Executive Performance and Development Assessment 2014-15 Name: Department: Signature: *Supervisor Endorsement: *Recommended: Approval: Approved / Not Approved [Insert name] [Insert title] Date: [Supervisor name] [Position] Date: [Supervisor name] [Position] Date: [Chief Executive] Date: Comments: Comments: Comments: Comments: *Supervisors are asked to comment on how well the executive has met their expectations and the executive’s overall level of performance. Part 1: Performance Self-Assessment Performance Objectives Intended Outcomes (Information included in this table to be provided by the Executive) Evidence that the objective has been achieved Self Assessment Rating 1 to 5 Summary of achievements (Includes any issues in Mid-year check) Financial Perspective Services delivered within overall budget appropriation, including operating expenses, revenue and capital outlays 1. Fiscally responsible service delivery Value for money achieved through renewal of service delivery Stakeholder and Outcome Perspective 2. Renewed services delivering better outcomes for customers and stakeholders Rating Scale: Services renewed and re-prioritised to better meet customer and stakeholder needs Innovative service delivery models implemented through cross agency and cross sector collaboration and customer feedback 5 - Far exceeds expectations 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Requires development Performance Objectives Intended Outcomes Evidence that the objective has been achieved Self Assessment Rating 1 to 5 Summary of achievements (Includes any issues in Mid-year Check) Internal Business Perspective Strategies, plans, 3. policies, systems and Internal processes aligned to renewal agenda business operations Internal business renewed for operations streamlined to support a high improved performing service delivery organisation Learning and Growth Perspective 4. High performing, customerfocussed workforce Workplace culture and values aligned to deliver government renewal agenda Highly capable and high performing leaders Highly engaged and capable workforce Rating Scale: 5 - Far exceeds expectations 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Requires development Part 2: Personal Statements by Executive and Supervisor These statements should explain how the executive achieved their objectives. Executive statements should be no more than two pages and cover each of the four performance perspectives. Personal Statement by Executive Supervisor’s Comments Part 3: Performance Assessment This section is completed by the Supervisor/s, for consideration by the chief executive Performance Objectives Balanced Scorecard Perspective Performance Objectives Assessment Assessment Summary (Rationale for performance assessment rating) Rating (1-5) Weighting % Performance Score (rating x weighting) 10% /50 Financial Perspective 1. Fiscally responsible service delivery Stakeholder & Outcome Perspective 2. Renewed services delivering better outcomes for customers and stakeholders 40% /200 Internal Business Perspective Learning and Growth Perspective 3. Internal business operations renewed for improved service delivery 25% /125 4. High performing customer-focussed workforce 25% /125 Performance Score /500 Part 4: End-of-year Development Assessment (July 2015) The officer completes a traffic light self- assessment and summary of their development achievements; the supervisor completes a traffic light assessment and comments section. Development Priorities End of Year Development Assessment Development Objectives for 2014-15 Assessment (from Agreement) (traffic light) Vision # Officer’s summary of development achievements / Supervisor’s comments Officer: Supervisor: Results # Officer: Supervisor: Accountability # Officer: Supervisor: Other Officer: Supervisor: Traffic light development check: Strong development progress being made (green) Development ongoing (amber) Requires additional support (red)