SMEs and the creation of decent and productive employment The world faces serious economic problems, characterised, despite some positive signs, by a slow emergence from the economic crisis, growing inequality, a distinct lack of newly created employment, high levels of unemployment, particularly youth unemployment, and disastrous budgetary situations in many States. The policies pursued do not in fact seem capable of bringing the economy back on track into sustainable growth, with, furthermore, the creation of sufficient, decent employment. While the predominant political discourse seems to advocate short term solutions, a true reversal of the situation cannot be achieved unless there is a focus on medium and long term policies, aiming in particular to support the creation of businesses and the promotion of an enterprise spirit, as well as an increase in the creation of decent employment, by and in SMEs. SMEs mean jobs and growth! For this, social partners in AICESIS [The International Association of Economic and Social Councils and Similar Institutions] need to contribute to providing political decision makers throughout the world with the necessary guidance in order to create growth, prosperity and stability in the largest economic sector, namely that of the SMEs. Without them, there would be no recovery or economic stability, without them there would be no creation of productive employment, not to mention decent employment. The role of SMEs in the economy and society It can be said that 99.9% of businesses are SMEs. Why therefore should one care so much about large enterprises? Indeed, almost all the legislation at both economic and social levels and relating to the business environment that has been adopted throughout the world seems to have been inspired by a concern to regulate aspects of the business environment for major companies (finances, governance, fiscal matters, ownership rights, etc…) whereas logic would dictate that one should deal first with SMEs, and only then add layers of legislation relating only to large enterprises. In Europe, out of over 20 million businesses, there are only 43,700 businesses with more than 250 employees. On the other hand, more than 19 million businesses employ fewer than 10 people (micro-enterprises). The typical business in Europe employs 6 people, including the owner/entrepreneur, SMEs account for 2/3rds of private employment, and approximately 60% of added value. 80% of jobs created in the last ten years were in SMEs1. These figures are even more skewed towards SMEs than in other parts of the world. Political Europe likes to refer to a “Small Business Act” or the principle of “thinking small first” but quickly forgetting these adages and reverting to a ‘business as usual’ approach when it comes to establishing a regulatory, legislative framework. And this despite all the 1 EC – Annual report on European SMEs evidence, when it is a question of promoting SMEs with their inherent natural advantages: an enterprise spirit, proximity, and the creation of employment, value, and wealth. Promoting economic growth and the creation of decent employment through SMEs entails first of all respecting certain legislative principles: Thinking small, first; Just once; Proportionality; Taking impact studies into account. The recent economic crisis has once again demonstrated that SMEs are the stabilising influence par excellence in the face of economic adversity. Once again, it is the SMEs that play a major role in initial and continuing professional education, two factors of major importance for providing the transition from school to employment and for the qualification of workers. SMEs contribute innovation, even in the absence of formal R&D programmes in the traditional sense. In fact innovation in SMEs is established in co-operation with employees, suppliers and clients, while working on specific projects, and their competitiveness depends largely on their capacity to improve their products and services on a constant basis. The transition towards a sustainable economy, towards a “green” economy, will be provided by SMEs, through the integration of energy efficiency strategies and the development of products and services that meet the criteria of sustainability. SMEs are at the heart of economic and regional and local social stability, with a strong involvement in communities, providing products and day-to-day services, and as a presence at the heart of towns and villages and in rural areas. With their employees, owner/entrepreneurs have long-term strategic and entrepreneurial views of the development of their company at the local and regional level, where shareholders and managers would only see short term profits and market share. SMEs, the creation of businesses, and decent employment SMEs have the potential to bring the economy out of the crisis and to contribute to the development of employment throughout the world. But they cannot do this on their own; policies need to support them and to put in place the economic and social framework that is favourable for creativity and the enterprise spirit, the creation of businesses and the development of decent, productive employment. The formalisation of structures and governance Entrepreneurs need well-established structures such as organisations of employers or professional chambers. This formalisation of business structures is essential, because they encourage the governance of States, of communities and of SMEs, and contribute in particular to the putting in place of joint programmes, for example in the field of initial and continuing professional training. Organisations of employers are the natural counterpart to workers’ organisations; together they represent the two sides of the same coin. States need to ensure that freedom of association is guaranteed and to encourage the establishment of these social partner structures. Limitation of the informal sector Concerning SMEs, alongside the practical support that these structures can offer, they are essential in limiting competition from the non-formal sector. Illegal, undeclared, clandestine, illicit working, and the “grey”, informal economy are many factors preventing the ordered establishment of businesses, particularly in emergent or developing economies. The informal sector, by preventing the taking of profits, renders illusory the related investments and gains in productivity, prevents the putting in place of stable employment relationships and systems of professional training leading to qualifications. The informal sector even goes so far as asphyxiating any fair form of taxation, which is after all the basis of the State. Hence the key importance for States of avoiding as far as possible the emergence of an informal sector that renders economic and social progress derived from the SMEs impossible. Professional training The most efficient economies throughout the world are characterised in particular by a system of work-linked training, with the involvement of businesses and educational establishments. These so-called dual systems of training are ideally administered by established organisations of social partners with attention paid to quality, recognition through certification and continual adaptation. This dual training can play a driving role in training for entrepreneurship, as demonstrated by the German example of dual training, and particularly the type referred to as “Handwerk” – craftsmanship – where the three facets of “Geselle” (journeyman) – Meister (master) – Niederlassung (establishment)” can serve as an example throughout the world. This system, through the strong involvement of entrepreneurs with a direct interest in training their staff, who may also be their potential successors, may be cited as an example of the genre. Furthermore, the significant decentralisation of the system through training provided in companies enables States to put in place an effective professional training system that has relatively limited financial impacts in relation to other training systems. Social partners are even better placed to put in place continuing professional training systems due to their involvement in companies. Through these structures, social partners can effectively promote the productivity of businesses, thereby also creating bases for the sustainable improvement of working conditions. Access to finance Both in developed countries and in developing countries, SMEs are experiencing difficulties with access to finance for their investments. In order to promote the development of SMEs, it is thus essential to support the banking sector with a particular emphasis on the development of regional and local banking initiatives. Alongside traditional banking instruments such as loans, States and International institutions should promote the putting in place of venture capital or guarantee deposits and securities (co-operatives or mutual funds), particularly for covering larger financial risks. In this order of ideas, the simplification of regulations relating to the stock exchange would certainly be a way of facilitating access to investment for SMEs in many countries. In developing countries, above all access to micro-finance can be a key element for the development of SMEs. Access to markets Guaranteeing access by SMEs to markets is essential to enable them to develop. Many points need to be addressed in this context: Administrative simplification; Costs of licences and rights linked to intellectual property; High quality public services; and utilities; Public contracts and tenders; Reciprocity in access to supply contracts; Organised crime (forgery, social dumping practices, etc...) Internationalisation of SME business activities. States can thus contribute significantly to the development of SMEs, enabling these substantial aspects for SMEs to be given adequate consideration. Public contracts are of particular importance in this context. In fact, States can organise public contracts in a way that actively supports the development of SMEs by instituting and effectively respecting certain principles such as separation into lots for the purchasing of products or tendering by separate trades in specific, different services. The consideration of criteria of sustainability (learning, continuing training, respect for certain social standards, ecological aspects, CO2 footprint, etc.) alongside simply financial aspects can enable the encouragement of access to public contracts for SMEs, and thus the creation of decent and productive employment in these businesses. Energy A last, particularly important point to enable the development of SMEs and the creation of decent and productive employment is that of access to energy, and more particularly, electrical energy. This point may seem derisory for developed countries – although the problem of equitable access to energy does remain in respect of distortions in competition that may be linked to it – it is a much more acute problem in developing countries where electrical energy is totally lacking, or subject to irregular or erratic supply do not enable its rational use in a production process. It is thus essential for States and international institutions to develop access to (electrical) energy supply networks specifically so that businesses can operate efficiently, and thus to promote societal development. This goes hand in hand with control that does not amount to a stranglehold by States (with good governance) or by institutions, on networks, to guarantee clean, ecologically sustainable energy, a universal service and at affordable prices for all populations and SMEs. It is all a question of governance SMEs are the backbone of any economy, regardless of its degree of advancement. States must therefore ensure that they guarantee an environment that is favourable to the emergence of businesses while above all ensuring their democratic legitimisation and human rights, as well as good governance of the State’s functioning. Infrastructures, education, and energy are all prerequisites for the proper function of society and of the economy, as well as for the creation of businesses. Entrepreneurs themselves must also look after their own governance and assume their own responsibilities. We cannot have it both ways, mixing at will the status of entrepreneur, an informal economy and nepotism with the sole objective of personal enrichment and avoiding any contribution to society, even just in terms of taxes or job creation. Businesses are at the base of the creation of wealth but they must accept the sharing of this wealth, with a view to sustainability. Putting in place organisations of employers can in this context constitute an effective way of ensuring this structure. Together with organisations representing workers, they are best placed to establish the institutions and programmes that are necessary for the proper functioning of employment relations. In conclusion, the involvement of civil society in democratic processes constitutes the final link in ensuring proper political and economic governance. In such a propitious environment, through the creation of businesses, SMEs can then prosper and develop freely, and create wealth and sustainable jobs of high quality.