Environment and Politics – Section 03
Project CCI
Campus Composting Initiative
Ryan Bailey, Melanie Cady, Anna Thonis, and Natalie Yap
13
Table of Contents
Opening ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2
Aims, Location, Site Justification and Organization---------------------------------------------- Page 3
Potential for Scaling Up and Out -------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 5
Related Projects and Involved Organizations ----------------------------------------------------- Page 8
Rationale ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 10
Project Design and Context ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page 11
Closing ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page 17
Works Cited ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page 19
1
Opening
Following paper waste, food waste is the second largest volume of waste produced in the
United States, and the main wasters of this food are college students. The buffet-style dining that
college campuses utilize is a great way to satisfy every student’s food needs and wants, however
this leads to a massive amount of food waste, and now, with sustainable living growing in
popularity, students are taking the initiative to cut back on food waste all across the U.S. A
study at American University found that, over a six-day period, tray-free dining reduced food
waste by 32%.1 That is a simple step towards a more sustainable campus that is incredibly easy
to implement and a step that would make a huge difference in the sustainability of Rensselaer
Polytechnic Institute if implemented on campus. Trays allow students to pick up more food;
when allowed, students pick up, on average, 2.5 times the amount of food than they will actually
eat since they can carry so much on a tray.2 Another effort beginning to be made more and more
frequently is composting the food waste in college campus dining halls because even if trays are
not used, food waste is inevitable. The article “Youth Fighting Food Waste on College
Campuses” highlights some of the key benefits of composting, explaining how it is “enriching
the soil and reducing methane gas emissions.”3 According to the Environmental Protection
Agency, only 3% of the thirty-million metric tons of food waste generated in 2010 was
composted. That shocking and upsetting percent is expected to grow as more and more college
campuses begin to implement a composting system, as well as eliminate tray use which will
reduce food waste overall. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute has four main dining halls as well as
numerous cafes and ultimately, food waste runs high on the campus of the Engineers. The
statistics noted above are only some of the shocking numbers that are associated with the high
1
Jameson, Charlotte
Ibid
3
Ibid
2
2
amount of food waste that college campuses continue to produce. Although food waste is a
problem at RPI, as it is for virtually every college campus in the nation, RPI does utilize various
sustainable activities such as green roofing over buildings like the Student Union. Green roofing
acts as another layer of insulation and so it lowers building heating and cooling costs. It also
reduces air pollution, water runoff, and increases biodiversity. By implementing green roofs
across campus, RPI can largely reduce its carbon footprint and overall become a much more
sustainable school. Green roofing initiatives taken by RPI require maintenance and fertilizer in
order to keep the plant life healthy and by utilizing a compost system with the dining halls, RPI
can generate its own compost to use on the green roofs, forming one complete circle of
sustainable living on campus from food waste to food regrowth.
Aims, Location, Site Justification and Organization
Through the implementation of Project CCI, RPI will be more sustainable and thus more
energy efficient. The project is essentially three ideas combined into one. First, it aims to reduce
the amount of paper towel and napkin waste that is sent to landfills. Second, because these paper
products cannot be recycled, a composting site near Robison Field will be established to compost
the paper waste. Finally, using the compost from the paper products and food scraps, the project
aims to establish and develop “green roofs” on the roofs of buildings that consume the most
energy.
Accomplishing all of these tasks will make Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute more
environmentally-friendly. Establishing a compost pile near Robison field will not only help to
reduce waste, but it will also make compost which makes soil very rich in nutrients. This
compost could be used as fertilizer on fields all across the RPI campus if it grew large enough.
3
Since the compost contains paper products, it could be used in place of the fertilizer that is used
currently because it contains lower levels of chemical contaminants, thus compost made on
campus will provide the needed nutrients for the plants to grow without the harm or expense of
chemicals.4
The main goal of the compost is to use it as fertilizer on the green roofs the project aims to
implement. The nutrient-rich soil will sustain plant life well, making for an efficient roof that
absorbs heat energy well. These green roofs will reduce the cost required to cool and heat
buildings by up to 20%.5
The project will need four people to do specialized tasks in overseeing the development
of the project. The first individual would be in charge of the composting portion of the project.
This individual will inform janitors of the extra tasks this composting is going to require. He or
she would work with administrators to decide the best location for the compost pile, and would
detail the infrastructure needed to begin composting on campus. The second team member
would advocate for the implementation of a composting system. He or she might put up fliers
around campus, put an advertisement on RPI’s radio station or in the newspaper, and may do so
with the assistance of some the previously mentioned stakeholders. The main goal of this person
is to tell students and teachers who are interested in the sustainability of the RPI campus about
what the project aims to accomplish, how it is being accomplished, and why it is important. A
third person would be in charge of the green roof portion of the project. He or she would be
responsible for researching what plants should go on the roof, compiling a list of contacts of
businesses which can design and construct green roofs, and deciding what buildings a green roof
could be built upon with RPI administration. The fourth person would be in charge of managing
4
5
Resources
Klinkenborg
4
the project’s information. An accountant who could manage our money effectively would be
required in this department in order to keep our finances in order. The accountant would keep
track of the costs required to do all of these things, and may try to get RPI on board with our
solution using evidence that exemplifies the cost-effectiveness of beginning a composting system
on campus, and details the benefits of developing other green roofs around campus. This person
may also note dates on which important steps in the project were taken. Defining these positions
is the first step in turning this idea into a reality.
Potential for Scaling Up and Out
What must be established first is some sort of compost collection system that is integrated
into the already existing waste disposal system. After establishing a system in which compost on
campus can be collected and then processed locally, meaning on or nearby the RPI campus,
compost produced can then be utilized for the maintenance of many plants around campus. The
ideal location for this on-campus compost site would be between 17 Street and Burdett Avenue,
in the park near Robison field. There is a good amount of unused space that can be easily
converted into a compost site. According to RPI’s Sustainability Report conducted in 2003,
“half of the garbage [produced by the RPI campus], by weight, was recyclable, and the other half
was compost. Garbage removal is estimated to cost $150-160 per ton.6 Sufficient recycling is
calculated to save between $50,000 and $125,000 each year.”7 From this data, one can deduce
that RPI would be diverting between 330-780 tons of waste from landfills a year. The money
saved by not sending all the recyclable and compostable waste to a landfill would be used to
fund the development of a composting system on campus. The most feasible type of composting
6
7
Raju
Ibid
5
that RPI can implement would be in-vessel composting. This requires the purchase of large
containers that can regulate the specific heat and air flow necessary for the contents to
decompose. The cost of commercial-sized in-vessel compost containers range from $18,00075,000 per vessel.8 This, however, is dependent on size of the container and costs to set up the
container. Although those initial costs are seemingly large, the containers still cost less than the
amount usually spent on sending the waste to landfills. Once the composting containers are
established, the heat generated by the decomposition of the waste, and the gas produced as well,
can more easily be harvested, or captured, and used as an energy source than if the compost heat
was not contained. As the campus begins to use this composting system more and actively
begins to sort the waste, there will be an increase in compostable material that would need to be
processed. In-vessel composting is a viable solution to this diverted waste because another
vessel can easily be purchased if the ones currently in use are not large enough to hold all of the
compostable waste. The initial costs may appear high, but in the long run, RPI will be saving
money on diverting waste from the landfills through recycling and composting, and will continue
to develop as a more sustainable campus.
To expand on Project CCI, other schools could adopt similar methods of integrating
compost as part of their waste collection. By having locally established compost processors,
meaning an area for a compost heap to reside, instead of sending the waste away, the schools
will be able to deal with their own waste and turn it into something more useful by means of
composting. By ensuring that the compost would stay local, the fertilizer produced after the
decomposition of the wasted materials can easily go back to benefit the community from which
it came. Also heat produced from the decomposition process can be captured and used for
energy production. “Hot compost piles can reach 160 degrees Fahrenheit, which is considerably
8
Raju
6
higher than the 120 degrees Fahrenheit that the U.S. Department of Energy suggests for a hot
water heater setting.”9 Compost heaps are viable source for energy production that should be
taken into consideration now.
In some cities around the country, there are well developed composting programs already
in place. These would include Seattle, Portland, and San Francisco. In Portland, garbage
disposal is only collected every other week. This encourages citizens to reduce the amount of
waste they produce as well as what kind of waste they produce. In San Francisco, it is
mandatory for all residents and businesses to have signed up for composting, as a step to
achieving the goal of “zero-waste” by 2020. Composting in those cities has proven to decrease
waste disposal costs, since composting services are not only cheaper than garbage disposal in the
long run, but they help to better the development of each area. Expanding this project to areas
that are similar in size to that RPI, population and area wise, will take effort to integrate;
however the development and implementation of the process is not impossible. If established
composting systems can exist and thrive in densely populated urban areas, then composting can
definitely exist in areas with less dense of a population and more space than any urban area
would typically have.
Universities in America have begun to collect their paper waste for compost. Schools
such as UC Berkeley, San Francisco State University, MIT and even Carleton College in
Minnesota have begun to do their part. At Carleton, the implementation of unbleached napkins
first was established, then a pilot program, dealing with the composting of paper towels in
restrooms, was tested in a select number of dorms to see how effective the new system would be.
They were able to effectively educate students in small increments.10 As the pilot program
9
Murphy, Melissa
Carleton College
10
7
became successful, the composting initiative in bathrooms spread across their campus. Project
CCI’s goal is to not only be able to compost disposable napkins from restrooms and dining halls,
but to actually use the created compost towards established green initiatives on campus, such as
green roofs. Creating a model of how composting as a system can work on a campus, the project
aims to spread the establishment of composting as a source of fertilizer, and as means of a
diversion from landfills. This process is similar to establishing one’s own backyard compost,
however this would be dealing with the backyard of a whole institution. By spreading
composting as a viable solution to paper towel waste and to help reduce the usage of chemicalfilled fertilizer, other college campuses and office buildings may be more open to implementing
a similar system of their own.
Related Projects and Involved Organizations
Sustainability is a huge concern in today’s society; it is clear that there needs to be
something done in order to make sure campuses around the country have to put steps toward
making their campus more sustainable. Many Universities are taking initiative and increasing
their sustainability by implementing green practices. For example, Carleton College has a waste
program through which the college aims to decrease contamination between trash, recycling, and
compostable materials.11 Using a three can system, students are responsible for sorting their
waste.12 This shows students where exactly what their wastes are and where they are going.
Carleton College has also set up a receptacle in bathrooms solely for the paper towels that are
used in drying hands to be composted. Their results were staggering; “With more than 50 shared
bathrooms in ten dorms on campus, switching the bathroom waste stream from trash to
11
12
Carleton College
Ibid
8
composting had a significant impact – approximately 12,000 pounds of paper towels each
year”.13 Carleton College has a population of approximately 2,000 students; comparatively, RPI
has a population of approximately 5,000 students.14 Therefore, with a greater number of students
at a ratio of 2:5, RPI students could potentially be creating 30,000 pounds of paper towels each
year. The campus also has a volunteer program to get students directly involved in the campus
program and enforcing the importance of the project. Carleton College is not the only college
making a difference. Michigan State University has a sustainability project that revolves around
green roofs. By re-introducing biodiversity into the environment and reducing the effects of the
construction of buildings, green roofs help to reduce the school’s carbon footprint. The
University of Oregon has a strong composting program that separates their waste. After the
addition of their composting program the school saw a direct return in creating usable soil which
ultimately saved them money in campus and grounds costs. The college’s zero waste program
has expanded rapidly throughout campus, first starting at only a small level and then
encompassing their student union, café’s and many other buildings throughout campus. The
composting sites are used heavily by students and have taken a large amount of waste that is
compostable, out of landfills and put to good use. Middlebury College, with a population of
2,500 students, composts over 300 tons of food waste per year.15 They have over 85 compost
bins in dorms and offices throughout the entire campus.16 With the almost doubled population
that The campus has a highly developed composting system. They store it in walk in coolers to
prevent smelling during the summer and mix the compost regularly. After it is mixed and
screened by campus employees, it is stored until the next spring to ensure that the fertilizer
13
Carleton College
Ibid
15
Compost Process
16
Ibid
14
9
would be nutrient rich and high quality. Borough State College has a long standing compost
program; it began in 1991 and grew quickly from there.17 The whole community is involved in
their composting efforts. Borough College expanded their first program to add grass clippings
mixed with the leaves. The combination was mixed into a 1:3 grass-to-leaves ratio and is turned
three times a week with a compost turner.18 “The additional nitrogen content of the leaves sped
up compost production; instead of two years, compost was considered finished in approximately
nine to ten weeks.”19 Then the school added food waste or an “organics recycling element” to
their program. Clearly there are sustainability projects occurring in universities across the
country. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute should be taking greater steps towards becoming a
more sustainable campus because it is more than feasible, it is necessary.
Rationale
The Campus Composting Initiative is a priority for RPI for the main reason of creating a
cleaner, more sustainable campus. Project CCI will have an impact on the short term as well as
the long term. In the short term the project would start diverging waste from landfills as well as
start a compost system. Another short term goal would be to divert the waste that is produced in
the dining halls from napkins and paper towels that can be composted. Through the placement
of more receptacles around campus separating trash and compostable materials, students would
become more aware of what their wastes actually are. As it is today, at Rensselaer the average
daily food waste is about 600 lbs.[1] there would be a personal sense of actually putting
something in a compost bin, recycling it back to the environment versus the trash bin that leads
directly to landfills. A long term goal would be using the compost made as a fertilizer in the
17
Welcome to an Engaged Community
Ibid
19
Ibid
18
10
spring for revitalizing the campus and its plants. The fertilizer could also be a part of increasing
the use of green roofs around campus. RPI has a green roof on the student union but could be
implemented on many other buildings. There is no requirement for a flat roof in order to
implement green roofs. They would be a larger step towards a more sustainable campus. Green
roofs could possibly put on residence halls which allows easy access to roofs and could help with
heating costs. With the implementation of the Campus Composting Initiative, Rensselaer
Polytechnic Institute would save money in the long term with using compostable wastes that are
created on campus, as fertilizer and removing them from the landfills. With the support of the
alumni, students, and school officials the Campus Composting Initiative would lead the way
cleaning up RPI and ensuring Rensselaer’s sustainability legacy.
Project Design and Context
Several kinds of expertise are going to be needed to complete Project CCI. Somebody
with experience in composting, an accountant, and people who can assemble a green roof will
be required in order to complete the project. Also, the project will need the support and
assistance of the student body and staff in order for the project to be a success.
A number of tasks need to be completed in order for Project CCI to be implemented.
Although not necessarily in this order, the following tasks must be completed to implement the
idea: gain RPI’s financial support; establish a composting site in the selected location; spread the
word about Project CCI; hiring the necessary staff (accountant, construction workers); decide
what buildings will get a green roof; and explain to the janitorial staff what will be needed of
them.
11
To carry out Project CCI, roles must be assumed in order to get everything needed. One
person is going to be in charge of is going to be in charge of the composting part of Project CCI.
He or she will tell the janitors what this composting will require from them, will help choose the
optimum composting site location, and will figure out what infrastructure is required for RPI to
establish a compost site here on campus. Another person will manage the finances and data of
the project. He or she is going to hire an accountant to keep track of the costs of everything, and
record significant information related to the project; for example, the date that the first roof
underwent construction. More importantly, he or she is going to try to get RPI’s financial
support, or aid from another source, so that the project can be afforded. The third person is
going to be in charge of the green roofs. He or she will work with RPI administration to decide
what buildings will get green roofs, decide what plants should be utilized on the roof, and be
responsible for hiring personnel who can assemble said roof. The fourth person will be in charge
of essentially the public relations department. He or she may put up fliers and advertisements
about Project CCI, and inform people of what the project is doing, how, and why.
The key phases of the project will be when RPI decides to sponsor the project,
establishing a compost pile, and the implementation of the green roofs. As of right now, the
schedule goes as follows: gain RPI’s financial support, establish the compost pile, establish the
composting system inside of dining halls and begin constructing the first green roof. From there,
more compost will be added to the pile, and a few more roofs will be constructed.
Gaining funding for this project is going to be the most challenging part since Project
CCI is going to fairly costly. Installing a green roof is twice as costly as having a black tar roof
installed, although they are cheaper in the long run because of the amount of money saved in
12
energy.20 If Project CCI is unable to get funding from RPI in order to implement the solution,
the project may be able to get funding elsewhere. There may be a grant that could fund the
project, or possibly some alumni would be interested enough to donate money to the project. A
fundraiser or asking for donations are also possibilities if RPI decides not to fund the idea.
Troy has a budding composting initiative. As of now, a group called Troy Compost
collects produce scraps at the farmer’s market on Saturday mornings and uses them for small
scale composting. The group is trying to implement a more-established way to get more citizens
involved and actively participating in sorting their food scraps. They hope to one day establish a
city-wide collection system. Nearby, there is Schenectady County’s Composting and Recycling
Facility. By using Schenectady as an example, one day, Troy might have a composting
collection system of its own. RPI producing its own compost is beneficial since it can also
double as a fertilizer, and this will save the city money because it will no longer need to spend as
much on the money directed towards fertilizer as of right now.
The key stakeholders involved with RPI’s sustainability are the students and staff of RPI
because they are on this campus every day and are the main producers of all of the waste.
Students and staff use the buildings, the bathrooms and thus use paper towels. Project CCI
would allow people to see how their waste is disposed. In this case, the waste will essentially
turn into beautiful gardens growing on top of buildings that double as an insulator, thus making
the buildings more environmentally friendly.
Everyone is a stakeholder in this project because everyone takes part as a user of this
college campus. By educating individuals on how composting works, they will be more apt to
actually helping out, and will advocate for this system change. Students and faculty will need to
be involved in educating others on the topic of how to compost. One of the biggest issues when
20
Klinkenborg
13
implementing a new system such as composting is a lack of information from the administration
to the general public. If the students, faculty, and staff are unaware of the implemented change,
they will hinder the system of composting from actually working, by not placing their
disposables in the correct waste receptacles. Another way to involve stakeholders, such as
administration who might control the budget for similar improvement projects, would be to
present clear data as to why composting would be more efficient for the RPI campus rather than
sending waste to landfills. Trends have shown that composting in the long run saves money,
since cities don’t have to pay as much if they compost their waste. In Berkeley, CA, “Recology
collects $33.50 per ton [of compost] hauled” while on the Recology website, it states that it costs
“$147.13 per ton of garbage waste collected.”21 22 That is a difference of $113.63 saved when
the waste is composted, instead of being sent to a landfill. In this specific scenario, a developed
composting system had already been established and integrated into the waste collection system.
This is just to show that in the long run, composting will pay off by not only being cheaper than
sending waste to landfills, but also put less of a toll on the environment, since it effectively cuts
down on the production of greenhouse gas emissions. And there is promise for harvesting biogas
from compost heaps, since it is not contaminated with toxic chemicals like landfill gas is. With
the harvested biogas, RPI could use it as an alternative to natural gas for a source of energy. To
create this pile of compost, RPI could use the tossed napkins and food scraps from dining halls as
well as all the clippings and dead leaves from the multitude of plants on campus.
One cultural trend that will greatly affect the achievability of the project is the disposable
culture that RPI students partake in daily. The need for convenience of food and mentality to
buy impulsively has allowed for the thriving of companies to keep selling items that are over-
21
22
Sanders, Robert
Recology
14
packaged or superfluous. Some items are made to be breakable, so consumers go out and buy
even more things that are not needed. This culture of excess, of overconsumption and waste, has
led to the realization that a solution to divert the waste produced needs to happen now. Even if
the diverted waste is as simple as napkins, if they are composted instead of sent to a landfill, will
equate to a major difference, not only environmentally but economically. A social effect that
may benefit this composting initiative is the resurgence of “green is good.” Individuals are
beginning to realize that by continuing to live overly wasteful and excessive lifestyles, there will
be a lack of resources in the long run to use. Instead of making everything from new materials.
items labeled with “made from 20% recycled material” or “post consumer fibers” are advertised
as positives. There is a flip side of this current social mindset, since there are people out there
who deny the effects of climate change, or simply do not see how their individual actions will
impact the system as a whole. Because of differing idea sets, some individuals will not
cooperate with this change that the project brings, thus acting as a barrier for this project to be
implemented successfully.
Some significant barriers to developing Project CCI would be the development of
composting infrastructure at RPI. That development of infrastructure entails major costs that a
student run organization cannot cover, and would most likely have to be funded by grants,
donations, or by the institute itself. The initial cost for the purchase of in-vessel composters can
range from $18,000-$75,000. By presenting the need for on-campus composters, and explaining
the benefits of having one, such as low odor, low maintenance, and efficient use of space to
make the most amount of compost, the project could hopefully obtain funding for the
implementation of composters on campus. Project CCI would also need to explicitly present the
energy efficiency and other benefits of establishing green roofs on campus, and obtaining
15
funding for that. Another significant barrier would be getting individuals to cooperate and
partake in sorting their waste. In Commons Dining Hall, students already separate paper napkin
waste into a specific disposal unit. By creating similar sorting systems, the project can overcome
this barrier of non-participation.
The success of the project will be evaluated once the RPI administration approves of the
project, thus allowing for the establishment of a working compost collection and processing
system. The collected compost waste would ideally be composted on campus, inside in-vessel
composters. By having it on site, the project ensures that RPI will get to benefit from the rich
compost that is being produced after collecting all the napkins and food scraps from the
restrooms, dining halls and residence halls. The produced fertilizer from the composted
materials would be used to fertilize the greenhouses and green roofs around campus. If it is
taken by an outside company who would process it, the project would only be half successful,
since the second half of the project was to implement an on-site composting facility. However,
getting RPI to participate in the collection of its compostable material by an outside company
could help promote local compost companies and would make the process of diverting waste a
lot less costly for RPI to do. This is the second half of the process – to establish more sources of
plant growth on campus. By integrating green roofs onto suitable buildings, they will act as a
layer of insulation, which will help regulate the indoor temperatures of the buildings, ultimately
reducing the overall energy costs to heat and cool the buildings. Having both compost collection
and processing on campus with the development of green roofs, RPI will be more sustainable.
If the project is successful, it will address the sustainability problem of excess and unnecessary
waste on campus. It will also address energy efficiency problems on campus. The compost heap
can be a source of biogas to be used as fuel, and the green roofs will help lower the amount of
16
energy used to cool buildings. By providing a way to divert organic waste from landfills into a
system where the end products can naturally be made into new resources is a success in itself.
Turning waste into a reusable product is a cost effective and environmentally conscious idea. It
will be sustainable economically, since the newly established compost system will pay for itself
in the long run, when compared to the costs for waste removal. And composting to provide
fertilizer for the green areas on campus is sustainable environmentally, since it will allow for the
diversion of usage of chemical products to enhance the plant life. By addressing waste and
energy issues, our project does address several sustainability issues that are prevalent on campus.
Closing
If Project CCI is successful, food waste from the dining halls will be composted and
would then be regenerated to help new plants grow – a complete circle of life for a plant – death
to decay to regrowth. That is the epitome of sustainable living. Making students understand the
purpose and benefits of composting food waste would be the most difficult step, but once past
that, the Rensselaer campus would be a much more sustainable campus if a compost system
could effectively be implemented. According to the UC Berkeley article “On America Recycles
Day, EPA Recognizes Campus Food Waste Reduction,” “Americans waste 40% of the food we
buy – 34 million tons annually.”23 That is a huge number and expected to grow even larger if
campuses across the country do not begin living more sustainable lifestyles. More sustainable
living in necessary if the amount of landfills is expected to even off, if the cost of gas is expected
to drop, if climate change is expected to slow, and if the earth is expected to be a greener,
healthier place. Humans tend to want all of these things to happen without doing anything to get
there, but that is never going to work out and since college students are truly the movement
23
Sanders, Robert
17
makers of tomorrow, it only seems right that one of the biggest waste-reduction pushes occurs on
college campuses. Composting is not a difficult task and it can truly make all the difference.
Many schools have already begun to implement a composting system as well as other methods of
green living such as getting rid of trays, changing and/or eliminating the types of containers used
for food takeout, utilizing single-stream recycling (all recyclables can go into one recycling bin),
electronics recycling, and a larger effort has been made to reduce the level of light consumption
by not using lights during day-time classes if the classrooms have windows (same applies to
dining halls). Rensselaer already utilizes single-stream recycling, is considering eliminating
trays entirely in all dining halls, and has already eliminated them in two so far, and so taking on a
composting site on campus would only go with the newest RPI trend of being clean, green, and
sustainable. Once RPI successfully educates the student body and faculty on the need for
composting on campus and how the compost can then be redirected to help elsewhere on
campus, the composting effort in dining halls will be successful. A greener, more sustainable
campus is purely a happier, healthier campus and what more could a school whose motto is
“Why not change the world?” truly want.
18
Works Cited
BioCycle. Advertisement. JG Press Inc., Mar. 2011. Web. 14 Nov. 2013.
<http://cwmi.css.cornell.edu/invesselcomposting.pdf>.
Carleton College.”: Sustainability: Community Waste Program. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
Chappell, Bill. "Dirty Diapers Pile Up In Portland Recycling Bins: 'It's Not Pretty'" NPR. NPR,
15 May 2013. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
"Compost Process." Compost Process | Middlebury. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
"Dump & Run." Dump & Run - Trash into Cash for Nonprofits. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
Howard, Brian C. "How Cities Compost Mountains of Food Waste." National Geographic18
June 2013: n. pag. Web. 5 Nov. 2013.
<http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/06/130618-food-waste-composting-nycsan-francisco/>.
Jameson, Charlotte. "Youth Fighting Food Waste on College Campuses | Food Tank." Food
Tank RSS. Food Tank, 21 Apr. 2013. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
Klinkenborg, Verlyn. "Green Roofs." — National Geographic Magazine. National Geographic,
May 2009. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.
Murphy, Melissa. "How to Use Compost to Heat Water." SFgate.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 12
Nov. 2013. <http://homeguides.sfgate.com/use-compost-heat-water-78520.html>.
"Operations and Sustainability." RPI Sustainability Clearinghouse. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Nov.
2013.
Raju, Reenu, Peter Ko, Danielle Reid, Nick Troy, Franklin Regan, and Paul Chando. Office for
Sustainability at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Rep. N.p., Spring 2003. Web. 15 Nov.
2013.
19
Recology. Advertisement. Recologysf.com. Recology, n.d. Web. 15 Nov. 2013.
<http://www.recologysf.com/index.php/for-homes/transfer-station-residential>.
"Resources." Benefits of Including Paper in Composting. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Nov.
2013.<http://compostingcouncil.org/?resources=benefits-of-including-paper-incomposting/>.
Rosenau, Jim. "Where Does Berkeley’s Green Waste Go? | Berkeleyside."Berkeleyside.com.
N.p., 23 June 2011. Web. 18 Nov. 2013.
Sanders, Robert. "On America Recycles Day, EPA Recognizes Campus Food Waste Reduction."
UC Berkeley NewsCenter. UC Berkeley NewsCenter, 15 Nov. 2012. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
“Sustainability: Bathroom Composting”: Carleton College. N.p., 15 Oct. 2013. Web. 12 Nov.
2013. <http://apps.carleton.edu/sustainability/campus/waste/bathroom_composting/>.
"Types of Composting." EPA. Environmental Protection Agency, 17 Oct. 2013. Web. 21 Nov.
2013. <http://www.epa.gov/compost/types.htm>.
"Welcome to an Engaged Community." Borough of State College Government. N.p., n.d. Web.
12 Nov. 2013.
20