Informational Compare/Contrast Essay Rubric B Name: ________________________________________ CATEGORY Introduction (Lead) 4 The introduction creatively invites and grabs the reader’s attention, states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper. Lead bridges thesis. 3 The introduction clearly states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper, grabbing the reader’s attention as well. Lead bridges thesis. Thesis Thesis clearly states the main idea and identifies what is being compared or contrasted but also uses sophisticated diction A strong topic sentence frames each body paragraph. The structure of each sentence is formal and grammatically correct. Relevant, impressive details give the reader important information that goes beyond the obvious or predictable. Thesis clearly states the main idea and identifies what is being compared or contrasted. Body Paragraphs (Commentary) Commentary explains how concrete details support topic sentence showing effective analysis and moving to synthesis. Commentary explains how concrete details support topic sentence showing effective analysis. Body Paragraphs (Sequencing) All details are placed in a logical order (TS, CD, CM) and the way they are presented effectively maintains the block or point-by-point structure Impressive transitions are used to connect the topic sentences to the thesis, concrete details to topic sentences/thesis, and commentary to concrete details/topic sentences/thesis. Body Paragraphs (Topic Sentences) Body Paragraphs (Concrete Details) Coherence (Transitions) Conclusion The conclusion is impressive: restates the thesis, summarizes the body of essay and leaves the reader with a synthesized statement. Score ______ Mastery Level ___ 2 The introduction states main topic, but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper and/or is particularly inviting to the reader. Weak bridge to thesis. Thesis underdevelops main idea and/or what is being compared or contrasted. 1 Introduction does not adequately state topic, preview the structure or grab reader’s attention. Weak or no bridge thesis. Thesis either states main idea or what is being compared or contrasted but not both. Topic sentences are weak and/or are missing from some paragraphs. 0 There is no clear introduction of the main topic or structure of the paper. No bridge. No thesis given. A topic sentence effectively frames each paragraph. The sentence is grammatically correct. Some topic sentences do not frame the paragraphs well. Relevant, specific details give the reader important information and are sufficient in quantity to fully support the thesis. Supporting details and information mostly support the thesis & are relevant. Some paragraphs need more details to develop the thesis. Commentary missing and/or underdeveloped for some concrete details. Some commentary may be irrelevant. Supporting details and information are weak or irrelevant and scattered throughout the piece. No relevant supporting details are given. Commentary is missing in sections, underdeveloped, and/or irrelevant. No commentary is given. All details are placed in a logical order which maintains the block or point-by-point structure Some details are not in a block or point-by-point order, and this distracts the reader. There is no evidence of organization of ideas. Effective transitions are used to connect the topic sentences to the thesis, concrete details to topic sentences/thesis, and commentary to concrete details/topic sentences/thesis. Transitions are used, but many do not effectively make connections between topic sentences and the thesis, and/or concrete details and topic sentences/thesis, and/or commentary and concrete details/topic sentences/thesis. The conclusion is missing some elements of essay but still ties up almost all the loose ends. Many details are not in a logical or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized. Few transitions are used to connect ideas or most transitions are ineffective. The conclusion is underdeveloped & missing 2 or more key components. It does not tie up several loose ends. There is no clear conclusion, the paper just ends. The conclusion is strong : restates the thesis, summarizes the body of essay and ties up all loose ends. No topic sentences are given for the body paragraphs. No transitions are used to connect ideas. Grammar and Usage The essay contains no errors in grammar or usage. The essay contains no errors in grammar or usage that distract the reader from the content. The essay contains 1-2 errors in grammar and/or usage that distract the reader from the content. Mechanics The essay contains no errors in capitalization, punctuation, or spelling. The essay contains no errors in capitalization, punctuation, or spelling that distract the reader from the content. The essay 1-2 errors in capitalization, punctuation, or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Sentence Structure Sentences are skillfully constructed. All sentences are wellconstructed. Sentence Variety Every paragraph uses an impressive variety of sentences. The writer uses appropriate MLA format for in-text citations and Works Cited page. No errors noted. Every paragraph has sentences that vary in length, type, & structure. The writer uses appropriate MLA format for in-text citations and Works Cited page, but essay contains one or two minor errors. Most sentences are wellconstructed, but the essay contains 1-2 fragments and/or run-on sentences that distract the reader from the content. Some paragraphs have sentences that vary in length, type, & structure. The writer attempts to use appropriate MLA format for in-text citations and Works Cited page, but essay contains several errors. MLA Citation The essay contains 3-4 errors in grammar and/or usage that distract the reader from the content. The essay 3-4 errors in capitalization, punctuation, or spelling that distract the reader from the content. The essay contains 3-4 fragments and/or run-on sentences that distract the reader from the content. Multiple errors in grammar and/or usage distract the reader from the content. Sentences rarely vary in length, type, or structure. The writer uses MLA format sparingly. Errors occur in one or more of the following areas documentation missing for some citations. documentation format is incorrect. works missing from Works Cited page. formatting errors on Works Cited page. No sentence variety. Multiple errors in capitalization, punctuation, or spelling distract the reader from the content. Multiple errors in sentence construction distract the reader from the content. The writer shows no understanding of MLA format for documentation.