FOR FEMA AND STATE REVIEW-MeetingMinutes-Hillsboro

advertisement
FEMA Region X – Risk MAP Discovery Interview
Lower Willamette - Tualatin Watersheds
City of Hillsboro, Oregon
August 22, 2012; 2:00pm Pacific Time
City of Hillsboro
Mitch Neilson – Emergency Management Coordinator
Genny Bond – Urban Planner
FEMA Region X
Brett Holt – FEMA Mitigation Planner
STARR (FEMA Contractor)
Josha Crowley – Region X Service Center Lead
Becca Croft – Interviewer
Jason Sidorski – GIS Specialist
Gregg Pickett – Recorder
The following information was collected during the Interview. Unless otherwise noted, all comments are
from City of Hillsboro representatives.
I.
Contacts
 The contact list was reviewed and one person (Kelly Koppel) was added.
STARR (J. Sidorski) reviewed the GIS data that has been collected for the city of Hillsboro and explained
the types of additional data that could be beneficial to the project: parks, environmentally sensitive
areas, critical habitats, building footprints, parcels, topographic data (LiDAR, etc.).
II.
III.
IV.
Topography, LiDAR, and GIS
 The City has an available GIS layer that identifies fire and police station locations, as well
as other layers that may not be available from Metro.
 K. Koppel is the GIS Specialist and can be contacted for any needed GIS information.
Planning
 A city-wide Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) is in place and it is currently in the process of
being updated.
 Potential projects are ranked in the city’s HMP. Wind, flooding, and winter storms are
the greatest hazards to the city.
 M. Neilson is the sole person working on the update of the HMP, and would like to know
more about resources available to him.
Earthquakes
 The flat terrain and clay soils found in the city provide the potential for soil liquefaction
during an earthquake.
 No known mitigation projects have occurred previously, however some buildings have
been built to modern earthquake standards.
Risk MAP Discovery Interview – Lower Willamette - Tualatin Watersheds
City of Hillsboro – August 22, 2012
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
Page 2 of 3
Wildfires
 The wildfire threat in the city is minimal.
 Most of the Urban Interface issues are located north and south of the city, outside of
the city limits.
Landslides
 Because the city is largely flat, there is little potential for landslides.
Severe Storms
 High winds are a likely cause of storm damage in the city, with power lines occasionally
coming down during strong storms.
 Ice and snow are an occasional problem. A 50-year (26”) snowfall event occurred in
2008.
 The ability to clear and use roads in large snowfall events is a problem, but it is mostly a
snowplow/manpower problem.
 There has been no need for emergency shelters in the past. The Red Cross and County
do maintain a list of potential shelter sites.
 The Public Information Officer and media outlets are the primary way to get hazard and
risk information out to the public.
 A Reverse 911 system exists, but probably wouldn’t be used. Local media is more likely
to be used in the event of an emergency. Social media is not being used as a whole, but
is used at times.
Flooding
 Roads in the city have been underwater, especially during flooding in 1996, but they did
not wash out.
 The City is concerned about the accuracy of the Washington County preliminary maps
and text, although they listed their own city’s FIRMs as “pretty much correct”.
 Recent projects have expanded culverts and increased bridge sizes. This has helped
increase the amount of flow in some creeks during storm events.
 Highway 219 was underwater in some locations in 1996. Culverts may have been
replaced since that flooding event took place.
 The west end of town has three lots that are vacant and partially in the floodplain.
Development is sometimes allowed in floodplain, as long as it does not allow a net rise
in the Base Flood Elevation. There is some pressure for development on these lots.
 The City would like information on how to better regulate their floodplains. They would
like to implement stricter building codes to keep people from building, flattening, and
filling in the floodplains.
 The City has talked to Christine Shirley of the Oregon DLCD in the past, but not in recent
months.
 Hillsboro has concerns about their model ordinance.
 Storm water along the Tanner Creek Drainage is a reoccurring problem. It is a fully
developed area. The city’s storm drainage infrastructure in this area does not always
have the capacity to handle the amount of water of a large storm event.
Risk MAP Discovery Interview – Lower Willamette - Tualatin Watersheds
City of Hillsboro – August 22, 2012
IX.
X.
XI.
XII.
Page 3 of 3
Levees
 The City was not aware of any levees within the limits of Hillsboro.
Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs)
 A Significant Natural Resource overlay is available from K. Koppel.
 All ESAs located within the city are protected from any future development.
 There is some potential for development, including some areas located in the
floodplain.
Communications and Outreach
 Churches, school districts, and businesses, are primary sources of community outreach.
 The City would like some examples of the tools that other cities use for their outreach
projects.
 Saturday-Tuesday Markets and other community events seem to work better than
utility bills do for getting information out to the public. The City believes that face-toface works better than pamphlets, paper materials, etc.
 Some outreach has been done with the city’s Latino community previously, especially
for fire safety. The City prefers to emphasize preparing for any/all events, rather than
specific events.
 No real measurement of effectiveness has been completed, but the City estimates that
only about 5% of the population is being reached through their outreach efforts.
 City Council Meetings could be used to raise awareness about this and other projects,
especially among city officials.
 The City currently does not have a floodplain administrator. Management for floodplain
issues falls to the Planning Department.
 The planning director is listed in the local floodplain ordinance as the person responsible
for regulating the city’s floodplains. The City was encouraged to make sure that the City
Planner knows about his/her role and if necessary, to designate someone else to take
over that role.
 A separate floodplain permitting process exists. Any building in the floodplain requires a
floodplain alteration permit in addition to the normal building permit process.
 The City expressed a big need for additional planning and support for floodplain
management.
Other
 Hillsboro is located in Washington County, which has preliminary maps from FEMA’s
Map Modernization Project. Some communities are already using this preliminary data
for various floodplain management purposes.
 Two hospitals are located within Hillsboro, but neither has transportation issues in the
event of an emergency.
Download