UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS LONDON EXTERNAL EXAMINER REPORT FORM Name of External Examiner: Andre Pinkowski College: Ravensbourne If acting as a Mentor, state to whom Course: (e.g. BA Fine Art, and where appropriate, pathway): BA Digital Photography Academic Year (e.g 2011/2012): 2014 This is your report on the course examined in the standard format required by the Academic Standards and Development Committee of the University of the Arts London. As well as being seen by the relevant academic and administrative staff at the University, this report will be made available internally, and to the University community (including students), via the Quality Information Intranet site. Therefore anyone with access to University IT facilities will be able to read it. Copies of this report will also be made available, if requested, under the Freedom of Information Act but will first be subjected to scrutiny to ensure that no information which can be construed as personal data is included. In accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998, information included within the report relating to named individual students or members of staff will also be made available to those individuals if requested by them but may be conveyed in summary form.* FULL REPORT This report will be seen by academic and administrative staff at the University, will be made available internally, and to the University community, via the Quality Information Intranet site. 1. Administration Were the following administrative arrangements satisfactory and was the following information provided to you? (a) Annual Monitoring Report (b) External Examiner Briefing (c) Course Handbook (d) Assessment briefs (e) Arrangements for meetings and Examination Boards Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes x x x x x No No No No No If you indicated ‘no’ to any of the above, please add any additional comments: (Write a maximum of 100 words) If this is your first year please indicate whether you received the following: Yes No (f) External Examiner Handbook (g) Previous external examiner report (h) A formal induction to your role as an External Examiner at the University (h) Details of your mentor (if relevant) (j) If you were allocated a Mentor, please provide a brief overview of the support you received below Yes Yes No No Yes No If you indicated ‘no’ to any of the above, please add any additional comments: (Write a maximum of 100 words) 2. Assessment Standards Please comment on the quality and standards of the assessment process, drawing particular attention to: (a) internal marking; (b) internal moderation; (c) the conduct of the Examination Board. Overall, in your view, has the process of assessment been soundly and fairly conducted? (Normally write between 100- 200 words) For this years visit a cross section of marks and feedback was presented of the following modules: DGP11202 / C202 - Marketing Strategy DGP11204 / C204 - Promotions and Advertising DGP11205 - Documentary Photography and Photojournalism DGP11206 - Advanced Commercial Photography DGP11207 - Motion Photography DGP11208 - Genres: Human and Inanimate Form DGP11302 / C302 - Enterprise and Entrepreneurship: Making it Happen DGP11303/C303 - Major Project Report DGP11304 - Location and Studio DGP11305 - Live Project DGP11306 - Major Project DGP11307 - Self Initiated The given feedback for all modules was always critical and additional support is offered if needed. The feedback reflects on the assessed elements and a good band of marks was used throughout. The learning outcomes were clearly stated (and understood by the students) and assessed appropriately. All work presented had been internally verified within the teaching team, and seemed to be rigorous, fair and consistent. 3. Student Performance Please comment on: (a) particular strengths and weaknesses revealed during your involvement in the assessment process (but do not mention individual students by name); (b) the distribution of marks; (c) whether student performance is comparable to similar courses in your experience. (Normally write between 100- 200 words) Having two shows to present the final 3rd year work might have put extra pressure on students. The event at Brick Lane was a great success and should also help to showcase the excellent work produced to a much wider audience. Overall, the work produced by students matches that of other institutions and students are very well prepared for their life after graduation. The confidence and knowledge gained throughout the course will be beneficial when finding their feet in a professional world. The content delivered over the three years matches the needs in professional photographic industries. 4. Appropriateness of Assessment Please comment upon appropriateness of the assessments. In particular: (a) were the assessment requirements appropriate to the level of the award, and (b) did the assessment methods allow each student to demonstrate achievement of the learning outcomes (Normally write between 100- 200 words) The assessment of all modules mentioned above is appropriate and allows for deeper learning. Students with varying strength achieved the learning outcomes and strength as well as possible improvements are visible to the student. The feedback was always positive, critical and constructive and student understand the rigour of the assessment, the assessment criteria and are able to improve their work within the three years. 5. Quality Enhancement of the Student Experience In your opinion, within its stated aims and outcomes, what recommendations would you make that could enhance and improve the student experience of this course (Normally write between 100- 200 words) The course found its unique position within photography education within the last 4 years. Staff (technical and academic) are passionate and dedicated as mentioned by a lot of students. Extra curricular activities (i.e. 24h) are very well received and benefit the cohort. The increase in student numbers over the last three years demonstrates this strength, but it must be matched by an increase in resources, staff and support. The limited dedicated spaces for photography (i.e. professional studios, printing facilities, etc) might dampen the student experience. The course manages successfully to link with external professional photographic industries and this should be continued as much as possible, even with bigger cohorts. 6. Any Other Comments Please give comments on any matter(s) not raised elsewhere that you feel would be helpful arising from the assessments and the assessment process. (if you choose to make any comments, normally write between 100- 200 words) 7. Account Taken of Previous Comments If you have acted as an External Examiner for this course before, are you satisfied that the comments made in your previous report have been adequately considered. (Normally write between 100- 200 words) Yes, the discussions held and comments by myself were all considered and the course leader and course staff constantly review the course, its strength as well as its position with the wider photographic community. 8. Overview of your tenure If this is your final year please give us a brief overview of your tenure as an External Examiner for the University1. (Normally write between 100- 200 words) As this is my final year as External Examiner at Ravensbourne, some reflective comments on my tenure over the last four years. The successful increase in student numbers demonstrates the attractiveness of the course and its position in photographic education within London. As the course is only in its 5th year this should be considered a great success. Staff teaching on the course have always been highly respected by the students, and go to great lengths to ensure that all students have a good learning experience during their time at the college. Work was always assessed with rigour, fairness and consistency. Staff have encouraged students to experiment which has led to some highly creative and successful work and a lot of the students found their professional role within photography after graduating. When completed, please return this pro forma electronically to: Philip Broadhead Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Academic at: examiners@arts.ac.uk * The University of the Arts London acknowledges the University of Surrey for this disclaimer. 1 The overview of your tenure is a requirement of QAA UK Quality Code for Higher Education on external examining and will be useful for both the University and the replacement external examiner