BIBLIOGRAPHY ON INTELLECTUAL HISTORY METHODOLOGIES
Compiled by Mikkel Thorup (August 2013)
Please feel free to circulate.
Any corrections or suggestions to the list can be made to idemt@hum.au.dk.
The principle for inclusion on the list is texts dealing with methodological aspects of intellectual
history and/or intellectual historians. The principle of presentation is chronology.
Journals

Lychnos. An annual for history of ideas and science, 1936-

Journal of the History of Ideas, 1940-

Intellectual History Newsletter, 1979-2002

History of European Ideas, 1980-

Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, 1983-

ARR, 1989-

Intellectual History Review, 1996-

The European Legacy, 1996-

Redescriptions, 1997-

History of Intellectual Culture, 2001-

Partial Answers. Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas, 2003-

Modern Intellectual History, 2004-

Contributions, 2005-

Ideas in History, 2006-

Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte, 2007-

Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 2012-
1
Literature

Arthur O. Lovejoy, The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the History of an Idea, Cambridge,
Mass. & London: Harvard University Press 1936

Arthur O. Lovejoy, “The Historiography of Ideas”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical
Society, vol. 78, no. 4, 1938, pp. 529-543

R.G. Collingwood, An Autobiography, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Reflections on the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol.
1, no. 1, 1940, pp. 3-23

R.G. Collingwood, The Idea of History, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1946

Franklin L. Baumer, “Intellectual History and its Problems”, Journal of Modern History, vol.
21, no. 3, 1949, pp. 191-203

John Higham, “The Rise of American Intellectual History”, American Historical Review, April,
1951, pp. 453-471

George Boas et.al., Studies in Intellectual History, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
1953

Peter Laslett, “Introduction”, in John Locke, Two Treatises of Government, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press 1960

Crane Brinton, “Introduction”, in Brinton, Ideas and Men. The Story of Western Thought,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall 1963, 2. ed.

Maurice Mandelbaum, “The History of Ideas, Intellectual History, and the History of
Philosophy”, History and Theory, 1965, pp. 33-66

R.S. Crane, “Philosophy, Literature, and the History of Ideas”, in Crane, The Idea of the
Humanities and other Essays Critical and Historical, vol. 1, Chicago & London: University of
Chicago Press 1967

Peter Gay, “The Social History of Ideas: Ernst Cassirer and After”, in Kurt H. Wolff &
Barrington Moore (eds.), The Critical Spirit. Essays in Honor of Herbert Marcuse, Boston:
Beacon Press 1967

Louis O. Mink, “Change and Causality in the History of Ideas”, Eighteenth-Century Studies,
1968, pp. 7-25

Johannes Sløk, Hvad er idehistorie? Et programskrift, København: Gyldendal 1968

John Dunn, “The Identity of the History of Ideas”, Philosophy, April 1968, pp. 85-103
2

Johannes Sløk, Fylde eller tomhed, København: Gyldendal 1968

Georg Boas, The History of ideas. An Introduction, New York: Charles Schribner’s Sons

Klaus
von
Beyme,
Politische
Ideengeschichte.
Probleme
eines
interdisziplinären
Forschungsbereiches, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) 1969

John Higham, “Part II: Polarities in Intellectual History, chap. 2. Intellectual History and its
Neighbors; 3. The Study of American Intellectual History”, in Higham, Writing American
History. Essays on Modern Scholarship, Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press
1970

Felix Gilbert, “Intellectual History: Its Aims and Methods”, in Gilbert & Stephen R. Graubard
(eds.), Historical Studies Today, New York: W.W. Norton & Co 1972

Reinhart Koselleck, “Einleitung”, in Otto Brunner, Werner Conze & Reinhart Koselleck (eds.),
Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexicon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in
Deutschland, vol. 1, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta 1972

Hayden White, The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe, Baltimore &
London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1973

Philip P. Wiener, “Towards Commemorating the Centenary of Arthur O. Lovejoy’s Birthday
(October 10, 1873)”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 34, no. 4, 1973, pp. 591-598

Philip P. Wiener, “Preface”, in Wiener (ed.), Dictionary of the History of Ideas, New York:
Charles Schribner 1973

F. E. L. Priestly, “Mapping the World of Ideas. Review of the Dictionary of the History of
Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 35, 1973, pp. 527-537

Gordon J. Schochet, “Quentin Skinner’s Method”, Political Theory, vol. 2, no. 3, 1974, pp. 261276

Quentin Skinner, “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action”, Political
Theory, vol. 2, no. 3, 1974, pp. 277-303

Masao Maruyama, Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan, Princeton University
Press 1974 [1940-44], “Introduction”

Gerald Izenberg, “Psychohistory and Intellectual History”, History and Theory, vol. 14, 1975,
pp. 139-155

Arnaldo Momigliano, “A Piedmontese View of the History of Ideas”, in Momigliano, Essays in
Ancient and Modern Historiography, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1977
3

Michel Foucault, “History of Systems of Thought”, in Donald F. Bouchard (ed.), Michel
Foucault. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Selected Essays and Interviews, Ithaca & New
York: Cornell University Press 1977

Sande Cohen, “Structuralism and the Writing of Intellectual History”, History and Theory, vol.
17, nr. 2, 1978, s. 175-206

Hayden White, Tropics of Discourse. Essays in Cultural Criticism, Baltimore & London: Johns
Hopkins University Press 1978

Leonard Krieger, “The Autonomy of Intellectual History”, in Georg G. Iggers & Harold T.
Parker (eds.), International Handbook of Historical Studies, Westport, Ct.: Metheuen 1979

John Higham & Paul K. Conkin (eds.), New Directions in American Intellectual History,
Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1979

Laurence Veysey, “Intellectual History and the New Social History”

Gordon S. Wood, “Intellectual History and the Social Sciences”

David A. Hollinger, “Historians and the Discourse of Intellectuals”

Rush Welter, On Studying the National Mind”

Sacvan Bercovitch, “New England’s Errand Reappraised”

Henry F. May, “Intellectual History and Religious History”

Dorothy Ross, “The Liberal Tradition Revisited and the Republican Tradition
Addressed”

Thomas L. Haskell, “Deterministic Implications of Intellectual History”

Murray G. Murphey, “The Place of Beliefs in Modern Culture”

David D. Hall, “The World of Print and Collective Mentality in SeventeenthCentury New England”

Thomas Bender, “The Cultures of Intellectual Life: The City and the
Professions”


Neil Harris, “Iconography and Intellectual History: the Half-Tone Effect”

Warren I. Susman, “’Personality’ and the Making of Twentieth-Century Culture”
John Dunn, “The Identity of the History of Ideas”, in Dunn, Political Obligation in its
Historical Context. Essays in Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1980

Daniel J. Wilson, Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Quest for Intelligibility, N.C: Chapel Hill 1980
4

Robert Darnton, “Intellectual and Cultural History”, chap. 14 in Michael Kammen (ed.), The
Past Before Us. Contemporary Historical Writing in the United States, Ithaca & London:
Cornell University Press 1980

William J. Bouwsma, “Intellectual History in the 1980s: From the History of Ideas to the
History of Meaning”, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, vol. 12, no. 2, 1981, pp. 279-291

J.G.A. Pocock, “The Reconstruction of Discourse: Towards the Historiography of Political
Thought”, Modern Language Notes, vol. 96, no. 5, 1981, pp. 959-980

Michel Foucault, “The Order of Discourse”, in Robert Young (ed.), Untying the Text: A PostStructuralist Reader, Boston, London & Henley: Routledge & Kegan Pail 1981

Joel Colton, “Intellectual History in the 1980s: The Case for the Defense”, Journal of
Interdisciplinary History, vol. 12, no. 2, 1981, pp. 293-298

J.G.A. Pocock, “Afterword: The Machiavellian Moment Revisited: A Study in History and
Ideology”, Journal of Modern History, vol. 53, 1981, pp. 49-72

Ernst Schulin, “German ‘Geistesgeschichte’, American ‘Intellectual History’ and French
‘Historie des Mentalités’ since 1900. A Comparison”, History of European Ideas, vol. 1, no. 3,
1981, pp. 195-214

Dominick LaCapra & Steven L. Kaplan (eds.), Modern European Intellectual History.
Reappraisals and New Perspectives, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press 1982

Roger Chartier, “Intellectual History or Sociocultural History? The French
Trajectories”

Dominick LaCapra, “Rethinking Intellectual History and Reading Texts”

Martin Jay, “Should Intellectual History Take a Linguistic Turn? Reflections on
the Habermas-Gadamer Debate”

Hans Kellner, “Triangular Anxieties: The Present State of European Intellectual
History”

Mark Poster, “The Future According to Foucault: The Archeology of Knowledge
and Intellectual History”

E.M. Henning, “Archeology, Deconstruction, and Intellectual History”

Keith Michael Baker, “On the Problem of the Ideological Origins of the French
Revolution”

Peter Jelavich, “Popular Dimensions of Modernist Elite Culture: The Case of
Theater in Fin-de-Siècle Munich”
5

David James Fisher, “Reading Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents”

Hayden White, “Method and Ideology in Intellectual History: The Case of Henry
Adams”

Dominick LaCapra, Rethinking Intellectual History. Texts, Contexts, Language, Ithaca &
London: Cornell University Press 1983

Dominick LaCapra, “Intellectual History and Defining the Present as ‘Postmodern’”, in Ihab
Hassan & Sally Hassan (eds.), Innovation/Renovation. New Perspectives on the Humanities,
Madison: University of Wisconsin Press 1983

Stefano Collini, Donald Winch & John Burrow, “The Governing Science: Things Political and
the Intellectual Historian”, in Collini, Winch & Burrow, That Noble Science of Politics. A Study
in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983

Preston King (ed.), The History of Ideas. An Introduction to Method, London & Canberra:
Croom Helm 1983


Preston King, “Introduction”

Preston King, “Thinking Past a Problem”

Michael Oakeshott, “The Activity of Being an Historian”

Preston King, “Michael Oakeshott and Historical Particularism”

R.G. Collingwood, “The Historical Logic of Question and Answer”

Leo Strauss, “On Collingwood’s Philosophy of History”

A.O. Lovejoy, “The Study of the History of Ideas”

Maurice Mandelbaum, “On Lovejoy’s Historiography”

Leo Strauss, “Political Philosophy and History”

John G. Gunnell, “The Myth of the Tradition”

Quentin Skinner, “Conventions and the Understanding of Speech Acts”

Preston King, “The Theory of Context and the Case of Hobbes”
John Patrick Diggins, “The Oyster and the Pearl: The Problem of Contextualism in Intellectual
History”, History and Theory, vol. 23, no. 2, 1984, pp. 151-169

Iain Hampsher-Monk, “Political Languages in Time: The Work of J.G.A. Pocock”, British
Journal of Political Science, vol. 14, 1984, pp. 159-174

Richard Rorty, “The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres”, in Rorty, J.B. Schneewind &
Quentin Skinner, Philosophy in History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984
6

Peter L. Janssen, “Political Thought as Traditionary Action: The Critical Response to Skinner
and Pocock”, History and Theory, vol. 24, 1985, pp. 115-146

David Boucher, Texts in Context. Revisionist Methods for Studying the History of Ideas,
Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1985

Conal Condren, The Study and Appraisal of Classic Texts. An Essay on Political Theory, Its
Inheritance, and the History of Ideas, Princeton: Princeton University Press 1985

Rolf Reichardt, “Einleitung”, in Reichardt & Eberhard Schmitt (eds.), Handbuch politischsozialer Grundbegriffe in Frankreich 1680-1820, München: R. Oldenbourg Verlag 1985

Michael Ermarth, “Mindful Matters: The Empire’s New Codes and the Plight of Modern
European Intellectual History”, Journal of Modern History, vol. 57, no. 3, 1985, pp. 506-527

Stefano Collini, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 46-48

Michael Biddiss , “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 49-50

Quentin Skinner, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 50-52

J.G.A. Pocock, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 52-53

Bruce Kuklick, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 53

Michael Hunter, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 53-54

J.G.A. Pocock, “Introduction: The State of the Art”, in Pocock, Virtue, Commerce, and History.
Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press 1985

David A. Hollinger, In the American Province. Studies in the History and Historiography of
Ideas, Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1985

Reinhart Koselleck, “Sozialgeschichte und Begriffsgeschichte”, in Wolfgang Schieder & Volker
Sellin (eds.), Sozialgeschichte in Deutschland, vol. 1, Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht 1986

Melvin Richter, “History (Begriffsgeschichte) and Political Theory”, Political Theory, vol. 14,
no. 4, 1986, pp. 604-637

Donald R. Kelley, “Horizons of Intellectual History: Retrospect, Circumspect, Prospect”,
Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 48, no. 1, 1987, pp. 143-169

P. & m. Kuntz (eds.), The Great Chain of Being after Fifty Years, New York

Daniel J. Wilson, “Lovejoy’s The Great Chain of Being after Fifty Years”, Journal of the
History of Ideas, 1987, pp. 187-205
7

Gladys Gordon-Bournique, “A.O. Lovejoy and the ‘History of Ideas’”, Journal of the History of
Ideas, 1987, pp. 207-210

Edward P. Mahoney, “Lovejoy and the Hierarchy of Being”, Journal of the History of Ideas,
1987, pp. 211-230

Francis Oakley, “Lovejoy’s Unexplored Option”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1987, pp.
231-245

John E. Toews, “Intellectual History after the Linguistic Turn: The Autonomy of Meaning and
the Irreducibility of Experience”, American Historical Review, vol. 92, 1987, pp. 879-907

Hayden White, The Content of the Form. Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation,
Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1987

Martin Jay, “Two Cheers for Paraphrase: The Confessions of a Synoptic Intellectual Historian”,
in Jay, Fin de Siècle Socialism and other essays, New York & London: Routledge 1988

Anthony Pagden, “Rethinking the Linguistic Turn: Current Anxieties in Intellectual History”,
Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 49, no. 3, 1988, pp. 519-529

Michel de Certeau, The Writing of History, New York: Columbia University Press 1988

Roger Chartier, Cultural History. Between Practices and Representations, Cambridge: Polity
Press 1988

James Tully (ed.), Meaning and Context. Quentin Skinner and his Critics, Cambridge: Polity
1988

James Tully, “The Pen is a Mighty Sword: Quentin Skinner’s Analysis of
Politics”

Quentin Skinner, “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas”

Quentin Skinner, “Motives, Intentions and the Interpretation of Texts”

Quentin Skinner, “’Social Meaning’ and the Explanation of Social Action”

Quentin Skinner, “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and
Action”

Quentin Skinner, “Language and Social Change”

Martin Hollis, “Say It with Flowers”

Keith Graham, “How do Illocutionary Descriptions Explain?”

Joseph V. Femia, “An Historicist Critique of ‘Revisionist’ Methods for
Studying”
8

Kenneth Minogue, “Method in Intellectual History: Quentin Skinner’s
Foundations”


Nathan Tarcov, “Quentin Skinner’s Method and Machiavelli’s Prince”

John Keane, “More Theses on the Philosophy of History”

Charles Taylor, “The Hermeneutics of Conflict”

Quentin Skinner, “A Reply to my Critics”
Reinhart Koselleck, “Linguistic Change and the History of Events”, Journal of Modern History,
vol. 61, December 1989, pp. 649-666

Lloyd S. Kramer, “Literature, Criticism, and Historical Imagination: The Literary Challenge of
Hayden White and Dominick LaCapra”, in Lynn Hunt (ed.), The New Cultural History,
Berkeley: University of California Press 1989

Quentin Skinner, “Language and Political Change”, in Terence Ball, James Farr & Rusell L.
Hansen (eds.), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press 1989

James Farr, “Understanding Conceptual Change Politically” ”, in Terence Ball, James Farr &
Rusell L. Hansen (eds.), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press 1989

Dominick LaCapra, “Intellectual History and Critical Theory”, in LaCapra, Soundings in
Critical Theory, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press 1989

Kack Liveley & Andrew Reeve, “General Introduction”, in Liveley & Reeve (eds.), Modern
Political Theory from Hobbes to Marx. Key Debates, London & New York: Routledge 1989

David Harlan, “Intellectual History and the Return of Literature”, American Historical Review,
vol. 94, 1989, pp. 581-609

Keith Tribe, “The Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe Project: From History of Ideas to Conceptual
History. A Review Article”, Comparative Studies in Society, vol. 31, 1989, pp. 180-184

Reinhart Koselleck, ”Social History and Conceptual History”, International Journal of Politics,
Culture and Society, vol. 2, no. 3, 1990, pp. 308-325

Reinhart Koselleck, “Sprogændring og begivenhedshistorie”, Den jyske historiker, vol. 50,
1990, pp. 121-135

Robert Darnton, The Kiss of Lamourette. Reflections on Cultural History, New York & London:
W.W. Norton & Co 1990
9

Lars-Henrik Schmidt, “Den interpreterende konstruktion”, Den Jyske Historiker, no. 50, 1990,
pp. 55-64

Fritz Ringer, ”The Intellectual Field, Intellectual History, and the Sociology of Knowledge”,
Theory & Society, vol. 19, 1990, pp. 269-294

Charles Lemert, “The Habits of Intellectuals. Response to Ringer”, Theory & Society, vol. 19,
1990, pp. 295-310

Martin Jay, “Fieldwork and Theorizing in Intellectual History. A Reply to Fritz Ringer”, Theory
& Society, vol. 19, 1990, pp. 311-321

Fritz Ringer, “Rejoinder to Charles Lemert and Martin Jay”, Theory & Society, vol. 19, 1990,
pp. 323-334

Melvin Richter, “Reconstructing the History of Political Languages: Pocock, Skinner, and the
Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe”, History and Theory, vol. 29, no. 1, 1990, pp. 38-70

Donald R. Kelley, “What is Happening to the History of Ideas?”, Journal of the History of
Ideas, vol. 51, no. 1, 1990, pp. 3-25

Donald R. Kelley, The History of Ideas. Canon and Variations, Rochester: University of
Rochester Press 1900

Donald R. Kelley, “Introduction: Reflections on a Canon”

Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Reflections on the History of Ideas”

Frederick J. Teggart, “A Problem in the History of Ideas”

Leo Spitzer, “Geistesgeschichte vs. History of Ideas as Apllied to Hitlerism”

Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Reply to Professor Spitzer”

Theodore Spencer, “Lovejoy’s ‘Essays in the History of Ideas’”

Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Historiography and Evaluation: A Disclaimer”

Abraham Edel, “Levels of Meaning and the History of Ideas”

Paul O. Kristeller, “The Philosophical Significance of the History of Thought”

Philip P. Wiener, “Logical Significance of the History of Thought”

Joseph Anthony Mazzeo, “Some Interpretations of the History of Ideas”

Leonard Krieger, “The Autonomy of Intellectual History”

Daniel J. Wilson, “Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Moral of ‘The Great Chain of
Veing’”

Kathleen E. Duffin, “Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Emergence of Novelty”

Daniel J. Wilson, “Lovejoy’s ‘The Great Chain of Being’ after Fifty Years”
10

Edward P. Mahoney, “Lovejoy and the Hierarchy of Being”

Francis Oakley, “Lovejoy’s Unexplored Option”

Johann Huizinga, “History Changing Form”

Joseph Katz, “A Reply to J. Huizinga on the Form and Function of History”

Calvin G. Rand, “Two Meanings of Historicism in the Writings of Dilthey,
Troeltsch, and Meinecke”

Nils B. Kvastad, “Semantics in the Methodology of the History of Ideas”

Paul O. Kristeller, “’Creativity’ and ‘Tradition’”

Lester G. Crocker, “Interpreting the Enlightenment: A Political Approach”

Patrick H. Hutton, “The Art of Memory Reconceived: From Rhetoric to
Psychoanalysis”

Donald R. Kelley, “Horizons of Intellectual History: Retrospect, Circumspect,
Prospect”

Richard Tuck, “History of Political Thought”, in Peter Burke (ed.), New Perspectives on
Historical Writing, Cambridge: Polity Press 1991

Henry F. May, “Religion and American Intellectual History, 1945-1989: Reflections on an
Uneasy Relationship”, chap. 1 in May, The Divided Heart. Essays on Protestantism and the
Enlightenment in America, New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press

Russel Jacoby, “A New Intellectual History?”, American Historical Review, April 1992, pp.
405-424

Dominick LaCapra, “Intellectual History and Its Ways”, American Historical Review, April
1992, pp. 425-439

Mark Bevir, “The Errors of Linguistic Contextualism”, History and Theory, vol. 31, 1992, pp.
276-98

J.G.A. Pocock, ”A discourse of sovereignty: observations on the work in progress”, in Nicholas
Phillipson & Quentin Skinner, Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain (essays in honor of
J.G.A. Pocock), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993

Gerald N. Izenberg, ”Text, Context, and Psychology in Intellectual History”, chap. 3 in Henry
Kozicki (ed.), Developments in Modern Historiography, Houndmills & London: Macmillan

Frans Gregersen & Simo Køppe, “Indledning til idehistorien”, in Gregersen & Køppe,
Idehistorie, vol. 1, Amanda 1994
11

Robert Mayhew, ”Contextualizing Practice in Intellectual History”, Journal of Historical
Geography, vol. 20, no. 3, 1994, pp. 323-328

Lennart Olausson (ed.), Idéhistoriens egenheter. Teori- och metodproblem inom idéhistorien,
Stockholm: Brutus Östlings Bokförlag 1994

Lennart Olausson, ”Från text till text”

Bernt Skovdahl, “Idéhistoria och källkritik”

Staffan Carlshamre, ”Sant eller intressant? Filosofi och idéhistoria”

Jonas Anshelm & Martin Kylhammar, ”Om behovet av samverkan mellan
idéhistoria och litteraturvetenskap”


Bosse Holmqvist, ”Om relativism”

Lennart Olausson, ”Kunnskapssociologi och idéhistoria”

Tomas Jonsson, “Et antinomiskt ideologibegrepp”
Knud Haakonssen, “The History of Ideas”, in Haakonssen, Natural Law and Moral Philosophy
from Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1995

Suzanne Marchand, “Problems and Prospects for Intellectual History”, New German Critique,
vol. 65, 1995, pp. 87-96

Max Edling & Ulf Mörkenstam, “Quentin Skinner: From Historian of Ideas to Political
Scientist”, Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, 1995, pp. 119-132

Melvin Richter, The History of Political and Social Concepts. A Critical Introduction, New
York & Oxford: Oxford University Press 1995

James D. Faubion (ed.), Michel Foucault. Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, vol. 2:
Aesthetics (part 2: Methodology and Epistemology), London: Penguin 1996

John Dunn, “The History of Political Theory”, chap. 2 in Dunn, The History of Political Theory
and other Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996

Uffe Østergård & Jan Ifversen (eds.), Begreb og historie, Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet 1996

Jan Ifversen, ”Hvordan analysere demokrati i tale?”

Uffe Østergaard & Jan Ifversen, ”Europæisk civilisation, begrebshistorie og
diskursanalyse”

Hartmut Lehmann & Melvin Richter, The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts. New
Studies on Begriffsgeschichte, Washington: German Historical Institute 1996

Melvin Richter, “Appreciating a Contemporary Classic: The Geschichtliche
Grundbegriffe and Future Scholarship
12

James van Horn Melton, “Otto Brunner and the Ideological Origins of
Begriffsgeschichte”

Donald R. Kelley, “On the Margins of Begriffsgeschichte”

Gabriel Motzkin, “On Koselleck’s Intuition of Time in History”

J.G.A. Pocock, “Concepts and Discourses: A Difference in Culture? Comment
on a Paper by Melvin Richter”

Reinhart Koselleck, “A Response to Comments on the Geschichtliche
Grundbegriffe”

Reinhart Koselleck, “The Temporalisation of Concepts”, Redescriptions. Finnish Yearbook of
Political Thought, 1997, pp. 16-24

William W. Fisher, “Texts and Contexts: The Application to American Legal History of the
Methodologies of Intellectual History”, Stanford Law Review, vol. 49, no. 5, 1997, pp. 10651110

Robert W. T. Martin, “Context and Contradiction: Toward a Political Theory of Conceptual
Change”, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 2, 1997, pp. 413-436

Jay M. Smith, “No More Language Games: Words, Beliefs, and the Political Culture of Early
Modern France”, American Historical Review, vol. 102, no. 5, 1997, pp. 1413-1440

Kari Palonen, ”Quentin Skinner’s Rhetoric of Conceptual Change”, History of the Human
Sciences, vol. 10, no. 2, 1997, pp. 61-80

Kari Palonen, “An Application of Conceptual History to Itself”, Redescriptions, 1997, pp. 39-69

Michael Freeden, “Editorial: Ideologies and conceptual history”, Journal of Political Ideologies,
vol. 2, no. 1, 1997, pp. 3-11

Gad Prudovsky, “Can We Ascribe to Past Thinkers Copncepts They Had no Linguistic Means
to Express?”, History and Theory, vol. 36, no. 1, 1997, pp. 15-31

Mark Bevir, “Mind and Method in the History of Ideas”, History and Theory, vol. 36, no. 2,
1997, pp. 167-189

Roger Chartier, On the Edge of the Cliff. History, Language and Practices, Baltimore &
London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1997

D.R. Woolf, “The Writing of Early Modern European Intellectual History, 1945-1995”, in
Michael Bentley (ed.), Companion to Historiography, London & New York: Routledge 1997

J. Gunnell, “Time and Interpretation: Understanding Concepts and Conceptual Change”,
History of Political Thought, vol. 19, 1998, pp. 641-658
13

Iain Hampsher-Monk, Karin Tilmans & Frank van Vree (eds.), History of Concepts –
Comparative Perspectives, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press 1998

Iain Hampsher-Monk, Karin Tilmans & Frank van Vree , ”A Comparative
Perspective on Conceptual History – An Introduction”

Pim den Boer, “The Historiography of German Geistesgeschichte and the Dutch
Project of Conceptual History”

Reinhart Koselleck, “Social History and Begriffsgeschichte”

Iain Hampsher-Monk, “Speech Acts, Languages or Conceptual History?”

Hans Erich Bödeker, “Concept – Meaning – Discourse. Begriffsgeschichte
Reconsidered”

Maurizio Viroli, “The Origin and the Meaning of the Reason of State”

Terence Ball, “Conceptual History and the History of Political Thought”

Bernhard F. Scholz, “Conceptual History in Context: Reconstructing the
Terminology of an Academic Discipline”

Willem Frijhoff, “Conceptual History, Social History and Cultural History: The
test of ‘Cosmopolitism’”

Hans-Jürgen Lüsebrink, “Conceptual History and Conceptual Transfer: The Case
of ‘Nation’ in Revolutionary France and Germany”

Bram Kempers, “Words, Images and All the Pope’s Men. Raphael’s Stanza della
Segnatura and the Synthesis of Divine Wisdom”

Eddy de Jongh, “Painted Words in Dutch Art of the Seventeenth Century”

Rolf Reichardt, “Historical Semantics and Political Iconography: The case of the
Game of the French Revolution (1791/92)”

Martin van Gelderen, “Between Cambridge and Heidelberg: Concepts,
Languages and Images in Intellectual History”

Martin Jay, “European Intellectual History and the Specter of Multiculturalism”, in Jay,
Cultural Semantics. Keywords of Our Time, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press 1998

Terence Ball, “Political Argument and Conceptual Change”, in Ball, Transforming Political
Discourse. Political Theory and Critical Conceptual History, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1998

Jerry Z. Muller, “Begriffsgeschichte: Origins and Prospects”, History of European Ideas, vol.
25, 1999, pp. 3-7
14

Hayden White, “Literary Theory and Historical Writing”, in White, Figural Realism. Studies in
the Mimesis Effect, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1999

Hayden White, “Historical Emplotment and the Problem of Truth in Historical Representation”,
in White, Figural Realism. Studies in the Mimesis Effect, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins
University Press 1999

Hayden White, “Formalist and Contextualist Strategies in Historical Explanation”, in White,
Figural Realism. Studies in the Mimesis Effect, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University
Press 1999

Mark Bevir, The Logic of the History of Ideas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999

James Schmidt, “How Historical is Begriffsgeschichte?”, History of European Ideas, vol. 25,
1999, pp. 9-14

Janet Coleman, “The Practical Use of Begriffsgeschichte”, Redescriptions, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 2840

Kari Palonen, “Rhetorical and Temporal Perspectives on Conceptual Change. Theses on
Quentin Skinner and Reinhart Koselleck”, Redescriptions, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 41-59

Quentin Skinner, “Rhetoric and Conceptual Change”, Redescriptions, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 60-73

David Armitage, “Answering the Call: The History of Political and Social Concepts in English”,
History of European Ideas, vol. 25, 1999, pp. 15-22

Daniel Gordon, “Modernity and its Discontents: Some Critical Thoughts on Conceptual
History”, History of European Ideas, vol. 25, 1999, pp. 23-29

Melvin Richter, “Reply to Comments”, History of European Ideas, vol. 25, 1999, pp. 31-37

P.J. Kelly, “Contextual and Non-Contextual Histories of Political Thought”, in Jack Hayward,
Brian Barry & Archie Brown (eds.), The British Study of Politics in the Twentieth Century,
Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999

Nils Andersson & Henrik Björck (eds.), Vad är idéhistoria? Perspektiv på ämnets identitet
under sextio år, Stockholm: Brutus Östlings Bokförlag 1999

Siep Stuurman, ”The Canon of the History of Political Thought: Its Critique and a Proposed
Alternative”, History and Theory, vol. 39, 2000, pp. 147-166

Mark Bevir, “The Logic of the History of Ideas”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp.
295-300

Kari Palonen, “Logic or Rhetoric in the History of Political Thought? Comments on Mark
Bevir”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 301-310
15

Siep Stuurman, “On Intellectual Innovation and the Methodology of the History of Ideas”,
Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 311-319

F.R. Ankersmit, “Comments on Bevir’s The Logic of the History of Ideas”, Rethinking History,
vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 321-331

Allan Megill, “Imagining the History of Ideas”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 333340

Mark Bevir, “Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Power: A Response to Critics”, Rethinking History, vol.
4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 341-350

Mark Bevir and Frank Ankersmit, “Exchanging Ideas”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000,
pp. 351-372

Mark Bevir, “Begriffsgeschichte”, History and Theory, vol. 39, no. 2, 2000, pp. 273-284

Erland Mårald, “Idéhistoria ur ett världshistoriskt perspektiv”, i Mohammad Fazlhashemi,
Anders Öckerman & Ronny Ambjörnsson (eds.), Vidgade vyer. Globalt perspektiv på
idéhistoria, Lund: Studentlitteratur 2000

Mark Bevir, “The Text as a Historical Object”, Redescriptions. Finnish Yearbook of Political
Thought, 2000, pp. 201-222

Timothy Bahti, “Literary Criticism and the History of Ideas”, in Christa Knellwolf &
Christopher Norris (eds.), Literary Criticism, vol. 9, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
2001

Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 33, 2001: Quentin Skinner og intellektuel historie

Tore Eriksen & Peter C. Kjærgaard, ”Quentin Skinner – fra idéhistorie til
intellektuel historie”

Quentin Skinner, ”Moralske principper og social forandring”

Anthony Pagden, ”Intellektuel historie”

Tore Frängsmyr, ”Idéhistorie eller idéernes funktion i historien”

Thomas Krogh, ”Quentin Skinner og problemer i at skrive den politiske
tænknings historie”

Hans-Jørgen Schanz, ”Intellektuel historie som genre og disciplin”

Victoria Höög, ”Historiens tvetydighed: Quentin Skinner og problematiseringen
af traditionen”

Duncan Forbes, “Aesthetic thoughts on doing the history of ideas”, History of European Ideas,
vol. 27, 2001, pp. 101-113
16

Peter J. Boettke, “F.A. Hayek as an intellectual historian of economics”, chap. 7 in Steven G.
Medema & Warren J. Samuels (eds.), Historians of Economics and Economic Thought, London
& New York: Routledge 2001

Geoffrey Gilbert, “Donald Winch as intellectual historian”, chap. 18 in Steven G. Medema &
Warren J. Samuels (eds.), Historians of Economics and Economic Thought, London & New
York: Routledge 2001

Duncan Bell, “The Cambridge School and world politics: critical theory, history and conceptual
change”, 2001, www.theglobalsite.ac.uk

Eckhart Hellmuth & Christoph von Ehrenstein, “Intellectual History Made in Britain: Die
Cambridge School und ihre Kritiker”, Geschichte und Gesellschaft, vol. 27, 2001, pp. 149-172

Daniel Wickberg, “Intellectual History vs. the Social History of Intellectuals”, Rethinking
History, vol. 5, no. 3, 2001, pp. 383-395

Dominick LaCapra, Writing History, Writing Trauma, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins
University Press 2001

David Runciman, “History of Political Thought: The State of the Discipline”, British Journal of
Politics and International Relations, vol. 3, no. 1, 2001, pp. 84-104

Iain Hampsher-Monk, “The History of Political Thought and the Political History of Thought”,
in Dario Castiglione & Iain Hampsher-Monk, The History of Political Thought in National
Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001

Melvin Richter, “A German Version of the ‘Linguistic Turn’: Reinhart Koselleck and the
History of Political and Social Concepts (Begriffsgeschichte)”, in Dario Castiglione & Iain
Hampsher-Monk, The History of Political Thought in National Context, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press 2001

Quentin Skinner, “The Rise of, Challenge to and Prospects for a Collingwoodian Approach to
the History of Political Thought”, in Dario Castiglione & Iain Hampsher-Monk, The History of
Political Thought in National Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001

Donald R. Kelley, “Eclecticism and the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol.
62, no. 4, 2001, pp. 577-592

F. Oz-Salzberger, “Intellectual History”, in Neil J. Smelser (ed.), International Encyclopedia of
the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Amsterdam & New York: Elsevier 2001, pp. 7605-7612

Trond Berg Eriksen & Øystein Sørensen, ”Redaktørenes forord”, in Eriksen & Sørensen (eds.),
Norsk Idéhistorie, vol. 1, Oslo: Aschehoug 2001
17

Trond Berg Eriksen & Øystein Sørensen, ”Tusen års tankeliv”, in Eriksen & Sørensen (eds.),
Norsk Idéhistorie, vol. 6, Oslo: Aschehoug 2001

Jason David BeDuhn, “The historical assessment of speech acts: clarification of Austin and
Skinner for the study of religions”, Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, vol. 14, 2002,
pp. 84-113

Donald R. Kelley, The Descent of Ideas. The History of Intellectual History, Aldershot: Ashgate
2002

History of European Ideas, vol. 28, no 1-2, 2002: Mark Bevir and the Logic of the History of
Ideas: A Symposium
o Robert Stern, “History, meaning and interpretation: a critical response to Bevir”, pp. 112
o Hugh Rayment-Pickard, “Derrida and fidelity to history”, pp. 13-20
o James Martin, “The political logic of discourse: a neo-Gramscian view”, pp. 21-31
o Melissa Lane, “Why the History of Ideas at all?”, pp. 33-41
o Alun Munslow, “Objectivity and the writing of history”, pp. 43-50
o R.M. Burns, “Language, tradition, and self in the generation of meaning”, pp. 51-75
o Jane Garnett, “Whose logic? Reflections on gender in the history of ideas”, pp. 77-82
o Mark Bevir, “Clarifications”, pp. 83-100
o Brian Yong, “The tyranny of the definite article: Some thoughts on the art of intellectual
history”, 101-117

Reinhart Koselleck, The Practice of Conceptual History. Timing History, Spacing Concepts,
Stanford: Stanford University Press 2002

Peter Burke, “Context in Context”, Common Knowledge, vol. 8, no. 1, 2002, pp. 152-177

Kari Palonen, “The History of Concepts as a Style of Political Theorizing. Quentin Skinner's
and Reinhart Koselleck's Subversion of Normative Political Theory”, European Journal of
Political Theory, vol. 1, no. 1, 2002, pp. 91-106

Sandro Chignola, “History of political thought and the history of political concepts: Koselleck's
proposal and Italian research”, History of Political Thought, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 517-541

Petri Koikkalainen & Sami Syrjämäki, “Interview: Quentin Skinner on Encountering the Past”,
Redescriptions. Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought, no. 6, 2002, pp. 34-63

Donald R. Kelley, “Intellectual History and Cultural History: The Inside and the Outside”,
History of the Human Sciences, vol. 15, no. 2, 2002, pp. 1-19
18

Quentin Skinner, Visions of Politics, vol. 1: Regarding Method, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press 2002

Hans Erich Bödeker (ed.), Begriffgeschichte, Diskursgeschichte, Metapherngeschichte,
Göttingen: Wallstein 2002

Hans Erich Bödeker, “Ausprägungen der historischen Semantik in den
historiscen Kulturwissenschaften”

Reinhart
Koselleck,
“Hinweise
auf
die
temporalen
Strukturen
begriffsgeschichtlichen Wandels”

Ulrich Ricken, “Zum Verhältnis vergleichender Begriffsgeschichte und
vergleichender Lexikologie”

Hans Erich Bödeker, ”Reflexionen über Begriffsgeschichte als Methode”

Jacques Guilhaumou, “L’historie linguistique des usages conceptuels à l’épreuve
des événements linguistiques”

Mark Bevir, “The Role of Contexts in Understanding and Explanation”

Rüdiger Zill, “Substrukturen des Denkens. Grenzen und Perspektiven einer
Metapherngeschichte nach Hans Blumenberg”


Lutz Danneberg: ”Sinn und Unsinn einer Metapherngeschichte”
Richard Macksey, “The History of Ideas at 80”, Modern Language Notes, vol. 117, no. 5, 2002,
pp. 1083-1097

Annabel Brett, “What is Intellectual History Now?”, in David Cannadine (ed.), What is History
Now?, Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan 2002

Duncan S.A. Bell, “Language, Legitimacy, and the Project of Critique”, Alternatives, vol. 27,
2002, pp. 327-350

Jan Ifversen, “Text, Discourse, Concept: Approaches to Textual Analysis”, Kontur, no. 7, 2003,
pp. 60-69

Jussi Kurunmäki & Kari Palonen (eds.), Zeit, Geschichte und Politik. Time, History and
Politics. Zum achtzigsten Geburtstag von Reinhart Koselleck, Jyväskylä: University of
Jyväskylä Press 2003
o Wolf-Dieter Narr und Kari Palonen, ”Zeit, Zeitlichkeit und Geschichte – sperrige
Reflexionen. Reinhart Koselleck im Gespräch”
o Patricia Springborg, ”What can we say about history? Modernity and historical
consciousness”
19
o Björn Wittrock, “Cultural crystallisation and conceptual change. Modernity, axiality and
meaning in history”

Melvin Richter, ”Toward a Lexicon of European Political and Legal Concepts: A Comparison
of Begriffsgeschichte and the ‘Cambridge School’”, Critical Review of International Social and
Political Philosophy, vol. 6, no. 2, 2003, pp. 91-120

Herfried Münkler, “Politische Ideengeschichte”, in Münkler (ed.), Politikwissenschaft. Ein
Grundkurs, Hamburg: Rohwolt 2003

Kari Palonen, Quentin Skinner – History, Politics, Rhetoric, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press 2003

David Boucher & Paul Kelly, “Introduction”, in Boucher & Kelly (eds.), Political Thinkers
from Socrates to the Present, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003

Jan Ifversen, “Om den tyske begrebshistorie”, Politologiske Studier, no. 1, 2003, pp. 18-34

Per Mouritsen, ”Hvorfor idéhistorie – og hvordan?”, Politologiske Studier, no. 1, 2003, pp. 8-17

Trond Berg Eriksen, Hva er Idéhistorie, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget 2003

Sven Arntzen & Otto M. Christensen (eds.), Hvor kommer idéhistorien fra? Tematiske og
teoretiske brytninger i idéhistoriefaget, Kristiansand: HøyskoleForlaget 2003

Sven Arntzen & Otto M. Christensen:,“Hvor kommer idéhistorien fra”

Dorthe Jørgensen, ”Hvad er idéhistorie?”

Trond Berg Eriksen, ”Hvad kan idéhistorikere si om Norge?”

Nils Gilje, ”Idéhistorie og folkekultur i den tidlig moderne perioden”

Knut Ove Eliassen, ”En lav opplysning?”

Sverre Bagge, ”Fra jordlapp og pengestykke til mentalitet og diskurs. Historiens
forhold til idéhistorien”

Victoria Höög, ”Idéhistoria och den klassiska bildungstraditionen. Refleksioner
över humanioras framtid i det senmoderna samhället”


Sven Arntzen, ”Arthur O. Lovejoy og idéhistorien”

Arthur O. Lovejoy, ”Studiet av idéhistorien”
Alan Finlayson, “Political Science, Political Ideas and Rhetoric”, Economy and Society, vol. 33,
no. 4, 2004, pp. 528-549

“Editorial”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 1, no. 1, 2004, pp. 1-2

Kjetil Jakobsen, “Intellektuel historie og de intellektuelles historie”, ARR, no. 4, 2004, pp. 15-25

Thomas Krogh, ”Idéhistorien og andre historier”, ARR, no. 4, 2004, pp. 27-33
20

H.O. Christophersen, ”Noen bemerkninger om idéhistoriens innhold og metode”, ARR, no. 4,
2004, pp. 39-45

Ingrid Markussen, ”På sporet af ideer”, ARR, no. 4, 2004, pp. 83-91

Lloyd Kramer, “Intellectual History and Philosophy”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 1, no. 1,
2004, pp. 81-95

Carolyn Dean, “Intellectual History and the Prominence of Things that Matter”, Rethinking
History, vol. 8, no. 4, 2004, pp. 537-547

Elizabeth A. Clark, “The New Intellectual History” + “Texts and Contexts, chaps. 6-7 in Clark,
History, Theory, Text. Historians and the Linguistic Turn, Cambridge, Mass. & London:
Harvard University Press 2004

Reinhart Koselleck, Futures Past, New York: Columbia University Press 2004

Sverker Sörlin, “Världens ordning”, in Sörlin, Världens ordning. Europas idéhistoria 14921918, Stockholm: Natur och Kultur 2004

Donald R. Kelley, “Intellectual History in a Global Age”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 2005,
pp. 155-167

Allan Megill, ”Globalization and the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 2005,
pp. 179-187

Joseph M. Levine, “Intellectual History as History”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 2005, pp.
189-200

Allan Megill, “Intellectual History and History”, Rethinking History, vol. 8, no. 4, 2004, pp.
549-557

Rafael Major, ”The Cambridge School and Leo Strauss: Texts and Context of American
Political Science”, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 58, no. 3, 2005, pp. 477-485

Niklas Olsen, “Historien om de historiske grundbegreber”, www.historie-nu.dk, August 2005

Jeppe Nevers, Kildekritikkens begrebshistorie. En undersøgelse af historiefagets metodelære,
Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag 2005

Renée Jeffery, “Tradition as Invention: the ‘traditions tradition’ and the history of ideas in
international relations”, Millennium, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 57-84

Kari Palonen, ”The Politics of Conceptual History”, Contributions, vol. 1, no. 1, 2005, pp. 3750
21

Andreas Schinkel, “Imagination as a Category of History: An Essay concerning Koselleck’s
Concepts of Erfahrungsraum and Erwartungshorizont”, History and Theory, vol. 44, 2005, pp.
42-54

Richard Macksey, “History of Ideas”, in Michael Groden, Martin Kreiswirth & Imre Szeman
(eds.), The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism, 2. ed., Baltimore & London:
Johns Hopkins University Press 2005

Melvin Richter, “More than a Two-Way Traffic: Analyzing, Translating, and Comparing
Political Concepts from Other Cultures”, Contributions, vol. 1, no. 1, 2005, pp. 7-20

Robert Darnton, “Discourse and Diffusion”, Contributions, vol. 1, no. 1, 2005, pp. 21-28

Quentin Skinner, “On Intellectual History and the History of Books”, Contributions, vol. 1, no.
1, 2005, pp. 29-36

Martin J. Burke, “Conceptual History in the United States: A Missing “National Project””,
Contributions, vol. 1, no. 2, 2005, pp. 127-144

Sandro Chignola, “Redescribing Political Concepts: History of Concepts and Politics”,
Contributions, vol. 1, no. 2, 2005, pp. 245-251

Maryanne Cline Horowitz, “Preface”, in Horowitz (ed.), New Dictionary of the History of Ideas,
New York: Charles Schribner’s Sons 2005

Donald R. Kelley, “Ideas, History of”, in Horowitz (ed.), New Dictionary of the History of
Ideas, vol. 3, New York: Charles Schribner’s Sons 2005

Reinhart Koselleck, Begriffsgeschichten. Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen
und sozialen Sprache, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 2006

Pasi Ihalainen, ”Between historical semantics and pragmatics: Reconstructing past political
thought through conceptual history”, Journal of Historical Pragmatics, vol. 7, no. 1, 2006, pp.
115-143

J.G.A. Pocock, “Theory in History: Problems of Context and Narrative”, in John S. Dryzek,
Bonnie Honig & Anne Phillips (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, Oxford: Oxford
University Press 2006

James Farr, “The History of Political Thought as Disciplinary Genre”, in John S. Dryzek,
Bonnie Honig & Anne Phillips (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, Oxford: Oxford
University Press 2006

Annabel Brett & James Tully (eds.), Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006
22

Mark Goldie, “The Context of The Foundations”

Holly Hamilton-Bleakley, “Linguistic Philosophy and The Foundations”

J.G.A. Pocock, “Foundations and Moments”

Marco Geuna, “Skinner, Pre-Humanist Rhetorical Culture and Machiavelli”

Warren Boutcher, “Unoriginal Authors: How to Do Things with Texts in the
Renaissance”

Cathy Curtis, “’The Best State of the Commonwealth’: Thomas More and
Quentin Skinner”

H.M. Höpfl, “Scholasticism in Quentin Skinner’s Foundations”

Annabel Brett, “Scholastic Political Thought and the Modern Concept of the
State”

Martin van Gelderen, “’So merely humane’: Theories of Resistance in EarlyModern Europe”

Richard Tuck, “Hobbes and Democracy”

Kinch Hoekstra, “A Lion in the House: Hobbes and Democracy”

David Armitage, “Hobbes and the Foundations of Modern International
Thought”


Quentin Skinner, “Surveying The Foundations: A Retrospect and Reassessment”
Jonathan Israel, ”Historians and the Writing of ‘Intellectual History’”, in Israel, Enlightenment
Contested. Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man 1670-1752, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press 2006

Richard Whatmore & Brian Yong (eds.), Palgrave Advances in Intellectual History,
Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan 2006

John W. Burrow, “Intellectual History in English Academic Life”

Brian Young, “Intellectual History in Britain”

Abigail Williams, “Literary and Intellectual History”

Lucy Hartley, “Intellectual History and the History of Art”

Mishtooni Bose, “The Intellectual History of the Middle Ages”

Richard Whatmore, “Intellectual History and the History of Political Thought”

James Livesey, “Intellectual History and the History of Science”

Deborah Madden, “Medicine, Science and Intellectual History”

Brian Cowan, “Intellectual, Social and Cultural History: Ideas in Context”
23

Rachel Foxley, “Gender and Intellectual History”

Duncan Kelly, “The Politics of Intellectual History in Twentieth-Century
Europe”

Terence Ball, “Must Political Theory Be Historical?”, Contributions, vol. 2, no. 1, 2006, pp. 718

Bo Stråth, “Ideology and History”, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 11, no. 1, 2006, pp. 2342

Rudolf Valkhoff, ”Some Similarities between Begriffsgeschichte and the History of Discourse”,
Contributions, vol. 2, no. 1, 2006, pp. 83-98

Javier Fernández Sebastián & Juan Francisco Fuentes, “Conceptual History, Memory and
Identity: An Interview with Reinhart Koselleck”, Contributions, vol. 2, no. 1, 2006, pp. 99-127

Robert Burns (red.), Historiography. Critical Concepts in Historical Studies, vol. 3: Ideas,
London & New York: Routledge 2006

Stefano Collini et. al., “What is Intellectual History?”

Maurice Mandelbaum, “The History of Ideas, Intellectual History, and the
History of Philosophy”

Ben Rogers, “Review Article: Philosophy for Historians: The Methodological
Writings of Quentin Skinner”

Melvin Richter, “Begriffsgeschichte and the History of Ideas”

David Harlan, “Intellectual History and the Return of Literature”

Joyce Appleby, “One Good Turn Deserves Another: Moving Beyond the
Linguistic: A Response to David Harlan”

Fritz Ringer, “The Intellectual Field, Intellectual History, and the Sociology of
Knowledge”

Robert M. Burns, “Language, Tradition, and the Self in the Generation of
Meaning”

Donald R. Kelley, Frontiers of History. Historical Inquiry in the Twentieth Century, New
Haven & London: Yale University Press 2006

Emma Rotschild, “Arc of Ideas. International History and Intellectual History”, in Gunilla
Budde, Sebastian Conrad & Oliver Janz (eds.), Transnationale Geschichte. Themen, Tendenzen
und Theorien, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2006
24

J.G.A. Pocock, Gordon Schochet & Lois G. Schwoerer, “The History of British Political
Thought: A Field and its Futures”, in David Armitage (ed.), British Political Thought in
History, Literature and Theory, 1500-1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006

Richard E. Flathman, “Here and Now, There and Then, Always and Everywhere: Reflections
Concerning Political Theory and the Study/Writing of Political Thought”, in David Armitage
(ed.), British Political Thought in History, Literature and Theory, 1500-1800, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press 2006

Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 47, 2006: Hans Blumenberg

Hans Blumenberg: ”En antropologisk tilnærmelse til retorikkens aktualitet”

Odo Marquard, ”Aflastning fra det absolutte – In memorian”

Manfred Sommer, ”Beskrivelse af mennesket – Interview med Manfred
Sommer”

Kasper Lysemose, ”Balancen mellem Husserl og Heidegger – den tidlige
Blumenbergs iagttagelser af fænomenologien”

Ulrik Houlind Rasmussen, ”Metaforiseret kosmologi – eller hvordan Kopernikus
stillede et metaforisk potentiale til rådighed for det moderne menneskes
selvforståelse”

Frank Beck Lassen, ”Hvad var det vi ville vide? – Hans Blumenbergs
metaforologi som læsestrategi”

Anthony Grafton, “The History of Ideas: Precepts and Practice, 1950-200 and Beyond”, Journal
of the History of Ideas, 2006, pp. 1-32

John Patrick Diggins, “Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Challenge of Intellectual History”, Journal of
the History of Ideas, 2006, pp. 181-208

Robert Darnton, “’What is the History of Books’ Revisited”, Modern Intellectual History, vol.
4, no. 3, 2007, pp. 495-508

Jason Edwards, “The Ideological Interpellation of Individuals as Combatants: An Encounter
Between Reinhart Koselleck and Michel Foucault”, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 12, no.
1, 2007, pp. 49-66

Peter Thiergen, “Probleme russischer Begriffsgeschichte”, Studia Slavica, vol. 52, no. 1-2,
2007, pp. 403-412

Emmanuelle Tricoire & Jacques Lévy, “Interview with Quentin Skinner: Concepts only have
histories”, 2007, www.espacestemps.net/document3692.html
25

Allan Megill, Historical Knowledge, Historical Error: A Contemporary Guide to Practice,
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007

Roger Chartier, “The Order of Books Revisited”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 4, no. 3,
2007, pp. 509-519

David D. Hall, “What was the History of Book? A Response”, Modern Intellectual History, vol.
4, no. 3, 2007, pp. 537-544

Jotham Parsons, “Defining the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 68, no. 4,
2007, pp. 683-699

Branko Mitrovic, “Intellectual History, Inconceivability, and Methodological Holism”, History
and Theory, vol. 46, 2007, pp. 29-47

Terence Ball, “Professor Skinner’s Visions”, Political Studies Review, vol. 5, 2007, pp. 351-364

Victoria Fareld, “Contexts in Flux: Textual Concerns for the Historian of Ideas”, Ideas in
History, vol. 2, no. 3, 2007

Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 48, 2007: Begrebshistorie

Reinhart Koselleck, ”Dannelsens antropologiske og semantiske struktur”

Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht, Ӂndens pyramider Рom den begrebshistoriske
bevægelses hastige fremkomst, dens usynlige dimensioner og pludselige aftagen”

Jan Ifversen, ”Begrebshistorien efter Reinhart Koselleck”

Niklas Olsen, ”En partisan i kamp for historier i flertal – Reinhart Kosellecks
alternativ til historiefilosofien”

Jeppe Nevers, ”Spørgsmålets politik – Kari Palonen og den nyere
begrebshistorie”


Frank Beck Lassen, ”Tyveri! – til sekulariseringens semantik”
Stine Grumsen & Hans Henrik Hjermitslev, ”Institut for Idéhistorie 1967-2004. Et studie af
institutionens oprettelse, udvikling og afvikling”, Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 50,
2007, pp. 96-124

Jens Busck, Jeppe Nevers & Niklas Olsen (eds.), Reinhart Koselleck: Begreber, tid og erfaring,
København: Hans Reitzel 2007

Javier Fernández Sebastián, ”Intellectual History, Liberty and Republicanism: An Interview
with Quentin Skinner”, Contributions to the History of Concepts, vol. 3, 2007, pp. 103-123

Emile Perreau-Saussine, “Quentin Skinner in Context”, Review of Politics, vol. 69, 2007, pp.
106-122
26

John E. Toews, “Integrating Music Into Intellectual History: Nineteenth-Century Art Music as a
Discourse of Agency and Identity”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 5, no. 2, 2008, pp. 309331

Stefan
Collini:
“Intellectual
History”,
2008,
www.history.ac.uk/makinghistory/resources/articles/intellectual_history.html

Andrew Sartori, Bengal in Global Concept History, Chicago & London: University of Chicago
Press, chap. 1

Mark Bevir, “What is Genealogy?”, vol. 2, 2008, pp. 263-275

Ryan Walter, “Reconciling Foucault and Skinner on the State: The Primacy of Politics?”,
History of the Human Sciences, vol. 21, no. 3, 2008, pp. 94-114

John Pocock, “Historiography and Political Thought”, Ideas in History, vol. 3, no. 3, 2008, pp.
81-100

Kari Palonen, “John Pocock and Quentin Skinner. The Machiavellian and the Weberian
Moment”, Ideas in History, vol. 3, no. 3, 2008, pp. 61-79

Thomas Krogh, “Time in History and in Politics – a Prominent Theme in the Works of John
Pocock”, Ideas in History, vol. 3, no. 3, 2008, pp. 33-59

Danny Millum:
“Making
History
Interview
with
Quentin
Skinner”,
April
2008,
http://www.history.ac.uk/makinghistory/resources/interviews/Skinner_Quentin.html

Laszlo Kontler, “Translation and Comparison II: A Methodological Inquiry into Reception in
the History of Ideas”, Contributions, vol. 4, no. 1, 2008, pp. 27-56

João Feres, “Taking Text Seriously: Remarks on the Methodology of the History of Political
Thought”, Contributions, vol. 4, no. 1, 2008, pp. 57-80

Luca Scuccimarra, “Semantics of Time and Historical Experience: Remarks on Koselleck’s
Historik”, Contributions, vol. 4, no. 2, 2008, pp. 160-175

Vicente Oieni & João Feres, “Conceptual History and Translation: An Interview with Melvin
Richter”, Contributions, vol. 4, no. 2, 2008, pp. 226-238

Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen, “Making Sense of Conceptual Change”, History and Theory, vol. 47,
2008, pp. 351-372

Niklas Luhmann, “Ideengeschichte in soziologischer Perspektive”, in Luhmann, Ideenevolution,
Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 2008 [1981]
27

Pasi Ihalainen & Kari Palonen, “Parliamentary Sources in the Comparative Study of Conceptual
History: Methodological Aspects and Illustrations of a Research Proposal”, Parliaments,
Estates & Representation, vol. 29, 2009, pp. 17-34

Dominick LaCapra, “Articulating Intellectual History, Cultural History, and Critical Theory”, in
LaCapra, History and its Limits. Human, Animal, Violence, Ithaca & London: Cornell
University Press 2009

Dominick LaCapra, “Tropisms of Intellectual History”, in LaCapra, History and its Limits.
Human, Animal, Violence, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press 2009

Colin Tyler, “Performativity and the Intellectual Historian’s Re-Enactment of Written Words”,
Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 167-186

Jan-Werner Müller, “The triumph of what (if anything)? Rethinking political ideologies and
political institutions in twentieth-century Europe”, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 14, no.
2, 2009, pp. 211-226

Donald Winch, “Intellectual History and the History of Economic Thought: A Personal View”,
History of Economics Review, 2009, pp. 1-16

Chris Goto-Jones, “The Kyoto School, the Cambridge School, and the History of Political
Philosophy in Wartime Japan”, Positions, vol. 17, no. 1, 2009, pp. 13-42

Toby Reiner, “Texts as Performances: How to Reconstruct Webs of Beliefs from Expressed
Utterances”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 266-289

J.G.A. Pocock, Political Thought and History. Essays on Theory and Method, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press 2009

A.P. Martinich, “Four Senses of ‘Meaning’ in the History of Ideas: Quentin Skinner’s Theory of
Historical Interpretation”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 225-245

Robert Lamb, “Recent Developments in the Thought of Quentin Skinner and the Ambitions of
Contextualism”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 246-265

Mark Bevir, “Contextualism: From Modernist Method to Post-Analytic Historicism”, Journal of
the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 211-224

Alexander Gallus, “’Intellectual History’ mit Intellektuellen und ohne sie. Facetten neuerer
geistesgeschichtliche Forschung”, Historische Zeitschrift, vol. 288, no. 1, 2009, pp. 139-150

Richard Fisher, “How to Do Things with Books: Quentin Skinner and the Dissemination of
Ideas”, History of European Ideas, vol. 35, 2009, pp. 276-280
28

Mikkel Thorup & Frank Beck Lassen (eds.), Quentin Skinner: Politik og Historie, København:
Hans Reitzel 2009

Markku Hyrkkänen, “All History Is, More or Less, Intellectual History: R.G. Collingwood’s
Contribution to the Theory and Methodology of Intellectual History”, Intellectual History
Review, vol. 19, no. 2, 2009, pp. 251-263

Sonja Asal, Frank Druffner & Valentin Groebner, ”Wie frei sind wir wirklich? Fragen an
Quentin Skinner”, Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte, no. 2, 2009, pp. 5-21

William Walker, “J.G.A. Pocock and the History of British Political Thought: Assessing the
State of the Art”, Eighteenth-Century Life, vol. 33, no. 1, 2009, pp. 83-96

Robert Lamb, “Quentin Skinner’s Revised Historical Contextualism: A Critique”, History of the
Human Sciences, vol. 22, no. 3, 2009, pp. 51-73

Hubert Locher, “Denken in Bildern. Reinhart Kosellecks Program Zur politischen Ikonologie”,
Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte, no. 4, 2009, pp. 81-96

Elías José Palti, “From Ideas to Concepts to Metaphors: The German Tradition of Intellectual
History and the Complex Fabric of Language”, History and Theory, vol. 49, 2010, pp. 194-211

Stefan-Ludwig Hoffmann, “Koselleck, Arendt, and the Anthropology of Historical Experience”,
History and Theory, vol. 49, 2010, pp. 212-236

Sudipta Kaviraj, ”Said and the History of Ideas”, in Sugata Bose & Kris Manjapra (eds.),
Cosmopolitan Thought Zones, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan 2010

Mikkel Thorup & Frank Beck Lassen, “Tekstfortolkeren. Interview med Quentin Skinner”,
Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 57, 2010, pp. 171-189

David A. Hollinger, “American Intellectual History, 1907-2007”, in James M. Banner (ed.), A
Century of American Historiography, Boston & New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s 2010

J.G.A. Pocock, “Historiography as a Form of Political Thought”, History of European Ideas,
vol. 37, 2010, pp. 1-6

Riccardo Bavaj, “Intellectual History”, 2010, http://docupedia.de/zg/Intellectual_History

Pierre Force, “The Teeth of Time: Pierre Hadot on Meaning and Misunderstanding in the
History of Ideas”, History and Theory, vol. 50, 2011, pp. 20-40

Roger Chartier, “History, Time, and Space”, Republics of Letters, vol. 2, no. 2, 2011, pp.1-13

Jan-Werner Müller, “European Intellectual History as Contemporary History”, Journal of
Contemporary History, vol. 46, no. 3, 2011, pp. 574-590
29

Martin Saar, “Relocating the Modern State: Governmentality and the History of Ideas”, in
Ulrich Bröckling, Susanne Krasmann & Thomas Lemke (eds.), Governmentality. Current Issues
and Future Challenges, London & New York: Routledge 2011

Naja Vucina, Claus Drejer & Peter Triantafillou, “Histories and freedom of the present:
Foucault and Skinner”, History of the Human Sciences, vol. 25, no. 5, 2011, pp. 124-141

Martin Jay, “Historical Explanation and the Event: Reflections on the Limits of
Contextualization”, New Literary History, vol. 42, 2011, pp. 557-571

Allan Megill, “Five Questions on Intellectual History”, Rethinking History, vol. 15, no. 14,
2011, pp. 489-510

Reinhart Koselleck, “Introduction and Prefaces to the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe”,
Contributions, vol. 6, no. 1, 2011, pp. 1-37

Nikolay Koposov, “Collective Singulars. A Reinterpretation”, Contributions, vol. 6, no. 1,
2011, pp- 39-64

Jan Ifversen, “About Key Concepts and How to Study Them”, Contributions, vol. 6, no. 1,
2011, pp. 65-88

“The European Conceptual History Project (ECHP): Mission Statement”, Contributions, vol. 6,
no. 1, 2011, pp. 111-116

Peter Ghosh, “Hugh Trevor-Roper and the history of ideas”, History of European Ideas, vol. 37,
2011, pp. 483-505

Teresa Bejan, “Interview: Quentin Skinner on Meaning and Method”, The Art of Theory, 2011,
http://www.artoftheory.com/quentin-skinner-on-meaning-and-method/

Teresa Bejan, “Interview: Quentin Skinner in Context”, The Art of Theory, 2011,
http://www.artoftheory.com/quentin-skinner-in-context/

Symposium on Quentin Skinner, from Method to Politics, , Journal of the History of Ideas, vol.
73, no. 1, 2012
o Melissa Lane, “Doing Our Own Thinking for Ourselves: On Quentin Skinner’s
Genealogical Turn”
o Bryan Garsten, “Liberalism and the Rhetorical Vision of Politics”
o Nadia Urbinati, “Republicanism after the French Revolution: The Case of Sismonde
Sismondi”
o Philip Petitt, “Freedom in Hobbes’s Ontology and Semantics: A Comment on Quentin
Skinner”
30
o Quentin Skinner, “On the Liberty of the Ancients and the Moderns: A Reply to My
Critics”

Forum on the Present and Future of American Intellectual History, Modern Intellectual History,
vol. 9, no. 1, 2012, pp. 149-248
o Thomas Bender: “Forum: the Present and Future of American Intellectual History,
Introduction”
o Leslie Butler: “From the History of Ideas to Ideas in History”
o David A. Hall: “Backwards to the Future: the Cultural Turn and the Wisdom of
Intellectual History”
o David A. Hollinger: “What is Our ‘Canon’? How American Intellectual Historians
Debate the Core of their Field”
o James
T.
Kloppenberg:
“Thinking Historically:
A
Manifesto
of
Pragmatic
Hermeneutics”
o Joan Shelley Rubin: “Nixon’s Grin and other Keys to the Future of Cultural and
Intellectual History”
o Jeffrey Sklansky: “The Elusive Sovereign: New Intellectual and Social Histories of
Capitalism”

Jeffrey Edward Green, “On the Difference Between a Pupil and a Historian of Ideas”, Journal
of the Philosophy of History, vol. 6, 2012, pp. 84-110

Margrit Pernau, “Whither Conceptual History? From National to Entangled Histories”,
Contributions, vol. 7, no. 1, 2012, pp. 1-11

Myoung-Kyu Park, “Conceptual History in Korea: Its Developments and Prospects”,
Contributions, vol. 7, no. 1, 2012, pp. 36-50

David Armitage, ”What’s the Big Idea? Intellectual History and the Longue Durée”, History of
European Ideas, vol. 38, no. 4, 2012, pp. 493-507

Mikkel Thorup: ”Intellektuel historie”, Temp, no. 4, 2012, pp. 177-189

“Symposium: Assessing and Extending The Logic of the History of Ideas”, Journal of the
History of Ideas, vol. 73, no. 4, 2012
o Daniel I. O’Neill, “Revisiting the Middle Way: The Logic of the History of Ideas after
More Than a Decade”
o Martyn P. Thompson, “The Logic of the History of Ideas: Mark Bevir and Michael
Oakeshott”
31
o A. P. Martinich, “A Moderate Logic of the History of Ideas”
o Sara R. Jordan & Cary J. Nederman, ” The Logic of the History of Ideas and the Study of
Comparative Political Theory”
o Amit Ron, “The Logic of the Historian and the Logic of the Citizen”
o Mark Bevir, “Post-Analytic Historicism”

Hans-Jørgen
Schanz,
”Hvorfor
er
idéhistorie
vigtig?”,
November
2012,
http://baggrund.com/hvorfor-er-idehistorie-vigtig/

Frank Beck Lassen, “Afselvfølgeliggørelse – idéhistoriens raison d’etre”,. November 2012,
http://baggrund.com/afselvfolgeliggorelse-idehistoriens-raison-detre/

Mikkel
Thorup,
”Intellektuel
historie
–
idéhistorien
i
dag”,
November
2012,
http://baggrund.com/intellektuel-historie-idehistorien-i-dag/

Christopher Fear, ”The question-and-answer logic of historical context”, History of the Human
Sciences, vol. 26, no. 3, 2013, pp. 68-81

Stefanie Gänger & Su Lin Lewis, “Forum: a world of ideas: new pathways in global intellectual
history, c. 1880-1930”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 10, no. 2, 2013, pp. 347-351

Mikkel Thorup, Morten Haugaard Jeppesen & Frederik Stjernfelt (eds.), Intellectual History. 5
Questions, Copenhagen: Automatic Press 2013

Samuel Moyn & Andrew Sartori (eds.), Global Intellectual History, New York: Columbia
University Press 2013
o Samuel Moyn & Andrew Sartori, “Approaches to Global Intellectual History”
o Siep Stuurman, “Common Humanity and Cultural Difference on the Sedentary –
Nomadic Frontier: Herodotus, Sima Qian, and Ibn Khaldun”
o Sheldon Pollock, “Cosmopolitanism, Vernacularism, and Premodernity”
o Vanessa Smith, “Joseph Bank’s Intermediaries: Rethinking Global Cultural Exchange”
o Andrew Sartori, “Global Intellectual History and the History of Political Economy”
o Christopher L. Hill, “Conceptual Universalization in the Transnational Nineteenth
Century”
o Cemil Aydin, “Globalizing the Intellectual History of the Idea of the ‘Muslim World’”
o Samuel Moyn, “On the Nonglobalization of Ideas”
o Mamadou Diouf & Jinny Prais, “’Casting the Badge of Inferiority Beneath Black
Peoples’ Feet’: Archiving and Reading the African Past, Present, and Future in World
History
32
o Janaki Bakhle, “Putting Global Intellectual History in Its Place”
o Duncan Bell, “Making and Taking Worlds”
o Frederick Cooper, “How Global Do We Want Our Intellectual History to Be?”
o Sudipta Kaviraj, “Global Intellectual History: Meanings and Methods”

David Armitage, “The international turn in intellectual history”, chap. 1 in Foundations of
modern international thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013

Allan Megill and Xupeng Zhang, “Questions on the history of ideas and its neighbours”
Rethinking History, 2013, pp. 1-21

Brian Kjær Olesen, Jonas Gerlings, Kaarlo Havu, Daniel Knegt, Matti La Mela & Thomas Ø.
Wittendorff, “Doing things with intellectual history: Interview with Martin van Gelderen”,
Zeitenblicke, vol. 12, no. 1, 2013, www.zeitenblicke.de/2013/1/Gelderen

Slagmark, no. 67, 2013: Ny idéhistorie
o Frank Beck Lassen, “Afselvfølgeliggørelse – idéhistoriens raison d’etre”
o Roger Chartier, ”Historien – eller om at læse tiden”
o David Dunér, ”Den kognitiva vändningen”
o Mikkel Thorup, ”Taget ud af sammenhæng – om kontekst i idéhistorie”
o Mark Bevir, ”Kontekstualisme – fra modernistisk metode til post-analytisk
historicisme?”
o David Armitage, ”Hvad er den store idé? – intellektuel historie og longue durée”
33