tpj12567-sup-0001-FigS1-S7

advertisement
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Debernardi et al.
Figure S1. GRF3 and GIF1 transcript levels.
a) GRF3 transcript levels estimated by RT-qPCR in wild-type and transgenic plants harboring
35S:miR396b, GRF3, rGRF3 vectors. Expression levels were normalized to wild-type plants.
Data shown are mean ± SEM of 3 biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant
differences as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (P <0.05).
b) GIF1 and GRF3 transcript levels estimated by RT-qPCR in wild-type plants and plants
harboring 35S:GIF1, rGRF3 or rGRF3x35S:GIF1 transgenes. Expression levels were
normalized to wild-type plants. Data shown are mean ± SEM of 3 biological replicates. Asterisks
mean significantly different from Col-0 applying the Student’s t-test (P <0.05).
Debernardi et al.
Functions of the miR396-GRF-GIF network
Figure S2. Genetic interaction between GIF1 and GRF5.
a) Area of fully expanded first leaves of wild-type (Col-0), RolD:GIF1 crossed with 35S:GRF5,
and heterozygous control plants. Error bars are SEM (n ≥ 14). Different letters indicate
significant differences as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (P <0.05).
b) Area of fully expanded first leaves of an3-4 and Col-0 plants transformed or not with a
35S:GRF5 vector. Error bars are SEM (n ≥ 14). Different letters indicate significant differences
as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (P <0.05).
c) GRF5 and GIF1 transcript levels determined by RT-qPCR in wild-type and plants transformed
with 35S:GRF5, RolD:GIF1 vectors, and an3-4 mutants transformed with 35S:GRF5.
Expression levels were normalized to wild-type plants. Data shown are mean ± SEM of 3
biological replicates. Asterisks mean significantly different from Col-0 applying the Student’s ttest (P <0.05). nd= non detected.
2
Debernardi et al.
Functions of the miR396-GRF-GIF network
Figure S3. Functions of GRF3 in the absence of GIF1.
a) Area of fully expanded first leaves of T1 S96 or an3-1 plants expressing rGRF3 from its own
promoter (n= 30).
b) Dark induced senescence in T1 plants (third leaves), after one and five days being in the
dark. Note that an3-1/rGRF3 leaves have smaller size than the control S96, but senescence
later.
Scale= 1cm.
c) GRF3 and GIF1 transcript levels estimated by RT-qPCR in selected T2 lines of an3-1 and
S96 plants transformed with rGRF3. Expression levels were normalized to wild-type plants.
Data shown are mean ± SEM of 3 biological replicates. Asterisks mean significantly different
from S96 applying the Student’s t-test (P <0.05). ND= non detected.
3
Debernardi et al.
Functions of the miR396-GRF-GIF network
Figure S4. Genes repressed by overexpression of GRF3 and/or GIF1.
a) Genes repressed in rGRF3, 35S:GIF1 and rGRF3x35S:GIF1 plants.
b) Genes repressed in (A) clustered according to their expression pattern.
4
Debernardi et al.
Functions of the miR396-GRF-GIF network
Figure S5. Leaf senescence of 35S:GRF5 plants and grf3 and grf5 mutants.
a) Wild-type (Col-0) and 35S:GRF5 50 day-old rosettes.
b) Measurements of photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) of PSII in detached leaves of wild-type,
35S:miR396b, and grf5-1 and grf3-1 mutant lines.
5
Debernardi et al.
Functions of the miR396-GRF-GIF network
Figure S6. Response of hormone regulated genes in 35S:GIF1, rGRF3 and
rGRF3x35S:GIF1 microarrays
a) Average log2 expression of hormone responsive gene lists in 35S:GIF1, rGRF3,
rGRF3x35S:GIF1 microarrays. A number at the top-left of the boxes indicates the number of
genes in each list. ACC, ethylene; CK, cytokinin; IAA, auxin, GA, gibberellin; BL, brassinolide;
6
Debernardi et al.
Functions of the miR396-GRF-GIF network
ABA, abscisic acid; Up genes up-regulated by the hormone; Down, genes down-regulated by
the hormone. See Nemhauser et al. (Cell 2006) for details
7
Debernardi et al.
Functions of the miR396-GRF-GIF network
Figure S7. Missexpression of GRF3.
a) GRF3 transcript levels estimated by RT-qPCR in apices of wild-type and selected T2 plants
transformed with rGRF3 (GRF3:rGRF3), AS1:rGRF3 and ANT:rGRF3 vectors. Expression
levels were normalized to wild-type plants. Data shown are mean ± SEM of 3 biological
replicates. Asterisks mean significantly different from Col-0 applying the Student’s t-test (P
<0.05).
b) Leaf area at different days after sowing (DAS) of the first leaves.
c) Cell area of mature first leaves.
8
Download