251 Notes Feb 19- From Gabby McHarg 2/25/2014 6:39:00 AM 2/19/14- 13th-c Notation Review of Rhythmic Modes (forms of performance practice largely associated with Notre Dame) (imposition of rhythm on repertory was performance practice- not written) Mode 1- trochaic (long-short) Mode 2- iambic (short-long) Mode 3- dactylic (long-short-long) Mode 4- anapestic (short-short-long) Mode 5-spondaic (long-long-long) Mode 6-tribrachic (short-short-short) Everything is in 3 which is often in part due to the trinity- 3 is a divine number and 2 is an earthly number Franconian Notation Named for Franco of Cologne (in Germany)- a German Music Theorist; was first to propose that the duration of a note should relate to its appearance on the page (by its shape and not just the context) (could represent some aspect of rhythm or meter in notation) Ars Cantus Mensurabilis (the art of singing mensural (reflects rhythm and meter in notation) music/measured music)– famous book by Franco- a practical guide for musicians with musical examples- very direct Covered in Ars Cantus Mensurabilis- organum, discant (rhythm indication in all voices), polyphony, conductus (one voice carries rhythm and chant voice is not rhythmcized), clausulae (excerpts from chant), all compositional techniques of 13th century in Notre Dame school. Rhythmic modes are in detail Rhythm is represented in writing rather than being performance practice- that’s kind of a huge idea to come up for the first time; Franco says rhythms can be conveyed by shape The performance practice system stayed in place for a good while, but gradually over time music theory went in the direction of the Franconian system Consensus date of most medieval music theory scholars on the ars cantus mesurabilis is about 1250 (know this)- there’s a lot going on in music theory right now Franconian Notation pictures on her page; double long is an indication of rhythm (kind of a double square with a stem) a long (half as big with stem), breve (no stem; just one stem), semibreve (diamond shape) these are Franco’s 4 rhythm values however they can mean different things and are based on context; breve is the primary note of measure Basic unit of time is tempus plural=tempora Tempus is represented by the breve a “perfect” long is 3 breves and an “imperfect” long is 2 breves/tempora (perfection is about the heavens and the holy trinity and imperfect is not) a double long is always imperfect (two longs) breve is almost always one tempus, but under certain conditions can be two tempora rather than one and in this case is called an “altered” breve (this would be gotten from the context/performance practice) semibreves can be a lesser semibreve (1/3 value of tempus) or greater semibreve (2/3 value of tempus); two semibreves will never equal a breve in the 13th century no ties across the bar line- you have to complete a unit within a tempus the table is converted to modern notation and is just good for this table- a long is not always going to be a dotted half note so in order to fit it all in the tempus/a perfection, perfect and imperfect and altered things happen (so, based on context) and the chart shows how these changes happen based on the number of breves know- Franco of Cologne devised a system using shapes of notes on a page to show rhythm that worked with rhythmic modes to provide instructions to singers about how to sing polyphony notes related by groupings of 3- triple groupings After Franco, Petrus de Cruce of France- worked in Paris and was part of the Notre Dame circle of composers, singers, theorists Goes to the University of Paris- where there are classes in music theory; his title magister indicates his probable education Probably was Franco’s student Mensural notation means you can tell something about rhythm in the piece By 1280s, tripla (plural for triplum) moved more rapidly and independently than before- became more rhythmically active and the chant voices were becoming less so (lowest voice becomes slower and not really participate as much and the uppermost voice to be more rapid and the voice that drives the counterpoint) more differentiation of voices and at the same time the notational practice did not involve scoring up the voices because that’s a waste of sheepskin and ink for a tenor voice that would be note and then lots and lots of space before next note; so each voice was written out on a different part of the page. So you need rhythmic notation so you can put the voices together in performance Petrus was innovative and sometimes divided his breves into as many as 7 semibreves- wanted smaller note values to play with in his compositions and he wanted to not have just one interpretation of groupings of 3 So he introduced the dot of division- which meant in Petronian notation that the division comes between two notes- a dot is used to indicate that a perfection need to end there Perfection= grouping of 3 Petronian innovation chart on page- compare how this looks to how Franconian notation would have interpreted the same 3 shapes- the dot shows which are imperfect; however, the dots are often redundant- information you knew already based on Franconian notation- but not always This has huge implications for musical style because it gave composers more control over rhythm over pieces and took a lot of that control away from the singers Tripla start to become more important and tenors start to become less important; and tempus started to become a more rapid unit of time (so rather than the tenor notes dictating the time for the piece, the tripulum started to take on that role)