1
Supplemental Material
2
3
Figure S1. Schematic representation of the experimental design. Three mesocosms have been prepared from
4
the same soil and subjected to three treatments (A, B, C). From each mesocosm samples from 9 time series
5
have been taken and from each sample a triplicate analysis has been performed for a total of 54 samples
6
(which correspond to 108 raw sequence files and 54 paired-end sequence files).
7
Figure S2. ANOSIM result representation. Genera distribution in all conditions. This plot is the direct result of
8
the ANOSIM analysis; genera distributions of all conditions are reported using a standard boxplot distribution.
9
As we can see all conditions show a distinct pattern of genera distribution as confirmed by the ANOSIM analysis
10
(pvalue less than 0.01).
11
Table S1. Community data matrix (X) at genus level. The number of assignments from each genus in the 54
12
samples is reported.
13
Table S2. Diversity indices in the samples. H, Shannon index; S, richness (genus level); J, Simpson index with
14
standard deviations are reported.
15
Table S3. Taxonomic assignments of reads in genera from Ribosomal Database Project Classifier output. The
16
taxonomic lineage of each genus is reported with the number of assigned reads for each of the 54 samples.
17
Table S4. Number of assignments in the core, accessory and unique bacteriome fraction. The number of
18
assignment per each sample is reported.
19
Supplemental Material
20
1
21
Figure S1. Schematic representation of the experimental design. Three mesocosms have been prepared from
22
the same soil and subjected to three treatments (A, B, C). From each mesocosm samples from 9 time series
23
have been taken and from each sample a triplicate analysis has been performed for a total of 54 samples
24
(which correspond to 108 raw sequence files and 54 paired-end sequence files).
25
Figure S2. ANOSIM result representation. Genera distribution in all conditions. This plot is the direct result of
26
the ANOSIM analysis; genera distributions of all conditions are reported using a standard boxplot distribution.
27
As we can see all conditions show a distinct pattern of genera distribution as confirmed by the ANOSIM analysis
28
(pvalue less than 0.01).
29
Table S1. Community data matrix (X) at genus level. The number of assignments from each genus in the 54
30
samples is reported.
31
Table S2. Diversity indices in the samples. H, Shannon index; S, richness (genus level); J, Simpson index with
32
standard deviations are reported.
33
Table S3. Taxonomic assignments of reads in genera from Ribosomal Database Project Classifier output. The
34
taxonomic lineage of each genus is reported with the number of assigned reads for each of the 54 samples.
35
Table S4. Number of assignments in the core, accessory and unique bacteriome fraction. The number of
36
assignment per each sample is reported.
37
2