Home Economics 2010 Work program review checklist — Revised July 2014 Panel code: A25 Subject code: 071 School: School code: District: Reviewer name: Date: 8/02/2016 Compiled by the Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority This form is used by panellists when reviewing work programs. It can also be useful for schools to use as a checklist to ensure that all work program requirements have been met. Instructions: Indicate Yes or No to the following statements. If your answer is No, please give specific examples of the problem in the Comments section. Course organisation The course organisation shows: Yes No Comments Time allocation for each unit of work, ensuring: the minimum requirement of 55 hours per semester 220 hours across four semesters Three areas of study evident across the course of study, with a minimum of two areas studied and assessed in Year 12 Key concepts progressively addressed Four to six units of work A minimum of two substantial units of work undertaken, one in Year 11 of at least 30 hours of timetabled school time and one in Year 12 of at least 40 hours r1624 The information you provide on this form will be used for reviewing work programs for quality assurance purposes as part of legislative functions described in Education (Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority) Act 2014 (s.14). Personal information will be accessed by authorised QCAA staff, including panel staff, and handled in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009. Outline of intended student learning The scope and depth of the student learning experiences in two sample units of work is demonstrated in: Yes No Comments Yes No Comments Substantial unit of work from Year 12, including: time allocation (in hours) demonstration of the objectives of the dimension(s) inclusion of key concepts, elective elements, where applicable and examples of subject matter Clear link between the issue and/or design challenge, learning experiences and assessment Clear articulation of the inquiry process in the learning experiences Assessment plan The assessment plan indicates: the area of study and key concepts the assessment technique (as outlined in syllabus Section 5.5), and whether formative or summative assessment instrument requirements as outlined in Section 5.5.1 for each assessment instrument each dimension is assessed in each semester each dimension is to make an equal contribution to the determination of exit levels of achievement a range of assessment techniques used under a range of conditions the verification folio requirements can be met by the inclusion of: all summative assessment a minimum of four and a maximum of six assessment instruments which come from at least two of the three areas of study in Year 12 each dimension assessed at least twice one supervised written assessment one research assessment that is either an essay or report one product assessment a student profile that: is consistent with the assessment plan shows global level of achievement for verification and exit and indicates timing of verification shows one assessment instrument post-verification indicates whether the assessment is formative or summative. Home Economics 2010 Work program review checklist — Revised Queensland Curriculum & Assessment Authority July 2014 Page 2 of 3 Additional comments Recommendation for approval Approved Not approved Action to be taken: Home Economics 2010 Work program review checklist — Revised Queensland Curriculum & Assessment Authority July 2014 Page 3 of 3