Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Instructor(s) Office Phone Email Office hours: Class times: Course Description Students will examine the strengths and risk of a military lifestyle on Service Members, Veterans and their Families (SMVF). Students will become proficient in understanding the effects of serving during different eras for use with adult and older adult veteran populations. Institutional Theory and Convergence Theory principles are analyzed providing a framework for ethical differences in civilian versus military attitudes and behavior. Deployment cycles will be analyzed for their impact on SMVF. Internal diversity issues, marginalization, and developmental stage concerns of SMVF populations are addressed throughout the course. Prerequisites: SWK513, SWK553 Course Prerequisite(s) Acceptance into CWMF concentration Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment CSWE Competency Outcomes Addressed in the course CSWE Competencies EP 2.1.4 Engage diversity in practice EP 2.1.7 —Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment. Associated Practice Behaviors a. Recognize the extent to which a culture’s structures and values may oppress, marginalize, alienate, or create or enhance privilege and power; b. Manage potential conflicts between diverse identities within and among individuals and the military and veterans’ organizations; c. Recognize the potential risk and protective factors among diverse populations and communities that may be the result of military service; a. Recognize and assess social support systems and socioeconomic resources specific to service members, veterans, their families, and their communities; recognize the impact of military transitions and stressful life events throughout the family’s life course; b. Identify issues related to losses, stressors, changes, and transitions over their life cycle in designing interventions; c. Demonstrate the ability to critically appraise the impact of the social environment on the overall well-being of service members, veterans, their families, and their communities. Session Covered 2, 3, 6, 7, 8 Assignments Measuring Practice Behaviors Discussion Questions Reading Quizzes 1–8 Military Developmental Stage Interviews Military Developmental Stage Comparison Paper Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Course Learning Objectives Reflected in Significant Learning Types Course Learning Objectives Significant Learning Type Students will critically analyze the range of variables impacting the development and life course of military personnel and their family members. Students will be able to apply the knowledge learned in this class to practice settings where they are working with current and former military personnel and their family members, in a way that reflects understanding of the unique challenges that military service members of all branches of the U.S. military face throughout their life course. Foundational knowledge Students will be able to integrate multiple sources of information on the impact of military service on development and life course of military personnel and their family members, including war cohort, deployment cycle, family constellation, pre-service psychosocial dynamics, and intersectionality of diversity. Students will gain insight into their own perspectives and biases about wars and war cohorts, military service among a range of diverse populations, working to avoid bias for or against military personnel and their family members. Students will develop a compassionate orientation and response to a range of sub-populations within active duty and veteran populations by developing increased empathy. Students will commit to a plan of lifelong learning about the wide range of variables related to military service that impact military personnel and their family members through their life course. Integration Application Human Dimension Caring Learning How to Learn Methods of Instruction This is an online course thus the method of instruction involves the review of online lectures, websites, and other information sources, reading of course materials, as well as asynchronous and interactive online engagement. Required Course Readings Blaisure, K. R., Saathoff-Wells, T., Pereira, A., Wadsworth, S. M., & Dombro, A. L. (2012). Serving Military Families in the 21st Century. Routledge (Taylor & Francis). Rubin, A., Weiss, E. L., & Coll, J. E. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of military social work. John Wiley & Sons (from SWK 800). Other readings as assigned Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Course Policies A complete list of course policies can be found in the Student Handbook located online. Please click on the link listed below: http://dushare.dom.edu/gssw/students/ Grading Policy Grading will follow the Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work grading system (current MSW Student Handbook) with percentage marks associated with corresponding letter grades. Grade A AB+ B BC+ C CF Grade Point Value 4.0 (96-100%) 3.67 (92-95%) 3.5 (88-91%) 3.0 (84-87%) 2.67 (80-83%) 2.5 (76-79%) 2.0 (72-75%) 1.67 (68-71%) 0 (below 68%) Description Excellent Standard Attendance Policy Students are expected to attend and participate on at least 3 different days of the week in each week of an online course. If you miss a week of participation your grade will go down a whole letter grade. Circumstances will be evaluated by your instructor on a case-by-case basis. It is the student’s responsibility to communicate any issues to receive a potential extension. Plagiarism Students are expected to follow the guidelines of the American Psychological Association Publication (APA) Manual 6th Ed. All major assignments are to be uploaded to SafeAssign or Turn-It-In via Canvas to check for Plagiarism. Plagiarism is presenting material from any source as one’s own without proper attribution, which is to include the use of quotation marks when another’s exact wording is used and proper citation when another’s ideas are used but exact wording is not used. Any material other than one’s own that is used in a paper must be properly cited in order to avoid the plagiarism of another’s work. Plagiarism is grounds for a grade of F on the assignment and will be referred to the Dean or Assistant Dean for further disciplinary action. A student suspected of cheating or plagiarism will receive an automatic F for that particular paper, assignment or exam. A written incident report will be sent to the Dean/Assistant Dean. A Student is given a waiver to one offense of Plagiarism. He or she must meet with their academic advisor and develop a plan for resolution. If the student offends a second time they will be referred to the Dean for further disciplinary action and possible dismissal. If the student is dismissed he or she will wait two years for re application to Dominican GSSW. Student must sign Plagiarism Pledge in order to graduate. Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment ADA Compliance Students with disabilities may request special accommodation. Students with special disabilities must provide the professor with a copy of the verification of the disability from the Office of the Dean of Students, Trudy Goggin, by the second week of class in order to receive special accommodations. The Writing Center also provides services to students who need additional reading, writing or computer skills: 708-524-6682. For more information click on the following link: Disability Support Services Learning Agreement The Learning Agreement is a commitment between students and faculty. Students will examine and integrate the resources on this learning agreement page. These resources may include book readings, videos, presentations, worksheets, journal articles, websites, blogs, etc. The student agrees to critically review each resource in their educational process. Reviewing all material is always recommended but if time is an issue, there will be specific instructions next to the category detailing what is required (i.e. Videos (compare at least two). If there are no instructions next to the category, review of all information is required. The resources in your learning agreement will be a base to form your discussion question responses and for integration into your other assignments. Our instructors agree to provide thoughtful discussion and feedback in relation to these resources. Instructors research the information in your courses to deliver current perspectives of military culture and mental health care. Together, the completion of these assignments creates an atmosphere of respect, critical thought, and the opportunity for a collaborative learning process. Course Requirements Assignments Associated Practice Behaviors Possible Points Date Due DQ’s Week 1 - 8 EP 2.1.4, a–c 5 pts/week (total 40) Reading Quizzes EP 2.1.4, a–c 2.5 pts/week (total 20) DQ 1: Weekly, Day 4 DQ 2: Weekly, Day 5 Participation Points: Weekly Day 7 Weekly, Day 7 Military Developmental Stage Interviews EP 2.1.7, a–c 15 Week 4, Day 7 Military Developmental Stage Comparison Paper EP 2.1.7, a–c 25 Week 8, Day 7 Description of Assignments Discussion Questions and Participation Posts (5 pts/week/40 total points) Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Discussion question responses should be between 300–350 words and should reflect and elicit critical thought on the part of other students’ responding to your questions. Participation posts are your responses to your classmates’ DQ responses and should between 50–to–100 words, and should also reflect and elicit critical thought. Although participation posts are must be posted by Day 7, students should be engaging in online conversations throughout the week. Critical thought consists of: Asking questions about the main post or a response then giving your ideas about the answers Respectfully agreeing or disagreeing with the post and supporting your position Discussing how other resources connect with the main post Connecting the main post or other relevant resources to your own personal experiences with military members Critical thought does not include: “I agree or What a great post!” types of responses Posts that are not consistent with the content of the course Disrespectful disagreements or criticism of posts and responses Please review the following website to identify how to earn full points for your discussion questions and responses. How to Write High Quality Discussion Posts and Responses http://www.educationcoffeehouse.com/writers/high_quality_discussion_posts.html#grad Reading Quizzes (2.5 pts/week/20 total points) Each week students will take a 20-item online multiple-choice quiz based solely on the readings for that week. Quizzes must be completed by Sunday at midnight. Military Developmental Stage Interviews (15 points) Students will interview two individuals over the age of 18-years from different developmental stages and/or roles (i.e., soldier and family member, soldier and veteran, etc.) which will be used in the final paper. Students should pay particular attention to diversity as it relates to race, nationality, religion, sexual orientation, gender, and age. Questions should focus on the experiences of the subjects related to military life, with a particular focus on development and topics explored in the course (deployment cycle, adjustment to civilian life, intersectionality, etc.). Questions should be drawn from the readings and should be open-ended allowing for comprehensive responses. Interviews should be conducted in person, but arrangements can be made to conduct interviews via the telephone or email, with instructor guidance (please have subjects sign Dominican University’s participation consent found at the end of the syllabus prior to conducting the interview). Subjects must be over the age of 18. Interview papers will be organized in the following manner: Section 1: Brief summary and Background Information: This section will be between 1-2 pages and will a general summary and background information on the interview subject, similar to what is included in a psychosocial evaluation (demographic information, such as gender, age, race; connection to military, length of service, active or veteran, etc.). Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Section II: Question/Responses: This section will be between 4-6 pages and will include a transcript of the questions and subject responses. Section III: This section will be between 1-2 pages and will include a summary of the interview, including the student’s insights about the interviewing process (this can be written in first person). Military Developmental Stage Comparison Paper (25 points) Students will write a 15-20 page paper in APA format exploring the impact of military service has on the psychobio-social-spiritual development of service members and their family members. This paper will be written in formal academic tone, will include a comprehensive literature review with an application of theoretical concepts and frameworks (to your interview subjects). This paper can be approached from a range of perspectives and students are encouraged to be creative in how they develop their approach. Students will be assessed based on their ability to articulate the developmental course of the subjects as it pertains to broader patterns and theoretical constructs reflected in the pertinent scholarship, and concepts explored in the class. This paper is primarily theoretical, with application to selected populations (the populations of the subjects). Papers must include a broad introduction on military, including the strengths and risks of a military lifestyle on service members, veterans and their families. The body of the paper will narrow in on the populations that the interview subjects are members of, drawing on the interviews when applying concepts and theories. Students will then compare and contrast the experiences of the two subjects and highlight areas where experiences are supportive and conflict, paying particular attention to age at entry, acculturation, deployment cycle, combat exposure, adjustment to civilian life, from biopsychosocialspiritual and intersectionality perspectives. Even though you cannot interview anyone under the age of 18, you can draw on the impact of military service (strengths and weaknesses) by developing questions addressing a range of family dynamics. The analyses will be situated within theoretical and conceptual frameworks that help explain these processes, drawing from the assigned readings as well as outside scholarly sources (15-20 references). The conclusion of the paper will provide a comprehensive summary, providing conclusions, exploring connections, and highlighting the role of social workers working with these populations. Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Course Outline and Detailed Description of Assignments Sequence of Learning Activities Session 1 Date Method of Instruction In Class Topics and Activities Reading/Assignments Due Online Topic: The Impact of Military Service on Development and Life Course, an Introduction Online Tasks: Download and review syllabus (Day 1) Check-in on Canvas (Day 1) DQ 1: Describe your interest in the area of military social work and any experience you have had in this field. What do you hope to learn from this course? (Day 4) DQ 2: What are some effects of war on service members that you didn’t previously anticipate? What challenges are involved and barriers to service that social worker can address? (Day 5) Participation posts (Day 7) Activities/Lecture: Introduction to the course o Review syllabus o Review course policies Introduction to the effect of war service on members and family o Overview of developmental theory Readings: Serving Military Families in the 21st Century, Chapters 2 “An Introduction to Military Culture and Military Families” and Chapter 7 “The Effects of War on Service Members” Assignments Due: Readings Quiz 1 (Day 7) 2 Online Topics: Active Military: The Impact of Military Service on Development and Life Course Activities/Lecture: Deployment Issues Biopsychosoical Issues Impact on Community Multicultural Considerations Theoretical Application Online Tasks: DQ 1: Review the website for the Millennium Cohort Family Study (https://www.millenniumcohort. org/). What is the purpose of this study? What are some dynamics involved in deployment cycles (multiple deployments, etc.) and how do these dynamics impact active military personnel? Note at least one thing that surprised you about this study (Day 4) DQ 2: Review the Army STARRS website and share your Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment thoughts on this study. What is something you learned about the impact of military service on military personnel that you didn’t know before? What role does diversity play in the psychosocial issues impacting active military personnel? (Day 5) Participation posts (Day 7) Readings: Crum‐ Cianflone, N. F., Fairbank, J. A., Marmar, C. R., & Schlenger, W. (2014). The Millennium Cohort Family Study: a prospective evaluation of the health and well‐ being of military service members and their families. International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 23(3), 320-330. Curtis, J., & Payne, F. (2010). The differential impact of mortality of American troops in the Iraq War: The non-metropolitan dimension. Demographic research, 23(2), 41-62. Yu-Chu, S., Arkes, J., Boon Wah, K., Lai Yee, T., & Williams, T. V. (2010). Effects of Iraq/Afghanistan Deployments on PTSD Diagnoses for Still Active Personnel in All Four Services. Military Medicine,175(10), 763-769. Assignments Due: Readings Quiz 2 (Day 7) 3 Online Topics: Active Military Families: The Impact of Military Service on the Family System and Spouses Activities/Lecture: Demographics Online Tasks: DQ 1: In what ways do you believe shifting demographics among military service members is and will continue to impact families? (Day 4) Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Developmental Issues Deployment Issues and Impact on Family Dynamics and Development Psychosocial Issues and Needs Multicultural Considerations Stress and Well-being DQ 2: Cite some multicultural considerations regarding the impact of active duty on families and spouses. What do you believe are the core issues involved? Can social workers address these issues, and if so how? (Day 5) Participation posts (Day 7) Readings: Serving Military Families in the 21st Century, Chapter 8 “The Effects of War on Families” Barker, L. H., & Berry, K. D. (2009). Developmental issues impacting military families with young children during single and multiple deployments. Military medicine, 174(10), 1033-1040. Clever, M., & Segal, D. R. (2013). The Demographics of Military Children and Families. Future Of Children, 23(2), 13-39. Crum‐ Cianflone, N. F., Fairbank, J. A., Marmar, C. R., & Schlenger, W. (2014). The Millennium Cohort Family Study: a prospective evaluation of the health and well‐ being of military service members and their families. International journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 23(3), 320-330. Drummet, A. R., Coleman, M., & Cable, S. (2003). Military families under stress: Implications for family life education. Family Relations, 52(3), 279-287. Lowe, K. N., Adams, K. S., Browne, Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment B. L., & Hinkle, K. T. (2012). Impact of military deployment on family relationships. Journal Of Family Studies, 18(1), 17-27. Assignments Due: Readings Quiz 3 (Day 7) 4 Online Topics: Active Military Families: The Impact of Military Service on the Family System and Spouses (cont.) Activities/Lecture: Single Mothers Multicultural Considerations Theoretical Application Online Tasks: DQ 1: What are your thoughts on the article “Mothers in Combat Boots”? Share your conclusions and insights about single mothers’ service in the military. What is the role of social work in addressing any issues noted? (Day 4) DQ 2: Briefly apply one of the theories explored in class this week on military single mothers. What issues are highlighted? How do areas of diversity impact the challenges faced by active duty single moms, including race, sexual orientation, age, etc.? (Day 5) Participation posts (Day 7) Readings: Serving Military Families in the 21st Century, Chapter 12 “Supporting Military Families: Applying Theory and Research to Practice” Eberstadt, M. (2010). Mothers in Combat Boots. Policy Review [serial online], (159), 33-44. Lester, P., Paley, B., & Saltzman, W. (2013). Military Service, War, and Families: Considerations for Child Development, Prevention and Intervention, and Public Health Policy. Clinical Child & Family Psychology Review, 16(3), 229232. doi:10.1007/s10567-0130147-x Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Paley, B., Lester, P., & Mogil, C. (2013). Family systems and ecological perspectives on the impact of deployment on military families. Clinical child and family psychology review, 16(3), 245-265 5 Online Topics: Active Military Families: The Impact of Military Service on Children Activities/Lecture: The Deployment Cycle: Impact on Children Developmental Issues Psychosocial Effect and Issues Theoretical Application Assignments Due: Readings Quiz 4 (Day 7) Military Developmental Stage Interviews (Day 7) Online Tasks: DQ 1: What are some of the psychosocial effects of multiple deployment on children of active military personnel? How does deployments impact parenting? Feel free to touch on the role of social work in addressing these challenges. (Day 4) DQ 2: What are some ways that younger children are impacted by a parent’s deployment. What variables can increase challenges and which ones mediate them? Knowing what you know about child development, what concerns do you have about younger children from military families? (Day 5) Participation posts (Day 7) Readings: Serving Military Families in the 21st Century, Chapter 4 “Children and Youth in Military Families” DeVoe, E. R., & Ross, A. (2012). The Parenting Cycle of Deployment. Military Medicine, 177(2), 184-190. Flake, E. M., Davis, B. E., Johnson, P. L., & Middleton, L. S. (2009). The psychosocial effects of deployment on Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment military children. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 30(4), 271-278. Lester, P., & Flake, E. (2013). How Wartime Military Service Affects Children and Families. Future Of Children, 23(2), 121-141. Osofsky, J. D., & Chartrand, M. M. (2013). Military Children from Birth to Five Years. Future Of Children, 23(2), 61-77. 6 Online Topics: Veterans: The Impact of Military Services on Veterans by War Cohort: Global War on Terror/ Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) Activities/Lecture: Post-deployment Issues Psychosocial Effect and Issues Multicultural Considerations Theoretical Application Assignments: Readings Quiz 5 (Day 7) Online Tasks: DQ 1: Watch the presentation located at: http://www.uctv.tv/shows/Combat -to-Community-Needs-Resourcesfor-Post-September-11-Veterans15597 What were your overall thoughts on this presentation? What two or three challenge/barrier with which you were not previously familiar? What is the role of the social worker in addressing these challenges? (Day 4) (Note: This DQ is worth 5 points due to the length of the video) Participation Posts (Day 7) Readings: Baker, M. S. (2014). Casualties of the Global War on Terror and Their Future Impact on Health Care and Society: A Looming Public Health Crisis. Military Medicine, 179(4), 348-355. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-1300471 Flynn, M. & Hussan, A. (2010). Unique challenges of Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Journal of Social Work Education, 46, 169-173. Franklin, E. (2009). The emerging needs of veterans: A call to action for the social work profession. Health & Social Work, 34(3), 163-167. MacManus, D., Rona, R., Dickson, H., Somaini, G., Fear, N., & Wessely, S. (2015). Aggressive and violent behavior among military personnel deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan: prevalence and link with deployment and combat exposure. Epidemiologic reviews, 37(1), 196-212. Assignments Due: Readings Quiz 6 (Day 7) 7 Online Topics: Veterans: The Impact of Military Services on Veterans by War Cohort Activities/Lecture: Comparative Research (Cohort) Health and Mental Health Outcomes Psychosocial Issues and Needs Multicultural Considerations Online Tasks: DQ 1: What are some unique dynamics that may render the life course of some military veterans more challenging than others? (Day 4) DQ 2: Discuss some multicultural considerations that may interact with war cohort in determining the life course of military veterans. Assuming you were a social worker working with the veterans population, how might familiarity with the nature of intersectionality of diversity help you in your practice? (Day 5) Participation posts (Day 7) Readings: Bedard, K., & Deschenes, O. (2006). The long-term impact of military service on health: Evidence from World War II and Korean War Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment veterans. American Economic Review, 96, 176-194. Brooks, M. S., & Fulton, L. (2010). Evidence of poorer life-course mental health outcomes among veterans of the Korean War cohort. Aging & mental health,14(2), 177-183. Kline, A., Callahan, L., Butler, M., St. Hill, L., Losonczy, M. F., & Smelson, D. A. (2009). The Relationship Between Military Service Eras and Psychosocial Treatment Needs Among Homeless Veterans With a CoOccurring Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorder. Journal Of Dual Diagnosis, 5(3/4), 357-374. doi:10.1080/155042609031758 82 Stafford, S. R. (2001). The Good War v The Bad War: An Analysis of Combat Veterans' Experience in World War II and Vietnam by Removing Social Stigma. Senior Thesis Projects, 1993-2002, 76. Available at: http://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/v iewcontent.cgi?article=1075&c ontext=utk_interstp2 Assignments Due: Readings Quiz 7 (Day 7) 8 Online Topics: Aging Veterans: Lifespan implications of military service on veterans Activities/Lecture: Successful Aging Psychosocial Issues and Needs Multicultural Considerations Online Tasks: DQ 1: Discuss some psychosocial challenges that aging veterans are currently facing. What are some mediating variables? What are some exacerbating variables? Which ones did you not previously anticipate? (Day 4) DQ 2: What barriers exist to successful aging for many aging Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment veterans? What do you believe is the role of social work in addressing these barriers? (Day 5) Participation posts (Day 7) Readings: Handbook of Military Social Work, Chapter 15 “Homelessness among Veterans” Chatterjee, S., Spiro, A., King, L., King, D., & Davison, E. (2009). Research on aging military veterans: Lifespan implications of military service. PTSD Research quarterly, 20(3), 1-8. MacLean, A. & Edwards, R. (2013). Health, Aging, and the PostService Life Cycles of U.S. Veterans. In Jomana Amara and Ann Hendricks, eds., Military Medical Care: From PreDeployment to Post-Separation. Routledge. Available online at: http://qcpages.qc.cuny.edu/~red wards/Papers/maclean_edwards _milmedcare13.pdf Pietrzak, R. H., Tsai, J., Kirwin, P. D., & Southwick, S. M. (2014). Successful aging among older veterans in the United States. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 22(6), 551-563. Sheehan, C. M., Hummer, R. A., Moore, B. L., Huyser, K. R., & Butler, J. S. Duty, Honor, Country, Disparity: Race/Ethnic Differences in Health and Disability Among Male Veterans. Population Research and Policy Review, 1-20. Teachman, J. (2010).Military service and the life course: An assessment of what we know. Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment NCFR, Available online at: https://www.ncfr.org/ncfrreport/focus/militaryfamilies/military-service-lifecourse-assessment. Assignments Due: Readings Quiz 8 (Day 7) Military Developmental Stage Comparison Paper (Day 7) Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment GSSW Rubric – Discussion Questions Exemplary Demonstration Proficient Demonstration Competent Demonstration Developing Demonstration Beginning Demonstration Specific Performance Criteria (10 points Discussion question addressed each area of the question with added information about the subject matter Over 350 words Discussion question addressed each area of the question with at least 350 words Discussion question addressed most of each area of the question with between 250 300 words Discussion question addressed some areas of the question with between 200 - 250 words Discussion question addressed minimally the components (or none) in the question and/or is under 200 words APA Formatting (2.5 points) No errors in APA formatting. Scholarly style. At least two references used. Rare errors in APA style that do not detract from the discussion question. At least one reference used. Errors in APA style are occasional. At least one reference used. Errors in APA style are noticeable. No references or lack of complete reference. Errors in APA style detract substantially from the paper. No references Writing (2.5 points) Writing is flowing and easy to follow. The paper consistently models the language and conventions used in scholarly/ professional literature appropriate to the student’s discipline and is error-free. The Discussion Question would meet the guidelines for submission for publication in a peer reviewed scholarly journal in the student's field of study. APA 6th formatting is errorfree. Scholarly style. Writing has minimal awkward of unclear passages. The style and format (APA 6th) are broadly followed, but inconsistencies are apparent. There is selection of less suitable scholarly sources (non-peer reviewed literature, excessive use web information). Weak transitions and apparent logic gaps occur between topics being addressed. The style may be difficult to follow so as to detract from the comprehensibility of the Discussion Question. Word choice occasionally informal in tone. Writing has a few awkward or unclear passages. Word choice is informal in tone. Writing is choppy, with many awkward or unclear passages. While some educational conventions are followed, others are not. Paper lacks consistency of style and no evidence of the use of APA 6th in formatting. It may be unclear which references are direct quotes and which are paraphrased. Based on the information provided, the reader would have some difficulty referring The stylistic conventions of scholarly writing are not followed. Fails to demonstrate thoroughness and competence in documentation. Inappropriate style and format make reading and comprehensibility problematic. Please seek help from the learning While there may be minor errors, conventions for style and format (APA 6th) are used consistently throughout the paper. Demonstrates thoroughness and competence in documenting sources; the reader would have little difficulty referring back to cited sources. Style and format contribute to the comprehensibility of the paper. Suitably models the discipline's overall Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment journalistic back to cited sources. Significant revisions would contribute to the comprehensibility of the paper. Participation (5 points More than 3 quality discussion posts of over 100 words each 3 quality discussion responses of over 100 words each 2 quality discussion responses of 100 words or 3 responses of less than 100 words 1 discussion response of 100 words or less or 2 responses of less than 100 0 discussion responses or a response of less than 100 words Military Integration for CSWE competencies Discussion Question and responses consistently used appropriate military terms and concepts while adding information Discussion Question and responses consistently used appropriate military terms and concepts Discussion Question and responses used appropriate military terms and concepts Discussion Question and responses minimally used appropriate military terms and concepts Discussion Question and responses did not used appropriate military terms and concepts EP 2.1.1— Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly. EP 2.1.2— Apply social work ethical principles to guide professional practice. (5 points) Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment GSSW Rubric – Assignments Exemplary Demonstration Proficient Demonstration Competent Demonstration Developing Demonstration Beginning Demonstration Specific Performanc e Criteria 60 points(10 points per criteria) Assignment addressed each area sufficiently with added information about the subject matter Assignment addressed each area sufficiently Assignment addressed most of each area but missed two or more key concepts Assignment addressed some areas but missed more than 4 key concepts Assignment addressed none of the related concepts APA Formatting 5 points No errors in APA formatting. Scholarly style. At least two references used. Rare errors in APA style that do not detract from the Assignment. At least one reference used. Errors in APA style are occasional. At least one reference used. Errors in APA style are noticeable. No references or lack of complete reference. Errors in APA style detract substantially from the paper. No references Writing 10 points Writing is flowing and easy to follow. The paper consistently models the language and conventions used in scholarly/ professional literature appropriate to the student’s discipline and is error-free. The Assignment would meet the guidelines for submission for publication in a peer reviewed scholarly journal in the student's field of study. APA 6th formatting is error-free. Scholarly style. Writing has minimal awkward of unclear passages. The style and format (APA 6th) are broadly followed, but inconsistencies are apparent. There is selection of less suitable scholarly sources (nonpeer reviewed literature, excessive use web information). Weak transitions and apparent logic gaps occur between topics being addressed. The style may be Word choice occasionally informal in tone. Writing has a few awkward or unclear passages. Word choice is informal in tone. Writing is choppy, with many awkward or unclear passages. While some educational conventions are followed, others are not. Paper lacks consistency of style and no evidence of the use of APA 6th in formatting. It may be unclear which references are direct quotes and which are paraphrased. Based on the information provided, the reader would have some difficulty referring back to cited sources. Significant revisions would contribute to The stylistic conventions of scholarly writing are not followed. Fails to demonstrate thoroughness and competence in documentation. Inappropriate style and format make reading and comprehensibility problematic. Please seek help from the learning While there may be minor errors, conventions for style and format (APA 6th) are used consistently throughout the paper. Demonstrates thoroughness and competence in documenting sources; the reader would have little difficulty referring back to cited sources. Style and format contribute to the comprehensibility Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Military Integration for CSWE EP 2.1.4— Engage diversity and difference in practice. 5 points Assignment consistently used appropriate military terms and concepts while adding information of the paper. Suitably models the discipline's overall journalistic difficult to follow so as to detract from the comprehensibilit y of the Assignment. the comprehensibility of the paper. Assignment consistently used appropriate military terms and concepts Assignment used appropriate military terms and concepts Assignment minimally used appropriate military terms and concepts Assignment did not used appropriate military terms and concepts Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Recommended Readings MILITARY SOCIAL WORK: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Flynn, M. & Hussan, A. (2010). Unique challenges of war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Journal of Social Work Education, 46, 169-173. Harris, J. (2012). A brief history of U.S. military families and the role of social workers. Chapter 18 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Manske, J.E. (2006). Social work in the Department of Veteran Affairs: Lessons learned. Health and Social Work. 31, 233-238 Rubin, A & Harvie, H. (2012). A brief history of social work with the military and veterans. Chapter 1 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Savinsky, L., Illingworth, M. & DuLaney, M. (2009). Civilian social work: Serving the military and veteran populations. Social Work, 54, 327-339. MILITARY CULTURE: ETHOS, ACCULTURATION, NEW WARS Abbe, A., Gulick, L. M. V., & Herman, J. L. (2007). Cross-cultural competence in Army leaders: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Washington, DC: U.S. Army Research Institute. Buck, J. H. (1981). Professional ideals and military behavior. Air University Review, Mar-Apr. Retrieved from http://www.airpower.au.af.mil/airchronicles/aureview/1981/mar-apr/buck.htm Chassman, J., & Cave, C. (2011). Cultural, Ethnic and Racial Groups. Office of Mental Health. Retrieved from http://www.omh.state.ny.us/omhweb/savinglives/volume2/cultural_groups.html Coll, J. E., Weiss, E. L., & Metal, M. (2012). Military culture and diversity. Chapter 2 in A. Coll, J. E., Weiss, E. L. (2012). Transitioning veterans into civilian life. Chapter 17 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Coll, J. E., Weiss, E. L., & Yarvis, J. S. (2011). No one leaves unchanged: insights for civilian mental health care professionals into the military experience and culture. Social work in health care, 50(7), 487-500. Defense Centers of Excellence (DCoE). (2009). Military Cultural Competence. Retrieved from http://www.essentiallearning.net/student/content/sections/Lectora/MilitaryCultureCompetence/index.htm/ Hall, L. K. (2011). The importance of understanding military culture. Social work in health care, 50(1), 4-18. Junger, S. (2011, July 16) Why would anyone miss war? Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/17/opinion/sunday/17junger.html?_r=0 Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Kelty, R., Kleykamp, M. & Segal, D.R. (2010). The military and the transition to adulthood. Future of Children, 20, 181-207. Luby, C.D., (2014). Promoting military cultural awareness in an off-post community of behavioral health and social support service providers . Advances in Social Work, 13(1), 67-82. Petrovich, J. (2012). Culturally competent social work practice with veterans: An overview of the US military. Journal of human behavior in the social environment, 22(7), 863-874. Reger, M. A., Etherage, J. R., Reger, G. M., & Gahm, G. A. (2008). Civilian psychologists in an Army culture: The ethical challenge of cultural competence. Military Psychology, 20(1), 21-35. Scharf, M., Mayseless, O., & Kivenson-Baron, I. (2011). Leaving the parental nest: Adjustment problems, attachment representations, and social support during the transition from high school to military service. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40(3), 411-423. United States Army. (2013). Army Demographics: FY13 Army profile. Retrieved from http://www.armyg1.army.mil/hr/docs/demographics/FinalFY13Army%20ProfileReport.pdf United States Army. (2008). The changing profile of the Army: 1985-2008. Retrieved from http://www.armyg1.army.mil/hr/docs/demographics/Changing%20Profile%20report%20December% 202008.pdf ETHICAL CHALLENGES Daley, J.G. (2012). Ethical decision making in military social work. Chapter 4 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Daley, J.G. (1999). Understanding the military as an ethnic identity. In J.G. Daley (Ed.) Social work practice in the military (pp. 291-303). New York, NY: Haworth Press. Kennedy, C. H., & Moore, B. A. (2008). Evolution of clinical military psychology ethics. Military Psychology, 20, 1-6. National Association of Social Workers. (2012). NASW standards for social work practice with service members, veterans, & their families. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/practice/military/documents/MilitaryStandards2012.pdf PSYCHOSOCIAL NEEDS OF MILITARY: RE-ENTRY, MENTAL ILLNESS, PTSD, OTHER General: Treatment Modalities/Challenges Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Adler, A.B., Bliese, P.D., McGurk, D. & Hoge, C.W. (2009) Battlemind debriefing and battlemind training as early interventions with soldiers returning from Iraq: Randomization by platoon. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 77, 928-940. Batten, S.V. & Pollack, S.J. (2008). Integrative outpatient treatment for returning service members. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 64, 928-939. Britt, T.W., Greene-Shortridge, T.M., & Castro, C. (2007). The stigma of mental health problems in the military. Military Medicine, 172, 157- 161. Cartwright, T. (2011). “To care for him who shall have borne the battle”: The recent development of veterans treatment courts in America. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 22(1), 295-316. Coll, J.E., Weiss, E.L. Draves, P., & Dyer, D. (2012). The impact of military cultural awareness, experience, attitudes, and education on clinical self-efficacy in the treatment of veterans. Journal of International Continuing Social Work Education, 15(1), 39-48. Crum‐ Cianflone, N. F., Fairbank, J. A., Marmar, C. R., & Schlenger, W. (2014). The Millennium Cohort Family Study: a prospective evaluation of the health and well‐ being of military service members and their families. International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 23(3), 320-330. Exum, H., Coll, J.E., & Weiss, E.L. (2011). A civilian counselor's primer for counseling veterans (2nd ed.). Deerpark, NY: Linus. Flynn, M., & Hassan, A. M. (2010). Unique challenges of war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Journal of Social Work Education, 46, 169–173. Franklin, E. (2009). The emerging needs of veterans: A call to action for the social work profession. Health & Social Work, 34(3), 163-167. Gifford, R.K. (2006). Psychological aspects of combat. In Britt, T.W., Adler, A. B. & Castro, C.A. (Eds.). Military Life: The psychology of serving in peace and combat. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Security International. Healy, P. (2009, November 12). The anguish of war for today’s soldiers, explored by Sophocles. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/12/theater/12greeks.html?pagewanted=all Hoge, C.W., Castro, C.A., Meser, S.C, McGurk, K, Cotting, D. I & Koffman, R.L., (2004). Combat duty in Iraq & Afghanistan, mental health problems and barriers to care. New England Journal of Medicine, 351, 13-22. Mental Health Stigma in the Military. Retrieved from http://www.eachmindmatters.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/02/RAND_RR426.pdf Roberts, J. (2012). Navigating systems of care. Chapter 16 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Returning Home/Post-Deployment Care Garcia, M. (2009). Combat to community: Needs and resources for post-September 11veterans. Cultural competency: Iraq and Afghanistan veterans. Podcast retrieved from http://www.uctv.tv/searchdetails.aspx?showID=15597/ Hoge, C. W., Auchterlonie, J. L., & Milliken, C. S. (2006). Mental health problems, use of mental health services, and attrition from military service after returning from deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan. Jama, 295(9), 1023-1032. Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2010). Returning home from Iraq and Afghanistan: Preliminary assessment of readjustment needs of veterans, service members, and their families. Committee on the Initial Assessment of Readjustment Needs of Military Personnel, Veterans, and Their Families; Board on the Health of Selected Populations, 1-193. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12812.html/ MacLean, A., & Kleykamp, M. (2014). Coming Home: Attitudes toward US Veterans Returning from Iraq. Social Problems, 61(1), 131-154. Slone, L. B., & Friedman, M. J. (2008). After the war zone: A practical guide for returning troops and their families. Philadelphia, PA: Da Capo Press. Spelman, J. F., Hunt, S. C., Seal, K. H., & Burgo-Black, A. L. (2012). Post deployment care for returning combat veterans. Journal of general internal medicine, 27(9), 1200-1209. PTSD/Combat Exposure Bride, B. E., & Figley, C. R. (2009). Secondary trauma and military veteran caregivers. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 79(3), 314-329. Capehart, B. & Jeffreys, M. (2012). Psychopharmacology for PTSD and co-occurring disorders. Chapter 9 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Leaman, S, Rothbaum, B.O. Difede, J. Cudor, J., Gerardi, M. & Rizzo, A. (2012). Treating Combat related PTSD with virtual reality exposure therapy. Chapter 8 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Lee, H. A., Gabriel, R., & Bale, A. J. (2005). Clinical outcomes of Gulf Veterans' Medical Assessment Programme referrals to specialized centers for Gulf veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder. Military Medicine, 170(5), 400-405. MacManus, D., Rona, R., Dickson, H., Somaini, G., Fear, N., & Wessely, S. (2015). Aggressive and violent behavior among military personnel deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan: prevalence and link with deployment and combat exposure. Epidemiologic reviews, 37(1), 196-212. Maguen, S. et al. (2010). The impact of reported direct and indirect killing on mental health symptoms in Iraq War Veterans. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 23(1) 86-90. Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Stehberg, J., Albright, D.L., & Weiss, E.L. (2012). The neurobiology of PTSD and cognitive processing therapy (CPT). Chapter 7 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Van Winkle, E.P. & Safer, M. (2011). Killing versus witnessing in combat trauma and reports of PTSD symptoms and domestic violence. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 24(1) 107-110. Yarvis, J.S. (2012). Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in veterans. Chapter 6 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds.) Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Suicide Braswell, H., & Kushner, H. I. (2012). Suicide, social integration, and masculinity in the US military. Social science & medicine, 74(4), 530-536. Bryan, C. J., Jennings, K. W., Jobes, D. A., & Bradley, J. C. (2012). Understanding and preventing military suicide. Archives of Suicide Research,16(2), 95-110. Cato, C. (2012). Suicide in the military. Chapter 14 in A. Rubin, E.Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Jobes, D. A. (2013). Reflections on suicide among soldiers. Psychiatry, 76(2), 126-131. doi:10.1521/psyc.2013.76.2.126 Levin, A. (2014). Army Culture Must Change to Fight Spiraling Mental Health Crisis. http://psychnews.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/pn.45.17.psychnews_45_17_014 United States. Department of Defense. Suicide event report: Calendar year 2013 annual report. Retrieved from http://www.suicideoutreach.org/Docs/Reports/2013_DoDSER_Annual_Report.pdf TBI Boyd, C, & Asmussen, S. (2012). Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and the military. Chapter 10 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. French, L.M. & Parkinson, G.W. (2008). Assessing and treating veterans with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 84, 1004-1013. Struchen, M.A., Clark, A.N, & Rubin, A. (2012). TBI and social work practice. Chapter 11 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Wheaton, S. (2012, January 9). When injuries to the brain tear at hearts. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/10/health/when-injuries-to-the-brain-tear-athearts.html?pagewanted=all Substance abuse Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Boyce, P. K. (2012). A theoretical approach to understanding alcohol misuse in military personnel returning home from Operation Iraqii (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) (Doctoral dissertation). Blow, A., MacInnes, M. D., Hamel, J., Ames, B., Onaga, E., Holtrop, K., ... & Smith, S. (2012). National Guard service members returning home after deployment: The case for increased community support. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 39(5), 383393. Burda-Chmielewski, R. & Nowlin, A. (2012). Preventing and intervening with substance use disorders in veterans. Chapter 13 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Rubin, A. & Barnes, W.G. (2012). Assessing, preventing and treating substance use disorders in active duty military settings. Chapter 12 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. WORKING WITH FAMILIES AND CHILDREN OF DEPLOYED Basham, K. (2012). Couple therapy for redeployed military and veteran couples. Chapter 25 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Cozza, S. J. (2011). Children of military service members: Raising national awareness of the family health consequences of combat deployment. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.117 Cozza, S. Chun, R., Polo, J. (2005). Military families and children during the operation Iraqi Freedom. Psychiatric Quarterly, 76, 371-378. Eaton, K., Hoge, C.W., Messer, S., Whitt, A., Cabrora, O, McGurk,D., Cox, A., & Castro, C.A. (2008). Prevalence of mental health problems, treatment need, and barriers to care among primary care-seeking spouses of military service members involved in Iraq and Afghanistan deployments. Military Medicine, 173, 1051-6. Franklin, K. (2012). Cycle of deployment and family well-being. Chapter 19 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Gibbs, D.A., Martin, S.L., Kupper, L.I., & Johnson, R.E. (2007). Child maltreatment in enlisted soldiers’ families during combat-related deployments. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298, 528-535. Gottman, J.M, Gottman, J.S., & Atkins, C. (2011). The comprehensive soldier fitness program: Family skills component. American Psychologist, 66, 52-57. Hall, L. K. (2008). Counseling military families: What mental health professionals need to know. New York: Taylor and Francis Group. Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Harnett, C. (2013). Supporting National Guard and Reserve members and their families. Chapter 20 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Harrington-LaMorie, J. (2012). Grief, loss and Bereavement in military families. Chapter 22 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Knobloch, L. K., & Theiss, J. A. (2012). Experiences of US military couples during the post-deployment transition Applying the relational turbulence model.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(4), 423-450. Leskin, G.A., Garcia. E. D’Amico, J., Mogil, C.E., Lester, P.E. (2012) Family-centered programs and interventions for military children and youth. In A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Marshall, A.D., Panuzio, J., & Taft, C.T. (2005). Intimate partner violence among military veterans and actice duty service men. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 862-876. Monson, C.M & Fredman, S. (2008). Cognitive-behavioral conjoint therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder: Application to Operation Enduring and Iraqi Freedom veterans. Journal of Clinical Psychology In Session, 64, 958-971. Operation READY. (2010). The Army Family Readiness Group Leaders Handbook. Retrieved from http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/army/frg_hdbk.pdf/ Weiss, E.G., DeBraber, Santoyo, A., & Creager, T. (2012). Theory and practice with military couples and families. Chapter 26 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Wilson, S. R., Gettings, P. E., Hall, E. D., & Pastor, R. G. (2014). Dilemmas Families Face in Talking With Returning US Military Service Members About Seeking Professional Help for Mental Health Issues. Health communication, (ahead-of-print), 1-12. MILITARY SERVICE AND IMPACT ON THE LIFECOURSE Bedard, K., & Deschenes, O. (2006). The long-term impact of military service on health: Evidence from World War II and Korean War veterans. American Economic Review, 96, 176-194. Bouffard, L. (2005). The military as a bridging environment in criminal careers: Differential outcomes of the military experience. Armed Forces and Society, 41, 491-510. Bouffard, L., & Laub, J. (2004). Jail or the Army: Does military service facilitate desistance from crime? In S. Maruna & R. Immarigeon (eds.), After crime and punishment (pp. 129-151). London: Willan. Dobkin, C., & Shabani, R. (2007). The health effects of military service: Evidence from the Vietnam draft. Economic Inquiry, 45, 112. Fredland, J., & Little, R. (1980). Long-term returns to vocational training: Evidence from military sources. Journal of Human Resources, 15, 4966. Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Pavalko, E., & Elder, G. (1990). World War II and divorce: A life-course perspective. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1213-1234. Pettit, B., & Western, B. (2004). Mass imprisonment and the life course: Race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration. American Sociological Review, 69, 151-169. Ruger, W., Wilson, S., & Waddoups, S. (2002). Warfare and welfare: Military service, combat, and marital dissolution. Armed Forces and Society, 29, 85-107. Sampson, R., & Laub, J. (1996). Socioeconomic achievement in the life course of disadvantaged men: Military service as a turning point, circa 1940-1965. American Sociological Review, 61, 347-367. Stanley, M. (2003). College education and the midcentury GI bills. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 671-708. Teachman, J. (2004). Military service during the Vietnam era: Were there consequences for subsequent civilian earnings? Social Forces, 83, 709-730. Teachman, J. (2005). Military service in the Vietnam Era and educational attainment. Sociology of Education, 78, 50-68. Teachman, J. (2008). Divorce, race, and military service: More than equal pay and equal opportunity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 1030-1044. Teachman, J., & Tedrow, L. (2004). Wages, earnings, and occupational status: Did World War II veterans receive a premium? Social Science Research, 33, 581-605. Teachman, J., & Tedrow, L. (2007). Joining up: Did military service in the early all volunteer era affect subsequent civilian income? Social Science Research, 36, 1447-1474. SPECIAL POPULATIONS Women/Sexual Harassment Bell, M.E. & Reardon, A. (2012). Experiences of sexual harassment and sexual assault in the military among OEF/OIF veterans: Implications for health care providers. Social Work in Health Care, 50, 34-50. Corbett, S. (2007, March 15). The Women’s War. New York Times Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/18/magazine/18cover.html?pagewanted=all Kimmerly, R., Street, A., Pavao, J, Smith, M., Cronkite, R., Holmes, T., & Frayne, S. (2010). Military-related sexual trauma among Veterans Health Administration patients returning from Afghanistan and Iraq. American Journal of Public Health, 100,1409-1412. Mattocks, K. M., Haskell, S. G., Krebs, E. E., Justice, A. C., Yano, E. M., & Brandt, C. (2012). Women at war: Understanding how women veterans cope with combat and military sexual trauma. Social Science & Medicine, 74(4), 537-545. Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Washington, D., Yano, E., McGuire, J. & Hines, V. (2010). Risk factors for homelessness among women veterans. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 21(1), 82-91. Weiss, E. L., & DeBraber, T. (2012). Women in the military. Chapter 3 in A. Rubin, E. Weiss & J. Coll (Eds). Handbook of Military Social Work. New York: Wiley and Sons. Ethnic Minority Populations Copenhaver, C. M. (2014). The Integration of Minorities into Special Operations: How Cultural Diversity Enhances Operations (Doctoral dissertation, US Army). National History & Heritage Command. (2012). Native Americans in the U.S. Military. Retrieved from http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq61-1.htm Stock, M.D. (2006). Essential to the fight: Immigrants in the military, five years after 9/11. Immigration Policy in Focus, 5(9). Gays and Lesbians Bumiller, E. (2012, September 10). One year later, military says gay policy is working. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/20/us/dont-ask-dont-tell-anniversary-passes-with-littlenote.html?pagewanted=all Burks, D. J. (2011). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual victimization in the military: An unintended consequence of “Don't Ask, Don't Tell”?. American Psychologist,66(7), 604. Dao, J. (2011, July 17). Same-sex marriage faces military limits. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/17/us/17military.html?pagewanted=all Kerrigan, M. (2012). Transgender discrimination in the military: The new don’t ask, don’t tell. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 18, 500-518. Pelts, M. D., Rolbiecki, A. J., & Albright, D. L. (2014). Wounded bonds: A review of the social work literature on gay, lesbian and bisexual military service members and veterans. Journal of Social Work, 1468017314548120. Sharpe, V. A., & Uchendu, U. S. (2014). Ensuring Appropriate Care for LGBT Veterans in the Veterans Health Administration. Hastings Center Report,44(s4), S53-S55. Swarns, R. (2012, November 16). Out of the closet and into the uniform. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/18/fashion/military-academies-adjusting-to-repeal-of-dont-askdont-tell.html?pagewanted=all Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment Muslims Ahmad, Z. S., Thoburn, J. W., Bikos, L. H., & Perry, K. L. (2014). The Experiences of Muslim American Military Personnel Serving in the US Military.Military Behavioral Health, 2(1), 67-74. Contable, P. (2014). Pentagon clarifies rules on beards, turbans for Muslim and Sikh service members. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/pentagon-clarifies-rules-onbeards-turbansfor-muslim-and-sikh-service-members/2014/01/22/13b1fc22-83a9-11e3-9dd4e7278db80d86_story.html Dreasin, Y. (2009). Muslim population in the military raises difficult issues. Wall Street Journal. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB125755853525335343 Elliott, A. (2009, November 9). Complications grow for Muslims serving in U.S. Military. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/09/us/09muslim.html?pagewanted=allmuslim-and-sikh-servicemembers/2014/01/22/13b1fc22-83a9-11e3-9dd4-e7278db80d86_story.html Military Internet Resources Air Force: http://www.military.com/Resources/ResourceSubmittedFileView?file=air_force_links.ht m Army Community Services: http://www.armycommunityservice.org/home.asp Army National Guard Readiness Program: http://www.arng.army.mil/soldier_resources/default.asp?id=37 Family Advocacy Program: http://www.bragg.army.mil/dv/ Military Family Resource Center: http://www.mfrc-dodqol.org/ Military Family Resources: http://www.2aces.com/endter/milfam.html Military One Source: http://www.militaryonesource.com/MOS.aspx Military Spouse Resource Center: http://www.milspouse.org/ National Center for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: http://www.ncptsd.va.gov/ncmain/index.jsp Dominican University Graduate School of Social Work SWK 853: Human Behavior in the Military Environment National Military Family Association: http://www.nmfa.org/