Toxicity of MCHM: Supplementary materials Supplementary Material: Daily Adult MCHM Exposure Assuming Typical Ingestion of Contaminated Water After The Elk River Spill (even though there was a ‘do not use order’ and presence of an odor) A. Adult Oral Ingestion of MCHM in Tap Water Adult oral exposure to MCHM was calculated based on the USEPA exposure factors used to derive regional screening levels (USEPA 2014) as shown below. We evaluated three exposure scenarios. In the first example, the tap water concentration of MCHM was assumed to be at the analytical detection limit of 0.01 ppm (10 µg/L). Second, we examined the CDC’s short-term health advisory of 1 ppm (1,000 µg/L). Third, we examined the highest reported concentration in finished water of 3.1 ppm (3,100 µg/L). πΌππππ π‘πππππΆπ»π = [(πΆπ€ππ‘ππ )π₯ (πΆπΉ)π₯ (πΌ)] π΅π Where: IngestionMCHM: Ingestion of MCHM for an adult in tap water per day (mg/kg-day) Cwater: Concentration of MCHM in tap water (10, 1,000 or 3,100 µg/L) CF: Conversion factor (0.001 mg/µg) I: Intake of water for an adult per day (2.5 L) (USEPA 2014) (Note: We used the EPA default value of 2.5 L/day even though it is known that in the U.S. a large fraction of ingested fluid is not tap water (e.g., canned beverages, bottled water). Also, many persons drink coffee, teas, or otherwise heat/boil their water, which will reduce the concentration of the volatile contaminants.) BW: Adult body weight (80 kg) (USEPA 2014) Scenario I: Assuming the MCHM tap water concentration is at the detection limit (10 µg/L): ππ 0.001 ππ πΏ [(10 πΏ ) π₯ ( ππ ) π₯ (2.5 πππ¦)] ππ = 0.00031 80 ππ ππ − πππ¦ 1 Toxicity of MCHM: Supplementary materials Scenario II: Assuming the MCHM tap water concentration is at the CDC short-term health advisory (1000 µg/L): ππ 0.001 ππ πΏ )] [(1000 πΏ ) π₯ ( ππ ) π₯ (2.5 ππ πππ¦ = 0.031 80 ππ ππ − πππ¦ Scenario III: Assuming the MCHM tap water concentration is at the highest concentration detected in finished water (3,100 µg/L): ππ 0.001 ππ πΏ [(3100 πΏ ) π₯ ( ππ ) π₯ (2.5 πππ¦)] ππ = 0.097 80 ππ ππ − πππ¦ B. Adult Dermal Contact with MCHM in Tap Water (Bathing) Adult dermal uptake (absorption) of MCHM during water contact (bathing) was calculated based on the USEPA RAGS part E (USEPA 2004) as shown below. Three scenarios were evaluated. The tap water concentration of MCHM was assumed to be at (1) the analytical detection limit of 0.01 ppm (10 µg/L), (2) the CDC’s short-term health advisory of 1 ppm (1,000 µg/L), (3) or the highest reported concentration in finished water of 3.1 ppm (3,100 µg/L) (WVAW 2014b, 2014a). [Based on the short duration of skinwater contact, the reduced amount of skin surface area continually in contact with water (in comparison to bathing), and the predicted octanol/water co-efficient, dermal uptake during showering would likely be low or negligible.] Predicted MCHM permeability coefficient: log πΎπ = −2.80 + 0.66 π₯ log πΎππ€ − 0.0056 π₯ ππ πΎπ = 10(−2.8+0.66π₯πΎππ€−0.0056π₯ππ) Where: Kp: Dermal permeability coefficient of MCHM in water (cm/hr) Log Kow: Log Kow of MCHM as predicted by VEGA (average =2.22) MW: Molecular weight of MCHM (128.2 g/mol) 2 Toxicity of MCHM: Supplementary materials 0.0089ππ/βπ = 10(−2.8+[0.66 π₯ 2.22]−[0.0056 π₯ 128.2]) Dermal MCHM exposure potential (called dermal absorbed dose per event by the EPA) for an adult during bathing 6 πππ£πππ‘ π₯ π‘ππ£πππ‘ π π·π΄ππ£πππ‘ = 2 πΉπ΄ π₯ πΎπ π₯ πΆπ€ππ‘ππ √ Where: DAevent: Dermal exposure potential or absorbed dermal dose per an bathing (mg/cm2-event) FA: Fraction absorbed water (1 dimensionless) Kp: Dermal permeability coefficient of MCHM in water (0.0089 cm/hr) Cwater: Concentration of MCHM in tap water (10, 1,000 or 3,100 µg/L which is equivalent to 0.00001 mg/cm3, 0.001 mg/cm3, or 0.0031 mg/cm3) τevent: Lag time per event (0.55 hr/event) πππ£πππ‘ = 0.105 π₯ 10(0.0056 π₯ ππ) 0.55 βπ/ππ£πππ‘ = 0.105 π₯ 10(0.0056 π₯ 128.2) tevent: Assumed duration of bathing 17 min (0.28 hr/event) (USEPA 2011) Scenario I: Assuming the MCHM tap water concentration is at the detection limit (10 µg/L= 0.00001 mg/cm3): βπ βπ ππ ππ √6 π₯ 0.55 ππ£πππ‘ π₯ 0.28 ππ£πππ‘ ππ 2 π₯ 1 π₯ 0.0089 π₯ 0.00001 3 = 9.65 π₯10−8 βπ ππ π ππ2 Scenario II: Assuming the MCHM tap water concentration is at the CDC short-term health advisory (1000 µg/L = 0.001 mg/cm3): βπ βπ ππ ππ √6 π₯ 0.55 ππ£πππ‘ π₯ 0.28 ππ£πππ‘ ππ 2 π₯ 1 π₯ 0.0089 π₯ 0.001 3 = 9.65 π₯10−6 βπ ππ π ππ2 3 Toxicity of MCHM: Supplementary materials Scenario III: Assuming the MCHM tap water concentration is at the highest concentration detected in finished water (3,100 µg/L = 0.0031 mg/cm3): βπ βπ ππ ππ √6 π₯ 0.55 ππ£πππ‘ π₯ 0.28 ππ£πππ‘ ππ 2 π₯ 1 π₯ 0.0089 π₯ 0.0031 3 = 2.99 π₯10−5 βπ ππ π ππ2 Dermal MCHM dose during bathing π·πππππππΆπ»π = [π·π΄ ππ£πππ‘ π₯ πππ΄ π₯ πΈπΉ] π΅π Where: DermalMCHM: Dose for an adult during bathing (mg/kg-day) DAevent: Dermal exposure potential or absorbed dermal dose per an event (mg/cm2-event) SSA: Skin surface area for an adult (20,900 cm2) (USEPA, 2014) EF: Exposure frequency (1 event/day) BW: Adult body weight (80 kg) (USEPA, 2014) Scenario I: Assuming the MCHM tap water concentration is at the detection limit: [9.65 π₯10−8 ππ π₯ 20,900ππ2 π₯ 1 ππ£πππ‘/πππ¦] ππ ππ2 = 2.52 π₯ 10−5 80 ππ ππ − πππ¦ Scenario II: Assuming the MCHM tap water concentration is at the CDC short-term health advisory: [9.65 π₯10−6 ππ π₯ 20,900ππ2 π₯ 1 ππ£πππ‘/πππ¦] ππ ππ2 = 2.52 π₯ 10−3 80 ππ ππ − πππ¦ 4 Toxicity of MCHM: Supplementary materials Scenario III: Assuming the MCHM tap water concentration is at the highest concentration detected in finished water: [2.99 π₯10−5 ππ π₯ 20,900ππ2 π₯ 1 ππ£πππ‘/πππ¦] ππ ππ2 = 7.81 π₯ 10−3 80 ππ ππ − πππ¦ C. Adult Inhalation of MCHM While Showering Adult inhalation exposure to MCHM during showering was calculated based on USEPA (2014) as shown below. The tap water concentration of MCHM was assumed to be at (1) the analytical detection limit of 0.01 ppm (10 µg/L), (2) the CDC’s short-term health advisory of 1 ppm (1,000 µg/L), or (3) the highest reported concentration in finished water of 3.1 ppm (3,100 µg/L). The air concentration during showering was estimated using a model of volatilization based on two film resistance theory (Little 1992). This model was used to estimate a steady state volatilization factor (0.137 µg/m3 per µg/L) (time-weighted average; not steady state) that was used to estimate the air concentration in bathroom air based on the concentration in shower water (1.37, 137, 424 µg/m3 for scenarios I, II, and III, respectively). We also considered some empirical data (Kerger et al. 2000; Jo et al. 1990; McKone et al. 1991). To calculate the estimated air concentration two-resistance theory was applied to the transfer of volatile chemicals from shower water to air by means of tow transient mass balance models. The calculations are outlined in Little et al. (1992). We calculated the air concentration as a function of time, rather than a steady state approximation. The exposure factors used were: air exchange rate shower (2.4 L/hr), air exchange rate bathroom (0.28 L/hr), shower volume (2,800 L), bathroom volume (8,100 L), water flow rate (13.7 L/min) (Little et al. 1992). These values are consistent with Kerger et al. (2000). The chemical specific parameters were estimated using EPISUITE and the following values were used in our calculation: diffusivity in air (6.66 x 10-6 m2/sec), diffusivity in water (6.98 x 10-10 m2/sec), and unitless Henry’s law (3.59 x 10-4) (USEPA 2012). πΌπβππππ‘πππππΆπ»π = πΆπππ π₯ πΆπΉ π₯ π‘ππ£πππ‘ π₯ πΌπ π₯ πΈπΉ π΅π Where: InhalationMCHM: Inhaled dose of MCHM during shower (mg/kg) Cair: Concentration of MCHM in air, estimated using the Little method (1.37 µg/m3, 137 µg/m3, 424 µg/m3) CF: Conversion factor (0.001 mg/µg) tevent: Assumed duration of showering (0.28 hr/event) IR: Inhalation rate of an adult (0.67 m3/hr) (USEPA, 2014) EF: Exposure frequency (1 event/day) BW: Adult body weight (80 kg) (USEPA, 2014) 5 Toxicity of MCHM: Supplementary materials Scenario I: Assuming the MCHM tap water concentration is the detection limit: 1.37 ππ ππ π3 ππ£πππ‘ π₯0.001 π₯ 0.28 βπ π₯ 0.67 π₯1 3 ππ ππ βπ πππ¦ π = 3.21 π₯ 10−6 80 ππ ππ Scenario II: Assuming the MCHM tap water concentration is the CDC short-term health advisory: 137 ππ ππ π3 π₯0.001 ππ π₯ 0.28 βπ π₯ 0.67 π₯ 1 ππ£πππ‘/πππ¦ 3 βπ π = 3.21 π₯ 10−4 ππ/ππ 80 ππ Scenario III: Assuming the MCHM tap water concentration is the highest concentration detected in finished water: 424 ππ ππ π3 π₯0.001 π₯ 0.28 βπ π₯ 0.67 π₯ 1 ππ£πππ‘/πππ¦ ππ βπ π3 = 9.94 π₯ 10−4 ππ/ππ 80 ππ Summary of Estimated Intake MCHM for the Exemplar Water Concentrations Adult Exposure MCHM per day (assuming one bathing/showering event) Pathway Ingestion of tap water Dermal contact during bathing Inhalation during showering Daily Dose (mg/kg-day) for 0.01 ppm tap water 0.00031 2.52 x 10-5 Daily Dose (mg/kg-day) for 1 ppm tap water 0.031 0.00252 Daily Dose (mg/kg-day) for 3.1 ppm tap water 0.097 0.00781 Percent Contribution to total Dose (%) 3.21 x 10-6 3.21 x 10-4 9.94 x 10-4 0.95 91.6 7.45 6 Toxicity of MCHM: Supplementary materials References Jo, W. K., C. P. Weisel, and P. J. Lioy. 1990. Routes of chloroform exposure and body burden from showering with chlorinated tap water. Risk Analysis 10 (4):575-80. Kerger, B. D., C. E. Schmidt, and D. J. Paustenbach. 2000. Assessment of airborne exposure to trihalomethanes from tap water in residential showers and baths. Risk Anal 20 (5):637-51. Little, J.C. 1992. Applying the Two-Resistance Theory to Contaminant Volatilization in Showers. Environ Sci Technol 26:1341-1349. McKone, T. E., and J. P. Knezovich. 1991. The transfer of trichloroethylene (TCE) from a shower to indoor air: experimental measurements and their implications. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 41 (6):832-7. USEPA. 2004. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E, Supplemtal Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment): Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. USEPA. 2011. Exposure factors handbook, 2011 Edition. Washington, DC: National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development. USEPA. 2012. Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. USEPA. 2014. Memorandum: Human Health Evaluation Manual, Supplemental Guidance: Update of Standard Default Exposure Factors. OSWER Directive 9200.1-120: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. WVAW. 2014a. Sampling Results. Accessed March 5, 2015: http://www.dhsem.wv.gov/Documents/Sampling%20Results/OPERATION%20LOG%2 018JAN1800%20Initial.pdf. WVAW. 2014b. WVAW Operation Log as of 18 Jan at 1800. Accessed March 5, 2015: http://www.dhsem.wv.gov/Documents/Sampling%20Results/OPERATION%20LOG%2 018JAN1800%20Water.pdf. 7