A Report of the Honors Program Workgroup

advertisement
An Evaluation and Investigation of
Honors Education
at SUNY Oneonta and Comparable Institutions
A Report of the Honors Program Workgroup
February, 2014
1
Table of Contents
I.
Preamble: The Value of a Distinctive Honors Program ..................................................... 3
II.
The Formation and Charge of the SUNY Oneonta Honors Program Workgroup .............. 3
III.
A Brief History of the Honors Education at SUNY-Oneonta............................................. 4
IV.
Best Practices for Honors Programs ................................................................................... 6
V.
Summary of the Structure, Resource Needs, and Goals of Honors Programs at Peer
Institutions........................................................................................................................... 8
SUNY Cortland Honors Program .................................................................................... 8
SUNY Geneseo Honors Program .................................................................................... 9
SUNY Fredonia Honors Program .................................................................................... 9
SUNY New Paltz Honors Program.................................................................................. 9
VI.
Nationally Recognized Honors Programs ......................................................................... 10
VII.
Summary ........................................................................................................................... 11
VIII.
Appendices ........................................................................................................................ 12
Appendix A. SUNY Honors Programs Information Summary 2013 .......................... 12
Appendix B - Details Regarding Top National Honors Programs ................................ 14
1. University of South Carolina .....................................................................................14
2. University of Michigan ..............................................................................................14
3. U of Texas at Austin ..................................................................................................14
4. Arizona State University (Barrett Honors College) ...................................................15
2
I.
Preamble: The Value of a Distinctive Honors Program
“The value of Honors programs and Honors colleges for students cannot be
overemphasized. For high achieving students, Honors programs and colleges offer
many opportunities to make the most of their higher education. For the bright and
talented students, participating in an Honors program provides the challenges
necessary to stay motivated and stimulated. Honors education promotes lifelong
learning through personal engagement, intellectual involvement, and a sense of
community.”1
Other benefits of having a well-designed distinctive honors program include:

Enhances the reputation of the institution

Supports the mission and core values of the College

Increases opportunities for fund-raising

Increases opportunities to develop mutually beneficial relationships with public and
private entities

Increases the competitiveness of SUNY Oneonta students for graduate school
admissions and throughout their career

Increases the competitiveness of the College to continue to recruit and retain talented
faculty

Increases the competitiveness of the institution to continue to recruit and retain
talented students

Most importantly, it provides talented, motivated students with a membership in a community
that provides challenging, high-impact, and engaging interdisciplinary learning opportunities
and experiences
II.
The Formation and Charge of the SUNY Oneonta Honors Program Workgroup
The SUNY Oneonta Honors Program Workgroup was formed November, 2013 by the
College Senate after consultation with the College Senate Steering Committee. Members of
the workgroup responded to a call made to the campus community for volunteers to join the
effort to re-establish an honors program at the college.
1
National Collegiate Honors Council. The Value of Honors Programs. http://nchchonors.org/nchc-students/thevalue-of-honors-programs/
3
Members of the SUNY Oneonta Honors Workgroup;










Michael Green, Professor, Philosophy
Allen Farber, Associate Professor, Art
Paul Bischoff, Professor, Education
William Proulx, Associate Professor, Human Ecology
Elizabeth Small, Associate Professor, Foreign Languages
Lesley Bidwell, Director of Networking and Telecommunications Services
Rose Piacente, Admissions
Karen Munson, College Advancement
Selina Policar, Undergraduate Student, Communications
Nick Moore, Undergraduate Student, Business
The workgroup was charged by the College Senate Steering Committee with the
following:
1.
Briefly research the history of honors programs at SUNY Oneonta to determine how
they were structured, what was successful, and what may have led to their decline.
2.
Identify a variety of models of best practices in honors programs.
3.
Examine the structure, resource needs, and goals of honors programs at institutions
with academic missions similar to Oneonta.
A date of February 24, 2014 was set for the workgroup to present its findings to the College
Senate.
III.
A Brief History of the Honors Education at SUNY-Oneonta
According to Carey W. Brush, In Honor and Good Faith: Completing the First Century,
1965-1990, p. 373:
The SUCO honors program faced many difficulties in the eighties as budget
and staffing reductions cut into the core academic programs. When Alan
Schramm resigned as director in the early eighties, Pat Gourlay of the
English Department succeeded him. One of her main tasks was to make the
program more cohesive. To this end, she developed a Colloquium in
Renaissance Studies for the Spring 1984 semester. In subsequent semesters,
there were similar programs. Faculty members usually contributed their time
as an overload. The main part of the program was still additional work in
specified courses. After two or three years, Gourlay stepped down, and
Allen Farber of the Art Department succeeded her. The combined efforts of
Gourlay and Farber resulted in strengthening the honors program so that by
4
1987 it had an eighteen-credit core, consisting of three credits each in an
Honors Literature and Composition course, Honors Thesis Research, and
Honors Thesis Writing, plus nine additional credits from a total of three
Interdisciplinary Colloquia. A Catalog note said that recent Colloquia titles
had been “Medieval Mentalities,” “The Golden Age in Greece,” “European
Civilization in the Era of WWI,” and “Romantic Revolution.” Successful
completion of the honors program was noted on the student's transcript.
Despite its problems in developing a cohesive honors program, Oneonta was
one of only five SUNY Arts and Science Colleges to have a program. It
differed also from others by being open to all students and by the contract
arrangement to receive honors credit for additional work in regular courses.
Dr. Allen Farber followed Pat Gourlay as Director of the Honors Program and worked to
build an honors program around a core of interdisciplinary colloquia. Under the direction of
Pat Gourlay, the honors colloquia started as one-semester hour additions to existing classes.
The first class was dedicated to Greek culture and drew students from existing, regularly
taught literature, history, philosophy, and art history classes. The colloquium met once every
other week in the evening. Honors faculty would participate in working lunches each week
in preparation for the next week's seminar, and many felt these were some of the most
rewarding experiences they had as a faculty member. The success of these first classes led to
the development of stand-alone three-semester hour evening classes. Colloquia included
topics such as The Impact of Darwin's Theory of Evolution, The Scientific Revolution, the
French Revolution, and the World of Late Antiquity, and included faculty from as many
relevant departments as possible. These honors classes attracted faculty and students from a
variety of different disciplines and helped define a community dedicated to the enhanced
academic experiences provided by an honors program. One of the goals of the SUNY
Oneonta Honors Program was to give honors students a sense of connection and identity
with other similarly academically motivated students. Faculty involved with the honors
program valued the experience because it connected them with students and colleagues from
a variety of departments, thereby breaking down the insularity of the traditional
departmental structures. After a couple of years of teaching the stand-alone seminars, the
Honors Degree Program was created with an 18-semester hour requirement that included
participation in the honors seminars and the writing of an honors thesis. The strength and
weakness of the program was directly connected to the willingness of faculty to participate.
While Provost Carey Brush granted a course release to the Director and the faculty member
responsible for coordinating the individual seminar, the remaining faculty participated on a
volunteer basis. Attempts to have departments commit resources to the program were
largely futile. The 18-credit honors program lasted four years, but the lack of institutional
support made the program unsustainable.
In the mid-late 1990s, Virginia Harder was the director of the Honors program. Each
student in the program went through the program independently. Dr. Harder had to
negotiate a set of independent studies for each student. An independent study could mean
taking a regularly scheduled course with enriched content, such as a research project. The
difficulty in making these arrangements had the result that very few students, in some years
only one and in others none, completed the program.
5
The current 30-credit honors program at SUNY Oneonta was launched in the early 2000s.
Around 1999, Dr. Larkin asked the Committee on Instruction, of which Dr. William O’Dea
was Chair, to devise a new Honors program. The Committee on Instruction created the
current 30-credit Honors program in which students take six honors versions of general
education courses (18 credit hours) in their freshman and sophomore years. In their junior
year, they take one team-taught interdisciplinary course each semester (6 credit hours), and
the senior year they take a six-credit hour seminar that meets during the fall and spring
semesters. As part of the seminar, each student would complete and present a research
project or, for students in the arts, the equivalent under the direction of a faculty mentor.
The resources available to the Honors program consisted of a Director and an Honors
Program Advisory Committee. There were a very limited number of honors courses available
to students, and most students in the program chose to leave the program.
IV.
Best Practices for Honors Programs
The National Collegiate Honors Council (NCHC) has identified the following as best
practices of fully developed honors programs.2
1. The honors program offers carefully designed educational experiences that meet the
needs and abilities of the undergraduate students it serves. A clearly articulated set of
admission criteria (e.g., GPA, SAT score, a written essay, satisfactory progress, etc.)
identifies the targeted student population served by the honors program. The program
clearly specifies the requirements needed for retention and satisfactory completion.
2. The program has a clear mandate from the institution’s administration in the form of a
mission statement or charter document that includes the objectives and
responsibilities of honors and defines the place of honors in the administrative and
academic structure of the institution. The statement ensures the permanence and
stability of honors by guaranteeing that adequate infrastructure resources, including
an appropriate budget as well as appropriate faculty, staff, and administrative support
when necessary, are allocated to honors so that the program avoids dependence on the
good will and energy of particular faculty members or administrators for survival. In
other words, the program is fully institutionalized (like comparable units on campus)
so that it can build a lasting tradition of excellence.
3. The honors director reports to the chief academic officer of the institution.
4. The honors curriculum, established in harmony with the mission statement, meets the
needs of the students in the program and features special courses, seminars, colloquia,
2
Basic Characteristics of Fully Developed Honors Programs. National Collegiate Honors Council.
http://nchchonors.org/faculty-directors/basic-characteristics-of-a-fully-developed-honors-program/
6
experiential learning opportunities, undergraduate research opportunities, or other
independent-study options.
5. The program requirements constitute a substantial portion of the participants’
undergraduate work, typically 20% to 25% of the total course work and certainly no
less than 15%.
6. The curriculum of the program is designed so that honors requirements can, when
appropriate, also satisfy general education requirements, major or disciplinary
requirements, and pre-professional or professional training requirements.
7. The program provides a locus of visible and highly reputed standards and models of
excellence for students and faculty across the campus.
8. The criteria for selection of honors faculty include exceptional teaching skills, the
ability to provide intellectual leadership and mentoring for able students, and support
for the mission of honors education.
9. The program is located in suitable, preferably prominent, quarters on campus that
provide both access for the students and a focal point for honors activity. Those
accommodations include space for honors administrative, faculty, and support staff
functions as appropriate. They may include space for an honors lounge, library,
reading rooms, and computer facilities. If the honors program has a significant
residential component, the honors housing and residential life functions are designed
to meet the academic and social needs of honors students.
10. The program has a standing committee or council of faculty members that works with
the director or other administrative officer and is involved in honors curriculum,
governance, policy, development, and evaluation deliberations. The composition of
that group represents the colleges and/or departments served by the program and also
elicits support for the program from across the campus.
11. Honors students are assured a voice in the governance and direction of the honors
program. This can be achieved through a student committee that conducts its business
with as much autonomy as possible but works in collaboration with the administration
and faculty to maintain excellence in the program. Honors students are included in
governance, serving on the advisory/policy committee as well as constituting the
group that governs the student association.
12. Honors students receive honors-related academic advising from qualified faculty
and/or staff.
13. The program serves as a laboratory within which faculty feel welcome to experiment
with new subjects, approaches, and pedagogies. When proven successful, such efforts
in curriculum and pedagogical development can serve as prototypes for initiatives
that can become institutionalized across the campus.
7
14. The program engages in continuous assessment and evaluation and is open to the
need for change in order to maintain its distinctive position of offering exceptional
and enhanced educational opportunities to honors students.
15. The program emphasizes active learning and participatory education by offering
opportunities for students to participate in regional and national conferences, Honors
Semesters, international programs, community service, internships, undergraduate
research, and other types of experiential education.
16. When appropriate, two-year and four-year programs have articulation agreements by
which honors graduates from two-year programs who meet previously agreed-upon
requirements are accepted into four-year honors programs.
17. The program provides priority enrollment for active honors students in recognition of
scheduling difficulties caused by the need to satisfy both honors and major
program(s) requirements.
V.
Summary of the Structure, Resource Needs, and Goals of Honors Programs at
Peer Institutions
To fulfill its charge the SUNY Oneonta Honors Program Workgroup reviewed honors
programs at peer institutions. SUNY System Administration compiled a summary of Honors
programs at 25 SUNY campuses (Appendix A). Nine of the programs listed in the summary
are University Colleges. Four are reviewed below.
SUNY Cortland Honors Program
http://www2.cortland.edu/academics/undergraduate/honors/index.dot
According to their website: “The SUNY Cortland Honors Program provides students who
have demonstrated academic excellence with the opportunity for continued intellectual
challenge in a rigorous, coherent and integrative program,” and “The program provides a
mechanism for students to distinguish themselves and also enhances the general learning
environment for all students and faculty, the College and the community.”
 Students must maintain a 3.2 average.
 The program requires 24 credit hours in a variety of honors level courses (seminar
classes reserved for honors students, contract courses, specially designated writing
intensive courses)
 Students complete a thesis in their major.
8
SUNY Geneseo Honors Program
http://www.geneseo.edu/edgarfellows
Some departments allow students to write Honors theses, but the college-wide program is the
Edgar Fellows Program. According to their website, “the Edgar Fellows Program is
designed to enhance the academic experience of a small number of especially dedicated and
accomplished students through specially designed seminar courses, research opportunities,
close work with program advisors, and co-curricular activities,” and “in the spirit of its
founder, the Program values and fosters critical inquiry and the lively interchange of ideas
between and among students and faculty.”
 Students must maintain a 3.4 average.
 First year students will complete HONR 101 & 202, then completing at least one
course each year until all five core courses are completed (8 total courses are offered,
not including the capstone experience).
 Students must maintain at least a 3.0 average each semester.
 Seniors must complete a capstone experience: thesis paper, presentation and Capstone
Seminar. This experience is done over the course of 2 semesters.
SUNY Fredonia Honors Program
http://www.fredonia.edu/Honors/
The Fredonia Honors Program website emphasizes challenging and supporting student
learning, and participation in unique opportunities in and out of the classroom. The learning
objectives for the program include to “explore multiple disciplinary approaches to problem
solving.”
 Students take one honors seminar class per semester for two years (total of four
seminars).
 Most students will complete these between freshman and junior years.
Seniors “can also complete a thesis within the Honors Program if they so choose.”
SUNY New Paltz Honors Program
http://www.newpaltz.edu/honors/
According to their website, “The mission of the SUNY New Paltz Honors Program is to
provide an enhanced intellectual experience in a climate conducive to interaction among
highly motivated students and faculty. This experience will seek to develop and intensify
skills from a conceptual point of view in a diverse multidisciplinary analytical environment
that nurtures independent thinking, creativity, respect and social responsibility.”
 Students must take a minimum of four seminar classes over their four years
 All seminars, with the exception of one, fulfill General Education requirements and
are upper divisional classes.
9


VI.
Students must complete forty hours of community service prior to graduation.
All students must complete a senior thesis or project , to be presented at a public
forum.
Nationally Recognized Honors Programs
Below are some honors programs that have been recognized nationally for their excellence;
further details of selected institutions appear in Appendix B. Though these institutions differ
from SUNY Oneonta in their size and mission, there may be some benefit from studying
these successful programs.
The first list below shows the programs that scored the highest when the following criteria
were used to evaluate overall excellence: honors curriculum; prestigious undergraduate and
postgraduate scholarships of the university as a whole; honors retention and graduation rates;
honors housing; study-abroad programs; and priority registration. Large programs with more
than 1,700 honors students also received bonus points for strong performance in curriculum,
scholarships, and retention and graduation rates. Retention and graduation rates were
estimated when no data was received from universities. The criteria for Overall Excellence
are as follows:
a) Honors curriculum as an estimated percentage of the graduation requirement=35%;
b) Honors graduation rates, actual or estimated, 6-yr, freshman entrants only=20%;
c) A metric for honors residence halls that emphasizes location and room styles=10%;
d) Study-abroad programs for the university as a whole or for honors only=7.5%;
e) The availability of priority registration for honors students=2.5%.
See more at: http://publicuniversityhonors.com/methodology/#sthash.pN5uR5JV.dpuf
The leading public university honors programs in OVERALL EXCELLENCE are the
following:
1. University of Michigan
2. University of Virginia
3. UT Austin
4. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
5. Arizona State University
This next list shows programs according to their HONORS FACTORS only, meaning that
the university-wide data for prestigious scholarships are not included:
1. University of South Carolina
2. University of Michigan
3. UT Austin
4. Arizona State University
5. University of Georgia
10
See more at:
http://publicuniversityhonors.com/2012/03/23/tophonors/programs/#sthash.qSCiL
Ubg.dpuf
VII.
Summary
The following represents the findings of the SUNY Oneonta Honors Program Workgroup:




A well-designed distinctive Honors program that incorporates best practice confers
numerous tangible benefits to students, faculty, and the institution
The National Collegiate Honors Council has identified the best practices of fully
developed Honors programs
The success and sustainability of Honors programs requires the full support of
administration, academic departments, and faculty
SUNY and Private Peer institutions have established Honors programs
Item 6 on the NCHC list of best practices emphasizes that “The curriculum of the program is
designed so that honors requirements can, when appropriate, also satisfy general education
requirements, major or disciplinary requirements, and pre-professional or professional
training requirements.” The essence of item 6 is that all talented, motivated students who
meet the criteria to participate an honors program should be able to do so regardless of their
major. However, students in highly-structured programs often find it difficult, if not
impossible to integrate any honors coursework into their curriculum that doesn’t apply
directly towards their program-specific graduation requirements. Consequently, the
participation and contribution of academic departments in an institution’s honor program is
essential for providing talented, motivated students in highly structured majors the
opportunity to participate in a structured honors experience and join the honors community at
the institution.
The members of the Honors Program Workgroup look forward to contributing to the ongoing
discussion of the future of Honors education at SUNY Oneonta.
11
VIII.
Appendices
Honors
enrollment
SAT
combined
ACT
composite
H.S. GPA
Scholarshi
ps
Contact
12,875
125
450
1330
30
95-99
Y
Jeffrey
Haugaard
518.442.9067
Binghamton
University at
Buffalo
12,356
100
215
1400-1580
32-35
96-99
Y
Y
William
607.777.3583
19,506
325
1,060
1320-1420
29-33
95-99
Krista
Ziegler
Hanypsia
k
Stony Brook
University
Colleges
16,003
462
1,569
1350-1470
30-33
94-99
Ryan
Donelly
631.632.6867
Brockport
7,133
90
451
1240-1300
27-29
94-97
Y
Donna
Kowal
585.395.5400
Cortland
6,300
32
165
1200-1300
26-28
92-98
N
Lisi
Krall
607.753.4827
Fredonia
5,232
105
260
1190-1300
26-30
93-96
Y
David
Kinkela
716.673.3876
Geneseo
4,950
40
160
1390-1460
29-36
95-99
Y
Olympia
Nicodemi
585.245.5390
New Paltz
Old
Westbury
6,685
30
150
1280
28
95
N
Patricia
Sullivan
845.257.3456
4,413
40
135
1100-1200
24-27
90-95
Y
Anthony
DeLuca
516.876.3177
Oswego
7,300
80
225
1200-1300
26-29
93-96
Y
Robert
315.312.2190
Plattsburgh
5,706
90
375
1200-1280
25-28
92-96
Y
James
Moore
Armstron
g
Potsdam
Colleges of
Technology
3,952
70
324
--
--
95-98
Y
Thomas
Baker
315.267.2900
Alfred State
3,528
10
30
1030-1160
22-25
86-92
N
Terry
Morgan
607.587.4187
Canton
3,780
15
16
1001
24
90
Y
Nicole
Heldt
315.386.7401
Cobleskill
2,512
20
41
1200
--
90
Y
Mary
Rooney
518.255.5562
Delhi+
Community
Colleges
3,331
14
27
1075
--
90
Y
Akira
Odani
607.746.4050
Broome
6,700
--
25
--
--
90
Y
Jenae
Norris
607.778.5001
Cayuga
ColumbiaGreene
4,747
--
40
--
--
85
Y
Bruce
Blodgett
315.255.1743
2,078
--
--
--
--
85
--
Michael
Phippen
518.828.4181
Corning+
5,301
--
--
--
--
--
Y
Karen
Brown
607.962.9151
Dutchess+
10,495
25
50
--
--
85
Y
Werner
Steger
845.431.8522
Erie
13,990
--
100
--
--
86-99
Y
Sabrina
Caine
716.851.1720
Telephone
Freshman
enrollment
Albany
Campus
Undergrad
enrollment
Appendix A. SUNY Honors Programs Information Summary 20133
University
Centers
3
Y
716.645.3020
518.564.3075
State University of New York Honors Program Information Summary. Retrieved November 25, 2013 from
http://www.suny.edu/student/downloads/pdf/honors_programs.pdf
12
Appendix A. SUNY Honors Programs Information Summary 20134 (continued)
FIT
10,207
46
167
1200
--
90
Y
Irene
Finger Lakes
FultonMontgomery
6,520
30
50
--
--
85
Y
Curtis
2,683
23
35
--
--
--
Y
Julie
Genesee
6,965
--
11
--
--
--
Y
Herkimer+
Hudson
Valley
3,507
--
--
--
--
88
13,750
--
--
1200
--
Jamestown+
5,102
40
62
--
Jefferson+
Mohawk
Valley
4,057
--
--
7,451
--
Monroe
17,296
Nassau+
23,074
Niagara
Onondaga
Orange
Rockland
7,036
12,038
6,716
8,179
Buchman
NehringBliss
212.217.4590
518.736.3622
Tanya
Mihalcik
LaneMartin
--
MaryJo
Kelley
315.866.0300
90
Y
Brian
Vlieg
518.629.8135
--
93
N
Nelson
Garifi
716.338.1000
--
--
--
--
Michael
Avery
315.786.2444
--
--
--
--
--
Maryrose
315.792.5301
--
554
1100
24
87
Paul
150
300
1100
23
90
Y
Y
Eannace
D’Alessan
dris
Melanie
Hammer
516.572.7775
Rebekah
Keaton
716.614.6809
Stephanie
Putnam
315.498.2490
Maynard
Schmidt
845.341.4040
Cliff
Garner
845.574.4715
Eileen
Abrahams
518.381.1403
Albin
Cofone
631.451.4778
Cindy
Linden
845.434.5750
17
56
55
132
29
91
77
330
1090
1100
1200
1150
-23
-25
-90
90
90
Schenectady
6,431
20
20
--
--
90
Suffolk
26,219
178
628
1100
24
90
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
585.785.1367
585.345.6800
585.292.2490
Sullivan+
Tompkins
Cortland
1,757
12
25
--
--
85
3,581
--
36
--
--
--
N
Karen
Pastorello
607.844.8222
Ulster
Westchester
+
3,702
--
--
--
--
--
--
Matthew
Green
845.687.5022
13,997
--
350
--
--
95
Y
Dwight
Goodyear
914.606.6951
4
State University of New York Honors Program Information Summary. Retrieved November 25, 2013 from
http://www.suny.edu/student/downloads/pdf/honors_programs.pdf
13
Appendix B - Details Regarding Top National Honors Programs
1. University of South Carolina
The Honors Program requires greater depth in their majors—with honors courses in all
majors—and greater breadth across the curriculum by providing a rich set of small honors
seminars covering a very wide variety of topics. Graduation with a degree with Honors from
the South Carolina Honors College requires 45 honors credits, including courses across the
liberal arts curriculum and a culminating senior thesis or project.
To encourage learning outside the classroom, the Honors College requires students to have at
least three-credit hours of honors educational experience outside of the traditional classroom
setting. A student will be able to satisfy this requirement through undergraduate research
credit, internship credit, service learning credit, or study away credit--typically through study
abroad, but this can also include National Student Exchange or the Washington Semester
Program.
• Maintain a cumulative Grade Point Average of 3.000 or higher
• Successfully complete at least two Honors courses per academic year (fall-spring)
• Successfully complete English 105i or 105 PIT Journal, if applicable
• Successfully complete one Honors First Year Seminar, if applicable. The Honors
First Year Seminar counts as one of the two Honors courses mentioned in #2 above.
• The Honors Carolina office reviews each student's progress throughout.
http://schc.sc.edu/academics-0
2. University of Michigan
The Honors Program's curriculum offers a wide range of challenging courses in almost every
department, with majors in every field in the College. The program offers special seminars,
courses, and direct involvement with faculty from the start of students' lives at Michigan.
Students are expected to elect half their course work in Honors; many do more. Many Honors
students participate in research during their first two years, and almost all Honors seniors
pursue their own independent research projects under the guidance of a faculty mentor,
leading to an Honors senior thesis.
http://www.lsa.umich.edu/honors
3. U of Texas at Austin
Plan II is a carefully designed core curriculum honors major with very specific multidisciplinary course requirements and strong emphases on problem solving, critical and
14
analytical skills, and particularly on writing—including a capstone thesis requirement. The
Plan II Honors core requirements include:
• A year-long freshman course in world literature from the ancients to the present
• Three semesters of interdisciplinary topical or thematic tutorials and seminars that
develop and refine students' analytic and synthesizing capacities
• A year-long philosophy course for sophomores
• A semester of honors social science
• Two semesters of non-US history
• A four-semester honors sequence in modes of reasoning, theoretical math, or
calculus, life sciences, and physical sciences
• A senior thesis, a major independent research and writing project, which is the
culmination of a student's academic program in Plan II
http://www.utexas.edu/cola/progs/plan2/about/
4. Arizona State University (Barrett Honors College)
Incoming freshmen take The Human Event classes (HON 171 and 272/273/274) during their
first and second semesters. In small, student-centered, seminar-style classes, students explore
the world’s great literature and humanity’s most-profound ideas. They work closely with
dedicated members of the Barrett faculty who encourage critical thinking and composition –
skills that will benefit them throughout their entire academic career.
Honors Courses and Honors Enrichment Contracts Students who enter Barrett as freshmen
follow a program of study requiring 36 hours of honors coursework, integrated into the 120
hours of courses required of all students for graduation from ASU. While in the college,
Barrett students enroll in honors seminars that are small in size – no more than 25 students
per class – and taught by full-time faculty. Over 100 seminars are offered each semester, in
topics as varied as “Theories of Enlightenment: Kant, Foucault, Habermas” and “Continuing
Challenges in Latin America.” Other honors courses include special sections of university
classes and individual enrichment contracts or group projects with professors in regular
university courses.
http://barretthonors.asu.edu/about/academic-experience/#sthash.HYCkZ672.dpuf
5. University of Georgia
In order to remain in good standing in the Honors Program, students must maintain a
cumulative GPA of 3.4 and a minimum Honors GPA of 3.3. Furthermore, students must
complete Honors courses on a regular basis to show progress towards graduation with
Honors.
15
The following courses are included in determining Honors course credit and GPA for good
standing:
• All courses identified by an “H” in the suffix and graded on an A/F basis.
• All three-credit hour, A/F graded courses beginning with an “HONS” prefix.
• Certain non-Honors courses found in the Honors course list (e.g., PHYS 1211)
• Graduate courses at the 6000 level or higher
• Approved Honors Option courses
All Honors course grades, regardless of category, are included in the Honors GPA, with the
exception that three one-credit hour pass/fail Honors courses may equal one regular Honors
course, but do not affect the Honors GPA.
http://honors.uga.edu/
16
Download