The Opinion Pages | OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR
We Need to Retreat from the Beach
By ORRIN H. PILKEYNOV. 14, 2012
Photo
CreditHenning Wagenbreth
Durham, N.C.
AS ocean waters warm, the Northeast is likely to face more Sandy-like storms. And as sea levels
continue to rise, the surges of these future storms will be higher and even more deadly. We can’t
stop these powerful storms. But we can reduce the deaths and damage they cause.
Hurricane Sandy’s immense power, which destroyed or damaged thousands of homes, actually
pushed the footprints of the barrier islands along the South Shore of Long Island and the Jersey
Shore landward as the storm carried precious beach sand out to deep waters or swept it across the
islands. This process of barrier-island migration toward the mainland has gone on for 10,000
years.
Yet there is already a push to rebuild homes close to the beach and bring back the shorelines to
where they were. The federal government encourages this: there will be billions available to
replace roads, pipelines and other infrastructure and to clean up storm debris, provide security
and emergency housing. Claims to the National Flood Insurance Program could reach $7 billion.
And the Army Corps of Engineers will be ready to mobilize its sand-pumping dredges, dump
trucks and bulldozers to rebuild beaches washed away time and again.
But this “let’s come back stronger and better” attitude, though empowering, is the wrong
approach to the increasing hazard of living close to the rising sea. Disaster will strike again. We
should not simply replace all lost property and infrastructure. Instead, we need to take account of
rising sea levels, intensifying storms and continuing shoreline erosion.
I understand the temptation to rebuild. My parents’ retirement home, built at 13 feet above sea
level, five blocks from the shoreline in Waveland, Miss., was flooded to the ceiling
during Hurricane Camillein 1969. They rebuilt it, but the house was completely destroyed
byHurricane Katrina in 2005. (They had died by then.) Even so, rebuilding continued in
Waveland. A year after Katrina, one empty Waveland beachfront lot, on which successive houses
had been wiped away by Hurricanes Camille and Katrina, was for sale for $800,000.
That is madness. We should strongly discourage the reconstruction of destroyed or badly
damaged beachfront homes in New Jersey and New York. Some very valuable property will have
to be abandoned to make the community less vulnerable to storm surges. This is tough medicine,
to be sure, and taxpayers may be forced to compensate homeowners. But it should save taxpayers
money in the long run by ending this cycle of repairing or rebuilding properties in the path of
future storms. Surviving buildings and new construction should be elevated on pilings at least two
feet above the 100-year flood level to allow future storm overwash to flow underneath. Some
buildings should be moved back from the beach.
Respecting the power of these storms is not new. American Indians who occupied barrier islands
during the warm months moved to the mainland during the winter storm season. In the early
days of European settlement in North America, some communities restricted building to the bay
sides of barrier islands to minimize damage. In Colombia and Nigeria, where some people choose
to live next to beaches to reduce exposure to malarial mosquitoes, houses are routinely built to be
easily moved.
We should also understand that armoring the shoreline with sea walls will not be successful in
holding back major storm surges. As experience in New Jersey and elsewhere has shown, sea
walls eventually cause the loss of protective beaches. These beaches can be replaced, but only at
enormous cost to taxpayers. The 21-mile stretch of beach between Sandy Hook and Barnegat Inlet
in New Jersey was replenished between 1999 and 2001 at a cost of $273 million (in 2011 dollars).
Future replenishment will depend on finding suitable sand on the continental shelf, where it is
hard to find.
And as sea levels rise, replenishment will be required more often. In Wrightsville Beach, N.C., the
beach already has been replenished more than 20 times since 1965, at a cost of nearly $53 million
(in 2011 dollars). Taxpayers in at least three North Carolina communities — Carteret and Dare
Counties and North Topsail Beach — have voted down tax increases to pay for these projects in
the last dozen years. The attitude was: we shouldn’t have to pay for the beach. We weren’t the
ones irresponsible enough to build next to an eroding shoreline.
This is not the time for a solution based purely on engineering. The Army Corps undoubtedly will
be heavily involved. But as New Jersey and New York move forward, officials should seek advice
from oceanographers, coastal geologists, coastal and construction engineers and others who
understand the future of rising seas and their impact on barrier islands. We need more resilient
development, to be sure. But we also need to begin to retreat from the ocean’s edge.
Correction: November 23, 2012
An earlier version of this article misstated the amount spent on beach replenishment in
Wrightsville Beach, N.C., since 1965. It was about $53 million in 2011 dollars, not $543 million.
Orrin H. Pilkey is an emeritus professor of earth sciences at Duke University and a co-author of
“The Rising Sea.”