
-0
**
0
-22
1.00
23
1
**
6
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-8
**
19
5
-3
**
0
-0
-1
**
0
-0
**
24
0
-1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
4
2
**
2
**
0
-0
-0
**
0
-4
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
10
4
**
2
**
0
--
0
--
0
**
0
--
6
**
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
2
31
Yes
0
6
**
**
0
3
**
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
**
**
0
0
---
0
9
**
**
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
94
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Washtenaw County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Value
46,529
2,589
53
94
184
1,935
117
20
29
15
2
0
Value
13,033
2,115
48
53
136
1,561
118
15
26
23
8
0
1
1
**
0
**
0
3
21
Yes
4
9
**
**
1
1
**
**
0
0
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
2.92
1.11
0.69
0.90
0.99
1.23
0.83
**
**
**
--
4,343
5,811
129 0.53
44
0.14
3
**
1
**
6
1.28
0
**
9
0.98
5
**
104 1.08
26
0.79
12
2.06
12
6.03
3
**
0
**
5
**
0
-3
**
0
-1
**
0
-0
-0
--
0
4
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
-**
**
**
**
**
------
334
7
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
----
0.38
**
**
**
**
**
------
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
0
---
------------
23,521
2,299
52
59
150
1,701
142
18
0
26
9
0
1.76
1.10
0.71
0.92
0.99
1.37
0.92
**
**
**
--
0
--
0
--
1
**
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
10
**
**
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
95
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Wayne County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
Value
196,583
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
12,900
2. Assignment
420
3a. Category 1 Disposition
395
3b. Category 2 Disposition
759
3c. Category 3 Disposition
9,804
3d. Category 4 Disposition
471
3e. Category 5 Disposition
158
4. Out of Home Placement
91
5. Termination of Parental Rights
101
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
25
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
2
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Value
198,509
26,182
603
981
1,512
18,472
1,751
354
254
291
252
3
Hispanic or
Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
2.01
0.71
1.22
0.98
0.93
1.83
1.56
1.25
1.29
4.50
**
36,449
1,275
37
34
78
898
72
9
19
20
13
0
0.53
0.89
0.87
1.04
0.93
1.55
0.65
**
**
**
**
14,931
105 0.11
2
**
1
**
9
1.46
86
1.08
2
**
0
**
1
-0
-0
-0
--
0
5
0
0
1
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
-**
**
**
**
**
------
2,069
47
0.35
0
**
0
**
5
**
33
0.92
7
4.08
2
-0
**
0
**
1
**
0
**
All
Minorities
Value
RRI
1.67
0.71
1.20
0.99
0.93
1.82
1.51
**
1.34
4.61
**
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
------------
251,958
27,614
642
1,016
1,605
19,492
1,832
365
0
312
266
3
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
16
46
1.28
1
**
1
--
0
--
0
**
0
--
48
1.30
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
19
155
Yes
38
470
0.89
1.35
1
32
**
**
0
3
---
0
0
---
0
0
**
**
0
0
---
0
505
**
1.41
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
96
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | March 2013
Child Welfare Disproportionality Summary
State : Michigan
Wexford County
Reporting Period:
1/1/12 through 12/31/12
White
Decision Point
1. Population at Risk (Age 0-17)
2. Assignment
3a. Category 1 Disposition
3b. Category 2 Disposition
3c. Category 3 Disposition
3d. Category 4 Disposition
3e. Category 5 Disposition
4. Out of Home Placement
5. Termination of Parental Rights
6a. Exit Foster Care: Adoption
6b. Exit Foster Care: Aged Out
6c. Exit Foster Care: Death
Black or
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
or Latino
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
or other
Pacific
American
Indian or
Alaska
Native
Biracial or
Other
All
Minorities
Value Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI Value RRI
7,178
157
260
73
0
64
0
554
1,490
47
1.44
41
0.76
0
**
1
-11
0.83
0
-100
0.87
60
1
**
2
**
0
-0
**
0
**
0
-3
**
126
3
**
0
**
0
-0
**
3
**
0
-6
0.71
184
4
**
8
1.58
0
-0
**
2
**
0
-14
1.13
985
25
0.80
26
0.96
0
-0
**
5
**
0
-56
0.85
121
7
1.83
1
**
0
-1
**
0
**
0
-9
1.11
26
1
**
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
10
0
**
2
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
10
0
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
**
1
1
**
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-1
**
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
--
6d. Exit Foster Care: Permanent
Guardianship
6e. Exit Foster Care: Relatives
6f. Exit Foster Care: Reunification
Group meets 1% threshold?
8
0
**
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
--
0
**
4
31
Yes
0
0
**
**
0
6
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
0
---
0
6
**
**
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
RRI Key
Statistically significant results:
Results that are not statistically significant
Bold font
Regular font
Group is less than 1% of the youth population
Insufficient number of cases for analysis
Missing data for some element of calculation
*
**
---
Source:
Item 1. Population at risk: U.S. Census estimate from C. Puzzanchera, A. Sladky, and W. Kang, “Easy Access to Juvenile Populations: 1990-2010” (2011), accessed January 11, 2013,
http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezapop/.
Items 2-6. (Assignment, Disposition, Out-of-home placement, Termination of Parental Rights, and Exit Foster Care): Michigan Department of Human Services.
2010-2012 Michigan Child Welfare Data Book | Public Policy Associates, Inc.
97