Annual Review Project Title : English in Action Bangladesh Date started Review date : May 2008 : May 2013 Introduction and Context What support is the UK providing? English in Action is a £50 million programme being implemented over nine years (2008-2017) What are the expected results? English in Action (EIA) is designed to change the way that children, young people and adults in Bangladesh learn English. EIA was initiated at the request of the Government of Bangladesh and is funded by a grant from the UK Government. The programme’s expected outcome is ‘to increase significantly the number of people able to communicate in English to levels that enable them to participate fully in economic and social activities and opportunities.’ This aims to is to contribute to ‘economic growth by providing English language as a tool for better access to the world economy’. The project aims to reach 25 million primary and secondary school children and adult learners through innovative ways of learning spoken English using a combination of traditional and new methods. The projects results include - Increase the numbers of schools, teachers and pupils participating in English in Action primary interventions to 30,000 schools, 67,500 primary teachers and 6.75 million pupils (3.29 million M; 3.46 million F) and secondary interventions 9000 teachers (69%M; 31%F) and 3.75 million pupils (48%M; 52%F). - Employer satisfaction (with applicants’ / employees’ communicative English) to increase from 68% of employers in the baseline to 80% by 2016/17. - Increase motivation for learning and using English by students from 51% to 65%, and by teachers from 64% of to 80%). - Increase use of English Language news and media: online; broadcast or print based from 5% to 35% increase - National education systems and structures take on the programme initiatives (training methodology, revised curriculum, research, etc.) What is the context in which UK support is provided? English language teaching capacity has atrophied in Bangladesh due to the lack of trained English teachers in a centralised education system that expanded rapidly in the 1970s. Few people under fifty are confident, fluent English speakers, and English is the most commonly failed examination subject at the secondary certificate level. Lack of English language skills is regarded as a constraint to economic development. Job applicants and employees often lack English language skills necessary to work effectively. A pre-appraisal mission recommended that the problem be addressed at scale, through a project that would have substantial reach and impact. 1 Section A: Detailed Output Scoring Output 1: Primary teachers’ classroom practice and both teachers and students’ English language proficiency improved; and Output 3: Secondary Teachers’ classroom practice and both teachers and students’ English language proficiency improved. As the Outputs and the indicators are exactly the same for the two Outputs, except that one is for primary and the other secondary schools, it was felt that it would be more meaningful to address them together. The aim is two-fold: (i) to improve pupils’ competency in English ; and to achieve this, (ii) to improve teachers’ English language capabilities. Both of these are addressed through raising the quality of language teaching practices. Teachers’ own improved English language competence is both an enabling factor and an output. As an enabling factor, it makes the results sustainable. The immediate beneficiaries are the teachers and the students in the primary and the secondary education programmes of Bangladesh. Output 1 & 3 score and performance description: Overall Score for Output 1: A + Overall Score for Output 3: A + Summary Progress and Performance on Output 1 & 3 (2012 – 2013) Both output 1 and 3 have moderately exceeded expectation. Since the 2011 Annual Review, EIA has prepared to up-scale the primary and secondary school initiatives by approximately twenty-fold from Phase II (2008-2011) to Phase III (2011-2014). The present aim is to reach 12,500 teachers by 2014. Towards this target both the preparatory work in terms of quantity and quality exceeds expectation. The following actions have been put in place to meet the 2014 target: An updated model involving four thousand teachers in May & June 2012; and New teacher educators in 35 Upazilas across the country, including core trainers in Dhaka have been recruited and trained. This major up-scaling plan has led to important qualitative refinements to all aspects of the school interventions, including - more decentralized teacher support, more structured learning materials & modules, and more effective use of mobile technology. Key refinements include: strengthening 'expert' subject and teaching knowledge in the teacher training materials; using video to show authentic classroom practices of actual Bangladeshi teachers , and including 'teachers voices' in discussing teaching and learning; more emphasis on peer learning for teachers,; strengthening the role of Head Teachers, with more explicit and guided involvement in informal monitoring and support, through new Head Teacher materials and meetings, and; better quality assuring (QA) procedures, involving local government staff, thereby implementing a model through existing government structure to ensure teachers receive appropriate support. 2 Progress against expected results The expected results in annual indicators for 2013 are not given in the logframe. The milestones of performance used in the logframe for 2014 are: Performance indicators Milestones for 2014 1. Reach: The cumulative numbers of schools, teachers, and pupils participating in English in Action primary interventions Primary: 2,500 schools; 7,500 teachers (50%M, 50%F); 750,00 pupils (49%M, 51%F) Yes Secondary: 2,500 schools; 5,000 teachers (70%M; 30%F); 2.08 mn pupils (48%M; 52%F) Yes 2. Practice: The number of teachers evidencing communicative language teaching approaches in their classroom practice 20% student talk of new EIA cohort in a lesson; 60% of that talk in English Yes Primary: a) 7.5% more teachers at level 2 or above and 7.5% more teachers are at level 3 and above. b) 5% more students are at level 1 or above and 5% more students are at level 2 and above. Secondary: a) 7.5% more teachers are at level 3 and above and 5% more teachers are at level 4 and above. b) 10% more students are at level 2 and above and 5% more students are at level 3 and above. Yes 3. English Language competence: The proportion of EIA supported teachers and students reaching a particular English Language competence grade on Trinity Scale1. On track Yes Progress against indicators and milestones: Indicator 1: Reach. 2014 Milestone: Primary: 2,500 schools; 7,500 teachers (50%M, 50%F); 750,00 pupils (49%M, 51%F) Secondary: 2,500 schools; 5,000 teachers (70%M; 30%F); 2.08 mn pupils (48%M; 52%F) Progresses against the milestones for 2014 are on track. Up-scaling is already under way and has reached 975 primary and 927 secondary school and 4,906 teachers (2974 primary; 1932 secondary) exceeding the target of first batch. The next cohort of 8,000 teachers will be added in June 2013. Adding these additional numbers will result in exceeding the 2014 target for Output 1.& 3. 1 The Trinity Grade scale has been developed by Trinity College to assess students’ English Language ability. It is a 12-grade scale. For a brief overview, the first four grades on the scale can be described as follows: Trinity Grade 1 – requires knowledge of greetings and some basic personal information Trinity Grade 2 – speakers can offer and respond to short, simple questions, requests and statements relating to personal details and situations Trinity Grade 3 – speakers can exchange basic everyday information, asking and answering questions using simple sentence patterns Trinity Grade 4 – speakers can talk about a prepared topic, asking and answering questions about it 3 Indicator 2: Practice. 2014 Milestone: students are talking in the classroom for 20% of the lesson time; 60% of the talking time is in English. Progress against this output is on track. The progress has been assessed based on the feedback collected through continuous quality assurance process. Though full research data is not yet available, the quality assurance system is designed to monitor indications of classroom practice being affected by EIA training, with an ambitious 100% sampling target over the course of the intervention. QA findings indicate the project is on track to achieve the 2014 target: Feedback collected through questionnaires indicates that: Teachers report using EIA activities or practices in lessons either often, or in most of their lessons (97% of primary teachers; 90% of secondary teachers) Teachers report using EIA audio-visual materials, either often, or in most of their lessons (97% primary, 86% secondary teachers). On average, 95% of teachers report that they consider using the EIA activities and practices in their classroom as important or crucial, to their professional development, with over two thirds of primary teachers, and half of secondary teachers, considering these as ‘crucial’. Classroom observations, carried out in 748 classrooms between October 2012 to January 2013, indicate that: In almost all observed lessons, teachers speak in English more than half of the time (90% of primary teachers, 92% of secondary teachers observed) In most lessons observed, students speak in English more than half of the time (69% of primary lessons, 64% of secondary lessons) In almost all lessons observed, most students participated in EIA activities (98% of primary lessons, 97% of secondary lessons) In almost all lessons observed, teachers attempted to use pair and group work (95% of primary lessons, 93% of secondary lessons), In almost all lessons observed, teachers asked questions from a range of students (97% primary lessons, 100% of secondary lessons). The QA data shows a high level of adoption of EIA activities, techniques and materials, by teachers in the current cohort, which suggests that EIA is likely to exceed 2014 targets for changes in practice.. Indicator 3: EL Competence. 2014 Milestone: Primary: a) 7.5% more teachers at level 2 or above and 7.5% more teachers are at level 3 and above. b) 5% more students are at level 1 or above and 5% more students are at level 2 and above. Secondary: a) 7.5% more teachers are at level 3 and above and 5% more teachers are at level 4 and above. b) 10% more students are at level 2 and above and 5% more students are at level 3 and above. Research is used to determine changes in English Language (EL) competence of both students and teachers. . The assumption is firstly, that the students’ English speaking ability should improve through the use of EIA activities, materials and methods. Secondly, as the teachers continue to work and become more familiar with the materials, their own proficiency and skills would improve over time. The purpose of the research is to assess these assumptions. 4 Whilst there is no formal data on English Language competence for the current batch of teachers (impact evaluation studies are scheduled towards the end of 2013, when teachers will be completing their participation in EIA), the changes in practice noted above suggest that teachers and students, are both having significantly increased opportunity to listen, speak and communicate in English language, through changes introduced in classroom practice. That these changes in practice are in line with changes seen in the previous batches indicates that similar gains in English language competence may also be expected in the independent assessments in 2013. The project is on track or expected to exceed expectations to achieve this indicator. The independent reviewers made two observations. Firstly, that spoken English is only a part of the language skill. Sustainability of spoken English is relatively easy in a predominantly English speaking environment but is extremely difficult in a non-English environment unless the secondary and higher education environment naturally transforms itself into a multi-lingual environment as in many of the major cities in India. Secondly, the impact of a comprehensive approach combining all four competences i.e. speaking, listening, writing and reading, would have a better chance of sustainability than only spoken English. In light of the above observations they acknowledged that the EIA package actually does include reading and writing materials. However their recommendation is to strengthen the reading and writing components in the EIA curriculum, the EIA technology, in the classroom and individual learner assessments. Recommendation 1 Balancing reading and writing with speaking and listening: Communicative English should be defined to include all 4 competencies. Sustainability of the EL competence and ownership of EIA by Government of Bangladesh (GoB), especially by Directorate of Primary Education (DPE) would benefit from EIA strengthened reading and writing competences in classroom practice and classroom environments through a wide selection of reading materials available inside the classroom. EIA needs to assess for itself how best this could be achieved within the existing scope of the project. The current scope does not include funding to print large amounts of reading materials, however EIA can promote more reading materials inside the classroom and provide TA to the National Curriculum and Textbook Board (NCTB) to provide such materials The reviewers recommended: (a) Incorporating more reading and writing content into the EIA technology (for example 10 developmentally and culturally appropriate stories, creative writing exercises etc.). (b) Making available a wide selection of books (storybooks and interesting non-fiction) and reading materials inside the classroom, emphasizing that National Curriculum and Textbook Board (NCTB) has little expertise in this area. The textbooks, produced by NCTB are still very weak and would benefit enormously from technical support. This could help improve the textbooks to world standard. (c) Integrating reading and writing into the delivery of the teacher education package of the Government, and teaching and therefore, in the (d) Ensuring research on classroom practice and EL competencies which clearly captures the level of competence acquired both by the teacher and learner in primary and secondary schools. 5 (e) Log-frame adjustments to capture both reading and writing at the level of output and indicator. And strengthening the “talk-time” indicator, by including the range of ‘talk’ leaners are able to tackle demonstrating their speaking competence improvement. Recommendation 2 EIA intervention does not address children’s differentiated learning needs in classroom practice, which is one of the key elements of acquisition of sustainable competences. To address this effectively the independent reviewer recommended the EIA intervention package to , address each learner in a way that she/he is able to proceed according to her/his ability and pace; and secondly. They also recommended teachers prepare lessons according to ability groups instead of assuming that all children should be able to follow the prescribed syllabus and move forward at the same time. However this needs to be carefully assessed along with the overall objective and scope of the project and against the curriculum and textbook of the government, because EIA materials are all developed based on the national curriculum. Though it needs to be noted that EIA intervention has done much to alert teachers to the learning needs of their students, for example through developing skills in assessment for learning. This is the first step on the long road to a fully differentiated approach to teaching techniques. Impact Weighting (%): 25% Revised since last Annual Review? N Risk: Low Revised since last Annual Review? N Output 2: Improve adults’ attitude towards and proficiency in English through media. Output 2 score and performance description: A+ Progress against output 2 has moderately exceeded expectation. The reviewers were impressed by the quality and variety of materials produced for the adult learning and media component. There is strong evidence to indicate that Bangladeshi audiences use and appreciate these products, accessing them across television, print and mobile phone platforms as well as (increasingly but to a lesser extent) on the internet and face to face in English Clubs. A further impressive achievement is the partnerships with key media actors in Bangladesh and the considerable local capacity they have built in creative technologies. Over the past year and following the successful launch of the BBC Janala’s Amar Engreji (My English) Course, a second course has been developed and is in the process of rolling out across mobile, web and print. The course shares a common core syllabus across all platforms with content that focuses on improving functional, communicative English skills. The course content is culturally relevant for Bangladeshi learners, and reflects the interests & diversity of the population. Learning is designed to be personalised, allowing those using the service to proceed at their own pace. The course provides progressive, step-by-step learning, so that learners can track and evaluate their progress. All learners can undertake regular interactive quizzes to self-assess their learning; and can receive a Course Report on completion, to acknowledge their achievement. The second series of the project’s Mojay Mojay Shekha (Learning with Fun) TV series 6 completed broadcasting during the year. A new TV series – Nijay Nijay Shekha (Learning by myself) – has been developed and produced. The series follows eight real-life, beginner-level English learners, combining factual entertainment with elements of “reality TV” and allowing viewers to learn alongside the on-screen characters. Over 600 English Clubs in 31 districts have started activities so far, with an average of ten learners in each club. These English clubs are operating in partnership with local nongovernment organisations, many of whom are working with the poorest and most remote communities. The clubs use EIA adult learning materials from the Amar Engreji Course and are designed for peer-led learning environments where teaching expertise is not readily available. Other highlights during the year include a pilot community radio programme, which has been completed and is being evaluated in partnership with 14 community radio stations, and a major research study which sought to measure the effect of EIA media products on learners’ English competence. In particular, completing the second Amar Engreji Course has strengthened the extent and duration of engagement with language learning materials and is providing a progression route as well as a second entry point, above beginner level, for adult learners. Progress against expected results Performance indicators Milestones for 2014 On track 1. Cumulative numbers of Bangladeshis accessing BBC produced EIA media products. A cumulative total of 8.5 million people had used BBC produced EIA media products regularly by the end of March 2014 (65%male, 35% female) Yes 2. Perception of reduced barriers and increased positivity towards learning communicative English among school leavers and adults 43% of people who have used BBC EIA products will report increased motivation to learn and /or increased confidence to use English in their everyday lives (47%, 35%) Yes 3. The percentage of people exposed to BBC produced media products showing an increase in average competence as evidenced by speaking and listening test. 49% of people who have used BBC media products showing increased English Language ability Yes Progress against indicators and milestones: Indicator 1: Cumulative numbers of Bangladeshis accessing BBC produced EIA media products. 2014 milestone: A cumulative total of 8.5 million people had used BBC produced EIA media products regularly by the end of March 2014 (65% male, 35% female). 7 The output is well on track with signs of exceeding the target of 2014. The total number of users of each media product across television, mobile phone, internet and newspaper is tracked and shows continued impressive growth. At the time of the review performance was well on track, even without counting television viewers, There are an additional 1.6m committed users of mobile phone, web and newspaper products by February 2013. A cumulative total of regular users will be produced for the 2014 Mid-term Review. Progress reported for 2012-13 (including Amar Engreji Course 1 ), to February 2013: Television ‐ 13.6 million people watched Mojay Mojay Shekha 2. Mobile ‐ 3.3 million calls made to the service during the year. 700,000 users undertook learning using the new course. Website ‐ 780,000 unique visitors to the website during the year, with 140,000 registered users on the site. Indicator 2: Perception of reduced barriers and increased positivity towards learning communicative English among school leavers and adults. 2014 Milestone: 43% of people who have used BBC EIA products will report increased motivation to learn and/or increased confidence to use English in their everyday lives (47%M, 35%F) The focus on reducing barriers to learning and using English has been informed by base-line and continuing research, which shows that even people who have studied English at school, where the focus has been on reading and writing without developing speaking and listening skills, lack confidence to use English and are reluctant to study what is perceived as a difficult subject. To assess progress against this milestone a major survey will be done in 2013, feeding into the 2014 mid-term review. A number of smaller studies have also been done in the past year, from which there are good indications that the component is on track for the 2014 milestone. For example: Impact evaluation of Amar Engreji Course 1 undertaken during the year showed that “willingness to learn English” and “desire to learn English” both increased following exposure to the course. Qualitative feedback from Mojay Mojay Shekha 2 viewers demonstrates an interest in and positive attitude towards learning English from watching the series. “Mojay Mojay Shekha can inspire women because it provides them with the opportunity to participate in the show and other women will get inspired to learn English having been given the opportunity to watch them on TV.” Female, 20 Years, Manikganj Interviews conducted with Mojay Mojay Shekha 2 viewers before and after the series indicate an increased motivation to practice English with others, despite knowing that they might make lots of mistakes. Further, fear of learning English appears reduced, particularly amongst female, rural study participants. Indicator 3: The percentage of people exposed to BBC produced EIA media products showing an increase in average competence as evidenced by speaking and listening test. 2014 Milestone: 49% Preliminary results of testing suggest that achievement is on track for 2014. Reporting against this indicator requires the development of innovative methodology which, in itself represents a gain for the project. Assessing the effect of the BBC Janala mass-media intervention (mobile, TV, newspaper and webpage) on English competency, outside of a classroom setting, has provided a number of challenges. In particular, the design of the speaking tests used initially 8 were reviewed by an international ELT testing expert and have been redesigned in preparation for research on the impact of Amar Engreji Course 2. Despite challenges, results showing progress : 49% of the sample demonstrated an increase in English competence (of any size) between baseline and end line. Prothom Alo newspaper readers’ English competence increased over a five month period, with the level of competence increase correlating to their level of exposure to BBC Janala lessons. Mojay Mojay Shekha 2 viewers’ self-assessment of their own English competence was higher amongst those who had watched more episodes and amongst those who had watched for longer. Speaking test results for viewers not engaged in other informal English learning activities showed a small increase in competence, correlated to viewers’ level of exposure to the TV series. Additional analysis to demonstrate the effect of BBC Janala on learner’s English competence is still needed, although the experience of conducting the recent year’s research and the benefit of the expertise engaged to redesign the project’s speaking tests should further inform progress against the 2014 milestone. Recommendations: The English in Action project is regarded by DFID as well-positioned to contribute to key objectives for the Country Operational Plan and so is encouraged to be ambitious. This will require a wider team effort to identify the most appropriate opportunities and to consolidate a strategy to achieve them. While the development impacts of learning at the school level are well evidenced and understood in the longer term, the new Theory of Change (TOC) and the project’s critical paths analysis have enabled t better understanding about how the adult learning component can and should contribute to the higher order objectives. However, while the TOC has influenced the project – especially the research agenda – more can be done to unpack the assumptions at all levels of the logframe. This will reveal and define how changes are achieved and what they can lead to for individuals and more broadly in society and the economy. Recommendation 3 By the Mid Term Review (MTR) in 2014, EIA to develop a roadmap for sustainability of the adult learning and media component in order to make specific contributions to livelihoods, inclusion and economic development objectives. Impact Weighting (%): 25% Revised since last Annual Review? N Risk: Medium Revised since last Annual Review? N 9 Output 4: The generation and effective dissemination of knowledge and evidence for what works in improving English language competency and how this contributes to economic development in Bangladesh Output 4 score and performance description: A+ Progress against expected results Performance indicators Milestones for 2014 On track 1. Number of knowledge products developed to assess project at impact, outcome and output level. 15 Research reports; 9 research briefs; 4 studies assessing outputs and outcomes in Phase III for schools component and 6 for adult learning component; 5 case studies on befits and use of English. Yes 2. Amount of research disseminated to key school, upazila, district, divisional, national and international audiences, via appropriate knowledge products and platforms A Research Dissemination Action Plan developed and followed Yes Progress against indicators and milestones: Indicator 1: Number of knowledge products developed to assess project at impact, outcome and output level. 2014 Milestone: 15 research reports; 9 research briefs; 4 studies assessing outputs and outcomes in Phase III for schools component and 6 for adult learning component; 5 case studies on benefits and use of English. Indicator 2: Amount of research disseminated to key school, upazila, district, divisional, national and international audiences, via appropriate knowledge products and platforms. 2014 Milestone: Research Dissemination Action Plan developed and followed: 29 national and international conference papers (OU: 18, BBC: 11); 4 papers in peer-reviewed journals (OU) and 2 chapters in academic books (BBC); distribution of research reports to key stakeholders within Bangladesh and to research databases of Research for Development (R4D) and Open Resource Online (ORO) within OU; 3 policy seminars; and PSC/GoB meetings including with units within GoB and meetings with teachers and TFs. Progress and plans for research reports is on track and exceeds the 2014 expectations for publications and presentations. This is particularly valuable in the light of the recommendations of the 2012 Annual Review and the subsequent changes of the logframe. The independent reviewers found that EIA project management are using monitoring and research evidence as quality assurance across the implementation activities (monitoring), for continual improvement of project design, for laying a sound basis for evaluation and for dissemination of findings locally and internationally. Since the 2012 review, all aspects of this work have been strengthened by strategic planning against the new Theory of Change. More working on understanding the assumptions that underlie the TOC will be of further help. 10 The QA process for school interventions is being implemented, working through government Education Officers and Teacher Facilitators (TF) at Upazila level. Substantive local capacity building has taken place through a series of orientation workshops for senior primary and secondary Education Managers (divisional, district, upazila), Primary Teachers Training Institutes (PTI) and Secondary Teachers Training College (TTC) Principals and Academic Supervisors, and a series of training workshops for Education Officers and TFs implementing the QA processes in the field. Findings from the QA process have been shared with, in particular, the Teacher Training & Support Unit and EIA Management. Internal workshops have followed with Core Trainers and OU ELT academics to review and respond to these findings. Quarterly upazila sharing meetings have also taken place, where findings from the QA process are fed back and discussed with Upazila Education Officers (UEO) and TFs. The successful partnership with the Institute of Education and Research (IER) at Dhaka University has been continued with a new batch of MPhil students starting in January 2013. Their first fieldwork has taken place in respect of the cross-project community study. A cross-project dissemination action plan has been developed and research findings have been disseminated at senior Government workshops, policy seminars and major international & local conferences, such as the International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language (IATEFL), UNESCO, the Bangladesh English Language Teachers’ Association (BELTA), the Nepal English Language Teachers’ Association (NELTA) and mLearn (the conference on mobile learning). Key achievements are: Implementation of the new quality assurance system at scale, tracking over 4,000 teachers through a series of workshops and cluster meetings and through over 750 classroom observations. Establishment of improved project management information system (PMIS). Capacity of over 500 TFs and UEOs developed and utilized in quality assurance processes. Further development of the research collaboration with IER at Dhaka University, including five out of fifteen students who are on the MPhil programme on a self-financing basis as a move towards sustainability. Cross-project research findings disseminated through GoB workshops, policy seminar and at major international and local conferences and peer reviewed journal articles. For the adult learning / media component, most of the research conducted over the past year has been to evaluate the first Amar Engreji Course and to inform the development of the second. Studies informed the development of products on print, mobile and internet platforms. The diagram below shows the systematic user testing process for the first course. Research plans exist to measure the impact of the new course, being launched at the time of the review. A test designed by UK-based ELT specialists will measure improvement in English language competences of the second Amar Engreji Course users. Recommendations: The review team suggests opportunities to use data from the project as evidence for policy and strategy development in the education and training sectors in Bangladesh and globally. An increased focus on learning outcomes has already been embraced and should go deeper, using the evidence from this project and seeking relevance and applicability beyond English language learning. 11 The immensely attractive English in Action media products, the innovations in their delivery to school students, teachers and learners in the community, and the successes of the project could be showcased to DFID senior management and ministers for information and advocacy. Recommendation 4 The review team suggested DFID advise the EIA team on the most effective and useful options for defining, calculating and presenting the cost per improved learning outcome for children and adults, especially for policy dialogue in Bangladesh. This is needed in time for research to be planned and results produced by the MTR in 2014. Impact Weighting (%): 10% Revised since last Annual Review? Y Risk: Low Revised since last Annual Review? N Output 5: The institutionalisation and sustainability of EIA approach across schools and the media sector Output 5 score and performance description: A+ Progress has exceeded this output and is one of the strongest areas of the school component. Considerable success has been noted on securing gains in practice and evidence for policy making. The project is now well-positioned, to influence policy and strategy, both within DFID and beyond. Progress against indicators and milestones: Performance indicators 1. Develop strategic partnerships with key institutions and building capacities to sustain EIA interventions beyond the life of the Project. 2. Influencing the development of an English language media sector through improvements in the capacity to develop products and programmes 3. English Language education policy in Bangladesh supporting communicative language teaching practices 4. Influencing curriculum, Textbook and assessment changes supporting Communicative English Language Teaching Milestones for 2014 On track Key strategic partnerships established and strengthened capacity of partners in the areas of teacher training, materials development and research Yes Key organisations and 100 sector professionals have taken part in ELT media capacity building initiatives Yes Core policy holders stakeholder bodies, including MOPME and MOE, engaging in development of new architecture for English Language education policy in Bangladesh. EIA actively engaging with Government of Bangladesh institutions to reform the curriculum, revise the textbook and adjust the assessment 12 Yes Yes mechanism Progress against expected results Indicator 1: Developing strategic partnerships with key institutions / the formal and informal educational community and building necessary capacities to sustain EIA interventions beyond the life of the Project. 2014 Milestone: Key strategic partnerships established & strengthened capacity of partners in the areas of teacher training, materials development and research. Increased partners’ responsibilities for implementing EIA interventions. Progress is well on track with clear evidence of strengthened engagement with the GoB and an appreciation from the government side of the value of EIA technical assistance and products. This is evidenced by: Requests from the Secretary of Ministry of Primary and Mass Education (MoPME) for the EIA approach to be rolled out to all schools in the country. MoPME approval of technical cooperation between EIA and NCTB regarding textbooks, student workbooks, teachers guide, audio-visual and other supplementary materials and primary curricula. Directorate of Primary Education (DPE) invitation to provide technical advice on the content of their six-day in-service training course, which has now been provided. Directorate of Secondary and Higher Education (DSHE), Director of Monitoring and Evaluation to hold joint workshop in June 2013 for collaboration plans for monitoring and evaluation. Joint research undertaken with NCTB. Substantial contribution to the development and piloting of the new pre-service teacher training called Diploma in Primary Education (DPEd). During the past year, the following activities have been undertaken: EIA Orientation and Cooperation workshop organised in collaboration with DPE in February 2013, with participation from MoPME, Ministry of Education (MoE) and 5 key GoB agencies. Academic contribution to the development of the Diploma in Primary Education (DPEd) programme in collaboration with National Academy for Primary Education (NAPE). Directly working with NCTB on a range of specific activities, including input to new teacher guide, participating in small-scale trialling of new textbooks. Responding to requests from DPE and DSHE to provide technical advice on aspects of inservice training and monitoring. Working with a major World Bank and GoB secondary sector initiative, in reviewing their ELT materials and in the development of a proposal for TV broadcasting for teachers. Policy Seminar in May 2012 on "Making learning effective through teacher professional development – implications for policy". Indicator 2: Influencing the development of an English language media sector through improvements in the capacity to develop products and programmes. 2014 Milestone: Key organisations and 100 sector professionals (Broadcast and ELT) have taken part in ELT media capacity building initiatives BBC Janala has continued to show success against this indicator and is on track to achieve the milestone. With the 3rd creative media workshop, held in September 2012, 74 participants have been reached, and another is planned for 2013. 13 The aim of the creative workshop was to bring together young Bangladeshi creatives, from a variety of backgrounds including film, animation, photography, digital media and ELT, to develop ideas for ELT media. The week‐long training allowed participants to develop a wide range of ideas for low cost English learning media products and involves intensive brainstorming, with inputs and advice from a range of senior creative professionals. A secondary outcome of the creative workshop process is the links that the project has been able to make with senior members of the ELT and media industries in Bangladesh. Following feedback from these partners, an exploratory workshop was held in June 2012 with a view to form an informal “alliance” of ELT and media organisations. Representatives at the workshop set out and agreed a vision for English learning media in Bangladesh – this common goal is an important part of meeting the sustainability goals of the adult learning component in the long term and work will continue with key industry representatives to support and encourage progress in this area over the coming year. The plan for building a media ‘alliance’ around ELT and the plan for content distribution in the next phase of the project amount to a sound strategy for capacity building and sustainability. Indicator 3: English Language education policy in Bangladesh supporting communicative language teaching practices. 2014 Milestone: Core policy stakeholder bodies, including MOPME and MOE, engaging in development of new architecture for EL education policy in Bangladesh. The progress under Indicator 1 shows that the project is laying the basis for necessary engagement and is on track to achieve this milestone too. Indicator 4: Influencing curriculum, textbook and assessment changes supporting Communicative English Language Teaching. 2014 Milestone: EIA actively engaging with GoB institutions to reform the curriculum, revise the textbook and adjust the assessment mechanism Progress shows a strong basis for achieving this milestone. However, reforms on the curriculum and textbooks for one subject are unlikely to lead to reforms in assessment, which will be necessary across the curriculum. So, a focus on classroom practice and teachers’ understanding of how students are learning or failing to learn is important, and an emphasis on differentiated learning is essential but not sufficient to drive a much wider and deeper set of reforms. Assessment systems are key as they determine incentives for particular behaviours and can undermine progress at the school and classroom level. For this reason, the project progress needs to be seen as and deployed as evidence for the wider sector dialogue and policy reform. Recommendations: The project has identified and created many valuable opportunities for sustainability of gains beyond those suggested in the original approach and the listing of assumptions and risks. For both components and the project as a whole, taking full advantage of these opportunities during the next phase will be crucial. The project should not be seen in isolation but in terms of how it contributes to a range of development objectives. For this reason, the EIA ‘brand’ could soon become a hindrance and is in fact already being toned down for more effective integration within a harmonised and aligned dialogue on policy and planning, led by DFID. On the other hand, the powerful reputation of the BBC will continue to signal quality for its distinctive products. 14 Recommendation 5 The reviewers recommended that DFID and EIA develop a roadmap for strengthening the strategic contribution of the project as a whole to wider and higher order objectives in the DFID Country Operational Plan, including aid effectiveness principles of alignment and harmonisation. This should be done by the time of the MTR. Efforts should be refocused and intensified with these changes reflected in individuals’ annual objectives and results reported to the MTR. However this recommendation needs further discussion and analysis within DFID and the project. Impact Weighting (%): 15% Revised since last Annual Review? N Risk: High Revised since last Annual Review? N Section B: Results and Value for Money. 1. Progress and results 1.1. Has the logframe been updated since last review? Yes. 1.2 Overall Output Score and Description: A+ The English in Action project is performing strongly and consistently across all outputs. It is well on track to produce results that meet and in fact exceed expectations. . The project team has clearly done very well, despite delays in GoB approvals, t and remained on track with very good quality delivery, in both the classroom behaviour change and in the media impact. An additional area that exceeds expectations is that of quality, with training, print products, innovative use of technology, quality assurance/monitoring and world standard research all contributing beyond what can normally be demanded of a sector-based project. Management of the team and capacity building also deserve the strong endorsement of the review team. What cannot be under-estimated is the way in which so many challenges e.g. delay in government approval, new textbook resulting in adjustment in training materials, have been faced and overcome. There remain strategic challenges, as outlined in this report, but there is confidence that the team, with DFID’s support can take these on board and respond accordingly so that the outputs will clearly contribute to achievement of the outcome. 1.3 Direct feedback from beneficiaries The review took place at an exceptionally difficult time in Bangladesh and the planned field visit to Sylhet had to be cancelled because of threatened national strikes. Visits to only two schools in Dhaka were possible, so that the review team had little opportunity to talk to teachers and students. Feedback received from teachers, one head teacher, one deputy and a dozen school students was all positive (and conducted in English); and active classroom practice was observed. It is difficult however to draw broader conclusions and so the reports of media user surveys and of ‘teacher voice’, for example, are valuable information on how 15 beneficiaries perceive the project. 1.4 Summary of overall progress An action plan in response to the 2012 Annual Review recommendations has been developed and implemented, A summary of progress against the action plan is shown below grouped into six focus areas. Revision in the project framework The project logframe has been updated in light of the 2012 Annual Review recommendations, in particular for Impact/Goal and Output 4, and simplified, where possible. A Theory of Change: from Learning English to Economic Development, based on critical pathways, has been developed and endorsed by DFID. Institutionalisation and sustainability of schools programme, including advocacy Since the 2012 Annual Review, the project made significant progress in building relationships with GoB; getting engagement with different mainstream activities, including textbook revisions, pre- and in-service teacher training and monitoring and evaluation; and undertaking a number of advocacy initiatives at different levels, drawing on the practical experiences of the project. A series of reflections and stories from a range of EIA participants (including teachers from the pilot phase) have been collected. EIA developed plan for appropriate and effective methods to gather, interpret and disseminate “Teacher Voice” through self-reporting of experiences and issues (questionnaire, focus group discussion, interviews etc.) In parallel, project staff have undertaken classroom observations and deeper interviews with participants. These are being used to prepare a set of actions for reconnecting to pilot teachers, revisions to teacher professional development materials and to inform plans for local institutionalisation and sustainability. In parallel, champions amongst teachers have been identified. GoB workshops/meetings are drawing on the research evidence – targeted at central Ministries and education departments and agencies and at local level at District and Upazila Education Officers. Adult learning: assessment, content and sustainability An English language test, linked to course syllabus, has been designed with an independent ELT expert and linked to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. In advance of Adult Learning Course 2, new additional materials are being published on the BBC Janala web and print platforms to maintain learners’ momentum. Potential models for the future sustainability of access to and development of ELT media content have been presented to DFID. Research Dissemination & Project Communications A comprehensive participant analysis, communications and research dissemination strategies, relevant partner or participants engagement plan setting out key activities within Bangladesh has been completed. An expert has reviewed and reported on EIA’s dissemination and, in a second report, set out a proposed framework for dissemination action plan. 16 Drawing on this, a cross-project 2013/14 dissemination action plan has been developed. Strategic focus has been adopted to target dissemination at ELT, international development education research/teacher education and technology/mobile learning audiences (international, regional and local), in addition to GoB and other local major players. Policy seminars are drawing on the research evidence – in May 2012 on "Making learning effective through teacher professional development – implications for policy" and planned in third quarter of 2013 on “Assessment of English in Schools”. A cross-project communications team has been set up, which meets quarterly and regularly updates the DFID Communications Team. A number of significant joint outputs have been launched, such as the new EIA website, EIA brochure, community fairs. Brand equity research has been undertaken and the value for money of promotional materials has been reviewed. All promotional items follow DFID guidelines and EIA Communications Strategy. Social Inclusion An audit of the Social Inclusion Strategy Action Plan has been undertaken and 2013/14 actions prepared. DFID held a social inclusion session with BBC for broader technical understanding and addressing inclusion issues in the adult learning materials The creative brief for Year 5 TV production was extended to socio-economic group E and research undertaken into further ways of reaching the poorest. The TV series developed during the past year was specifically targeted at the poorest and will contain a strong call to action to publicise the mobile platform as well as other BBC Janala content. Further the selection criteria of schools include a strong mix of diversified demographic settings, socio-economic conditions, male-female ratio and varied ethnic communities. All project reporting should show disaggregation of data for gender, rural/urban, sub-national and socio-economic categories. Value for money The cost per child or adult with improved learning outcomes is being calculated to assess the cost-effectiveness of project interventions. Particular focus has been given to review the unit cost of materials per teacher for the schools component and unit costs for each media component and for the English Language clubs for the adult learning component. In addition to the Annual Review recommendations, an environment strategy is in progress and will be finalised soon. 1.5 Key challenges The operating environment faces additional instability and this has been reflected in the revised risk assessment. A related key challenge is to build sustainability for all project achievements within and beyond the state sector, by extending the working definition of sustainability beyond institutionalisation, by continuing to manage risks effectively and to strengthen and develop partnerships and innovation. Other emerging themes from this review are to challenge the project to: aim for and analyse the improvement of learning achievements beyond the specific outputs for school students and adult learners, so that these are seen to contribute (at Outcome level) to social and economic opportunities; to maintain the very strong management and performance of the project through the next 17 period of scale-up and consolidation and despite the threat of political instability; further to work on the assumptions within the new Theory of Change; and (by doing this) to win the support and leadership of DFID beyond the education sector – to help achieve and understand the gains at outcome and impact levels. Additional funding request English in Action and DFID have identified areas where project successes can be increased and ensured in the final sustainability phase through additional funding. The focus will be on capacity building within GoB teacher education and monitoring structures, and on supporting institutionalised implementation in the final phase (Phase IV) and on extending adult learning materials to provide industry-specific learning opportunities at higher levels. Since the last annual review, EIA has deepened engagement with a wide range of GoB ministries, directorates and agencies. These experiences suggest that the extent of capacity building, support and monitoring required for effective institutionalisation of the schools component at both national and local levels is significantly greater (by an order of magnitude) than was apparent during project design. However, the current budget for Phase IV sees a halving of the current Phase III budget with a ten-fold increase in the teacher reach target. If, in addition to the increased targets, the project is to respond more effectively to the need and demand from GoB and other partners for the full institutionalisation of EIA’s approaches (both to strengthen impact and increase sustainability); and maximize impact and value for money by extending the project’s reach, then additional efforts and funding will be needed. 1.6 Annual Outcome Assessment The logframe measures success at this key level with the indicators and milestones below. These are quoted in full because the question arises whether these measures do provide the most useful balance of focus on the most valued outcomes of the project with the most cost effective methodology for obtaining the information and the best ways of presenting it. The review team would like to suggest that measures of competence need to be understood by stakeholders in Bangladesh. This could mean a relatively simple ‘translation’ of Trinity levels into description of competences. Having done this, is it possible to link the project measures with GoB objectives and strategies, for example in the labour market, and with other skill delivery and accreditation mechanisms in the public and private sectors? In any case, data should be disaggregated by gender, poverty level, sub-national regions, etc. to be of most value for policy makers. It is understood that this will not be a problem for EIA. Outcome Indicator 1: Increases in proficiency in communicative English among the population of Bangladesh. 2014 Milestone: Numbers of teachers, students and adult learners classified at higher (improved) levels of proficiency. Outcome Indicator 2: Employers’ satisfaction (with employees’/applicants’ communicative English). 2014 Milestone: (Decreasing) numbers of applicants without and (increasing) number of employees with necessary EL skills. Outcome Indicator 3: Motivation for learning and using English among school population of Bangladesh. 2014 Milestone: Number of students and teachers who report that English is very important and difficult to learn. Outcome Indicator 4: Use of English language news and media: online, broadcast or print18 based. 2014 Milestone: 30% improvement from baseline. It is not possible to report accurately on progress towards the outcome measures but the evidence presented of initial and small-scale investigations gives positive signs that progress sound, towards the 2014 milestones. Annual reporting would not be cost effective for these measures. However, with some further work, the logframe and TOC can be improved to aid significantly the management of the project and the process of the MTR, at all levels and especially for the outcome: Recommendation 6 The logframe should provide annual indicators of progress, because this would make scoring more precise. This review has focused on whether progress is ‘on track’ for the 2014 milestone rather than report against a set of indicators for 2013. Indicators should also be specific, measurable, attainable, realistic and timely (SMART) as far as possible to facilitate objective scoring. Recommendation 7 As noted, the TOC will be more useful if assumptions are further unpacked to show how the key changes between inputs – outputs – outcome – impact are expected to be achieved, with research and QA focussing on testing these assumptions. 2. Costs and timescale 2.1 Is the project on-track against financial forecasts: Y The project is on track against financial forecasts. Training of the first 4,500 teachers under Outputs 1 and 3 in Phase III was set back by six months in 2012 due to a delay in GoB approving the project, and this means in turn that the final 8,000 teachers in Phase III are planned to start from June 2013. Activities and budget have been re-profiled and approved by DFID to ensure outputs will still be achieved by end 2014. In order to mitigate the effect of the planned reduced budget for the adult learning component, a request was made to DFID to bring funds forward for this component from Phase IV into Year 6. This was recently approved. 2.2 Key cost drivers Key cost drivers of the schools component are teacher support, materials and equipment. Significant reductions in materials unit costs have been, and are planned to be, achieved by reviewing and, if appropriate, removing specific types of classroom materials (e.g. figurines), streamlining remaining resources (e.g. flash cards) and achieving economies of scale through greater quantities. In Phase IV, it is planned that equipment costs will be met from a variety of sources; specifically, teachers will use their own mobile phones, the project will continue to provide memory cards and PEDP III programme has expressed interest in supplying the speakers. For the adult learning component, key cost drivers relate to the production for and use of the various media platforms: television, mobile phone networks, web and the English Clubs. As Phase III draws to a close, the adult learning component will also be able to begin to evaluate the “whole life” unit-cost of media platforms, as well as the year-on-year costs. These costs are effectively decreasing every day, since every repeat TV broadcast or additional mobile user accessing content produced in preceding years decreases the unit cost for those products. 19 More details on unit costs and of the compliance with associated recommendations are reported in the Value for Money (VFM) section below. 2.3 Is the project on-track against original timescale: Y Despite many and serious challenges in the operating environment, the project team has proved very flexible and determined, has continued to build capacity, ensure quality and manage implementation within the plans. 3. Evidence and Evaluation 3.1 Assess any changes in evidence and implications for the project There is a new Theory of Change.. This has had implications for the project and research design and the new evidence will feed into analysis of contributions to outcome and impact. At the root of the project is the question of ‘Why English now in Bangladesh?’ the definitive answer lies within the demonstration of successes at outcome and impact levels. Meanwhile, the review team was continually reassured by Bangladeshi stakeholders, as well as by the research evidence, that English language skills are highly valued and that demand for their acquisition is very strong. 3.2 Where an evaluation is planned what progress has been made? No evaluation is currently planned. The Mid Term Review in 2014 is the opportunity to monitor the project in depth as it enters the next phase. 4. Risk 4.1 Output Risk Rating: Medium (unchanged) 4.2 Assessment of the risk level The 2012 AR noted that the main risk for the EIA programme was its sustainability. This has been identified primarily as a question of institutionalisation (within government structures and processes), potentially threatened by political instability which is outside the control of the project. As noted elsewhere in this review, the project is now well-positioned to explore other aspects of sustainability and to analyse a range of opportunities within and beyond the state sector. This will also contribute to spreading and mitigating risk. The comprehensive EIA risk management matrix has recently been updated. The revisions at Impact and Outcome levels (a,b) and for Outputs 1 and 3 (c) are: Major political instability at national level: probability increased from Low to Medium, with some additional information on the upcoming elections and criminal court verdicts of the war criminals. Current political commitments to prioritise English learning for economic development not maintained: from Low to Low-Medium, related to the upcoming elections and possible change of power. Failure to gain timely and effective access to schools and teachers: increased from Low to Low-Medium. 20 4.3 Risk of funds not being used as intended Risk of funds not being used as intended is low. Overall the project is managed well and costs controlled. The project has experienced some delays in 2012 due to textbook revisions and political instability in Bangladesh. This led to the project being off track against financial forecasts. To recover these delays and ensure project targets are met, activities and the budget have been re-profiled and included in Year 6. 4.4 Climate and Environment Risk Not assessed. 5. Value for Money 5.1 Performance on VfM measures The project continues rigorously to measure and monitor key performance indicators on Value for Money through transparent and well documented processes. These indicators focus on the cost of inputs (materials) and outputs (cost per teacher/student/adult learner reached) and thus the VfM concepts of economy and efficiency. In the past year, further work has been done to develop methodology for measuring quality, to be expressed as cost per learner with improved learning outcomes. This is a challenge, especially outside a classroom or school context, for adult learners with access to project material across a range of media platforms but the work being done is innovative and will be valued by many stakeholders. The 2013 Annual Review aims to strengthen the efforts since the last AR to develop a Theory of Change which encompasses Outcome and Impact levels and makes recommendations related to further development of methods and measures for improving VfM in terms of effectiveness (maximising conversion of outputs to impact). The VfM concept of equity, too, is being addressed and the recommendation on using disaggregated data relates to this. 21 5.2 Commercial Improvement and Value for Money Following the 2012 review recommendation the project is seriously working towards monitoring the cost per child or adult with improved learning outcomes. This will demonstrate how costeffective the intervention is at improving language skills of those reached. The definition of ‘improved learning outcome’ is being very carefully considered; for example, to ascertain its fit with relevant DFID-used global indicators and to ensure that it can be clearly understood and explained. Creating a sustainable legacy can be seen as an element of VfM cost-effectiveness, so the project needs to find a way to take creating a ‘legacy’ into account. EIA is not only seeking to improve student learning outcomes, which could be implemented through a wholly project mode, but also to make this change in ways that are sustainable to scale within the GoB system at national and local levels. Therefore, activities may take longer and be more resource-intensive but they will be sustainable and more cost effective in time. New methodology is being developed to calculate the cost per adult learner with Improved learning outcome. In recent months, a study was completed to track English language competency increases amongst media product users. This data, alongside the learning gained from the competency testing process, will enable the project to define improved learning outcomes amongst adult users of EIA media products and develop a mechanism for tracking the cost per adult with improved learning outcomes in the future. Value for Money of the schools component is dependent on the number of schools reached and the project’s effectiveness in improving students’ English competence. The project is on target to reach 12,500 teachers by 2014 and plans to reach a further 64,000 teachers by 2017. Based on these figures, the unit cost per teacher of delivering the teacher development package reduces from £600 in Phase II to £302 in Phase III and to £23 in Phase IV. Similarly, the cost per student reduces from £3 in Phase II to £1.20 in Phase III and to £0.20 in Phase IV. Comparable data against cost per teacher is not available mainly because the teacher training methodology and package differs from government teacher training programme. The table below indicates the approximate unit cost of the various types of government teacher training program and it should be noted that this does not include the material development costs whereas EIA cost per teacher does. Training £ Unit cost* 119 64 44 ICT training Subject based training Sub cluster training Teacher support network leadership training for head teacher Pre service training (12 months) Induction training for new teachers 34 93 38,889 52 *Based on 2013/14 annual operational plan of the sector programme. A request from the Secretary of MoPME has been made for the EIA approach to be rolled out to all primary schools in the country, which will potentially further reduce significantly the cost per student reached. In response to the recommendation to ‘continue refining the materials to ensure they are low cost, durable and potentially affordable for GoB to reproduce after the end of the EIA 22 programme. The indicative per teacher or pupil spend on materials under the Third Primary Education Development Programme (PEDPIII) programme could be used as a benchmark against which to compare project spend.’ The project has undertaken a cost comparison with PEDP III, showing printed materials at a higher cost (although the extent and quality of the EIA materials is higher) and equipment at a lower cost. Any monies spent by GoB on student textbooks are highly unlikely to result in changes in student learning without associated teacher training. For an additional £0.20 (primary) & £0.02 (secondary) per student, EIA can provide a full set of teacher professional development and classroom resources to the teacher to support their effective use of the textbook. A workshop with partners and stakeholders is planned in June 2013 to review how the materials can be made more cost effective, yet maintain good quality. Finally in response to the recommendation to stop promotional items without a developmental goal the project now only produces promotional items with a development goal and minimises cost of all such items. For example the EIA notebooks and pens are produced and provided to only to project related people i.e. teachers, trainers, education officers and unit cost has been brought down from £2.7 to £0.96. Under the adult learning component, in response to the 2012 recommendations, the project is now measuring and monitoring unit costs for each platform. Where regular user data is available – particularly for the web and mobile platforms – unit costs are tracked monthly as part of BBC Media Action’s organisation-wide value for money reporting processes. The cost per learner for each of these platforms has also been reduced contributing to economies of scale. The unit costs for Year 5 (2012/13) are presented below alongside the Year 4 (2011/12). Platform Television English club Mobile – new users Mobile – multiple users Mobile – calls Web – visits Web – new registered users Book & CD Industry training Total Project Cost Year 5 Total cost £821,442 £182,374 £342,018 £175,089 £7,919 £39,211 £1,568,052 Total no of users / units 13,619,200 6,000 544,822 294,476 3,396,917 604,723 60,290 135,400 26 Cost per head Year 4 2011/12 £0.13 £55.73 £0.24 £1.32 £0.07 £0.79 £4.72 £0.52 £2,049 Cost per head Year 5 2012/13 £0.06 £30.40 £0.63 £1.16 £0.10 £0.29 £2.90 £0.06 £1,508 % change -54% -45% 166% -12% 36%* -63% -38% -89% -26% These show a reduction in unit costs for the majority of platforms, driven by: Increased experience amongst local production and creative staff, many of whom have now been working on the BBC Janala project for a number of years, reducing the need for the project to pay for international expertise or to outsource key creative activities. Cessation of project subsidy to retail platforms (books and CDs), which are now solely maintained by commercial income received by private sector partners. Absence of initial start-up costs for English clubs and industry training activities, incurred in previous years. * Unit costs for mobile users and calls have risen over the year, due to a reduction in call volumes rather than an increase in expenditure in this area. With fewer TV outputs on air and a much reduced marketing budget for the year, call numbers have declined. However, unit costs for users who dial the service multiple times have decreased suggesting that, despite lower call volumes, users are spending more time on the platform when they call. 23 As Phase III draws to a close, the adult learning component will also be able to begin to evaluate the “whole life” unit-cost of media platforms, as well as the year-on-year costs. These costs are effectively decreasing every day, since every repeat TV broadcast or additional mobile user accessing content produced in preceding years decreases the unit cost for those products. 5.3 Role of project partners The management of the project by BMB remains an area of strength for EIA. Quality assurance through tightly managed, transparent processes, excellent human resources, well documented procedures and very detailed monitoring combined with learning from a wide range of world class research activities. BMB is, with the largest part of the EIA team, also is one of the three main implementing partners, with the Open University (OU) and BBC Media Action. This gives a slightly complicated structure and it has been necessary from time to time to check the balance of roles and communications across management, implementation, monitoring and research. Document and information management by the project team appear excellent with documents well-categorised and easily available to the review team. Recommendation 8: One further improvement, starting with preparations for the mid-term review, would be to ensure that reporting against strategic outputs 4 and 5, as well as against outcome and impact, clearly bring the contributions of the two components together, as an aid to cross-project planning for synergies. It is important to point out that since the beginning of the project, cross-project strategic exchanges and peer support/feedback has contributed significantly to the generation of new ideas and enhanced the quality of both the media and schools components since the start of the programme. The joint strategic learning environment should be considered a critical factor behind the success of EIA as a project. The cross-project linkages go beyond joint strategy development and learning and include joint coordination of activities. A good example is the Research Monitoring & Evaluation Coordination Group (RME-CG), which plans, approves and coordinates all RME activities that happen across the project and supports the implementation of joint research activities. This was also reflected through changes in the logical framework early 2012 and taken a step further through the collaborative development of a Theory of Change document produced in 2013. The joint EIA Research Dissemination Strategy and joint research activities are covered under Output 4 and the joint EIA Social Inclusion Strategy is also noted elsewhere in this review. BBC-produced media content is integrated and embedded within the English Language for Teachers (EL4T) course provided to teachers, through material available on teacher’s mobile phones and workbooks. There is also joint work on delivery, with the BBC Janala English Clubs launching in schools, supported by the EIA schools’ component, and joint capacity building in the creative workshops organised under Output 2. 5.4 Does the project still represent Value for Money : Y English in Action does represent Value for Money and this is expected to increase over the life of the project, especially by factoring in the quality of products, the extent of reach and the sustainability of innovative delivery, behaviour change and language competence along with a pattern of declining unit costs. 5.5 If not, what action will you take? n/a 24 6. Conditionality 6.1 Update on specific conditions n/a 7. Conclusions and actions The review team was highly impressed by the professionalism of project management and implementation. The project was originally designed primarily as technical assistance and it brought on board the Open University and BBC Media Action as well as creating a team of local EIA project staff and partners. This has helped ensure that sound evidence from research and from activities on the ground are produced and continually fed back to inform practice and adjust directions. Information management is extremely good. The implementation of the schools component has demonstrated that behaviour change in the classroom to create an effective learning environment can happen and to scale. The adult learning and media component has generated enormous interest and appreciation across Bangladesh and for all socio-economic categories. This is clearly laying the basis for sustainability but there are still challenges ahead. To ensure sustainability, the techniques of communicative language teaching will have to go beyond the English classroom to the other subject areas and influence other key aspects of education, such as assessment. The concept of sustainability will also need to be extended beyond the state sector and have real life impacts on poor peoples’ access to livelihood opportunities. 8. Review Process The review team of one international and one national consultant worked with EIA and DFID Bangladesh for 12 days from 27th April to 10th May. Over one hundred documents were made available to the team and presentations on annual progress were made by the implementing partners. Despite the logistical and security challenges, the team observed lessons and talked to teachers in one primary and one secondary school. Separate meetings were held with all the project partners and with EIA senior management. There were also meetings with officials of DPE and NCTB, IER, with Prothom Alo and the ADB. The review team would like to thank the whole EIA team for their exceptional efficiency, patience and flexibility during the review. 25