Clarifying Document

advertisement

INDIAN EDUCATION FOR ALL AND OTHER DIVERSITY-RELATED HIGHLIGHTS FROM

EDUC 497 PK-8 READING METHODS - BRAYKO

SPRING 2013

A NOTE TO REVIEWERS: My name is Kate Brayko. I am a new faculty member at UM, and this is my first semester teaching Reading Methods here. I have a deep passion for Indian Education, the teaching/learning of English language learners, and school-community partnerships.

I made numerous changes to the previous reading methods course (the syllabi you read previously). This table includes some of the ways that IEFA was engaged in the Reading Methods course this spring so far. I also include some information about work we’ve done in the course that has focused on preparing candidates to work with students with diverse backgrounds and learning strengths/needs.

MODELING/SIMULATION OF TEACHING METHODS USING IEFA-RELATED TEXTS AND LITERACIES

Pedagogical focus Artifact

Critical literacy/Writing to Learn

The Day the Columbia Ran Backward (Celilo Falls fishing/damming the Columbia)

Candidates participated in a simulation of a pre-reading “writing to learn” strategy that promotes critical literacy; this involved the viewing of photographs of Umatilla and Yakama fisherman at Celilo Falls, watching a film in which the Native communities’ perspectives were represented, and a critical analysis of the issue.

Critical literacy/reading-writing connections/argumentative writing

“Take a Stand” activity to facilitate deliberation and argumentative writing

Crow and Hawk (Pueblo)

Candidates participated in a simulated lesson; I read aloud Crow and Hawk, and after considering multiple perspectives in the story’s dilemma, students physically positioned themselves on a continuum. They engaged in spirited deliberation, which led into an argumentative writing activity.

Critical literacy/before reading strategies (content area literacy)

Carousel activity associated with Rethinking Columbus curriculum

Candidates participated in a simulation of a prereading strategy called a “carousel.”

In small groups, they traveled to four posters hung around the classroom; each poster had a question about Columbus and/or the Tainos. This was intended to expose students to activities that activate/build background knowledge, surface misunderstandings, and promote the consideration of critically considering multiple perspectives.

ASSIGNMENTS FOR WHICH STUDENTS USED IEFA-RELATED TEXTS OR LITERACIES

Assignments

Explicit comprehension strategy lesson

Sequoyah: The Cherokee Man Who Gave His People Writing

Anticipation guide/Questioning the Author

Many students used Montana History textbook chapter “People of the Dog Days”

(about people who lived in the Ice Age in what is now Montana, oral histories)

Artifact 1-Powerpoint slides

Artifact 2-Candidate crit literacy/ writing-to-learn template

Artifact 3-Powerpoint slides

Artifact 4- Powerpoint slide

Artifact 5-Photos of carousel posters

Artifacts

Artifact 6- Comp strategy lesson assignment description

Artifact 7- Challenging text assignment description

OTHER IN-CLASS ACTIVITIES FOCUSED ON IEFA POLICY

Activities Artifacts

Candidates explored language arts (and other subject area) lessons on OPI website.

They selected and brought in lessons that they hoped to utilize in fieldwork/student teaching. They engaged in discussion about how, specifically, each lesson engaged one or more of the Essential Understandings.

Artifact 8 - Powerpoint slides

Artifact 9 - Essential

Understanding charts with OPI

IEFA lesson descriptions posted

Candidates engaged in group discussions about IEFA implementation in a reading classroom.

These discussions focused on texts (and resources for vetting text, etc.), critical literacy, partnering with Native Community Specialists and other tribal members/Native teachers and leaders, research on teacher expectations of students of color/importance of teacher expectations for student learning, positionality/privilege .

See Artifact 8

DIVERSE LEARNERS AND LEARNING STRENGTHS/NEEDS

This course has a very strong focus on learning about learners, and providing reading instruction that is responsive to the needs of students. This was infused throughout the course. Candidates learned about and practiced a range of teaching strategies for fostering phonological awareness, phonics, oral language, fluency, comprehension, critical literacy, deep reading of literary and nonfiction text. For example, they practiced analytic and synthetic approaches to teaching phonics—both with a strong emphasis on formative assessment so that they carefully noted the extent to which a particular approach was effective for different individual students. There were many examples of this kind of work in the course, so I don’t include all of my course PowerPoints, lesson descriptions, etc. However, in the table below I list a few examples of activities/assignments that require candidates to attend to diverse learners.

Evidence

Artifact 10 - Assessment assignment description

Activity/Assignment

Assessment assignment in the field

Candidates are asked to learn more about one child and his/her reading. This also includes inquiry into a child’s background, interest, family, strengths. Candidates make instructional recommendations based on what they learn in the assessment and in their interviewing/learning about the child.

Lesson plan assignments in the field

Candidates are asked to design and implement lesson plans in their placement classrooms. These assignments include a prompt for candidates to consider diversity in their classroom – a range of backgrounds and needs—and explain how the instruction they design in the lesson plan responds to this.

Field Journal prompts

The prompts for journal entries during candidates 400 block practicum engage topics like working with families, evaluating curriculum materials (cultural representations, accommodating for diverse learners, etc.), closely studying individual students, etc.

Student case analyses

Artifact 11 - Artifact Lesson plan assignment description

Artifact 12 – Journal prompt assignment description

Candidates created and read cases of students with a range of backgrounds and literacy interests, learning preferences, reading profiles; candidates analyzed these student cases and made instructional recommendations.

Artifact 13 - Case study instructional recommendation sheet (hard copy on display)

Download