Guidance for marking scripts with ‘sympathetic consideration for spelling and grammar’ Purpose of these guidelines: To offer a practical aid to help lecturers when marking the work of a student who has been identified as having a Specific Learning Difficulty (SpLD), such as dyslexia. Academic standards: Course Directors and Module Co-ordinators are not being asked to lower or undermine their academic standards by making accommodations for students with a SpLD. The key challenge is to identify what is being assessed in each piece of coursework/exam question and to make reasonable adjustments to areas that are not absolutely necessary for the assessment process. It is, therefore, essential that markers of any given script are clear about the objectives and the learning outcomes of an assignment/exam question. These guidelines should be used alongside the marking criteria for the course, but not supersede it in respect to core competencies. Assessing competence in language or spelling: Where competence with language is being actively assessed, or where correct use and spelling of certain vocabulary is required, it is up to academic staff to demonstrate why this is so. Lecturers should seek clarification from colleagues and/or professional bodies if they are unsure to what extent use of language and spelling is crucial to the marking of an assignment/exam question. In some cases, accurate spelling, grammar or structure may form explicit parts of assessment. Programmes of study that require students to demonstrate that they have a certain level of competency in aspects of reading, writing and translation (in either English or a foreign language) and where grammar and spelling are core competencies of a course, a student’s work must be marked on the basis of accuracy in the language and therefore this advice will not apply. Information for students: Students need to be made aware of expectations for any given piece of coursework/exam. It is also crucial that students are told how many marks they may lose because of errors. Guidance notes: When it is accepted that the use of language and spelling is not a crucial to the marking of an assignment/exam paper and will not affect learning outcomes, the following guidance can be given: Markers should discount, as far as possible, errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation and instead mark for content, ideas and critical acumen. Mark for content and information rather than spelling. Do not discredit poor handwriting. Version 1.0 December 2013 Written work should be marked with an emphasis on assessing ideas, understanding and knowledge of the topic. Markers should make allowances for unorthodox narratives and for problems with organisation, where these do not hinder understanding. Mark for ideas and knowledge rather than presentation, with the intention of giving credit for the student’s achievements in meeting the learning outcomes, by focusing on the content and understanding of the topic rather than concentrating on written expression. The grammatical construction or written style of expression may obscure the clarity of the student’s ideas. In these cases, decide whether the intended content can be understood and give credit accordingly for this aspect of the work. Always assume that the student does not wish other students to know about their SpLD and never make comments about a student’s SpLD or the support they are getting in a public setting. Many students with a SpLD have experienced negative reactions to having dyslexia and prefer not to disclose to others. Markers would normally provide detailed feedback to all students for coursework. This is particularly important for students with s SpLD. It is worth commenting on where the student has done well and explain why some work is good. Comments will be most effective if they are clear explanations of what is required and what is wrong. It would help the student improve future performance if examples can be given of how a point can be developed - explain how the work could be improved. Be explicit about specific problems so that the student can see a way forward. Be supportive and positive. Procedure: This guidance is relevant to: • All submitted written work, examination or test scripts that are produced by a student who you have been informed has an SpLD, such as dyslexia, and • You have been advised by Disability Services, via a Reasonable Adjustments Recommendations (RAR) email (which is sent to Course Directors and Heads of School), that is recommended that the student should receive sympathetic consideration for their written work. This guidance focuses on students with SpLDs, such as dyslexia; however, on occasion, the recommendation is made for students who have a brain injury or for someone who is deaf and has language acquisition difficulties. Version 1.0 December 2013 For the purpose of anonymous marking, the student will be advised to attach a ‘sticker’ to an assignment or examination script, stating: For the attention of the marker This coursework/examination script has been written by a student with dyslexia. Please mark with sympathetic consideration for errors of spelling and grammar. To validate the use of such ‘stickers’, markers can access a list of the B00 numbers for students entitled to such dispensation, from their School and/or the Course Director. Markers can then cross reference to ensure that students using the stickers are entitled to such a reasonable adjustment. Why is ‘consideration’ given to students with a SpLD ? It is not intended that students with SpLDs receive favourable treatment, are placed at an advantage over their peers, or that the academic standards within the University are lowered. Students with SpLDs, such as dyslexia, often require reasonable adjustments to the standard assessment procedures (such as their scripts being marked with sympathetic consideration for poor spelling and grammar) in recognition of the University’s obligations under the Special Educational Needs and Disability (NI) Order 2005 (as amended). Students with SpLD, such as dyslexia Dyslexia is a hidden disability that affects approximately 10% of the population to varying degrees. Dyslexia is best thought of as a continuum, not a distinct category, and there are no clear cut-off points. Dyslexia occurs across the range of intellectual abilities and is not an indication of intelligence, or lack thereof Each student is an individual and so it is important to recognise that the effects and impact of having a SpLD, such as dyslexia, will vary, both in nature and severity, from student to student. Students with SpLDs, such as dyslexia, may have difficulty with one, several, or all of the following: Spelling: erratic and inconsistent spelling; inappropriate use of phonetic spelling choices; telescoping polysyllabic words; misuse of homophones; letter reversals; using basic, easily spelt vocabulary that does not reflect their true range of vocabulary; persistent or severe problems with spelling. Punctuation and grammar: misuse or omission of punctuation marks; failure to identify sentence boundaries, with possible overuse of conjunctions; short, unsophisticated sentences lacking complexity; long rambling sentences; inappropriate grammatical constructions. Structuring assignments/essays: difficulties can exist at the level of both sentences and paragraphs, leading to a repetition of information in different parts of the work and a failure to develop a sustained and detailed discussion; there can be unusual links between topics that reflect a student’s lateral and Version 1.0 December 2013 creative thinking skills but do not meet the learning outcomes; scripts can lack logical sequencing of ideas. Handwritten scripts: untidy, immature handwriting; inability to use cursive style; confusion of visually similar letters; misuse of capital letters; words omitted, especially in situations with pressures of time or stress, such as exams. Recalling rote information. Organising work - poor general presentation skills. Expressing ideas in a conventional academic style of writing. Identifying and including only relevant information. Adhering to recommended word limits. Proof reading Further information: University of Ulster Disability Services http://www.studentsupport.ulster.ac.uk/disability/disability.html The Higher Education Academy: Dyslexia and Higher Education: Accessibility Issues Sharon Lockley http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/resources/database/id416_dyslexia _and_higher_education.pdf British Dyslexia Association http://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk Dyslexia Action http://dyslexiaaction.org.uk Association of Dyslexia Specialists in Higher Education http://adshe.org.uk AchieveAbility: Breaking barriers to higher education for students with specific learning difficulties http://www.achieveability.org.uk Version 1.0 December 2013